Saturday, February 6, 2016

Feds Protect Their Turf


Feds Protect Their Turf By Re-classifying Patrio​ts As 
'Domestic Terrorists'

 

For all of you who do not know who the BLM is...............
The Bureau of Land Management is assumed falsely to be an actual de jure lawful agency of a lawful constitutional governing body.

The BLM is in fact, a de facto fraudulent usurper and not in any way a lawful Constitutionally recognized agency of the Constitutional Republic.

BLM is actually a sub-corporation of UNITED STATES INCORPORATED, a private foreign owned off-shore corporation since its last incorporation in 1925, copyrighted, trademarked and registered in Puerto Rico.

Under the Reorganization Act of Washington District of Columbia, by it’s own private business charter, neither the BLM, nor any other federal/corporate agency has lawful/legal authority, jurisdiction or interstate nexus within the 50 state geographical landmass.

BLM, is actually classified as an: “Agent of Foreign Principle”, under the intergovernmental Personnel Act.

In other words, they don’t represent the Constitutional Republic or the interests of the American People but rather, a foreign owned principle i.e., the international banking/military corporate cartel of London City, England known as Crown Corporation as their supreme authority.

This has been openly admitted and exposed through Supreme Court cases since and even before 1938.

NOTE: It is now illegal to mention any of these pre-1938 Supreme Court citations in a current court of law in Amerika.

That should prove everything to you right there.

This private criminal foreign owned off-shore corporation (USA Inc.) has in fact, invaded and usurped our Constitutional Republic like a cancer invading a host body since 1871 to present.

The core issue here is that the BLM must be exposed for the invading criminal usurpers that they are. They have no legal/lawful standing and must be deemed as an invading hostile corporate/military enemy of We The People.

This is no different than having a snake-pit of London Banksters coming to Nevada to lord over the Bundy family, which is exactly who the real bosses of the BLM actually are by-the-way.

The only issue that should be addressed is, does the BLM have legal standing?

The answer is: No, they do not have legal standing and they know it. They just hope the American People never come to that realization.

It’s time for the American People to learn the actual truth about our real history as a nation and not all the myths and lies spewed out by our fascist/marxist collectivist controlled school systems.


**********************

Feds Protect Their Turf By Re-classifying Patriots 
As 'Domestic Terrorists'
 
Friday, February 05, 2016 11:39 AM
 
Feds Protect Their Turf By Re-classifying Patriots 
As 'Domestic Terrorists'
Technocracy News

Now that American civilian constitutionalists are being classified as “terrorists,” it is time to reconsider what is truly going on in the Middle East. Perhaps those “terrorists” are more like our patriots that we care to consider. The “war on terror” is a war on civilian nationalists, ever-malleable in its definition, conducted without any constitutional authority, oversight, or constraint.
TN Note: This is a most dangerous precedent when the government turns its forces against its own citizens. With anti-government sentiments already running so high in America, this could result in a massive confrontation if not checked. 
The U.S. Justice Department is considering legal changes to combat what it sees as a rising threat from domestic 'anti-government extremists', senior officials told Reuters, even as it steps up efforts to stop Islamic State-inspired attacks at home.
'Extremist groups' motivated by a range of U.S.-born philosophies present a “clear and present danger,” John Carlin, the Justice Department’s chief of national security, told Reuters in an interview. “Based on recent reports and the cases we are seeing, it seems like we’re in a heightened environment.”
Over the past year, the Justice Department has brought charges against domestic extremist suspects accused of attempting to bomb U.S. military bases, kill police officers and fire bomb a school and other buildings in a predominantly Muslim town in New York state.
But federal prosecutors tackling domestic extremists still lack an important legal tool they have used extensively in dozens of prosecutions against Islamic State-inspired suspects: a law that prohibits supporting designated terrorist groups.
Carlin and other Justice Department officials declined to say if they would ask Congress for a comparable domestic extremist statute, or comment on what other changes they might pursue to toughen the fight against anti-government extremists.
The U.S. State Department designates international terrorist organizations to which it is illegal to provide “material support.” No domestic groups have that designation, helping to create a disparity in charges faced by international extremist suspects compared to domestic ones.
A Reuters analysis of more than 100 federal cases found that domestic terrorism suspects collectively have faced less severe charges than those accused of acting on behalf of Islamic State since prosecutors began targeting that group in early 2014.
The Justice Department aggressively pursued domestic extremists after Timothy McVeigh bombed a federal building in Oklahoma City in 1995, killing 168 people.
The government shifted its focus to international terrorism after al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 Americans on Sept. 11, 2001.
But in recent years anti-government activists, like those who occupied a wildlife preserve in eastern Oregon last month, have regained prominence.
https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2016/02/04/feds-protect-turf-re-classifying-patriots-domestic-terrorists/

