This master plan resurfaced during
a visit to the Pentagon by General Wesley Clark the Ex NATO Supreme
Commander Europe when after two visits he was told they were going to take
out Iraq………on his second visit he was told by that same person that it was
going to be more than Iraq and turned out to be at least 7 countries………ok
so you don’t believe me take a look at these two links:
Here is confirmation of the status
of General Clark:
We have since observed that John
;">
General Wesley Clark commanded
Operation Allied Force in the Kosovo War during his term as the Supreme
Allied Commander Europe of NATO from 1997 to 2000………….I would like to
remind you all that NATO is the military arm of the New World Order.
Clark joined the 2004 race for the
Democratic Party Presidential nomination as a candidate on September 17,
2003, but withdrew from the primary race on February 11, 2004, after
winning the Oklahoma state primary, endorsing and campaigning for the
eventual Democratic nominee, John Kerry.
We have since observed that John
Kerry has taken over from the “Old Nag” Hilary Clinton as United States
Secretary of State.
—————————–
Are we now looking down the barrel
of yet another “Gulf of Tonkin False Flag Potential” that started the
Vietnam War but t
The main infrastructure of the New
World Order has Israel and Zionists (Both Christian and Jewish) at
its heart!!
For obvious reasons I have had to
hold fire on myld Order, is their greatest
obstacle and it is China that is fast becoming a major super power in both
the military sense and financial sense.
When one considers that the New
World Order is currently in a state of collapse and the fact that they will
loose control of the World’s Collateral Accounts and substantial wealth
associated with those accounts it is easy to see why they are now switching
their attention away from their failed campaign in the Middle East and now
diverting their attention to No4; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif;">
Again one must understand how
important it is for the cabal to enter into WWIII in order for them to
extend their survivability and at the same time to be given the opportunity
to go up against possible Russia or China………….the latter would be to their
advantage as China, according to the New World Order, is their greatest
obstacle and it is China that is fast becoming a major super power in both
the military sense and financial sense.
When one considers that the New
World Order is currently in a state of collapse and the fact that they will
loose control of the World’s Collateral Accounts and substantial wealth
associated with those accounts it is easy to see why they are now switching
their attention away from their failed campaign in the Middle East and now
diverting their attention to North Korea whom they have been intimidating
for some considerable time!!
Imagine if they could start WWIII
and pull in China……what better way for them to possibly gain some ground
and even reduce their debt to China!!
We see all those in authority now
saying that North Korea is making direct threats against the USA especially
in regard to possible nuclear missile attacks etc but this is a mix of
words because North Korea is stating that “If Attacked it will carry out
reprisal attacks using its advanced technologies” etc…….its all a war of
wards at the moment but given one simple mistake or false flag (as per
Vietnam) we could see WWIII become a reality.
For those thick skulled leaders and
experts who think this is good I would like to remind you of the
“Catastrophic Consequences” should they bring about a war.
Can any of you even imagine the
west using Depleted Uranium Weapons and Low Yield Nuclear Weapons
(such as the B61 etc) on nuclear facilities and what that would do to the
world’s environment?
It would make Nagasaki and
Hiroshima look rather miniscule by comparison!!
We would have immediate radioactive
contamination and the distribution of millions upon millions of radioactive
nano particles spreading around the region covering from India in the West
to the Western Seaboard of the US in the east and from North China in
the North to the Philippines in the south within one week and the rest of
the world within a month.
I have many times published my own
upper wind charts showing how this contamination is distributed both by
normal air flows and jet streams and by any existing monsoonal flows as the
charts below show………….under these charts you can also see a graph that
showed very high radioactive contamination in the general Greater London
area as a direct result of the Coalition attack on Baghdad and on the Tora
Bora mountains in Afghanistan……this is factual forensic evidence……..how
could anyone in their right mind support such action……….but hey don’t
listen to me just continue watching your favorite programmes on TV and
watch the world go by and suffer the consequences of an alarming increase
in cancers, especially in our babies,children and grandchildren!!!!!!!
—————————————
Let me know evaluate everything and
hopefully at the same time allow you the readers to better understand
this New World Order mentality and at the same time ask you “Where
lies the true axis of evil” ?………..certainly not in some far away Islamic
country or some CIA fictitious group they call Al Qaeda, Syria, Iran or
North Korea but right here in the heart of our own leaders and
governments!!!
