Sunday, May 5, 2013

GENERAL CITES BIBLE COMMENT AS 'REAL COURAGE'


  • Text smaller
  • Text bigger
Given the current threats under a progressive administration in Washington on religious rights, especially for members of military, it took “real courage” for an admiral simply to say he gave a Bible to a hurting soldier and would do so again.
That’s according to Gen. Jerry Boykin, executive vice president of the Family Research Council, which was the target of a violent attack by a leftist last year.
Boykin was citing the bold statement by Coast Guard Rear Admiral William D. Lee  at Thursday’s National Day of Prayer event in Washington.
Lee recalled a recent meeting with a young soldier who had tried to kill himself but survived the gunshot to his own head.
Lee said he knew he needed to respond, and he gave the soldier a Bible.
“The lawyers tell me that if I do that, I’m crossing the line. I’m so glad I’ve crossed that line so many times,” said the admiral, who received a standing ovation.
That statement, Boykin said, is worthy of admiration.
“Rear Admiral William Lee demonstrated real courage yesterday when he spoke at the National Day of Prayer event in the nation’s capital,” Boykin confirmed.
“I have seen courage manifested in many ways, including the ultimate sacrifice of one’s life for one’s country, but this type of moral courage is becoming more and more rare,” Boykin said. “This is especially true as we live in an environment increasingly hostile toward religious expression.
“The kind of courage that the admiral displayed yesterday is a refreshing reminder that there are still courageous men in uniform. Rear Admiral Lee spoke of rules in the uniformed services that prevent Christians from sharing their faith and he pledged to continue to be open about his faith regardless of the pressure not to. He obviously knows that he has a constitutional right to share his faith unimpeded. Talking about Jesus Christ with interested friends and colleagues should be as natural and protected as talking about sports teams and the weather. That it is now under threat is simply un-American.”
Boykin said, “You want a real hero? Just look no further than Rear Admiral William D Lee.”
Lee had pledged not to back down from “my right under the Constitution to tell a young man that there is hope.”
And he warned that military members need to be prepared for “the storm that I am almost certain will come.”
“Hopefully, the skeptics who have offered opinions about the extent of hostility toward Christians in our uniformed services will wake up and take notice of what the admiral said yesterday,” Boykin said. “He is giving you the truth and it is hard truth that must cause concern among all Americans and not just Christians.”
The speech followed a week of controversy after the Washington Post reported last Friday that anti-Christian activists had met with senior Pentagon officials to press for the court-martial of Christians in the military who “promote their personal religious beliefs to their subordinates or to extend preferential treatment for any religion.”
The Post said the activists were given assurances that an instruction booklet on proselytizing would be forthcoming within the next few weeks.
According to FRC, since then, the Pentagon has issued several statements, but none has explained what assurances were offered in the meeting and if none were offered, why the Pentagon has not made clear that anti-Christian activist Mikey Weinstein has misrepresented his relationship with the Air Force.
Since Monday evening, more than 130,000 people have signed an FRC petition urging the Pentagon to scrub plans to censor religious beliefs.
WND reported just days ago that the Pentagon announced military members who want to talk about their faith with other members have every right to do so, backtracking on a previous warning against “proselytizing,” which it said could be subject to court-martial.
The statement from Lt. Cmdr. Nathan Christensen said the Department of Defense “never and will never single out a particular religious group for persecution or prosecution.”
The Pentagon walked back its statement after the Alliance Defending Freedom filed a Freedom of Information Act request for records relating to Pentagon statements on the issue.
“Members of our military should not be denied the very freedoms they fight to defend. Freedom of religion and speech are paramount among those freedoms,” said ADF Legal Counsel Joseph La Rue. “We appreciate the Pentagon’s clarification, but little or no evidence exists of coercive proselytization in the military, so we are still troubled over what motivated the original comments.”
The Pentagon’s Christensen said in the statement that the Department of Defense department “makes reasonable accommodations for all religions and celebrates the religious diversity of our service members.”
“Service members can share their faith (evangelize), but must not force unwanted, intrusive attempts to convert others of any faith or no faith to one’s beliefs (proselytization),” he said.
The Department of Defense, Christensen said, places “a high value on the rights of members of the military services to observe the tenets of their respective religions and respects (and supports by its policy) the rights of others to their own religious beliefs, including the right to hold no beliefs.”
He said members are free to exercise their constitutional right to practice their religion “in a manner that is respectful of other individuals’ rights to follow their own belief systems; and in ways that are conducive to good order and discipline; and that do not detract from accomplishing the military mission.”
The issue surfaced after Weinstein met with department officials and then wrote that Christians in the military are “monsters” who must be stopped from talking about their faith.
Weinstein had declared: “We face incredibly well-funded gangs of fundamentalist Christian monsters who terrorize their fellow Americans by forcing their weaponized and twisted version of Christianity upon their helpless subordinates in our nation’s armed forces.”
In an interview with Fox News, Weinstein said the military needs to begin prosecuting Christians who share their faith.
“Someone needs to be punished for this,” he said. “Until the Air Force or Army or Navy or Marine Corps punishes a member of the military for unconstitutional religious proselytizing and oppression, we will never have the ability to stop this horrible, horrendous, dehumanizing behavior.”
It seemed the military was listening, with a statement that, “Religious proselytization is not permitted within the Department of Defense.”
Weinstein, according to Fox News’ Todd Starnes, told officials at the meeting that U.S. troops who evangelize are guilty of sedition and treason and should be punished, by the hundreds if necessary.
But leaders of the Washington-based Family Research Council said the Pentagon’s apparent intent to punish evangelism makes no sense.
“Why would military leadership be meeting with one of the most rabid atheists in America to discuss religious freedom in the military,” asked FRC President Tony Perkins in a Fox News interview. “That’s like consulting with China on how to improve human rights.”
Boykin said, “This has the potential to destroy military recruiting across the services as Americans realize that their faith will be suppressed by joining the military. Our brave troops deserve better. If chaplains and other personnel are censored from offering the full solace of the Gospel, there is no religious freedom in the military.”
Ron Crews of the Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty told Starnes: “Saying that a service member cannot speak of his faith is like telling a service member he cannot talk about his spouse or children. I do not think the Air Force wants to ban personnel from protected religious speech.”
However, Weinstein told the Washington Post that such conversation is a national security threat and “sedition and treason.”
Ken Klukowski, a senior fellow for religious liberty at FRC, noted that Weinstein cites Focus on the Family founder James Dobson as “illustrating the extremist, militant nature of these virulently homophobic organizations’ rhetorically charged propaganda.”
Weinstein concludes: “Let’s call these ignoble actions what they are: the senseless and cowardly squallings of human monsters.”
Kulkowski pointed out that Weinstein endorses the Southern Poverty Law Center, which publishes a list of “hate groups” that lump together Christian organizations such as FRC with the Ku Klux Klan.
As WND reported, the man who shot a security guard at FRC headquarters last August, Floyd Lee Corkins II, confessed that he targeted FRC because of information provided by SPLC.
Asked by the FBI why he picked FRC to attack, Corkins stated, “It was a, uh, Southern Poverty Law, lists, uh, anti-gay groups. I found them online. I did a little bit of research, went to the website, stuff like that.”
FRC said that when Corkins later pleaded guilty to a charge of domestic terrorism, the SPLC “was connected in federal court in this first domestic terrorism conviction in Washington, D.C., under the post 9/11 law.”
SPLC has refused FRC’s demand to remove the Christian organization from the hate list.
In an FBI interview, Corkins confessed he wanted to “kill as many people as I could.”

