New World Order – Part 7 (Special report on the North/South Korean Crisis)

New World Order – Part 7 (Special report on the North/South Korean Crisis) by Drake Eyre International – Bringing You The News No One Else Wants To Bring You The Hidden Truth Behind The News New World Order – Part 7 (Special report on the North/South Korean Crisis) with 3 comments New World Order – Part 7 Never in human history has this wonderful planet and its inhabitants  been subjected to such an evil satanic regime !! Never since its creation has an organisation create so much damage to its environment, government,  people, finances and it industrial base and kept us all at war chasing non existent terrorists!! Special report on the North/South Korean Crisis We are looking here at the progress collapse of the current New World Order as we know it and it is obvious that their financial infrastructure has now been severed. Their survival has now become very desperate and as they say “Desperate people do desperate things.” The New World Order has for some time been seeking World War III in a desperate attempt to survive………wars are very good for business, generate revenue from arms sales, higher fuel prices and massive contracts to clean up and rebuild the infrastructure they have just bombed out etc!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8ElKqnVRS8 This master plan resurfaced during a visit to the Pentagon by General Wesley Clark the Ex NATO Supreme Commander Europe when after two visits he was told they were going to take out Iraq………on his second visit he was told by that same person that it was going to be more than Iraq and turned out to be at least 7 countries………ok so you don’t believe me take a look at these two links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8ElKqnVRS8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nt1Q1rW5g6s Here is confirmation of the status of  General Clark: We have since observed that John ;"> General Wesley Clark commanded Operation Allied Force in the Kosovo War during his term as the Supreme Allied Commander Europe of NATO from 1997 to 2000………….I would like to remind you all that NATO is the military arm of the New World Order. Clark joined the 2004 race for the Democratic Party Presidential nomination as a candidate on September 17, 2003, but withdrew from the primary race on February 11, 2004, after winning the Oklahoma state primary, endorsing and campaigning for the eventual Democratic nominee, John Kerry. We have since observed that John Kerry has taken over from the “Old Nag” Hilary Clinton as United States Secretary of State. —————————– Are we now looking down the barrel of yet another “Gulf of Tonkin False Flag Potential” that started the Vietnam War but t The main infrastructure of the New World Order has Israel and Zionists (Both Christian and Jewish)  at its heart!! For obvious reasons I have had to hold fire on myld Order, is their greatest obstacle and it is China that is fast becoming a major super power in both the military sense and financial sense.  When one considers that the New World Order is currently in a state of collapse and the fact that they will loose control of the World’s Collateral Accounts and substantial wealth associated with those accounts it is easy to see why they are now switching their attention away from their failed campaign in the Middle East and now diverting their attention to No4; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif;"> Again one must understand how important it is for the cabal to enter into WWIII in order for them to extend their survivability and at the same time to be given the opportunity to go up against possible Russia or China………….the latter would be to their advantage as China, according to the New World Order, is their greatest obstacle and it is China that is fast becoming a major super power in both the military sense and financial sense.  When one considers that the New World Order is currently in a state of collapse and the fact that they will loose control of the World’s Collateral Accounts and substantial wealth associated with those accounts it is easy to see why they are now switching their attention away from their failed campaign in the Middle East and now diverting their attention to North Korea whom they have been intimidating for some considerable time!! Imagine if they could start WWIII and pull in China……what better way for them to possibly gain some ground and even reduce their debt to China!! We see all those in authority now saying that North Korea is making direct threats against the USA especially in regard to possible nuclear missile attacks etc but this is a mix of words because North Korea is stating that “If Attacked it will carry out reprisal attacks using its advanced technologies” etc…….its all a war of wards at the moment but given one simple mistake or false flag (as per Vietnam) we could see WWIII become a reality. For those thick skulled leaders and experts who think this is good I would like to remind you of the “Catastrophic Consequences” should they bring about a war. Can any of you even imagine the west using Depleted Uranium Weapons and  Low Yield Nuclear Weapons (such as the B61 etc) on nuclear facilities and what that would do to the world’s environment? It would make Nagasaki and Hiroshima look rather miniscule by comparison!! We would have immediate radioactive contamination and the distribution of millions upon millions of radioactive nano particles spreading around the region covering from India in the West to the Western Seaboard of the US  in the east and from North China in the North to the Philippines in the south within one week and the rest of the world within a month. I have many times published my own upper wind charts showing how this contamination is distributed both by normal air flows and jet streams and by any existing monsoonal flows as the charts below show………….under these charts you can also see a graph that showed very high radioactive contamination in the general Greater London area as a direct result of the Coalition attack on Baghdad and on the Tora Bora mountains in Afghanistan……this is factual forensic evidence……..how could anyone in their right mind support such action……….but hey don’t listen to me just continue watching your favorite programmes on TV and watch the world go by and suffer the consequences of an alarming increase in cancers, especially in our babies,children and grandchildren!!!!!!! ————————————— Let me know evaluate everything and hopefully at the same time allow you the readers to better understand this  New World Order mentality and at the same time ask you “Where lies the true axis of evil” ?………..certainly not in some far away Islamic country or some CIA fictitious group they call Al Qaeda, Syria, Iran or North Korea but right here in the heart of our own leaders and governments!!!  ————————————— I would first ask you all a question that if a combined military force assembled off the coast of the US, UK Australia or wherever and started conducting high intensity military exercises (war games) including live firing of missiles, bombs, shells etc  extremely close to your borders, would you be concerned? If at the same time there was a small group of islands that you believe belonged to you but for some reason were being held in dispute suddenly became surrounded by that same force, would you be concerned? If those same countries also imposed an embargo of your territory or imposed severe sanctions would be concerned and feel intimidated? If those same countries were allowed to test fire or create their own Weapons of Mass Destruction and also pass them on to their allies to be placed close to your borders or to fly in additional aircraft to support a potential strike would you be concerned and feel threatened? I am sure that we would all come up with the same answer “YES.” So lets look at the more recent historical incidents that has led to North Korea responding in such a way and also look at some western media coverage showing a distinct Zionist (propaganda) stance: Disputed Border The disputed maritime border between North and South Korea in the West Sea      A: United Nations-created Northern Limit Line, 1953      B: North Korea-declared “Inter-Korean MDL”, 1999 The locations of specific islands are reflected in the configuration of each maritime boundary, including 1. Yeonpyeong Island 2. Baengnyeog Island 3. Daecheong Island Having studied international maritime law and the current The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) criteria one can clearly see that North Korea certainly has credibility for its claim to these islands. However it remains a disputed border. With this in mind one should never allow such military activity to occur at such locations because of the inherent risks of a simple misunderstanding or stray munitions turning into further escalation or full blown conflict. This has almost occurred on previous occasions such as: The bombardment of Yeonpyeong was an artillery engagement between the North Korean military and South Korean forces stationed on Yeonpyeong Island on 23 November 2010. Following a South Korean artillery exercise in waters in the south, North Korean forces fired around 170 artillery shells and rockets at Yeonpyeong Island, hitting both military and civilian targets. The shelling caused widespread damage on the island, killing four South Koreans and injuring 19. South Korea retaliated by shelling North Korean gun positions. The North Koreans subsequently stated that they had responded to South Korean shells being fired into North Korean territorial waters. The incident caused an escalation of tension on the Korean Peninsula and prompted widespread international condemnation of the North’s actions. The United Nations declared it to be one of the most serious incidents since the end of the Korean War, and by December 18 former UN ambassador Bill Richardson said tensions had escalated to become “the most serious crisis on the Korean peninsula since the 1953 armistice which ended the Korean War.” (note this incident was after the Cheonan sinking). We must also go back even further to see another incident which The Battle of Daecheong was a skirmish between the South and the North navies near the Northern Limit Line (NLL) on 10 November 2009 off Daecheong Island. A patrol boat from the North (DPRK) was seriously damaged while the navy of the South (ROK) sustained no casualties. According to western media: The incident began around 11:27 am when a North Korean navy patrol boat crossed down through the NLL, which is not recognized by the DPRK following two warnings from South Korean naval units. After one more warning announcement, one of the South Korean patrol boats fired a warning shot. In response, the North Korean boat began firing upon the South Korean ship. This resulted in a short exchange of fire between the sides. The North Korea vessel expended approximately 50 rounds, and the South Korean craft returned fire with 200 rounds. So one can see how intimidation by the west can get totally out of control and how this lead to the major incident that occurred with the South Korean Corvette – Cheonan only this time the North were not involved and clearly became a more modern day “Gulf of Tonkin Incident” which was another false flag that started the war in Vietnam!!! The ROKS Cheonan sinking occurred on 26 March 2010, when the Cheonan, a Republic of Korea Navy ship carrying 104 personnel, sank off the country’s west coast near Baengnyeong Island in the Yellow Sea, killing 46 seamen. A South Korean-led official investigation carried out by a team of international experts from South Korea, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Sweden presented a summary of its investigation on 20 May 2010, concluding that the warship had been sunk by a North Korean torpedo fired by a midget submarine. North Korea denied that it was responsible for the sinking. North Korea’s further offer to aid an open investigation was disregarded The Peoples Republic of China dismissed the official scenario presented by South Korea and the United States as not credible. An investigation by the Russian Navy also did not concur with the report. The United Nations Security Council made a Presidential Statement condemning the attack but without identifying the attacker…………….note the latter comment which did not identify the attacker…….had the UN done so it would have got egg all over its face when everyone knew this was clearly a false flag!! I printed an article about this incident which I repeat below: Was the sinking of the South Korean Warship a False Flag?   