Kirk F. MacKenzie. All rights reserved.
Citizens Newswire(tm) is a free, volunteer digest of news & views you won't hear on TV.
It spans a wide array of topics regarding the future of our world. Unsubscribe using
the following link, or by emailing me a request.
Kirk@SilentNoMorePublications


THE PUBLIC LAND ASSAULT

 
THE PUBLIC LAND
ASSAULT
 
 Saturday, January 30, 2016 12:27 PM
 

Here is an article by the prior owners of Hammond’s land. Thanks Doyel. Jan confirms the federal land confiscations were already in progress by the early 70’s.

So here’s the timeline.

1962 The Eisenhower Report was published to put an end to confusion about federal authority over our federation’s public lands. Accordingly to the report, nearly all public lands are under the exclusive legislative authority of the States! Not the federal government. Perhaps Eisenhower understood the looming threat and took pre-emptive action to lock in our rights. However, JFK (D) was president in 1962. It was administration that published the report.

1963 JFK was assassinated and replaced by LBJ (D), who remained in office until 1969.

1969 Richard Nixon became president, and remained in office until 1974.

by the early 1970’s Federal aggression began.

1976 The globalists responded with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA). The act reversed the constitutional requirement for the public lands to be disposed of—converted to private property—and declared federal “ownership" of these lands. However, the Constitution may not be amended by legislation. Unconstitutional legislation is automatically null and void. Gerald Ford (R) was President, Nelson Rockefeller (R) was Vice President and Senate President, and Carl Albert (D) was House Speaker. Once again, the Rockefeller thumbprint.
 
 
Citizens Newswire is a free, volunteer digest of news & views you won't hear on TV.
It spans a wide array of topics regarding the future of our world. Unsubscribe using
the following link, or by emailing me a request.
Kirk@SilentNoMorePublications

THE EMINENT COLLAPSE OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMY


Thank you JS!............ 

 

THE EMINENT COLLAPSE OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMY




HOW DO WE,
AS AN
"AWAKENED PEOPLE"
COME TOGETHER

AND ' UN-ORCHESTRATE ' THIS

CREATED - PLANNED  ' CATASTROPHE ' ???


POST YOUR RESPONSES

SHARE THIS

START THINKING


" ORCHESTRATED  CATASTROPHE "

The  EMINENT  COLLAPSE of the GLOBAL ECONOMY
THE  LAST  ACT  OF A  TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT  IS TO  LOOT  IT'S   PEOPLE
THE LOOMING  WORLD  FINANCIAL  CRISIS IS AN ORCHESTRATED CATASTROPHE.   
THE FINAL  STAGES  BEGAN IN THE EARLY  2000'S WHEN FINANCIAL RISKS WERE TRANSFERRED  FROM  THE RICH WHO MADE BAD INVESTMENTS   TO  THE   TAXPAYERS   IN THE FORM OF   BAILOUTS   UNDER THE GUISE OF THE TOO-BIG-TOO-FAIL FALSE DOCTRINE.
THE CENTRAL BANKING   GLOBALIST   CREATED MULTIPLE FINANCIAL  HEGELIAN DIALECTIC    PARADIGMS COMPRISING   THREE STAGES   OF DEVELOPMENT:  

