Saturday, September 3, 2016

dutchsinse : RESPONSE to denial of weather modification + HAARP


Weather Modification + HAARP denied -- RESPONSE -- 
𝔼𝕒𝕣π•₯π•™π•’π•¦π•’π•œπ•–πŸ›π”» 𝓡𝓲𝓿𝒆 𝓼𝓽𝓻𝒆π“ͺ𝓢



Published on Sep 1, 2016
 
Earthquake Monitoring Links below!

This stream is showing the past 48 hours of USGS reported earthquakes + the last 50 EMSC reported earthquakes internationally.

No voice in this video unless a large earthquake strikes.

Marker height off the globe = depth into the Earth.

The feed may show double earthquakes in some locations due to both USGS + EMSC agencies reporting the events.

When an earthquake strikes, you will hear a rumble, ding, and a bell toll. The bell will toll the number of times = to the earthquake which occurs. (example : M4.0 will ring 4 times).

The most recent earthquake has a green placemark / flag on it.


Posted by Anonymous at 7:29:00 PM 0 comments

dutchsinse : 𝔼𝕒𝕣π•₯π•™π•’π•¦π•’π•œπ•–πŸ›π”» 𝓡𝓲𝓿𝒆 𝓼𝓽𝓻𝒆π“ͺ𝓢


𝔼𝕒𝕣π•₯π•™π•’π•¦π•’π•œπ•–πŸ›π”» 𝓡𝓲𝓿𝒆 𝓼𝓽𝓻𝒆π“ͺ𝓢 ▂▃▄▅▆▇█▓▒░48 hours global activity░▒▓█▇▆▅▄▃▂


 
Started streaming 20 hours ago

Earthquake Monitoring Links below!

This stream is showing the past 48 hours of USGS reported earthquakes + the last 50 EMSC reported earthquakes internationally.

No voice in this video unless a large earthquake strikes.

Marker height off the globe = depth into the Earth.

The feed may show double earthquakes in some locations due to both USGS + EMSC agencies reporting the events.

When an earthquake strikes, you will hear a rumble, ding, and a bell toll. The bell will toll the number of times = to the earthquake which occurs. (example : M4.0 will ring 4 times).

The most recent earthquake has a green placemark / flag on it.

Earthquake Monitoring Links below!

This stream is showing the past 48 hours of USGS reported earthquakes + the last 50 EMSC reported earthquakes internationally.

No voice in this video unless a large earthquake strikes.

Marker height off the globe = depth into the Earth.

The feed may show double earthquakes in some locations due to both USGS + EMSC agencies reporting the events.

When an earthquake strikes, you will hear a rumble, ding, and a bell toll. The bell will toll the number of times = to the earthquake which occurs. (example : M4.0 will ring 4 times).

The most recent earthquake has a green placemark / flag on it.

____

Download the full version of earthquake3D here:
http://www.wolton.net/quakes.html

Free version here:
http://www.wolton.net/quake.html

______


check my websites here:
http://www.youtube.com/dutchsinse
http://www.facebook.com/dutchsinseoff...
http://www.dutchsinse.com
http://www.twitter.com/dutchsinse

Posted by Anonymous at 7:20:00 PM 0 comments

Gareth Williams - No 7 in the Clinton Body Count in the past 80 days?


SPY  IN  A  BAG --- HE  KNEW  TOO  MUCH  ABOUT  BILL  &  HILLARY ???



'Spy  in  a  bag'  case:  Gareth  Williams  was  blackmailed  with  'staged  photos  in  Las  Vegas  hotel  room'  by  Russian  spies,  claims  former  KGB  agent

Boris Karpichkov now lives in the UK under a new identity



A former KGB major says he believes Gareth Williams was murdered by Russian hit men as the MI6 spy refused to become a double agent, even after they blackmailed him by taking compromising, staged photographs.

The former major and intelligence officer Boris Karpichkov, who was exiled from Russia and now lives in the UK with a new identity, told his version of events to The Daily Mail. He claims to have a source high up in Russian intelligence services.

Mr William’s dead body was found locked in a bag in his Pimlico flat in 2010. He has been a codebreaker at GCHQ but at the time was on secondment to MI6 at their offices in Vauxhall, London.

