THE NEW DEFINITION OF MURDER UNDER LAW. FROM ERASMUS OF AMERICA - SEPT. 11, 2015
asset forfeiture "legal
robbery" and "completely unconstitutional"
By Jason Pye
15 hours ago
The federal government's civil asset forfeiture laws have been the target of well-deserved and long overdue criticism from conservatives, libertarians, and even progressives. As FreedomWorks recently noted in From High Seas to Highway Robbery, federal civil asset forfeiture laws, throw the presumption of innocence, a cornerstone of the American legal system out the window.
The Fifth Amendment states, without any ambiguity, that [n]o person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. But federal forfeiture laws ignore due process because these cases are handled in civil court as opposed to criminal court, where proof beyond a reasonable doubt is required to secure a conviction. Under federal forfeiture laws, federal prosecutors need only show a "preponderance of the evidence," a very low standard, to subject property to forfeiture. And in a stroke of legal fiction, seized property is guilty until proven innocent by the property owner, who may never be charged with a crime.
In a recent report, the Cincinnati Enquirer explained that fighting a forfeiture can be a difficult and costly process, using Antoinette Lattimore as the focal point of the story. A couple years ago, Lattimore was traveling through Dayton, Ohio on her way to Arizona. She was carrying nearly $20,000 in cash with which to purchase art. She was pulled over by a local law enforcement official, who worked with a federal drug task force, and the cash was seized based on the suspicion that it was connected to illicit activity.
"I had no idea something like this could happen in America," Lattimore told the Cincinnati Enquirer. "I've never been arrested before in my life. I even could prove that it was my money but that didn't matter." Lattimore was not charged with a crime, but state and local law enforcement are incentivized to seize cash and property from even the innocent because, through the Department of Justice's Equitable Sharing Program, they can receive up to 80 percent of the proceeds from forfeitures.
This handy chart from the Heritage Foundation outlines the bureaucratic process even innocent people must go through to get their property back from the federal government (click here to view an enlarged version):
Between 2003 and 2011, the Department of Justice's Equitable Sharing Program received $11 billion in revenues and disbursed more than $3.1 billion in payments to federal, state, and local law enforcement, according to the Government Accountability Office. Much of the remaining funds are used "in support of asset forfeiture activities," including the costs associated with "seizing, evaluating, inventorying, maintaining, protecting, advertising, forfeiting, and disposing of property seized for forfeiture."
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), whose district is based in Northern Kentucky, blasted federal forfeiture laws, which, he rightly says, are unconstitutional. "This is legal robbery ... and is completely unconstitutional," Massie said. "I don't care what good they can do with that money if it was acquired unconstitutionally."
Rather than fight a lengthy battle with an uncertain outcome, Lattimore settled with the federal government. She received $11,000 of the wrongfully seized cash back, but she kept approximately $8,000 after legal expenses. The cost burden on innocent property owners, who are not entitled to an attorney under federal forfeiture laws, is a deterrent. "It could easily cost someone $10,000 in legal fees to get $10,000 back," Massie noted, "given all the red tape they have to fight." Many walk away from what they see as an unwinnable fight, or, like Lattimore, settle to get at least some of their money back.
In January, FreedomWorks released a letter of support for the Fifth Amendment Integrity Restoration (FAIR) Act (H.R. 540/S. 255). The bill, sponsored by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) in the Senate and Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) in the House, raises the standard of evidence required to subject property to forfeiture to "clear and convincing," the highest in civil court, and places the burden of proof on the government, where it belongs.
The FAIR Act requires a hearing after 14 days, where the government must establish probable cause for the seizure, or return the property to its owner. Importantly, the bill also eliminates the profit motive by directing proceeds from federal forfeitures to the Treasury Department's general fund.
Whether the FAIR Act is the vehicle for federal forfeiture reform or some other yet to be introduced bill, Congress has to act to ensure that forfeiture laws are being used only against their intended targets, such as drug kingpins and traffickers, and not innocent people like Antoinette Lattimore.