THEIR   ORCHESTRATED   PROBLEM   GIVING   RISE  TO OUR REACTION  TO BE    RESOLVED BY   THEIR   SOLUTION.
UNLESS WE, THE PEOPLE,    UNDERSTAND   HOW THEY ARE   SETTING   US   UP    FOR    ENSLAVEMENT,   WE WILL   CONTINUE TO  PROVIDE   THEM WITH THE MORAL   AUTHORITY   TO  SUCCEED.
THE FOLLOWING IS A   SYNOPSIS   OF A   FEW  OF THEIR SECONDARY   ENGINEERED PROBLEM -   REACTION   - SOLUTION   PARADIGMS  WHICH IS   CONTRIBUTING TO THEIR   PLANNED   EMINENT   COLLAPSE OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMY   WHICH   MAY REQUIRE   A   MAJOR DISTRACTION   SUCH AS    WWIII   AS    EVIDENCED BY THE WORLD   FINANCIAL   CRASHES  IN  1917   PRECEDING WWI   AND   1929  PRECEDING   WWII:
Government policies and the subprime mortgage crisis
...'The Great Recession was a period of general economic decline observed in world markets beginning around the end of the first decade of the 21st century. The exact scale and timing of the recession, and whether it has ended, is debated and varied from country to country. In terms of overall impact, the International Monetary Fund concluded that it was the worst global recession since World War II. According to the US National Bureau of Economic Research (the official arbiter of US recessions) the US recession began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009, and thus extended over 19 months. The Great Recession was related to the US financial crisis of 200708 and subprime mortgage crisis of 200709.'... 
The U.S. subprime mortgage crisis was a set of events and conditions that led to a financial crisis and subsequent recession that began in 2005. It was characterized by a rise in subprime mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures, and the resulting decline of securities backed by said mortgages. Several major financial institutions collapsed in September 2008, with significant disruption in the flow of credit to businesses and consumers and the onset of a severe global recession.

PROBLEM

Government housing policies, over-regulation, failed regulation and deregulation have all been claimed as causes of the crisis, along with many others
.'...
...'In finance, subprime lending (also referred to as near-prime, non-prime, and second-chance lending) means making loans to people who may have difficulty maintaining the repayment schedule, sometimes reflecting setbacks, such as unemployment, divorce, medical emergencies, etc. Historically, subprime borrowers were defined as having FICO scores below 640, although "this has varied over time and circumstances."
These loans are characterized by higher interest rates, poor quality collateral, and less favorable terms in order to compensate for higher credit risk. Many subprime loans were packaged into mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and ultimately defaulted, contributing to the financial crisis of 20072008.
Proponents of subprime lending maintain that the practice extends credit to people who would otherwise not have access to the credit market. Professor Harvey S. Rosen of Princeton University explained, "The main thing that innovations in the mortgage market have done over the past 30 years is to let in the excluded: the young, the discriminated-against, the people without a lot of money in the bank to use for a down payment."'...

REACTION

...'The financial crisis of 2007-08, also known as the global financial crisis and 2008 financial crisis, is considered by many economists to have been the worst
financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

SOLUTION

It threatened the collapse of large financial institutions, which was prevented by the
bailout of banks by national governments, but stock markets still dropped worldwide.'...

PROBLEM

...'The emergence of sub-prime loan losses in 2007 began the crisis and exposed other risky loans and over-inflated asset prices. With loan losses mounting and the fall of Lehman Brothers on 15 September 2008, a major panic broke out on the inter-bank loan market. There was the equivalent of a bank run on the shadow banking system, resulting in many large and well established investment and commercial banks in the United States and Europe suffering huge losses and even facing bankruptcy, resulting in massive public financial assistance (government bailouts).'...
Margin Call is a 2011 American independent drama film written and directed by J. C. Chandor. The story takes place over a 36-hour period at a large Wall Street investment bank [Lehman Brothers?] and highlights the initial stages of the financial crisis of 200708.
PROBLEM

...'The core activities of  
investment banks   are subject to regulation and monitoring by    central banks    and other government institutions - but it has been common practice for investment banks   to conduct   many   of their transactions in ways that    do  not  show up on their  conventional  balance sheet accounting and so are not visible to regulators or unsophisticated investors. For example, prior to the 2007-2012 financial crisis, investment banks financed mortgages through off-balance sheet (OBS) securitizations (e.g. asset-backed commercial paper  programs) and hedged risk through off-balance sheet credit default swaps.'...
...'The volume of transactions in the shadow banking system grew dramatically after the year 2000. Its growth was checked by the 2008 crisis and for a short while it declined in size, both in the US and in the rest of the world. In 2007 the Financial Stability Board estimated the size of the SBS in the U.S. to be around $25 trillion, but by 2011 estimates indicated a decrease to $24 trillion. Globally, a study of the 11 largest national shadow banking systems found that they totaled $50 trillion in 2007, fell to $47 trillion in 2008, but by late 2011 had climbed to $51 trillion, just over their estimated size before the crisis. Overall, the worldwide SBS totaled about $60 trillion as of late 2011.'...
...'The shadow banking system makes up 25 to 30 percent of the total financial system, according to the Financial Stability Board (FSB), a regulatory task force for the world's group of top 20 economies (G20).'...
...'Like regular banks, shadow banks provide credit and generally increase the liquidity of the financial sector. Yet unlike their more regulated competitors, they lack access to central bank funding or safety nets such as deposit insurance and debt guarantees. In contrast to traditional banks, shadow banks do not take deposits. Instead, they rely on short-term funding provided either by asset-backed commercial paper or by the repo market, in which borrowers in substance offer collateral as security against a cash loan, through the mechanism of selling the security to a lender and agreeing to repurchase it at an agreed time in the future for an agreed price.'...
REACTION

