Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Obama ---- FOREIGN STUDENT ID card


I guess this is a forgery. Surely, it can't be true! Our main stream press would have found this out when they vetted him. HA!


Posted by John MacHaffie at 4:04:00 PM

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

who is this guy? how can he be so powerful for over 5 years now, and no one will touch him, or truly bring him to court for real. nixon got his day quickly, but not him.

April 30, 2013 at 5:05 PM
Anonymous said...

I totally agree. If/when there was any question at all it should have been investigated like a threat to our country. He is a puppet in a bigger scheme of things. His rose-colored smoke screen blinded many young voters, latinos, african americans and caucasians too! If free rides are offered then check the string attached cause it may choke you to death!!

April 30, 2013 at 7:20 PM
Anonymous said...

If this is real, then it should be enough along with the fake birth certificate to remove him from office. Go get him boys.

May 1, 2013 at 4:43 AM
Unknown said...

Nobody can reject the info you have given in the blogs, this is actually a great work.
ID Cards

August 1, 2013 at 1:18 AM
COMALite J said...

Meet Thomas Lugert of Germany. Click his name to go to his very own website. Do a “View Source” on it and you’ll see that it was generated using NetObjects Fusion 7 Trial for Windows, a version which came out in 2002 and was quickly supplanted by version 7.5 (the current version as I write this is NetObjects Fusion 2013). Feel free to do a WhoIs lookup on the domain (“lugert-online.de”) to verify that it is in fact owned by a German webhost (as if the “.de” on the end wasn’t enough to establish that fact), namely, Strato AG. Also verify that the registration was last updated way back in 2007, and the tech and zone contacts in 2006. Most people hadn’t even heard of Barack Obama yet then.

Note that his web design is barely out of the 1990s, with a static menu box to the left, and sky-blue Comics Sans MS text on a lavender background. Not the best site design, even back then in the 90s.

On Mr. Lugert’s page, click on the various links to the left. Hey, what’s that last item? “Columbia Universi…”? Due to bad interface design, the text is chopped off in that menu entry, at least in my browser. But, let’s click it anyway.

He says that he learned English there, and indeed went there for that purpose from “Juli [sic] 20” – August 14, 1998, since Columbia has a great course for learning English as a second language. He wasn’t there long — not even a full month.

Hey, what’s this? He shows his Columbia University Student ID card! It’s displayed small on that page, but if you right-click it and open it in a separate tab, you’ll see that the image was actually larger and was scaled down in the HTML (this was considered wasteful back then, but is actually pretty good today because it takes advantage of modern “retina”-class displays on most higher-end portable devices and some not-so-portable). Or you can simply click here to view it at full size.

Wow, it looks just like the “Barry Sœtoro” Obama “Foreign Student” ID shown above! Other than the name, photo, and year, and the word “FOREIGN STUDENT” instead of just “STUDENT” in the blue bar at the bottom, they’re identical. Well, also except for the bar code and Student ID# (which the bar code encodes), of course, since no two students could have the same ID numb— oh, wait, those are identical, too!!! “Card #600962011054355”!

How can this be!? How can they have the same ID# and the same barcode!?

Waitaminnit — Herr Lugert is from Germany and only traveled to the USA for a short time to attend Columbia, so he would’ve absolutely been a Foreign Student — so why doesn’t his ID say that, especially since Obama’s does!?

Hmmmm— something seems fishy here. Let’s notice some more things.

The cards are absolutely identical right down to the resolution (484×308 pixels for the card itself, though some images on the Internet add border or other elements that increase the size), JPEG compression level, angle (rotated about 1° clockwise in the scanner), etc. Both are curved up slightly (as plastic ID cards so often are) so that a slightly arc-shaped shadow is cast along the top. That shadow is pixel-for-pixel identical, as is everything else on the card except the name, photo, year, two-letter-and-year code box (“SU|98” for Herr Lugert and “AA|81” for Obama), and the large text in the blue bar at the bottom (“STUDENT” for Herr Lugert, “FOREIGN STUDENT” [looking artificially condensed horizontally] for Obama).

— (cont.) —

January 1, 2014 at 2:32 PM
COMALite J said...

— (cont.) —

On Herr Lugert’s ID, not only is the card itself rotated ~1° clockwise, but so is everything on it relative to the image bounding box, making them line up perfectly with the card itself, as would be expected from a real ID card. Not so with Obama’s. All of the elements that I just mentioned as being different between the two are also perfectly aligned with the bounding box of the image, not with the card itself — causing them to be effectively rotated ~1° counter-clockwise relative to the card itself! This includes: “Barry Sœtoro,” the photo (B&W instead of color, and strangely identical to an old known photograph of Obama — wouldn’t the school take their own photo when making an ID?), the two-letter-and-year code box, and the text “FOREIGN STUDENT” within the blue bar, but not the blue bar itself!

That text isn’t even lined up with the blue bar that contains it! Note that the bottom of the “F” in “FOREIGN” is noticeably closer to the bottom of the blue box that contains those two words than the bottom of the second/last “T” in “STUDENT” is, and conversely, that the top of that “T” is noticeably closer to the top of the blue box than the top of the “F” in “FOREIGN” is — and note that this is not the case with Herr Lugert’s ID. There’s more, too, including the nature of the pixels of the blue bar itself and how they differs between the two — exactly as needed in the “Sœtoro” version to explain a blue rectangle being placed over previously existing “STUDENT” text in the full-width version of the font, to cover that up and allow an artificially condensed “FOREIGN STUDENT” to be overlaid on it without any of the previous “STUDENT” being visible.