SOUND OFF ON REPORTS CHRISTIANS IN THE MILITARY WHO SHARE THEIR FAITH COULD BE COURT MARTIALED
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/general-cites-bible-comment-as-real-courage/#h5qfx56FFEXgX5tP.99 

Saturday, May 4, 2013

All Wars Are Fought for Usury


The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

All Wars Are Fought for Usury
Posted By: RumorMail [Send E-Mail]
Date: Saturday, 4-May-2013 22:48:34

This is what Nathaniel Rothschild (1777-1836) really meant:
"He who owns the money supply owns the people."
The human race has been enslaved by sociopathic bankers, who now use bogus terrorism as a pretext to ensure they can collect their bogus debt. A Rockefeller admitted that terror is a hoax. (3.21 min)
Using Gentile fronts, Illuminati Jewish bankers succeeded in privatizing the money supply and making it a liability of the State ("the national debt.") Money is a medium of exchange, like a coupon. It has no intrinsic value but is essential for economic vitality. The bankers control the corporations that control the politicians and mass media, and ensure humanity is diverted and depleted by bogus wars and depressions while their "world government" apparatus is erected.
Using Gentile fronts, Jewish bankers succeeded in privatizing the money supply and making it a liability of the State. (This is like controlling the oxygen supply.) Money is just a medium of exchange, like a coupon. It has no intrinsic value. They have bought everyone and everything worth owning, beginning with politicians and mass media, and ensured that humanity is diverted and depleted by constant wars and depressions. -
See more at: http://www.henrymakow.com/index.html#sthash.NKWPqg57.dpuf
Here, Jyri Lina traces the origins of the Bank of England and its consequences: "All great wars have been started and financed by the economic conglomerate emanating from one single banking family--the Rothschilds."
In November of 1688 (under the sign of the scorpion) the Catholic king of England James II (Stuart) was overthrown through a well-organized invasion financed by the moneyed Jews of Amsterdam and led by the Prieure de Sion and the Orange Order.
180px-Don_Francisco_Lopes_Suasso.jpg(l. Abraham Israel Suasso, helped finance invasion)
The king was exiled to France and in February of 1689 William of Orange, the prince of Nassau, was put upon the English throne. This became known as the "Glorious Revolution." Even official historians admit that the people did not participate in this coup.
England was in poor condition after 50 years of war with France and the Netherlands. William III asked several powerful bankers for help. They provided the English state with a loan of 1.25 million pounds but only delivered 750,000 pounds. The terms of the loan were as follows; the names of the lenders were not to be revealed, and these were guaranteed the right to found the Bank of England, whose directors were able to issue loans to a value of 10 pounds for each pound of deposited gold in the bank vault. They also were allowed to consolidate the national debt and secure payment for annuity and interest through direct Taxation of the people.
The privately owned Bank of England was established in 1694 with absolute control over the currency (the right to issue bank notes). The lending of money on usury continued at an even larger scale. Thus the English people suffered a huge national debt. Taxes had to be raised and prices doubled. To the Masonic bankers it was necessary to have a monopoly on money issuing. That way they were able to make enormous profits and also control political processes.
The Bank of England was allowed to lend money to an amount 10 times the security the lender put. up. With 5 percent interest it only took two years for the bank to earn back an amount equal to the original security.
By the year 1698, the national debt had risen from one and a quarter million pounds to 16 million. In 1815 it was 885 million pounds and in 1945 it had grown to 22.5 billion pounds. By 1995 the national debt had risen to more than 300 billion pounds, equal to 45 percent of GNP.
Not even the Macmillan Committee, which was appointed in 1929, managed to find out who governed the Bank of England. Only one name has leaked out--that of Rothschild. All great wars have been started and financed by the economic conglomerate emanating from one single banking family--the Rothschilds.
SPREAD OF CENTRAL BANKS
In the Netherlands, secret societies had been able to found a central bank as early as 1609. About 40 of the world's most important central banks were established in a similar way as that of the Bank of England. In that way the Masonic bankers ruled the long-term development in the world with loan interest as a method, the central banks as middlemen, the politicians as dummies and the people as ignorant wage slaves.