A coroner ruled in 2012 that the spy was “probably killed unlawfully”, but also ruled it unlikely his death will ever be “satisfactorily explained”.

Reports that Mr Williams, 31, died from a sex game gone wrong were also dismissed by coroner, Dr Fiona Wilcox who said there was no evidence to suggest claustrophilia — a desire for confinement in enclosed spaces.

Mr. Karpichkov claims a Russian double agent working at GCHQ set his sights on recruiting codebreaker Mr Williams to work for the SVR, formerly known as the KGB.

The ‘mole’, known as ‘Orion,’ befriended Mr. Williams in his recruitment bid, and introduced him to a third party named 'Lukas', according to Mr Karpichkov. 

When Mr. Williams traveled to Las Vegas for a specialist computer hacking convention, he encountered Lukas and they both visited a nightclub.

Mr. Karpichkov alleges that Lukas was aware of rumors that Mr. Williams cross-dressed and visited gay night clubs, and used this as a mechanism to blackmail the codebreaker.

Suggestions that Mr. Williams enjoyed cross-dressing and bondage were dismissed by Dr. Wilcox during the inquiry into his death, she said: “I wonder if this was an attempt by some third party to manipulate the evidence” and that “Gareth was naked in a bag when he was found, not cross-dressed, not in high-heeled shoes.”

Allegedly, Mr. Williams drink was spiked and he passed out in a rented home in the US.  Photographs were then taken of him in bed next to a man and woman and ecstasy tablets were planted in his pocket.

The photos were used to force Mr Williams to cooperate, otherwise his friends and family would see them, says Mr. Karpichkov.

The plot to use the photographs for blackmail was  unsuccessful, according to Mr. Karpichkov, as the Welsh-born spy told Lukas he knew ‘Orion’ must have informed him.

Fearing that the double agents identity would be revealed at GCHQ, Mr. Williams was then murdered by hitmen through a poisonous injection in the ear, alleges Mr. Karpichkov. 

Dr. Wilcox said in 2012 that the involvement of intelligence services in Mr. Williams’ death was a “legitimate line of inquiry,” but there was no actual evidence to support this.

Read more
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/former-kgb-major-says-gareth-williams-was-blackmailed-into-becoming-a-double-agent-and-killed-when-a6707141.html#gallery
Posted by Anonymous at 6:51:00 PM 0 comments

Spacex Rocket that Blew Up Yesterday


The Spacex Rocket that Blew Up Yesterday was Definitely not a Technical Glitch

Posted by | Sep 2, 2016 | ,



 Thanks Siminthesky!
JimStone.is
September 1, 2016

 

It looks like a UFO took it out.

Yesterday (September 1 2016) a spacex rocket with a $150 million dollar Facebook satellite that was a creation of Zukerberg and Israel blew up during testing, and not during launch. Before it blew up, a UFO showed up, fired something at the rocket, and then quickly flew away. The image here shows the UFO quite clearly. 

SpaceX Facebook Rocket Explodes


If Spacex can’t explain what this UFO is, then I am going to say that either off world help arrived to keep Facebook grounded or white hats in American intelligence destroyed this rocket to keep something evil from being launched.

This UFO appears to be between the rocket and the camera filming the explosion, and the similar focus on the rocket and the object proves the object was close to the rocket and not close to the camera. It is not a bird, insect, or balloon or anything else of the sort. Its speed has been estimated by some people to have been about 500 MPH. It entered on the right hand side of the frame, fired something at the rocket when it was immediately in front of it, and exited the left hand side of the frame.

Obviously there are those trying to say this was a bird or insect or whatever, but this is one case where we got an image that quite clearly shows that cannot possibly be what this was.

This explosion started at the top of the rocket, right where the UFO was, and not near the bottom, where virtually all rocket explosions start. No malfunction caused this.  If this started at the top of the rocket, only a fuel tank breach in an upper stage that was not being tested could have caused this, and that means the rocket was most likely shot with something.

Important: Original reports were that this happened when they were test firing the main engines before launch and not during refueling, as is being said now, which could (tenuously) be used as an explanation for this. But original reports said nothing about refueling, and that there was an engine test underway, which means an explosion at the top of the rocket due to a glitch is not in any way plausible.

