This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our freedom. County, State, and National Assemblies are forming across our world nullifying the corrupt corporations. Watch and become AWARE! Participate and be a part of making history!
62 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.
Russian president says currency union with Belarus and Kazakhstan could help overcome falling oil prices and decline of rouble
123
189
0
3
315
Email
Kazakhstan's President Nursultan Nazarbayev (C), his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin (L) and his Belarussian counterpart Alexander Nazarbayev meet in AstanaPhoto: Reuters
Reuters
1:31PM GMT 20 Mar 2015
Vladimir Putin proposed on Friday creating a regional currency union with Belarusand Kazakhstan, Russia's partners in a political and economic union made up of former Soviet republics.
Mr Putin made his proposal at a meeting with the Belarussian and Kazakh presidents which highlighted the challenges facing the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union following the fall in global oil prices and the decline of the Russian rouble.
"The time has come to start thinking about forming a currency union," Mr Putin said after the talks in the Kazakh capital Astana with Belarussian President Alexander Lukashenko and Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev.
The Russian president speaks in the Kazakh capital Astana (Getty)
He gave no details of the proposal but suggested it would be easier to meet economic challenges by working closely together.
Mr Lukashenko and Mr Nazarbayev did not immediately respond to the proposal in public, but analysts say it is unlikely to get off the ground.
Kazakhstan, the second-largest post-Soviet oil producer and economy after Russia, has traditionally been lukewarm to the idea of introducing a common currency, saying that first the three nations should synchronise their monetary policies.
Grigory Marchenko, a key Kazakh reformer and former central bank head, has estimated that it would take 10 to 12 years before such a currency is launched.
The Russian rouble's decline has hit former Soviet trading partners such as Belarus and Kazakhstan.
The Russian rouble has declined by about 40 percent against the US dollar since midway through last year, Belarus devalued its own rouble in January and there has been speculation on markets that Kazakhstan may soon devalue its tenge currency.
The first total solar eclipse to occur in four years took place this morning and made for some beautiful photos, but not these ones. As with many big celestial moments that receive a lot of attention leading up to the event, some fake images or pictures from solar eclipse past are being shared. Here’s one to watch out for:
The image in the tweet above was actually called out as a fake a few years ago. Discover Magazine’s blog pointed out at the time when some were saying it showed an eclipse from the International Space Station that it’s actually artwork by a Japanese artist. Neetzan Zimmerman for The Hill pointed out that the artistic image has been shared more than 15,000 times, compared to a real photo taken by an ISS astronaut that has only been shared around 700 times. This photo is also circulating on Twitter. It’s real but from a solar eclipse in the past, according to Discover Magazine:
Not 2015!
Now for the good stuff. These are some other legitimate photos from the eclipse that took place Friday morning:
A bird is silhouetted on the moon blocking part of the sun during a solar eclipse in St.Petersburg, Russia, Friday, March 20, 2015. An eclipse is darkening parts of Europe on Friday in a rare solar event that won’t be repeated for more than a decade. (AP/Dmitry Lovetsky)
The moon blocks part of the sun during a solar eclipse as seen over a statue at the one of the city landmarks, the General Staff Headquarters in St.Petersburg, Russia, Friday, March 20, 2015. (AP/Dmitry Lovetsky)
The moon blocks part of the sun during a partial eclipse over Brussels, Belgium on Friday, March 20, 2015. (AP/Virginia Mayo)
On this photo taken through a solar filter material, the moon blocks part of the sun during a solar eclipse as seen over Moscow Kremlin’s Troitskaya (Trinity) tower, in Russia, on Friday, March 20, 2015. An eclipse is darkening parts of Europe on Friday in a rare solar event that won’t be repeated for more than a decade.(AP/Pavel Golovkin)
The solar eclipse is partially visible above Stonehenge, Salisbury Plain, England Friday March 20, 2015. An eclipse is darkening parts of Europe on Friday in a rare solar event that won’t be repeated for more than a decade. (AP/PA, Andrew Matthews)
The Faeroes and Svalbard were the only two places on land where the eclipse could be seen in full.
Despite the clouds in the Faeroes, tourists and residents in Torshavn alike hooted and applauded as the daylight dimmed for about 2 minutes and 45 seconds.