—————————————
I would first ask you all a
question that if a combined military force assembled off the coast of the
US, UK Australia or wherever and started conducting high intensity military
exercises (war games) including live firing of missiles, bombs, shells
etc extremely close to your borders, would you be concerned?
If at the same time there was a
small group of islands that you believe belonged to you but for some reason
were being held in dispute suddenly became surrounded by that same force,
would you be concerned?
If those same countries also
imposed an embargo of your territory or imposed severe sanctions would be
concerned and feel intimidated?
If those same countries were
allowed to test fire or create their own Weapons of Mass Destruction and
also pass them on to their allies to be placed close to your borders or to
fly in additional aircraft to support a potential strike would you be
concerned and feel threatened?
I am sure that we would all come up
with the same answer “YES.”
So lets look at the more recent
historical incidents that has led to North Korea responding in such a way
and also look at some western media coverage showing a distinct Zionist
(propaganda) stance:
Disputed Border
The disputed maritime border
between North and South Korea in the West Sea
A: United Nations-created Northern Limit Line, 1953
B: North Korea-declared “Inter-Korean MDL”, 1999 The locations of
specific islands are reflected in the configuration of each maritime
boundary, including
1. Yeonpyeong Island
2. Baengnyeog Island
3. Daecheong Island
Having studied international
maritime law and the current The United Nations Convention on the Law of
the Sea (UNCLOS) criteria one can clearly see that North Korea certainly
has credibility for its claim to these islands. However it remains a
disputed border.
With this in mind one should never
allow such military activity to occur at such locations because of the
inherent risks of a simple misunderstanding or stray munitions turning into
further escalation or full blown conflict. This has almost occurred on
previous occasions such as:
The bombardment of Yeonpyeong was
an artillery engagement between the North Korean military and South Korean
forces stationed on Yeonpyeong Island on 23 November 2010. Following a
South Korean artillery exercise in waters in the south, North Korean forces
fired around 170 artillery shells and rockets at Yeonpyeong Island, hitting
both military and civilian targets.
The shelling caused widespread
damage on the island, killing four South Koreans and injuring 19. South
Korea retaliated by shelling North Korean gun positions. The North Koreans
subsequently stated that they had responded to South Korean shells being
fired into North Korean territorial waters.
The incident caused an escalation
of tension on the Korean Peninsula and prompted widespread international
condemnation of the North’s actions. The United Nations declared it to be
one of the most serious incidents since the end of the Korean War, and by
December 18 former UN ambassador Bill Richardson said tensions had
escalated to become “the most serious crisis on the Korean peninsula since
the 1953 armistice which ended the Korean War.” (note this incident was
after the Cheonan sinking).
We must also go back even further
to see another incident which
The Battle of Daecheong was a
skirmish between the South and the North navies near the Northern Limit
Line (NLL) on 10 November 2009 off Daecheong Island. A patrol boat from the
North (DPRK) was seriously damaged while the navy of the South (ROK)
sustained no casualties.
According to western media:
The incident began around 11:27 am
when a North Korean navy patrol boat crossed down through the NLL, which is
not recognized by the DPRK following two warnings from South Korean
naval units. After one more warning announcement, one of the South Korean
patrol boats fired a warning shot. In response, the North Korean boat began
firing upon the South Korean ship. This resulted in a short exchange of
fire between the sides. The North Korea vessel expended approximately
50 rounds, and the South Korean craft returned fire with 200 rounds.
So one can see how intimidation by
the west can get totally out of control and how this lead to the major
incident that occurred with the South Korean Corvette – Cheonan only this
time the North were not involved and clearly became a more modern day “Gulf
of Tonkin Incident” which was another false flag that started the war in
Vietnam!!!
The ROKS Cheonan sinking
occurred on 26 March 2010, when the Cheonan, a Republic of Korea Navy ship
carrying 104 personnel, sank off the country’s west coast near Baengnyeong
Island in the Yellow Sea, killing 46 seamen. A South Korean-led official
investigation carried out by a team of international experts from South
Korea, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Sweden presented
a summary of its investigation on 20 May 2010, concluding that the warship
had been sunk by a North Korean torpedo fired by a midget submarine.
North Korea denied that it was
responsible for the sinking. North Korea’s further offer to aid an
open investigation was disregarded The Peoples Republic of China
dismissed the official scenario presented by South Korea and the United
States as not credible. An investigation by the Russian Navy also did
not concur with the report. The United Nations Security Council made a
Presidential Statement condemning the attack but without identifying the
attacker…………….note the latter comment which did not identify the
attacker…….had the UN done so it would have got egg all over its face when
everyone knew this was clearly a false flag!!