The Freemason-controlled banks thus can govern political life by acting without being seen. The English people strengthened the power of these invisible Freemasons through paying taxes during three centuries. Central banks were supposed to keep the economy stable. In reality it works quite differently.
bff.jpgBenjamin Franklin wrote of the British colonies in North America in the 1750s: "Nowhere on Earth does one find a happier and more well-being people." He explained that this was due to that "we in the colonies make our own currency," called "colonial scrip." He further explained: "By issuing our own currency we can control its buying power, and we are not obliged to pay interest to anyone."
In these British colonies in New England, there was a wealth contrasting sharply to the poverty and misery in England. There was enough money, and it was definitely interest free.
When the Masonic bankers in England heard Franklin's speech to the British Parliament, they made sure that Parliament forbade the colonies from using their own financial system. The money supply was reduced in half, and the colonies were forced to borrow money from the Bank of England. The result was steep interest and price increases. Within a year the streets were full of unemployed people.
In American schoolbooks, the reason given for the outbreak of the Revolutionary War was the tea tax. but according to Franklin "the colonies would gladly have borne the little tax" (of 2 percent) on tea and other matters had it not been that England took away their money which created unemployment and dissatisfaction." The result of the influence of the English banks on the British Parliament was horrendous poverty in America. When this situation had been created, it was easy to get people ready for war which the Freemasons did with satisfaction. They wanted a safe base for their future global activities.
Among the men who drew up the Constitution of 1787, many urged protection against the financial drain of the international bankers. Therefore Article 1, Sec. 8 of the Constitution reads: "Congress shall have power ... to coin money, regulate the value thereof..."
Alexander Hamilton, a Freemason and secretary of finance in the government of George Washington, and also the agent of the international financiers, ordered the establishment of a privately owned union bank and the introduction of interest money. His argument was simple; "A limited national debt would he a blessing to a nation " He considered it dangerous for the government to issue its own currency.
Thus the United States got its first central bank in 1791. It was privately owned but had a contract running for only 20 years. It was not renewed when it expired. Andrew Jackson referred to the fact that the Constitution had given Congress the right to issue currency in sufficient quantity but not transfer this right to others.
1812.jpgWAR OF 1812
The Freemason Nathan Rothschild (1777-1836), who partly financed the Napoleonic wars through the Bank of England, subsequently issued an ultimatum--either the contract be renewed or there would be war. Jackson called the Masonic bankers a bunch of thieves and promised to exterminate them. Rothschild gave his own orders: "Teach those insolent Americans a lesson. Force them back to a colonial status."
The British government began to limit the American sea trade and checked the American expansion in Canada. President James Madison let Congress declare war on England. Rothschild's intention was to lay waste the country so that the Americans would be forced to seek financial aid. Great Britain, however, failed to regain the lost colonies, and the United States failed to occupy Canada.
Rothschild did not triumph this time. The renewed central bank contract was again suspended in 1836 during Andrew Jackson's presidency (1829-1837), despite the fact that he was Grand Master of Tennessee. The central bank was temporarily abolished.
Even so European bankers and their American agents managed to exercise an extensive control of the American monetary system. Gustavus Myers admits in his book History of the Great American Fortunes (1910): "Under the surface, the Rothschilds had a direct influence by dictating the American financial laws. The legal records show that they were the ones in control of the old Bank of the United Slates."
In American history books there is nothing about the role of the banks in the first and second American wars of independence (that is 1775-83 and 1812-1814).
- See more at: http://henrymakow.com/2013/05/all-wars-are-fought-for-usury.html#sthash.PTgroFeb.dpuf