So many times we hear or read about conspiracy theories or false flag operations whereby the CIA, Mossad or other secret service operatives create an incident and then conveniently point the finger at a country or organisation with whom that have a bone of contention. I actually have a special interest in this particular incident having spent much time working with submarines both operationally and also whilst working on-board a torpedo recovery vessel (TRV). During my time in the navy I also worked on minesweepers and so got to understand all aspects of underwater warfare. One certainly has to keep an open mind on the sinking of the Cheonan as several methods could have been used. The possibilities are endless ranging from torpedoes, to limpet mines to many other types of mines – Acoustic Mines – Magnetic Mines and Contact Mines all of which can either be moored to the ocean floor or just sit on the bottom. Some mines can actually release a homing torpedo when an enemy vessels approaches. One should also keep in mind that there are also options as to how this incident occurred that resulted in yet another “False Flag” incident hyped up by the US. It could have been a friendly fire incident or an intentional act by using an ally torpedo or a moored mine both of which have the ability to split the ship in two.  Maybe many of you are convinced and happy to accept the South Korean version of this event but you must all fully understand those that carried out the inquiry were all allies of South Korea and no independent analysis was ever carried out. I therefore hope that when you have read this article you may be totally convinced or maybe have some doubt in your mind as to the true facts behind this incident. One must fully understand that this particular area is a very sophisticated training ground for Anti Submarine Warfare (ASW) and accordingly would be extremely well protected against any intrusion by other vessel and or submarines. It is also important to keep in mind that this same area is also carefully monitored by China and Russia who have some very sophisticated equipment and apparatus to watch over every aspect of the Korean Peninsular. The sinking of the South Korean Corvette Cheonan took place on the evening of March the 26th2010 at 2122 local time in total darkness. The location was just offshore on the southwest corner of Baengnyeong Island which sits very close to the border with North Korea. The island is a hub for the South Korean military and is also a very active area for war games with many other nations, especially the United States Navy which I will explain below. Baengnyeong Island is a Secret Joint US-South Korean Naval Base for anti-submarine warfare (ASW) operations. The surrounding waters are relatively void of any civilian vessels making it a perfect location for a multitude of naval exercises. What is more important is the solitude and silence in its waters making it a good location to install sonar listening devices which one normally associated with areas used for submarine training and anti submarine training. One could also assume that it would also be a good location for mine laying and mine sweeping activities as well as regular exercise in submarine hunting by both surface craft and submarines. Add to this both surface and sub-sea training by the US Navy Seals  It is very important to fully understand that this location would be very heavy protected by Land Sea and Air. The lack of en route traffic would also make it a perfect listening ground for approaching vessels, submarines or any other craft as well as any weapons that were release by a submarine such as a torpedo or underwater launched missile. The joint US-South Korean naval base is staffed by American and South Korean naval special operation force personnel and accordingly uses extremely sophisticated weapons and apparatus.  Obviously one would first ask the question that if the US and South Korean Navy monitor the North Korean Navy at all times and knew that certain vessels had left their base how is it possible for any vessel to sneak into a highly protected zone undetected. In this case it was in relatively shallow water and well within the sonar listening zone. One should also remember that the local US Naval Commander himself declared that there was no North Korean activity in the area.  Let’s just read some comments from experts who know this area extremely well and who also believe this was certainly a “False Flag” as I do:  The March attack on the South Korean Navy anti-submarine warfare (ASW) corvette, the Cheonan, was a false flag attack designed to appear as coming from North Korea. One of the main purposes for increasing tensions on the Korean peninsula was to apply pressure on Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama to reverse course on moving the U.S. Marine Corps base off Okinawa. Hatoyama has admitted that the tensions over the sinking of the Cheonan played a large part in his decision to allow the U.S. Marines to remain on Okinawa. The Cheonan was sunk near Baengnyeong Island, a westernmost spot that is far from the South Korean coast, but opposite the North Korean coast. The island is heavily militarized and within artillery fire range of North Korean coastal defenses, which lie across a narrow channel. The Cheonan, an ASW corvette, was decked out with state-of-the-art sonar, plus it was operating in waters with extensive hydrophone sonar arrays and acoustic underwater sensors. There is no South Korean sonar or audio evidence of a torpedo, submarine or mini-sub in the area. Since there is next to no shipping in the channel, the sea was silent at the time of the sinking. However, Baengnyeong Island hosts a joint US-South Korea military intelligence base and the US Navy SEALS operate out of the base. In addition, four U.S. Navy ships were in the area, part of the joint U.S-South Korean Exercise Foal Eagle, during the sinking of the Cheonan. Investigations of the suspect torpedo’s metallic and chemical fingerprints show it to be of German manufacture. There are suspicions that the US Navy SEALS maintains a sampling of European torpedoes for sake of plausible deniability for false flag attacks. Germany does not sell torpedoes to North Korea, however, Germany does maintain a close joint submarine and submarine weapons development program with Israel and as we know these submarines passed through the Suez Canal some time ago. The Republic of Korea Navy also just happens to operates type 214 submarines, also built and exported from Germany. These submarines use 533mm DM2A3 torpedoes that have a striking resemblance to the parts that were recovered from the sea bed in the vicinity of the Cheonan sinking. The presence of the USNS Salvor, one of the participants in Foal Eagle, so close to Baengnyeong Island during the sinking of the South Korean corvette also raises questions. The Salvor, a civilian Navy salvage ship, which participated in mine laying activities for the Thai Marines in the Gulf of Thailand in 2006, was present near the time of the blast with a complement of 12 deep sea divers. Beijing, satisfied with North Korea’s Kim Jong Il’s claim of innocence after a hurried train trip from Pyongyang to Beijing, suspects the U.S. Navy’s role in the Cheonan’s sinking, with particular suspicion on the role of the Salvor. The suspicions are as follows: 1. The Salvor engaged in a seabed mine-installation operation, in other words, attaching horizontally fired anti-submarine mines on the sea floor in the channel. 2. The Salvor was doing routine inspection and maintenance on seabed mines, and put them into an electronic active mode (hair trigger release) as part of the inspection program. 3. A SEALS diver attached a magnetic mine to the Cheonan, as part of a covert program aimed at influencing public opinion in South Korea, Japan and China. The Korean peninsula tensions have conveniently overshadowed all other agenda items on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s visits to Beijing and Seoul. What is also remarkable about the sinking of the Cheonan was the fact that the Director of the South Korean National Intelligence – Won See-hoon told the South Korean Parliamentary Committee in early April, less that two weeks after the incident that there was no evidence linking North Korea to the sinking. South Korea’s Minister of Defence Kim Tae-young also backed him up by saying that the crew of the stricken corvette had not detected a torpedo. It was also interesting to learn that the Head of the Marine Operations Office at the South Korean Joint Chiefs of Staff agreed that “No North Korean Warships have been detected in the waters where the accident took place.” Defense Ministry officials added that they had not detected any North Korean submarines in the area at the time of the incident When speculation persisted that the Cheonan had been sunk by a North Korean torpedo, the Defense Ministry called another press conference to reiterate “there was no unusual North Korean activities detected at the time of the disaster.” A ministry spokesman, Won Tae-jae, told reporters that “With regard to this case, no particular activities by North Korean submarines or semi-submarines…have been verified. I am saying again that there were no activities that could be directly linked to” the Cheonan’s sinking. Rear Admiral Lee, the head of the marine operations office, added that, “We closely watched the movement of the North’s vessels, including submarines and semi-submersibles, at the time of the sinking. But military did not detect any North Korean submarines near the country’s western sea border.” So, a North Korean submarine is now said to have fired a torpedo which sank the Cheonan, but in the immediate aftermath of the sinking the South Korean navy detected no North Korean naval