There are a few people in the alternative media that are claiming that there is a war going on in space, and that something off world is trying to help us. If this object is from off world and it blew up a Facebook satellite, I’d have to say someone is trying to help because I can’t imagine what was actually on that rocket if it was a completely Jewish/Israeli project and cost $150 million.

That would be a GOOD rocket blast as far as I see it, and as far as I see it, this was not a technical glitch.  This was caused. The only question is, who did it?
I find it interesting that this particular object looks like a text book UFO. Obviously, the video of this is going to get edited.

UPDATE: The original video that had this has already been blocked on Youtube, I can’t get to it anymore with links saying the 'connection failed'. At least this is a nice clear screen capture. And I’d bet that if this video does appear again, the UFO will suddenly have flapping wings or some other B.S.

In the original video, however, what you see in this frame is what it was.

Some people are speculating that it was someone like Soros who blew this rocket up because they do not want space to be privatized. However, my take on this is that if this was a 100 percent Jewish project that was destroyed, no one in the world’s power structure (which is now almost entirely Jewish) did this from the top down. 

I could be wrong, maybe there are disagreements, but I think it is far more probable that this was done by white hats, or “outside help”, because nothing could be worse (or wanted by the 'elite') more than scamming Facebook going orbital compliments of Israel. We don’t know what that satellite really was.

Updated video amended to this post by Freewill

Watch this video of the explosion. Pay very close to the 1:11 minute mark as an object comes in from the top right part of the picture and impacts the rocket just below the top section...
~Freewill

http://galacticconnection.com/the-spacex-rocket-that-blew-up-yesterday-was-definitely-not-a-technical-glitch/?mc_cid=4d225a21f6&mc_eid=77af0dee57
Posted by Anonymous at 2:18:00 PM 1 comments

Hillary Threatens War With Russia


Hillary Threatens War With Russia

And the media doesn't even report on it

 
Paul Joseph Watson - September 2, 2016
 
 
 Hillary Threatens War With Russia 
  Paul Joseph Watson
 
 
Posted by Anonymous at 12:50:00 PM 3 comments

BASIC ECONOMICS 101


BASIC  ECONOMICS  101

 
This rather brilliantly cuts thru all the political double speak we get.
It puts it into a much better perspective…..

Lesson # 1:
* U.S. Tax revenue: $2,170,000,000,000
* Fed budget: $3,820,000,000,000
* New debt: $ 1,650,000,000,000
* National debt: $19,271,000,000,000
* Recent budget cuts: $ 38,500,000,000

Let's now remove 8 zeros and pretend it's a household budget:
* Annual family income: $21,700
* Money the family spent: $38,200
* New debt on the credit card: $16,500
* Outstanding balance on the credit card: $192,710
* Total budget cuts so far: $385

Got It ?????
OK now Lesson # 2:
 
Here's another way to look at the Debt Ceiling:

Let's say, You come home from work and find there has been a sewer
backup in your neighborhood....and your home has sewage all the way up
to your ceilings.

What do you think you should do ......

Raise the ceilings, or pump out the crap?

Your choice is coming in November.

Posted by Anonymous at 12:32:00 PM 0 comments

Friday, September 2, 2016

Nuremberg Trials


null

Held for the purpose of bringing Nazi war criminals to justice, the Nuremberg trials were a series of 13 trials carried out in Nuremberg, Germany, between 1945 and 1949. The defendants, who included Nazi Party officials and high-ranking military officers along with German industrialists, lawyers and doctors, were indicted on such charges as crimes against peace and crimes against humanity. Nazi leader Adolf Hitler (1889-1945) committed suicide and was never brought to trial. Although the legal justifications for the trials and their procedural innovations were controversial at the time, the Nuremberg trials are now regarded as a milestone toward the establishment of a permanent international court, and an important precedent for dealing with later instances of genocide and other crimes against humanity.