ALERT! ALERT! nuclear drill set for montana on monday!


John,
Important to get this out to everyone.  Especially those who are aware of the dismantling being done in Montana.

National ID Card Fight Looming


copy this article and paste it to...everywhere...amazon.com forums...everywhere.

Date:  April 29, 2013

To:     John Tate, President

From: Norm Singleton, Vice President of Policy


Re:     National ID Card Fight Looming

Overview 

It is often said, "No man's life, liberty, or fortune is safe while our legislature is in session." 

Next week, the Senate comes back in session after a brief one-week recess, so buckle up

The schemes are coming fast and furious, as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is trying to finish up ramming a slew of power grabs through the Senate before Congress' extended August recess. 

The fights over the National Internet Tax and gun control haven't gone anywhere. 

But President Obama, Harry Reid, and the bipartisan "Gang of Eight" also want to get their National ID/"Immigration Reform" bill fast-tracked, knowing that time has helped work to defeat these schemes in the past. 

As soon as the Senate comes back next week, the fight could begin. 

I am not exaggerating at all when I say this is the absolute WORST National ID scheme we've seen to date. 

So it's absolutely vital C4L members spring into action to stop this madness NOW. 

If we're going to win this fight - especially after all the other battles we've taken on in recent weeks - we simply must start raising resources and generating No National ID Petitions IMMEDIATELY. 

We're not going to have much time. 

The Gang of Eight's Scheme 

"Control the borders." "Path to citizenship." "Amnesty." 

There's no end to the buzzwords being tossed around. And this fight is about to get white hot! 

But all of the sloganeering is just designed to conceal all the madness contained within this 844-page monstrosity. 

In fact, the problems are almost too many to list. 


Besides dramatically increasing federal spending, this bill mandates every American carry a federally issued National ID card with their photo. 

It also creates a new federal database with biometric information on every American. 

If passed, the bill would: 

*** Require a new National ID card based on Social Security cards and a national database containing biometric identification information, such as fingerprints, retinal scans, or scans of veins on the back of hands, which could easily be used for government tracking. 

*** The card would be required for all U.S. workers regardless of place of birth, making it illegal for anyone to hold a job in the United States who doesn't obtain the ID card; 

*** All employers would be required to purchase an ID scanner to verify the ID cards by making sure the information on the card matches the information in the federal database. 

