The Clinton Foundation Larceny

Posted on August 15, 2013 by Marilyn Assenheim filed under 2016 Election, Business, Ethics, Liberalism, Media, Politics

Share147 Tweet59 Share0 Share280

The New York Times, in what Rush Limbaugh calls a “random act of journalism,” published an article exposing The Clinton Foundation’s larceny. The Times reports that despite having lost tens of millions of dollars since its shady inception, the Clintons will be moving ahead, full throttle, relocating the Foundation’s “nerve center” from its current, highly publicized and politically correct site in Harlem to mid-Manhattan, central to liberal media outlets.

In the process, the name of the Foundation is being changed from “The Clinton Foundation” to “The Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation.” Well, at least that appellation is more honest.

The Clinton family has been a blight visited upon the nation since a boozy, blustering, Slick Willy clambered out of Arkansas, grabbing the public’s eye, along with every female he could reach, and the presidency.

England’s Telegraph reports that Slick Willy met with attorneys and advisors over a year ago. Rather than progress having been made they

“concluded that (the Foundation) was a mess… But what complicated this review – what made its findings more politically devastating – is that the Clinton Foundation has become about more than just Bill. Now both daughter Chelsea and wife, and likely presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton have taken on major roles.”

The New York Times went further: “For all of its successes, the Clinton Foundation had become a sprawling concern, supervised by a rotating board of old Clinton hands, vulnerable to distraction and threatened by conflicts of interest. It ran multimillion-dollar deficits for several years, despite vast amounts of money flowing in.”

Not surprisingly, The Times is tens of millions of dollars short and almost two decades late. Their hesitant evaluation is incorrect. The Foundation wasn’t “threatened by conflicts of interest”; it is steeped in conflicts of interest. Nor has there been any success beyond swelling the Clintons’ coffers and the public’s acceptance of characteristic liberal bleating about good intentions.

The Times catalogues The Clinton Foundation’s commitment to cronyism and corruption over decades. Despite Bill’s ceaseless fundraising, money has disappeared like rain on the Sahara.  The Telegraph cites The New York Times, then adds its own conclusion: “‘efforts to insulate the foundation from potential conflicts have highlighted just how difficult it can be to disentangle the Clintons’ charity work from Mr. Clinton’s moneymaking ventures and Mrs. Clinton’s political future.’ Oh, they're entangled alright.”

And now there’s going to be a new hand on the pirate ship’s helm; once situated in more fashionable, midtown digs Hillary and her staff are moving in. The mission of the Foundation is morphing from its previous, AIDS-poverty-obesity-relieving intention, to reflect a Hillary-driven agenda. According to FOX News, Hillary “reportedly will focus on new initiatives covering women, jobs and other areas.” If this sounds like a campaign platform to you, your discriminatory skills are on target.

We’re told ceaselessly that Hillary is “the smartest woman in America.” One wonders how Medgar Evans’ family feels about that.^[1]

•  
•  
•  
•  
•  

Rate this (5 Votes)

Notes:

1.       “In a speech that denounced Voter ID efforts, Clinton referred to Medgar Evers as ‘Medger Evans’ while discussing how one of her mentors defused a volatile situation in Mississippi after Evers, who courageously organized voter registration efforts in the South, was assassinated.” [↩]

Sponsored From Around the WebNew Rule in Arizona:(SEP 2013): If You Pay For Car Insurance You Better Read This... 7 Secrets To Keep Your Family SafeYour family is in danger. Learn the 7 Secrets before it's too late! Get A Girlfriend NowFree video shows how to "Make Her Your Girlfriend" 7 odd veggies that KILL abdominal fatSurprising foods that boost your metabolism for a flat stomach Controversy Over New Steroid AlternativeRare plant boosts muscle growth over 700% - LEGAL In US...

Tagged with 

Bill Clinton Edgar Evers Hillary Clinton Manhattan Medgar Evans new york times The Clinton Foundation

← Previous Next →

26 thoughts on “The Clinton Foundation Larceny”

1.       JohnGalt says:

August 15, 2013 at 10:14 am

"The Clinton Foundation Larceny"

#######

Why the redundancy?

The deeply soiled name "Clinton" is wholly synonymous with "Larceny".

The oily, perjurious, unaccomplished, habitually corrupt Clintons, commit statist power-enabled felonies as reflexively as honest Americans breathe.

300

Rate this

o   Marilyn says:

August 15, 2013 at 2:58 pm

It is worthy of note because The NYT has jumped on the "destroy Hillary" bandwagon. We all know they are low-life thieves and in competent boobs but why the formerly sycophantic Times has decided to, however gingerly, poke them with a pitch fork is interesting, don't you think? Think The Lyin' King is pulling some of his typical, Chicago thug antics to make life difficult for a 2016 run, perhaps?

90

Rate this

2.       jp says:

August 15, 2013 at 10:58 am

The Clinton name is synonymous with hatred for our military also. God help us if she runs and wins.

250

Rate this

3.       Rocky says:

August 15, 2013 at 12:45 pm

In my opinion, Bill and Hill should move back to Little Rock and retire. Bill can work in his Presidential Library and Massage Parlor and Hillary on her book.

181

Rate this

4.       allen goldberg says:

August 15, 2013 at 12:45 pm

Hillary the smartest woman in America? No even close..On her very worst day...Condi Rice's bowel movements are smarter!! As are many many others...Hillary maybe the most politically nasty, vile woman in america..but nothing more.

270

Rate this

o   Drik says:

August 15, 2013 at 1:05 pm

Got a dollar sez that her mini-series neglects to mention her flunking the New York State bar exam.

Lib-progs are excruciatingly smart. They just aren't very good test takers.

130

Rate this

§  HMathis says:

August 16, 2013 at 11:56 am

Or that Hillary was fired from the Watergate investigation for lying and unethical behavior!

90

Rate this

o   Rattlerjake says:

August 15, 2013 at 3:46 pm

You have to admit the clintons and the rest of the Washington libturds have perfected theft, fraud, self-indulgence, arrogance, immorality, and treason!

180

Rate this

5.       Mary Triola says:

August 15, 2013 at 12:58 pm

Why are people surprised? The Clintons have been surrounded by scandal for years. So now suddenly the NYT is writing this. If these so called journalists weren't so busy sucking up to all the wrong people this would have been reported long ago. Bubba will always be Bubba. Hillary is a fraud. What did she do as senator? What did she do as Secretary.So why now is he changing the name. It is sad this is what our political system has become. We have the Alinskyites running OUR government. If you remember good old Hillary did her thesis on this radical. To quote Mark Levin Hillary is obama in a dress. Bubba has bribed people Hillary has bribed people. Their good friend Vince killed himself. Theses people are criminals it's that simple. How did little georgie porgie get his job with abc? These people never fade away. They are vain and need all the attention all the time.

80

Rate this

o   Richard says:

August 16, 2013 at 1:27 pm

According to a few reports, Vince Foster did not kill himself, look it up.