...'The shadow banking system has been implicated as significantly contributing to the global financial crisis of 20072012.'...
...'Economist Paul Krugman described the run on the shadow banking system as the "core of what happened" to cause the crisis.'...

SOLUTION

...'The "too big to fail" theory asserts that certain corporations, and particularly financial institutions, are so large and so interconnected that their failure would be disastrous to the greater economic system, and that they therefore must be supported by government when they face potential failure. The colloquial term "too big to fail" was popularized by
U.S. Congressman Stewart McKinney in a 1984 Congressional hearing, discussing the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's intervention with Continental Illinois. The term had previously been used occasionally in the press.
Proponents of this theory believe that some institutions are so important that they should become recipients of beneficial financial and economic policies from governments or central banks. Some economists such as Paul Krugman hold that economies of scale in banks and in other businesses are worth preserving, so long as they are well regulated in proportion to their economic clout, and therefore that "too big to fail" status can be acceptable. The global economic system must also deal with sovereign states being too big to fail.'
Opponents believe that one of the problems that arises is moral hazard whereby a company that benefits from these protective policies will seek to profit by it, deliberately taking positions (see Asset allocation) that are high-risk high-return, as they are able to leverage these risks based on the policy preference they receive. The term has emerged as prominent in public discourse since the 20072010 global financial crisis.'...
...'In economics, moral hazard occurs when one person takes more risks because someone else bears the burden of those risks.'...

PROBLEM

...'A taxpayer-funded government bailout of financial institutions during the
savings and loan crisis may have created a moral hazard and acted as encouragement to lenders to make similar higher risk loans.'...

REACTION

...'For example, with respect to the originators of
subprime loans, many may have suspected that the borrowers would not be able to maintain their payments in the long run and that, for this reason, the loans were not going to be worth much. Still, because there were many buyers of these loans (or of pools of these loans) willing to take on that risk, the originators did not concern themselves with the potential long-term consequences of making these loans. After selling the loans, the originators bore none of the risk so there was little to no incentive for the originators to investigate the long-term value of the loans. A party makes a decision about how much risk to take, while another party bears the costs if things go badly, and the party isolated from risk behaves differently from how it would if it were fully exposed to the risk.'...

SOLUTION

...'Failure to regulate the non-depository banking system (also called the
shadow banking system) has also been blamed. The non-depository system grew to exceed the size of the regulated depository banking system, but the investment banks, insurers, hedge funds, and money market funds were not subject to the same regulations. Many of these institutions suffered the equivalent of a bank run, with the notable collapses of Lehman Brothers and AIG during September 2008 precipitating a financial crisis and subsequent recession.
The government also repealed or implemented several laws that limited the regulation of the banking industry, such as the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act and implementation of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000. The former allowed depository and investment banks to merge while the latter limited the regulation of financial derivatives.'...
...'The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 exempted derivatives from regulation, supervision, trading on established exchanges, and capital reserve requirements for major participants. Concerns that counterparties to derivative deals would be unable to pay their obligations caused pervasive uncertainty during the crisis.'...

PROBLEM

...'When investment bank
Lehman Brothers went bankrupt in September 2008, there was much uncertainty as to which financial firms would be required to honor the CDS contracts on its $600 billion of bonds outstanding.
Economist Joseph Stiglitz summarized how credit default swaps contributed to the systemic meltdown: "With this complicated intertwining of bets of great magnitude, no one could be sure of the financial position of anyone else-or even of one's own position. Not surprisingly, the credit markets froze.

REACTION

Former President
Bill Clinton and former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan indicated they did not properly regulate derivatives, including credit default swaps (CDS). A bill (the "Derivatives Markets Transparency and Accountability Act of 2009") (H.R. 977) was unsuccessfully introduced to further regulate the CDS market and establish a clearinghouse. This bill would provide the authority to suspend CDS trading under certain conditions.

