|
My Shocking Interview With Cancer Patient |
||
|
|
||
|
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
My Shocking Interview With Cancer Patient
Reader: We are not advocating anti- government anything. We advocate responsible and accountable government!!
Reader: We are not advocating anti- government anything.
We advocate responsible and accountable government!!
In Response To: Anti-government
freemen movement creating ‘major policing problem’: report (Maryhrt)
|
*******************************************************
******************************* Re: Anti-government freemen movement creating .... This article is full of misconceptions and really poor reporting. <<< An anti-government movement known as Freeman on the Land has become a “major policing problem” in several provinces, according to a threat assessment by Canada’s spy officials. >>> We are not advocating anti- government anything. We advocate responsible and accountable government. We all realize that there must be trustees to care for certain aspects of community living and support fully those that chose to serve with truth, honesty, honor and love. We have come to learn that no-one MUST be represented, and therefore chose to present ourselves, living flesh, sons (generic) of God and the original creditors. Of course the folks that profit from subversion and lies don't like this much. << I have served the WFS for over 3 years as Chief Administrative Officer for Canada chapter and have followed our members closely for some time. To my knowledge, there are NO far right racists in our membership. Our members recognize the oneness of life and know to treat others with honor and fairness, regardless of their roots. We do have a public forum where some issues such as these are brought forth, but they are brought forth by the public, not typically our members. As mentioned above, we advocate truth and honor. If that makes us domestic extremists, then domestic extremists are sorely needed to counterbalance the "good citizen Representative" that bases their public dealings on lies and deception. <<< Its adherents fall on both the left and right wings of the political spectrum, but “at the core” of the movement is the belief that “government operates outside of its legal jurisdiction and therefore Freeman members do not recognize the authority of national, provincial, or municipal laws, policies or regulations,” says the report, titled Canada: Biannual Update on Terrorist and Extremist†Threats, which was prepared in April and released under federal access-to-information laws >>> This is fundamentally correct, however it is far from complete. The Government's own websites and information states quite clearly that the Government of Canada is simply de-facto in origin. They, themselves state that they are an unlawful government. Add tot hat the fact that Queen Victoria, prior to her death signed a declaration removing ALL British claim to Canada... A fact that has very far reaching ramifications. <<< “Freeman members now constitute a major policing problem in several provinces and have occasionally engaged in acts of violence against the police,” the report states. >>> Yes we can be a bit of a problem for Police, especially when they overstep their mandate, abandon their oath of Peace Officer and attempt to apply statute without securing jurisdiction first. As for getting violent? We WILL NOT instigate violence, but I cannot say that some of our members will not answer violence with violence against policy enforcement that that fails in it's duty to due diligence and honor. A note to the LEO's out there... Honor your oath as Peace Officer and honor truth and justice overall and we will get along just fine... and your job will get a lot more rewarding as well. That is a start to the misconceptions and lies in this article. There are far too much here to answer in this email. If any have any questions, seek out our public forum, come in and ask. Be aware that it is a public forum and you will get answers from all over the map. Best to ask the person if they are a member of the society or just the forum. My thanks to all. Namaste' John. |
Anti-government freemen movement creating ‘major policing problem’: report
Anti-government freemen movement creating ‘major policing
problem’: report
|
Yep! The British Crown is becoming worried,
