The Clinton Foundation Larceny
Share147 Tweet59 Share0 Share280
The New York Times, in what Rush Limbaugh
calls a “random act of journalism,” published an article exposing The Clinton
Foundation’s larceny. The Times reports that despite having lost tens of
millions of dollars since its shady inception, the Clintons will be moving
ahead, full throttle, relocating the Foundation’s “nerve center” from its current,
highly publicized and politically correct site in Harlem to mid-Manhattan,
central to liberal media outlets.
In the
process, the name of the Foundation is being changed from “The Clinton
Foundation” to “The Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation.” Well, at
least that appellation is more honest.
The
Clinton family has been a blight visited upon the nation since a boozy,
blustering, Slick Willy clambered out of Arkansas, grabbing the public’s eye,
along with every female he could reach, and the presidency.
England’s Telegraph
reports that Slick Willy met with attorneys and advisors over a year
ago. Rather than progress having been made they
“concluded
that (the Foundation) was a mess… But what complicated this review – what made
its findings more politically devastating – is that the Clinton Foundation has
become about more than just Bill. Now both daughter Chelsea and wife, and
likely presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton have taken on major roles.”
The New
York Times went further: “For all
of its successes, the Clinton Foundation had become a sprawling concern,
supervised by a rotating board of old Clinton hands, vulnerable to distraction
and threatened by conflicts of interest. It ran multimillion-dollar deficits
for several years, despite vast amounts of money flowing in.”
Not surprisingly, The Times is tens of millions of dollars short and
almost two decades late. Their hesitant evaluation is incorrect. The Foundation
wasn’t “threatened by conflicts of interest”; it is steeped in conflicts of
interest. Nor has there been any success beyond swelling the Clintons’ coffers
and the public’s acceptance of characteristic liberal bleating about good
intentions.
The Times catalogues The Clinton Foundation’s commitment to cronyism and
corruption over decades. Despite Bill’s ceaseless fundraising, money has
disappeared like rain on the Sahara. The Telegraph cites The
New York Times, then adds its own conclusion: “‘efforts to insulate the
foundation from potential conflicts have highlighted just how difficult it can
be to disentangle the Clintons’ charity work from Mr. Clinton’s moneymaking
ventures and Mrs. Clinton’s political future.’ Oh, they're entangled alright.”
And now
there’s going to be a new hand on the pirate ship’s helm; once situated in more
fashionable, midtown digs Hillary and her staff are moving in. The mission of
the Foundation is morphing from its previous, AIDS-poverty-obesity-relieving
intention, to reflect a Hillary-driven agenda. According to FOX News,
Hillary “reportedly will focus on new initiatives covering women, jobs and
other areas.” If this sounds like a campaign platform to you, your
discriminatory skills are on target.
We’re told
ceaselessly that Hillary is “the smartest woman in America.” One wonders how
Medgar Evans’ family feels about that.[1]
Rate this
(5 Votes)
Notes:
1.
“In a speech that
denounced Voter ID efforts, Clinton referred to Medgar Evers as ‘Medger Evans’
while discussing how one of her mentors defused a volatile situation in
Mississippi after Evers, who courageously organized voter registration efforts
in the South, was assassinated.” [↩]
Sponsored
From Around the WebNew Rule in Arizona:(SEP 2013):
If You Pay For Car Insurance You Better Read This... 7 Secrets To Keep Your
Family SafeYour family is in danger. Learn the 7 Secrets before it's too late! Get A Girlfriend NowFree video
shows how to "Make Her Your Girlfriend" 7 odd
veggies that KILL abdominal fatSurprising foods that boost your metabolism for
a flat stomach Controversy
Over New Steroid AlternativeRare plant boosts muscle growth over 700% - LEGAL
In US...
Tagged
with
Bill
Clinton Edgar Evers Hillary Clinton Manhattan
Medgar Evans new
york times The Clinton Foundation
1.
JohnGalt
says:
"The Clinton
Foundation Larceny"
#######
Why the redundancy?
The deeply soiled name
"Clinton" is wholly synonymous with "Larceny".
The oily, perjurious,
unaccomplished, habitually corrupt Clintons, commit statist power-enabled
felonies as reflexively as honest Americans breathe.
300
Rate this
o Marilyn
says:
It is worthy of note
because The NYT has jumped on the "destroy Hillary" bandwagon. We all
know they are low-life thieves and in competent boobs but why the formerly
sycophantic Times has decided to, however gingerly, poke them with a pitch fork
is interesting, don't you think? Think The Lyin' King is pulling some of his
typical, Chicago thug antics to make life difficult for a 2016 run, perhaps?
90
Rate this
2.
jp
says:
The Clinton name is
synonymous with hatred for our military also. God help us if she runs and wins.
250
Rate this
3.
Rocky
says:
In my opinion, Bill and
Hill should move back to Little Rock and retire. Bill can work in his
Presidential Library and Massage Parlor and Hillary on her book.
181
Rate this
4.
allen
goldberg says:
Hillary the smartest
woman in America? No even close..On her very worst day...Condi Rice's bowel
movements are smarter!! As are many many others...Hillary maybe the most
politically nasty, vile woman in america..but nothing more.
270
Rate this
Got a dollar sez that
her mini-series neglects to mention her flunking the New York State bar exam.
Lib-progs are
excruciatingly smart. They just aren't very good test takers.
130
Rate this
§ HMathis
says:
Or that Hillary was
fired from the Watergate investigation for lying and unethical behavior!
90
Rate this
o Rattlerjake
says:
You have to admit the
clintons and the rest of the Washington libturds have perfected theft, fraud,
self-indulgence, arrogance, immorality, and treason!