I printed an article about this
incident which I repeat below:
Was
the sinking of the South Korean Warship a False Flag?
So many times we hear or read about
conspiracy theories or false flag operations whereby the CIA, Mossad or
other secret service operatives create an incident and then conveniently
point the finger at a country or organisation with whom that have a bone of
contention.
I actually have a special interest
in this particular incident having spent much time working with submarines
both operationally and also whilst working on-board a torpedo recovery
vessel (TRV). During my time in the navy I also worked on minesweepers and
so got to understand all aspects of underwater warfare. One certainly has
to keep an open mind on the sinking of the Cheonan as several methods could
have been used.
The possibilities are endless
ranging from torpedoes, to limpet mines to many other types of mines – Acoustic
Mines – Magnetic Mines and Contact Mines all of which can either be moored
to the ocean floor or just sit on the bottom. Some mines can actually
release a homing torpedo when an enemy vessels approaches.
One should also keep in mind that
there are also options as to how this incident occurred that resulted in
yet another “False Flag” incident hyped up by the US. It could have been a
friendly fire incident or an intentional act by using an ally torpedo or a
moored mine both of which have the ability to split the ship in two.
Maybe many of you are
convinced and happy to accept the South Korean version of this event but
you must all fully understand those that carried out the inquiry were all
allies of South Korea and no independent analysis was ever carried out. I
therefore hope that when you have read this article you may be totally
convinced or maybe have some doubt in your mind as to the true facts behind
this incident.
One must fully understand that this
particular area is a very sophisticated training ground for Anti Submarine
Warfare (ASW) and accordingly would be extremely well protected against any
intrusion by other vessel and or submarines. It is also important to keep
in mind that this same area is also carefully monitored by China and Russia
who have some very sophisticated equipment and apparatus to watch over
every aspect of the Korean Peninsular.
The sinking of the South Korean
Corvette Cheonan took place on the evening of March the 26th2010
at 2122 local time in total darkness. The location was just offshore on the
southwest corner of Baengnyeong Island which sits very close to the border
with North Korea. The island is a hub for the South Korean military and is
also a very active area for war games with many other nations, especially
the United States Navy which I will explain below.
Baengnyeong Island is a Secret
Joint US-South Korean Naval Base for anti-submarine warfare (ASW)
operations. The surrounding waters are relatively void of any civilian
vessels making it a perfect location for a multitude of naval exercises.
What is more important is the solitude and silence in its waters making it
a good location to install sonar listening devices which one normally
associated with areas used for submarine training and anti submarine
training. One could also assume that it would also be a good location for
mine laying and mine sweeping activities as well as regular exercise in
submarine hunting by both surface craft and submarines. Add to this both
surface and sub-sea training by the US Navy Seals
It is very important to fully
understand that this location would be very heavy protected by Land Sea and
Air. The lack of en route traffic would also make it a perfect listening
ground for approaching vessels, submarines or any other craft as well as
any weapons that were release by a submarine such as a torpedo or
underwater launched missile. The joint US-South Korean naval base is
staffed by American and South Korean naval special operation force
personnel and accordingly uses extremely sophisticated weapons and
apparatus.
Obviously one would first ask
the question that if the US and South Korean Navy monitor the North Korean
Navy at all times and knew that certain vessels had left their base how is
it possible for any vessel to sneak into a highly protected zone
undetected. In this case it was in relatively shallow water and well within
the sonar listening zone. One should also remember that the local US Naval
Commander himself declared that there was no North Korean activity in the
area.
Let’s just read some comments
from experts who know this area extremely well and who also believe this
was certainly a “False Flag” as I do:
The March attack on the South
Korean Navy anti-submarine warfare (ASW) corvette, the Cheonan, was a false
flag attack designed to appear as coming from North Korea.
One of the main purposes for
increasing tensions on the Korean peninsula was to apply pressure on
Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama to reverse course on moving the U.S.
Marine Corps base off Okinawa. Hatoyama has admitted that the tensions over
the sinking of the Cheonan played a large part in his decision to allow the
U.S. Marines to remain on Okinawa.
The Cheonan was sunk near
Baengnyeong Island, a westernmost spot that is far from the South Korean
coast, but opposite the North Korean coast. The island is heavily
militarized and within artillery fire range of North Korean coastal
defenses, which lie across a narrow channel.
The Cheonan, an ASW corvette, was
decked out with state-of-the-art sonar, plus it was operating in waters
with extensive hydrophone sonar arrays and acoustic underwater sensors.
