Posted in: Celebrity News Posted: March 17, 2015

Clint Eastwood Talks Near Death Experience When Plane Crashed in 1950s

ADVERTISEMENT

Clint Eastwood revealed he had a near death experience in the 1950s while he was doing his military service, and the plane he was in crashed.

During an interview for the Loyola Marymount University School of Film & TV, where he participated in the famous Hollywood Masters interview series on March 11, Eastwood talked about the unknown incident. Speaking to students, the American Sniper director discussed what he was thinking during the terrifying moments all those years ago when he hitched a ride on a military plane.

“What was going through my mind was just a stark fear, a stark terror, because (in the) first place, I didn’t know anything about aviation at that particular time — I was just hopping a ride.”
“In those days, you could wear your uniform and get a free flight. On the way back, they had one plane, a Douglas AD, sort of a torpedo bomber of the World War II vintage, and I thought I’d hitch on that. Everything went wrong. Radios went out. Oxygen ran out. And finally we ran out of fuel up around Point Reyes, California, and went in the ocean. So we went swimming. It was late October, November. Very cold water. (I) found out many years later that it was a white shark breeding ground, but I’m glad I didn’t know that at the time or I’d have just died.”

In 1950, Clint Eastwood was about 20-years-old and not the movie star that we know now. His career didn’t begin until 1954, when he signed a $100 contract ($878 today) with Universal. The Hollywood Masters series is moderated by Stephen Galloway, who is also editor of The Hollywood Reporter, which published the news exclusively.
When asked by Galloway if he was afraid to die, Clint Eastwood responded in his typical straightforward way.

“No, I just…Yeah, I just thought in the back of my mind I was well some people have made through these things so maybe we’ll have a luck and when we hit the water and the water felt much more comfortable because in the air the sound of the engine not running was very disconcerting.”

Acting wouldn’t come until later for Clint Eastwood, which he did reluctantly after someone suggested to him taking evening lessons. His family was of modest origins and he couldn’t have envisioned what his future had in store for him. His parents had mixed reactions when he finally got the job.
“My mother thought it was great, my father said get a real job. He says you know stay in school, get a real job and I should have,” Clint Eastwood said. Luckily for movie lovers, Clint didn’t go back to school, and he became one of the most famous Hollywood success stories.

Posted in: Politics Posted: March 15, 2015

Ted Cruz Wants To Lift All Limits On Campaign Contributions

Texas Senator Ted Cruz, who has yet to officially announce his run for president in 2016, says that all limits should be lifted on campaign contributions.

On his first trip this year to New Hampshire, Cruz spoke to potential voters in a town hall type meeting, insisting that he was not yet a presidential candidate, but was “looking at it very seriously.” Cruz’s New Hampshire trip follows on the heels of a visits to Iowa and South Carolina in the past week – which, like New Hampshire, are also early voting states.
According to the Washington Post, Cruz told the New Hampshire voters that getting rid of campaign contribution limits would give the people a greater say in the political progress, and equated the ability to give unlimited donations to the candidate of their choice to the First Amendment right to free speech.
“I believe in free speech and the First Amendment, which means everyone here has the right to speak out in politics as effectively as possible,” Cruz said when asked about the role of the wealthy in politics. “To speak out and make your views known, whether that is standing on a street corner on a soap box, whether that is printing out a yard sign, whether that is spending money to run a radio ad or a TV ad, effectively communicating.”
“The answer it not to muzzle citizens. It is to empower citizens,” he said.
Gary DiPiero, a Massachusetts supporter who attended the meeting, attempted to give Cruz a blank check afterward, telling him to fill in any amount he needed.
The Associate Press reported that Cruz declined, but told an aide to stay in touch with DiPiero and contact him after he officially enters the primary.
“Stay tuned,” Cruz said.
Cruz also noted that heavy spending had caused him a headache during his run for the Texas senate, recalling having millions of dollars spent on “nasty attack ads” by his opponents, but adding that they had a “constitutional right” to run those ads.
“Right now, the system is crazy,” he said, addressing the campaign finance rules.
Cruz, who strongly supports tea party policies, according to the Inquisitr, is expected to formally announce his candidacy in a few weeks, joining Florida Governor Jeb Bush, Florida Senator Marco Rubio, and Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker in the race for the Republican nomination.
Cruz, who currently lives in a high-rise apartment in Houston, told voters that his daughter has given him permission to run for president because the family dog would have free reign on the White House lawn.
“If you win, that means Snowflake will finally get a backyard to pee in,” his daughter told him.
COMMENT.... TED CRUZ IS AN ATTORNEY AND IS MARRIED TO A WOMEN THAT WORKS FOR GOLDMAN SACHS AS A VICE PRESIDENT, AND WAS AN ECONOMIC ADVISOR FOR THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION..... "THE NEW WORLD ORDER"....DO YOU REALLY WANT SOMEONE LIKE HIM AS PREZZZZ?   GO LOOK IT UP DO YOUR OWN HOME WORK...