Tags Civil
Asset Forfeiture, Due
Process Rights, private
property rights, Thomas
Massie, FAIR
Act, equitable
sharing, Equitable
Sharing Program, department
of justice
THE NEW DEFINITION OF MURDER UNDER LAW. FROM ERASMUS OF AMERICA - SEPT. 11, 2015
Blog
California Assembly succumbs to misinformation and bullying from opponents of civil asset forfeiture reform
BY Jason
Pye
13 hours ago
BlogElderly Oklahoma couple experienced government overreach first-hand in a botched raid
BY Jason
Pye
1 day ago
BlogFederal government threatens states considering comprehensive civil asset forfeiture reform
BY Jason
Pye
2 days ago
BlogNo charges filed in more than a third of Oklahoma civil asset forfeiture cases
BY Jason
Pye
09/02/2015
BlogPreserving the Fifth Amendment is the key to civil asset forfeiture reform in Oklahoma
BY Jason
Pye
09/01/2015
Blog
Michigan Senate committee moves protections for innocent property owners a step closer to passage
BY Jason
Pye
08/20/2015
BlogWyoming lawmakers continue to work on long overdue protections for innocent property owners
BY Jason
Pye
08/19/2015
BlogCourt orders return of an innocent man's money, but the federal government isn't letting it go
Private property has always had a unique place in American society. The Founding Fathers recognized that government exists to protect private property. They were influenced by Enlightenment-era philosophers John Locke and Adam Smith, who believed the right to property was a fundamental, natural right.
John Adams, one of the most vocal proponents of independence from the British Crown, famously wrote, "The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence. If 'Thou shalt not covet,' and 'Thou shalt not steal,' were not commandments of Heaven, they must be made inviolable precepts in every society, before it can be civilized or made free."
Similarly, James Madison, the Father of the Constitution, in 1792, wrote, "Government is instituted to protect property of every sort; as well that which lies in the various rights of individuals, as that which the term particularly expresses. This being the end of government, that alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, whatever is his own."
The strong beliefs in private property rights led the framers to put several protections in the Constitution and Bill of Rights, notably the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which prohibits use of eminent domain for public use and requires "just compensation." Sadly, this protection of the cornerstone of liberty have been gutted over time by the Supreme Court.
In June 2005, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in Kelo v. New London that effectively changed the definition of the Takings Clause. Eminent domain, according to the clause, could be used only for a "public use," historically referring to road, government building or public utilities. The decision ostensibly changed "public use" to "public purpose," allowing a government to take property for the sole purpose of enhancing its tax base. This includes a government taking property from one private party and transferring it to another.
The day before Thanksgiving in 2000, Susette Kelo received a condemnation notice from the New London Development Corporation, a private entity working on behalf of the Connecticut city with a population of 25,000 residents at the time. The city wanted the land to expand its tax base, as Pfizer prepared to open a research center in the town, in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood where Kelo and other families who were affected lived.
Kelo and other property unsuccessfully fought this abuse of eminent domain, more accurately defined as theft, in state and federal court. In her dissent in Kelo, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor blasted the majority's ruling. "Any property may now be taken for the benefit of another private party, but the fallout from this decision will not be random. The beneficiaries are likely to be those citizens with disproportionate influence and power in the political process, including large corporations and development firms," she wrote. "The Founders cannot have intended this perverse result."
The Supreme Court's ruling in Kelo was met with public strong opposition. State legislatures acted to shore up private property rights protections in their respective constitution and statutes. Similarly, the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed legislation, the Private Property Rights Protection Act, to address some of the negative affects of the decision. Unfortunately, the Senate never acted on the bill.