the sheople are no longer willing to be herded. There are only 25 million people in Canada and most Canadians have been disarmed. If they cannot control the movement in Canada, how then could they possibly control it in the United States Maryhrt http://www.nationalpost.com/m/wp/news/blog.html?b=news.nationalpost.com/2012/12/29/anti-government-freemen-movement-creating-major-policing-problem-report&pubdate=2012-12-30 Anti-government freemen movement creating ‘major policing problem’: report Douglas Quan, Postmedia News Saturday, Dec. 29, 2012 Freeman Robert Menard holds the badge of a related group of self-proclaimed peace officers. worldfreemansociety.org An anti-government movement known as Freeman on the Land has become a “major policing problem” in several provinces, according to a threat assessment by Canada’s spy officials. The report by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service lists Freeman members among “domestic extremists” who associate with issue-based causes, such as environmentalism, anti-capitalism, anti-globalization and far-right racism. Its adherents fall on both the left and right wings of the political spectrum, but “at the core” of the movement is the belief that “government operates outside of its legal jurisdiction and therefore Freeman members do not recognize the authority of national, provincial, or municipal laws, policies or regulations,” says the report, titled Canada: Biannual Update on Terrorist and Extremist†Threats, which was prepared in April and released under federal access-to-information laws. “Freeman members now constitute a major policing problem in several provinces and have occasionally engaged in acts of violence against the police,” the report states. In various videos posted online, supporters of the Freeman movement in Canada – including outspoken advocate Robert Menard – reject any association with violent extremism and insist they are “peaceful and loving.” Law enforcement officials are not convinced. A national RCMP spokeswoman said Friday that the force is working with the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police to develop materials for front-line officers to increase their awareness and understanding of the Freeman movement and its followers. “Individuals associated to this movement are a concern because some followers advocate violence to promote their views and this may involve violence toward police officers,” Sgt. Julie Gagnon said in an email. “There are officer safety concerns when dealing with followers of this movement during routine police interaction.” Last month, the Anti-Defamation League published a report that described the so-called “sovereign citizen movement” as “one of the most problematic domestic extremist movements in the United States,” attracting mostly middle-aged or older men who are financially stressed, angry at government regulation or who want “something for nothing.” A Freeman licence plate, which is put on their vehicles instead of a real, government-issued one. Facebook The report cited the 2010 shooting deaths of two West Memphis, Ark., police officers during a traffic stop. The suspects, a father and son who were later killed in a shootout with police, belonged to the sovereign citizen movement. Earlier this year, a Nova Scotia jury convicted a man of uttering a threat to kill police officers and for multiple firearms offences. Court records state that Daren McCormick, a Freeman on the Land follower, told an officer that he could outdraw police and that if a police cruiser ever pulled up in his yard, he’d kill the officers. When police moved to arrest him the following day, they found him with a loaded .44-calibre revolver in a holster strapped to his hip. McCormick asserted that the doctrines of Freeman on the Land free him from the Criminal Code, including its gun laws, and that he was free to carry a gun even to go grocery shopping, according to the records. He also claimed his right to travel highways without a licence or registration. Last year, RCMP officials in B.C. issued a bulletin to officers urging them to be cautious when dealing with suspected Freemen because of their belief in the right to use force in defence of their land, property and family. The bulletin said some followers may refer to themselves using the phrase “of the family,” such as “John of the Family Smith,” or claim to be a “Son of God.” They also may present to officers a document that they believe exempts them from the authority of the police and entitles them to charge fees if they are detained. “Subjects make continued use of nonsensical legal/quasi-legal jargon,” the bulletin said. Some Canadian judges have expressed frustration with Freemen tying up the court system. In September, John Rooke, associate chief justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench in Alberta, issued a scathing ruling against a self-described Freeman, Dennis Larry Meads, for holding up his divorce proceedings by making “bluntly idiotic” arguments. At one point, court records state, after the judge informed Meads of the basics of family law proceedings, Meads replied that “there are rules above man’s rules, and God’s laws is where your laws originated from.” The judge characterized the “gurus” behind the Freeman on the Land and similar movements as “nothing more than “con men,” who pitch distorted world views on followers through seminars, books, websites and DVDs. Judge’s scathing ruling against Alberta ‘freeman’ could signal clampdown on anti-government movement http://www.nationalpost.com/m/wp/news/blog.html?b=news.nationalpost.com/2012/09/28/judges-scathing-ruling-against-alberta-freeman-could-signal-clampdown-on-anti-government-movement http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=265096 |
A novel approach to the gun ownership issue...