Posted in: News Posted: March 17, 2015

Kappa Delta Rho Penn State Fraternity: Photos Surface Of Unconscious Nude Women, Drugs, Hazing

The Kappa Delta Rho fraternity at Penn State has been suspended after a private Facebook group for the organization was discovered. In the group, photos of partially naked women in an unconscious state were found along with images of drug deals.

WJAC reports that a secret Facebook page was created by Kappa Delta Rho members to post offensive photos in private. The Facebook group consisted of over 150 men which included current and alum members. A victim of the photos found the secret group and was able to download 20 of the photos. However, after fraternity members found out that the group had been breached, they immediately closed the original group and created a “2.0” version in its wake.

“According to the search warrant, the first page “Covert Business Transactions” was shut down after a victim allegedly discovered it, but according to the search warrant, a second page titled ‘2.0’ was made in its place.”

The Facebook group contained photos of women in varying states of undress while passed out or sleeping. The photos also showed drug activity and hazing. Police say that the women did not know that they were being photographed.

“Police said this is where members allegedly shared photos of drug sales, hazing and photos of unsuspecting victims – mostly women – partially naked.”

In addition to taking down the original Facebook page, the fraternity members at Kappa Delta Rho also deleted evidence from house computers. When police arrived with a search warrant, the computers were completely wiped clean. However, police say they have printed and digital copies of at least 20 photos that were obtained from the original “Covert Business Transactions” page before it was taken down. Police were also able to obtain a warrant to view the photos located in the “2.0” group.
WPXI notes that the fraternity was suspended after Penn State’s Office of Student Council, school officials and the North-American Interfraternity Conference got involved in the investigation. Penn State’s Office of Student Council and the IFC are attempting to help police identify possible victims and sanction the fraternity.
The IFC made an official statement regarding the suspension of the Penn State Kappa Delta Rho fraternity noting that after the investigation is complete, the chapter will be summoned for a full review session.

“In response to the discovery of the two Facebook pages allegedly hosted by Kappa Delta Rho, the chapter was immediately placed on full chapter suspension by Penn State’s Interfraternity Council. Upon completion of all investigation into this matter, Kappa Delta Rho will be summoned by the IFC to undergo a conduct review session.”

The Penn State fraternity incident comes on the heels of another national fraternity in hot water. The Sigma Alpha Epsilon chapter at the University of Oklahoma was shut down after the group was videoed singing a racist chant.

Posted in: News Posted: March 17, 2015

3 Judges Fired After Viewing Adult Videos On Work Computers —But Did They Do Anything Illegal?

A total of three judges have been fired — and a fourth resigned before the axe could fall — after they were found to be viewing adult video on their work computers, in their judicial offices. The firings took place in the United Kingdom and were made public this week — but the judges were not accused of doing anything illegal.

Britain’s Judicial Conduct Investigations Office, however, condemned the adult video viewing habits of the three judges, calling their behavior, “wholly unacceptable conduct for a judicial office holder,” and an “inexcusable misuse” of the internet service provided to them for official business.
The investigators concluded that none of the judges used their online work accounts to view “images of children or any other illegal content,” the Judicial Conduct Office said in a statement.
District Judge Timothy Bowles, Immigration Judge Warren Grant and Deputy District Judge and Recorder Peter Bullock and the fourth man, Recorder Andrew Maw were also not found to have any connections to one another — outside of the fact that they were all judges.
Maw turned in his gavel before any disciplinary action could be taken against him. The other three were handed pink slips.
According to legal experts, to remove a judge from the bench is extremely rare in the U.K.. In fact, BBC legal analyst Clive Coleman called it “unprecedented,” raising the question of whether the judges conduct truly merited such an extreme disciplinary action.