50

Rate this

o   Marulyn says:

August 16, 2013 at 2:28 pm

Levin is right.

But the surprise issue is just the point. No one is surprised except the Times. And they aren't, really, either. They're just trying to defuse the scandal before 2016 and, possibly, doing a mild hit piece on her at the behest of the Thug In Chief. Oh, yes; part of the (unfortunately) ongoing, incredibly tiresome saga of Clinton reruns is that it is still an open question of whether or not their "good friend" Vince killed himself; their "good friends" have the convenient habit of kicking the bucket before any inconvenient skeletons can be aired out of the Clinton closet.

One of the funniest and least talked about facts of Hillary's totally useless history (she's gotten nowhere except riding on the coattails of men, something she claims to deride) is that she started her political life as a devout Republican, working for Goldwater. She is a virulent joke and one that the libs can't wait to carry around on their shoulders...and saddle on our backs.

10

Rate this

6.       Drik says:

August 15, 2013 at 1:02 pm

Let's take the lady who was directly responsible for security in Benghazi and make her responsible for the security of the whole friggin' country.

What could go wrong?

230

Rate this

o   Chuckster says:

August 15, 2013 at 1:58 pm

They got 214 million last year in donations and come up 8 million short, so someone spent 222 million last year, hmmmmm can they show us where they spent it? And the dumb azz people of this country will probably elect this twit to run America .

160

Rate this

§  Rachel Guess says:

August 16, 2013 at 5:36 am

Chuckster,

Any non-profit is required by law to disclose both it's revenues and expenditures. Go to http://www.guidestar.org and create an account (it's free of charge) and you can look up the last three year's of tax returns for any non-profit organization.

30

Rate this

o   george cullen says:

August 15, 2013 at 6:03 pm

SING IT BROTHER

30

Rate this

7.       AWKingsley says:

August 15, 2013 at 1:10 pm

Actually Sarah Palin just proved she is the smartest woman in America: Sarah just announced her support for Rand Paul.

60

Rate this

8.       EPJ says:

August 15, 2013 at 1:24 pm

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE NOW ANYWAY?

61

Rate this

9.       Walter Luffman says:

August 15, 2013 at 3:32 pm

I'd like to think the only problem is that the money is being "laundered" to make Bill, Hillary and Chelsea rich. Yeah, I'd like to think that; but somehow I think there's even more than that involved here. Is a big chunk of money going to others, perhaps outside America, who don't have our country's best interests at heart? Don't know, but I wonder.

100

Rate this

10.   BillWhit says:

August 16, 2013 at 1:02 am

Hitlery is supposed to be the Smartest Woman in America? Not even close, but she is the Most Corrupt and DisHonest Woman in America, right up there with the Skanky Sasquatch, Michelle Obama, which she has proven that over and over! No, the Skank of Bengazi needs to Retire and spend the rest of her days, unless convicted over her Lying over Bengazi, at her favorite Bull Dyke Bar in Arkansas!

70

Rate this

11.   david says:

August 16, 2013 at 11:46 am

Remember all this, and more come election time. Actually, she should not be permitted to get that far.

If only half of what has been reported in past years is true regarding the clinton's, she should be barred from running. Period.

But I can hear the liberals and socialists and the news media screaming about the past using these words:

"What Difference Dose It Make?"

Press 1 for America; Press 1 for Paul!

00

Rate this

12.   Bill says:

August 16, 2013 at 12:23 pm

Probably would be investigated and found illegal if we had a REAL justice department.

20

Rate this

13.   Alcan says:

August 16, 2013 at 12:51 pm

After years of practice in the art of corruption, both in the Ark. governor's house, followed by a successful run in the WH, why is anybody surprised that there are problems with the Clinton Foundation. But, not to worry, I'm sure that the Chinese will be more than happy to send over boatloads of money to help get another crooked Clinton into the White House. After all, the first one paid off extremely well for them, with Bill approving one of his buddies, Loral, to provide assistance in improving their missile control systems, followed by thousands of pages of top secret military information at the end of his term. Plus, who knows what else they got as a result of Chinagate.

00

Rate this

14.   A Patriot says:

August 16, 2013 at 1:03 pm

What larceny? It's their foundation, idiots give them money and they take it, give it to their friends, or flush it down a toilet. What conflict of interest are you so concerned about. They are all lying thieves, so what? Is there any taxpayer money involved? Any bribery, extortion, or other corruption of government officials involved? This is a pure BS article spinning a tale going nowhere. There is no law with the Clintons or the scum in white house.

00

Rate this

o   Marilyn says:

August 16, 2013 at 2:32 pm

It is larceny because it is categorized by them as a non-profit, not "their" foundation. Non-profits have strict rules and operating a non-profit at a loss is criminal. Like everything else these thieves do. Taxpayer money is involved.

00

Rate this

o   Pete0097 says:

August 16, 2013 at 4:06 pm

People donate to the Foundation so they can buy the Clintons support. IT is a great idea. I wish I could do it. A lot of people on both sides have done it. I get e-mails from them all time. Some are from conservatives wanting to fight the liberals and some are from liberals wanting to fight the conservatives. All the same, they just want money. 

Judge orders trial in allegedly missing Oklahoma City bombing video case 16 September A.D. 2013

Subj: Fwd: Judge orders trial in allegedly missing Oklahoma City bombing video case

16 September A.D. 2013

Remember the security videos confiscated by national law enforcement personnel for purposes of review of who did what regarding the Murrah Building bombing?

Remember Jesse Trentadue, whose brother Kenneth (Kenny) was murdered in the national prison system because he looked (exactly) like Richard Guthrie?

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/OKC_Trentadue.htm

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=171074.40

etc.

It seems that Jesse, an attorney living in Utah, is still very intent on exposing the murder of his brother, which murder is tied directly to the cover-up of the Murrah Building bombing.  (Actually, it goes even well beyond this.  See the P.S.)

There is to be a bench trial (District of Utah) regarding those still-undisclosed ("missing") security videos and the release of them to Trentadue for his study into the murder of his brother.

http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2013/09/judge-orders-trial-in-allegedly-missing.html


From 21 March 2012:

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865552630/FBI-explanation-of-missing-Oklahoma-City-bombing-tapes-not-credible-judge-says.html?pg=all


Regarding preserving evidence, there was an effort to preserve the Murrah Building, which is the "best evidence" of what caused its collapse, led by, if memory serves, attorney (and Sen.) DeCamp, author of "The Franklin Coverup," which exposes the child-porn activity involving the White House and possible child murder at Bohemian Grove.  As that effort developed, the reins of that suit were turned over to appointed defense counsel, e.g., for McVeigh, and next thing we know, the building is being destroyed.

Regarding preserving evidence, there was an effort by the survivors, via two of them as "representatives" of the group of survivors, to preserve the information that McVeigh had, which effort this author labels as The Terre Haute Litigation.