The President and Congress Disregard their Oath “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution
BY Ted
Abram
0
I HAVE PAGES OF LINKS SHOWING THAT YOUR
PROPERTY RIGHTS STATED IN THE 4TH AND 5TH AMENDMENTS OF THE U.S. BILL
OF RIGHTS HAVE EFFECTIVELY BEEN OVERTHROWN BY FEDERAL AND STATE
LAW. THIS REPORT BECOMES TOO MASSIVE TO POST ON THE INTERNET
IF I USE ALL THESE LINKS, BUT THE DOCUMENTATION IS MASSIVE THAT THE
FEDERAL AND MOST STATE LAW SOURCES DO NOT CONSIDER THEMSELVES LEGALLY
BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THE 4TH AND 5TH U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS AT THIS
TIME AND JUDGE THAT THEY CAN GET AWAY WITH TRAMPLING OF THESE BILL OF
RIGHTS PROTECTING YOUR PROPERTY WHETHER LAND, HOUSE, BUSINESS, MONEY,
ETC. WHEN YOU ARE HONEST IN LIFE AND NOT COMMITTING ANY CRIMES UNDER
STANDARD LAW. FREE ENTERPRISE CANNOT OPERATE AS THE ECONOMIC SYSTEM
OF THE NATION WHEN YOUR PROPERTY RIGHTS ARE NOT RESPECTED BY LAW.
ABOLISH PROPERTY RIGHTS AND YOU RAPIDLY BECOME A COMMUNIST NATION AS
THERE IS NO BASIS ANY LONGER FOR ANY ECONOMIC SYSTEM OTHER THAN
LIVING UNDER A COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT AND NATION. AT THIS TIME, FOR
EXAMPLE, FEDERAL SOURCES BASED UPON WHIM AND NOT FACTS CAN SEIZE AND
CONFISCATE ALL YOUR LAND AND OTHER PROPERTY INCLUDING ALL MONEY IN
YOUR BANK AND NEVER HAVE TO PROVE THAT YOU WERE GUILTY OF ANY CRIME
UNDER LAW. THEY WANT IT, THEY TAKE ALL YOUR PROPERTY INCLUDING ALL
YOUR MONEY AND KICK YOU OUT IN THE STREET. THIS IS WHERE AMERICAN LAW
HAS LANDED UNDER THE OBAMA APPROACH TO U.S. CONSTITUTION AND U.S.
BILL OF RIGHTS.
YEARS AGO WHEN A MILITARY CADET (HIGH SCHOOL SENIOR) AT A MILITARY ACADEMY, I TOOK A NATIONAL HISTORY TEST GIVEN TO THE TOP HISTORY STUDENTS ACROSS AMERICA IN OUR HIGH SCHOOLS. I APPARENTLY WAS RATED THE TOP HISTORY STUDENT OUT OF AMERICAN HIGH SCHOOLS THAT YEAR AND WON A POSTGRADUATE COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP FOR ALL EXPENSES WHILE STILL IN HIGH SCHOOL. I AM NO AMATEUR AT HISTORICAL STUDIES. THE LEGAL CONCEPT OF LAW AMERICA WAS FOUNDED UPON IN 1776 IS NOW OVERTHROWN UNLESS YOU FORCE LEGAL SOURCES TO ONCE MORE OBEY THE LEGAL TERMS OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION BUT ESPECIALLY THE 4TH AND 5TH U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS OR ELSE YOU HAVE LOST ALL THE LEGAL RIGHTS SECURED BY THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION OF 1776.
IT IS TIME TO ONCE MORE HAVE THE MANHOOD TO ASSERT, UPHOLD, AND ENFORCE YOUR GOD-GIVEN RIGHTS UNDER WHAT IS CALLED LAW IN AMERICA TODAY. IF YOU LET COMMUNISM WIN EFFECTIVE CONTROL OF AMERICA NOW, COMMUNISM HAS THE REPUTATION THAT THEY LOVE TO MASS KILL THEIR OWN CITIZENS ONCE IN EFFECTIVE POWER. RUSSIA PROBABLY HAD 40 TO 50 MILLION RUSSIANS KILLED UNDER COMMUNISM ONCE IT WAS EFFECTIVELY IN POWER. MAO TSE-TUNG WAS BLUNT WHEN INTERVIEWED BY A FRENCH PUBLICATION AND SAID THAT COMMUNISM HAD TO KILL AROUND 50 MILLION CHINESE IN ORDER TO PUT COMMUNISM INTO EFFECTIVE POWER IN CHINA. LOOK AT THE MASSACRE IN OTHER LANDS TAKEN OVER BY COMMUNISM. THEY MASS KILL AS THEIR WAY TO ARGUE WITH YOU WHAT POLITICAL MOVEMENT SHOULD BE IN NATIONAL POWER NOW. YOU DON'T AGREE WITH THEM, YOU DIE!