“For three judges, albeit pretty junior ones, to be sacked at the same time represents a serious blow to the reputation of the judiciary, Coleman said. “However, there is no suggestion that any of the sacked judges did anything illegal in accessing pornography via their judicial computers. Had they done the same thing at home there would have been little basis for dismissing them.”

Their alleged wrongdoing, he added, was nothing more than using their work internet privileges for a purpose that their bosses deemed inappropriate.
Only one of the fired judges has commented publicly on the firing. Grant, who now works as an immigration lawyer in private practice, blamed his lapse in conduct on psychological issues.
“For some years before, and during, the period covered by the conduct which formed the subject of the complaint laid against me I was suffering from severe and undiagnosed depression,” Grant said — going on to request “that the privacy of my family and myself be respected so that we are allowed to continue with our lives.”
Of the three fired judges, it appears that only one, Andrew Maw, was senior enough to retire, which he did, complete with pension. Note that the judges in the above stock image are not the same three judges who were fired.

Why the Left Loathes Senator Cotton’s Letter to Iran

Four Reasons Why the Left Loathes Senator Cotton’s Letter to Iran

Mar. 16, 2015 8:00am

Benjamin Weingarten   


That a short letter penned by an Iraq War veteran and signed by 46 of his colleagues in the Senate would earn the ridicule, scorn and derision of the left, while generating wobbliness among the more politically craven members of the right, is a testament to its virtue.
The primarily pedagogic letter’s detractors have invoked the Logan Act, signing a petition calling for the prosecution of the letter’s signatories on grounds of treason. But little could be further from treasonous than publicly opposing a policy that legitimizes and empowers a mortal enemy of America and her interests.

This Aug. 21, 2014, file photo shows Rep. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., as he speaks during a news conference in North Little Rock, Ark. (AP Photo/Danny Johnston, File)

Worse still, legislators who in actuality undermined American interests by negotiating with our enemies are mentioned in the same light. This list of shame includes: John Kerry, Ted Kennedy and Nancy Pelosi among others.
The truth of the matter is that Sen. Cotton’s letter sticks in the craw of the left, causing it’s partisans to resort to ad hominem and absurd attacks. They do so primarily for four reasons:

1. Sen. Cotton’s letter forces the left to defend the indefensible

Whether addressing the congressional speech of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or the letter authored by Sen. Tom Cotton, the left rarely attacks on substance because it realizes the content of its opponents’ message is credible, and the character of the messengers is widely seen as unimpeachable.
The same cannot be said however of the deal that President Barack Obama seeks to consummate, and the parties sitting at the negotiating table.
Across the political spectrum Iran is seen as the world’s leading state sponsor of terror.
Iran and her proxies have drawn the blood of America and her allies for decades.
Iran has been forthright in stating its desire to destroy Israel.
Iran has demonstrated — and continues to demonstrate – its willingness to lie, deceive and cheat with respect to the size and nature of its nuclear program.
It is further unquestioned that a nuclear-armed Iran will have grave consequences including acceleration and expansion of the Middle East’s arms race.
It is also crystal clear that the Obama administration does not have the will or desire to destroy Iran’s nuclear program, and is rumored to have stymied Israel’s own plans to conduct such an operation.
Finally, the Obama administration has opposed at every turn efforts to implement tougher sanctions that would aim to economically cripple, and politically undermine its mullahs.
To date, the president has instead chosen to ease sanctions on Iran, facilitating the flow of billions of dollars back into its ailing economy, and tacitly supported its elite forces in their fight against the Islamic State. Further, the president has sought to portray Iran as a pillar of Middle East stability and perhaps America’s top ally in the region over Israel. He has done so while concurrently negotiating a deal that by published accounts will allow Iran to enrich uranium and ultimately develop a nuclear bomb — even if Iran is fully compliant with the terms of the accord. These actions have served to legitimize and empower Tehran, while at the same time increasing the threat to the United States and her allies.
One could make the case that regardless of the outcome of negotiations, Iran has already won. Its leaders have already declared victory through triumphant word and deed.
For these reasons, any actions that challenge the president’s negotiations shine a spotlight on a disastrous policy, forcing the left into the uncomfortable spot of defending the self-evidently indefensible.