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/okc_coverup.htm (search that page for "Taylor" to go right to the top of the list of links to the .pdf files that comprise the bulk of that Record)

It was The Terre Haute Litigation experience that permanently changed this author's career (life, etc.), given the learning from that effort that we are not dealing with a "constitutional" system.


The fbi claims that the confiscated security videos of the Murrah Building of 19 April 1995 are missing.  The judge is encouraging the fbi to look harder, and now the matter seems to be headed for trial.  This is a FOIA suit by Trentadue.

May the fbi be ordered to turn over the videos, and may the refusal to do so start putting fbi people, all the way to the top, past and present, in jail under contempt charges. (Civil contempt is remedied by performance of the act not being done, the not doing of which act is the reason for the contempt charge.)

Harmon L. Taylor
Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas

Subscribe / unsubscribe :  legal_reality@earthlink.net

P.S.  At http://drjudywood.com/ , under the heading "History Repeats," we start to recognize the direct connection between the Murrah Building bombing and S-11.  Before reading Dr. Wood's excellent book, this author used the term "vaporized" to describe one of the logical possibilities of what happened with the alleged "truck bomb," of which truck there was "no evidence" at the crime scene.  After reading her study and analysis, this author uses the term "dustified." 

It's the nature of our human condition for those who speak thoughts of reality to face ostracism, at the very least.  This author's interview for the (multi-award winning) documentary "A Noble Lie" was left on the cutting room floor, because this author dared to speak forthrightly about technology that is (well) beyond common experience, even to this day.  The options for why there's "no truck" at the Murrah Building crime scene are these: (1) there was never a truck there to begin with (which option is challenged by testimony that put a truck in that location just a few (as in less than five) minutes prior to the explosions; (2) it was driven away prior to the explosions; (3) it was somehow air-lifted out (whether before (during) or after the explosions; or (4) it was "dustified."

Thus, in response to the interview question, along this line, "What would the videos show?", this author said, to this effect, "Proof that the truck was vaporized."

(Would there be those awards if as much of the reality as known about the truck and the logical possibilities were included?  We'll likely never know.)

What do these logical options have to do with Trentadue's FOIA suit?  Those videos will prove "exactly" what happened.  If there was a truck there, and there's testimony putting a truck there, then it was driven away, air-lifted out, or "dustifed."  There are no other logical options.  The point here isn't so much to advance the reality, that the Murrah Building bombing was a test run of the technology used to destroy all seven of the WTC buildings during the S-11 events, as to demonstrate why those videos may never be seen, again, i.e., why that evidence, in the hands of the feds, would be destroyed.  It wouldn't matter whether those videos prove "dustification," or the truck's being driven away, or some form of air-lifting (which surely would have been seen by someone and regarding which there is zero hint or suggestion). What matters is that if any one of those options is proved, then the "government's" horrifically fabricated "one truck bomb" case theory goes flying out the windows.  The trials "had" to be relocated, because a panel comprised of citizens in that community, which community experienced two discrete explosionS, in real time, as it happened, would very likely not buy the "government's" fabricated cover-story of a single truck bomb; hence, all the demonizing of McVeigh so as to "compel" a transfer of venue (across the State lines -- the key procedural fact motivating The Terre Haute Litigation) so as to remove the trial from the community that knew better.   In other words, the "government" has already gone to a great deal of trouble to "sell" the "one truck bomb" cover story, and it's nothing for those involved with that mass murder and coverup to destroy the video that proves, regardless of which alternative it proves, that the cause of the destruction of that building was in no way a "truck bomb," especially if what is shown is the "dustification" of a truck. 

Of course, for there to be evidence of "dustification" in 1995 is for there to be all that much more proof that the muslims didn't do S-11 (either), which reality totally wipes out the S-11 cover-story, as well; hence, wipes out "the" reasons for military activity in Afghanistan, etc.

The wars in the middle east have everything to do with drugs, oil, and banking, and the banking aspect has everything to do with "choice of law."  We see the espionage movies that suggest that the banks have power because they control the debt created by war.  That's only part of the story.  To control the medium of exchange is to control the choice of law for every transaction involving that medium of exchange.  It's the choice of law that provides the mechanism of control, not the (mere) existence of debt, but the choice of law.  To control the medium of exchange is to control the choice of law of the entire marketplace, hence the entire population, especially where the mechanism of control is 100% "federal," as in "commercial," which is our present legal reality.

The point is that those Murrah Building bombing videos are "a million times" more "damaging" than the famed and fictional "Pelican Brief."

It's not that such information is necessarily completely lost; however, such information, if it still existed even as of 10 April 1995 (the day after the massacre), will be proof of Divine Intervention.

In short, we have this.  Those videos are extremely likely to be exculpatory evidence.  (As in, Duh?!  Why else would they not be turned over in the first place??!)  Clearly, that exculpatory evidence was never handed over to the defense at any time, not even at the time of The Terre Haute Litigation, which started and ended under the cover story of there being some 3,000+ pages of information not previously turned over to defense counsel.  That evidence is not even being handed over to Trentadue now, 18 years after the massacre.  The issue about these videos prove that this system's rush to judgment at the time was all just part of the plan, and we can just hope that this experience, of the fed's refusal to turn over potentially exculpatory evidence, forever alters all such legal defense efforts to such future matters such that no trial should be allowed to move forward without extremely strenuous objection to the prosecution's failure to deliver all possible exculpatory evidence.

The thing about a charge of "conspiracy" is that the participants in one part of the act or series of acts that constitute the criminal charge don't have to know any of the other conspirators or even of the acts of any of the other conspirators in order to be treated as "conspirators." Thus, on the one hand, it just flat out doesn't matter that McVeigh didn't have any idea at all that the Murrah Building, the location chosen for storing the investigation (by American law-enforcement personnel) into the (American) drug-trafficking activity involving Mena, Arkansas, thus, obviously, the Clintons (clearly internationalists instead of Americans), was to be a test subject for "dustification" technology.  McVeigh simply had to "deliver" the cover story, i.e., the truck, for the mass murder.  That's just to say that the fact that the damage to the building wasn't caused by any truck bomb wouldn't necessarily get McVeigh (or Nichols) off the hook for the conspiracy charge(s).  However, the fact that the "government's" cover story was a single "truck bomb," and the fact that such theory is preposterous on its face, is something that the advisory panel should have been able to weigh in their deliberations not only of innocence/guilt but also, if guilt is determined, what the punishment should be, whether punishment is to be determined by the court or the panel.  Where it was factually and technologically impossible for any "truck bomb" to have caused the demolition, thus the deaths, that's information, evidence, of an intervening or superseding cause to which any defense counsel would want the advisory panel and the court to have full access. Even more to the point, where there's proof of "dustification," then it screams from the page that McViegh (and Nichols) are not only patsies but also so far removed from the planning and carrying out of that massacre as to compel further investigation so as to get to the actual source of planning and motive for that massacre.