So every time any citizen applies for a job, the government would know. 

You can bet it's only a matter of time until "ID scans" will be required to travel, attend public events, or make even routine purchases. 

By far, the most dangerous part is the biometric tracking technology, which would allow federal bureaucrats to track our every move. 

In fact, it sends shivers down my spine just reading through all the new mandates and requirements. 

This is exactly the type of battle that often decidd; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">The National ID card is something the establishment of BOTH parties have wanted for years - and they think they finally have the votes to get it done. 

Reading through the names of the top four leaders of the Gang of Eight is enough to make you feel queasy. 

John McCain. Lindsey Graham. Chuck Schumer. Di"background: #F6F6F6;">Knowing many citizens have had massive success derailing National ID schemes at the state level, the statists have come up with a solution . . . 

Federalize it. 

In other words, they're getting rid of mandates on state governments to create conforming ID cards. Under this legislation, the federal government would just take on the responsibility of issuing these IDs! 

The Politics 

The National ID card is something the establishment of BOTH parties have wanted for years - and they think they finally have the votes to get it done. 

Reading through the names of the top four leaders of the Gang of Eight is enough to make you feel queasy. 

John McCain. Lindsey Graham. Chuck Schumer. Dick Durbin. 


These senators, knowing they have absolutely ZERO street cred with pro-limited government grassroots, have tapped Senator Marco Rubio to deliver their message. 

Senator Rubio, of course, has presidential ambitions. 

He's no doubt observed that the last two nominees of the Republican Party - Mitt Romney and John McCain - carved a path to the GOP nomination by consistently stabbing its grassroots' supporters in the back. 

Their strategy is to flat-out IGNORE the National ID portions of the legislation. 


Instead, the focus will be on how the GOP was shellacked in the last election and simply "must" join with President Obama to pass this legislation. 

Just like in the fight over the Second Amendment, >Of course, this will take money, so we'll need a massive influx of funds to accomplish it. 

With so many battles, our funds are running low. 

It's absolutely vital we let C4L members and supporters know just how crucial this battle is and urge them to give as generously as they possibly can. 



Proposed Plan of Attack 

Initially, flooding Senate offices with No National ID Petitions should be our goal. 

This is to ensure every senator understands that American citizens won't be fooled by their attempts to hide the National ID portion of the so-called "Immigration Reform" bill. 

The more Petitions we can generate, the better. 

We should urge every Campaign for Liberty member and supporter to sign a Petition and then immediately begin generating them from other folks, as well. 

Of course, this will take money, so we'll need a massive influx of funds to accomplish it. 

With so many battles, our funds are running low. 

It's absolutely vital we let C4L members and supporters know just how crucial this battle is and urge them to give as generously as they possibly can. 

Their generosity can help us generate the kind of numbers necessary to win. 

As you know, back in 1998, then-Congressman Ron Paul was able to spearhead an effort inside Congress to repeal a National ID scheme. 

Hopefully, C4L supporters will agree to give more than they've done in the past - perhaps even $250 or $100.

If they can't give that much, $50, $35 - or even $10 or $20 - will help tremendously. 

The fight over National ID is absolutely critical. It's not one we can ignore. 

Without signed b>

But the most important thing now is raising money and generating Petitions for the initial portion of this program. 

I know C4L members and supporters understand the stakes. 

We just need to make it clear to them exactly what's going on in Washington, D.C. - and urge them to contribute as generously as possible. 

Hopefully, C4L supporters will agree to give more than they've done in the past - perhaps even $250 or $100.


If they can't give that much, $50, $35 - or even $10 or $20 - will help tremendously. 

The fight over National ID is absolutely critical. It's not one we can ignore. 

Without signed No National ID Petitions - and C4L members' generosity - we'll be dead in the water. 

But this is a fight we CAN win. 

Dear Ron,

Now that President Obama has his bipartisan Gang of Eight, he believes he has all the tools he needs to RAM through a National ID card under the guise of "immigration reform."

This is the worst National ID scheme we've seen yet. And the fight could begin as early as next week!

Please read the memo below from Norm Singleton - C4L's Vice President of Policy - explaining exactly what we're facing right now.

With the Senate coming back into session next week, time is running out.

Please sign your No National ID Petitions IMMEDIATELY
 Ron Paul Chairman
Campaign for Liberty
Dear Ron,

Now that President Obama has his bipartisan Gang of Eight, he believes he has all the tools he needs to RAM through a National ID card under the guise of "immigration reform."