“It was a pretty big disappointment not to be able to see the sun,” said Janaki Lund Jensen, who had sailed from Copenhagen with 884 others to see the eclipse. Hotel rooms have been booked for years as thousands came to the Faeroe Islands to try to see the eclipse.
Sigrun Skalagard, in the northern parts of the Faeroes, said birds there went silent and dogs started howling. “Some people were surprised to see how fast it became dark,” she said.
A partial solar eclipse could be Friday across Europe and parts of Asia and Africa. Britain’s Met Office says 95 percent of the sun was covered in the Hebrides, Orkneys and Shetland Islands, and one percent less in in further south in Glasgow and Edinburgh.
In Copenhagen, the sun was 85 percent covered up while 80 percent was hidden in southern Sweden. However, cloudy weather put a lid across large parts of the continent, making it hard to see the eclipse.
The next total solar eclipse is set for August 12, 2026.
— The Associated Press contributed to this report. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/03/20/if-you-see-this-photo-of-the-solar-eclipse-dont-share-it/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_term=Firewire&utm_campaign=Firewire%20-%20HORIZON%203-20-15%20FINAL
COMIC RELIEF....PLEASE POST COMMENTS....HAVE FUN!!
OK...FOR ALL YOU TONY LISTENERS... HERE IS HIS LATEST.... DIATRIBE!!
HERE IS SOME REAL LIVE HUMOR....
INTERNATIONAL: All of world on lock down and incredibly frustrated this has not happened yet. Tests run since Wednesday afternoon.
Live rates throughout the world all week.
Tony: Even though we are where we are, I don’t see it happening today.
Could be this afternoon. . . tonight . . . Sunday morning.
CURRENT WINDOW:DC: Expecting this at any time . . .banks geared up again for this evening, tonight, all this weekend throughout the world. Geared up for it. . . Told everyone to be on their toes waiting for it. Entire world waiting.
DC: Iraq is ready. Today their Sabbath. Announced in mosque it would really happen this time. Federation Council, Council of Ministers, Dr. Abadhi’s office telling the people, “Get ready! Get ready!” Rumors abundant of when this will be triggered. TV saying pay attention.
DC’s Bottom Line: More positive info. . .Don’t know the exact time. Hanging on the edge. Not connected to anything but not falling.
Tony: Today is another Friday. Here, where we shouldn’t be. . .we’re closer. We were asked to be “super sensitive” today. . . When Baghdad gets paid, we get paid.
Tony: We say it’s a real mess but they are doing it according to the plan they have laid out. . . Changing the way they do business . . . at the same time they are giving the money.
IRAQ: Parts of Baghdad are getting paid. They were told it would be there when they woke up on Thursday. Tony: I don’t see it stretching out further.
DC: Cards are being adjusted upwards from $3.58 to $3.91 as well as past payments that have been due for a decade are getting paid.
Celebrations were held regarding victory of ISIL this last week on Wed. Did not wake up to reforms on Thursday. More celebrations planned for this weekend. Memo’s went out yesterday to all government offices to prepare for celebrations again.
CBI
Banks
TV/Media still saying they are in the 4th stage of monetary reform. Same info from Wednesday is still being repeated today.
INTERNATIONAL:
UNITED STATES:All the bankers, UST, Federal Reserve, rest of the world on lockdown from last Wednesday on.Heads of banks complained they couldn’t do that but have had their communications shut down, monitored too.
Lockheed Martin’s F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is, for better or worse, the future of American military airplanes. With Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps versions each costing over $100 million, the plane is a jack-of-some-trades approach designed to replace a total of 10 older airplane models used by America and its allies. The F-35 has a lot of very different-sized shoes to fill, and it’s going to do something new: carry a cyber-attack weapon.
Like many new weapons systems, the cyberpod is cloaked in secrecy. Rear Admiral Randy Mahr, a program director on the F-35, told IHS Jane's that “industry is developing a pod that would not degrade the signature of the airplane.” Translation: The cyberpod is probably an external weapon that won't make the F-35 any less stealthy than it is now. Cyber-attack is a broad category that encompasses everything from jamming signals to destroying laboratory equipment (i.e. centrifuges to refine weapons-grade nuclear materials) with malicious code. The common thread is that all cyber attacks target computers in some form or another.
