Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Theater Intelligence and Assessment, Heaven Is About To Render Judgment!

This is posted at www.stevequayle.com.

Greg Evensen is a former Kansas State Trooper. http://www.newswithviews.com/Evensen/gregA.htm

__________________________________________________________________________________



Theater Intelligence and Assessment, Heaven Is About To Render Judgment!



July 18, 2012


Steve:

Within the past few days, I have received information from a retired general who is in a network of "old school" senior officers evaluating the known intelligence concerning a two front combat theater of operations. To keep as much information available to an involved cadre of military and law enforcement agents/agencies, this unofficial, undirected, yet highly qualified working group, have arrived at the conclusion point as I will describe it here.

The overall engagement strategy here is to entice the American military into pledging huge naval assets in the gulf region. The Straits of Hormuz is the "choke point" for all things challenging to Iran. It is here that the Iranian Navy and Air Force will have their greatest chance to inflict REAL damage on our (perversion embracing) armed forces. This is a real point of smack down for the Muslims to bring utter destruction on the American military, the American armed forces, and the American people (infidel society).
The Russians and Chinese do NOT have the immediate design or permission from the Luciferians to openly face the Americans, however; they will be in the command and control loop that manages the combat theater, once operations begin. This entire scheme is part of a feint to also run interference at Diego Garcia, the staging area for material' and air support. Russian, Chinese and North Korean subs are stationed there with surface ship support.
It is clear that events are moving toward an engagement of historic proportions and cataclysmic repercussions on a Biblical scale. The Pentagon is operating on bluster and ineptitude on a staggering scale. Homosexuality has reached the highest levels of the Pentagon as well. The former officers who have seen this coming have disowned many of their complicit former colleagues, while watching in dismay as they move ahead with stupefyingly poor planning surrounding the commitment of at least two and possibly three Naval Carrier Task Force groups now in great harm’s way.
(Steve, I add with emphasis the FEAR of these former officers who despise the surrender to politically correct forces in the White House and ladder-climbers in the Pentagon who have set up our military for an incredibly disastrous defeat because they recognize God will not allow a "victory" by sodomite Generals on the field of battle. Their view and mine). 

The "second" front is America itself. Combat troops from Russia and 14 nations, air assets, armor and artillery, fighter suppression through anti-aircraft batteries on movable platforms that can respond to changing air response grids as well as logistics, hardened communications and transportation hubs, compliment a training contingent that has masqueraded as "friendly forces." The use of some type of advanced accelerant in the massive western fires defies understanding or previous experience by firefighters in that region. "Almost nuclear" in its ability to spread fire and not be quenched by normal fire suppression methods suggests, but cannot yet be confirmed by scientific testing in labs, that intentional human complicity in the fires is virtually certain.
Specific battle plans in war call for the destruction of natural and man-made infrastructure by fire, specifically calling for great monetary, human and technological assets to be used fighting the fires as both a distraction and a planned reduction of the area involved to produce or exist on a "normal" basis.

The potential for "weather wars" or space based atmospheric intervention resulting in a one-two-three punch for the continental U.S. destroying crops, livestock and soil viability, while demoralizing and stressing the electorate remains to "seal the deal" for the take over strategy of America underway since 2001.

Add to all of this the ongoing destruction of the US currency, the pending imposition of the UN Arms Treaty, the 50% per year for five years additional/compounded levels of door to door urban warfare training by US police and military, the published records of firearms suppression training by all levels of police agencies in America, the acquisition of tactical equipment and automatic weapons issuance to street police is unprecedented and overwhelming in its scope and reach. The implication is that these forces are anticipating widespread resistance and engagement with the American citizenry at a point to be determined after the "trip wire" events occur that will "justify" the intervention of such heavily equipped domestic police and military guard units and foreign troops.  
I believe that these brave and dedicated retired experts are doing what they can. They caution that our current Republic is dead. The American people have bought into the lies of the government, the courts, the banks, and the president. They want comforts, government checks, and "hope for more change." Well, let me assure you, the class of "stupid unto death" crowd will get their heart's desire soon enough.

No other conclusion can be drawn. The main event is mere weeks away. Civilian networks are being established to counteract some of this, but one can clearly see that a hugely unprepared, untrained, rudderless society will absorb incredible casualties before even a modest response can be mustered. I have never been more certain that this great "final" plan for the utter destruction of the American nation is poised for implementation as the world's elite serving the Prince of Darkness begins its countdown. God help us to reach more and more for their sake through His mercy.

Steve, these are my descriptions as accurately as I could reproduce them. I apologize that they are a bit "general." but I was receiving it fast in real time and trying to "decode it" figuratively to reproduce it in a way that made some kind of sense to the reader or listener. This is the latest. It may flex a bit before the balloon flies, but we must try to reach people for their soul's sake and for those still trying to plan how to live through this.

We have not taken into account the issues in space, the instability of the sun, and the plotting of "satellite' debris orbiting and potentially targeting earth in front of Nibiru's fly by. Now is the time to complete preparations and system's procurement for home use during this time of utter devastation, but mostly it is a spiritual time of great clarity as events not seen since "the days of Noah" envelope us all.