Okay, so one card would definitely have to’ve been photoshopped using the other as a template. But which is the original, and which the photoshopped fake? Well, in addition to the physical image evidences such as the angles and the pixels in the blue bar and such, why would Herr Lugert put his card on such an amateurish website that makes no mention of Obama? When did he do so? Fortunately we have the Internet Wayback Machine, and can go back in time to see what his website used to look like.

Turns out that the earliest capture of that page that the Internet Wayback Machine has was captured on December 11, 2002 (at 14:41:57 GMT, to be precise). Obama wasn’t President then. He wasn’t running for President then. He wasn’t even a U.S. Senator then! He was only an Illinois State Senator then, and most people in America outside of Illinois had never even heard of him! And yet, there’s Herr Lugert’s Columbua University Student ID card, with the same identical number and barcode and pixel-for-pixel identical shadow and card edges and school name and logo and ID# and barcode and blue bar but not the text within it, all lined up with the card itself, right on that page in late 2002, stored on the Internet Wayback Machine’s servers!

Sure looks like Herr Lugert’s is the original, and the “Barry Sœtoro” one was photoshopped from that. But is it still possible for it to be the other way around? Not without a time machine, but then again, maybe Obama does actually have one of those. How else did those birth announcements get in the Honolulu newspapers in December of 1961?

—(cont.)—

January 2, 2014 at 3:17 AM
COMALite J said...

— (cont. [part 3])—

Is it still possible that a student going by “Barry Sœtoro” attended Columbia in 1981 and had that “Foreign Student” ID card? Well, we already see that Lugert actually was a foreign student (German citizen), yet his card simply says “STUDENT.” Did Columbia even issue cards that said “FOREIGN STUDENT”? What purpose would that serve?

But more to the point, Lugert attended in 1998, and Obama in 1981. Lugert’s ID is obviously genuine, and matches other IDs from that time period. Was Columbia using that same ID card format way back in 1981? No!! Bar code technology did exist back then, but the equipment to produce and process them was too expensive for small (or even most large) colleges and universities at that time.

Though we need not speculate: Columbia University itself announced the switchover to the new format — in 1996, a mere two years before Lugert attended, but 1½ decades after Obama attended! That announcement is dated February 2, 1996, and the actual switchover began on March 1. Note that announcement page includes a clickable link at the top that shows another one of those ID cards as a sample, this one for an “OFFICER” named “Joseph Ineuso.” Note that his photo is in color, just like Lugert’s but not like “Sœtoro’s.” (Speaking of which, here’s Columbia U’s web page on the format of the photo needed for their ID card: note that it must be in color!)

So, not only does Lugert’s card date back to well before Obama’s national political career even began (even his failed US House of Representatives run in 2000) and his website and thus the web image of the ID card dates back to at least two years before his U.S. Senate career, but Columbia didn’t even have bar-coded IDs like that during any of the 1980s (nor even first ½ of the 1900s!), let alone 1981!

So, sorry, but the “Barry Sœtoro” card is definitely, provably fake. It was made from Thomas Lugert’s 1998 ID card, which was snagged from his own amateurish website. This didn’t happen by accident. Somebody did this on purpose, with the express intention of deceiving millions of American citizens and undermining the authority of the President of the United States.

Who did it? Probably whoever sent that original tweet, but if not him, then whoever he got it from. I’d love to have access to the computer he had in 2011 when that tweet went out, and run data recovery software on it and see if there are any .PSD or other layered photo-retouching software files that have Lugert’s ID as the base layer and hand-typed text layers and blue bar “STUDENT” coverup rectangle and such as layers.

— (cont. [in Part 4]) —

January 2, 2014 at 11:09 AM
COMALite J said...

— (concl.) —

• Obama’s scholarship was not a Fulbright scholarship, a type of which is indeed intended for foreign students. Those are intended for post-graduate studies (master’s and doctorate degrees), not freshmen and sophomores like Obama.

• Obama did not attend any college under the name “Barry Sœtoro.” According to Occidental College Director of Communications Jim Tranquada, the 1979–80 freshman “Lookbook” lists him as “Barack Obama” as does all other similar public documents from the school at that time. All of the alumni that Mr. Tranquada had spoken to “…from that era (1979–81) who knew him, knew him as ‘Barry Obama’.”

• The Daily Mail never published any story entitled “Obama Eligibility Questioned.” No such article can be found either on their own website archives or on Nexis.

• The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear Leo Donofrio’s case on December 8, 2008.

• As stated above under the truths, the “United States Justice Foundation” really exists and has one “Gary Kreep” as its executive director. But, there is no mention of Obama spending any amount of money for any reason on their site, and nothing about turning over any info to Eric Holder. FactCheck.org Emailed Kreep and asked him about that, and on May 28, 2009, he replied point-blank: “It’s all a hoax.”

January 2, 2014 at 7:53 PM
Anonymous said...

I personally feel that he may be a sleeper. he was put here and put into office to bring the united states down. look he has brought us to our knees.phony birth certificate should have been a warning.now its too late. damage is done. where are those that took on Nixon ? I guess men don't know how to step up and be men any more.

September 8, 2014 at 2:30 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)