We don't yet know what the F-35’s cyberpod will do. But in 2010 the U.S. Navy revealed its goal develop existing cyber-weapon technologies into a “Next Generation Jammer.” Made by Raytheon, the jammer fools hostile radar systems by receiving those signals, then sending back false ones directly to the source. Fast-forward five years, and it's almost certain the jammer has evolved--and that the cyberpod could do more than the jamming devices currently carried by naval aircraft. If not, what’s the cyberpoint?
By issuing his directives as "memoranda" rather than executive orders, Obama has downplayed the extent of his executive actions.
WASHINGTON — President Obama has issued a form of executive action known as the presidential memorandum more often than any other president in history — using it to take unilateral action even as he has signed fewer executive orders. When these two forms of directives are taken together, Obama is on track to take more high-level executive actions than any president since Harry Truman battled the "Do Nothing Congress" almost seven decades ago, according to a USA TODAY review of presidential documents.
Obama has issued executive orders to give federal employees the day after Christmas off, to impose economic sanctions and to determine how national secrets are classified. He's used presidential memoranda to make policy on gun control, immigration and labor regulations. Tuesday, he used a memorandum to declare Bristol Bay, Alaska, off-limits to oil and gas exploration.
Like executive orders, presidential memoranda don't require action by Congress. They have the same force of law as executive orders and often have consequences just as far-reaching. And some of the most significant actions of the Obama presidency have come not by executive order but by presidential memoranda.
Obama has made prolific use of memoranda despite his own claims that he's used his executive power less than other presidents. "The truth is, even with all the actions I've taken this year, I'm issuing executive orders at the lowest rate in more than 100 years," Obama said in a speech in Austin last July. "So it's not clear how it is that Republicans didn't seem to mind when President Bush took more executive actions than I did."
Obama has issued 195 executive orders as of Tuesday. Published alongside them in the Federal Register are 198 presidential memoranda — all of which carry the same legal force as executive orders.
He's already signed 33% more presidential memoranda in less than six years than Bush did in eight. He's also issued 45% more than the last Democratic president, Bill Clinton, who assertively used memoranda to signal what kinds of regulations he wanted federal agencies to adopt. Obama is not the first president to use memoranda to accomplish policy aims. But at this point in his presidency, he's the first to use them more often than executive orders.
"There's been a lot of discussion about executive orders in his presidency, and of course by sheer numbers he's had fewer than other presidents. So the White House and its defenders can say, 'He can't be abusing his executive authority; he's hardly using any orders," said Andrew Rudalevige, a presidency scholar at Bowdoin College. "But if you look at these other vehicles, he has been aggressive in his use of executive power."
So even as he's quietly used memoranda to signal policy changes to federal agencies, Obama and his allies have claimed he's been more restrained in his use of that power. In a Senate floor speech in July, Majority Leader Harry Reid said, "While Republicans accuse President Obama of executive overreach, they neglect the fact that he has issued far fewer executive orders than any two-term president in the last 50 years." The White House would not comment on how it uses memoranda and executive orders but has previously said Obama's executive actions "advance an agenda that expands opportunity and rewards hard work and responsibility." "There is no question that this president has been judicious in his use of executive action, executive orders, and I think those numbers thus far have come in below what President George W. Bush and President Bill Clinton did," said Jay Carney, then the White House press secretary, in February.
Carney, while critical of Bush's executive actions, also said it wasn't the number of executive actions that was important but rather "the quality and the type."
"It is funny to hear Republicans get upset about the suggestion that the president might use legally available authorities to advance an agenda that expands opportunity and rewards hard work and responsibility, when obviously they supported a president who used executive authorities quite widely," he said. While executive orders have become a kind of Washington shorthand for unilateral presidential action, presidential memoranda have gone largely unexamined. And yet memoranda are often as significant to everyday Americans than executive orders. For example: • In his State of the Union Address in January, Obama proposed a new retirement savings account for low-income workers called a MyRA. The next week, he issued a presidential memorandum to the Treasury Department instructing it to develop a pilot program. • In April, Obama directed the Department of Labor to collect salary data from federal contractors and subcontractors to monitor whether they're paying women and minorities fairly. • In June, Obama told the Department of Education to allow certain borrowers to cap their student loan payments at 10% of income. They can also be controversial.