Thanks, my brother for all that you do. God bless you and continue to use you. Best regards.

Greg Evensen

It’s time to fix what’s broken in America.

“Banksters, politicians, and presidents without birth certificates have decimated over 250 years of prosperity built by our blood, sweat, and tears.

It’s time to fix what’s broken in America.

It’s time to find out who altered Barack Obama’s birth certificate, fire both political parties, and restore the one set of laws which made us the greatest country on Earth – the United States Constitution.

What we heard at this press conference, ladies and gentlemen, I did not expect. Was it shocking?  

It was very unsettling, to the point to where I was shocked.

The reason it is not a mainstream issue is because there’s such a massive cover-up.”

Pete Santilli
U.S. Marine Corps veteran
Former Crime Scene Investigator
July 17, 2012




*******************************************************************************


Published on Jul 17, 2012 by PeterSantilliTV
http://ThePeteSantilliShow.com
Tuesday July 17, 2012 - Los Angeles, Ca - Today on The Pete Santilli Show:

At 5:30pm EST, Maricopa County Sheriff Arpaio revealed the results of his team's investigation into the suspicious circumstances surrounding Barack Obama's legitimacy as President. In the coming days, the main stream media will be forced to cover the facts that potentially expose one of the gravest national security risks in our history.

The investigators conducted a close examination of Hawaii's laws pertaining to registered births. Those laws essentially provide easy access to a Hawaii birth certificate, even if neither parent is a U.S. citizen. A birth certificate is a legal document which provides "proof" that an individual was born in the United States. It automatically grants a person U.S. citizenship. The investigation shows the way in which Hawaii officials currently distribute birth certificates may pose a serious flaw to our national security. Sheriff Arpaio says, "Often investigations into one matter lead law enforcement officials to other issues of serious concern. This Hawaiian law may be a serious threat to national security and needs to be immediately addressed by the U.S. Government."

"My hope is that the U.S. Congress will take over from here if not to further the birth certificate forgery possibility, then at least to examine the state of Hawaii's laws in regards to the issuance of birth certificates which may be permitting untold numbers of foreign born people to wrongly gain U.S. citizenship," Arpaio says.

Be sure to tune in to tomorrow's episode when Pete introduces Susanne Posel as a news correspondent and contributor to the Pete Santilli Show. Susanne will present her finds published in her Agenda 21 and climate science articles on http://OccupyCorporatism.com

The Pete Santilli Show is broadcast LIVE daily at 6pm PST; 9pm EST, and recorded shows can be automatically downloaded on iTunes.  http://www.thepetesantillishow.com/itunes . Please comment below, "like", recommend and subscribe to this channel....it's the most effective way to share this information with as many people as possible, as well as show potential advertisers that people are interested in the topics discussed in the show. Please do your part in the revolution by supporting the show: comment below, "like", recommend and/or subscribe to this episode.
Category:
Tags:

Do you know WHO CONTROLS our government, our banks, our food, our media?

AWAKE to the TRUTH
Do you know WHO CONTROLS our government,
our banks, our food, our media?


Please WATCH

"THRIVE DOCUMENTARY"
http://www.thrivemovement.com/the_movie

Former Navy SEAL Launches PAC To Fight Obama

Former Navy SEAL Launches PAC To Fight Obama
By Hunter Walker 2:01pm

Ryan Zinke in his Navy days. (Photo: IraqVetsForCongress.com)
Today, Ryan Zinke, an ex-Navy SEAL and Montana State Senator, announced the launch of Special Operations for America, a political action committee dedicated to “the election of Mitt Romney and like-minded candidates.”
“Navy SEAL’s, Special Operations Personnel and Veteran’s across America have been outraged since Barack Obama conveniently took credit for killing Osama Bin Laden for political gain,” a statement announcing the loss of SOFA said. “The active duty military has no voice as they are forbidden to publicly engage in the political campaign process and it is career suicide for senior military leaders to speak out against the President.”
Mr. Zinke, who has frequently slammed the president’s handling of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden, reiterated his criticisms of the operation.
“The President has failed and he is jeopardizing the safety of our troops, their families and our National security for political gain. Obama has exposed the identity of special operations units, leaked classified information, and limited the rules of engagement of forces on the ground,” said Mr. Zinke. “For those who have taken an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic, it is a call of duty to take back America from a Commander-in-Chief that is incapable of understanding the sacrifices that have been made for the values that have made America great.”
Mr. Zinke has served in the Montana State Senate since 2009. According to Afghanistan and Iraq Veterans for Congress, a political action committee dedicated to electing Republican vets, Mr. Zinke was a member of SEAL Team Six, the elite unit that killed Bin Laden, from 1990 until 1993 and from 1996 until 1999. He held several titles including Task Force Commander. In 2004, In 2004, was named “Deputy and acting Commander, Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force-Arabian Peninsula in support of Operation IRAQI FREEDOM” in that capacity he “led a force of over 3500 Special Operations personnel in Iraq in the conduct of 360 combat patrols, 48 Direct Action missions, and hundreds of sensitive operations” and “was responsible for killing or capturing 72 known enemy insurgents and terrorists.”

Producer of Jurassic Park, Brave Heart reeases new Movie , 2016 Must See Trailer!!