KARL MARX WROTE THE BOOK "A WORLD WITHOUT JEWS" WHICH COMMUNIST MOSCOW PUBLISHED AND DISTRIBUTED TO AROUND 15,000 COMMUNIST LEADERS IN THE SOVIET UNION WHILE COMMUNISM RULED THE SOVIET UNION. IT WAS UNDERSTOOD THAT COMMUNISM WAS TO EVENTUALLY KILL ALL THE JEWS IN THE SOVIET UNION AND ACROSS THE WORLD AS KARL MARX SAID THE JEWS WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE EVILS IN THE WORLD. ONCE ALL THE JEWS WERE KILLED IN THE WORLD, THEN MANKIND WOULD BE LIBERATED AND THE WORKERS' PARADISE COULD NOW BE ESTABLISHED ON EARTH. KARL MARX HAD LIVED IN AMERICA FOR AWHILE AND DESPISED THE BLACKS. WHEN COMMUNISM WON AMERICA, KARL MARX WANTED ALL THE BLACKS KILLED IN AMERICA AS HE SAID THEY WERE AN INFERIOR RACE AND A SUCCESSFUL COMMUNIST NATION COULD NOT BE BUILT BASED UPON AN "INFERIOR RACE." THE FAVORITE INSULT OF KARL MARX, FOUNDER OF COMMUNISM, FOR THE TWO RACES HE SAVAGELY HATED AND WANTED EXTERMINATED ON EARTH, HE WOULD CALL HIS ENEMIES "NIGGER JEWS" TO SHOW HIS CONTEMPT FOR THEM. YEARS AGO I GOT COMMUNIST BOOKS FROM LONDON, ENGLAND WHICH TOLD OF HIS COLOSSAL CONTEMPT FOR JEWS AND BLACKS IN THE WORLD. KARL MARX WAS ALSO A SATANIST PRIEST AND SAVAGELY HATED THE CHRISTIANS AS WELL WHO HE WANTED CRUSHED IN SOCIETY ONCE COMMUNISM WON WORLD POWER.
IF THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE NOT RESTORED NOW AS CHAMPIONED BY THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION OF 1776, COMMUNISM WINS IN AMERICA AND MASS BLOOD WILL FLOW IN AMERICA UNTIL MUCH OR MOST AMERICANS ARE DEAD IN AMERICA KILLED BY COMMUNIST POLICY. OBAMA WAS AN ADMITTED COMMUNIST WHEN IN COLLEGE AND A FELLOW CLASSMATE FROM THEN SAID OBAMA TOLD HIM THAT HE WAS A DEDICATED COMMUNIST AND THE WAY TO MAKE AMERICA COMMUNIST WAS INFILTRATE THE GOVERNMENT AND MAKE AMERICA COMMUNIST THROUGH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. ALSO, A PENTAGON SPY IN MOSCOW REPORTED BACK TO MILITARY INTELLIGENCE IN WASH., D.C. THAT AN IMPORTANT COMMUNIST OFFICIAL (A WOMAN) IN MOSCOW HAD BOASTED TO HIM THAT THEY HAD GROOMED AN UNKNOWN BLACK BY THE NAME OF OBAMA TO BECOME LATER PRESIDENT OF AMERICA AND HE WOULD MAKE THE GOVERNMENT AND AMERICA COMMUNIST AFTER HE GOT TO THE WHITE HOUSE. PROBABLY THE LEADING COMMUNIST INTELLECTUAL OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS LAUNCHED OBAMA INTO NATIONAL POLITICS. HE WAS LAUNCHING HIM BECAUSE HE WAS A TRAINED COMMUNIST AND SET UP TO BECOME FUTURE PRESIDENT OF AMERICA BY COMMUNIST PLANNING.