This is the worst National ID scheme we've seen yet. And the fight could begin as early as next week!

Please read the memo below from Norm Singleton - C4L's Vice President of Policy - explaining exactly what we're facing right now.

With the Senate coming back into session next week, time is running out.

Please sign your No National ID Petitions IMMEDIATELY

In Liberty,


John Tate
President

Kansas governor, US AG spar over new state gun law...


Kansas governor, US AG spar over new state gun law...
 
By JOHN HANNA
AP Political Writer
Thursday, May 2, 2013, at 7:25 p.m.
TOPEKA, Kan. — U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has told Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback that a new state law attempting to block federal regulation of some guns is unconstitutional and that the federal government is willing to go to court over the issue.
But Brownback replied in a letter Thursday that Kansans hold dear their right to bear arms and are protecting the state's sovereignty. Secretary of State Kris Kobach, a former law professor who helped draft the law, accused the nation's top law enforcement official of "blustering" over the issue.
"The people of Kansas have clearly expressed their sovereign will," Brownback said at the conclusion of his letter. "It is my hope that upon further review, you will see their right to do so."
Kansas' law declares that the federal government has no authority to regulate guns, ammunition and accessories manufactured, sold and kept only in Kansas. The law also makes it a felony for a federal agent to enforce any law, regulation, order or treaty covering those items.
The new statute says that Kansas-only guns, ammunition and accessories aren't a part of interstate commerce, which the federal government regulates under the U.S. Constitution. But in a letter to Brownback, Holder said the Constitution prohibits states from pre-empting federal laws.
Holder sent his letter April 26, the day after the Kansas law took effect, and the U.S. attorney's office for Kansas released it Thursday.
"Kansas may not prevent federal employees and officials from carrying out their official responsibilities," Holder wrote in his letter. "And a state certainly may not criminalize the exercise of federal responsibilities."
Patricia Stoneking, president of the Kansas State Rifle Association, said gun rights supporters were prepared for such a response from President Barack Obama's administration. The president has sought new gun control measures since December's deadly mass elementary school shooting in Newtown, Conn.
The Republican governor is a gun rights supporter, and the measure passed the GOP-dominated Legislature by wide margins. Kobach also is a Republican.
"I think the people of Kansas are going to back this up," Stoneking said. "Probably thousands of grass-roots citizens are all in."
Brownback said in his letter to Holder: "The right to keep and bear arms is a right that Kansans hold dear."
The governor added, "The people of Kansas have repeatedly and overwhelmingly reaffirmed their commitment to protecting this fundamental right."
The Kansas law is modeled on a 2009 Montana law that is being reviewed by a federal appeals court, and Alaska lawmakers approved a similar measure last month. Alabama, Missouri and Oklahoma lawmakers are considering similar legislation.
Supporters of the Kansas law softened it - to say that federal agents wouldn't be arrested or detained while trials were pending - and insist that it will withstand court scrutiny. A federal agent convicted for the first time under the Kansas law could face six months in prison, though probation would be the presumed sentence.
"These hard-working federal employees cannot be forced to choose between the risk of a criminal prosecution and the continued performance of their federal duties," Barry Grissom, the U.S. attorney for Kansas, said in a statement Thursday.
But Kobach called Holder's analysis "simplistic and incorrect" and said the Kansas law is valid to protect the state's residents against unconstitutional measures enacted by Congress.
"We are very, very confident of our position," Kobach said in an interview. "The state of Kansas is not in any way afraid of a legal challenge."
The office of Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt has already anticipated a potential legal challenge from the federal government, and has asked legislators to increase its budget by $225,000 over the next two years to cover litigation costs.
Stoneking said a dispute could arise after a local gunsmith sells a firearm manufactured in Kansas to a state resident without complying with federal requirements for a background check on the buyer or registering the gun. Kobach agreed.
"Until that actually happens, there won't be any litigation," Stoneking said. "The federal government will have to have some way of finding out."
Supporters of the Kansas law have said they worry about attempts by the federal government to restrict or ban the sale of some weapons - or even confiscate them.
Holder said in his letter that federal law enforcement agencies will "continue to execute their duties to enforce all federal firearms laws and regulations.
"Moreover, the United States will take all appropriate action, including litigation if necessary, to prevent the State of Kansas from interfering with the activities of federal officials enforcing federal law," Holder wrote.
Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/2013/05/02/2786301/holder-to-gov-new-kan-law-is-unconstitutional.html#storylink=cpy

Dinar Intel - 12thman


05/04/2013

12thman said:

Spoke with Aggie buddy just a few minutes ago (2p.m.) and he told me that based off what the HR's are hearing...which isn't much at this time for a reason, that we are looking for it within the next 36 to 48 hours.