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Producer of Jurassic Park, Brave Heart reeases new Movie , 2016 Must See Trailer!!
Posted By: Susoni [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 18-Jul-2012 12:30:40

A Reader sent this in for us to see !
An extremely important movie is coming this summer - - It is called simply "2016".
The speaker here is Dinesh D'Souza, college president in New York and author of many New York Times best sellers. The movie is from Gerald R. Molen, producer of Academy Award winning Schindler's List, Jurassic Park, Brave Heart.
It explains in plain language who Barack Obama really is, what he stands for, and the dangers of him being re-elected for another four years.
Watch this short informative video preview of this movie (which came out only yesterday) and share it with others. The preview has already been seen by over 18,000 people. Within a very short time it will have been seen by millions! After you see the preview, listen to what Dinesh has to say about Obama. Please take the time to hear this and pass it on.
http://www.youtube.com/v/Z6QOscKvUjU?version=3&feature=player_detailpage

Congress Won’t Act on Arpaio’s Call for Investigation of National Security Threat; Should the Military?

Congress Won’t Act on Arpaio’s Call for Investigation of National Security Threat; Should the Military?

Congress Won’t Act on Arpaio’s Call for Investigation of National Security Threat; Should the Military?

posted on by Tad Cronn


06252012BrewerObama

Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz., and lead Cold Case Posse investigator Mike Zullo set out last year to prove President Obama was born in Hawaii and that all the rumors about his birth certificate were unfounded.

After nine months of investigation, they’ve come to the opposite conclusion, that the birth certificate and other documents relating to the president’s past are forgeries and that there has been a massive coverup, although they have not directly accused Obama of knowledge of or participation in any such criminal acts.

What Arpaio and Zullo did say at a press conference Tuesday is that the latest information they’ve uncovered reveals a serious national security threat and shores up the case for fraud in the tale of Obama’s Hawaiian birth.

During the press conference, Zullo related how his team of investigators found and interviewed the person who actually would have signed Obama’s birth certificate, and she offered information that solidifies the case that the document released by the White House was tampered with.
 
Specifically, some boxes that are filled in on the certificate are marked with a handwritten numeric code, 9, meaning no information was provided and the boxes should have been left blank. Also, the clerk who signed Obama’s birth certificate, Verna Lee, indicated that Obama’s birth certificate was out of sequence if he had been born at Kapioloni Hospital as claimed.

But what led investigators to conclude that there is an imminent national security threat is the discovery that Hawaii’s law has a flaw in it such that any foreigner can obtain a Hawaiian birth certificate just by showing he has resided in Hawaii. The information presents Arpaio with a quandary.

“Although I am having a difficult time deciding who to forward this information to given the fact that the obvious choices report directly to the president, I cannot stand by and hold on to information that threatens to weaken national security,” Arpaio said.
(Or as the future Commissioner Gordon said in the first Batman movie with Christian Bale, “In a town this bent, who is there to report to?”)

Although Arpaio called for Congress — “someone” — to investigate this situation, he’s right that no one under Obama will lift a finger, for two reasons: one, Obama ordered Homeland Security to ignore Arizona law enforcement in revenge for the state’s immigration policy being upheld by the Supreme Court; and two, Obama clearly intends to weaken U.S. borders by using his executive order to grant amnesty to young illegal aliens and by closing Border Patrol stations in Republican states.

Since Congress has allowed Obama to get away with making himself a de facto king by going around Congress and declaring amnesty by his own, sole authority, there is no reason to think Congress would act on Arpaio’s new information.

So this raises a question, and it’s a scary question to have to ask:
Is it time for the military to step in and stop Obama and our other elected leaders from weakening our national security?

The Oath of Office taken by officers of the uniformed services upon commissioning states:
I, [name], do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.
This oath is recognized as requiring officers of the military to refuse to obey unconstitutional orders. Should it be construed as requiring them to step in when both the Executive and Legislative Branches appear to be colluding to weaken our national defense?

Drake Mid-Week Update

Drake Mid-Week Update

 Wednesday - July 18, 2012

by Global Voice 2012 Radio


Call in to speak with the host
(646) 716-4984

6pm CENTRAL - 7pm EST
4 pm PST

Home of DRAKE.  Tonight Drake will be giving mid-week updates concerning our freedom.

Thank the Boy Scouts of America for their stand



American Family Association   Take Action Now



Thank the Boy Scouts of America for their stand

Send your email directly to the National Council office now!
July 18, 2012

Yesterday, the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) reaffirmed its longstanding policy of protecting youth by not allowing homosexuals to serve as volunteer leaders.
According to OneNewsNow, an 11-member special committee, formed discretely by top Scout leaders in 2010, "came to the conclusion that this policy is absolutely the best policy for the Boy Scouts," the organization's national spokesman, Deron Smith, told The Associated Press.
The Boy Scouts have been bullied relentlessly by homosexual activist groups since 2000, when the Supreme Court ruled the organization could set its own rules regarding leadership.
The Boy Scout Oath
"On my honor, I will do my best To do my duty to God and my country and to obey the Scout Law; To help other people at all times; To keep myself physically strong, mentally awake and morally straight."
This week, homosexual activists say they will deliver a petition to BSA headquarters in Irving, Texas, condemning the Boy Scouts for Youth Protection Training policies specifically designed to protect young boys from men who are sexually attracted to males.
I think we can top that! Will you join me by letting the BSA know you support them? And...by forwarding this to your family and friends and encouraging them to take action too!
TAKE ACTION
Send your letter of support directly to the Boy Scouts of America national office now! Let the BSA know you agree with their policy of keeping "morally straight."