NOW AMERICAN PEOPLE, EITHER YOU LEARN TO GET TOUGH AGAINST HIGH TREASON GOING ON IN AMERICA UNDER OBAMA OR MUCH OF AMERICA MAY END UP DEAD THROUGH COMMUNIST PLANNING. AS JESUS CHRIST TAUGHT, YOU HAVE TWO FORMS OF VALID AUTHORITY IN SOCIETY. THAT OF CAESAR MEANING GOVERNMENT AND THAT OF GOD MEANING THE FINAL AUTHORITY OF GOD WHICH IS HIGHER THAN AUTHORITY OF CAESAR IF THE TWO FORMS OF AUTHORITY SHOULD CLASH ON ISSUES. MY PROPOSED OMNI LAW ONCE PASSED IN AMERICA RESTORES EFFECTIVE AUTHORITY OF GOVERNMENT BACK TO THE CHRISTIAN AMERICANS AND OTHER AMERICANS WHOSE ROOTS GO BACK TO THE ORIGINAL AMERICA FOUNDED IN 1776. THE OMNI LAW ENFORCES THE LEGAL RIGHTS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FIRMLY ESTABLISHED BY AMERICAN LAW IN 1776 AND AFTERWARDS BY THE AMERICAN DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION, AND THEN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND THEN U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS AS ITS PREAMBLE STATED WAS HIGHER IN LEGAL AUTHORITY THAN THE REST OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND LAW COULD NOT CHALLENGE THE U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS AS THE SUPREME LEGAL AUTHORITY TO BE OBEYED BY ALL CITIZENS IN THE NATION.
THE INVALID FALSE LAW NOW PUSHED BY OBAMA WAS CALLED IN THE AMERICAN DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE IN 1776 AS "ACTS OF PRETENDED LEGISLATION" MEANING IT HAD NO VALIDITY NOR LEGAL AUTHORITY TO IT. OBAMA HAS FEDERAL SOURCES BELIEVING THAT THEY CAN CONFISCATE ALL YOUR MONEY OUT OF YOUR BANK ACCOUNT ANY TIME THEY WANT TO AND WITHOUT COURT ORDER. ALSO SEIZE ALL YOUR PROPERTY IN OTHER FORMS IF FEDERAL OFFICIALS OR PERSONNEL SO WANT AND DO NOT HAVE TO EVER HAVE TO ANSWER TO COURTS AS TO THE LEGALITY OF THEIR SEIZURE OF YOUR PROPERTY INCLUDING MONEY. AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT NEVER HAS TO RETURN THIS STOLEN MONEY OF YOURS BACK TO YOU LATER ON NOR YOUR LAND OR OTHER PROPERTY YOU OWN BY STEALING SOME OR ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY INCLUDING MONEY AND CALLING IT "SEIZURE." THIS APPROACH TO LAW WHEN YOU ARE NOT LIVING A LIFE OF CRIME TO SUPPORT YOURSELF IS PLAIN THEFT OF YOUR MONEY OR OTHER PROPERTY OF YOURS BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WHICH NEVER PLANS UNDER OBAMA TO RETURN TO YOU THE MONEY AND PROPERTY YOU LEGALLY OWN AND HAVE LEGAL TITLE TO, NOT WASH., D.C. UNDER COMMUNIST OBAMA. WHEN YOUR MONEY AND OTHER PROPERTY ARE ALL STOLEN FROM YOU BY FEDERAL THIEVES UNDER ORDER OF COMMUNIST OBAMA, YOU PROBABLY WILL FIND IT IMPOSSIBLE TO SUPPORT YOURSELF AND FAMILY IN LIFE AFTER THAT. I CALL THIS A SOPHISTICATED FORM OF MURDER UNDER PRETENDED LAW AND SHOULD BE PUNISHED WITH AS MUCH LEGAL HARSHNESS AS ANY OTHER FORM OF MURDER OF YOU.