WELL REGULATED AMERICAN
MILITIAS !
WRAM - WE DEDICATE
OUR HEARTS,MINDS AND BODIES TO PROTECTING OUR GREAT REPUBLIC!
A novel approach to the
gun ownership issue...
·
Posted
by Ron Canale on
November 29, 2012 at 7:03pm
THIS M A Y M A KE
YOUR D A Y!
Vermont State Rep.
Fred Maslack has read the Second A mendment to the U.S. Constitution, as
well as Vermont 's own Constitution very carefully, and his strict
interpretation of these documents is popping some eyeballs in New England and
elsewhere.
Maslack recently
proposed a bill to register "non-gun-owners" and require them to pay
a $500 fee to the state. Thus Vermont would become the
first state to require a permit for the luxury of going about unarmed and
assess a fee of $500 for the privilege of not owning a gun.
Maslack read the
"militia" phrase of the Second A mendment as not only the right of
the individual citizen to bear arms, but as 'a clear mandate to do so'. He
believes that universal gun ownership was advocated by the Framers of the
Constitution as an antidote to a "monopoly of force" by the
government as well as criminals.
Vermont ’s
constitution states explicitly that "the people have a right to bear arms
for the defense of themselves and the State" and those persons who are
"conscientiously scrupulous of bearing arms" shall be required to
"pay such equivalent." Clearly, says Maslack, Vermonters have a
constitutional obligation to arm themselves, so that they are capable of
responding to "any situation that may arise."
Under the bill,
adults who choose not to own a firearm would be required to register their
name, address, Social Security Number, and driver's license number with the
state. "There is a legitimate government interest in knowing who is not prepared to defend the state should they be asked
to do so," Maslack says.
Vermont already
boasts a high rate of gun ownership along with the least restrictive laws of
any state. It's currently the only state that allows a
citizen to carry a concealed firearm without a permit. This combination of
plenty of guns and few laws regulating them has resulted in a crime rate that
is the third lowest in the nation.
" America is at
that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to
shoot the bastards." This makes sense! There is no reason why gun owners
should have to pay taxes to support police protection for people not wanting to
own guns. Let them contribute their fair share and pay their own way.
Sounds reasonable to
me! Non-gun owners require more police to protect them and this fee should
go to paying for their defense!
I LIKE IT - DO YOU?
Pastor Removal from Television
Please scroll to the bottom to find
out how to do this petition.
Christopher
This e-mail, including any attachments and response string, may contain proprietary information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the author by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment immediately. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, forward, copy, print or rely on this e-mail in any way except as permitted by the author. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments may be privileged, confidential, or proprietary to Transocean. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying, relying upon, or disseminating the information, and the sender disclaims any liability for such unauthorized use. Further, if you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message from your computer. Thank you. Information contained in this email is subject to the disclaimer found by clicking on the following link: http://www.lyondellbasell.com/Footer/Disclaimer/ |
Senate Deal Keeps Most Tax Cuts
Subj: Breaking from Newsmax.com
Senate Deal Keeps Most Tax Cuts The White House and Mitch McConnell have
reached a tentative deal early New Year's Day. The measure would raise
taxes by about $600 billion over 10 years and delay for two months
across-the-board sp
|
Obama’s Tax Evaders of the Year
Obama’s Tax Evaders of the Year
By Michelle Malkin • January 1, 2013
08:54 AM
Well, it happened last night. The U.S. Senate Democrats and bend-over Republicans delivered a massive tax-hike/puny spending-cut bill in the ratio of 41-to-1 tax hikes to spending cuts. This is the Washington idea of a “balanced approach” to our fiscal woes. The McConnell-Biden love connection screwed us over big time.
But as American families, business owners, and struggling entrepreneurs now brace for their “fair share” punishment, many of Obama’s wealthiest friends are busy evading the tax hikes their candidate spearheaded. Let’s ring in the new year exposing the hypocrites.