2. Sen. Cotton’s letter represents a direct challenge to President Obama

There is little that unites the left more than attacks on the policies of President Obama, which it reflexively spins as attacks on the president himself.
This is most clearly evidenced by pundits such as Chris Matthews, who implied Sen. Cotton and his colleagues are racists for signing a letter that is singularly factual and aimed at questions of policy.
In the eyes of the left, the least-vetted, least-challenged president in the modern era must never be touched.
Should anyone have the temerity to do so, the left closes ranks and pillories the offender.
Even the few members of the left who brazenly challenge the Iran policy of President Obama face the administration’s wrath.

3. Sen. Cotton had the gall to actually invoke the Constitution in defense of his action

Back in October 2009, then-Speaker Pelosi was famously asked what part of the Constitution authorized Obamacare’s individual mandate. Her response? “Are you serious?”
Give the Congresswoman credit for her candor.
In that moment she perfectly crystallized the modern left’s view of the Constitution – it is an afterthought, a powerless piece of parchment should it stand as an impediment to Democrat designs.
Does anyone honestly believe that the left is upset at Sen. Cotton’s actions because he did not follow some sort of protocol to which the left has never subjected itself, and which the Constitution does not require? Does the left honestly believe either in letter or spirit that Cotton and his colleagues actually violated the Logan Act?
Rarely have the Democrats during the Obama reign argued for the sanctity of protocol, let alone the rule of law – except when it comes to others voicing opinions they find inconsistent with their narrative and/or harmful to their agenda (e.g., Netanyahu’s speech before Congress).
Senator Cotton is not violating either the Constitution or the Logan Act by writing a letter that informs Iran as to the Senate’s prerogative on foreign policy, and illustrates the weakness of an unratified agreement in the first place. If anything, he is pointing out to the Iranian leadership how the US Government was set-up to work – checks and balances of which some in the Obama administration and on the left seem sorely unaware.

4. Sen. Cotton’s letter contains painful truths

If the negotiations that President Obama was unilaterally conducting with a genocidal jihadist regime were in the best interest of the United States, a letter such as Sen. Cotton’s would be dismissed out of hand and simply ignored.
At most, Democrats would welcome it as discrediting of Republicans.
Yet the left has not attacked the letter on either of these bases.
To the contrary, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki and Secretary of State John Kerry have both been forced to acknowledge that Sen. Cotton and his colleagues are correct in noting that any nuclear deal is nonbinding on the next president, should it not be placed before the US Senate and have at least 67 senators agree to ratify it.
This is a hard pill to swallow for the left in general and President Obama in particular, given that from the beginning of his presidency, he has made unconditional negotiations with Iran a central part of his foreign policy.
An Iran deal may indeed serve as President Obama’s only foreign policy legacy in light of the Arab Spring turning to winter, and the increasingly bellicose and unrestrained postures of Russia and China looming large.
Given what we know about Iran, one can only hope that history does not afford Mr. Obama this “legacy.”

THEY'RE BACK!!! ATF & White House: "We didn't cave on GUN AMMO BAN"!

The ATF’s Ammo Ban Is Back…in the Form of a New Bill From Democrats of course!  Who else would you expect?

Mar. 16, 2015 10:37am Pete Kasperowicz

Four House Democrats have taken the Obama administration’s idea of a regulation to ban a widely used kind of ammunition — one it had to pull back because it was so unpopular — and turned it into legislation.

Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) introduced the Armor Piercing Bullets Act, which he said would ban the sale of “.223-dervied, 5.56x45mm NATO ‘green tip’ rounds” that are commonly used on the AR-15 rifle. That’s the same ban that the ATF proposed in February, through the adoption of a “framework” that would justify a ban on all bullets that can pierce police body armor.    

 

The ATF’s framework prompted the submission of almost 90,000 comments, most of which opposed the plan as one that would ban a popular round used in a popular rifle. For years, these green tip rounds have enjoyed an exception from a ban on armor-piercing bullets, because they are generally used for sporting purposes.

But even when announcing that this framework would be indefinitely delayed, the ATF indicated it would continue to work on the issue and see if there’s a way to implement its framework. At a hearing last week, ATF Director B. Todd Jones said his agency was “figuring out how we do this rationally.”

Engel was more direct, and said the ATF had it right, and that it’s framework should now be implemented via legislation.

“As the ATF rightly pointed out, these rounds can easily be loaded into concealed pistols and other short guns, making them particularly dangerous to police officers,” Engel noted. “The well-being of the men and women who protect us should not, and need not, be a partisan issue. I encourage all of my colleagues in Congress to support this obvious measure that will, if enacted, save lives.”