180
Rate this
5.
Mary
Triola says:
Why are people
surprised? The Clintons have been surrounded by scandal for years. So now
suddenly the NYT is writing this. If these so called journalists weren't so
busy sucking up to all the wrong people this would have been reported long ago.
Bubba will always be Bubba. Hillary is a fraud. What did she do as senator?
What did she do as Secretary.So why now is he changing the name. It is sad this
is what our political system has become. We have the Alinskyites running OUR
government. If you remember good old Hillary did her thesis on this radical. To
quote Mark Levin Hillary is obama in a dress. Bubba has bribed people Hillary
has bribed people. Their good friend Vince killed himself. Theses people are
criminals it's that simple. How did little georgie porgie get his job with abc?
These people never fade away. They are vain and need all the attention all the
time.
80
Rate this
o Richard
says:
According to a few
reports, Vince Foster did not kill himself, look it up.
50
Rate this
o Marulyn
says:
Levin is right.
But the surprise issue
is just the point. No one is surprised except the Times. And they aren't,
really, either. They're just trying to defuse the scandal before 2016 and,
possibly, doing a mild hit piece on her at the behest of the Thug In Chief. Oh,
yes; part of the (unfortunately) ongoing, incredibly tiresome saga of Clinton
reruns is that it is still an open question of whether or not their "good
friend" Vince killed himself; their "good friends" have the
convenient habit of kicking the bucket before any inconvenient skeletons can be
aired out of the Clinton closet.
One of the funniest and
least talked about facts of Hillary's totally useless history (she's gotten
nowhere except riding on the coattails of men, something she claims to deride)
is that she started her political life as a devout Republican, working for
Goldwater. She is a virulent joke and one that the libs can't wait to carry
around on their shoulders...and saddle on our backs.
10
Rate this
Let's take the lady who
was directly responsible for security in Benghazi and make her responsible for
the security of the whole friggin' country.
What could go wrong?
230
Rate this
o Chuckster
says:
They got 214 million
last year in donations and come up 8 million short, so someone spent 222
million last year, hmmmmm can they show us where they spent it? And the dumb
azz people of this country will probably elect this twit to run America .
160
Rate this
§ Rachel
Guess says:
Chuckster,
Any non-profit is
required by law to disclose both it's revenues and expenditures. Go to http://www.guidestar.org and create an account (it's free of charge) and you can look up
the last three year's of tax returns for any non-profit organization.
30
Rate this
o george
cullen says:
SING IT BROTHER
30
Rate this
7.
AWKingsley
says:
Actually Sarah Palin
just proved she is the smartest woman in America: Sarah just announced her
support for Rand Paul.
60
Rate this
8.
EPJ
says:
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT
MAKE NOW ANYWAY?
61
Rate this
9.
Walter
Luffman says:
I'd like to think the
only problem is that the money is being "laundered" to make Bill,
Hillary and Chelsea rich. Yeah, I'd like to think that; but somehow I think
there's even more than that involved here. Is a big chunk of money going to
others, perhaps outside America, who don't have our country's best interests at
heart? Don't know, but I wonder.
100
Rate this
10.
BillWhit
says:
Hitlery is supposed to
be the Smartest Woman in America? Not even close, but she is the Most Corrupt
and DisHonest Woman in America, right up there with the Skanky Sasquatch,
Michelle Obama, which she has proven that over and over! No, the Skank of Bengazi
needs to Retire and spend the rest of her days, unless convicted over her Lying
over Bengazi, at her favorite Bull Dyke Bar in Arkansas!
70
Rate this
11.
david
says:
Remember all this, and
more come election time. Actually, she should not be permitted to get that far.
If only half of what has
been reported in past years is true regarding the clinton's, she should be
barred from running. Period.
But I can hear the
liberals and socialists and the news media screaming about the past using these
words:
"What Difference
Dose It Make?"
Press 1 for America;
Press 1 for Paul!
00
Rate this
12.
Bill
says:
Probably would be
investigated and found illegal if we had a REAL justice department.
20
Rate this
13.
Alcan
says:
After years of practice
in the art of corruption, both in the Ark. governor's house, followed by a
successful run in the WH, why is anybody surprised that there are problems with
the Clinton Foundation. But, not to worry, I'm sure that the Chinese will be more
than happy to send over boatloads of money to help get another crooked Clinton
into the White House. After all, the first one paid off extremely well for
them, with Bill approving one of his buddies, Loral, to provide assistance in
improving their missile control systems, followed by thousands of pages of top
secret military information at the end of his term. Plus, who knows what else
they got as a result of Chinagate.
00
Rate this
14.
A
Patriot says:
What larceny? It's their
foundation, idiots give them money and they take it, give it to their friends,
or flush it down a toilet. What conflict of interest are you so concerned
about. They are all lying thieves, so what? Is there any taxpayer money involved?
Any bribery, extortion, or other corruption of government officials involved?
This is a pure BS article spinning a tale going nowhere. There is no law with
the Clintons or the scum in white house.
00
Rate this
o Marilyn
says:
It is larceny because it
is categorized by them as a non-profit, not "their" foundation.
Non-profits have strict rules and operating a non-profit at a loss is criminal.
Like everything else these thieves do. Taxpayer money is involved.
00
Rate this
o Pete0097
says:
People donate to the
Foundation so they can buy the Clintons support. IT is a great idea. I wish I
could do it. A lot of people on both sides have done it. I get e-mails from
them all time. Some are from conservatives wanting to fight the liberals and some
are from liberals wanting to fight the conservatives. All the same, they just
want money.
No comments:
Post a Comment