Shortly after Adolf Hitler came to power as chancellor of Germany in 1933, he and his Nazi government began implementing policies designed to persecute German-Jewish people and other perceived enemies of the Nazi state. Over the next decade, these policies grew increasingly repressive and violent and resulted, by the end of World War II (1939-45), in the systematic, state-sponsored murder of some 6 million European Jews (along with an estimated 4 million to 6 million non-Jews).


In December 1942, the Allied leaders of Great Britain, the United States and the Soviet Union “issued the first joint declaration officially noting the mass murder of European Jewry and resolving to prosecute those responsible for violence against civilian populations,” according to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM). Joseph Stalin (1878-1953), the Soviet leader, initially proposed the execution of 50,000 to 100,000 German staff officers. British Prime Minister Winston Churchill (1874-1965) discussed the possibility of summary execution (execution without a trial) of high-ranking Nazis, but was persuaded by American leaders that a criminal trial would be more effective. Among other advantages, criminal proceedings would require documentation of the crimes charged against the defendants and prevent later accusations that the defendants had been condemned without evidence.
There were many legal and procedural difficulties to overcome in setting up the Nuremberg trials. First, there was no precedent for an international trial of war criminals. There were earlier instances of prosecution for war crimes, such as the execution of Confederate army officer Henry Wirz (1823-65) for his maltreatment of Union prisoners of war during the American Civil War (1861-65); and the courts-martial held by Turkey in 1919-20 to punish those responsible for the Armenian genocide of 1915-16. However, these were trials conducted according to the laws of a single nation rather than, as in the case of the Nuremberg trials, a group of four powers (France, Britain, the Soviet Union and the U.S.) with different legal traditions and practices.
The Allies eventually established the laws and procedures for the Nuremberg trials with the London Charter of the International Military Tribunal (IMT), issued on August 8, 1945. Among other things, the charter defined three categories of crimes: crimes against peace (including planning, preparing, starting or waging wars of aggression or wars in violation of international agreements), war crimes (including violations of customs or laws of war, including improper treatment of civilians and prisoners of war) and crimes against humanity (including murder, enslavement or deportation of civilians or persecution on political, religious or racial grounds). It was determined that civilian officials as well as military officers could be accused of war crimes.
The city of Nuremberg (also known as Nurnberg) in the German state of Bavaria was selected as the location for the trials because its Palace of Justice was relatively undamaged by the war and included a large prison area. Additionally, Nuremberg had been the site of annual Nazi propaganda rallies; holding the postwar trials there marked the symbolic end of Hitler’s government, the Third Reich.
The best-known of the Nuremberg trials was the Trial of Major War Criminals, held from November 20, 1945, to October 1, 1946. The format of the trial was a mix of legal traditions: There were prosecutors and defense attorneys according to British and American law, but the decisions and sentences were imposed by a tribunal (panel of judges) rather than a single judge and a jury. The chief American prosecutor was Robert H. Jackson (1892-1954), an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Each of the four Allied powers supplied two judges–a main judge and an alternate.
Twenty-four individuals were indicted, along with six Nazi organizations determined to be criminal (such as the “Gestapo,” or secret state police). One of the indicted men was deemed medically unfit to stand trial, while a second man killed himself before the trial began. Hitler and two of his top associates, Heinrich Himmler (1900-45) and Joseph Goebbels (1897-45), had each committed suicide in the spring of 1945 before they could be brought to trial. The defendants were allowed to choose their own lawyers, and the most common defense strategy was that the crimes defined in the London Charter were examples of ex post facto law; that is, they were laws that criminalized actions committed before the laws were drafted. Another defense was that the trial was a form of victor’s justice–the Allies were applying a harsh standard to crimes committed by Germans and leniency to crimes committed by their own soldiers.
As the accused men and judges spoke four different languages, the trial saw the introduction of a technological innovation taken for granted today: instantaneous translation. IBM provided the technology and recruited men and women from international telephone exchanges to provide on-the-spot translations through headphones in English, French, German and Russian.
In the end, the international tribunal found all but three of the defendants guilty. Twelve were sentenced to death, one in absentia, and the rest were given prison sentences ranging from 10 years to life behind bars. Ten of the condemned were executed by hanging on October 16, 1946. Hermann GΓΆring (1893-1946), Hitler’s designated successor and head of the “Luftwaffe” (German air force), committed suicide the night before his execution with a cyanide capsule he had hidden in a jar of skin medication.
Following the Trial of Major War Criminals, there were 12 additional trials held at Nuremberg. These proceedings, lasting from December 1946 to April 1949, are grouped together as the Subsequent Nuremberg Proceedings. They differed from the first trial in that they were conducted before U.S. military tribunals rather than the international tribunal that decided the fate of the major Nazi leaders. The reason for the change was that growing differences among the four Allied powers had made other joint trials impossible. The subsequent trials were held in the same location at the Palace of Justice in Nuremberg.
These proceedings included the Doctors Trial (December 9, 1946-August 20, 1947), in which 23 defendants were accused of crimes against humanity, including medical experiments on prisoners of war. In the Judges Trial (March 5-December 4, 1947), 16 lawyers and judges were charged with furthering the Nazi plan for racial purity by implementing the eugenics laws of the Third Reich. Other subsequent trials dealt with German industrialists accused of using slave labor and plundering occupied countries; high-ranking army officers accused of atrocities against prisoners of war; and SS officers accused of violence against concentration camp inmates. Of the 185 people indicted in the subsequent Nuremberg trials, 12 defendants received death sentences, 8 others were given life in prison and an additional 77 people received prison terms of varying lengths, according to the USHMM. Authorities later reduced a number of the sentences.
The Nuremberg trials were controversial even among those who wanted the major criminals punished. Harlan Stone (1872-1946), chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court at the time, described the proceedings as a “sanctimonious fraud” and a “high-grade lynching party.” William O. Douglas (1898-1980), then an associate U.S. Supreme Court justice, said the Allies “substituted power for principle” at Nuremberg.
Nonetheless, most observers considered the trials a step forward for the establishment of international law. The findings at Nuremberg led directly to the United Nations Genocide Convention (1948) and Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), as well as the Geneva Convention on the Laws and Customs of War (1949). In addition, the International Military Tribunal supplied a useful precedent for the trials of Japanese war criminals in Tokyo (1946-48); the 1961 trial of Nazi leader Adolf Eichmann (1906-62); and the establishment of tribunals for war crimes committed in the former Yugoslavia (1993) and in Rwanda (1994).
Posted by Freewill at 11:36:00 PM 1 comments