Engel blamed the gun industry for promoting the use of armor-piercing bullets.

“There is absolutely no compelling argument to be made for anyone else to have access to them,” he said. “But the out of touch gun industry lobby is fighting tooth and nail to keep cop-killing ammunition on the streets.”

Republican senators opposed to the ATF’s proposal said last week that the real issue is how banning a popular cartridge makes it harder for people to exercise their Second Amendment rights.

“If law-abiding gun owners cannot obtain rifle ammunition, or face substantial difficulty in finding ammunition available and at reasonable prices because government entities are banning such ammunition, then the Second Amendment is at risk,” dozens of senators wrote in a letter to the ATF.

Other Democrats supporting Engel’s bill are Reps. Yvette Clarke (N.Y.), Carolyn Maloney (N.Y.), and Bonnie Watson Coleman (N.J.).

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/03/16/the-atfs-ammo-ban-is-backin-the-form-of-a-new-bill-from-democrats/#

Obama's Warning Letter to Senate: Don’t Go Messing With My Iran Deal!

Suzanne Hamner 9 hours ago

Obama's Warning Letter to Senate:

Don’t Go Messing With My Iran Deal!

Obama wasted no time in having his chief of staff, Denis McDonough, fire off a letter to Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Sen. Bob Corker, (R-TN) warning "US Senators to withhold legislation" that "would likely have a profoundly negative impact on the ongoing negotiations" with Iran. The letter is issuing a veto threat of Corker's Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015 which requires Congress to approve any nuclear deal reached with Iran. Additionally, this letter from the administration could be seen as a response to one signed by 47 Republican Senators that was sent to Iran's Ayatollah.

McDonough claimed in his letter that "Since October 2013, senior Administration officials from the White House, the Departments of State, Energy, Defense and the Intelligence Community have conducted more than 200 meetings, classified briefings, and calls with Senate and House members and their staffs on Iran, over half of which have been conducted since January 2015." McDonough claims that the President, Vice President, cabinet officials, sanctions and nuclear experts were among the officials participating in the meetings.

Being that January has 31 calendar days, February 28 and so far 15 days have been completed in March, and using just half of 200, that would mean that these individuals met once per day and sometimes twice per day. Taking away weekends, Obama's golf and "rock star" personal appearance time, his time spent using the "selfie stick," and TV show appearances, it would up the number of meetings per day. While what McDonough indicated in the letter could be true, one would have serious doubts about the participation of Obama based on Obama's treatment of the office of the presidency. A letter signed by 47 Republican Senators sent to the Iranian leader would indicate that Republicans might be left out of the loop meaning the meetings have been conducted, if at all, with Democratic members of Congress.

McDonough indicated that Congress does have a role to play, along with voting, on any international agreement reached with Iran. However, he also stated in the letter that the Congressional approval of waivers given to the President to suspend some statutory sanctions should remain in place so they can "re-impose" sanctions should Iran falter on the commitment.

McDonough went on to write:

However, the legislation that you have introduced in the Senate goes well beyond ensuring that Congress has a role to play in any deal with Iran. Instead, the legislation would potentially prevent any deal from succeeding by suggesting Congress must vote to "approve" any deal, and by removing existing sanction waiver authorities that have already been granted to the President. We believe that the legislation would likely have a profoundly negative impact on the ongoing negotiations – emboldening Iranian hard-liners, inviting a counter-productive response from the Iranian majiles; differentiating the US position from our allies in the negotiations; and once again calling into question our ability to negotiate this deal.

And just who are the allies in the negotiations?

Obama has thrown most of our European allies under the bus to pander for Islamic governments and regimes. The countries participating in these negotiations may be allies on paper, but have been replaced in practice by our Muslim-in-chief. In the past, US presidents have been true leaders setting the course for others; however, Obama has continually "led from behind."

Are we to believe that any European nation or member of NATO would trust Obama to "help" negotiate any international deal with an Islamic government, such as Iran, when this man has supported the Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt, aided and abetted terrorist groups

and lied, not only to the American people, but on the world stage?

As the old saying goes, "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me."

McDonough cited several past incidences where Congressional approval was not needed in certain arrangements between a multitude of nations.