Take Action Now
Send your letter of support to the Boy Scouts of America now!

It is very important that you forward this alert to your friends and family members.
Sincerely,

Tim

Tim Wildmon, President
American Family Association

P.S. Follow @AFAActionAlert on Twitter.



American Family Association | P O Drawer 2440 | Tupelo, MS 38803 | 1-662-844-5036
Copyright © 2011 American Family Association. All Rights Reserved


.

Titanic or Gethsemane - 6 months

Subject: Titanic or Gethsemane
Sent: Tue, Jul 17, 2012 11:58:53 PM
Titanic or Gethsemane
Chuck Witzel
7-9-12
At our Monday Night Intercession The Holy Spirit gave me two sentences:

     A. The spirit of the *Titanic
     B. The Spirit of *Gethsemane
I felt I had a general understanding of the two and went to bed... the Holy Spirit got me up because He had wanted me to have the correct understanding.

This is what I He gave me:

Father is giving his children 6 months to get off the Titanic... it will be sinking soon. He has a lifeboat for each person who has a desire to know His plan for them.
This plan will be found in Gethsemane... a place of complete surrender to Fathers will for our lives. Some have already been to the garden of Gethsemane, have surrendered and are getting a heavenly download of Fathers plans.
Others have not made that decision. They are holding unto the rails of the Titanic not wanting to give up their will to follow the Master into their destiny. That ship will sink because there is an iceberg directly in its path.
Father is giving us time before the cost of disobedience goes way up.
For those that choose Gethsemane, it can be 6 months of intimate time with Father. A time of acquiring resources, wisdom and direction our our destinies.  There are new people that Father wants to bring into our lives necessary for the fulfillment of our destiny; there may be people in our lives that will hinder this process that we must give up.
If you choose Gethsemane, pray daily for divine appointments. Your life may ( almost guaranteed ) go through radical changes. Do not hold unto anything that Father says must go. Whatever we hang unto that Father wants out of our lives will become an anchor that will hold us back or pull us under.
This may be the most serious time in our life because of the tremendous danger ahead. There is no time to wait. There is much to do to prepare for what is coming.
If you wait until the Titanic hits the iceberg you may survive but will lose much.
In Gethsemane Jesus made a decision to obey the will of His Father even unto death. That decision ultimately produced life and so will our decision.
2013 will be an awesome year for those who obey and very challenging for those for the disobedient.
Father will do everything He can to encourage us to get off the Titanic and into the lifeboat He has personally prepared for each of us.
If you choose to disobey you will look back at this 6 month period with great regret.
This time period is a time to pick up the spoils we will need for the coming season.

I encourage you to pray over this word and obey everything the Holy Spirit shows you
Titanic – The greatest ship built up to that time... thought to be unsinkable so they do not outfit it that possibility... not enough life boats... etc... In their Pride they were not prepared for disaster.
This represents our own personal Pride that causes us to think we can manage our lives and future without God.
Gethsemane – Mark 14:32-42
Celebration Ministries
Chuck & Karen Witzel
cwitzel558@aol.com


THE CONSTITUTION, VATTEL, AND "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN"


This is a wonderful piece and should be saved to send to the idiots who have no clue.
I recommend this (http://www.newswithviews.com) article -- Publius Huldah -- The Constitution, Vattel, and "Natural Born Citizen". You should check this out at, http://www.newswithviews.com/Publius/huldah110.htm
THE CONSTITUTION, VATTEL, AND "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN"