The 48 hours started around lunch time Friday. Based off this, I am not flying back to Mexico until late Monday...that's all I have at this time. I'm not a Guru so my silence is based off the fact that the HR's know its at the end and just dealing with "this and that's" and waiting for the final post.

 I Still have great faith that this will show very soon so don't let the silence or lack of postings get to you. Seek God for Peace within and allow Him to take over your mind so it wont turn hateful or depressed, Seek God to take over your mouth/words so it wont speak hate or be resentful.

Enjoy what God has given us today...a beautiful day that we woke up to and that alone is worth being happy and joyful about. Thank you Lord for all that you give and do in my life.

I humble myself before you and ask that you take out all of me and fill me up with You and all your love blessing and joy. Jesus give me strength to care on and when I fall, I know Your love never fails or leaves me...
...

http://www.dinarrecaps.com/our-blog.html

Nuclear Incident drills in Montana starting Monday


This doesn't sound good !!!


Nuclear Incident drills in Montana starting Monday
Posted By: AndiV
Date: Saturday, 4-May-2013 15:56:35
 
If a nuclear incident happened in Montana, key officials don’t want to be meeting each other for the first time.
Military personnel at Malmstrom Air Force Base have regular exercises to test their response procedures and make sure everyone knows what to do and when.
But starting Monday, their training will go to a higher level.
A national exercise, known as NUWAIX 2013, which is executed by U.S. Northern Command and sponsored by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, will bring about 1,000 people to Montana throughout the exercise. The exercise isn’t expected to disrupt the community, but locals may notice additional vehicle traffic in and out of the base, increased helicopter activity and some personnel in hazmat suits or “tent cities” at some of the exercise sites. The majority of the exercise will be contained at Malmstrom and Fort Harrison in Helena.
Personnel from a variety of local and federal agencies, primarily the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Energy, Homeland Security and Federal Emergency Management Agency Region VIII, will augment Malmstrom and other Air Force participants.
The exercise will be scenario based, and participants will respond to a nuclear incident, which could be a DOE shipment in the state, an attack on a nuclear missile site, hostile action on base or the missile field or a range of scenarios.
http://www.greatfallstribune.com/article/20130502/NEWS01/304300038/Nuclear-incident-drills-start-Monday-across-Montana?nclick_check=1
"A range of scenarios..?" Like some stolen explosives from nearby Red Lodge, MT being used to make the drill go live?
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=275938

Massive Disaster Drill Planned at Pennsylvania Amusement Park on May 13


John, These are the same players as Boston..DHS and the rest are not to be trusted to not have anything happen. When they have a drill like this, it is always to take someone out... Lynda


Massive Disaster Drill Planned at Pennsylvania Amusement Park on May 13

This month a massive disaster drill has been planned at a theme park in a small Pennsylvania town.

Photo: Dark Government
By JG Vibes
Intellihub.com
May 4, 2013
The Drill will take place on May 13th at an amusement park called “Dorney Park & Wildwater Kingdom” in central Pennsylvania, and will involve hundreds of emergency responders from around the country.
While there is a very significant probability that this will only be a drill, it is important to get the word out about these exercises before they actually happen so people are already aware if the drill does go live.
According to a local news source:
With the terror of the Boston Marathon fresh in mind, Dorney Park & Wildwater Kingdom will be the site of a large-scale emergency preparedness drill on May 13.  The drill, sponsored by the Northeast Pennsylvania Regional Counter Terrorism Task Force, will center on an emergency incident at the amusement park in South Whitehall Township, replicating “a hazardous condition with multiple casualties during the peak of the park’s summer season,” according to a township news release.
“When an emergency occurs you always revert to the manner in which you have been trained, and during an emergency it’s too late to exchange business cards,” task force manager Robert G. Werts said.
“The goals of [the task force] are to provide training for emergency personnel who will respond to the dangerous conditions they confront and allow those persons to become familiar with the needs and operational abilities of other first responders prior to arriving at an actual emergency,” Werts said.
“Dorney Park is pleased to work with this group of federal, state and local agencies to assist in their training efforts,” said Jason McClure, the park’s vice president and general manager.
the article also mentioned that participants will include the South Whitehall Emergency Management Agency and police department; Lehigh Valley Hazmat/Special Operations; Cetronia Ambulance Corps and Cetronia Fire Department; Lehigh County 911; the Lehigh County coroner’s office; Lehigh Valley Health Network and St. Luke’s University Health Network; and the Allentown and Bethlehem fire departments.
This may only just be a drill as they are saying it is, but these drills are important to look out for, because all too often when something goes wrong, the government is coincidentally staging a drill nearby.
http://intellihub.com/2013/05/04/massive-disaster-drill-planned-at-pennsylvania-amusement-park-on-may-13/