However, under McDonough's own admission, these incidences were either "non-legally" binding frameworks, guidelines, initiatives, codes of conduct, declarations, cooperatives or communique and work plans. These terms are much different than treaties or deals involving the international community.

The request from the White House via McDonough is simple enough –

let the negotiations be completed before Congress acts on legislation. According to the letter, the administration is "committed" to disclosing the details of the deal and the technical documents "related to a long-term comprehensive deal with Congress." The simple goal, according to the letter, is "using diplomacy to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon."

Once a comprehensive deal has been reached, if there are any serious flaws the Senate discovers, how will Iran react if the "deal" they were promised is not solidified? Isn't it better to discover those things before finalization of a "comprehensive" deal? It's long been known that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. But, knowing Obama,

he would ignore any opposition from the Senate.

Is there any country who developed nuclear capability for "peaceful" purposes who didn't go on and develop nuclear weapons? Even though Japan signed a nuclear non-proliferation treaty some 40 years ago, Japan has the capability of producing nuclear weapons with rumors existing of a "bomb in the basement."

Furthermore, the letter indicates that the United Nations Security Council would also have some role to play in the deal with Iran.

Because the principal negotiators of an arrangement with Iran are the five permanent members of the Security Council, we anticipate the Security Council would pass a resolution to register its support for any deal and increase its international legitimacy. A resolution would also increase the international pressure on Iran to live up to the deal and would expand the risks if they failed to do so.

The five permanent members are China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States. The other members are rotating, serving two year terms, and elected from the General Assembly; however, the 10 non-permanent members do not have veto capability. Any time the UN is involved should cause some alarm. Looking at the five permanent members of the Security Council does not produce any confidence whatsoever.

None of these five permanent members will even identify the problem

with the Iranian government as its deeply cemented Islamic roots.

This government adheres to the strictness of Sharia law, engages in

all practices of deception to include taqiyya, and has partnered with Russia on several trade agreements including a joint oil exchange in

July 2010.

It boils down simply to one statement. Giving Obama's propensity of supporting Islam, aligning with Islamic governments, filling his administration with members of the terrorist organization the Muslim Brotherhood, and aiding and abetting America's enemies, such as Al-Qaeda and ISIS, this man has no business whatsoever brokering anything with Iran. Congress, particularly the Republicans in the Senate, are right to be concerned as Democrats will not go against their "savior."

However, had Congress had the backbone to deal with the treasonous Criminal-in-Chief according to the US Constitution, and any successor accordingly as well, while expelling its own criminal elements, the members might could rest a bit easier knowing there was not a "loose wire" in the White House.

http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/03/obamas-warning-letter-to-senate-dont-go-messing-with-my-iran-deal/#fzpBcxCBSQ1YIMeY.99

11-year-old Suspended For Law Enforcement Ignorance!

We The People, Sheriffs, and Larry Klayman,

Even when the testing came back NEGATIVE on the marijuana the ZERO TOLERANCE is still in effect: "For one, field tests of the leaf, identified as marijuana by school officials and the county sheriff’s office, came back negative three times."

Even when: "Having no evidence to stand on, the county prosecutor dropped the case against R.M.B.; however, he would still have to follow the school’s orders to attend the alternative school, apart from his peers friends and extra-cirricular activities." so the school stands that you are GUILTY on an assumption!

All the Schools have to do is make an ACCUSATION and the student is done with!!!

11-year-old Suspended For A Year After School Mistakes Ordinary Leaf for Marijuana
http://www.infowars.com/6th-grader-suspended-for-a-year-after-school-mistakes-ordinary-leaf-for-marijuana/
Sixth grader falls victim to state's stringent zero tolerance laws
 by Adan Salazar | Infowars.com | March 16, 2015

A Virginia couple is suing their son’s middle school after he was wrongly accused of possessing marijuana, a false allegation that set off a chain of events that ultimately degraded the student’s mental well-being.

Parents Linda and Bruce Bays have a federal lawsuit pending against the Bedford County Schools and the Bedford County Sheriff’s Office for wrongfully pinning a marijuana charge on their son, a participant of the school’s gifted-and-talented program.

They aren’t sure how a lighter and a leaf ended up in their 11-year-old’s backpack, but they’re positive the extent of his punishment doesn’t fit the alleged crime.

For one, field tests of the leaf, identified as marijuana by school officials and the county sheriff’s office, came back negative three times.