By Publius Huldah
July 18, 2012
NewsWithViews.com

We have been visited recently with several very silly articles which assert that Marco Rubio is a “natural born Citizen” within the meaning of Art. II, §1, cl. 5, U.S. Constitution (ratified 1789), and hence is qualified to be President:
Bret Baier (Fox News) asserts that Congress can define (and presumably redefine, from time to time) terms in the Constitution by means of law.
Chet Arthur in American Thinker quips that “the original meaning of ‘natural born citizen’” is determined by reference to “The Heritage Guide to the Constitution” and to the definition of “citizen” at Sec. 1 of the 14th Amendment, ratified 1868.
Human Events claims that anyone born within The United States is a “natural born citizen” eligible to be President.
Jake Walker at Red State purports to show how the term has been used from 1795 to the present. After quoting James Madison on the citizenship requirements imposed by Art. I, §2, cl. 2, to be a member of the House, Walker gleefully quotes a 1795 discussion of “natural born subject” to “prove” that anyone born here is a “natural born citizen”:
“It is an established maxim, received by all political writers, that every person owes a natural allegiance to the government of that country in which he is born. Allegiance is defined to be a tie, that binds the subject to the state, and in consequence of his obedience, he is entitled to protection…” [emphasis mine]
“The children of aliens, born in this state, are considered as natural born subjects, and have the same rights with the rest of the citizens.” [emphasis mine]
But “subjects” are not “citizens”; and we fought a war so that we could be transformed from “subjects of the British Crown” to Citizens of a Republic!
The four writers don’t know what they are talking about. But I will tell you the Truth and prove it. We first address Word Definitions.
Word Definitions:
Like clouds, word meanings change throughout time. “Awful” once meant “full of wonder and reverence”; “cute” meant “bowlegged”; “gay” meant “jovial”; and “nice” meant “precise”. Accordingly, if someone from an earlier time wrote of a “cute gay man”, he was not referring to an adorable homosexual, but to a cheerful bowlegged man.
So! In order to understand the genuine meaning of a text, we must use the definitions the authors used when they wrote it. Otherwise, written texts become as shifting and impermanent as the clouds – blown hither and yon throughout the years by those who unthinkingly read in their own uninformed understandings, or deliberately pervert the text to further their own agenda.
So! Is Our Constitution built on the Rock of Fixed Definitions – those our Framers used? Or are its Words mere clouds to be blown about by Acts of Congress, whims of federal judges, and the idiotic notions of every ignoramus who writes about it?
What Did Our Framers mean by “natural born Citizen”?
Article II, §1, cl. 5, U.S. Constitution, requires the President to be a “natural born Citizen”.
The meaning of this term is not set forth in The Constitution or in The Federalist Papers; and I found no discussion of the meaning in Madison’s Journal of the Federal Convention or in Alexander Hamilton’s notes of the same.
What does this tell us? That they all knew what it meant. We don’t go around defining “pizza,” because every American over the age of four knows what a pizza is.
Our Framers had no need to define “natural born Citizen” in the Constitution, because by the time of the Federal Convention of 1787, a formal definition of the term consistent with the new republican principles[1] already existed in Emer Vattel’s classic, Law of Nations.
And we know that our Framers carefully studied and relied upon Vattel’s work. I’ll prove it.
How Vattel’s Law of Nations got to the Colonies, and its Influence Here:
During 1775, Charles Dumas, an ardent republican [as opposed to a monarchist] living in Europe sent three copies of Vattel’s Law of Nations to Benjamin Franklin. Here is a portion of Franklin’s letter of Dec. 9, 1775 thanking Dumas for the books:
“… I am much obliged by the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel. It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the law of nations. Accordingly that copy, which I kept, (after depositing one in our own public library here, and sending the other to the College of Massachusetts Bay, as you directed,) has been continually in the hands of the members of our Congress, now sitting, who are much pleased with your notes and preface, and have entertained a high and just esteem for their author…” (2nd para) [boldface added]
Vattel’s Law of Nations was thereafter “pounced upon by studious members of Congress, groping their way without the light of precedents.”
Years later, Albert de Lapradelle wrote an introduction to the 1916 ed. of Law of Nations published by the Carnegie Endowment.[2] Lapradelle said the fathers of independence “were in accord with the ideas of Vattel”; they found in Vattel “all their maxims of political liberty”; and:
“From 1776 to 1783, the more the United States progressed, the greater became Vattel’s influence. In 1780 his Law of Nations was a classic, a text book in the universities.” (page xxx) [emphasis added]
In footnote 1 on the same page (xxx), Lapradelle writes:
“… Another copy was presented by Franklin to the Library Company of Philadelphia. Among the records of its Directors is the following minute: "Oct. 10, 1775. Monsieur Dumas having presented the Library with a very late edition of Vattel's Law of Nature and Nations (in French), the Board direct the secretary to return that gentle-man their thanks." This copy undoubtedly was used by the members of the Second Continental Congress, which sat in Philadelphia; by the leading men who directed the policy of the United Colonies until the end of the war; and, later, by the men who sat in the Convention of 1787 and drew up the Constitution of the United States, for the library was located in Carpenters' Hall, where the First Congress deliberated, and within a stone's throw of the Colonial State House of Pennsylvania, where the Second Congress met, and likewise near where the Constitution was framed …” [emphasis added]
So! Vattel’s work was “continually in the hands” of Congress in 1775; Members of the Continental Congress “pounced” on Vattel’s work; our Founders used the republican Principles in Vattel’s work to justify our Revolution against a monarchy; by 1780, Vattel’s work was a “classic” taught in our universities; and our Framers used it at the Federal Convention of 1787.[3]
Vattel on “natural born citizens,” “inhabitants,” and “naturalized citizens.”
From our beginning, we were subjects of the British Crown. With the War for Independence, we became citizens.[1] [READ this footnote!] We needed new concepts to fit our new status as citizens. Vattel provided these new republican concepts of “citizenship”. The gist of what Vattel says in Law of Nations, Book I, Ch. XIX, at §§ 212-217, is this:
§ 212: Natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens - it is necessary that they be born of a father who is a citizen. If a person is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.
§ 213: Inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners who are permitted to stay in the country. They are subject to the laws of the country while they reside in it. But they do not participate in all the rights of citizens - they enjoy only the advantages which the law or custom gives them. Their children follow the condition of their fathers – they too are inhabitants.
§ 214: A country may grant to a foreigner the quality of citizen - this is naturalization. In some countries, the sovereign cannot grant to a foreigner all the rights of citizens, such as that of holding public office - this is a regulation of the fundamental law. And in England, merely being born in the country naturalizes the children of a foreigner.
§§ 215, 216 & 217: Children born of citizens in a foreign country, at sea, or while overseas in the service of their country, are “citizens.” By the law of nature alone, children follow the condition of their fathers; the place of birth produces no change in this particular.
Do you see? The republican concept of “natural born citizenship” is radically different from the feudal notion of “natural born subjectship.” Under feudalism, merely being born in the domains of the King made one – by birth – a “natural born subject”. But in Vattel’s Model and Our Constitutional Republic, Citizens are “natural born” only if they are born of Citizens.
How Our Framers applied Vattel’s Concept of “natural born citizen” in Our Constitution:
The Federal Convention was in session from May 14, through September 17, 1787. John Jay, who had been a member of the Continental Congress [where they “pounced” on Vattel], sent this letter of July 25, 1787, to George Washington, who presided over the Convention:
"…Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government and to declare expressly that the Command in Chief of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen..."[4]
According, Art. II, §1, cl. 5 was drafted to read:
“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” [boldface added]
In § 214, Vattel states that “fundamental law” may withhold from naturalized citizens some of the rights of citizens, such as holding public office. The Constitution is our “fundamental law”; and, following Vattel, Art. II, §1, cl. 5 withholds from naturalized citizens (except for our Founding Generation which was “grandfathered in”) the right to hold the office of President.[5]
Remember! None of our early Presidents were “natural born Citizens”, even though they were all born here. They were all born as subjects of the British Crown. They became naturalized citizens with the Declaration of Independence. That is why it was necessary to provide a grandfather clause for them. But after our Founding Generation was gone, their successors were required to be born as citizens of the United States - not merely born here (as were our Founders), but born as citizens.
And do not forget that the children born here of slaves did not become “citizens” by virtue of being born here. Their parents were slaves; hence (succeeding to the condition of their parents) they were born as slaves. Black people born here did not become citizens until 1868 and the ratification of the 14th Amendment.
So! Do you see? If Our Framers understood that merely being born here were sufficient to confer status as a “natural born citizen”; it would not have been necessary to grandfather in our first generation of Presidents; and all the slaves born here would have been “natural born citizens”. But they were born as non-citizen slaves, because their parents were non-citizen slaves.
David Ramsay’s 1789 Dissertation on Citizenship
David Ramsay was an historian, Founding Father, and member of the Continental Congress [REMEMBER: This is where they “pounced” on Vattel], whose Dissertation On The Manner Of Acquiring The Character And Privileges Of A Citizen Of The United States was published in 1789, just after ratification of our Constitution and the Year the new Government began.
It is an interesting dissertation and only 8 pages long. At the bottom of his page 6, Ramsay states:
“The citizenship of no man could be previous to the declaration of independence, and, as a natural right, belongs to none but those who have been born of citizens since the 4th of July, 1776.” [modernized spelling & emphasis are mine]
Do you see? Ramsay’s Dissertation sets forth the understanding of the Time, formally stated by Vattel and incorporated by our Framers, that a “natural born Citizen” is one who is born of citizens. And we had no “citizens” until July 4, 1776.
Now, let us look at the First Congress.
How the First Congress followed Vattel and our Framers:
Article I, §8, cl. 4 delegates to Congress the power “To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization”.[6] Pursuant to that power, the First Congress passed the Naturalization Act of 1790. Here is the text, which you can find at 1 Stat. at Large, 103:
“SECTION1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That any alien, being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof, on application to any common law court of record, in any one of the states wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such court, that he is a person of good character, and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by law, to support the constitution of the United States, which oath or affirmation such court shall administer; and the clerk of such court shall record such application, and the proceedings thereon; and thereupon such person shall be considered as a citizen of the United States. And the children of such persons so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty-one years at the time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States … APPROVED, March 26, 1790.”[7]
So! This Act of the First Congress implements the Principles set forth in Vattel, embraced by our Framers, and enshrined in Art. II, §1, cl. 5, that:
A “natural born Citizen” is one who is born of parents who are citizens.
Minor children born here of aliens do not become citizens until their parents are naturalized. Thus, they are not “natural born” citizens.