It will be an Act of God if those videos still exist, somewhere, anywhere.  Those videos are not even expected to be in the nsa's files!

That hardly means that someone from the fbi isn't about to get a life term, or a whole group of someones from the fbi, past and present, aren't about to get a life term, under a contempt theory for failure to produce the evidence that's not being produced (because, clearly, it's long since been destroyed).

May this nation stand with Jesse Trentadue in his truly-inspired commitment to expose the murderers of his brother (and, thus, as a direct result, also of Guthrie, who also was murdered while in custody).  It's an end of a ball of yarn that literally unravels all the way to S-11, thus even farther, i.e., to all this false-flag activity going on as we speak regarding Syria and Iran.  In other words, we're hardly talking about a mere set of security videos.  We're talking about evidence that has "a million times" more impact, in real time, than the fictional "Pelican Brief."

H.

U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely

U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary
To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets
No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name
1
1
U.S. SUPREME COURT AND OTHER HIGH COURT CITATIONS PROVING THAT
NO LICENSE IS NECESSARY FOR NORMAL USE OF AN AUTOMOBILE ON COMMON WAYS
"The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn
carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at
will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under
this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the
public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither
interfering with nor disturbing another's rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe
conduct." Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135
"The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon,
in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy
life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the
right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing
modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate
an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business." -Thompson vs. Smith, supra.;
Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784
"… the right of the citizen to drive on a public street with freedom from police interference… is a
fundamental constitutional right" -White, 97 Cal.App.3d.141, 158 Cal.Rptr. 562, 566-67 (1979)
“citizens have a right to drive upon the public streets of the District of Columbia or any other city
absent a constitutionally sound reason for limiting their access.” Caneisha Mills v. D.C. 2009
“The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life
requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the
public highways partakes of the nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional
guarantees. . .” Berberian v. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869, 872, See also: Schecter v. Killingsworth, 380 P.2d 136, 140; 93 Ariz. 273 (1963).
“The right to operate a motor vehicle [an automobile] upon the public streets and highways is not a
mere privilege. It is a right of liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of the
federal and state constitutions.” Adams v. City of Pocatello, 416 P.2d 46, 48; 91 Idaho 99 (1966).
“A traveler has an equal right to employ an automobile as a means of transportation and to occupy the public
highways with other vehicles in common use.” Campbell v. Walker, 78 Atl. 601, 603, 2 Boyce (Del.) 41.
“The owner of an automobile has the same right as the owner of other vehicles to use the highway,* * * A
traveler on foot has the same right to the use of the public highways as an automobile or any other vehicle.”
Simeone v. Lindsay, 65 Atl. 778, 779; Hannigan v. Wright, 63 Atl. 234, 236.
"The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference,
unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a
FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts." People v. Horton
14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971)
“The right to make use of an automobile as a vehicle of travel long the highways of the state, is no longer
an open question. The owners thereof have the same rights in the roads and streets as the drivers of horses
or those riding a bicycle or traveling in some other vehicle.” House v. Cramer, 112 N.W. 3; 134 Iowa 374; Farnsworth v. Tampa Electric Co. 57 So.
233, 237, 62 Fla. 166.
“The automobile may be used with safety to others users of the highway, and in its proper use upon
the highways there is an equal right with the users of other vehicles properly upon the highways.
The law recognizes such right of use upon general principles. Brinkman v Pacholike, 84 N.E. 762, 764, 41 Ind. App. 662, 666.
“The law does not denounce motor carriages, as such, on public ways. They have an equal right with other vehicles in
common use to occupy the streets and roads. It is improper to say that the driver of the horse has rights in the roads
superior to the driver of the automobile. Both have the right to use the easement.” Indiana Springs Co. v. Brown, 165 Ind. 465, 468.
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary
To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets
No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name
2
2
“A highway is a public way open and free to any one who has occasion to pass along it on foot or
with any kind of vehicle.” Schlesinger v. City of Atlanta, 129 S.E. 861, 867, 161 Ga. 148, 159; Holland v. Shackelford, 137 S.E. 2d 298, 304, 220 Ga.
104; Stavola v. Palmer, 73 A.2d 831, 838, 136 Conn. 670
“There can be no question of the right of automobile owners to occupy and use the public streets of
cities, or highways in the rural districts.” Liebrecht v. Crandall, 126 N.W. 69, 110 Minn. 454, 456
"The word ‘automobile’ connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on
highways." -American Mutual Liability Ins. Co., vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200
Motor Vehicle: 18 USC Part 1 Chapter 2 section 31 definitions:
"(6) Motor vehicle. - The term "motor vehicle" means every description of carriage or other contrivance
propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways…" 10) The term "used for
commercial purposes" means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any
business, or other undertaking intended for profit.
"A motor vehicle or automobile for hire is a motor vehicle, other than an automobile stage, used for the
transportation of persons for which remuneration is received." -International Motor Transit Co. vs. Seattle, 251 P. 120
The term ‘motor vehicle’ is different and broader than the word ‘automobile.’" -City of Dayton vs. DeBrosse, 23
NE.2d 647, 650; 62 Ohio App. 232
"Thus self-driven vehicles are classified according to the use to which they are put rather than
according to the means by which they are propelled" - Ex Parte Hoffert, 148 NW 20
"The Supreme Court, in Arthur v. Morgan, 112 U.S. 495, 5 S.Ct. 241, 28 L.Ed. 825, held that carriages
were properly classified as household effects, and we see no reason that
automobiles should not be similarly disposed of." Hillhouse v United States, 152 F. 163, 164 (2nd Cir. 1907).
"...a citizen has the right to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon..."
State vs. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; Cummins vs. Homes, 155 P. 171; Packard vs. Banton, 44 S.Ct. 256; Hadfield vs. Lundin, 98 Wash 516, Willis vs. Buck, 263 P. l 982;
Barney vs. Board of Railroad Commissioners, 17 P.2d 82
"The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a
common and fundamental Right of which the public and the individual cannot be
rightfully deprived." Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22; Ligare vs. Chicago, 28 NE 934; Boon vs. Clark, 214 SSW 607; 25 Am.Jur. (1st)