“Essentially they kicked him out of school for something they couldn’t prove he did,” the family’s lawyer Melvin Williams says, commenting on the boy’s 364-day suspension.

Back on September 22, the Bays’ son, identified as R.M.B. in court documents, was summoned to the principal’s office where he was interrogated and asked to empty the contents of his backpack.

Assistant Principal Brian Wilson began by asking “if he had anything he shouldn’t have. He said, ‘No,’” according to a report from The Roanoke Times.

The principal then opened a zipper on the front of the boy’s bag that revealed a lighter and a leaf.

R.M.B.’s parents were told their son was showing off the items to other students in class and inside a bathroom claiming the leaf to be marijuana, which the student denies.

School officials, however, didn’t hesitate to exercise the full authority of Virginia’s zero-tolerance laws, moving to suspend the student for a year.

The Bays’ lawsuit also names the school’s resource officer, Deputy M.M. Calhoun, who issued a false testimony before a judge.

“The field test came back not inconclusive, but negative,” says Williams, adding, “Yet she went to a magistrate and swore he possessed marijuana at school.”

Despite the absence of evidence, R.M.B. was ordered to attend an alternative school full of problem children and ne’er-do-wells.

Additionally, R.M.B. would be forced to endure bag searches upon entering and leaving the school each day, which didn’t sit well with his parents, who got the school to agree to allow him to take homeschool classes following a strictly timed regimen.

The Bays say the events left their son worse for wear, and he began to fall into an emotional slump.

“[He] just broke down and said his life was over. He would never be able to get into college; he would never be able to get a job,” his mother described.

After the school suspected R.M.B. of having substance abuse problems, he was ordered to see a psychiatrist for an evaluation, who found him to be suffering from panic attacks and depression.

Having no evidence to stand on, the county prosecutor dropped the case against R.M.B.; however, he would still have to follow the school’s orders to attend the alternative school, apart from his peers friends and extra-cirricular activities.

The school cites the state’s rigorous zero-tolerance laws as justification for the suspension, which makes no distinction between actual drugs and “lookalike,” or “imitation” drugs.

But the Bays’ lawyer says the school doesn’t have a legal leg to stand on.

“If the school argues now that they were justified in suspending him for possession of lookalike marijuana, that’s disingenuous because they’ve never argued that prior to the suit being filed,” he says.

Given the school’s rush to punish the boy, despite an utter lack of evidence, the Bays’ case is emblematic of the inherent problems with irrational zero tolerance policies and the overarching move to transform public schools into something more similar to prisons.

R.M.B. is still under probation until this September, but his parents vow to keep up the fight until their son is exonerated of any wrongdoing.

Dan

UFOs are Everywhere

UFOS are everywhere. Everyone is Just Looking for them in the Wrong Place.

According to website www.revelatorium.com/starrgram39.html, Ufo fans looking at moving physical objects and flashing lights as eager proof of extra Terrestrial life are looking in the wrong place. UFOs are all over the place, all the time. You just need to know where to look.

As the website explains, the right place to look is in the common ionnic cloud structures covering many parts of Earth. Starrgram 39 of The Revelatorium reveals that true UFOS are fifth dimensional Radionnic ships of light sitting in Earth’s fifth dimension. A vast fleet of the Radionnic ships sits in the Kuiper Belt outside the orbit of Pluto. At any given time thousands of the ships will be teleported into Earth’s lower ionic atmosphere at the fifth dimensional level.

The presence of their magnetic fields in the fifth dimension sets up third dimensional magnetic scalar reflections within Earth’s lower ionic cloud covers. The individual reflections are visible as a pattern of radial lines emanating from a center point like the spokes of a wheel. The overall effect is that of a magnetic monopole sitting overhead. The magnetic monopole effect is their giveaway as magnetic monopoles are not possible in nature.

The website starrgram contains many such easily recognized examples plus a complete expaination.

http://www.revelatorium.com/starrgram39.html

Putin On Russian TV: "Ukrainian armed coup was organized from Washington"

The Ukrainian armed coup was organized from Washington, Russian President Vladimir Putin stated in an interview for a new documentary aired Sunday. The Americans tried to hide behind the Europeans, but Moscow saw through the trick, he added.

“The trick of the situation was that outwardly the [Ukrainian] opposition was supported mostly by the Europeans. But we knew for sure that the real masterminds were our American friends,”Putin said in a documentary, ‘Crimea – The Way Home,’ aired by Rossiya 1 news channel.