There is no South Korean sonar or audio evidence of a torpedo, submarine or
mini-sub in the area. Since there is next to no shipping in the channel,
the sea was silent at the time of the sinking.
However, Baengnyeong Island hosts a
joint US-South Korea military intelligence base and the US Navy SEALS
operate out of the base. In addition, four U.S. Navy ships were in the
area, part of the joint U.S-South Korean Exercise Foal Eagle, during the
sinking of the Cheonan. Investigations of the suspect torpedo’s metallic
and chemical fingerprints show it to be of German manufacture. There are
suspicions that the US Navy SEALS maintains a sampling of European
torpedoes for sake of plausible deniability for false flag attacks.
Germany does not sell torpedoes to
North Korea, however, Germany does maintain a close joint submarine and
submarine weapons development program with Israel and as we know these
submarines passed through the Suez Canal some time ago. The Republic of
Korea Navy also just happens to operates type 214 submarines, also built
and exported from Germany. These submarines use 533mm DM2A3 torpedoes that
have a striking resemblance to the parts that were recovered from the sea
bed in the vicinity of the Cheonan sinking.
The presence of the USNS Salvor,
one of the participants in Foal Eagle, so close to Baengnyeong Island
during the sinking of the South Korean corvette also raises questions. The
Salvor, a civilian Navy salvage ship, which participated in mine laying
activities for the Thai Marines in the Gulf of Thailand in 2006, was
present near the time of the blast with a complement of 12 deep sea divers.
Beijing, satisfied with North
Korea’s Kim Jong Il’s claim of innocence after a hurried train trip from
Pyongyang to Beijing, suspects the U.S. Navy’s role in the Cheonan’s
sinking, with particular suspicion on the role of the Salvor. The
suspicions are as follows:
1. The Salvor engaged in a seabed
mine-installation operation, in other words, attaching horizontally fired
anti-submarine mines on the sea floor in the channel.
2. The Salvor was doing routine
inspection and maintenance on seabed mines, and put them into an electronic
active mode (hair trigger release) as part of the inspection program.
3. A SEALS diver attached a
magnetic mine to the Cheonan, as part of a covert program aimed at
influencing public opinion in South Korea, Japan and China.
The Korean peninsula tensions have
conveniently overshadowed all other agenda items on Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton’s visits to Beijing and Seoul.
What is also remarkable about the
sinking of the Cheonan was the fact that the Director of the South Korean
National Intelligence – Won See-hoon told the South Korean Parliamentary
Committee in early April, less that two weeks after the incident that there
was no evidence linking North Korea to the sinking.
South Korea’s Minister of Defence
Kim Tae-young also backed him up by saying that the crew of the stricken
corvette had not detected a torpedo.
It was also interesting to learn
that the Head of the Marine Operations Office at the South Korean Joint
Chiefs of Staff agreed that “No North Korean Warships have been detected in
the waters where the accident took place.”
Defense Ministry officials added
that they had not detected any North Korean submarines in the area at the
time of the incident
When speculation persisted that the
Cheonan had been sunk by a North Korean torpedo, the Defense Ministry
called another press conference to reiterate “there was no unusual North
Korean activities detected at the time of the disaster.”
A ministry spokesman, Won Tae-jae,
told reporters that “With regard to this case, no particular activities by
North Korean submarines or semi-submarines…have been verified. I am saying again
that there were no activities that could be directly linked to” the
Cheonan’s sinking.
Rear Admiral Lee, the head of the
marine operations office, added that, “We closely watched the movement of
the North’s vessels, including submarines and semi-submersibles, at the
time of the sinking. But military did not detect any North Korean
submarines near the country’s western sea border.”
So, a North Korean submarine is now
said to have fired a torpedo which sank the Cheonan, but in the immediate
aftermath of the sinking the South Korean navy detected no North Korean
naval vessels, including submarines, in the area. Indeed, immediately
following the incident defense minister Lee ruled out a North Korean
torpedo attack, noting that a torpedo would have been spotted, and no
torpedo had been spotted.
Finally we have the statement made
by the South Korean Coast Guard Captain Go Yeong-jae who rescued 56 of the
stricken warship’s crew, he “received an order …that a naval patrol
vessel had run aground in the waters 1.2 miles to the
southwest of Baengnyeong Island, and that we were to move there quickly to
rescue them.”