Highways Sect.163
"the right of the Citizen to travel upon the highway and to transport his property thereon in the
ordinary course of life and business… is the usual and ordinary right of the Citizen, a right
common to all." - Ex Parte Dickey, (Dickey vs. Davis), 85 SE 781
“Every Citizen has an unalienable RIGHT to make use of the public highways of the state; every
Citizen has full freedom to travel from place to place in the enjoyment of life and liberty.” People v.
Nothaus, 147 Colo. 210.
"No State government entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, nor
waterways... transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or business, but by
being subject only to local regulation i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. Travel is
not a privilege requiring licensing, vehicle registration, or forced insurances." Chicago Coach Co. v. City
of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 169 N.E. 22.
"Traffic infractions are not a crime." People v. Battle
"Persons faced with an unconstitutional licensing law which purports to require a license as a
prerequisite to exercise of right... may ignore the law and engage with impunity in exercise of
such right." Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969).
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets
No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 3
"The word 'operator' shall not include any person who solely transports his own property
and who transports no persons or property for hire or compensation." Statutes at Large California Chapter
412 p.83
"Highways are for the use of the traveling public, and all have the right to use them in a reasonable
and proper manner; the use thereof is an inalienable right of every citizen." Escobedo v. State 35 C2d 870 in 8 Cal Jur
3d p.27
“RIGHT -- A legal RIGHT, a constitutional RIGHT means a RIGHT protected by the law, by the
constitution, but government does not create the idea of RIGHT or original RIGHTS; it
acknowledges them. . . “ Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914, p. 2961.
“Those who have the right to do something cannot be licensed for what they already have
right to do as such license would be meaningless.” City of Chicago v Collins 51 NE 907, 910.
“A license means leave to do a thing which the licensor could prevent.” Blatz Brewing Co. v. Collins, 160
P.2d 37, 39; 69 Cal. A. 2d 639.
“The object of a license is to confer a right or power, which does not exist without it.” Payne v.
Massey (19__) 196 SW 2nd 493, 145 Tex 273.
“The court makes it clear that a license relates to qualifications to engage in profession, business,
trade or calling; thus, when merely traveling without compensation or profit, outside of business
enterprise or adventure with the corporate state, no license is required of the natural individual
traveling for personal business, pleasure and transportation.” Wingfield v. Fielder 2d Ca. 3d 213
(1972).
“If [state] officials construe a vague statute unconstitutionally, the citizen may take them at their word, and act on the
assumption that the statute is void.” - Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969).
"With regard particularly to the U.S. Constitution, it is elementary that a
Right secured or protected by that document cannot be overthrown or impaired
by any state police authority." Donnolly vs. Union Sewer Pipe Co., 184 US
540; Lafarier vs. Grand Trunk R.R. Co., 24 A. 848; O'Neil vs. Providence
Amusement Co., 108 A. 887.
"The right to travel (called the right of free ingress to other states, and egress from them) is so fundamental that it
appears in the Articles of Confederation, which governed our society before the Constitution." (Paul v. Virginia).
"[T]he right to travel freely from State to State ... is a right broadly assertable against private interference as well as
governmental action. Like the right of association, it is a virtually unconditional personal right, guaranteed by the
Constitution to us all." (U.S. Supreme Court, Shapiro v. Thompson).
EDGERTON, Chief Judge: “Iron curtains have no place in a free world. ...'Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the
right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal liberty, and the right,
ordinarily, of free transit from or through the territory of any State is a right secured by the Constitution.' Williams v. Fears,
179 U.S. 270, 274, 21 S.Ct. 128, 45 L.Ed. 186.
“Our nation has thrived on the principle that, outside areas of plainly harmful conduct, every American is left to shape
his own life as he thinks best, do what he pleases, go where he pleases.” Id., at 197. Kent vs. Dulles see Vestal, Freedom of Movement, 41
Iowa L.Rev. 6, 13—14.
“The validity of restrictions on the freedom of movement of particular individuals, both substantively and procedurally,
is precisely the sort of matter that is the peculiar domain of the courts.” Comment, 61 Yale L.J. at page 187.
“a person detained for an investigatory stop can be questioned but is “not obliged to answer, answers may not be compelled,
and refusal to answer furnishes no basis for an arrest.”Justice White, Hiibel
“Automobiles have the right to use the highways of the State on an equal footing with other vehicles.”
Cumberland Telephone. & Telegraph Co. v Yeiser 141 Kentucy 15.
“Each citizen has the absolute right to choose for himself the mode of conveyance he desires, whether it be
by wagon or carriage, by horse, motor or electric car, or by bicycle, or astride of a horse, subject to the sole
condition that he will observe all those requirements that are known as the law of the road.” Swift v City of Topeka, 43
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets
No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 4
Kansas 671, 674.
The Supreme Court said in U.S. v Mersky (1960) 361 U.S. 431: An administrative regulation, of course, is
not a "statute."
A traveler on foot has the same right to use of the public highway as an automobile or any other vehicle.
Cecchi v. Lindsay, 75 Atl. 376, 377, 1 Boyce (Del.) 185.
Automotive vehicles are lawful means of conveyance and have equal rights upon the streets with horses
and carriages. Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 205; See also: Christy v. Elliot, 216 Ill.
31; Ward v. Meredith, 202 Ill. 66; Shinkle v. McCullough, 116 Ky. 960; Butler v. Cabe, 116 Ark. 26, 28-29.
…automobiles are lawful vehicles and have equal rights on the highways with horses and carriages. Daily v.
Maxwell, 133 S.W. 351, 354. Matson v. Dawson, 178 N.W. 2d 588, 591.
A farmer has the same right to the use of the highways of the state, whether on foot or in a motor vehicle,
as any other citizen. Draffin v. Massey, 92 S.E.2d 38, 42.
Persons may lawfully ride in automobiles, as they may lawfully ride on bicycles. Doherty v. Ayer, 83 N.E.
677, 197 Mass. 241, 246; Molway v. City of Chicago, 88 N.E. 485, 486, 239 Ill. 486; Smiley v. East St.
Louis Ry. Co., 100 N.E. 157, 158.
"A soldier's personal automobile is part of his ‘household goods[.]’ U.S. v
Bomar, C.A.5(Tex.), 8 F.3d 226, 235" 19A Words and Phrases - Permanent Edition
(West) pocket part 94. "[I]t is a jury question whether ... an automobile ... is
a motor vehicle[.]" United States v Johnson, 718 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir.
1983).
Other right to use an automobile cases:
- EDWARDS VS. CALIFORNIA, 314 U.S. 160
- TWINING VS NEW JERSEY, 211 U.S. 78
- WILLIAMS VS. FEARS, 179 U.S. 270, AT 274
- CRANDALL VS. NEVADA, 6 WALL. 35, AT 43-44
- THE PASSENGER CASES, 7 HOWARD 287, AT 492
- U.S. VS. GUEST, 383 U.S. 745, AT 757-758 (1966)
- GRIFFIN VS. BRECKENRIDGE, 403 U.S. 88, AT 105-106 (1971)
- CALIFANO VS. TORRES, 435 U.S. 1, AT 4, note 6
- SHAPIRO VS. THOMPSON, 394 U.S. 618 (1969)
- CALIFANO VS. AZNAVORIAN, 439 U.S. 170, AT 176 (1978)
Look the above citations up in American Jurisprudence.
Some citations may be paraphrased.