AVOIDING 'IMPERIAL OVERREACH' Obama issued three presidential memoranda after the Sandy Hook school shooting two years ago. They ordered federal law enforcement agencies to trace any firearm that's part of a federal investigation, expanded the data available to the national background check system, and instructed federal agencies to conduct research into the causes and possible solutions to gun violence. Two more recent memos directed the administration to coordinate an overhaul of the nation's immigration system — a move that congressional Republicans say exceeded his authority. Of the dozens of steps Obama announced as part of his immigration plan last month, none was accomplished by executive order. Executive orders are numbered — the most recent, Executive Order 13683, modified three previous executive orders. Memoranda are not numbered, not indexed and, until recently, difficult to quantify.
Kenneth Lowande, a political science doctoral student at the University of Virginia, counted up memoranda published in the Code of Federal Regulations since 1945. In an article published in the December issue of Presidential Studies Quarterly, he found that memoranda appear to be replacing executive orders.
Indeed, many of Obama's memoranda do the kinds of things previous presidents did by executive order.
• In 1970, President Nixon issued an executive order on unneeded federal properties. Forty years later, Obama issued a similar policy by memorandum. • President George W. Bush established the Bob Hope American Patriot Award by executive order in 2003. Obama created the Richard C. Holbrooke Award for Diplomacy by memorandum in 2012.
• President Bush issued Executive Order 13392 in 2005, directing agencies to report on their compliance with the Freedom of Information Act. On his week in office, Obama directed the attorney general to revisit those reports — but did so in a memorandum. "If you look at some of the titles of memoranda recently, they do look like and mirror executive orders," Lowande said. The difference may be one of political messaging, he said. An "executive order," he said, "immediately evokes potentially damaging questions of 'imperial overreach.'" Memorandum sounds less threatening.
Though they're just getting attention from some presidential scholars, White House insiders have known about the power of memoranda for some time. In a footnote to her 1999 article in the Harvard Law Review, former Clinton associate White House counsel Elena Kagan — now an Obama appointee to the U.S. Supreme Court — said scholars focused too much on executive orders rather than presidential memoranda. Kagan said Clinton considered memoranda "a central part of his governing strategy," using them to spur agencies to write regulations restricting tobacco advertising to children, allowing unemployment insurance for paid family leave and requiring agencies to collect racial profiling data.
"The memoranda became, ever increasingly over the course of eight years, Clinton's primary means, self-consciously undertaken, both of setting an administrative agenda that reflected and advanced his policy and political preferences and of ensuring the execution of this program," Kagan wrote. WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE? (Boy! THAT sure sounds familiar, doesn't it?!)
Presidential scholar Phillip Cooper calls presidential memoranda "executive orders by another name, and yet unique." The law does not define the difference between an executive order and a memorandum, but it does say that the president should publish in the Federal Register executive orders and other documents that "have general applicability and legal effect." "Something that's in a presidential memorandum in one administration might be captured in an executive order in another," said Jim Hemphill, the special assistant to the director for the government's legal notice publication. "There's no guidance that says, 'Mr. President, here's what needs to be in an executive order.' " There are subtle differences. Executive orders are numbered; memoranda are not. Memoranda are always published in the Federal Register after proclamations and executive orders. And under Executive Order 11030, signed by President Kennedy in 1962, an executive order must contain a "citation of authority," saying what law it's based on. Memoranda have no such requirement.
Obama, like other presidents, has used memoranda for more routine operations of the executive branch, delegating certain mundane tasks to subordinates. About half of the memoranda published on the White House website are deemed so inconsequential that they're not counted as memoranda in the Federal Register.
Sometimes, there are subtle differences. President Eisenhower signed Executive Order 10789 in 1958 giving emergency contracting authority to the Department of Defense and other Cabinet departments. President Bush added other departments in 2001 and 2003, but he and Obama both used memoranda to give temporary authority to the U.S. Agency for International Development to respond to crises in Iraq and western Africa.