Our Framers rejected the anti-republican and feudal notion that mere location of birth within a Country naturalizes the children of a foreigner.[8]
The distinction written into Our Constitution and implemented by the Naturalization Act of 1790 is between someone who is born a citizen, by being born of parents who are already Citizens, and someone who becomes a citizen after birth by naturalization. Only the former are eligible to be President.
So! Original Intent? Or Whatever the People with the Power want it to Mean?
I have proved the original intent of “natural born Citizen” at Art. II, §1, cl. 5 – it is one who is born of parents who are citizens. We may not lawfully change that definition except by Amendment to the Constitution. Section 1 of the 14th Amendment does not change the definition because the 14th Amendment defines “citizens” of the United States (which includes naturalized citizens) and not “natural born Citizen.”
Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!
Enter Your E-Mail Address:
Some Democrats no longer pretend that the glib, handsome & black Obama (who, following the condition of his putative father, was born a subject of the British Crown) is “a natural born Citizen”. They now assert that the Democrat Party has the right to nominate whoever they choose to run for president, including someone who is not qualified for the office. [See pages 3 & 4 of the linked Court Order.]
The school-girlish Establishment Republicans who swoon over the glib, handsome & Hispanic Marco Rubio (who is not a “natural born Citizen”, but only a naturalized citizen) will ultimately destroy our sovereignity. Once we accept that our President need not be a “natural born Citizen”, we will have made a major step towards submission to global government. Because then, anybody can be President.
© 2012 Publius Huldah - All Rights Reserved
Footnotes:
1. Monarchies have subjects. Republics are formed by citizens. We broke from a monarchy under which we were subjects; and with our War for Independence, were transformed into citizens!
The common law of England recognizes only subjects of the Crown. England has never had citizens. Her feudal doctrine of “natural born subjects” is set forth in Book I, Ch. 10, of Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England (I modernized the spelling):
“THE first and most obvious division of the people is into aliens and natural-born subjects. Natural-born subjects are such as are born within the dominions of the crown of England, that is, within the … allegiance of the king; and aliens, such as are born out of it. Allegiance is the tie … which binds the subject to the king …” [emphasis mine]
Under feudalism, people are possessions who belong to the Land in which they were born. So they are “naturally” subject to whoever owns the Land. They were born as subjects to the owner of the land [ultimately, the King] on which they were born.
With our War for Independence, We repudiated the notion of natural born subjects. As Citizens, We ordained and established Our Constitution wherein We created a federal government which was subject to us!
Jake Walker doesn’t seem to know the difference between being “a subject of a King” and “a citizen of a Republic”, as he equates the feudal concept of “natural born subject” with the Republican concept of “natural born Citizen”.
Chet Arthur and Human Events tell us the “original intent” of “natural born Citizen” at Art. II, §1, cl. 5 is given by an Amendment defining “citizen” [not “natural born citizen”] ratified 80 years later!
And Bret Baier seems unaware that the methods for amending the Constitution are set forth in Article V; and that Congress may not amend the Constitution by making a law which redefines terms set forth in the Constitution!
These four amateurs would do well to study Birthright Citizenship and Dual Citizenship: Harbingers of Administrative Tyranny, by Professor Edward J. Erler. Erler addresses the distinctions between “citizenship” and “subjectship”; and the concept of “citizenship” at §1 of the 14th Amendment. He proves that not everyone born here is a “citizen”: Only those whose parents are “subject to the jurisdiction of the US” are citizens. Illegal aliens are not “subject to the jurisdiction of the US” – they are invaders whose allegiance is to the Country they left. Foreign diplomats stationed here are not “subject to the jurisdiction of the US”. Thus, children born here of these aliens are not citizens!
2. The 1916 ed. of Law of Nations with Lapradelle’s introduction is a Google digitized book. If you download it, you get an easily readable text.
3. Many thanks to my friend, David J. Edwards, who provided me with Evidence of Vattel’s profound influence on our Founders & Framers.
4. The hyperlink contains another link where you can see Jay’s handwritten letter!
5. Note that Art. I, §2, cl. 2, permits naturalized citizens to serve as Representatives; and Art. I, §3, cl. 3, permits them to serve as Senators.
6. “Naturalization” is the process, established by law, by which foreigners become citizens.
7. Note that in §§ 215, 216 & 217, Vattel says that children born of citizens in a foreign country, at sea, or while overseas in the service of their country, are “citizens”. He goes on to say that by the law of nature alone, children follow the condition of their fathers; the place of birth produces no change in this particular. But he doesn’t expressly say they are “natural born citizens”. The italicized words at the end of the 1790 Act correct that and make it clear that children of citizens of the United States are “natural born citizens” wherever they are born.
8. The 14th Amendment doesn’t change this one whit! READ Prof. Erler’s paper, linked above.