SOLUTION

Author
Michael Lewis wrote that CDS and synthetic CDO derivatives enabled speculators to stack bets on the same mortgage bonds and CDO's. This is analogous to allowing many persons to buy insurance on the same house. Speculators that bought CDS insurance were betting that significant defaults would occur, while the sellers (such as AIG) bet they would not. A theoretically infinite amount could be wagered on the same housing-related securities, provided buyers and sellers of the CDS could be found. He referred to this as a "Doomsday Machine.'...
THE MAJOR PARADIGM THEY CREATED IS A DEBT BASED ECONOMIC SYSTEM PYRAMID SCHEME WHICH CAN NEVER STAND INDEFINITELY. ONCE IT CRASHES, WHICH IT IS IN THE PROCESS OF DOING NOW WITH FALLING MARKETS, RETAILS SALES, OIL PRICES, RUNAWAY INFLATION, ETC., WE, THE PEOPLE ARE ENSLAVED ABSOLUTELY BY DESIGN, BECAUSE THEIR SOLUTION WILL BE TOTAL FASCISM.
Money As Debt


  
The Eleventh Marble
 

WHERE TO RETIRE AND MORE....


WHERE TO RETIRE AND MORE....


You can retire to Phoenix, Arizona, where...
                          
1. You are willing to park 3 blocks away from your house because you found shade.      
              
2. You've experienced condensation on your behind from the hot water in the toilet bowl.             
              
3. You can drive for 4 hours in one direction and never leave town.             
              
4. You have over 100 recipes for Mexican food.              
              
5. You know that "dry heat" is comparable to what hits you in the face when you open your oven door.              
              
6. The 4 seasons are: tolerable, hot, really hot, and ARE YOU KIDDING ME??

                OR              
You can retire to California, where...              
              
1. You make over $450,000 and you still can't afford to buy a house.             
             
2. The fastest part of your commute is going down your driveway.              
              
3. You know how to eat an artichoke.              
              
4. You drive your rented Mercedes to your neighborhood block party.          
              
5. When someone asks you how far something is, you tell them how long it will take to get there rather than how many miles away it is.              
              
6. The 4 seasons are: Fire, Flood, Mud, and Drought.
    
                OR
You can retire to New York City, where...              
              
1. You say "the city" and expect everyone to know you mean Manhattan.             
              
2. You can get into a four-hour argument about how to get from Columbus Circle to Battery Park, but can't find Wisconsin on a map.              
              
3. You think Central Park is "nature."             
              
4. You believe that being able to swear at people in their own language makes you multi-lingual.               
              
5. You've worn out a car horn (if you have a car).              
              
6. You think eye contact is an act of aggression.
 
                OR       
You can retire to Minnesota, where...              
               
1. You only have three spices - salt, pepper, and ketchup.      
              
2. Halloween costumes have to fit over parkas.               
              
3. You have seventeen recipes for casserole.            
              
4. Sexy lingerie is anything flannel with less than eight buttons.              
              
5. The four seasons are: almost winter, winter, still winter, and road repair.
              
6. The highest level of criticism is  "He is different, she is different, or it was different!
     
                OR
You can retire to the Deep South, where...              
              
1. You can rent a movie and buy bait in the same store.              
              
2. "Y'all" is singular and "all y'all" is plural.              
              
3. "He needed killin" is a valid defense.              
              
4. Everyone has 2 first names: Billy Bob, Jimmy Bob, Joe Bob, Betty Jean, Mary Beth, etc etc.               
              
5. Everywhere is either "in yonder", "over yonder" or "out yonder".
 
                OR            
You can retire to Colorado, where...              
              
1. You carry your $3,000 mountain bike atop your $500 car.              
              
2. You tell your husband to pick up Granola on his way home and so he stops at the day care center.              
              
3. A pass does not involve a football or dating.
                
4. The top of your head is bald, but you still have a pony tail.

                OR     
You can retire to Wyoming, where...
              
1. You've never met any celebrities, but the mayor knows your name.
         
2. Your idea of a traffic jam is three cars waiting to pass a tractor or cattle to cross the road.
         
3. You have had to switch from "heat" to "A/C" on the same day.
         
4. You end sentences with a preposition: "Where's my coat at?"
          
                OR     

Finally, you can retire to Florida, where...   
   