When the president determines the order of succession in a Cabinet-level department — that is, who would take over in the case of the death or resignation of the secretary — he does so by executive order. For other agencies, he uses a memorandum.
Both executive orders and memoranda can vary in importance. One executive order this year changed the name of the National Security Staff to the National Security Council Staff. Both instruments have been used to delegate routine tasks to other federal officials.
'THE FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENT'
Whatever they're called, those executive actions are binding on future administrations unless explicitly revoked by a future president, according to legal opinion from the Justice Department. The Office of Legal Counsel — which is responsible for advising the president on executive orders and memoranda — says there's no difference between the two. "It has been our consistent view that it is the substance of a presidential determination or directive that is controlling and not whether the document is styled in a particular manner," said a 2000 memo from Acting Assistant Attorney General Randolph Moss to the Clinton White House. He cited a 1945 opinion that said a letter from President Franklin Roosevelt carried the same weight as an executive order. The Office of Legal Counsel signs off on the legality of executive orders and memoranda. During the first year of Obama's presidency, the Office of Legal Counsel asked Congress for a 14.5% budget increase, justifying its request in part by noting "the large number of executive orders and presidential memoranda that has been issued." Other classifications of presidential orders carry similar weight. Obama has issued at least 28 presidential policy directives in the area of national security. In a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit last year, a federal court ruled that these, too, are "the functional equivalent of an executive order." Even the White House sometimes gets tripped up on the distinction. Explaining Obama's memoranda on immigration last month, Press Secretary Josh Earnest said the president would happily "tear up his own executive order" if Congress passes an immigration bill. Obama had issued no such executive order. Earnest later corrected himself. "I must have misspoke. I meant executive actions. So I apologize," he said.
How to conduct a study such as was done by the
CDC in regards to Morgellons and not see anything is an old bar trick.
The Bartender tells his wife on the phone he can't see him-- of course
his eyes are covered with his hand.
In the CDC's case they just kept folks out of the study that had symptoms, all but one anyway. One person with Morgellons does not a study make, IMHO.
Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz., is well-known as one of the toughest law enforcement officials in the nation, especially when it comes to enforcing laws against illegal immigration.
The sheriff is even suing the Obama administration
over its plans to change immigration law unilaterally, effectively
granting a form of amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants, which
Sheriff Joe said would make his job much harder.
But it looks like Sheriff Joe may have found himself on the wrong
side of the law for a change, as he has admitted to violating a federal
court order related to a racial profiling case.
Lawyers for both the sheriff and his top aide have agreed that the
two men have committed civil contempt by violating the court order.
They are asking the judge in the case to cancel hearings scheduled for next month that would examine the violations.
According to Newsmax,
Sheriff Joe violated a federal court order that prohibited him from
stopping and detaining individuals based solely on the suspicion that
they are in the country illegally.
The judge expressed concerns about whether or not mere fines will
prevent Sheriff Joe from violating the court order again and was
reportedly considering a separate contempt case that could result in
steeper fines and even a possibility of jail time.
This is simply absurd. The judge’s order was designed in the first
place solely to prevent the sheriff from doing his job, which is to
protect his community from criminal threats.
Much to the contrary of what we hear from the Obama administration and the mainstream media, the southern border is not secure.
Illegal immigrants continue to flood into the United States
every day, accompanied by criminals, cartel and gang members, drug
smugglers, human traffickers, weapons dealers and, of course,
terrorists.
If law enforcement officials aren’t allowed to detain someone that
they suspect of the crime of being in the country illegally, that
prevents them from effectively protecting their community, as they must
now wait until some additional law has been broken before investigating.
Hopefully, Sheriff Joe will not face a stiff punishment for simply
doing his job, despite the ridiculous court order designed to prevent
him from doing so. http://conservativetribune.com/judge-sheriff-joe-prison/
So
one has to wonder if Morgellons has a different name in the US already
and thereby giving reason that the CDC ignored it. Funny they don't just
say what it is if that is the case? Perhaps not enough folks are dead
or dying yet?
Many Blessings, as the Earth needs them as well as the People of the Earth,
CrystalRiver
Ya ever heard that old saying, “Ya catch more flies with honey than with vinegar”?
Ah good, because DC and “the City” sure haven’t!