“They helped training the nationalists, their armed groups, in Western Ukraine, in Poland and to some extent in Lithuania,” he added.

“They facilitated the armed coup.”

The West spared no effort to prevent Crimea’s reunification with Russia, “by any means, in any format and under any scheme,” he noted.

Putin said this approach was far from being the best dealing with any country, and a post-Soviet country like Ukraine specifically.

Such countries have a short record of living under a new political system and remain fragile.

Violating constitutional order in such a country inevitably deal a lot of damage to its statehood, the president said.

“The law was thrown away and crashed. And the consequences were grave indeed. Part of the country agreed to it, while another part wouldn’t accept it. The country was shattered,” Putin explained.

He also accused the beneficiaries of the coup of planning an assassination of then-President Viktor Yanukovich.

Russia was prepared to act to ensure his escape, Putin said.

“I invited the heads of our special services, the Defense Ministry and ordered them to protect the life of the Ukrainian president.

Otherwise he would have been killed,” he said, adding that at one point Russian signal intelligence, which was tracking the president’s motorcade route, realized that he was about to be ambushed.

Yanukovich himself didn’t want to leave and rejected the offer to be evacuated from Donetsk, Putin said.

Only after spending several days in Crimea and realizing that “there was no one he could negotiate with in Kiev” he asked to be taken to Russia.

READ MORE: US boosting ‘anti-propaganda’ budget, mulling ‘increase of lethality’ for Ukraine support – Nuland

http://wp.me/p5GMtX-ds

Goodbye gridlock! Fifth Element-style flying cars hit the skies by 2017

Slovak company AeroMobil has been developing a futuristic vision of real flying cars. Now, for the first time, its CEO puts a proper timeline on the idea: the expensive toys are to hit the super-rich market by 2017, but quickly improve on specs and price. AeroMobil’s new concept is the third stab at the project, and it looks quite spectacular. thus hails the recent press release. And here's the video to back up their claims.


Cute, but...

IT'S ALL MILITARY AIRSPACE for the foreseeable future!

Where you gonna fly this delightful wobbling thing? Certainly not from town to town in any old arbitrary fashion. Imagine how far ahead 'the general public sky-driver' is gonna have to plan his life to get permission to trespass into military airspace.

Ben Fulford Blurb: Global Khazarian Crime Syndicate is Being Dismantled by White Hats

Big Public Announcements and News Events Make It Clear Khazarian Rule Is Ending

There can be no doubt now that the global Khazarian crime syndicate is being dismantled by white hats in the US and Europe along with their BRICS allies. This can be seen in the many extraordinary events that have been taking place both in public and in secret.

Perhaps the biggest, and hardest to deny, indication that something has changed has been the British governments’ decision to join the China initiated Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank as a founding member. What this means is that the British, and the City of London Financial, district have split with the US financial oligarchs who own the Federal Reserve Board, the IMF and the World Bank. The other thing is that, starting on March 20th, the British bullion banks will cede control of the daily gold price fix to regulators, paving the way for control of the gold market by the BRICS. This means that London, Singapore and Hong Kong financial markets are moving to the new financial system. This leaves only two of the world’s major financial markets, Tokyo and New York, under Khazarian control. As you will see below, Tokyo too is about to break free.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/13/white-house-pointedly-asks-uk-to-use-its-voice-as-part-of-chinese-led-bank

The Germans have also openly split with NATO and the US over the Ukraine. Furthermore, there were public announcements last week that the IMF was giving the Ukraine money to pay for its gas bills to Russia. However, it is the Chinese, not the crooks in New York and Washington, who provided the money, according to Japanese military intelligence. What this means is that French and the Frankfurt based German financial oligarchs have also split with the New York and Washington based Khazarian Mafiosi. In other words, Europe has joined with the BRICS.

Another, perhaps equally big change, was the announcement by Pope Francis last week that there would be a jubilee year starting on December 8th. The jubilee will be “dedicated to mercy” according to Pope Francis.

http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/lifestyle/2015/03/14/pope-francis-announces-jubilee-year-dedicated-to-mercy/

This seems to be a request for forgiveness by ordinary people once they learn of the enormous crimes perpetrated against them by the Khazarian cabal. However, Vatican P2 freemason sources say this jubilee will also involve... Fulford's blog..