1. You eat dinner at 3:15 in the afternoon.
          
2. All purchases include a coupon of some kind – even houses and cars.
        
3. Everyone can recommend an excellent cardiologist, dermatologist, proctologist, podiatrist, or orthopedist.
    
4. Road construction never ends anywhere in the state.
        
5. Cars in front of you often appear to be driven by headless people.

=============================                                                                

HOT COFFEE and PRIME MINISTERS


I was eating breakfast with my teenaged Granddaughter and I asked her,

"What special day is it in Canada tomorrow"?

Without skipping a beat she said, "It's Prime Minister Day!"


She's smart, so I asked her "What does 'Prime Minister Day' mean"?

I was waiting for something about the Trudeaus or Harper, etc.
She replied, "Prime Minister Day is when the Prime Minister steps out of the Prime Minister's Mansion and, if he sees his shadow, we have 4 more years of Bull Shit."

You know, it hurts when hot coffee spurts out your nose.
===============================
Subject:   The Cardiologist


A mechanic was removing a cylinder-head from the motor of a Harley motorcycle when he spotted a well-known cardiologist in his shop.   The cardiologist was there waiting for the service manager to come and take a look at his bike when the mechanic shouted across the Garage, ‘Hey Doc, want to take a look at this'?

The cardiologist, a bit surprised, walked over to where the mechanic was working on the motorcycle.  The mechanic straightened up, wiped his hands on a rag and asked, “So Doc, look at this engine.   I opened its heart, took the valves out, repaired any damage, and then put them back in, and when I finish, it works just like new…   So how come I make $40,000 a year and you get the really big bucks ($1,500,000), when you and I are doing basically the same work?’

The cardiologist paused, smiled and leaned over, then whispered to the mechanic… “Try doing it with the engine running.”


Might as well abolish our immigration laws


Border  agent:  'We  might  as  well  abolish  our  immigration  laws  altogether'

THIS IS REALLY WHY THEY ASSASSI NATED LAVOY FINICUM




This Is Really Why They Assassinated LaVoy Finicum

Friday, February 5, 2016 6:06

 
(Before It's News)
THE MILLENNIUM REPORT: Reporting the Most Important News in the World Today

A True Patriot Was Murdered by the U.S. Federal Government With Explicit Purpose And Intention

hqdefault-1
SOTN Editor’s Note:
There is a LOT of rumor and innuendo circulating on the Internet regarding the premeditated assassination of LaVoy Finicum.  Regardless of the different spurious accounts, it is critical to understand that this government black operation was a meticulously preplanned ambush.  Why else would they shoot a man 9 times as he lay on the ground, who had previously had his hands in the air?

LaVoy Finicum: Shot 9 times by the FBI during staged assassination
The explicit purpose of this op was to assassinate LaVoy Finicum and to take the remaining men as political prisoners.  In this regard the U.S. Federal Government has succeeded.  However, in the process of carrying out the extrajudicial and unlawful execution of LaVoy Finicum, they have created the first martyr of the Freedom Movement 0f 2016.
The First Martyr of the Movement in 2016, The FEDs Arrest Burns Protest Leadership
The following video offers a firsthand account from a witness in the vehicle when LaVoy Finicum was murdered in cold blood.  Shawna Cox provides excellent testimony of the assassination and describes exactly what happened before, during and after the government ambush.  Case closed!  Government “GUILTY” by dint of irrefutable evidence and testimony.
The Ambush and Murder of Robert “LaVoy” Finicum
Every patriot is encouraged to listen to her important portrayal of events.  In so doing it becomes clear that they targeted LaVoy from the beginning of the preplanned operation. The hit team had their laser trained on him and all the protesters were doing was driving to a meeting with the county sheriff and conducting their education sessions.