vessels, including submarines, in the area. Indeed, immediately following the incident defense minister Lee ruled out a North Korean torpedo attack, noting that a torpedo would have been spotted, and no torpedo had been spotted. Finally we have the statement made by the South Korean Coast Guard Captain Go Yeong-jae who rescued 56 of the stricken warship’s crew, he “received an order …that a naval patrol vessel had run aground in the waters 1.2 miles to the southwest of Baengnyeong Island, and that we were to move there quickly to rescue them.” The Cheonan incident certainly indicates yet another US, South Korea or possibly Israel concocted story that resembles  another false flag incident that occurred during the Viet Nam War in the Gulf of Tonkin, in which the US fabricated a story about North Vietnam sinking the USS Maddox. This was used as an excuse to attack North Vietnam. Now we see America, South Korea and possibly Israel fabricating evidence in order to carry out an aggressive strategy towards North Korea under the pretext of “self-defense.” What is also another most important part of this cover up was Clinton visit to Japan re the possible closure of a US Marine air base. Let’s now turn to the evidence and prove that the South Korean Government with the help of the investigation team from the US, Sweden, Australia and the UK tried to deceive the international media into believing their analysis was correct. When the South Korean Government did their first major press conference they very carefully created a full sized copy of the CHT-02D (which they say was used by the North Korean Navy in this incident). They just happened to obtain a copy of a brochure for this torpedo which they say is used to promote sales of the torpedo to overseas customers. (as shown above) They even went a stage further to show a full scale drawing that was held up above the recovered parts to show that it was this actual torpedo that sank the Cheonan. However, many people noticed that this certainly was not the case as the scale and design of the rear part of the torpedo did not match the drawing.  After some time the South Korean Government then produced another black and white detailed diagram that resembled the actual parts located and made a statement that they had rushed the original drawing to show the media and accordingly had made some mistakes. My question would be “How is this possible if the brochure was the actual brochure produced by the North Korean for their export market”?  I then decide to put the two drawings together and compare both with the actual recovered parts and again we can see that not only do the diagrams not align but also the propeller on the parts recovered is a much more sophisticated design in the aero dynamical sense. Also note the corrosion of the metal and prop which would indicate a longer period of time in the water and also longer period of oxidization once taken out of the water. The maximum time the remnants of the actual torpedo that they claim sank the Cheonan was seven weeks. The actual weapon used to sink this vessel was either a German manufactured torpedo or a moored submerged mine of possible US design both of which were capable of splitting the Cheonan in two as you can see in the video:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oUNt47G-08 One can also see an alternative view of this incident:  http://www.nowpublic.com/world/new-gulf-tonkin-south-korean-torpedo-sunk-rok-warship   When one looks at the more modern German DM2A3 you can see a striking resemblance, not only in the design of the tail and propeller but also in its colour. You will note that the base colour of the German torpedo is the same as the parts that were put on public display  I have to say that yet again we see a classic US generated “False Flag” operation that in this case could take South Korea, US and allies to yet another war! It is time that the people of the world, in particular those that live in the US, see through this false façade and stop these tyrants in their tracks. The axis of evil is not in some distant land but in minds of such people as Kissinger, Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Clinton and all those that have and continue to surround them. The ultimate responsibility for these evil actions must clearly rest on the shoulders of the Presidents and Prime Ministers of those countries who participate in such actions. I will close off this article with a famous saying by Gandhi that adds meaning to this particular article:  “When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible but in the end, they always fall — think of it, ALWAYS.” End of original article ————————– To look deeper into the current crisis we need to look at the situation as it stands today and what the western media are saying about this…………the following extraction is from the The New York Times and written by Choe Sang-Hun and David E. Sanger – published 29th March 2013 SEOUL, South Korea — This week, North Korea’s young leader, Kim Jung-un, ordered his underlings to prepare for a missile attack on the United States. He appeared at a command center in front of a wall map with the bold, unlikely title, “Plans to Attack the Mainland U.S.” Earlier in the month, his generals boasted of developing a “Korean-style” nuclear warhead that could be fitted atop a long-range missile. w Kim Jong-un, the North Korean leader, met with military leaders in Pyongyang on Friday. Some of the photos of military preparedness released by Korea appear to be digitally manipulated. But the missile systems that figure in Mr. Kim’s blitz of threats and orders do not yet have the range to approach American shores. There is no evidence his nuclear weapons can be shrunk to fit atop a missile. And a prominent photograph showing Mr. Kim’s military making a Normandy-style beach landing appears to have been manufactured, raising questions about whether his forces could possibly repeat the feat his grandfather pulled off in 1950, ordering a ground attack to open the Korean War. On top of all that, most countries on the verge of a major military assault do not broadcast their battle plans to the world. “You would expect such a military order to be issued in secret,” said Kim Min-seok, spokesman of the South Korean Defense Ministry. “We believe that by revealing it to the media and publicizing it to the world, North Korea is playing psychology.” In fact, it is the abilities that Mr. Kim is not showing off that have the Obama administration most worried. The cyberattacks on South Korea’s banking system and television broadcasters two weeks ago were surprisingly successful, as was the torpedo attack three years ago this week on the Cheonan, a naval corvette, that killed 46 South Korean sailors. The North has never acknowledged involvement in either — though the South believes it was responsible for both and so do American experts. “We’re convinced this is about Kim solidifying his place with his own people and his own military, who still don’t know him,” one senior administration official said Friday. He added, “We’re worried about what he’s going to do next, but we’re not worried about what he seems to be threatening to do next.” The cyberattacks and torpedo attack have something in common: Unlike the missile attacks and beach landings that Mr. Kim seems to be suggesting are imminent, they are hard to trace to North Korea, at least immediately. As a result, they are hard to retaliate against, and in fact the South never struck back militarily for the sinking of the Cheonan, even after a commission of inquiry, with experts from outside South Korea, concluded it was the work of a submarine-launched torpedo. To North Korea experts in Washington and Seoul, there is something familiar in the country’s threats to “keep the White House in the cross hairs of our long-range missiles.” Such threat of armed brinkmanship — the catchphrase in the 1990s was that Seoul would become a “sea of fire,” a term recently revived by North Korea’s news agencies — has in the past drawn its adversaries to the bargaining table with economic concessions. But at the same time, the tensions with the outside world provide the government with opportunities to elevate its leader’s status among his people — which might be more important to a young, untested leader than it was to his father and grandfather. According to the view that North Korea’s propaganda machine pounds into its citizens’ minds, the North is a tiny nation besieged by hostile outside forces, one that survived despite decades of sanctions and can finally stand up to both its longtime Chinese ally and American enemy — all thanks to the strong “military-first” leadership of the Kim family and the country’s nuclear arsenal. In such a setting, Mr. Kim’s trip to a border island on a wooden boat — it almost seemed designed to create a “Washington crossing the Delaware” motif — is proof of his “daring and pluck,” as the country’s main party newspaper, Rodong, explained. Rodong also declared about North Korea’s nuclear weapons: “Let the American imperialists and their followers know! We are not a pushover like Iraq or Libya.” The first, famously, had no nuclear weapons; the second gave up its nascent nuclear program in late 2003, a move North Korea describes as Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi’s greatest mistake. Choe Sang-Hun reported from Seoul, South Korea, and David E. Sanger from Washington. —————————– I did not put anymore of this dribble in my article for obvious reasons as my intention is to show you both sides of the coin!! —————————————– The most important aspect of this article is to clarify who is indeed the aggressor………if any country continues to harass or carry out war games in and around disputed territories or impose harsh sanctions then one can expect the victims of that aggression to respond……….it is clear that the main aggressor is the United States. When we read the highly censored news they tell us that North Korea is a clear danger and that they have approved plans in motion to strike the US with nuclear weapons etc………this is a very warped interpretation of what North Korea has actually said………..their response is that “if you attack me I will carry out reprisal attacks against you”……this is not rocket science it is a common understand by any country that whoever carries out the first strike brings that country into war and thus a reprisal attack is not only expected but is also duty bound!!!! In closing I want you all to remember the victims of our thirst to go to war and realise that what goes around comes around and that you yourself, no matter what country you reside, in will eventually succumb to such contamination…….especially anything on the scale of going to war with Iran or North Korea……be warned and stop the New World Order and NATO from any further conflicts!! How would you like to live in the Balkans – Kuwait – Iraq – Afghanistan – Yemen – Somalia – North Pakistan – South Lebanon – Gaza and be subjected to this type of treatment? Could you still smile like this very brave boy? Peter Eyre – 5/4/2013 Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis Drake | April 5, 2013 at 8:06 pm | Categories: News | URL: http://wp.me/p2tRr3-O4