THE ANCIENT ROMANS WERE A PRACTICAL RACE AND KNEW HOW TO BREAK UP HIGH TREASON LIKE THIS FROM GOVERNMENT. THEY HAD THE POLICY CALLED DECIMATION TO EXECUTE ONE OUT OF EVERY TEN HIGH TREASON OFFENDERS UNTIL ALL GOT THE MESSAGE LOUD AND CLEAR THAT HIGH TREASON WOULD NOT BE TOLERATED FROM THOSE GUILTY OF HIGH TREASON AT THAT TIME. COMMIT TO 100 WORKING FOR THE GOVERNMENT AND TRYING TO STEAL MONEY FROM YOUR BANK ACCOUNT AND OTHER PROPERTY WITHOUT PROVEN CRIMINAL VIOLATION ARE TO BE HUNG AFTER TRIAL BY JURY FROM THE GALLOWS. AND COMPLETING AN OLD ROMAN LEGAL APPROACH TO SHOW YOUR NATIONAL CONTEMPT FOR THESE TRAITORS IN CIVIL GOVERNMENT AND OR MILITARY BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT, YOU CREMATE THEM AFTER THEY DIE ON THE GALLOWS AND THEN THROW THEIR ASHES INTO THE WIND TO SHOW YOUR CONTEMPT FOR THESE TRAITORS OF HIGH TREASON IN AMERICA. ALSO, CONFISCATE THEIR HOMES, MONEY, ETC. AND TURN THIS OVER TO THEIR INTENDED VICTIMS! THIS PUNISHMENT FOR HIGH TREASON BY DESTROYING THE PROPERTY AMERICANS OWN AND HAVE ALL LEGAL RIGHT TO AS THEY DO NOT LIVE AS CRIMINALS BEGINS ON THE DAY THAT THIS REPORT IS POSTED ON THE INTERNET. IF THESE HIGH TREASON TRAITORS ARE TRACED BACK TO SECRET FIGURES SUCH AS THE ROTHSCHILDS, ROCKEFELLERS, ETC., THEN THESE SECRET WOULD-BE RULERS OF AMERICAN SOCIETY CAN HANG ALSO ALONG WITH THEIR FRONT MEN OR WOMEN IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF WASH., D.C. ALSO, 100 FROM STATE GOVERNMENTS CAN FACE THE SAME ROMAN STYLE PUNISHMENT FOR HIGH TREASON AGAINST THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS IF THEY GET CAUGHT. AFTER UP TO 100 FEDERAL OR STATE LEGAL SOURCES ARE EXECUTED THIS WAY FROM THE GALLOWS, THOSE CONVICTED AFTER THIS WILL BE SENTENCED TO LIFETIME IMPRISONMENT WITHOUT CHANCE OF EVER PARDON OR PAROLE. SECRET WOULD-BE RULERS CAUGHT IN THIS LEGAL DRAGNET WILL NOT COUNT AGAINST THE 100 FIGURE QUOTAS FOR EITHER FEDERAL OR STATE GOVERNMENTS. ALSO, MUST NOT FORGET. ANY BANKERS TRY TO STEAL YOUR MONEY FROM YOUR BANK ACCOUNTS, THEY ALSO ENTER A 100 COUNT QUOTA FIGURE FOR THE BANKING SYSTEM IN AMERICA.
AS SOON AS OUR OMNI LAW IS PASSED AS SHOWN ON OUR WEBSITE, WE ENACT THIS 100 QUOTA LAW BY NATIONAL REFERENDUM AND BEGIN LEGAL INVESTIGATIONS INTO WHO TO ARREST UNDER THIS 100 QUOTA LAW. I HAVE SOURCES AND THEY REPORT TO ME THAT OBAMA IS PLANNING TO STEAL YOUR MONEY FROM YOUR BANK ACCOUNTS FOR EITHER MOST OR ALL CITIZENS OF AMERICA. THIS STOPS NOW OR MANY OBAMA SUPPORTERS IN GOVERNMENT WILL HANG FROM THE GALLOWS IF CAUGHT FOR THIS VERSION OF HIGH TREASON, GENOCIDE CONSPIRACY, AND A SOPHISTICATED FORM OF MURDER OF AMERICAN CITIZENS AS NO WAY IS LEFT FOR THESE VICTIM AMERICANS TO LIVE ANY LONGER IN AMERICA.