NOTICE! To all who strain to find something I “failed to mention”: I didn’t quote Minor v. Happersett because Minor merely paraphrases, in dicta, a portion of the Naturalization Act of 1790, the text of which is set forth above.
And I didn’t show why John McCain & Mitt Romney ARE natural born Citizens; and why Marco Rubio & Obama are NOT natural born Citizens. J.B. Williams has already done an excellent job in applying the Republican Principles set forth by Vattel, and which were embraced by our Founders, Framers, and the First Congress, in his recent paper, Romney, Rubio, McCain And Natural Born Citizen.
Share This Article
Click Here For Mass E-mailing


Publius Huldah is a retired attorney who now lives in Tennessee. Before getting a law degree, she got a degree in philosophy where she specialized in political philosophy and epistemology (theories of knowledge). She now writes extensively on the U.S. Constitution, using the Federalist Papers to prove its original meaning and intent. She also shows how federal judges and politicians have ignored Our Constitution and replaced it with their personal opinions and beliefs.h
E-Mail: publiushuldah@gmail.com


‘Nonsense’: Muslim Rep. Keith Ellison

‘Nonsense’: Muslim Rep. Keith Ellison Slams Assertion that Islamic Extremists Have Infiltrated the U.S. Government

  • Posted on July 18, 2012 at 10:35am by Erica RitzErica Ritz 


Keith Ellison Tells Anderson Cooper Evidence of Muslim Brotherhood, Islamic Extremists in U.S. Government is Not True, Nothing
On June 13th, Michele Bachmann (R-MN), Trent Franks (R-AZ), Louie Gohmert (R-TX), Tom Rooney (FL-16) and Lynn Westmoreland (R-GA) sent official letters to the Inspectors General of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, and the Department of State with the intention of determining the level of infiltration by Islamic extremist groups within their respective organizations.