North Korea Nuclear Threat

China supplied North Korea with an orbital nuke platform

China supplied North Korea with an orbital nuke platform
That's what NK launched into space in February. It wasn't just a test satellite. It's small but potent and contains 5 tactical orbit-to-surface nukes, each with a 500 kiloton payload.

This is why NK has adopted a totally warlike rhetoric. They may be outgunned and outnumbered but they have unlimited firing range. Detonated above the US/Europe/Asia/Japan they'll be able to knock out the electrical grid and begin their own ground invasion of South Korea and Japan, leaving Europe and the US to China.

Trust me, this is the absolute truth. My uncle is a general in the British army and they are trying their best to keep a lid on this to prevent worldwide panic. Apparently Obama is "looking at all the options" whatever that means.
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2191950/pg1

Re: China supplied North Korea with an orbital nuke platform
You can check out [this article]( [link to www.northkoreatech.org] that mentions "4 objects being tracked by NORAD". However, 3 of those were probably rocket boosters and/or debris.

However, you can track these objects in their parabolic path at the links, here -

[KMS 3-2]( http://www.n2yo.com/?s=39026)
- The actual satellite

[Object 2]( http://www.n2yo.com/?s=39027)
- (R/B - denotes rocket/booster) Still trackable in space

[Object 3]( http://www.n2yo.com/?s=39028)
- (Debris) Still trackable.

[Object 4]( http://www.n2yo.com/?s=39029)
- (Debris) Still trackable.

Since the DPRK announced to international space orgs that they would have a Pacific splashdown of the main booster, and it fell, I have a hard time believing that there is "still a booster" out there. But, oh well... Let's just see how this whole thing plays out.

If they do happen to have a device capable of dropping an EMP blast over the US from one of these things, [it could take about 10 years to recover from one]( [link to www.wnd.com]
http://www.n2yo.com/?s=39027)

Keep in mind that the US government gave NK the nukes. Bill Clinton gave NK two fissionable nuclear reactors. When they threatened to make nuke bombs, George Bush gifted them with 4 more for a total of 6 fissionable nuclear reactors.

The NK "threat" is all a carefully orchestrated psyop to keep the sheeple in fear and to distract them from the real threat...the collapse of the US financial system. All world leaders are friends and belong to the same club...don't let anyone fool you.

Most of the nuclear devices are already INSIDE the USA. They were smuggled in parts and secretly put together in targeted cities awaiting detonation commands. Even Israel has some hidden in the USA. You sheeple have no idea.