The Cheonan incident certainly
indicates yet another US, South Korea or possibly Israel concocted story
that resembles another false flag incident that occurred during the
Viet Nam War in the Gulf of Tonkin, in which the US fabricated a story
about North Vietnam sinking the USS Maddox. This was used as an excuse to
attack North Vietnam. Now we see America, South Korea and possibly Israel
fabricating evidence in order to carry out an aggressive strategy towards
North Korea under the pretext of “self-defense.” What is also another most
important part of this cover up was Clinton visit to Japan re the possible
closure of a US Marine air base.
Let’s now turn to the evidence and
prove that the South Korean Government with the help of the investigation
team from the US, Sweden, Australia and the UK tried to deceive the
international media into believing their analysis was correct.
When the South Korean Government
did their first major press conference they very carefully created a full
sized copy of the CHT-02D (which they say was used by the North Korean Navy
in this incident). They just happened to obtain a copy of a brochure for
this torpedo which they say is used to promote sales of the torpedo to
overseas customers. (as shown above)
They even went a stage further to
show a full scale drawing that was held up above the recovered parts to
show that it was this actual torpedo that sank the Cheonan. However, many
people noticed that this certainly was not the case as the scale and design
of the rear part of the torpedo did not match the drawing.
After some time the South
Korean Government then produced another black and white detailed diagram
that resembled the actual parts located and made a statement that they had
rushed the original drawing to show the media and accordingly had made some
mistakes. My question would be “How is this possible if the brochure was
the actual brochure produced by the North Korean for their export
market”?
I then decide to put the two
drawings together and compare both with the actual recovered parts and
again we can see that not only do the diagrams not align but also the
propeller on the parts recovered is a much more sophisticated design in the
aero dynamical sense. Also note the corrosion of the metal and prop which
would indicate a longer period of time in the water and also longer period
of oxidization once taken out of the water. The maximum time the remnants
of the actual torpedo that they claim sank the Cheonan was seven weeks.
The actual weapon used to sink this
vessel was either a German manufactured torpedo or a moored submerged mine
of possible US design both of which were capable of splitting the Cheonan
in two as you can see in the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oUNt47G-08
When one looks at the more modern
German DM2A3 you can see a striking resemblance, not only in the design of
the tail and propeller but also in its colour. You will note that the base
colour of the German torpedo is the same as the parts that were put on
public display
I have to say that yet again
we see a classic US generated “False Flag” operation that in this case
could take South Korea, US and allies to yet another war!
It is time that the people of the
world, in particular those that live in the US, see through this false
façade and stop these tyrants in their tracks. The axis of evil is not in
some distant land but in minds of such people as Kissinger, Bush, Rumsfeld,
Cheney, Clinton and all those that have and continue to surround them. The
ultimate responsibility for these evil actions must clearly rest on the
shoulders of the Presidents and Prime Ministers of those countries who
participate in such actions.
I will close off this article with
a famous saying by Gandhi that adds meaning to this particular article:
“When I despair, I remember that all through history the way
of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and
for a time they seem invincible but in the end, they always fall — think of
it, ALWAYS.”
End of original article
————————–
To look deeper into the current crisis
we need to look at the situation as it stands today and what the western
media are saying about this…………the following extraction is from the The New
York Times and written by Choe Sang-Hun and David E. Sanger – published
29th March 2013
SEOUL, South Korea — This week,
North Korea’s young leader, Kim Jung-un, ordered his underlings to prepare
for a missile attack on the United States. He appeared at a command center
in front of a wall map with the bold, unlikely title, “Plans to Attack the
Mainland U.S.” Earlier in the month, his generals boasted of developing a
“Korean-style” nuclear warhead that could be fitted atop a long-range
missile.
Kim Jong-un, the North Korean
leader, met with military leaders in Pyongyang on Friday. Some of the
photos of military preparedness released by Korea appear to be digitally
manipulated.
But the missile systems that figure
in Mr. Kim’s blitz of threats and orders do not yet have the range to
approach American shores. There is no evidence his nuclear weapons can be
shrunk to fit atop a missile. And a prominent photograph showing Mr. Kim’s
military making a Normandy-style beach landing appears to have been
manufactured, raising questions about whether his forces could possibly
repeat the feat his grandfather pulled off in 1950, ordering a ground
attack to open the Korean War.
On top of all that, most countries
on the verge of a major military assault do not broadcast their battle
plans to the world.
“You would expect such a military
order to be issued in secret,” said Kim Min-seok, spokesman of the South
Korean Defense Ministry. “We believe that by revealing it to the media and
publicizing it to the world, North Korea is playing psychology.”