AMERICAN PEOPLE, IF YOU DO NOT BACK THIS 100 QUOTA LAW AND PASSAGE OF THE OMNI LAW WHILE YOU CAN, WHEN YOUR LIFE SAVINGS ARE STOLEN FROM YOU BY OBAMA AND YOUR HOME, LAND, ETC. IS CONFISCATED BY OBAMA, YOU WILL BE DEFENSELESS UNLESS THIS OMNI LAW IS PASSED NOW AND THEN OUR 100 QUOTA LAW. MIKE KODOSKY OF OMEGA TRUST FROM DUNDEE, ILLINOIS HAD HIS TWO FEET CHOPPED OFF BY THE U.S. JUSTICE DEPT. WHEN HE WOULD NOT TURN OVER TO THEM THE ACCOUNT NAMES HE HAD ACCESS TO SAYING THE MONEY INVOLVED BELONGED TO THOSE WHO BELONGED TO THE OMEGA TRUST GROUP AND NOT TO WASH., D.C. HE WAS A DIABETIC AND THEY WITHHELD INSULIN FROM HIM UNTIL HE WOULD TURN OVER THE ACCOUNTS AND NAMES THAT HE WAS PROTECTING FROM WASH., D.C. CONFISCATION UNDER THE U.S. JUSTICE DEPT. HE DIED OF A HEART ATTACK WHEN THEY CUT OFF DUE TO DIABETICS HIS SECOND FOOT ON THE OPERATING TABLE AT THE HOSPITAL.
AT THE TIME CLYDE HOOD OF OMEGA TRUST WENT TO TRIAL, THEY HAD A WAY OF THREATENING THAT HIS SON WOULD DIE IF HE DID NOT CONFESS TO SAYING THAT HE WAS GUILTY OF THE FEDERAL CHARGES. A WITNESS FOR ME SAID THAT THE U.S. JUSTICE DEPT. HAD GATHERED I THINK THE FIGURE WAS $174 MILLION STATED IN COURT THAT BELONGED TO OMEGA TRUST MEMBERS IN AMERICA AND MEMBERS FROM 26 OR MORE FOREIGN NATIONS BELONGING TO THE UN. DID ANYONE EVER GET ANY MONEY BACK FROM THE U.S. JUSTICE DEPT. OR WAS ALL THE MONEY POCKETED BY THE U.S. JUSTICE DEPT.? WHEN WASH., D.C. STEALS YOUR MONEY, THEY STEAL YOUR MONEY! BACK THE OMNI LAW AND COMING 100 QUOTA LAW OR LIKELY KISS ALL YOUR MONEY IN LIFE GOODBYE BECAUSE OBAMA STOLE IT FROM YOU AS REPORTED TO ME THAT HE PLANS TO DO ONCE READY!
OUR WEBSITE IS WWW.FASTBOOMAMERICANECONOMY.COM OUR EMAIL IS FASTBOOMAMERICANECONOMY.COM@GMAIL.COM YOU CAN PLACE ORDERS FOR PRODUCTS OR ELSE PLACE LOAN MONEY FOR THE OMNI LAW LOAN PROGRAM BOTH ON OUR WEBSITE ALL OF WHICH HELPS FINANCE THE ASSUMED SOON PASSAGE OF THE OMNI LAW IN AMERICA. IF ANY PROBLEM USING THE WEBSITE FOR ORDERS OR ELSE PLACING LOAN MONEY WITH US, USE OUR MAILING ADDRESS. IT IS NIFI, P.O. BOX 1465, SENECA, SC 29679. MAKE CHECKS, ETC. OUT TO NIFI AND TELL US WHAT THE PAYMENT IS FOR.