Obama’s Tax Evaders of the Year
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2012
President Obama will kick off the new year the same way that he kicked off the old year: by demanding that the wealthy pay their “fair share” in taxes. But while millions of small business owners, struggling entrepreneurs, inventors, and investors brace for a double whammy of fiscal cliff tax hikes and new Obamacare taxes, the class warrior-in-chief’s richest pals are getting a pass.
It’s a Golden Pass for liberal millionaires and billionaires who support higher Obama taxes for everyone but themselves. Meet the Democratic tax evaders of the year.
*GOOGLE. The left-wing Internet giant provided Silicon Valley’s biggest campaign finance boost to Obama, with individual employee donations supporting the tax-hiking candidate by a ratio of more than 31-to-one. Google rank-and-file workers pitched in some $800,000 to Obama. Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt, Google cofounder Sergey Brin, Chief Legal Officer and Senior Vice President David Drummond, and Google vice president and chief Internet evangelist Vint Cerf are all vocal Obama supporters and top donors.
In December, Google’s Netherlands subsidiary disclosed in a tax filing that it had shifted nearly $10 billion in revenues to a Bermuda shell company. That’s “almost double the total from three years before,” according to Bloomberg News. In response to criticism, Google defended the scheme as a legal response to government incentives. “It’s called capitalism,” Schmidt snarked defiantly.
Wonder what all of Obama’s operatives and media lapdogs who bashed evil, selfish Republican offshore tax havens have to say about that? Cue crickets chirping.
*The Washington Post. Speaking of media lapdogs, this newspaper sanctimoniously supported Obama for president and singled out his support for “revenue [tax] increases.” Its endorsement editorial castigated Mitt Romney for embracing an America “in which an ever-greater share of the nation’s wealth resides with the nation’s wealthy, at a time when inequality already is growing.”
The privileged wealthy barons at the Washington Post, however, increased that inequality at the end of the year when they joined a growing number of companies who are paying 2013 dividends in 2012 to protect investors from paying higher Obama taxes on dividend income. It’s “proof positive,” my friend and guest-blogger Doug Powers noted, “that no matter what happens in the negotiations, the country is definitely going off the irony cliff.”
Bonus irony: The $70 million year-end dividend payment will be a windfall for other “higher taxes for thee, but not for me” Obama supporters, including donor Warren Buffet’s firm Berkshire Hathaway. According to the Associated Press, “Berkshire is its largest shareholder with an estimated 1.7 million shares, which means it could
get a roughly $17 million dividend payment.”
*Costco. The mega-retailer’s co-founder, Jim Sinegal, is a lifelong Democrat and top Obama fundraiser. He crusaded aggressively for Obamacare and sent out a campaign dispatch defending his candidate from criticism over his “you didn’t build that remarks.” But while Sinegal purported to speak for beleaguered small business owners, his company was availing itself of rarified tax avoidance strategies. Like the Washington Post, the Costco Board of Directors voted to pay special $7 per share year-end dividends to avoid higher taxes. In addition, Costco will borrow $3.5 billion to finance the payout, according to the Wall Street Journal. Higher taxes, more debt. They built that.
*Facebook. The social networking giant’s founder Mark Zuckerberg told Obama in 2011 at a town hall forum that he was “cool” with paying higher taxes. But neither Zuckerberg nor his many Facebook execs are actually down with following through. Co-founder Eduardo Saverin renounced his American citizenship in a blindingly obvious bid to evade nearly $70 million in taxes. In addition, Zuckerberg and a half-dozen Facebook insiders are all skirting hefty estate and gift taxes on their family Facebook shares held in annuity trusts. According to the Wall Street Journal the legal maneuver is called a “grantor-retained annuity trust, or GRAT,” and the total Facebook tax avoidance sum adds up to at least $200 million. A “cool” $200 million, that is.