Home » North Korea » `The Concern Is Great': U.S. On Alert For Nuclear Attack From North Korean Satellite

`The Concern Is Great': U.S. On Alert For Nuclear Attack From North Korean Satellite
Apr 1, 2013 5 Comments Jake Hammer
Excerpted from WND:
WASHINGTON – U.S. officials quietly are expressing concern that North Korea could use its "space launch vehicle" to explode a high-altitude nuclear device over the United States, creating an electromagnetic pulse that would destroy major portions of the U.S. electrical grid system as well as the nation's critical infrastructures.
The concern is so great that U.S. officials who watch North Korea closely are continually monitoring the status of the North Korean "space launch vehicle," whose status could suggest a pre-emptive nuclear strike against the United States.
They are aware of the three-stage missile North Korea launched last December that also orbited a "package," which experts say could be a test to orbit a nuclear weapon that then would be deorbited on command anywhere over the U.S. and exploded at a high altitude, creating an EMP effect.
This concern is in addition to North Korea's latest threat to strike targets in Hawaii and the continental U.S., as well as possible attacks against U.S. bases in South Korea and Japan.
The 28-year-old North Korean leader, Kim Jong-un, has signed an order for North Korea's strategic rocket forces to be on standby to fire at U.S. targets.
The signing was against a photo backdrop following an emergency meeting of his senior military leaders showing large maps that were labeled "U.S. mainland strike plan, specifically at Hawaii, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles and Austin, Texas."
One WND reader who traced the targeting to Texas said that it really was aimed at the Dallas/Fort Worth area.
The latest North Korean threats occurred after the U.S. sent two B-2 stealth bombers to strike targets with inert bombs during joint U.S.-South Korean military exercises, which Kim considered a major provocation.
"He finally signed the plan on technical preparations of strategic rockets, ordering them to be on standby to fire so that they may strike any time the U.S. mainland, its military bases in the operational theaters in the Pacific, including Hawaii and Guam, and those in South Korea," according to a statement by the North Korean news agency, KCNA.
The statement added that the B-2 flights showed Washington's "hostile" intent, and the "reckless" act had gone "beyond the phase of threat and blackmail."
In response, U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel condemned North Korea's actions which to date have included dissolving the 1953 armistice between North and South Korea, severing the military hotline with South Korea and putting its artillery forces on high alert and threatening, once again, nuclear strikes against the U.S.
http://patdollard.com/2013/04/u-s-on-alert-for-nuclear-blast-overhead/


WND EXCLUSIVE
U.S. ON ALERT FOR NUCLEAR BLAST OVERHEAD
'Space launch vehicle' could put kill electric grid, devastate nation
Published: 4 days ago
F. MICHAEL MALOOFAbout | Email | Archive
F. Michael Maloof, staff writer for WND and G2Bulletin, is a former senior security policy analyst in the office of the secretary of defense.
WASHINGTON – U.S. officials quietly are expressing concern that North Korea could use its "space launch vehicle" to explode a high-altitude nuclear device over the United States, creating an electromagnetic pulse that would destroy major portions of the U.S. electrical grid system as well as the nation's critical infrastructures.
The concern is so great that U.S. officials who watch North Korea closely are continually monitoring the status of the North Korean "space launch vehicle," whose status could suggest a pre-emptive nuclear strike against the United States.
They are aware of the three-stage missile North Korea launched last December that also orbited a "package," which experts say could be a test to orbit a nuclear weapon that then would be deorbited on command anywhere over the U.S. and exploded at a high altitude, creating an EMP effect.
This concern is in addition to North Korea's latest threat to strike targets in Hawaii and the continental U.S., as well as possible attacks against U.S. bases in South Korea and Japan.
The 28-year-old North Korean leader, Kim Jong-un, has signed an order for North Korea's strategic rocket forces to be on standby to fire at U.S. targets.
The signing was against a photo backdrop following an emergency meeting of his senior military leaders showing large maps that were labeled "U.S. mainland strike plan, specifically at Hawaii, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles and Austin, Texas."
One WND reader who traced the targeting to Texas said that it really was aimed at the Dallas/Fort Worth area.
THIS is how an EMP event could bring the world's remaining superpower to its knees. Read it in "A Nation Forsaken".
The latest North Korean threats occurred after the U.S. sent two B-2 stealth bombers to strike targets with inert bombs during joint U.S.-South Korean military exercises, which Kim considered a major provocation.
"He finally signed the plan on technical preparations of strategic rockets, ordering them to be on standby to fire so that they may strike any time the U.S. mainland, its military bases in the operational theaters in the Pacific, including Hawaii and Guam, and those in South Korea," according to a statement by the North Korean news agency, KCNA.
The statement added that the B-2 flights showed Washington's "hostile" intent, and the "reckless" act had gone "beyond the phase of threat and blackmail."
In response, U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel condemned North Korea's actions which to date have included dissolving the 1953 armistice between North and South Korea, severing the military hotline with South Korea and putting its artillery forces on high alert and threatening, once again, nuclear strikes against the U.S.
In recent weeks, North Korea also had released three videos showing a nuclear strike on the U.S.
"We've made very clear that we have the capability and willingness to protect our interests and our allies in the region," according to deputy White House press secretary Josh Earnest. He said that the U.S. military exercises with South Korea should offer "pretty clear evidence" that the U.S. can defend its interests and those of its allies in the region.
Sources say that sending the B-2s was in response to the recent North Korean threats to send a message – a message which Russia and China called a "provocative act."
Russia and China have asked the U.S. to continue talking to North Korea and not to take military action against North Korea.
In response to North Korea's initial bellicose rhetoric, Hagel ordered the deployment of additional Aegis anti-missile systems for the U.S. West Coast. They originally were destined for Europe. And a second anti-ballistic missile radar is to be installed in Japan.
However, the Aegis anti-missile systems won't be operational until 2017, although there are some systems already deployed along the West Coast.
North Korea's continuing threats of a pre-emptive nuclear strike against U.S. targets suggest to U.S. officials that its military is confident in the capability of its missiles and that its recent nuclear testing for miniaturization of a warhead to be placed on a missile similarly was successful.
These officials are looking at the prospect that upon launch of the missile and a potential nuclear payload, it would take a polar path, clearly out of range of U.S. Aegis anti-missile systems.
The fact that U.S.military officials are expressing quiet but increasing concern that North Korea could launch an EMP attack has raised alarms over the preservation of the U.S. national grid and such critical infrastructures as communications, energy, food and water delivery and space systems.
This concern recently has been reinforced by a little-publicized study by the U.S. Army War College that said a nuclear detonation at altitude above a U.S. city could wipe out the electrical grid for hundreds, possibly thousands of miles around.
The impact would be catastrophic.
"Preparing for months without a commercial source of clean water (city water pressure is often dependent on electric pumping to storage towers) and stoppage of sewage treatment facilities will require net methods of survival particularly in populated areas," the military study said.
The May 2011 study, titled, "In the Dark: Military Planning for a Catastrophic Critical Infrastructure Event," concluded that there is "very little" in the way of backup capability to the electric grid upon which the communications infrastructure is vitally dependent.
Analysts say that it is apparent that Kim has ignored any advice from its closest friend, China, to stop any further missile or nuclear testing suggesting, as one official described Kim, as a "loose cannon."
Kim also has been defiant of any United Nations Security Council resolutions similarly condemning the recent missile and nuclear tests. China had joined in approving those resolutions.
"The time has come to settle accounts with the U.S.," the KCNA agency declared.
"The Obama administration is either clueless or deceiving the American people with false assurances that North Korea's recent threats to destroy the United States are merely `empty rhetoric' because they allegedly `lack the capability,'" one former U.S. official told WND.
Some regional analysts, however, believe that Kim is seeking to leverage the U.S. for further concessions while attempting to win favor with his own military to show how tough he can be.
These analysts say that until now Kim has not had the support from the military that his father, Kim Jong-Il, had.
His war-like tone may be indicative of attempts to solidify military support within his country.
At the moment, experts are looking at efforts for preparations at known long-range missile launch sites.
Those signs may be appearing.
"North Korea's launch sites to fire off mid- and long-range missiles have recently shown increased movement of vehicles and forces," according to one South Korean official who described the activity at the sites as "brisk."
"We are closely watching possibilities of missile launches," the official said.
In this connection, officials have seen several vehicles moving to the Tongchang-ri missile site on the western coast, in what appeared to them to be preparations for testing its long-range missiles.
Some observers, however, believe the latest threats of a pre-emptive nuclear strike against the U.S. remain for now just domestic posturing and efforts to establish military credentials on Kim's part to show that he is more forceful than his father.
In other efforts to determine warnings and indications of an attack, analysts are looking for major troop movements, although none has been detected to date.
Late last week, a North Korean Mig-21 fighter jet flew near South Korea's front line airspace, known as the Tactical Action Line,but returned to base, according to a South Korean military official. In response, the South Koreans scrambled a KF-16 fighter.
The TAL is the point between 20 and 50 kilometers north of South Korean airspace that will prompt the South Korea to scramble its fighter jets.
In addition, border crossings between North and South Korea remain open, for now.
In one video, North Korea shows a nuclear attack on Washington:
http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/u-s-on-alert-for-overhead-nuclear-blast/#ooid=lzdG5hYTqwLYj4AjqhzzwQjFkN2n5m8q
Back in February, it released a video that showed a nuclear attack on New York City, against a musical backdrop of "We are the World," a song by the late Michael Jackson.
http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/u-s-on-alert-for-overhead-nuclear-blast/#ooid=k3cGI0OToSzIIm_VjVv-Ovb8PQcpJX6V
http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/u-s-on-alert-for-overhead-nuclear-blast/