ANNOUNCEMENT: JOIN "EXO" & MR. "J" FROM STAGE2OMEGA TONIGHT ON THE FRANK26/KTFA CONFERENCE CALL AT 7:00 PM EST

ANNOUNCEMENT: JOIN "EXO" & MR. "J" FROM STAGE2OMEGA TONIGHT ON THE FRANK26/KTFA CONFERENCE CALL AT 7:00 PM EST WE WILL BE DOING THE GLOBAL RELEASE OF THE RADIATION PROTECTION TEAM'S PRODUCTS & DEVICES TO PROTECT YOU AND YOUR FAMILY FROM RADIATION WWW.RADIATIONPROTECTIONTEAM.COM DIAL IN NUMBER (760) 569-7676 PIN: 156996# WE ARE CURRENTLY LOOKING FOR THE FOLLOWING 1. CHANNEL PARTNERS 2. NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION 3. GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION PARTNERS 4. ENTITIES LOOKING AT PRIVATE LABELS 5. WHOLESALE PARTNERS Visit stage2omega at: http://www.stage2omega.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network To control which emails you receive on stage2omega, click here

loechin live update

Subject: Fw: loechin live update

Dear Ken, Hey Guys, here we sit another week well almost and still the RV alludes us. It has become somewhat of a joke with me at times. There is much I could say but it's better left not said. There has been lawsuits ( which I doubted ), meetings in Sweden, a goat in Baravia lol, planes train and automobiles.... The bottom line is this after all the junk we have seen, and heard, and even the stuff we haven't we are now finally in the moment of our Blessing. It's been a difficult time trying to find the truth as of late. However as always the truth comes out in the end, and we finally can see it. I hope some of us can get together and write a tell all book about all the lies we have been told and who told them. The rates are still in the lower $20's for the IQD, and the dong may be about to hit the $4.00 range. As soon as the email is sent to me we will do an email blast ASAP and give you the 800 numbers. Remember you have two minutes once you cal l to make your appointment. Tell them how much currency you have on hand and also what you have in reserve. At your appointment walk in there like you own the World ( maybe we will ) remember you have thirty minutes for you first appointment. Another time I believe will be set up for your reserves. Most of all keep your exchange amount to yourself and for the love of pete keep your mouth shut lol. We will still be here doing calls with Wealth Managers after the RV for you to ask questions and so forth. Keep the Faith guys we really are at the end and guess what WE WIN ...

CGI's Lymerick: SAS’s lamping unit 'used laser to dazzle Princess Diana's driver'

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

CGI's Lymerick: SAS’s lamping unit 'used laser to dazzle Princess Diana's driver'

Posted By: Susoni [Send E-Mail]
Date: Monday, 16-Sep-2013 15:09:58

By: Donal MacIntyre Published: Sun, September 15, 2013 A MAN-MADE “lightning bolt” was used by an SAS group nicknamed the Lamping Unit to kill Princess Diana, it is claimed. Following Soldier N’s claims of an SAS plot, other military sources allege a secret force existed and it had the ability to carry out an operation to kill the Princess. The elite Army detachment was able to kill by shining high density beams called “dazzler lasers” into the eyes of targets. These either cause road accidents or disorientate victims so they could be killed in another way. Normally, the licence to kill has to be authorised by the Foreign Secretary, under a Class Seven Authorisation, but fresh military sources say in this case it came from deeper within the intelligence establishment. The Diana allegations surfaced in July after the court martial of Danny Nightingale, another SAS veteran who was convicted of illegal possession of a weapon and ammunition. The claims were passed to the Royal Military Police and then to Scotland Yard which has interviewed the wife and mother-in-law of Soldier N in connection with the Diana murder claims. Allegations that Diana died after the driver of her Mercedes, Henri Paul, was “lamped” by an SAS unit on a motorcycle in a Paris underpass in 1997, causing the car to plough into a wall, are supported by witness evidence. Another driver in the underpass described seeing in his rear-view mirror a “major white flash” which illuminated the Mercedes moments before the fatal accident. Francois Levistre claimed that a motorcycle pulled up to the car and directed a light into the vehicle before it crashed. He told the official inquest in 2007 that it was like night turning to day, adding: “I just wondered what happened because the light was like you were caught in a police radar. “The light even came into my car,” said Mr Levistre. “The light was not directed towards me. It was directed towards the car which was behind. “When I saw the light, I looked into the mirror. I saw the car going from left to right to left again to get within the pillar. The car had no light any longer. Everything was switched off.” His evidence was disregarded as insignificant at the inquest and subsequent inquiry into the Princess’s death. However, added to current developments, and with previous testimony from former MI6 spy Richard Tomlinson, it is gaining credibility by the day. Tomlinson said that the same technique was considered for use in the Balkans for an MI6 plot to assassinate the Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic. Tomlinson has been dubbed a rogue spy but many of his claims have been substantiated in public hearings, including the confirmation that MI6 had a “licence to kill”. This is given out under what is known as Class Seven Authorisation by the Foreign Secretary, as confirmed by Sir Richard Dearlove, the former head of MI6, who testified on oath at the inquest. A Human Rights Watch report on “dazzlers” in 1998 says: “In the case of an electro-optical device, the laser would work in the same way a driver’s night vision is overwhelmed by bright headlights.” http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/429536/EXCLUSIVE-SAS-s-lamping-unit-used-laser-to-dazzle-Princess-Diana-s-driver