*George Lucas. The billionaire Star Wars director called Obama a “hero” and parroted his candidate’s capitalism-bashing rhetoric in a January 2012 interview with PBS dinosaur Charlie Rose. “I do not believe that the rich should be able to buy the government,” Lucas lectured. He does, however, believe in shirking higher taxes the one-percenter way. In October, Lucas sold his film company to Disney for a whopping $4 billion in cash and stock to evade anticipated capital gains tax increases and Obamacare Medicare surtaxes on investment income.
*Andre “Dr Dre” Young. Forbes magazine named this California gangsta rapper-turned-music industry mogul the highest-paid musician in the world in 2012. He raked in an estimated $100 million, mostly from sales of his Beats headphone company along with concert revenue. Dre’s music electronics company was co-founded with Jimmy Iovine, who also founded Dre’s parent record label, Interscope Records. Interscope was funded by “progressive” billionaire Ted Field, heir to the Marshall Field retail empire and one of the nation’s biggest Democratic Party donors.
Dre boosted the careers of prominent Obama hip-hop cheerleaders Eminem and 50 Cent. But overseas, he’s rolling like a Romney supporter. The rap mogul is now using a County Cork, Ireland, tax haven to protect his global headphones empire subsidiaries and avoid high U.S. corporate tax rates. The Irish Examiner newspaper explained that the elaborate structuring “allows for money to be [channeled] between the separate companies in the form of royalty payments or [license] fees to artificially but legitimately reduce profits as a means of reducing tax liabilities.”
To paraphrase Dre and his Obama-endorsing rap partner Snoop Dogg, it ain’t nuthin’ but an E thang: Elitism. Exemptions. Evasion.
~ For the latest breaking news, be
sure to
Essential CRITICAL FACTS For All Americans To Read
 |
Essential
CRITICAL FACTS For All Americans To Read
by
cadmar1944
|
Reblogged
from Rense.com
Author: Dr Leonard Coldwell
12-29-12
12-29-12
HERE ARE FACTS MOST DON'T KNOW, BUT SHOULD...
1.
The IRS is not a US government agency. It is an agency of the IMF
(International Monetary Fund) (Diversified Metal Products v I.R.S et al.
CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391)
CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391)
2.
The IMF (International Monetary Fund) is an agency of the U.N. (Black's Law
Dictionary 6th Ed. page 816)
3.
The United States has NOT had a Treasury since 1921 (41 Stat. Ch 214 page 654)
4.
The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF (International Monetary Fund) (Presidential
Documents Volume 24-No. 4 page 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-2887)
5.
The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a
United States! No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of bankruptcy it
is finally over. (Executive Order 12803)
6.
The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of
the U.S. government, even though the "U.S. Government" held stock in
the agencies. (U.S. v Strang, 254 US491 Lewis v. US, 680 F.2nd, 1239)
7.
Social Security Numbers are issued by the U.N. through the IMF (International
Monetary Fund). The application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 Form.
The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 forms and not the Social
Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who publishes them
while the old form states they are "Department of the Treasury". (20
CFR (Council on
Foreign Relations) Chap. 111 Subpart B. 422.103 (b))
Foreign Relations) Chap. 111 Subpart B. 422.103 (b))
8.
There are NO Judicial courts in America and have not been since 1789. Judges do
not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and
Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat 138-178)
9.
There have NOT been any judges in America since 1789. There have just been
administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat.
138-178)
10.
According to GATT (The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) you MUST have a
Social Security number. (House Report (103-826)
11.
New York City is defined in Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph
Guiliani stated on C-Span that "New York City is the capital of the
World." For once, he told the truth. (20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111, subpart B 44.103 (b) (2) (2) )
World." For once, he told the truth. (20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111, subpart B 44.103 (b) (2) (2) )
12.
Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust
Fund. (Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619 Steward Co. v. Davis 301 US 548)
13.
Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF (International Monetary
Fund), which is an agency of the United Nations. (It says "U.S.