As many here know, the East has been trying to formulate its banking alternatives for its member states these past several years.
This is of monumental importance to Eurasian
alliances, because without a network of lending institutions of their
own, they’ve often been at the (lack of) mercy of the Western banking
powers.
For several years now, Eastern alliances such as the BRICS, have made a great deal of progress on this front.
That progress has been met with fear and
loathing from DC and London, as previously, they’ve enjoyed the perks
from being the world’s predatory lender through institutions like the
World Bank and IMF.
During the last week however, while many of us
weren’t looking, some very interesting developments have been taking
place on the “grand chessboard”!
In times past, especially since the previous
“Cold-War”, DC’s full-spectrum control of the geopolitical arena has
been almost absolute.
Since they and London had owned “all the
gold”(on paper, at least), and had the lending institutions(the IMF,
World Bank) to pile debt atop it, as well as the largest, deep-state
apparatus, and military-industrial industries to depend on, they’ve
basically used a very short list of “strategies” to bring other peoples
and nations “to heel”.
In fact, previously if any national leader told
DC “no!” to things like “opening up trade” or dealing with the IMF, they
were usually all told:
DC: “Heeeey, that’s ok! You don’t have to say yes or anything like that!”
Anyone else: “We don’t?”
DC: “Noo sirree, but just know, between us, you’ll have to pick from a litany of other options!”
Anyone Else:” Other options, like what?”
DC: “Oh, swell things! Like”:
Internet Spying and Sabotage!
Obliteration of your Currency!
Or violent overthrow!
DC: “The last one’s our personal favorite! So, which will it be?”
Anyone Else: “Uh, where do we sign?”
Banking Monopoly is Over
That’s all changing, and changing quickly, as
the Eastern Alliance has been fast-tracking several financial and
lending competitors to DC’s money mafia.
Things like the BRICS Bank, which now carries
over $100 billion in assets to help shield its members from
financial/currency crisis(which they’ll likely have to use soon), have
made enormous headway.
Now though, you can add to the list of worries for the ruling order, the fledgling Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank(AIIB).
PLEASE GET INVOLVED! MAKE YOUR VOICE TO BE HEARD NOW!!!
"New Internet Regulations Finally Released By The Federal Communications Commission Make 46 References To A Group Funded By Billionaire George Soros And Co-Founded By A Neo-Marxist." -The Daily Caller
But please... keep reading... because what you're about to see may be the most shocking thing that you've read in years. Almost two weeks after voting on secret regulations to facilitate Barack Hussein Obama's takeover of the Internet, Barack Obama's FCC finally released 400 pages of these so-called Net Neutrality regulations to the public and it's far worse than we could have ever imagined.
Based on references in the regulations alone, it is clear that Barack Obama's takeover of the Internet was actually written - in large part - by radical Marxist-leaning organizations; and it has also come to light that radical socialist-leaning organizations funded by Billionaire Socialist George Soros and others have spent approximately 200 MILLION DOLLARS ($200,000,000.00) to make Barack Obama's tyrannical and dictatorial takeover of the Internet a reality. And we have only one hope of stopping this master plan to transform the United States into a socialist utopia. As of this writing, Representative Marsha Blackburn and 43 other Republicans have signed onto legislation (H.R. 1212: The Internet Freedom Act) that will totally reverse this dictatorial Obama-FCC dictate... but this legislation is stalled in committee because John Boehner and Mitch McConnell are in no rush to bring it to the floor of the House and the Senate for a vote... and that needs to change right now.
Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. Or alternatively, send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives.
It's No Conspiracy Theory. The Socialists Are At The Gates And So-Called Net Neutrality Is Part Of A Master Plan To Transform The United States Into A Socialist Country.
Millions of dollars of funding from Socialist Billionaire George Soros? ... Neo-Marxists calling the shots? ... While it may sound like a conspiracy theory, it is all, unfortunately, true... As a matter of fact, it's actually much worse than you may think.