Letter from Field McConnell to Vladimir Putin

-16-2013 Letter from Field McConnell to Vladimir Putin

Posted By: NaturalWisdom
Date: Monday, 16-Sep-2013 13:32:06

Key points of Field's letter are excerpted below. A Russian version can be viewed via the link. 9-16-2013 Letter from Field McConnell to Vladimir Putin Dear Brother in Christ Vladimir Putin, I graduated from Annapolis, served as a pilot in the Marine Corps, later served as an interceptor pilot for North American Aerospace Defense Command where, ostensibly, my opponents could have been bombers or fighters from the USSR. Concurrent to my service flying F4 and F16 fighters in a component of the Air Force, I flew 29 years for Northwest Airlines. When I became aware of the illegal droning of airliners built by Airbus, Boeing, Bombardier and Embraer I immediately shared this information with the Airline Pilots Association, Federal Aviation Administration and Federal Bureau of Investigation. I filed three Civil Cases the last of which was Civil Case 1:08-1600 (RMC) which was dismissed in January, 2011 in a Fraud Upon The Court. Meanwhile, in my service as a loyal oath keeper to God and country, a private informal intel organization – Abel Danger-- involving thousands of contributors was formed and named with respect to an aborted Pentagon-DIA program which later proved accurate in identifying key perpetrator-patsies of 9/11. In my pursuit of justice regarding aviation safety I became aware of treasons and misprisions of treason involving John McCain, John Kerry, John Boehner, seven state governors and three female bureaucrats one of whom is my only sibling. In May, 2012, I communicated with your office regarding the intentional take down of the Sukhoi Superjet demonstration flight in Indonesia. Abel Danger’s current research indicates that Serco’s United Kingdom Ministry of Defence clients used bogus network time protocols for a man-in-the-middle attack on the Sukhoi Superjet’s FADEC and patent-pool devices in the hope that a fatal crash would eliminate a competitor to Bombardier’s CRJ aircraft. On Friday, 6 September, 2013 I again contacted your office regarding the False Flag attack for which John McCain was clamoring. In my letter of 6 September I offered a CRISP remedy and in the week following, the McCain-Obama-Kerry efforts were rebuffed byU. S.citizens in a show of disfavor with a margin of 499 opposed to 1 in favor. Syria has taken no acts of aggression against the United States and both the American voters and the American military have indicated intolerance for the military actions contemplated by McCain, Kerry, Obama and Graham who seem intent on suppressing the truth of Benghazi. It was during this time that you, President Putin, demonstrated true statesmanship. It was your brokered agreement with President Assad which vacated any rationale for an open and unwarranted attack on the nation of Syria. I offer, as a private citizen, to support any international effort to expose the true nature of the False Flag attack upon America on 11 September, 2001, which was deployed to cause the American public to support a series of wars against sovereign nations which refused to be bullied by Central Bankers. I further offer to work with Sukhoi and Russiato expose the technologies that enabled the destruction of the Sukhoi Superjet. Those same technologies enabled the losses of AA11, AA77, UA175, UA93, Colgan 3407, Air France 447, Adam Air 574, Kenya Airways 507, Turkish 1951, Speedbird 38 and Air Afrikiyah 771, amongst others... Field McConnell U.S. Marine http://bit.ly/1bn6xfA

On the Grand Jury

On the Grand Jury
Fully Informed Jury Association
Post Office Box 5570 Helena, MT 59604-5570 1-800-TEL-JURY www.fija.org
The U.S. Attorneys Manual states that prosecutors “must recognize that the grand jury is an independent body, whose functions include not only the investigation of crime and the initiation of criminal prosecution but also the protection of the citizenry from unfounded criminal charges” (USAM, Section 9-11.010). The Manual recognizes that targets of investigations have the right and can “request or demand the opportunity to tell the grand jury their side of the story” (USAM, Section 9-11.152).
The Supreme Court states that the independent grand jury’s purpose is not only to investigate possible criminal conduct, but to act as a “protector of citizens against arbitrary and oppressive governmental action,” and to perform its functions, the independent grand jury “deliberates in secret and may determine alone the course of its inquiry” (United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338 (1974)). An independent grand jury is to “stand between the prosecutor and the accused,” and to determine whether a charge is legitimate, or is “dictated by malice or personal ill will” (Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906)). The grand jury is to protect citizens against “hasty, malicious and oppressive persecution” and to insure that prosecutions are not “dictated by an intimidating power or by malice and personal ill will” (Wood v. Georgia, 370 U.S. 375 (1962)). The independent grand jury is described as “a body with powers of investigation and inquisition, the scope of whose inquiries is not to be limited narrowly by questions of propriety or forecasts of the probable result of the investigation” (Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972)). “Without thorough and effective investigation, the grand jury would be unable either to ferret out crimes deserving of prosecution, or to screen out charges not warranting prosecution.” (U.S. v. Sells Engineering, 463 U.S. 418 (1983))
Here are some comments from a person who was brought up for indictment: “Obviously a grand jury could not fulfill its duties if it is only allowed to hear evidence which the government chooses to let it hear. Therefore, while I would be more than happy to answer any questions that you or members of the grand jury may have, and while I have no intention of engaging in a prolonged, unlimited monologue, there is additional information which must be provided to the grand jury in order for the members thereof to thoroughly perform their Constitutional duties. I trust that you, the prosecutor, will not attempt to censor me, or suppress such information from being seen by the grand jury, when I am testifying.” The grand jury refused to indict her after hearing her testimony, by the way.
Find out if there is a sign-up sheet to volunteer to get on grand juries in your county, state, and federal jurisdictions. Sign up if you can! It is the best way to put a lid on out-of-control government prosecutions. If you are serving on a grand jury, you have the authority and the duty to call in the person or persons being accused, to dismiss the prosecutor and government employees from the room, and to question and hear from the person the prosecutor wants to charge. You have the duty to ensure that no person is brought to trial unless there is obvious and sufficient evidence to return an indictment. As a grand juror, you are the first line of defense for private citizens against ambitious prosecutors and unconstitutional laws being used against The People.
Our founders intended that our independent grand juries protect people from ambitious or tyrannical government employees and laws. You, as a grand juror, stand as the first bulwark against government tyranny. While you must protect us all from dangerous people who harm others, you must always be aware that your first job is to protect harmless people from unfair, unjust and unreasonable government laws. When laws encroach on private individual rights, you cannot be required to enforce them by returning an indictment. When you refuse to indict harmless people, you help to protect us all, you included, from out-of-control government actions. As an independent grand jury, you also have the right to initiate your own investigations on evidence presented to you, and to indict anyone if you feel they are guilty of wrongdoing, including those government employees and elected officials who are not upholding an oath of public office.
FIJA/AJI Document name and order #: On the Grand Jury: OTGJ#1 August 15, 2010

snopes.com: President Obama's 923 Executive Orders

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/executiveorders.asp

PapaBear Chat posted by Landons Nana at I4U Mon.AM

PapaBear Chat posted by Landons Nana at I4U Mon.AM

09/16/2013

6 Comments

[Papa Bear] GM   Dinar Family Many of you have been listening to more rumors out of Reno .My and emails were rather HOT. MY advice STAY THE COURSE. MY word for today came in a small chapel sanctuary in our church Sunday before services. Its a little longer than normal but you will understand . Ephesians 6 : 1-24. Stand strong in the turbulence

[Papa Bear] I am so happy   Summers withdrew his name and look at the Syrian situation with thoughts of progress.

Papa Bear] We are already hearing rumblings on gov. running out of $ on Oct 1. Ask yourself WHY we have to go through this again. We are a nation and must pay our debts.

[cain321] Papa Bear: I appreciate your post. It blessed me to know we will understand about our wait

[Papa Bear] We are continuously being hit by folks trying to scam our Dinar Family and that will not stop .Keep your thinking cap on and use discernment
....
Read More link on Right

[Vote4RV] Papa Bear hey I am curious as to where we are in dinarland. We have been so close and things were supposed to be signed and delivered. Doesn't this delay of further processing mean all those time sensitive agreements will have to be re done?

[Papa Bear] Vote4RV Things continue to move forward appropriately . Appears now Yellin will be appointed which was my wish. Many wonderful things are being done behind that curtain for us.

[Papa Bear] It looks like the stock mkts and other mkts agreed with your carebear doesnt it?

[dinardiamonds] Who is Yellin?

[Papa Bear] dinardiamonds One of the 2 major candidates for BB job .By the way FOMC meeting Tues and WED.