They Are Gearing Up For Something Big–His Exact Words Were, `They Are Shipping Some Serious S*** Over There" –Barksdale AFB

I just spoke with a close associate who has been working for the last three years at Barksdale AFB, on various construction projects. Likely, you will not remember that I wrote you about 6 weeks ago to ask for prayers for people in that area. This man is just a guy...a construction worker...been there all his life...salt of the earth kind of guy. In his words..."I am just a working man...doing the best I can do."

To let you know, I have cautioned him, and literally begged him to leave that area...but he wants to hang on for as long as he can, so that he can tell people what he is seeing, and hearing...but it may be that he is finally rattled enough to pick up stakes and get out of there now. I am praying that he gets out soon.

Tonight, he called to let me know that the security and activity at Barksdale has been stepped up in his words, "by 300%".

I asked as many questions as I felt that I could and took notes so that I could simply use his quotes to accurately report what he has stated.

"We were working on a scheduled job in the munitions dump area...building new blast walls, when AF personnel came in and told us we had to leave right now. We asked if were being given a "work stoppage order." They replied "Get out now." and escorted us out. "More like they rushed us out."

On April 1, AF Chief of Staff and a bunch of other DoD dignitaries flew in to Barksdale. Those coming on the base usually have a sidearm and maybe a rifle, but since the 1st, "dignitaries are also wearing flak jackets."

"They are gearing up for something big."

"They are bringing in serious junk."

"Moving in warheads...I was working in an area where cruise missiles are brought in, put together, armed, and shipped out."

His exact words were, "They are shipping some serious s*** over there."

(Here I tried to ascertain whether these were going on ships or planes.)

He replied that "they are going everywhere." He also stated that "they dropped a bunch dummy bombs on some islands off the coast of North Korea"..(I just read a confirmation of that from an intelligence newsletter, and confirmed by WND an hour ago.)

I asked him if Chinese officers were still on base. He replied that he had not been working in the area in which he first saw them, for the last three weeks, but he did say this..."The Chinese and the Russians are here...let me put it this way...everybody in the UN plus a few more are in here. (US)"

He heard and directly quoted one officer referring to the testing of anti-ballistic missile defense system, "We are going to see a real test, now." He then said that he heard "Intelligence says there will be an attack on American soil."

He then stated that these defense missile systems were " being shipped to several bases."

Now he is a construction worker, and has been on the base which has contracted the company he works for, with over 40 different jobs. He said that in those three years, he has never seen it this way. His overwhelming impression is that our forces are mostly scattered, a huge number of foreign military personnel are in the US, many foreign officers have been at Barksdale for about 6 weeks that he knows of, and that "anything can happen," and "it looks like it will happen real quick."

I'll translate that last statement in case you don't speak "Southern"...

What he meant by that is that whatever is actually going on, North Korea notwithstanding, something is about to happen, it is about to happen soon, and there is no way we will ever be able to know the truth about it, who did what, when, where and why, but that whatever it is, we are sitting ducks for anything."

He said, "You know, when I was in school, there was always somebody pushing for a fight, trying to start a fight, or get a fight stirred up. That is what this reminds me of...when I was in school...and somebody always wanted to see a fight."

He then asked for prayers. So I am asking you to join in prayers for him...for all of them...
Apr 5, 2013
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/04/they-are-gearing-up-for-something-big-his-exact-words-were-they-are-shipping-some-serious-s-2612024.html
http://www.stevequayle.com/index.php?s=33&d=339

"STAND WITH THE MAASAI"

Reader, link: "STAND WITH THE MAASAI"

Posted By: hobie [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 5-Apr-2013 16:13:04

(Thanks, B. :) This past Saturday at Whole Foods, I noticed some hand-beaded bracelets and other items, made by Maasai women. I was surprised - "What's brought these here, right now?" I wondered. Might be related to the following: Reader B. sends us this link: Stand with the Maasai! http://soundofheart.org/galacticfreepress/content/stand-maasai Apparently the Tanzanian government is renewing efforts to grab Maasai land and force them to leave. The petition at AVAAZ.org has 1,264,000+ signatures already. They're shooting for 1,500,000: http://www.avaaz.org/en/stand_with_the_maasai_loc/?bBXBHab&v=23734 ************************************************************************* http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=273401

Annunaki, Iraq & Pearl Harbor

Annunaki, Iraq & Pearl Harbor

Posted By: Lion [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 5-Apr-2013 15:09:39