Another Perspective on the RV Timing – Chase Carlton


05/04/2013

Another Perspective on the RV Timing – Chase Carlton -  www.dinardate.com

This is a short post, compared to the dozens and dozens of articles that it draws on, to advance a point for consideration. This is not intended to be a controversial post and it might ruffle some feathers. 

For anyone that follows the host of International investing and currency newsletters and publications you are no doubt aware that the subject of the Iraqi dinar does not appear as frequently as the Vietnamese Dong, which hardly appears at all.

What you have read about - is the currency war being waged. You will also read about weak economies, government debt and capital controls being imposed.  The sounds of war are various Central Banks running their printing presses non-stop. Actual military conflicts are not the real war but rather diversions for the public. 

What more and more non-governmental economic experts are predicting is some form of economic meltdown. A meltdown because the Euro, the Dollar, the Yen, the Yuan and other key fiat currencies are being devalued and the economies they represent are not on the road to recovery despite the sound bites in mainstream media.
...
Bernanke, who testified to Congress that gold is not money, is likely stepping down this year.  There is increasing speculation that in the event of a currency(s) meltdown, someone who is very politically astute in the International theatre will be needed.  The names being mentioned are either Yellin or Geitner.

So think for a moment about the various reasons for the delays and all you have heard about the control of the RV being out of Iraq’s hands.  Consider that the IMF wants to go to a single world currency (SDR’s) versus baskets of currencies.

 Read about all the experts’ recommendations to exit the stock market and get into precious metals and or key commodities and how pensions are at considerable risk in the US. 

The warnings and articles are everywhere – if you are looking beyond the latest Iraqi article. The smart cautious money is following these global recommendations.  How does this relate to the timing of the RV?

Simple really, the central bankers are printing funny money with governmental blessings- created from thin air and electronic digits. This money represents mountains of debt too big to understand.

It no longer has any basis in assets, productivity or is even producing economic growth. In reality the various stimulus and bailout measures have Not produced the desired results. 

Start looking for one of the major currencies to falter. The Pentagon did not have James Rickard design and participate in Currency War Games  (a historic first) because they didn’t believe in the current currency war.

His book and Stockman’s , both make a clear case that the stage is already set for breakdown.  Moving to asset backed currencies on a worldwide basis will incorporate the Iraqi dinar, the Vietnamese Dong and the rest. It is a giant chess match to reduce governmental debt.

 Future taxes, benefits and much of your private accumulated savings hang in the balance.This is a giant struggle for power, domination, control of the economic system and how it will function.

The Iraqi dinar is one card in a much larger hand. How and when the rest of the cards will be dealt and played -  is the world poker match already underway.  Think about it for a few minutes and forget your emotional preference for an RV right now. 

How many hundreds of dates and reasons for when or why the RV would happen – have come and gone?  Look at the unfolding global economic struggles.

It may be a bigger challenge to understand what is happening on the global economic scale but it will produce a great deal more insight about timing then trying to figure out why Maliki is still in power and since he is pro RV, why the RV hasn’t happened for years.

This view may distress people because it likely removes the “tomorrow” factor to some degree. However, trying to force only Iraqi events into being the cause/explanations for the repeated failures of the RV to materialize as predicted, causes you major stress as well.

The good news, about looking at the international currency/economic scene, is you have the opportunity to learn about likely events, problems and solutions. This allows you to plan and take action to protect your assets and invest for the future.

For those that want documentation to support this perspective it will be found in another post that will be on   www.dinardate.com   Don’t take my word for this viewpoint draw your own conclusions.  Read twenty or thirty articles from experts and best-selling authors in the world of International finance.

http://www.dinarrecaps.com/1/post/2013/05/another-rv-timing-perspective-by-chase-carlton.html