Day 1 of the Citizens Hearing and more...

In This Update...

Day 1 of the Citizens Hearing

Posted by Steve Beckow

It’s thrilling to watch the Citizens Hearing on Disclosure and realize that this discussion, which follows on from the 2001 press conference that Dr. Steven Greer held, is actually establishing the conversation, a sociologist might prefer to say, “the discourse” on extraterrestrial contact.
The discussion is ground-breaking and, like all ground-breaking conversations, goes on in the language of discourse accepted by the larger population but also by the target opposition – some in the space industry, the military, government, and the secret government. It does not step outside existing paradigms and it’s probably wise that it doesn’t.
It establishes in the language of common acceptance to the players what the historical record is. And if this be not enough to break the public’s conviction that we’re alone in the universe, then only the fabled landing on the White House lawn may convince remaining skeptics.
At the same time, I have to say, at the risk of being considered somehow ungrateful, that I’m also wistful. I’m wistful because our knowledge of matters goes beyond existing discourse. But our discussion goes on outside existing paradigms and so would not be accepted by many parties to the discussion. So I don’t hear there what we know here. And I hunger for the day when we do.
For instance, I’ve just heard Linda Moulton Howe explain how 1945 is important for the study of contact because the nuclear explosions of that year made the subject one of importance to national security for our governments. So those explosions tell us why our governments’ interest in the subject began with such focus around that time and why we don’t see interest from them before that time.
Our good friends disclosing, at possible peril to their lives, may not have the galactic perspective on the matter or else they’re not sharing it. But that too is available, besides sightings, and available on our own Internet.
So perhaps, without intending any disrespect, we can add that here.
According to the galactics, nuclear explosions in space cause incredible damage to planets and souls, even on other dimensions. And that was part of the reason why the galactics came in numbers – to prevent explosions of those kinds again. Matthew Ward explains:
“Creator’s one exception to honoring free will choices [is that] there will be no more nuclear detonations in space. Why only ‘in space’? Myriad souls live as free spirits or travel astrally, and some have been extensively damaged due to nuclear warring in other civilizations. There is an incomparable difference between damage to a soul and damage to a body. Your bodies are but the temporary housing you designed prior to birth, with genetic inheritances that would best enable you to experience what you chose to fill gaps in other lifetimes, with the goal of achieving overall balance. Those choices become your soul contract for this lifetime. How a body dies may be a provision of that contract, and whether the death is by heart failure or being blown to bits or radiation poisoning, the soul is unscathed. The soul is eternal!
“When a soul is in the area of a nuclear explosion in space, it is shattered and the parts are scattered, and for healing to occur, all parts must be retrieved and reintegrated so that all experiencing once again is intact. For the largest portion of a soul to locate all of its parts is extremely difficult, and when it does, the reintegration process is complex and lengthy. The scattered parts may have ramifications for other souls. Soul parts may enter bodies, where the resultant change may either enhance or impede the resident soul’s chosen pathway, or they may be captured by dark ones and cry out weakly for rescue.
“Way-showers and healers throughout the universe, including on Earth, are aiding the damaged souls. This is not yet within your ability to comprehend.” (1)
One might say, well, Matthew is not an extraterrestrial. What do the extraterrestrials say? Atmos of Sirius, speaking through Mike Quinsey, is an extraterrestrial and says the same as Matthew.

“Nuclear weapons are an abomination that is so destructive, even to the point of damaging the souls of those in their path. Fortunately, in the past where you have let off nuclear devices, we have placed a protective shield around your Earth to prevent damage to the outer planets, and life forces in Space. Do you still wonder why Man is considered such a danger to other forms of life?” (2)
Or the Arcturians:
“These energies affect those of other planets as well as yours, dear ones. You are not isolated as you have been led to believe. Nuclear devices sent into space by your military, affect more than just earth and will not be allowed. The personal agenda of an unawakened military mentality will not be allowed to function as it has in the past.” (3)
There’s more to the discussion. The galactics have prevented the destruction of Earth as well by causing nuclear bombs and missiles to fail to go off. But that discussion can be left for another occasion.
I said a few days ago that I didn’t agree with all that Foster Gamble was saying. For the same reason. Missing from Foster’s discussion are all the factors available only from considering what the actual galactics and other even more contentious members of the Company of Heaven say. Spending an hour with an angel? Uhh, we’re not ready for that yet.
And more’s the pity. Without following that discussion, a lot of matters that have been handled are presented as if they’re a clear and present danger. What has been done about the situation remains unsaid.
We have access to the galactic perspective but that perspective is, just like the UFOlogists’ in their turn, not accepted by the wider community, even including those in the UFO community. That day lies out in front of us. So discussions like Foster’s or like Linda Moulton Howe’s, and especially like Leslie Keen’s, stop short of introducing into the record what the galactics themselves are saying or have said.
But that does not detract from the fact that listening to the discourse as far as it has been taken is thrilling.
A lot of what is being said is well known to readers here. It isn’t for me so much the newness of what I’m learning as hearing it said in a concentrated fashion in a public setting. Steven Greer, Richard Dolan, the Brentwaters people, Capt. Salas, etc. We aren’t hearing anything ground-breakingly new.
But it’s being said to former representatives and senators, in a room resembling a hearing room, before the press, if they’re listening. And the news cannot but leak out: we are not alone. The great embargo of truth is ended.
So even though there’s impatience here that the fuller story be known, there’s also relief and a victory dance. We who listen to channeled messages don’t know the full story either. Probably we could not even understand the full story, as Matthew says. So much more of it awaits us. But the people in that hearing room are courageously opening the door for all of us to that further truth being known.

Footnotes

(1) Matthew’s Message, Aug. 5, 2005, at http://www.matthewbooks.com/mattsmessage.htm
(2) Atmos, Dec. 17, 2008, at http://www.treeofthegoldenlight.com/First_Contact/Channeled_Messages_by_Mike_Quinsey.htm
(3) The Arcturian Group, Oct. 7, 2012, at http://www.onenessofall.com/

NESARA- REPUBLIC NOW - GALACTIC NEWS

Tuesday, April 30, 2013