[oublood] Papa Bear dinardiamonds and appointed for what ?

[OKCRN] oublood Janet Yellen....head of the Federal Reserve....

[Papa Bear] Ears burning from weekend but Forest fires put out and READY TO ROCK AND ROLL FOR THE NEW WEEK

[operadinar] Papa Bear It's been very quiet in the castle mostly. Folks curious and doing our best to stay encouraged.

[Papa Bear] Wasn't quiet in my neck of the woods

[Waiting] Papa Bear - still got your Rebel flag flying??

[Papa Bear] Waiting Yep told you NO PROBLEM HERE. TAKE DOWN TODAY. 2 weeks before AL

[Waiting] Hahaha

[Waiting] Lots of happy people in Oxford. Papa Bear!!

[operadinar] Papa Bear Some have reported that folks calling the banks is holding up the RV. Aren't we way passed that point?

[Papa Bear] People need to stop calling and going to banks until instructed to do so on the Dinar

[sandytob] Papa Bear GM. I was wondering what you thought of the Zap post.

[Papa Bear] sandytob Always good .A little confusing at times unless you know what he is talking about. Poof talked more in riddles and sometimes I have trouble . Zaps better about that.

[owl] Papa Bear do feel info guys are "being quiet" or simply there is nothing to 'share'...? <---Reason for quiet weekend?

[Papa Bear] owl Plenty going on but no need to broadcast

http://www.dinarrecaps.com/1/post/2013/09/papabear-chat-posted-by-landons-nana-at-i4u-monam.html

Fulford says NO to troops in Syria and RV is a scam

From: Fulford Benjamin <benjaminfulford@hotmail.com>
To: wtynan.brown <wtynan.brown@att.net>
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 2:01 AM
Subject: RE: moving troops to syria

The story from my sources is that there are only a few troops in Jordan and no plans for troops in Syria.
The Dinar revaluation is a Bush/Clinton scam so don't fall for it.

Benjamin Fulford 古歩道ベンジャミン 090-3439-5558

Why Japan's new home run king forebodes the biggest default in history

Subject: Why Japan's new home run king forebodes the biggest default in history

If you are having trouble viewing this email, or you'd like to share this article with your friends, click here September 16, 2013 Tokyo, Japan Suicide has long played a bizarre role in Japanese culture. In feudal Japan, for example, dishonored samurai would often commit seppuku, a suicide ritual that involved ceremonial disembowelment. It was torturous pain lasting for hours. In World War II, the Japanese military churned out suicide attackers known as the kamikaze that routinely antagonized allied warships in the Pacific. And of course, citizens in Hiroshima and Nagasaki simply went back into their homes and waited to become burnt toast despite ample warnings from the US military. Even after the Fukishima disaster, TEPCO employees went rushing back into deadly levels of radiation exposure in what could only be characterized as a suicide mission. Despite the obvious prospect of certain death, the Japanese collective still did what was expected of them by the state. Even if it meant roasting alive under a mushroom cloud. This fierce commitment to the nation has often been abused by the Japanese government which disposed of its people like kindling. It's the same today. Looking purely at the numbers, Japan's medium-term fundamentals are among the bleakest in the world. Total government debt amounts to over 200% of the country's entire GDP-- a figure so large that the Japanese government spends 51.5% of the 43 trillion yen ($430 billion) they collect in tax revenue just to pay interest! Perhaps even more astounding is that 'primary balance expenses,' i.e. normal government expenditures, totaled 70.3 trillion yen, or 163% of tax revenue. The only way they've managed to stay afloat is by issuing more debt, which makes the problem even worse. In fact, 46% of the 2013 budget is being financed by debt. These guys are running out of rope. And fast. The government is trying to 'fix' this by appealing to Japanese people's sense of national pride to get them to buy more government bonds. Needless to say, this is like a modern-day economic kamikaze-- letting the people commit financial suicide for the good of the state. And perhaps decades ago, this tactic may have worked. But not today. Times are changing, and people aren't willing to lay down like they used to. Here's an interesting example-- Japan is a baseball obsessed nation. They love the game. And their equivalent of Babe Ruth is a player named Sadaharu Oh who retired in 1980. Oh is a national hero for hitting 55 home runs in a single season, a record which stood for decades. This season, a foreign player named Wladimir Balentien started challenging Oh's record. And as he got close, many Japanese pitchers in the Nippon league refused to even throw to him in an effort to preserve Oh's record and mystique. But then something changed. There was a shift in mentality, and suddenly all the players started giving Balentien a fair shot at the record. They quit putting national pride first, and just played the game. Balentien broke the record yesterday and is now, officially, the Home Run King of Japan. This may seem like a minor footnote. But in Japan, it's a major shift... suggesting that Japanese people are no longer willing to lay down for the sake of the national pride, let alone the government. You can see this shift in the bond market; individuals and pension funds alike are reducing their purchases of Japanese government bonds... which begs the question: If the government is financing 46% of its budget with debt, but fewer and fewer people are willing to buy this debt, then how will they be able to keep the party going? They won't. It's simple arithmetic. The only ways out for them are default and a currency crisis-- the biggest in history. This would affect financial markets, banks, and the entire global financial system in a profound way. Given the magnitude of this impact, and as close as they are to the end, this is simply not a trend that anyone can afford to ignore. Until tomorrow, Simon Black Senior Editor, SovereignMan.com Where is the best place to bank in the world? This is the most common question that Sovereign Man: Confidential members have. Followed by "Where should I establish residency and move to?" The answers of course depend on each specific situation, but in this month's issue we set ourselves a monumental task of analyzing and identifying the best set of options that would suit just about anybody. This month's seminal issue of SMC includes: A detailed analysis of respective banking systems of selected jurisdictions. We look at things like central bank capitalization, central government debt levels, commercial bank capitalization, and commercial bank liquidity. All this is broken down to identify which is the safest bank and the safest currency in the world, which jurisdictions are best for corporate banking, where the risk and reward ratios are favorable etc. Everything summarized for you in a user-friendly cheat sheet. The best residency and immigration options in the world. Find out which are the two best places to establish residency with a view of obtaining a second passport-- without the need of actually moving there. What are the best and easiest passports to acquire if you actually want to uproot your life and move to a new place. All in a systematic overview, designed to give you a direction immediately. A boots on the ground account from Iceland. The country was the first victim of the financial collapse of 2008. It's still in a very poor state, with a default and a significant restructuring inevitable. But it also has a lot going for it. That's why I'm so excited about its potential once it's forced to pull out all the stops and attract foreign capital. The opportunities for those prepared will be immense. It should definitely be on your radar. An extended set of questions, ranging from what to look for when setting up an offshore corporate bank account to the best deals for farmland in the world right now. To get immediate access to the knowledge contained within this month's issue, and all the back issues, click here to get the full details on your invitation to join Sovereign Man: Confidential today. Follow Sovereign Man Facebook Twitter Google+