Tuesday, March 17, 2015

THEY'RE BACK!!! ATF & White House: "We didn't cave on GUN AMMO BAN"!

The ATF’s Ammo Ban Is Back…in the Form of a New Bill From Democrats of course!  Who else would you expect?

Mar. 16, 2015 10:37am

Four House Democrats have taken the Obama administration’s idea of a regulation to ban a widely used kind of ammunition — one it had to pull back because it was so unpopular — and turned it into legislation.

Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) introduced the Armor Piercing Bullets Act, which he said would ban the sale of “.223-dervied, 5.56x45mm NATO ‘green tip’ rounds” that are commonly used on the AR-15 rifle. That’s the same ban that the ATF proposed in February, through the adoption of a “framework” that would justify a ban on all bullets that can pierce police body armor.    


 

The ATF’s framework prompted the submission of almost 90,000 comments, most of which opposed the plan as one that would ban a popular round used in a popular rifle. For years, these green tip rounds have enjoyed an exception from a ban on armor-piercing bullets, because they are generally used for sporting purposes.
But even when announcing that this framework would be indefinitely delayed, the ATF indicated it would continue to work on the issue and see if there’s a way to implement its framework. At a hearing last week, ATF Director B. Todd Jones said his agency was “figuring out how we do this rationally.”
Engel was more direct, and said the ATF had it right, and that it’s framework should now be implemented via legislation.
“As the ATF rightly pointed out, these rounds can easily be loaded into concealed pistols and other short guns, making them particularly dangerous to police officers,” Engel noted. “The well-being of the men and women who protect us should not, and need not, be a partisan issue. I encourage all of my colleagues in Congress to support this obvious measure that will, if enacted, save lives.”
Engel blamed the gun industry for promoting the use of armor-piercing bullets.
“There is absolutely no compelling argument to be made for anyone else to have access to them,” he said. “But the out of touch gun industry lobby is fighting tooth and nail to keep cop-killing ammunition on the streets.”
Republican senators opposed to the ATF’s proposal said last week that the real issue is how banning a popular cartridge makes it harder for people to exercise their Second Amendment rights.
“If law-abiding gun owners cannot obtain rifle ammunition, or face substantial difficulty in finding ammunition available and at reasonable prices because government entities are banning such ammunition, then the Second Amendment is at risk,” dozens of senators wrote in a letter to the ATF.
Other Democrats supporting Engel’s bill are Reps. Yvette Clarke (N.Y.), Carolyn Maloney (N.Y.), and Bonnie Watson Coleman (N.J.).




4 comments:

Anonymous said...

do not forget he got a 1 million dollar bribe for writing it also! iran the boogie man for 20 years what a joke

Anonymous said...

Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) (ALIAS ASSHOLE) introduced the Armor Piercing Bullets Act, which he said would ban the sale of “.223-dervied, 5.56x45mm NATO ‘green tip’ rounds” that are commonly used on the AR-15 rifle. That’s the same ban that the ATF proposed in February, through the adoption of a “framework” that would justify a ban on all bullets that can pierce police body armor. DOESN'T HE MEAN THE NAZI'S BODY ARMOR..... THESE GUYS REALLY PLAY AROUND WITH WORDS....SORT OF REMINDS ME OF AN EXPRESSION MY DAD USE TO SAY....."THEY DON'T KNOW SHIT FROM SHINEOLA"..... OR ....... "THEY DON'T KNOW THEIR ASS FROM A HOLE IN THE GROUND" ....EITHER WAY THESE IDIOTS NEED TO GO BYE BYE....

Anonymous said...

THEY ARE NOT THE POLICE, BUT COMMIE NAZI SS....IN DISGUISE...

Anonymous said...

I fear how little of the country's 'history' these three female representatives from
New York and New Jersey know.

It's to bad those in office don't have to take a proficiency test demonstrating some knowledge and command
of our founding 'documents', the ones this country is founded on.

They don't seem to have thought it through well enough, unless they had agendas before they got into office
to bend and stretch the issues or pet projects.

Maybe they were pressured or influenced financially or otherwise.
Either way, those with this kind of thinking show they don't think enough of the 2nd amendment
to defend it in it's entirety.

And that's a slippery slope we can never step onto.