WASH., D.C. STOLE $525,00 FROM ME A FEW YEARS AGO SO I WOULD NOT HAVE THE MONEY TO START MY FATHER'S VATICAN ENDORSED INDUSTRIAL FOOD PROCESS BACK UP IN AMERICA. POPE PIUS XII ENDORSED IT AS POTENTIALLY THE GREATEST NEWS FOR MANKIND SINCE THE COMING OF CHRIST SINCE IT WAS SO IMPORTANT TO WORLD HEALTH AND COULD SOLVE THE TWIN PROBLEMS OF STARVATION AND MALNUTRITION IN AMERICA AND THE WORLD. OBAMA HAD BLOCKED $400 MILLION COMING TO ME LAST YEAR TO REESTABLISH MY FATHER'S VATICAN ENDORSED INDUSTRIAL FOOD PROCESS. IT DID NOT MATTER THAT UNIVERSITY TESTS SAID THE HUMAN RACE WOULD LATER GO EXTINCT LIKE THE DINOSAURS ON EARTH IF THIS WAS NOT ADDED TO THE AMERICAN AND WORLD DIET IN TIME. ALSO, OVER 2,000 MEDICAL LABS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD PREDICT THE SOON END OF THE HUMAN RACE ON EARTH IF A FOOD LIKE THIS AS AN ANTIDOTE IS NOT BROUGHT FORTH IN TIME TO STOP THE HUMAN RACE FROM GOING BIOLOGICALLY STERILE AS PREDICTED SOON. ONCE THE OMNI LAW IS PASSED, I WILL RECOVER THE SEVERAL AMOUNTS OF LARGE MONEY WASH., D.C. BLOCKED ME FROM RECEIVING OR ELSE STOLE FROM ME WHEN THE MONEY WAS THERE TO FINALLY REESTABLISH MY FATHER'S VATICAN ENDORSED INDUSTRIAL FOOD PROCESS. ALSO, THE SOVIET UNION AS WELL AS THE VATICAN HAD ENDORSED IT AS THE GREATEST FOOD DISCOVERY IN HUMAN HISTORY AND TRIED TO BUY WORLD RIGHTS TO IT FROM MY FATHER. HOWEVER, MY FATHER WOULD NOT SELL TO STALIN AS REPORTED IN THE CATHOLIC DIGEST REPORT ON THIS IN THEIR MONTHLY MAGAZINE BACK IN THE 'FIFTIES.
FULL NAME OF MY OMNI LAW AS SHOWN ON MY WEBSITE IS "THE OMNIBUS CIVIL RIGHTS ACT FOR AMERICA." IT GIVES THE AMERICAN PEOPLE REFERENDUM POWER OVER THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO PASS LAWS AND POLICIES OR ELSE CANCEL LAWS AND POLICIES THAT WASH., D.C. MUST OBEY AND CARRY OUT. ONCE THE OMNI LAW IS PASSED, THE GOVERNMENT WILL ACT AND SOLVE THE PROBLEMS OF AMERICA CONTRARY TO THE U.S. CONGRESS WHICH CREATES PROBLEMS GALORE FOR AMERICA AND SOLVES LITTLE IF ANY OF THEM. UNDER THE OMNI LAW, AMERICA WILL FINALLY BEGIN SOLVING FAST THE PROBLEMS FACING AMERICA.
WITH MAYBE 30 FEDERAL MURDER ATTEMPTS ON ME OVER THE YEARS TRYING TO BLOCK ME FROM REESTABLISHING MY FATHER'S VATICAN ENDORSED INDUSTRIAL FOOD PROCESS TO AMERICA, WASH., D.C. WILL NEVER BE AN HONEST NATIONAL GOVERNMENT AGAIN UNTIL THIS OMNI LAW IS PASSED!
YOURS FOR GOD AND
COUNTRY, ERASMUS OF AMERICA (PEN NAME FOR THAT AMERICAN LEADER WHO
ACTUALLY BELIEVES THAT AMERICA SHOULD BE GIVEN A FUTURE UNDER FREEDOM
OF LAW INSTEAD OF A NATIONAL FUNERAL UNDER OBAMA OUR COMMUNIST
WOULD-BE DICTATOR OF AMERICA WHO DOES NOT BELIEVE IN FREEDOM NOR
AMERICA AS A NATION! PASS THIS REPORT ON IF YOU WANT AMERICA TO HAVE
A FUTURE AND YOU STILL OWN YOUR OWN PROPERTY INCLUDING HOUSE, CAR,
MONEY, ETC. ALL OF WHICH OBAMA WANTS FEDERAL OPERATIVES TO STEAL FROM
YOU. SOURCES SUPPLIED ME INFORMATION AND COPIES OF WHAT HE IS UP TO!)
