By James Smith
17 October 2012
http://www.prepperpodcast.com/govt-nazi-scientists-bankers-similarities-frightening/#axzz29X8Grh3E
"But the most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no
success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly and with
unflagging attention. It must confine itself to a few points and repeat them
over and over. Here, as so often in this world, persistence is the first and
most important requirement for success." – Adolph Hitler
During the 1930’s and 40’s, NAZI scientists propagated the concept that Jews
were “subhuman” or in the Teutonic, “
untermensch”. In part, the
idea was to so demonize one race of people to the point that killing them was a
duty, a simple fact of life like killing a fly. Mao Tse-tung once issued
an order to all Chinese to
kill any pest that
they see.
And Hitler was no different. By classifying Jews, Romani, gays, and the
handicapped as being “inferior people”, it allowed the German people to kill
them with impunity. Even after being told that to eject Jewish scientist would
set back the German civilization 100 years, Hitler was quoted as
saying,
“Our national policies will not be revoked or modified, even for
scientists. If the dismissal of Jewish scientists means the annihilation of
contemporary German science, then we shall do without science for a few years.”
Gratefully, history closed the book of the Third Reich with a resounding
slam and threw them into the fire to stop the poison.
But someone fished the book out of the fire, dusted it off and recasted the
players.
The Third Reich is now the Green Movement, and the role of Jews and the
Untermenschen are now being played by independent thinkers and adherents to
true scientific integrity.
Global Warming, for those not paying attention, is sometimes called “Climate
Change”, the concept that mankind is responsible for the warming of the earth
which causes extreme weather events. Sometimes called “Anthromorphic Climate
Change” – it all boils down to mankind and businesses are killing the earth. If
you aren’t a Global Warming believer, you are a heretic. And heretics in this
day and age must pay dearly.
In 2007, the blog,
WKU
Meterology was quoted as saying:
“For a more sinister motive, there are some who say that the Weather
Channel has become more political recently in their views towards Global
Warming and are subtly trying to influence the viewing public (who generally
are not knowledgeable about historical climatology) into thinking that certain
weather events are rare (or increasing or getting worse, etc.) when they are
really not. This in turn implies that the frequency of many weather events are
changing, which implies Global Warming is behind all the “weird weather” we
have been having recently. In reality, even the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) states that “Recent analyses of changes in severe local
weather (tornadoes, thunder days, lightning and hail) in a few selected regions
provide no compelling evidence for widespread systematic long-term changes.”
In November of 2008, Weather Channel personality Heidi Cullen
stated:
“If a meteorologist has an AMS Seal of Approval, which is used to confer
legitimacy to TV meteorologists, then meteorologists have a responsibility to
truly educate themselves on the science of global warming.” “Meteorologists are
among the few people trained in the sciences who are permitted regular access
to our living rooms. And in that sense, they owe it to their audience to
distinguish between solid, peer-reviewed science and junk political
controversy.” “If a meteorologist can’t speak to the
fundamental science of climate change, then maybe the AMS shouldn’t give them a
Seal of Approval.”
And
earlier this month , the United States Secretary of the Interior Ken
Salazar has announced new funding of more than $10 million tax payer dollars to
be awarded by Interior's regional Climate Science Centers to “… universities or
other partners for research to guide managers of parks, refuges and other
resources in planning how to help species and ecosystems adapt to climate
change.” And further in the article, “
The 69
studies at eight climate science centers focus on how climate change will
affect natural resources. For example, various projects identify how sea-level
rise will affect coastal resources, how climate will affect vegetation, how
these changes will affect valued species such as sage grouse, and how changes
in water availability will affect both people and ecosystems—and ecosystem
services such as fisheries. Several studies address the potential effects on
resources of concern to Native Americans, some by using traditional ecological
knowledge to advance adaptation planning”
Despite an
article
in the Wall Street Journal in January of this year, signed by sixteen
scientists that all state the following,
“There is no compelling scientific
argument for drastic action to "decarbonize" the world's economy.”
By throwing money at an imaginary problem, the White House can tell
Environmental constituents
, “We tried to end global warming, but the other
guys stopped us” – further enlarging the divide between two diverse groups
of thought.
And earlier this week,
a report was issued that global warming stopped 16 years ago. However, only
five years ago former Vice President Al Gore was awarded the
Nobel Peace
Prize for his work in stopping global warming. In his M
agnus opus,
“An Inconvenient Truth” Gore uses invalid data to produce this chart:
http://www.prepperpodcast.com/govt-nazi-scientists-bankers-similarities-frightening/#axzz29X8Grh3E