(Related: GBTV‘s ’Rumors of War III’ Examines Strategic Islamist Penetration of U.S. at The Highest Level)
Focusing on the Muslim Brotherhood, each letter roughly began:
As you may know, information has recently come to light that raises serious questions about the involvement of organizations and individuals associated with the Muslim Brotherhood in [insert department] activities and policies. Given that the U.S. government has established in federal court that the Muslim Brotherhood’s mission in the United States is “destroying Western civilization from within” — a practice the Brothers call “civilization jihad” — we believe that the apparent involvement of those with such ties raises serious security concerns that warrant your urgent attention.
 
The letters then pointed to specific areas of concern within the respective departments. You can read a copy of them via Michele Bachmann’s website, here.
Keith Ellison Tells Anderson Cooper Evidence of Muslim Brotherhood, Islamic Extremists in U.S. Government is Not True, Nothing
(Photo: CNN)
But now, Democratic congressman Keith Ellison is calling the assertions and provided proof “regurgitated nonsense” and “repeated, false allegations.”

On CNN with Anderson Cooper, Cooper began the segment by explaining that Ellison is leading the charge in demanding proof of the claims. Ellison reportedly got a 16-page letter back but, rather than discuss why the charges were “nothing,” Ellison simply resorted to belittling them and the members of congress who provided them.
“16 pages doesn’t take nothing and turn it into something, it’s still nothing, and the fact is, I would hope that we would let our saner, more courageous spirit prevail.”

Anderson Cooper then asked whether there was any evidence of “deep penetration” by the Muslim Brotherhood, careful to note for the second time that the phrase was Michele Bachmann’s.

“No. It’s not true. It doesn’t exist. It’s a phantom,” Ellison responded, without providing any substantiating information of his own, or refuting any of the evidence before him.

He added: “Let me also assert that if there is any source of threat to the United States, legitimate, you know, that I want it to be investigated at whatever source. I don’t care what religion, what race, what, whoever they are. If they are a legitimate threat to the U.S., by all means investigate them…”

He did not specify at what point a threat becomes worthy of investigation.
Watch the entire clip, below:

The pair then proceeded to discuss Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff, who reportedly has numerous connections to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Anderson Cooper phrased it: “Basically, they‘re saying that Huma Abedin’s dead father headed a group decades ago, and one of the people who supposedly supported that group headed another group that was supposedly connected to the Muslim Brotherhood…Does that make any sense to you, that she shouldn’t have gotten a security clearance, because of that?”
Though no one is claiming Huma Abedin is an extremist, Cooper did phrase the question in misleading terms. In reality, the members of Congress said that Abedin has three family members — her late father, her mother, and her brother– who are connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations. Because “her position affords her routine access to the Secretary and to policy-making,” in the words of the congressional letter, these immediate connections should be evaluated and either dismissed, or considered.

Ellison concluded: “…It‘s about some people in our country thinking that if you’re not in the quote unquote ‘mainstream,’ then you have no place– that you have to be a certain color, a certain race, a certain sexual orientation, a certain religion, and if you‘re not the ’right’ ones, then you’re not okay. But we’ve got to stand up for this idea that we all count in this America, and [an] American is [an] American is [an] American, and we’re going to stick with this idea; we’re not going to back down.”

Click here to read Bachmann’s 16-page letter of “nonsense,” in the words of Keith Ellison, highlighting possible security risks.

Private Investigator Susan Daniels: "The American people should be scared"

Peter Boyles covers the Arpaio press conference - July 18 morning show on KHOW Denver

__________________________________________________________________________

Private Investigator Susan Daniels, who discovered Barack Obama’s fraudulent Social Security number, is interviewed at 24:30 in the 7:00 AM segment:

Obama could not have obtained his Social Security number legally. An SS number is the foundation for a false identity.

I believe Obama had a previous SSN, and they needed to get rid of it to hide his past. It could have been a foreign student number, it could have been anything.

His sister has a Hawaiian SSN. Obama’s number was issued in Connecticut while he was a teen-ager living in Hawaii.

I have no clue who he is. I have no clue where he got the number. I am still working on trying to identify the person who originally had the number.

There is no reason for somebody to have a number like he has. The only reason is to hide something.
That should scare people greatly in the country.”

Susan Daniels
Licensed Ohio Private Investigator
July 18, 2012

***************************************************************


Excellent interviews of Jack Cashill, Sheriff Arpaio, Susan Daniels, Tom Ballantyne (author of “Really O’Reilly?”) and Mike Zullo by Peter Boyles this morning on KHOW Denver:


6 AM:




7 AM:





8 AM: