The IMF Just Confirmed The Nightmare Scenario For Central Banks Is Now In Play

The IMF Just Confirmed The Nightmare Scenario For Central Banks Is Now In Play

It's all downhill from here

by Zero Hedge | September 5, 2015 

The most important piece of news announced today was also, as usually happens, the most underreported: it had nothing to do with US jobs, with the Fed’s hiking intentions, with China, or even the ongoing “1998-style” carnage in emerging markets. Instead, it was the admission by ECB governing council member Ewald Nowotny that what we said about the ECB hitting a supply brick wall, was right. Specifically, earlier today Bloomberg quoted the Austrian central banker that the ECB asset-backed securities purchasing program “hasn’t been as successful as we’d hoped.“
Why? “It’s simply because they are running out. There are simply too few of these structured products out there.”
So six months later, the ECB begrudgingly admitted what we said in March 2015, in “A Complete Preview Of Q€ — And Why It Will Fail“, was correct. Namely this:

… the ECB is monetizing over half of gross issuance (and more than twice net issuance) and a cool 12% of eurozone GDP. The latter figure there could easily rise if GDP contracts and Q€ is expanded, a scenario which should certainly not be ruled out given Europe’s fragile economic situation and expectations for the ECB to remain accommodative for the foreseeable future. In fact, the market is already talking about the likelihood that the program will be expanded/extended.
 
… while we hate to beat a dead horse, the sheer lunacy of a bond buying program that is only constrained by the fact that there simply aren’t enough bonds to buy, cannot possibly be overstated. 
 
Among the program’s many inherent absurdities are the glaring disparity between the size of the program and the amount of net euro fixed income issuance and the more nuanced fact that the effects of previous ECB easing efforts virtually ensure that Q€ cannot succeed. 

(Actually, we said all of the above first all the way back in 2012, but that’s irrelevant.)
So aside from the ECB officially admitting that it has become supply*constrained even with security prices at near all time highs, why is this so critical?
Readers will recall that just yesterday we explained why “Suddenly The Bank Of Japan Has An Unexpected Problem On Its Hands” in which we quoted BofA a rates strategist who said that “now that GPIF’s selling has finished, the focus will be on who else is going to sell. Unless Japan Post Bank sells JGBs, the BOJ won’t be able to continue its monetary stimulus operations.”
We also said this:

“in 6-9 months, following the next major market swoon when everyone is demanding more action from the BOJ, “suddenly” pundits will have discovered the biggest glitch in the ongoing QE monetization regime, namely that the BOJ simply can not continue its current QE program, let along boost QE as many are increasingly demanding, unless it finds willing sellers, and having already bought everything the single biggest holder of JGBs, the GPIF, had to sell, the BOJ will next shakedown the Post Bank, whose sales of JPY45 trillion in JGBs are critical to keep Japan’s QQE going.
 
The sale of that amount, however, by the second largest holder of JGBs, will only last the BOJ for the next 3 months. What next? Which other pension fund will have the massive holdings required to keep the BOJ’s going not only in 2016 but also 2017 and onward. The answer: less and less.

Once again to be accurate, the first time we warned about the biggest nightmare on deck for the BOJ (and ECB, and Fed, and every other monetizing central bank) was back in October 2014, when we cautioned that the biggest rish was a lack of monetizable supply.
We cited Takuji Okubo, chief economist at Japan Macro Advisors in Tokyo, who said that at the scale of its current debt monetization, the BOJ could end up owning half of the JGB market by as early as in 2018. He added that “The BOJ is basically declaring that Japan will need to fix its long-term problems by 2018, or risk becoming a failed nation.”
 


This was our summary:

The BOJ will not boost QE, and if anything will have no choice but to start tapering it down – just like the Fed did when its interventions created the current illiquidity in the US govt market – especially since liquidity in the Japanese government market is now non-existant and getting worse by the day. All that would take for a massive VaR shock scenario to play out in Japan is one exogenous JGB event for the market to realize just how little actual natural buyers and sellers exist.

That said, our conclusion, which was not to “expect the media to grasp the profound implications of this analysis not only for the BOJ but for all other central banks: we expect this to be summer of 2016’s business” may have been a tad premature.
The reason: overnight the IMF released a working paper written by Serkan Arslanalp and Dennis Botman (which was originally authored in August), which confirmed everything we said yesterday… and then some.
Here is Bloomberg’s summary of the paper:

The Bank of Japan may need to reduce the pace of its bond purchases in a few years due to a shortage of sellers, said economists at the International Monetary Fund.
 
There is likely to be a “minimum” level of demand for Japanese government bonds from banks, pension funds, and insurance companies due to collateral needs, asset allocation targets, and asset-liability management requirements, said IMF economists Serkan Arslanalp and Dennis Botman.

Here are the excerpts from the paper:

We construct a realistic rebalancing scenario, which suggests that the BoJ may need to taper its JGB purchases in 2017 or 2018, given collateral needs of banks, asset-liability management constraints of insurers, and announced asset allocation targets of major pension funds.
 
… there is likely to be a “minimum” level of demand for JGBs from banks, pension funds, and insurance companies due to collateral needs, asset allocation targets, and asset-liability management (ALM) requirements. As such, the sustainability of the BoJ’s current pace of JGB purchases may become an issue.

Back to Bloomberg:

While Governor Haruhiko Kuroda said in May that he expects no obstacles in buying government bonds, the IMF analysts join Nomura Securities Co. and BNP Paribas SA in questioning the sustainability of the unprecedented debt purchases.

Who in turn merely joined Zero Hedge who warned about precisely this in October of last year.
Back to the IMF paper, which notes that in Japan, where there is a limited securitization market, the only “high quality collateral” assets are JGBs, and as a result of the large scale JGB purchases by the JGB, “a supply-demand imbalance can emerge, which could limit the central bank’s ability to achieve its monetary base targets. Such limits may already be reflected in exceptionally low (and sometimes negative) yields on JGBs, amid a large negative term premium, and signs of reduced JGB market liquidity.”

To the extent markets anticipate limits, the rise in inflation expectations could be contained, which may mitigate incentives for portfolio rebalancing and create a self-fulfilling cycle that undermines the BoJ’s objectives.

For those surprised by the IMF’s stark warning and curious how it is possible that the BOJ could have put itself in such a position, here is the explanation:

So far, the BoJ’s share of the government bond market is similar to those of the Federal Reserve and still below the Bank of England (BOE) at the height of their QE programs. Indeed, the BoE held close to 40 percent of the conventional gilt market at one point without causing significant market impairment. Japan is not there yet, as the BoJ held about a quarter of the market at end-2014. But, at the current pace, it will hold about 40 percent of the market by end-2016 and close to 60 percent by end-2018. In other words, beyond 2016, the BoJ’s dominant position in the government bond market will be unprecedented among major advanced economies.

As we expanded yesterday, the biggest issue for the BOJ is not that it has problems buying paper, but that there are simply not enough sellers: “under QQE1, only around 5 percent of BoJ’s net JGB purchases from the market came from institutional investors. In contrast, under QQE2, close to 40 percent of net purchases have come from institutional investors between October 2014 and March 2015.”
 

 
This is where things get back for the BOJ, because now that the BOJ is buying everything official institutions have to sell, the countdown has begun:

given the pace of BoJ purchases under QQE2 and projected debt issuance by the government (based on April 2015 IMF WEO projections of the fiscal deficit), we estimate that Japanese investors could shed some ¥220 trillion of JGBs until end-2018 (Table 2, Figure 4). In particular, Japanese insurance companies and pension funds could reduce their government bond holdings by ¥44 trillion, while banks could sell another ¥176 trillion by end-2018, which would bring their JGB holdings down to 5 percent of total assets. At that point, the BoJ may have to taper its JGB purchases.

 
Then there are the liquidity issues:

As the BoJ ascends to being a dominant player in the JGB market, liquidity is likely to be affected, implying that economic surprises may trigger larger volatility in JGB yields with potential financial stability implications. As noted in IMF (2012), demand-supply imbalances in safe assets could lead to deteriorating collateral quality in funding markets, more short-term volatility jumps, herding, and cliff effects. In an environment of persistent low interest rates and heightened financial market uncertainty, these imbalances can raise the frequency of volatility spikes and potentially lead to large swings in asset prices.

This, too, is precisely what we warned yesterday would be the outcome: “the BOJ will not boost QE, and if anything will have no choice but to start tapering it down – just like the Fed did when its interventions created the current illiquidity in the US govt market – especially since liquidity in the Japanese government market is now non-existant and getting worse by the day.”
The IMF paper conveniently provides some useful trackers to observe just how bad JGB liquidity is in real-time.



The IMF is quick to note that the BOJ does have a way out: it can simply shift its monetization to longer-dated paper, expand collateral availability using tthe BOJ’s Securited Lending Facility (which basically is a circular check kiting scheme, where the BOJ lends banks the securities it will then repurchase from them), or simply shift from bonds to other assets: “the authorities could expand the purchase of private assets. At the moment, Japan has a relatively limited corporate bond market (text chart). Hence, this would require jumpstarting the securitization market for mortgages and bank loans to small and medium-sized enterprises which could generate more private assets for BoJ purchases.”
But the biggest risk is not what else the BOJ could monetize – surely the Japanese government can always create “monetizable” kitchen sinks… but what happens when the regime shifts from the current buying phase to its inverse:

As this limit approaches and once the BoJ starts to exit, the market could move from a situation of shortage to one with excess supply. The term premium could jump depending on whether the BoJ shrinks its balance sheet and on the fiscal deficit over the medium term.

When considering that by 2018 the BOJ market will have become the world’s most illiquid (as the BOJ will hold 60% or more of all issues), the IMF’s final warning is that “such a change in market conditions could trigger the potential for abrupt jumps in yields.”
At that moment the BOJ will finally lose control. In other words, the long-overdue Kyle Bass scenario will finally take place in about 2-3 years, tops.
But ignoring the endgame for Japan, and recall that BofA triangulated just this when it said that “the BOJ is basically declaring that Japan will need to fix its long-term problems by 2018, or risk becoming a failed nation“, what’s worse for Abe is that the countdown until his program loses all credibility has begun.
What happens then? As BNP wrote in an August 28-dated report, “Once foreign investors lose faith in Abenomics, foreign outflows are likely to trigger a Japanese equities meltdown similar to the one observed during 2007-09.”
And from there, the contagion will spread to the entire world, whose central banks incidentally, will be faced with precisely the same question: who will be responsible for the next round of monetization and desperately kicking the can one more time.
But before we get to the QE endgame, we first need to get the interim point: the one where first the markets and then the media realizes that the BOJ – the one central banks whose bank monetization is keeping the world’s asset levels afloat now that the ECB has admitted it is having “problems” finding sellers – will have no choice but to taper, with all the associated downstream effects on domestic and global asset prices.
It’s all downhill from there, and not just for Japan but all other “safe collateral” monetizing central banks, which explains the real reason the Fed is in a rush to hike: so it can at least engage in some more QE when every other central bank fails.
But there’s no rush: remember to give the market and the media the usual 6-9 month head start to grasp the significance of all of the above.
Source: IMF

http://www.infowars.com/the-imf-just-confirmed-the-nightmare-scenario-for-central-banks-is-now-in-play/
 

Dow registers another triple-digit loss

Dow registers another triple-digit loss

Growing fears of interest-rate hike before end of year

Published: 6 hours ago

Jerome R. Corsi

 

NEW YORK – The Dow Jones Industrial Average continued its roller-coaster ride, ending Friday with yet another triple-digit loss, closing down 272.38 points, or 1.66 percent, at 16,102.38.

This time what drove the stock market down was not fears over China’s stock market crashing, but, ironically, a better-than-expected unemployment report. Investors interpreted the report as evidence for the argument the U.S. economy is strengthening, making it more likely that the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates at the upcoming Federal Open Market Meeting scheduled for Sept. 17-18.

The Dow’s negative turn Friday dimmed investors’ hopes that a rally earlier this week meant global markets were stabilizing after a selloff triggered by China’s decision Aug. 11 to devalue the yuan by 3 percent.
Now, what looms over the three-day Labor Day weekend is concern that investors wanting to cut losses will flood the market with sell orders when trading resumes, causing a “Black Tuesday.”
Get Dave Ramsey’s practical financial plan for your family, “Total Money Makeover: A Proven Plan for Financial Fitness,” at the WND Superstore!
On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported total non-farm payroll employment increased by 173,000 in August, reducing the unemployment rate to 5.1 percent, the lowest level since 2008.
The widely followed financial blog ZeroHedge.com characterized the jobs data as “good enough,” noting the Bureau of Labor Statistics report “sparked a stock slump as September rate hike odds jumped.” It observed that following the “headlines” positive payroll report, the probability of a Fed decision to hike interest rates in September – as measured by futures contracts on Federal Funds, the interest rate at which depository institutions lend balances to each other overnight – jumped up to 34 percent, with a rate hike in December now considered 60 percent likely.
Had the jobs report lagged behind analysts’ expectations, the stock market Friday most likely would have continued the Wednesday and Thursday rally, with investors concluding the odds of a rate hike would have lowered.
An interest-rate hike likely would dampen economic growth, suggesting to the Federal Reserve that a rate hike now would not be necessary, because a slowing economy would be unlikely to generate the 2 percent inflation the Fed fears.
For consumers, the stock market selloff Friday and the growing conviction on Wall Street that interest rates will go up before the end of the year suggests the economy may be re-entering the prolonged recession that began at the end of George W. Bush’s second term in office.
Rising interest rates will increase the cost to consumers of finance charges, causing increased monthly mortgage payments on Adjustable Rate Mortgages, or ARMs, plus higher monthly payments to finance a wide range of purchases from automobiles to washing machines.
Record 94 million not working but not ‘unemployed’
The perception that the economy may be strengthening enough to cause inflation seems unrealistic in view of the Bureau of Labor Statistics report on Friday that a record 94 million Americans are not in the labor force.
Labor force participation remained at 62.6 percent, a 38-year low, dating back to 1977, when the rate dropped to 62.4 percent.
Those not in the labor force are not considered “unemployed,” according to BLS statistical methodologies, because the “unemployed” are considered to be still looking for work, but unable to find it. Meanwhile, those “out of the labor force” are those who have become so discouraged with trying to find a job that they have given up looking for work.
Adding the 8.162 million the BLS considers “unemployed” to the 93,707 million it considers “not in the labor force” amounts to 101,869 million Americans who were not working in August 2015.
The BLS report Friday also found that 56.253 million women, ages 16 and older, were not participating in the workforce in August.

Click here for reuse options!

Copyright 2015 WND

http://www.wnd.com/2015/09/dow-registers-another-triple-digit-loss/

 

Powder keg! Texas community leader: Attack anti-cop activists

Powder keg! Texas community leader: Attack anti-cop activists

'We're looking at videos ... and we're going to hunt you sons of [expletive] down'

Published: 10 hours ago

Douglas Ernst

The racial powder keg is so dangerous in East Texas that a local community leader is threatening to attack black activists who protest law enforcement personnel.

“You’d better run and you’d better hide, because we’re looking at videos, we’re looking, pulling names and addresses and we’re going to hunt you sons of [expletive] down,” said Nathan Ener in a video posted briefly online, the Houston Chronicle reported Thursday.
The violent rhetoric came less than one week after Harris County Sheriff’s Deputy Darren Goforth, 47, was executed while filling up his vehicle at a gas station. Prosecutors say suspect Shannon Miles, 30, shot the officer 15 times on Aug. 28. He plans to plead not guilty to capital murder.
Ener, who worked for the Texas Department of Criminal Justice until 1999, made similar statements in 2014. His critics call him a white supremacist.
“Get you some [expletive] rocks and when they come out in that street we’ll give you a few minutes to pepper their [expletive],” his said at a protest with local activist Quanell X, the newspaper reported. “You light them up like they’ll have mumps or measles when they go home with all the bumps and knots all over.”
Ener’s rant took place just three days before officer Goforth’s funeral. Memorial services were held Friday at Second Baptist Church in Harris County, NBC News reported.
“The Evidence Bible” is now available and includes, besides the King James version, dozens of articles expanding answers to questions such as why is there suffering, explanations about what Muslims believe and scientific facts written millennia before man discovered them.
“We’re here to honor the family. We’re to honor Deputy Goforth’s wife and children,” said visiting officer Rod Carroll, assistant chief of the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office, NBC reported. The gas station where Goforth was gunned down was also visited by roughly 1,000 people who left flowers and cards.
“My husband was a police officer for 30 years. He’s retired now. I know what it’s like to kiss somebody every day or every night and send them out, not knowing what they are going to encounter,” said Houston-area resident Libby Hodges, NBC reported. She held a sign that said “Our hearts are bleeding blue.”

http://www.wnd.com/2015/09/east-texas-community-leader-attack-anti-police-activists/

 

Godfather Rahm Proposes A Half $Billion Tax Increase For Chicago....

Godfather Rahm Proposes A Half $Billion Tax Increase For Chicago....

Posted By: Watchman
Date: Friday, 4-Sep-2015 22:36:34

(CHICAGO) There were no disruptions Thursday night during the last of Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s three town hall meetings on next year’s Chicago city budget, but there wasn’t time for much else, either.

Seventy people spoke in 100 minutes during the meeting, at Wright College in the Dunning neighborhood on the Northwest Side. Those who couldn’t be succinct were cut off before they had a chance to make their point; but plenty did so, mostly airing a variety of complaints.

A handful of people voiced outrage about a proposal to fill most of next year’s budget gap through a $500 million property tax hike.

“You raise the taxes, you’ll see a mass exodus of people getting the hell out of this goddamn city,” one man shouted.

Earlier in the day, the mayor defended his push for a major property tax hike, acknowledging it would be a tough pill to swallow for taxpayers, but saying it’s necessary to shore up police and firefighter pension funds, restore the city’s worst-in-the-nation bond rating, and solve the city’s long-standing financial crisis.

“This will be, obviously, difficult. And I don’t underestimate the difficulty. That’s why it’s going to be done in the most fair and progressive manner,” the mayor said.

The tax increase would mean the average owner of a home valued at $250,000 would pay an extra $500 a year in property taxes.

The property tax hike was not the only source of anger for those who attended Thursday’s town hall meeting. Special education teachers and students protested Board of Education budget and staffing cuts.

Only a handful of speakers mentioned the Dyett High School controversy, which predominated at the first two hearings, although special education teacher Sarah Chambers told the mayor, “What that tells me is that the black students of Chicago can shuck and jive for the city of Chicago, but they can’t create green technology innovation.”

Earlier Thursday, Emanuel announced an art-based solution. Hunger striking parents have demanded a science-based school and vowed to continue their strike.

A handful of 38th Ward residents voiced objections to O’Hare International Airport’s new flight patterns, calling on Emanuel to relent and allow diagonal runways to remain in operation. Several speakers said said the sharply-increased taxes and fees expected to be in the 2016 budget would force them to move out of the city.

Speaker Paul Hermann commiserated, saying, “I’m here to tell you, Mister Mayor, that I don’t envy you your job.”

A few even offered money-raising ideas. One man, a city retiree, suggested using tax increment financing to build a plant that would bottle and sell Chicago tap water.

“It’s worth more than gasoline right now,” he said.

Emanuel addressed several specific questions and comments, but did not make a general statement on the budget. He delivers his 2016 budget address on Sept. 22.

http://govtslaves.info/godfather-proposes-largest-tax-increase-in-modern-chicago-history/

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=26886

Attempts to end a California drought by artificial means is not a new development, as noted by this account of rainmaker Charles Hatfield

Attempts to end a California drought by artificial means is not a new development, as noted by this account of rainmaker Charles Hatfield

Posted By: NaturalWisdom
Date: Friday, 4-Sep-2015 17:17:21

Hatfield the Rainmaker
By Thomas W. Patterson
http://bit.ly/1EFOIs6

The Journal of San Diego History
SAN DIEGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY QUARTERLY
Winter 1970, Volume 16, Number 4
Linda Freischlag, Editorial Assistant

[snip]

Oh Mister Hatfield, you've been good to us:
You've made it rain in ways promiscuous!
From Saugus down to San Diego's Bay
They bless you for the rains of yesterday.
But Mister Hatfield, listen now;
Make us this vow:
Oh, please, kind sir, don't let it rain on Monday!

And other doings full of fun and glee
For New Year's Day are planned abundantly
From Saugus down to San Diego's Bay
And they will bless you on tomorrow's day,
Great moistener, if you will listen now
And make this vow:
Oh, please, kind sir, don't let it rain on Monday!*

* At the conclusion of the drouth-ridden year 1904 the citizens of the Los Angeles area, who had raised money to hire him, were sing­ing praises of the rainmaker Charley Hatfield, their savior. He had achieved success. The rains had come—and come—and come. As the New Year approached, however, an ugly thought crept into the minds of some o/ the populace. What if Charley Hatfield made it rain on the day of that stupendous event, the Tournament of Roses Parade? This anon­ymous piece of doggerel, appealing to him for charity on Monday, January 2, the date of the parade, appeared in several newspapers. Evidently the plea was heard. Although it rained earlier in the day and still sprinkled where Charley was working five miles from the parade, no rain fell during the procession.

I. WHOSE DISCIPLE?

The best remembered facts about Hatfield The Rainmaker are that when he ministered to the sky it rained tor­rents and when he tried to collect $10,000 from the City of San Diego the mayor and council welshed.

There will always be room for a query: Was the rain really a coinci­dence? Did he really believe what he claimed, or was he a fellow with a knowing wink?

Some wrote delightedly that he was a scoundrel. Others, especially David Starr Jordan, wrote as though they thought him a cruel fraud against whom the public needed protection.

Nobody ever got behind his mask, and, in fact it may never have been a mask. The actual record of Hatfield's activities explodes some commonly held truths, but the strangest facts and coincidences persist. The record makes no real headway against the legend.

Charles Mallory Hatfield got into the public's attention when the Los Angeles Times on February 2, 1904, misspelling his name, said:

Charles Hadfield, expert rain manufacturer, has been sent out by a number of South Spring Street merchants to bring down the recreant showers. For the consideration of $50 Hadfield has planted his instruments in the foothill district near Pasadena and with a new process of chemical evaporation promises abundant moisture in five days. The magician holds himself responsible for the abundant rain in San Diego County late last spring, and says he has tried 17 times, scoring only one fail­ure. Barnett & Gude, H. E. Memory, H. G. Ackley and others stand sponsor to this com­mander of nature.

It was no credulous account, but rain­makers were a discredited lot. They had had their vogue in the Midwest in the 1880's and 1890's. The ancient world had known a theory that noxious fumes, such as the stench of bodies after a major battle, caused rain. After artil­lery became a significant part of war, Benvenuto Cellini wrote of explosions causing rain. This theory lasted several centuries and explained, to the satisfac­tion of some, the storm that handicapped the Spanish Armada and the mud at Waterloo. It was Americanized after the Civil War by a man named Edward Powers,who wrote War and The Weather contending that most of the Civil War battles caused rain. Then there was a belief that prairie fires caused rain and that the Chicago fire drenched itself, although tardily.

Congress, pressed by influential senators who owned Western land and hoped there might be something to it, spent over $20,000 testing the explosion theory by some spectacular Texas balloon busting and cannonading, supervised by a flamboyant character named Robert St. George Dyrenforth. The explosion theory faded out after that, but the fume theory returned. A whole school of rainmakers practiced in the Midwest, each with a secret formula.

The biggest names among the fume men were those of Frank Melbourne, known as the Australian Wizard, and G. B. Jewell, who operated originally under auspices of the Rock Island Rail­road and practiced from a specially equipped boxcar. These men never oper­ated in California, but in 1899 one of Jewell's disciples sought a rainmaking contract at Pasadena. In 1900 another persuaded a group of San Diegans to pay the cost of sending aloft the fumes of zinc dissolved in sulphuric acid, and this was described as the great Jewell's secret formula.

There had been three terrible years of drouth at the end of the century, drying up irrigation canals in the Central Valley and leaving Southern California as brown in winter as in summer. Now, in January 1904, no rain had fallen since early December and precious little since the previous spring. Matters were so bad that Catholic and Protestant churches appealed through the newspapers for a day of prayer for rain on Sunday, January 31.

In the brown Los Angeles hinterland no one was far removed from the tra­ditional grazing economy. Jotham Bixby, the big cattleman of Long Beach, com­plained in the public prints: "This is the first time since 1872 that we have not had any green grass at this time of year." Those who looked far ahead were talking, quietly as yet, about a prepos­terously long aqueduct from Owens River Valley, but for the present there was water in the city mains, as far as they reached.

Hatfield set up shop two days after the day of prayer. In another two days there was rain in the northern part of the state, but forecaster George E. Franklin of the Los Angeles office of the U. S. Weather Bureau predicted there would be none for Los Angeles. He was wrong. At 6 o'clock that evening it started raining heavily, continuing off and on for the rest of the night and most of the following week. It rained well over an inch downtown, more in the foothills.

Franklin explained that it was the tail-end of the Northern California storm that had come over the Tehachapi. Still there was the coincidence that it had followed quickly after Hatfield's pre­sumed activity.

The newspapers had almost forgotten the prayers as a possible cause. All of them saw fit to mention Hatfield and his manipulations, but the Herald left no bases uncovered, saying:

In answer to the prayers of the church, as a result of Rainmaker Hatfield's manipulation or from natural causes, rain began falling last evening...

FULL REPORT

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=26863

Putin Admits Russian Military Support for Syrian Army

Putin Admits Russian Military Support for Syrian Army

Troops and equipment sent to help al-Assad fight against proxy war

by Kurt Nimmo | Infowars.com | September 4, 2015

Vladimir Putin admitted on Friday during an economic forum in Vladivostok his country is providing Bashar al-Assad’s military with weapons and training.
The Russian president said it was “premature” to talk about direct military support for the Syrian army but said Russia is “already giving Syria quite serious help with equipment and training soldiers, with our weapons,” RIA Novosti reported.
Putin added his government has not ruled out direct military support in the future.
He said supplies sent to Syria fulfill contracts dating back five to seven years.
Russia has a naval facility in Tartus, Syria, on the Mediterranean. In November, 2011 a Russian flotilla led by the aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov visited Tartus to show support for the al-Assad government at the outbreak hostilities between the government and US and Gulf Emirate supported mercenaries.
On Thursday the Obama administration indicated it is monitoring reports that Russia is conducting military operations in Syria. The White House said any attempt by Russia to support the Syrian government would be “destabilizing and counter-productive.”
On Wednesday state television in Damascus ran video footage of what appears to be Russian armored vehicles supporting Syrian troops fighting anti-Assad mercenaries in Latakia.
Mercenary groups also posted images to social media they said showed Russian jets and drones operating over the Idlib province.

Behind the Anti-ISIS Rhetoric

During remarks Friday Putin said Russia would like to “create some kind of an international coalition to fight terrorism and extremism” and added to that “end, we hold consultations with our American partners.”
He said he had “personally spoken on the issue with US President Obama.”
Last September, however, the Russian Foreign Minister, Sergey Lavrov, said the United States is presenting a “two-faced stance” and a “double standard” in the supposed war against ISIS in Syria.
Evidence reveals jihadi terrorist groups in Syria are supported by the United States, a coalition of Gulf Emirate states led by Saudi Arabia, and Turkey.
Over the last two years the distinction between “moderate” mercenary groups fighting to overthrow al-Assad and extremist groups such as al-Nusra and ISIS has all but disappeared.
“Nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a secular fighting force to speak of,” The New York Times reported in April 2013.
In May a declassified US Defense Intelligence Agency document from 2012 revealed the United States and its partners supported the Islamic State and planned to establish a Salafist principality in Syria.
According to investigative reporter Nafeez Ahmed, the “leaked document reveals that in coordination with the Gulf states and Turkey, the West intentionally sponsored violent Islamist groups to destabilize Assad, despite anticipating that doing so could lead to the emergence of an ‘Islamic State’ in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).”
As Tim Anderson notes, cooperation between so-called “moderate” groups and ISIS is predicated on destroying “a common enemy in Syria: ‘the Nussayri regime,’ a sectarian way of referring to supposedly apostate Muslims,” namely the Shia Alawites that ruled the country prior to the mercenary war.
Many Syrians view the US coalition ostensibly devised to combat ISIS in Syria as a ruse to take out al-Assad. Russia has also said it believes airstrikes aimed at ISIS are designed to overthrow the government.
Russia’s involvement in Syria is an effort to help the government of al-Assad defend itself against the increasingly brutal proxy war pursued by the United States and its partners, although Russia has not explicitly stated this is the case.
While the push for a no-fly zone in Syria enforced by the United States has lost momentum over the last few weeks, on Friday the largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization in the US, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, joined the Syrian American Council and other groups in calling for one “to protect civilians from ongoing aerial attacks.”
If the US and its partners eventually establish a no-fly zone in Syria, Russian aircraft supporting Syrian military operations would ultimately be targeted and the proxy war in Syria may escalate into a shooting war between the United States and Russia. 

http://www.infowars.com/putin-admits-russian-military-support-for-syrian-army/

Saudi King rents out entire Four Seasons in D.C.

Saudi King rents out entire Four Seasons in D.C.

'Gold mirrors, gold end tables ... even gold hat racks'

Published: 8 hours ago

 

Douglas Ernst

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Saudi King Salman

It’s good to be the king — of Saudi Arabia.

The entire Four Seasons hotel in Washington, D.C., has been rented out for King Salman bin Abdulaziz’s first visit to America.
The Middle East leader is in town to speak with President Obama about the Iranian nuclear deal and other issues related to the region.

Abdulaziz landed in the nation’s capital Thursday night, where a monstrous fleet of black luxury cars awaited him at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland.


“Everything is gold. Gold mirrors, gold end tables, gold lamps, even gold hat racks,” a source told Politico.
The website reported that red carpets were used in the parking garage to make sure the king and his family never touched the concrete.
A representative for the Four Seasons declined to comment on Politico’s story.
In “Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance,” renowned activist Pamela Geller provides the answer, offering proven, practical guidance on how freedom lovers can stop jihadist initiatives in local communities.
Although American presidents are not nearly as extravagant as the royal family, the Obama administration has spent tens-of-millions of taxpayer dollars on vacations, fundraisers and trips. Records gleaned and analyzed by the government watchdog Judicial Watch in May 2014 concluded that the White House accrued at least $33,441,728.23 in such expenditures.
The nonprofit organization also reported that Obama’s 17-day vacation in Hawaii cost taxpayers roughly $4 million in staff and security needs.

Click here for reuse options!

Copyright 2015 WND

 

http://www.wnd.com/2015/09/saudi-king-rents-out-entire-four-seasons-in-d-c/ 

 

Victims Of Vaccine Damage Speak Out

Victims Of Vaccine Damage Speak Out

Callers discuss personal stories regarding damage caused by vaccines

by Infowars.com | September 4, 2015 

Infowars Nightly News Director Rob Dew takes calls from everyday Americans who reveal their vaccine horror stories.

http://www.infowars.com/victims-of-vaccine-damage-speakout/

YOUR UPDATED LEGAL RIGHTS PROTECTED BY LAW! FORWARDED BY ERASMUS OF AMERICA - SEPTEMBER 3, 2015

YOUR UPDATED LEGAL RIGHTS PROTECTED BY LAW! FORWARDED BY ERASMUS OF AMERICA - SEPTEMBER 3, 2015

YOUR UPDATED LEGAL RIGHTS PROTECTED BY LAW! FORWARDED BY ERASMUS OF AMERICA - COPYRIGHTED 2015. MAY BE REPRINTED AND COPIED IF PRINTED IN FULL. - NIFI, P.O. BOX 1465, SENECA, SC 29679 . WWW.FASTBOOMAMERICANECONOMY.COM FASTBOOMAMERICANECONOMY.COM@GMAIL.COM

 

     LEGAL NOTE FOR LAWYERS WHO DEPEND TOO STRONGLY ON CASE LAW INSTEAD OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION NEED TO BE REMINDED THAT JUDGES BOTH FEDERAL AND STATE ARE SWORN TO UPHOLD THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, NOT CASE LAW.

     "THIS CONSTITUTION, AND THE LAWS MADE IN PURSUANCE THEREOF, SHALL BE THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND; AND THE JUDGES IN EVERY STATE SHALL BE BOUND THEREBY, ANY THING IN THE CONSTITUTION OR LAWS OF ANY STATE TO THE CONTRARY NOTWITHSTANDING...AND ALL OFFICERS BOTH OF THE UNITED STATES AND OF THE SEVERAL STATES SHALL BE BOUND BY OATH TO SUPPORT THIS CONSTITUTION." - ARTICLE 6, U.S. CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES

     THE PREAMBLE TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION STATES WRITTEN BY AUTHORITY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  

     THE PREAMBLE TO THE U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION ADDED LATER IS STATING THAT THE FOLLOWING U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS  ADDED BY RATIFICATION OF THEIR ADDITION TO THE  U.S. CONSTITUTION ARE HIGHER LEGAL AUTHORITY THAN THE REST OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION IF CONFLICT IN STATED AUTHORITY OCCURS BETWEEN THESE TWO PARTS OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. THE PREAMBLE TO THE U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS AS WRITTEN BY THE U.S. CONGRESS INCLUDES SUPERIOR AUTHORITY OF 10 U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS OVER REST OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.  THIS LEGAL SECTION SHOWN: 

   

     THESE PRINCIPLES COME FROM AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE WITH SUPPORT FROM CASES FAR TOO NUMEROUS TO LIST IN THIS REPORT COVERING AUTHORITY OF THE PEOPLE AND ARTICLE 1 SECTION 10: 1. NO PUBLIC POLICY OF A STATE CAN BE ALLOWED TO OVERRIDE THE POSITIVE GUARANTIES OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION. (16 AMJUR 2ND., 70) 2. NO EMERGENCY CAN JUSTIFY THE VIOLATION OF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF OUR UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. (16 AMJUR 2ND, 71)  3. NEITHER ANY EMERGENCY NOR ECONOMIC NECESSITY JUSTIFIES A DISREGARD OF CARDINAL CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTIES. (16 AMJUR 2ND, 81) 4. ANY ATTEMPT TO DO THINGS WHICH ARE PRESCRIBED IN THE CONSTITUTION IN ANY MANNER OTHER THAN THAT PRESCRIBED (FOR EXAMPLE OBAMA WITH INVALID EXECUTIVE ORDERS!), OR TO DO THAT WHICH IS PROHIBITED IS REPUGNANT TO THAT SUPREME, PARAMOUNT LAW AND IS INVALID (OBAMA AGAIN WITH EXECUTIVE ORDERS NOT AUTHORIZED BY THE CONSTITUTION) (16 AMJUR 2ND), 82)

     AS CHARLES RIELY ONCE STATED, "IT WILL NOT BE THE LAWYERS, POLITICIANS OR BUREAUCRATS WHO SAVE AMERICA. IT WILL BE THE PEOPLE WHO WORK WITH THEIR HANDS. HOUSEWIVES, TRUCKERS, CARPENTERS, AND FARMERS WILL TURN THIS COUNTRY AROUND." AND OTHER CATEGORIES OF AMERICANS NOT LISTED BY HIM CAN BE ADDED TO THIS LIST OF THE AMERICANS WHO CAN AND SHOULD SAVE AMERICA AS THE PROFESSIONAL CAREER LEADERS IN WASH., D.C. APPARENTLY ARE A LOST CAUSE TO SAVE AMERICA AT THIS TIME! THEY SHADOW BOX WITH ISSUES THAT MUST BE FACED AND RESPONSIBLY SOLVED NOW, NOT IGNORED UNTIL AMERICA IS RUINED BY THESE PROBLEMS CREATED BUT NOT SOLVED BY THE CURRENT LEADERS IN WASH., D.C.

     I LIKE THE LEGAL INTEGRITY SHOWN BY THE QUOTE BELOW OF JUSTICE HUGO BLACK, IN COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY'S CHARPENTIER LECTURES, 1968: "THE PUBLIC WELFARE DEMANDS THAT CONSTITUTIONAL CASES MUST BE DECIDED ACCORDING TO THE TERMS OF OUR CONSTITUTION ITSELF, AND NOT ACCORDING TO JUDGES' VIEWS OF FAIRNESS, REASONABLENESS, OR JUSTICE. I HAVE NO FEAR OF CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS PROPERLY ADOPTED, BUT I DO FEAR THE REWRITING OF THE CONSTITUTION BY JUDGES UNDER THE GUISE OF INTERPRETATION."

     MY CONCEPT OF THE STANDARD BY WHICH ANY FORM OF GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE JUDGED IS WHETHER IT DOES A GOOD JOB OF MANAGING THE RESOURCES OF THE NATION WELL, BOOMING THE ECONOMY, AND MAINTAINING THE GOD-GIVEN FREEDOM AND LEGAL RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE OF THE NATION. LAWS CAN BE USED FOR GOOD OR EVIL DEPENDING ON THE MOTIVES OF THE LEADERS USING LAWS IN THE NATION.

     THE U.S. SUPREME COURT HAS RULED THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OR OFFICIALS OR EMPLOYEES CAN BE LIABLE FOR FINANCIAL DAMAGES TO THE INNOCENT AMERICAN CITIZEN THAT THEY HAVE WRONGED. FOR EXAMPLE: "THE INNOCENT INDIVIDUAL WHO IS HARMED BY AN ABUSE OF GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY IS ASSURED THAT HE WILL BE COMPENSATED FOR HIS INJURY." - OWEN VS. CITY OF INDEPENDENCE, 100 S. CT. 1398 (1980)

      NOW IS A HANDY LISTING OF MANY LEGAL RIGHTS WHICH ARE PROTECTED BY TECHNICAL LAW AT THIS TIME. KEEP THIS LIST FOR YOUR REFERENCE AND ADD OTHER DECISIONS, ETC. WHICH SHOW YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED BY LAW WHEN YOU ASSERT YOURSELF LEGALLY WHEN JUSTIFIED.

     "PEOPLE OF A STATE ARE ENTITLED TO ALL RIGHTS WHICH FORMERLY BELONGED TO THE KING BY HIS PREROGATIVE." LANSING V SMITH, (1829) 4 WEND. 9, 20. PREROGATIVE MEANS "EXCLUSIVE RIGHT: A DISTINCTIVELY SUPERIOR ADVANTAGE."

     "IT IS TRUE THAT AT (ENGLISH) COMMON LAW THE DUTY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WAS TO REPRESENT THE KING, HE BEING THE EMBODIMENT OF THE STATE. BUT UNDER THE DEMOCRATIC FORM OF GOVERNMENT NOW PREVAILING THE PEOPLE ARE KING SO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S DUTIES ARE TO THAT SOVEREIGN RATHER THAN TO THE MACHINERY OF GOVERNMENT." HANCOCK V. TERRY ELKHORN MINING CO., INC., KY., 503 S.W. 2D 710. KY. CONST. SECTION 4. COMMONWEALTH EX REL. HANCOCK V. PAXTON, KY., 516 S.W. 2D. PG. 867 (2) CL 3.

     UNDER OUR FORM OF GOVERNMENT, THE LEGISLATURE IS NOT SUPREME. IT IS ONLY ONE OF THE ORGANS OF THE ABSOLUTE SOVEREIGNTY WHICH RESIDES IN THE WHOLE BODY OF THE PEOPLE; LIKE OTHER BODIES OF THE GOVERNMENT (AGENCIES AND COURTS!), IT CAN ONLY EXERCISE SUCH POWERS AS HAVE BEEN DELEGATED TO IT, AND WHEN IT STEPS BEYOND THAT BOUNDARY, ITS ACTS...ARE UTTERY VOID." - BILLINGS V. HALL. 7 CA. 1

     "OUR GOVERNMENT IS FOUNDED UPON COMPACT. SOVEREIGNTY WAS, AND IS, IN THE PEOPLE."  GLASS V. THE SLOOP BETSY, 3 DALL 6

     "IT IS THE DOCTRINE OF THE COMMON LAW, THAT THE SOVEREIGN (AMERICAN CITIZEN) CANNOT BE SUED IN HIS OWN COURT WITHOUT HIS CONSENT(BY TERMS OF THE COMPACT CALLED THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS ADDED TO THE RETAINED ENGLISH COMMON LAW AS THE NATIONAL LAW OF AMERICA BEYOND AUTHORITY OF CONGRESS, COURTS, OR AGENCIES TO IGNORE, DISOBEY, AMEND BY THEIR AUTHORITY, OR TERMINATE IN AUTHORITY). THE SIREN VS. US. 74 U.S. 152

     "STATE GOVERNMENTS ARE BUT TRUSTEES ACTING UNDER A DERIVED AUTHORITY (OF THE PEOPLE)..." 4 WHEAT, 402

     "WHILE SOVEREIGN POWERS ARE DELEGATED TO THE AGENCIES OF GOVERNMENT, SOVEREIGNTY ITSELF REMAINS WITH THE PEOPLE, BY WHOM AND FOR WHOM, ALL GOVERNMENT EXISTS AND ACTS." YICK WO VS. HOPKINS AND WOO LEE VS. HOPKINS 118 U.S. 356

     THOSE IN GOVERNMENT POSITIONS WHETHER FEDERAL OR STATE LEGISLATURES, COURTS, OR OTHER AGENCIES WHO REFUSE TO LEGALLY RESPECT AND UPHOLD THE RETAINED ENGLISH COMMON LAW RIGHTS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, RIGHTS PROTECTED BY THE U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS FROM LEGAL ATTACK OR INTERFERENCE OR DENIAL OF PRACTICE IN AMERICA, AND STATUTE CIVIL RIGHTS GRANTED IN ADDITION TO THESE PERMANENT LEGAL RIGHTS WHICH NO GOVERNMENT IN AUTHORITY CAN TAKE AWAY FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, ANY GOVERNMENT AGENT OR SOURCE ENGAGING IN SUCH LEGALLY VOID ACTION OR POLICY IS LEGALLY GUILTY OF DERELICTION OF LEGAL DUTY, MALFEASANCE IN OFFICE, PERJURY OF THEIR OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO UPHOLD THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND ATTACHED U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS AS THE BINDING NATIONAL LAW OVER AMERICA, AND ALSO GUILTY OF TECHNICAL LEGAL VIOLATION OF TREASON AGAINST THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE III, SECTION 3 IN WAGING LEGAL WARFARE AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND THEIR LEGAL RIGHTS AND IN ADHERING TO THE ENEMIES OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHO WANT THE U.S. CONSTITUTION OVERTHROWN BY INTERNAL COUP WITHIN GOVERNMENT (FEDERAL OR STATE) IN AMERICA. LET THE FOLLOWING NOW LEGALLY WARN THOSE OF ANY LEGAL CAPACITY WHO MAY CONSPIRE OR ACTIVELY ENGAGE IN ATTEMPTED LEGAL VIOLATION OR SUPPRESSION OF ANY LEGAL RIGHTS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BEYOND THE DELEGATED AUTHORITY GIVEN TO GOVERNMENT BY THE ABSOLUTE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHO ARE THE MASTER TO ALL LEGAL AUTHORITY AND NOT SERVANTS TO WOULD-BE LEGAL USURPERS WHO WISH TO OVERTHROW THE LEGAL AUTHORITY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE OVER ALL GOVERNMENT INCLUDING COURTS IN AMERICA.

     "THE UNITED STATES ADOPTED THE COMMON LAWS OF ENGLAND WITH THE CONSTITUTION." CALDWELL V. HILL 176 S.E. 383 (1934)

     "LAW OF THE LAND MEANS THE COMMON LAW." TAYLOR V. PORTER 4 hill. 140, STATE V. SIMON, 2 SPEARS, 761, 767

     42 U.S.C. 1983 - "EVERY PERSON WHO, UNDER COLOR OF ANY STATUTE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION, CUSTOM OR USAGE OF ANY STATE...SUBJECTS, OR CAUSES TO BE SUBJECTED ANY CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES...TO THE DEPRIVATION OF ANY RIGHTS, PRIVILEGES, OR IMMUNITIES SECURED BY THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS, SHALL BE LIABLE TO THE PARTY INJURED IN AN ACTION AT LAW, SUIT IN EQUITY, OR OTHER PROPER PROCEEDINGS FOR REDRESS."

     WEBSTER DEFINES A REPUBLIC AS: "...A STATE OR NATION IN WHICH THE SUPREME POWER RESTS IN THE BODY OF CITIZENS..." 

     "ALL LAWS WHICH ARE REPUGNANT TO THE CONSTITUTION  ARE NULL AND VOID." - MARBURY VS. MADISON 5 U.S. 137, 174, 176

     "NO ONE IS BOUND TO OBEY AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND NO COURTS ARE BOUND TO ENFORCE IT."  16 AM JUR 2D SECTION 177, LATE AM JUR 2D SECTION 256

     "ALL PERSONS ARE PRESUMED TO KNOW THE LAW. IF ANY PERSON ACTS UNDER ANY UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATUTE, HE DOES SO AT HIS OWN PERIL. HE MUST TAKE THE CONSEQUENCES." 16 AM JUR 177, 178

     SEARCH AND SEIZURE MANUAL FOR LAW OFFICERS, PAGE 16: "THE LOSS OF EVIDENCE ISN'T THE ONLY BAD CONSEQUENCE OF AN OFFICER'S ERROR IN SEARCH AND SEIZURE. THE OFFICER MAY ALSO BE PROSECUTED BY THE US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR DEPRIVING THE CITIZEN OF HIS RIGHTS AND MAY BE SUED IN THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT. JURIES HAVE AWARDED CITIZENS UP TO $250,000.OO FOR UNLAWFUL SEARCHES AND SEIZURES. THIS MEANS THAT THE OFFICER MAY BE LAYING HIS HOUSE, CAR AND SAVINGS ACCOUNT ON THE LINE WHEN ENGAGING IN UNWARRANTED SEARCHES AND SEIZURES."

     18 USC, CRIMINAL CODE, SECTION 241 CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS OF CITIZENS: "IF TWO OR MORE PERSONS CONSPIRE TO INJURE, OPPRESS, THREATEN OR INTIMIDATE ANY CITIZEN IN THE FREE EXERCISE OR ENJOYMENT OF ANY RIGHT OR PRIVILEGE SECURED TO HIM BY THE CONSTITUTION OR LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES, OR BECAUSE OF HIS HAVING SO EXERCISED THE SAME;...THEY SHALL BE FINED NOT MORE THAN $10,000 OR IMPRISONED NOT MORE THAN FIVE YEARS OR BOTH." NOTHING HERE STATES THAT IRS AGENTS, FBI AGENTS, STATE POLICE, ETC. ARE EXEMPT FROM THIS FEDERAL CRIMINAL LAW!

     SUPREME COURT: BIVENS V. SIX UNKNOWN AGENTS, 403 US 388, 29 LED2D 619, 91 SCT 1999 (1990): WHEN A GOVERNMENT AGENT ACTS IN AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL MANNER THE AGENT AS OF THEN BECOMES PERSONALLY LIABLE FOR MONETARY DAMAGES.

     STOKWITZ V. US: TAXPAYER ALLEGING UNLAWFUL SEIZURE AND SUBSEQUENT USE OF ACQUIRED TAX INFORMATION CAN THEN PURSUE LEGAL REMEDY THROUGH A BIVENS SUIT OR OTHER TORT ACTION.

     HOLLINGSHEAD V. UNITED STATES 85-2 USTC 9772 (5TH CIR. 1985), RULED, 26 IRC SEC. 7421 IS A WAIVER OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY BY THE GOVERNMENT FOR A CITIZEN NOW CLAIMING THAT HIS OR HER PROPERTY HAS BEEN SUBJECTED TO A WRONGFUL LEVY.

     SUPREME COURT: BLACKLEDGE V. PERRY, 417 US 21, 40 LED 2D 628, 94 SCT 2098 (1974), GUAM V. DERGURGUR, 800 F2D 1470 (9TH CIR. 1986): IT IS AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL DEPRIVATION OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW WHEN THE GOVERNMENT PENALIZES A CITIZEN MERELY BECAUSE HE OR SHE HAS EXERCISED ANY PROTECTED STATUTORY OR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT.

     IN BOTHKE V. FLOUR ENGINEERS, 713 F, 2D 1405 (1993) THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS RULED THAT, WHEN A TAXPAYER INFORMS AN IRS AGENT THAT HE BELIEVES THAT THERE IS AN ERROR IN ASSESSMENT AND THE AGENT STILL CONTINUES LEVY ACTION, WITHOUT FIRST DETERMINING THE MERIT OF THE TAXPAYER'S ARGUMENT, SUCH AGENT LOSES HIS IMMUNITY FROM A SUIT.

     26 USC 7214 (A) UNLAWFUL ACTS OF REVENUE OFFICERS OR AGENTS. ANY OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE OF THE UNITED STATES WHEN ACTING IN CONNECTION WITH ANY REVENUE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES AND VIOLATES ANY SECTION OF THIS ACT AS TO CRIMINAL OR WRONG DOING, SHALL BE FINED NOT MORE THAN $10,000 OR IMPRISONED NOT MORE THAN 5 YEARS, OR BOTH UPON CONVICTION BY THE COURT.

     MERIWETHER V. COUGHLIN, 879 F2D 1037 (2ND CIR. 1989): WHEN AN OFFICIAL HAS ACTUAL OR CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRACTICES AND FAILS TO ACT IN "DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE," THEN SUPERVISORY LIABILITY MAY BE IMPOSED UNDER TITLE 42, SEC. 1983. HE CAN BE SUED!

     MANY AMERICANS THINK THAT THEY HAVE NO LEGAL RIGHTS TO PROTECT THEMSELVES WHEN BEING WRONGED BY EITHER FEDERAL OR STATE GOVERNMENT. EVEN JUDGES HAVE BEEN SUED FOR CIVIL RIGHTS INJUSTICES IN COURT, BUT I DID NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THE RULINGS OR LACK OF RULINGS IN SUCH CASES EXCEPT TO HEAR A FEW STATE JUDGES GOT SUCCESSFULLY SUED FOR CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN THEIR STATE COURTS.

     I HEARD A NONSENSE LEGAL ARGUMENT BY SOME MEMBERS OF CONGRESS I UNDERSTAND THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE FINAL RIGHTS OF LEGAL AUTHORITY OVER STATE OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. I QUOTED SOME KEY LEGAL DECISIONS SHOWING THAT THE CONCEPT OF LAW AMERICA WAS FOUNDED UPON IN 1776 IS THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE COLLECTIVELY THE "KING" (AND "QUEEN"!) IN LEGAL AUTHORITY OVER ALL GOVERNMENT IN AMERICA WHETHER FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL. LOOK UP AT MY WEBSITE MY PROPOSED OMNI LAW WHICH IS TO AUTHORIZE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT OF REFERENDUM OVER FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WHETHER TO PASS A LAW OR POLICY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS DO NOT WANT TO PASS EVEN THOUGH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WANT THEM PASSED. AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE CAN CANCEL LAWS AND POLICIES BY NATIONAL REFERENDUM WHEN MEMBERS OF CONGRESS PASSED LAWS AND POLICIES CONTRARY TO THE WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND OFTEN KNOWING FULL WELL THAT THEY ACTED CONTRARY TO THE NATIONAL WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.  MY PROPOSED OMNI LAW IS MODELED AFTER THE ANCIENT 10 CIVIL TRIBUNE LAW OF ANCIENT ROME WHICH JAMES MADISON, FATHER OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS, ENDORSED AS THE SMARTEST IDEA OF ANCIENT MAN TO PROTECT HIS LEGAL RIGHTS FROM LEGAL TYRANNY IN GOVERNMENT AND TO FORCE THE GOVERNMENT TO BE THE SERVANT OF THE PEOPLE BY NATIONAL REFERENDUM INSTEAD OF LETTING THEM TRY TO BE MASTERS OVER THE PEOPLE AND DO MANY THINGS VIOLATING THE LEGAL RIGHTS OF THE ROMAN PEOPLE. ROME PROSPERED UNDER REFERENDUM BASED GOVERNMENT BUT LED BY STATESMEN, NOT MOB LEADERS, SO THE LAWS PASSED WERE WISE AND PRACTICAL FOR THE ROMANS TO LIVE UNDER. WHEN INTELLIGENT PEOPLE ADDRESSED THE ROMAN PEOPLE, THE PEOPLE RECOGNIZED WHAT WAS SMART AND VOTED FOR IT BY REFERENDUM. THIS WAS GOVERNMENT BY WILL OF THE PEOPLE, BUT THE PEOPLE DEBATED THE PROS AND CONS OF PROPOSED REFERENDUMS BEFORE VOTING. AND FOR HUNDREDS OF YEARS, THIS GAVE QUALITY, SMART, STATESMANLIKE GOVERNMENT TO THE PEOPLE AND THE ROMANS BECAME THE GREATEST RACE ON EARTH AND KNOWN TO BE THE MOST PRACTICAL RACE ON EARTH AT THE SAME TIME.

     FULL NAME OF THE OMNI LAW IS SHOWN ON OUR WEBSITE. WE DO ACCEPT SUPPORT FOR PASSAGE OF OUR OMNI LAW WHICH IS IN FULL NAME IS "THE OMNIBUS CIVIL RIGHTS ACT FOR AMERICA." PURCHASE OF OUR PRODUCTS SHOWN ON OUR WEBSITE AND LOAN PAYMENTS INTO OUR OMNI LAW LOAN PROGRAM HELP FINANCE THE COMING PASSAGE OF THE OMNI LAW AS THE NEWEST CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT IN AMERICA. IF YOU CAN'T ORDER THROUGH OUR WEBSITE, OUR MAILING ADDRESS FOR SUPPORT THEN IS NIFI, P.O. BOX 1465, SENECA, SC 29679 . MAKE CHECKS, ETC. OUT TO NIFI AND TELL US WHAT ANY PAYMENT IS FOR. WE MUST LOOK LIKE WE ARE SOON TO WIN IN AMERICA IN THE EYES OF THOSE IN WASH., D.C. WHO DON'T WANT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT OF REFERENDUM OVER WASH., D.C. WILD HACKING ATTACKS AND OTHER NASTY WASHINGTON TACTICS HAVE BEEN TRIED TRYING TO SLOW US DOWN FROM WINNING IN AMERICA. BUT WE MOVE ALONG AND WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED IF WE DO NOT SOON WIN IN AMERICA. WE HAVE MOMENTUM BEHIND US AND BUILDING! OUR WEBSITE IS WWW.FASTBOOMAMERICANECONOMY.COM OUR EMAIL IS FASTBOOMAMERICANECONOMY.COM@GMAIL.COM

     PASS THIS REPORT TO ALL YOU KNOW. LET'S WIN AMERICA FAST NOW! THIS SHOWS YOU LEGAL RIGHTS YOU HAVE UNDER LAW BUT WERE NEVER TAUGHT IN SCHOOL TO YOU. THEY WANT YOU TO THINK THAT YOU ARE HELPLESS AND CANNOT CHANGE THE DIRECTION OF AMERICA IF YOU WANT TO. WE ARE SHOWING YOU THAT WE CAN FULFILL THE HIGHEST IDEALISM THAT THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION OF 1776 STOOD FOR!

     YOURS FOR GOD AND COUNTRY, ERASMUS OF AMERICA (PEN NAME FOR THAT AMERICAN LEADER WHO SPENT ELEVEN CALENDAR YEARS IN MILITARY ACADEMIES AND THEN A WILD BACKGROUND IN MILITARY INTELLIGENCE CRACKING EVEN THE TOP  NUCLEAR ANNIHILATION PLANS AGAINST AMERICA FROM THE MOSCOW INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR STUDIES. STUDIED WITH SIX OF THE MOST BRILLIANT ECONOMISTS OF AMERICA AND EUROPE INCLUDING A GERMAN ECONOMIST ENDORSED BY ALBERT EINSTEIN AS TEACHING THE ONLY TRUE ECONOMIC SCIENCE IN THE 20TH CENTURY. IT IS SUPER FREE ENTERPRISE AND WILL SKYROCKET THE AMERICAN ECONOMY BY TACTICS USED BEFORE WITH SUPER SUCCESS BUT WERE CENSORED FROM YOU IN YOUR SCHOOLS SO YOU WOULD NOT KNOW THAT WE CAN SKYROCKET THE ECONOMY OF AMERICA WHENEVER WE DECIDE TO. WE WILL SKYROCKET PAST CHINA IN SUPER GROWTH THROUGH SUPER FREE ENTERPRISE ONCE WE PASS THE OMNI LAW. WE DON'T NEED COMMUNISM IN AMERICA AS SOME IN WASH., D.C. STAND FOR. FREE ENTERPRISE IS THE RIGHT ANSWER FOR AMERICA AND BASED UPON THE GOD-GIVEN RIGHTS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE UNDER LAW AS FOUNDED IN 1776, BUT FORGOTTEN BY TOO MANY IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION TODAY IN AMERICA! I HAVE BRILLIANT FRIENDS WHO WILL HELP MOVE AMERICA ONCE THE OMNI LAW IS PASSED. MY MOTHER HAD ONCE BEEN RATED BY I.Q. TEST TO BE THE MOST BRILLIANT CHILD IN AMERICAN HISTORY UP TO THEN AND ENTERED A STATE UNIVERSITY WITHOUT PRIOR FORMAL EDUCATION AFTER SELF-EDUCATING HERSELF. SHE WAS A CHILD ACTRESS AND HAD NO TIME FOR FORMAL SCHOOLING, SO SELF-EDUCATED HERSELF AFTER LEARNING HOW TO READ AND WRITE FROM HER GRANDMOTHER. I.Q. IS NICE BUT A CANADIAN BUSINESS FRIEND OF MINE ONCE DEFINED WELL WHAT REAL EDUCATION IS. "EDUCATION IS APPLICATION!" THAT GOES FOR THE NON-EDUCATED THOMAS EDISON AND THE SUPER EDUCATED ALBERT EINSTEIN. I AM A TEAM PLAYER. I HAVE BRILLIANT FRIENDS AND WE FORM A POTENT FORCE TO HELP AMERICA WITH ONCE THE OMNI LAW IS PASSED.

     HOWEVER, I BELIEVE LIKE RONALD REAGAN DID IN THE ENORMOUS TALENT HIDDEN IN THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. ONCE THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT STOP THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, THE WHOLE NATION CAN AWAKEN TO HOW BRILLIANT IT IS CAPABLE OF BEING AND WE COLLECTIVELY WILL RESTORE AMERICA TO THE GREATNESS IT IS CAPABLE OF. I BELIEVE IN YOU IS WHY I WROTE THE OMNI LAW FOR YOU. AND WHILE I HAVE SOME ANSWERS THAT CAN SOLVE SOME KEY PROBLEMS OF AMERICA, IT IS THE COLLECTIVE GENIUS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT WILL BE UNLOCKED BY PASSAGE OF THE OMNI LAW. USE THIS LEGAL RIGHTS REPORT SO NO WRONG ELEMENTS IN AMERICA WALK OVER YOUR GOD-GIVEN RIGHTS IN AMERICA. GOD BLESS AMERICA! GOD BLESS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! AND LET'S MAKE GOD PROUD OF AMERICA AGAIN! WE WERE BORN FOR GREATNESS AS A PEOPLE AS GOD INTENDED FOR OUR NATION AND RACE!)

Pope Pentagon?

Pope Pentagon?

(Is this man trying to imitate the Pope or is there a plan to get rid of the Pope?)

Pentagon Freezes Work at 9 Biodefense Labs Working with Bioterror Germs

After investigation reveals dangerous flaws

 

by Julie Fidler | Infowars.com | September 4, 2015

http://www.infowars.com/pentagon-freezes-work-at-9-biodefense-labs-working-with-bioterror-germs/

 

Pope Francis Delivers ‘Gossiping Is Like Terrorism’ Speech In Vatican City

Compared a person who gossips to "a terrorist who throws a bomb"

 

by Tim Marcin | International Business Times | September 4, 2015

http://www.infowars.com/pope-francis-delivers-gossiping-is-like-terrorism-speech-in-vatican-city/