 
 
The letter from Ammon Bundy posted in its entirety below is extremely significant as it explains why the protest movement poses such a dire threat to the current governmental tyranny.  Bundy makes it clear that the real purpose of the whole endeavor in Burns, Oregon was to educate the American people.  Especially by informing the ranch owners and farmers across America who routinely bump up against the BLM, they could be empowered to respond to the illegal government initiatives now plaguing the West.
ARE YOU KIDDING ME... WHEN IS SOMEONE GOING TO STOP THIS PISS-ANT PUNK???
Let’s face it, there’s nothing scarier to a despotic government than an enlightened and informed citizenry.  Hence, the burgeoning, organically grown, Western lands protest movement is Obama’s worst nightmare.  Their whole Agenda 21 implementation plan will be subverted should this crucial movement gain traction nationwide.
BLM Targets Private Land for Agenda 21
Now the reader knows just how BIG this “war over the land” really is. It doesn’t get any bigger that the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.  This global initiative represents the final battle between the 1% and the 99%.  Although it sounds good on the face of it, it is, at its very core, the ultimate land grab across the entire planet.  The following link exposes critical aspects of this ongoing, global implementation plan.
NWO Cabal Pursues Total Dominion Over The Earth’s Weather And Natural Resources
Hopefully, Bundy and Hammond and other patriots know the real deal here.  This current battle makes David & Goliath look like a walk in the park.  And the enemy will only get fiercer and firmer in their future responses to any deviations from the status quo or public provocations.
State of the Nation
February 5, 2016

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Open Letter from Ammon Bundy
 
Dear Friends,
Hundreds of people were freely coming into the refuge to get education on their rights.  Many group presentations were given each day.  On Saturday, the 24th, ten ranchers from Oregon, Nevada, Utah, and Arizona nullified their grazing contracts with the BLM and U.S. Forest Service.  On Saturday, the 24th, grand jury administrators from Nebraska and Florida were forming a grand jury to review the abuses in the Hammond case.  Tuesday, the 27th, the day LaVoy was killed, we began releasing documents exposing criminal acts by the government.  The evening of the 27th, a meeting was scheduled with Grant County residents to give a presentation with those at the refuge.  To give their presentation to hundreds of people in the county, including the county Sheriff. 
The FBI attacked those who were to give the presentation on the way to this peaceful meeting, leaving hundreds at the meeting with no speakers.  On Wednesday, the 28th, a follow up meeting was scheduled with Harney County residents with those at the refuge to finalize actions to claim back lands that were taken by the BLM, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and United States Forest Service.  This included plans to take action to begin logging again in Harney County and to restore the thriving economy once known to the Harney County residents.  On Thursday evening, the 29th, a meeting was scheduled with Malheur County residents with those at the refuge to give a presentation on the constitution as it pertained to federal limits to land ownership inside the states. This meeting was to occur in Ontario, Oregon.  Hundreds were expected to attend.  The sheriff’s Department also accepted the invitation and was scheduled to attend.
On Friday afternoon, the 30th, residents surrounding Jordan Valley, Oregon, had scheduled a seminar with those at the refuge to come out and inform them of how they can protect themselves from a national monument that is to be signed in by President Obama this year, 2016.  This monument is twice the size of Yellowstone, takes up a third of the county’s land mass, and will put over 250 ranchers out of business as they know it.  Ranchers from Malheur county were scheduled to nullify their contracts with the U.S. Forest Service.
In the following weeks, meetings were scheduled in Wyoming, Montana, Utah, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and the State of Washington.  Multiple Skype meetings were also set up throughout the Western U.S.  All these meetings were to discuss how they would stand against the unconstitutional land control by the federal government.  Those at the refuge collected over 50 testimonies of ranchers who lost their family property to the U.S. Government in Harney and surrounding counties.  Hundreds of government documents were compiled by those at the refuge.  Many of the documents exposed abusive actions by federal government officials, Judge Grasty, Harney County Sheriff’s Department and direct abuses to the Hammond family.
Escalation of force from the FBI, OSP, and the Sheriff’s Department incrementally increased as the education from the refuge expanded.  Government officials knew that if they did not take forceful preemptive action to stop the expanding the influence of the refuge, many would begin to stand for land rights as protected by the United States Constitution.  Make no mistake about it: those that were educating at the refuge and are now suffering in jail at this time are political prisoners.
Those at the refuge never pointed a gun and never pulled a trigger to kill.  They chose to educate, giving others the freedom to choose.  The government promoted fear and forceful tactics to control and stop this education.  And ultimately, they used force by the barrel of the gun. 
Please watch the video below.
Sincerely, 
Ammon Bundy
2/4/16

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7U0ssZBU4w
Link: To contribute to Ammon’s defense:https://www.fundedjustice.com/en/projects/28054-Ammon-Bundy—Legal-Defense-Fund
This Is Really Why They Assassinated LaVoy Finicum | SOTN: Alternative News & Commentary
__
 THE MILLENNIUM REPORT: Reporting the Most Important News in the World Today