-------------- Annunaki, Iraq & Pearl Harbor Latest Posts: Annunaki, Iraq & Pearl Harbor Rockefellers, Crown Cocaine & Haitian Slavery Illuminati Mind Control & the Report from Iron Mountain Tuesday, April 2nd, 2013 | Posted by Dean Henderson Annunaki, Iraq & Pearl Harbor Vetrans Today http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/04/02/annunaki-iraq-pearl-harbor/ -------------------- Tuesday, April 2nd, 2013 | Posted by Dean Henderson Annunaki, Iraq & Pearl Harbor by Dean Henderson The process of stealing Iraq’s oil began when the Illuminati bankers baited Saddam Hussein into invading Iran. While Saddam was preoccupied with the Iranians, the puppet Kuwaiti government busied itself slowly moving its long-disputed border with Iraq northward into the area containing the massive Rumaila oilfield, which the Four Horsemen now knew to be one of the richest in the world. There the Kuwaitis established military installations, farms and oil facilities. The expansion added 900 square miles to Kuwait and gave them control over the southern portion of Rumaila, which contains the largest portion of its estimated 30 billion barrels of oil. Iraq’s oil terminal at Fao was destroyed during the Iran/Iraq War, crippling Iraqi National Oil Company (INOC) production at North Rumaila. Iraq wanted to lease the islands of Warbah and Bubiyan from Kuwait to serve as deep sea ports that could replace Fao. The Kuwaitis refused. In 1981 the Kuwait Oil Company (KOC) bought Sante Fe Drilling Corporation and its high-tech engineering subsidiary Braun. Sante Fe was a known CIA front. Braun had devised a new slant drilling technique. Throughout the 1980’s KOC used this technology to drill horizontally into the Rumaila oilfield, 90% of which fell within Iraqi territory. [1] The Iraqis said Kuwait stole $10 billion worth of crude oil. After the Gulf War, Sante Fe continued to steal Iraqi oil. In April 1993 Kenneth Beaty, head of exploration for Sante Fe, was arrested by the Iraqi government when he was found inside Iraq checking an oil well at Rumaila. He was sentenced to eight years at Abu Ghraib prison on trespassing charges. [2] Estimates of Iraqi crude reserves continue to climb. The current estimate is 112 billion barrels, second only to Saudi Arabia and up from 97 billion barrels just a decade ago. And much of Iraq remains unexplored. David Mangan Jr., editor of The Oil Daily, later said of the Gulf War, “It is most likely that the US plan from the beginning was to capture Southern Iraq because that land holds the richest oil fields on earth.” But Iraq contains something more important than oil. Rumaila lies at the heart of what was Mesopotamia, between the Tigres and Euphrates Rivers that drain into the Persian Gulf. The world’s most ancient writings are etched on Sumerian clay tablets buried beneath the muck at the estuaries of these great rivers. During biblical times the area was known as Chaldea. It was here, Anunnaki researchers say, where the Nubirian intruders chose to land, due to its plentiful supply of fossil fuels. According to foremost Anunnaki researcher Zecharia Sitchin, the Anunnaki constructed the Great Pyramids in Egypt as space beacons. NASA scientist Maurice Chatelain agrees, stating, “The Great Pyramid at Cheops was also a space beacon. From high above, the pyramid is visible at a very great distance…the polished stone surface is a radar reflector.” The Anunnaki landing facilities may have been in the Sinai Peninsula. Sinai means “shining” and, derived from name of the Babylonian god “Sin”. Sin was the Semetic name for Nannar, the firstborn son of Anunnaki leader Enlil, who was the sovereign of Ur, the home city of Ancient Mystery purveyor and possible Anunnaki hybrid Abraham. Sin was also the Chaldean name for the moon where, according to Sumerian tablets, the Anunnaki obtained the needed DNA for their human hybrid experiments. This adds a whole new meaning to the Old Testament mantra that man was born in sin. [3] “The Great Pyramid at Cheops was also a space beacon. From high above, the pyramid is visible at a very great distance…the polished stone surface is a radar reflector.” NASA scientist Maurice Chatelain Researchers claim the Egyptian King Ra was actually Marduk, son of Anunnaki commander Enki. Ra fathered Shu and Tefnut, who married each other and gave birth to Geg and Nut. They too married and spawned the Egyptian god-kings Isis and Osirus, along with the biblical Seth and Nephtys. The Anunnaki flight control center was at Mount Moriah, which translates “mount of directing”. [4] It was on this exact sight that King Solomon built his Temple, under which the Knights Templar excavated during the Crusades, making off with boatloads of gold, the Ark of the Covenant (possibly an Anunnaki radio transmitting device) and other sacred relics now guarded by the Priory of Sion. This southern portion of Iraq may contain valuable clues as to the origins of mankind, knowledge closely guarded by the Illuminati banker-led secret societies. The perpetual state of war with Iraq has put the area off limits to researchers, just as the number of people interested in the Anunnaki theories gains critical mass. When US forces invaded Iraq in 2003, organized “looters” carried away many important artifacts from Iraq’s National Museum. In June 1990 Iraq’s Ambassador to the US, Mohammed al-Mashat, appeared on CNN revealing US/Kuwaiti collaboration in destabilizing Iraq’s economy. Al-Mashat stated, “I have documents written by the CIA, detailing an economic destabilization program against Iraq involving Kuwaiti State Security. On November 14, 1989 CIA Director William Webster invited KSS officials to Washington to plan this destabilization effort.” [5] Al-Mashat read verbatim from the CIA document, which stated, “It is important to take advantage of the deteriorating economic situation in Iraq in order to put pressure on Iraq to delineate border situation. Broad cooperation should be initiated between us. The CIA will also train 128 elite Kuwaiti forces to protect the al-Sabah family. And we will help automate functions of the State Security Department and facilitate the exchange of information with Syria and Iran.” [6] Al-Mashat went on to say that Kuwait’s oil wealth was being deployed to bankroll mujahedeen rebel heroin trafficking in the Golden Crescent region. Just months before Mashat made this claim, a nephew of Kuwaiti emir Sheik Jaber Ahmed al-Sabah was arrested in France for possession of heroin. Part of the CIA/al-Sabah destabilization effort against Iraq involved driving world oil prices lower. At a May 1990 Arab Summit in Baghdad, Saddam Hussein said that for every $1 drop in the price of a barrel of oil Iraq was losing $1 billion/year. He called Kuwaiti overproduction of crude an “act of war”. Two months later he lodged a formal complaint with the Arab League calling Kuwait and UAE “imperialist agents” in the Gulf. King Hussein of Jordan concurred. In July 1990 OPEC held a meeting of oil ministers in Vienna where it was agreed that each member nation would lower production to avert further declines in an already weak oil market. A day after the meeting Kuwait announced that it had changed its mind and would increase production. KOC flooded an already oversupplied market with $13.25/barrel Kuwaiti Export crude. The UAE followed suit. Within three months Iraqi crude went from $28/barrel to $11, resulting in a loss of $14 billion in oil revenues. Iraq’s economy is oil-dependent. In 1988 oil provided 99.1% of Iraq’s hard currency. [7] Reeling under mountains of Iranian War debt, Iraq was now starved of the desperately needed foreign exchange required to service this debt and rebuild its shattered economy. Iraqi Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz penned a letter to the Secretary General of the League of Arab States complaining that Kuwait had, “implemented a plot to escalate the pace of the gradual, systematic advance toward Iraqi territory. The Kuwaiti government set up military installations, police posts, oil installations and farms on Iraqi territory”. But Aziz knew that a more powerful force stood squarely behind Kuwait’s audacious moves, stating, “We are sure that some Arab states are involved in a conspiracy against us. And we want you to know that our country will not kneel and our women will not become prostitutes and our