Department of Treasury" at the top left corner, which again is part of the U.N. as pointed out above)
Department of Treasury" at the top left corner, which again is part of the U.N. as pointed out above)
14.
You own NO property. Slaves can't own property. Read carefully the Deed to the
property you think is yours. You are listed as a TENANT. (Senate Document
43, 73rd Congress 1st Session)
15.
The most powerful court in America is NOT the United States Supreme court, but
the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 PA. C.S.A. 502)
16.
The King of England financially backed both sides of the American Revolutionary
War. (Treaty of Versailles-July 16, 1782 Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)
17.
You CANNOT use the U.S. Constitution to defend yourself because you are NOT a
party to it! The U.S. Constitution applies to the CORPORATION OF THE
UNITED STATES, a privately owned and operated corporation (headquartered out of
Washington, DC) much like IBM (International Business Machines, Microsoft, et
al) and NOT to the people of the sovereign Republic of the united States of
America. (Padelford Fay & Co. v The Mayor and Alderman of the City of
Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)
18.
America is a British Colony. The United States is a corporation, not a land
mass and it existed before the Revolutionary War and the British Troops did not
leave until 1796 (Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat
116, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association
October 20, 1774)
20.
Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213)
21.
The Pope can abolish any law in the United States (Elements of Ecclesiastical
Law Vol. 1, 53-54)
22.
A 1040 Form is for tribute paid to Britain (IRS Publication 6209)
23.
The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and
discovery. (Papal Bulls of 1495 & 1493)
24.
The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people.(Papal
Bulls of 1455 & 1493)
25.
The Pope's laws are obligatory on everyone. (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec,
lib, ix, c. vii, n. 4. Prati, 1844 Syllabus Prop 28, 29, 44)
26.
We are slaves and own absolutely nothing, NOT even what we think are our
children. (Tillman vs. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten vs. Van Koten 154 N.E.
146, Senate Document 438 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13
N.Y. REP 378, 481)
27.
Military dictator George Washington divided up the States (Estates) in to
Districts (Messages and papers of the Presidents Volume 1 page 99 1828
Dictionary of Estate)
28.
"The People" does NOT include you and me. (Barron vs. Mayor and City
Council of Baltimore 32 U.S. 243)
29.
It is NOT the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect THE
CORPORATION and arrest code breakers. (SAPP vs. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363,
REiff vs. City of Phila. 477 F. 1262, Lynch vs. NC Dept. of Justice 376 S.E.
2nd. 247)
30.
Every thing in the "United States" is up for sale: bridges, roads,
water, schools, hospitals, prisons, airports, etc, etc... Did anybody take time
to check who bought Klamath Lake?? (Executive Order 12803)
31.
"We are human capital” (Executive Order 13037) The world cabal makes
money off of the use of your signatures on mortgages, car loans, credit cards,
your social security number, etc.
32.
The U.N. - United Nations - has financed the operations of the United States
government (the corporation of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) for over 50 years
(U.S. Department of Treasury is part of the U.N. see above) and now owns every
man, woman and child in America.
The
U.N. also holds all of the land of America in Fee Simple.
Source: http://home/iae.nl/users/lightnet/world/essays.html
Source: http://home/iae.nl/users/lightnet/world/essays.html
The
good news is we don't have to fulfill "our" fictitious obligations.
You can discharge a fictitious obligation with another's fictitious obligation.
These
documents are not secret. They are a matter of public record.
Simple
words such as "person" "citizen" "people"
"or" "nation" "crime" "charge"
"right" "statute" "preferred" "prefer"
"constitutor" "creditor" "debtor"
"debit" "discharge" "payment" "law" and
"United States" doesn't mean what we think it does because we were
never taught the legal definitions of the above words.
The
illusion is much larger than what is cited.
cadmar1944 | January 2, 2013 at 10:39 |
Categories: activism,
Bankruptcy,
Disclosure,
Education,
FED,
Global
Non-Compliance, IRS,
Unity
| URL: http://wp.me/puGa1-bN
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