In fact, it is the abilities that
Mr. Kim is not showing off that have the Obama administration most worried.
The cyberattacks on South Korea’s banking system and television
broadcasters two weeks ago were surprisingly successful, as was the torpedo
attack three years ago this week on the Cheonan, a naval corvette, that
killed 46 South Korean sailors. The North has never acknowledged
involvement in either — though the South believes it was responsible for
both and so do American experts.
“We’re convinced this is about Kim
solidifying his place with his own people and his own military, who still
don’t know him,” one senior administration official said Friday. He added,
“We’re worried about what he’s going to do next, but we’re not worried
about what he seems to be threatening to do next.”
The cyberattacks and torpedo attack
have something in common: Unlike the missile attacks and beach landings
that Mr. Kim seems to be suggesting are imminent, they are hard to trace to
North Korea, at least immediately. As a result, they are hard to retaliate
against, and in fact the South never struck back militarily for the sinking
of the Cheonan, even after a commission of inquiry, with experts from
outside South Korea, concluded it was the work of a submarine-launched
torpedo.
To North Korea experts in
Washington and Seoul, there is something familiar in the country’s threats
to “keep the White House in the cross hairs of our long-range missiles.”
Such threat of armed brinkmanship — the catchphrase in the 1990s was that
Seoul would become a “sea of fire,” a term recently revived by North
Korea’s news agencies — has in the past drawn its adversaries to the
bargaining table with economic concessions. But at the same time, the
tensions with the outside world provide the government with opportunities to
elevate its leader’s status among his people — which might be more
important to a young, untested leader than it was to his father and
grandfather.
According to the view that North
Korea’s propaganda machine pounds into its citizens’ minds, the North is a
tiny nation besieged by hostile outside forces, one that survived despite
decades of sanctions and can finally stand up to both its longtime Chinese
ally and American enemy — all thanks to the strong “military-first”
leadership of the Kim family and the country’s nuclear arsenal.
In such a setting, Mr. Kim’s trip
to a border island on a wooden boat — it almost seemed designed to create a
“Washington crossing the Delaware” motif — is proof of his “daring and
pluck,” as the country’s main party newspaper, Rodong, explained. Rodong
also declared about North Korea’s nuclear weapons: “Let the American
imperialists and their followers know! We are not a pushover like Iraq or
Libya.” The first, famously, had no nuclear weapons; the second gave up its
nascent nuclear program in late 2003, a move North Korea describes as Col.
Muammar el-Qaddafi’s greatest mistake.
Choe Sang-Hun reported from Seoul,
South Korea, and David E. Sanger from Washington.
—————————–
I did not put anymore of this
dribble in my article for obvious reasons as my intention is to show you
both sides of the coin!!
—————————————–
The most important aspect of this
article is to clarify who is indeed the aggressor………if any country
continues to harass or carry out war games in and around disputed
territories or impose harsh sanctions then one can expect the victims of
that aggression to respond……….it is clear that the main aggressor is the
United States.
When we read the highly censored
news they tell us that North Korea is a clear danger and that they have
approved plans in motion to strike the US with nuclear weapons etc………this
is a very warped interpretation of what North Korea has actually
said………..their response is that “if you attack me I will carry out reprisal
attacks against you”……this is not rocket science it is a common understand
by any country that whoever carries out the first strike brings that
country into war and thus a reprisal attack is not only expected but is
also duty bound!!!!
In closing I want you all to
remember the victims of our thirst to go to war and realise that what goes
around comes around and that you yourself, no matter what country you
reside, in will eventually succumb to such contamination…….especially
anything on the scale of going to war with Iran or North Korea……be warned
and stop the New World Order and NATO from any further conflicts!!
How would you like to live in the
Balkans – Kuwait – Iraq – Afghanistan – Yemen – Somalia – North Pakistan –
South Lebanon – Gaza and be subjected to this type of treatment? Could you
still smile like this very brave boy?
Peter Eyre – 5/4/2013
Broadcaster – Investigative
Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis
2 comments:
there are some screwed up people, if we must call them that, running this show.
How the hell did we get here, and how do we get bsck.
First of all by boycotting the products that finance them, not buying their commercial products, these are the same which finance Palestine massacre, so every product from Israel of produced by jewish companies. FInd out the list on line, is a very long one and spread the voice to everyone you know. It is not a lot but if we all do that it will be something.
Post a Comment