The organization whose net neutrality arguments are cited at least 46 times in the Obama-FCC dictatorial regulations is ironically named Free Press. Free Press is funded by George Soros' Open Society Foundation and other left-wing groups like the Ford Foundation; and it was founded by Robert McChesney, an avowed Socialist who is presently a communications professor at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. And to McChesney so-called Net Neutrality is simply a means to an end. Specifically, it's the first step to be taken to fundamentally transform the United States into a socialist tyranny. Don't take our word for it. Read what McChesney says about it for yourself:
According to DiscovertheNetworks.org, McChesney "told the website SocialistProject that 'unless you make significant changes in the media, it will be vastly more difficult to have a revolution.'"
Back in 2009, McChesney wrote that "any serious effort to reform the media system would have to necessarily be part of a revolutionary program to overthrow the capitalist system itself... to remove brick by brick the capitalist system itself, rebuilding the entire society on socialist principles... We need to do whatever we can to limit capitalist propaganda, regulate it, minimize it, and perhaps even eliminate it."
DiscovertheNetworks.org again: "In a November 2000 Monthly Review article titled 'Journalism, Democracy, and Class Struggle,' he [McChesney] wrote: 'Our job is to make media reform part of our broader struggle for democracy, social justice, and, dare we say it, socialism.'"
Phil Kerpen, president of the free-market group American Commitment says that Chesney's goal is "to empower the federal government to ration and apportion Internet bandwidth as it sees fit, and to thereby control the Internet's content."
And McChesney said, back in 2009, when the concept of Net Neutrality was focused on more traditional means of communication: "At the moment, the battle over network neutrality is not to completely eliminate the telephone and cable companies. We are not at that point yet. But the ultimate goal is to get rid of the media capitalists in the phone and cable companies and to divest them from control."
Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. Or alternatively, send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives. Send My Blast Faxes
What Would You Say If The Government Had The Authority To Order Your Local AM/FM Radio Stations To Stop Broadcasting your favorite radio shows?
If everything we have said thus far sounds far-fetched, consider just one example of what is in these 400 pages of Obama-FCC regulations.
Here's what the FCC says about First Amendment rights in Section 544:
"The rules we adopt today do not curtail broadband providers' free speech rights. When engaged in broadband Internet access services, broadband providers are not speakers, but rather serve as conduits for the speech of others." Here's a question: Do local AM radio stations not "serve as conduits for the speech of others." Come to think of it, is your radio not a "conduit" for the speech of others?
Now, let's be clear. These 400 pages of Obama-FCC regulations only apply to the Internet (at least for now), but the analogy should serve to illustrate EXACTLY what Barack Obama, George Soros and the FCC are thinking when it comes to your First Amendment rights.
If you're not a "speaker," the First Amendments doesn't apply to you. And who determines whether or not you're a "speaker" Why... none other than Barack Hussein Obama.
The thinking is straight out of George Orwell's Animal Farm. Barack Obama doesn't need to control your speech if he can control the "conduits" of your speech.
And that's exactly what he intends to do. If you like your Internet, you can keep your Internet and if you like your First Amendment rights, you can keep your First Amendment rights... You can say whatever you want but lots of luck when it comes to anyone actually hearing what you have to say or you hearing what others have to say to you because Barack Obama will control the "conduits" of speech.
Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. Or alternatively, send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives.
Center for Individual Freedom 815 King Street Suite 303 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone: 703-535-5836 Fax: 703-535-5838
CFIF is a 501(c)(4) not-for-profit constitutional advocacy organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights. Contributions to CFIF are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes.
Godfather Politics 3190 Florence Road Powder Springs, GA 30127 USA
Are you in doubt that the real original jurisdiction De Jure Republic is being restored? Do you have Questions that you want answered? Do you want to get involved? Visit https://national-assembly.net/ for more information and to participate. Check out the forums as the national assembly is 100% transparent to the public and welcomes public participation. This is the real deal folks. This is our last chance to do it right and nullify the 1871 contract that employed the U.S. Corporation to provide 19 governmental services to the people. This is our right under Article 1 of the Bill of rights. This also nullifies General Order 100 of 1863.
Search This Blog "if this search box is working"
Donation to assist in efforts to restore our republic
The DUKE - Patriot!
Born in 1948 Died in 2015
National Assembly of the people returning to self governance
Join the forums and introduce yourself so your state coordinator can connect with you.
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?
Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle
11
Followers
The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.
Gregory Korte
According to DiscovertheNetworks.org, McChesney 