children will not be barred from food. It is inconceivable that a regime such as that in Kuwait could risk engaging in a conspiracy of such a magnitude against a large, strong country such as Iraq if it were not being supported by a great power, and that power is the United States of America”. “It is important to take advantage of the deteriorating economic situation in Iraq in order to put pressure on Iraq to delineate border situation. Broad cooperation should be initiated between us. The CIA will also train 128 elite Kuwaiti forces to protect the al-Sabah family. And we will help automate functions of the State Security Department and facilitate the exchange of information with Syria and Iran.” [6] While Iraq’s greatest oilfield was being partitioned by the Four Horsemen and their Kuwaiti surrogates, the al-Sabah fiefdom was driving the price of oil into the ground, while demanding full repayment of the Iraq “grants”. In July 1990, as American warships conducted exercises in the Persian Gulf, Iraqi President Hussein met in Baghdad with US Ambassador to Iraq April Glaspie. Saddam registered his anger towards Kuwait’s economic warfare against Iraq. He told Glaspie he was considering taking military action against Kuwait to drive them out of the Rumaila oilfield. Glaspie said nothing to discourage Saddam, instead telling him, “We have no position regarding Arab/Arab conflicts”. On July 31 Assistant Secretary of State John Kelly gave his implicit blessing to Saddam’s plans saying, “We have no defense treaty relationship with any Gulf country. That is clear…we have historically avoided taking a position on border disputes”. Glaspie and Kelly were both lying and giving Saddam the green light to attack Kuwait. A few days later Iraqi Revolutionary Guards routed the Kuwaiti’s from Rumaila. Both a letter penned by President Bush to Saddam on July 28 and State Department instructions to Glaspie were withheld from a Senate committee investigating Glaspie’s and Kelly’s odd responses to Iraqi threats. State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said the documents were withheld to “permit Presidents and foreign leaders to talk freely”. Watch them All Die It wasn’t the first time a US President allowed bloodshed to provide a pretext for economically beneficial war, nor would it be the last. Bush’s “no response” to Saddam was reminiscent of the actions of FDR which led to the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor and US entry into WWII. A 1940 Gallup poll showed 83% of Americans were against US involvement in the war. The London banker crowd wanted US intervention to help cement the US/Britain “special relationship”, which serves as the neo-colonial paradigm of the day. FDR was himself a Wall Street insider. He only launched his populist New Deal to put a lid on revolutionary public anger caused by the Crash of 1929. His uncle Frederic Delano was a member of the first Federal Reserve Board. The 33rd Degree Mason and CFR insider needed a pretext to provide US troops for the defense of European monarchs, to which every Mason pledges his allegiance, wittingly or not. CFR started the ball rolling by encouraging FDR to send aid to China and to squeeze Japanese trade via naval blockades. FDR ordered the Pacific Fleet moved to vulnerable Pearl Harbor despite numerous intelligence reports of looming Japanese aggression and over the objections of Admiral James Richardson. In 1932 and 1938 the Navy conducted exercises in the presence of Japanese military attachés, simulating the destruction of the Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor. Six Japanese aircraft carriers disappeared from radar after seen sailing towards the US. US Army Chief of Staff George Marshall sent an ambiguous message to Pearl Harbor military commanders on November 27, 1941 that read, “Hostile action possible at any moment. If hostilities cannot be avoided the US desires that Japan commit the first overt act.” [8] Warnings came from FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, US Ambassador to Japan Joseph Grew, Brigadier General Elliot Thorpe in Java, and British and Dutch intelligence. On December 6th, US intelligence told Roosevelt that the Japanese carriers were 400 miles from Hawaii. Still, Roosevelt left most of the Pacific Fleet in port. On the night of December 6th, George Marshall and Navy Secretary Frank Knox huddled at the White House with FDR. Both later testified that they “did not recall their whereabouts”. While battleships and destroyers remained at Pearl Harbor, the more strategic aircraft carriers were moved. Not one was in Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. FDR knew air power was the key to defeating Japan. The “surprise” Japanese attack went forward and 2,400 Americans paid for the FDR deception with their lives. Another 1,200 were injured. The next day FDR addressed the nation and called for a declaration of war. Pearl Harbor ended US isolationism once and for all. FDR stated his position in a trans-Atlantic telephone conversation with British Prime Minister and fellow 33rd Degree Freemason Winston Churchill, stating, “A Japanese attack on us, which would result in war…would certainly fulfill two of the most important requirements of our policy…What I don’t know, can’t hurt me”. [9] As Professor Stuart Crane put it, “If you look back at every war in Europe you will see that they always ended up with the establishment of a balance of power. With every reshuffling there was a balance of power in a new grouping around the House of Rothschild in England, France or Austria. They grouped nations so that if any King got out of line, a war would break out and the war would be decided by which way the financing went. Researching the debt positions of warring nations will usually indicate who was being punished.” In 1939, North Dakota Senator Gerald Nye drew the nation’s attention to a document titled The Next War, which stated, “To persuade her (America) to take part will be much more difficult. It will need a definite threat to America…The position will be naturally eased if Japan were involved…the old goddess of democracy routine”. FDR’s son-in-law Curtis Dall said of the powers looming behind FDR, “For a long time I felt that he…developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country. But he didn’t. Most of his thoughts were carefully manufactured for him by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group.” [10] As Professor Stuart Crane put it, “If you look back at every war in Europe you will see that they always ended up with the establishment of a balance of power. With every reshuffling there was a balance of power in a new grouping around the House of Rothschild in England, France or Austria. They grouped nations so that if any King got out of line, a war would break out and the war would be decided by which way the financing went. Researching the debt positions of warring nations will usually indicate who was being punished.” The international bankers now prepared to punish Iraq. Shortly after Iraq attacked Kuwait Jordan’s King Hussein joined with Algerian President Chadli Benjladid to organize an Arab League Summit in Algiers to try and head off a full-scale war. Saddam agreed to pull his troops from Kuwait while the summit proceeded. But Egypt, with backing from the US and Britain, convinced 14 of the 21 foreign ministers in attendance to denounce Iraq. The peace effort fell apart. The Bilderbergers would have their bloodbath. ------------------- On October 5, 1990 Iraq’s Ambassador to the UN Sabah Talat Kadrat stated to the General Assembly, “America and its Western allies are seeking, through this military, political and informational campaign; to gain control over the oil wells and to impose imperialist political, economic and military hegemony over the world, and over the Third World countries in particular.” Dean Henderson is the author of four books: Big Oil & Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families & Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics & Terror Network, The Grateful Unrich: Revolution in 50 Countries, Stickin’ it to the Matrix and Das Kartell der Federal Reserve. To subscribe to Dean’s weekly blog, Left Hook, go to www.deanhenderson.wordpress.com ---------------------- http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=273397