Canadian $2 Coin

CURRENCY NEWS FROM CANADA…..

The Royal Canadian Mint has just announced they are going to remove the polar bear from the $2 coin in view of its demise due to global warming!


Canadian $2 Coin

At the height of political correctness, they will replace it with two gay deer.


Canadian $2 Coin

The coin will now be called “ two fu#@in’ bucks
Posted by Freewill at 11:06:00 PM 1 comments

Pussification: Toy Gun from 1960’s Would be Banned Today

Regressive left has attempted to instill Americans with sense of fear regarding guns

Pussification: Toy Gun from 1960’s Would be Banned Today

A toy commercial from the 1960s illustrates exactly how far American society has shifted in recent years on the issue of firearms.

In the television ad from toy-maker Mattel, a young boy fires and reloads one of the most realistic replica revolver pistols ever created, complete with smoke and loud “Bang!” sound effect.

“You are watching a demonstration of the most authentic cap pistol in the world,” an announcer says. “It has exclusive panning action, and shoots safe shooting shells with greenie stickem caps.

“The gun and hip slung Mattel holster are specially made for a fast draw.”

“Every boy will walk tall when he wears a holster and pistol with a Mattel brand,” the ad says.

In modern society, the regressive left has attempted to instill Americans with a sense of fear regarding guns.

The issue has gotten so out-of-hand that some schools have implemented ridiculous zero tolerance policies targeting anything even remotely resembling guns.

Recent cases over the years in which children were punished in school over “gun” incidents (that didn’t even involve a gun) include the infamous Hello Kitty bubble gun ‘terroristic’ incident, the miniature lego gun school bus massacre, the plastic toy soldier holding a gun on a cup cake catastrophe, and the perilous pencil pointing ‘pow powers’ of Virginia.

The extent to which modern liberals are terrified by the inanimate objects reached new heights of absurdity when students at the University of Texas in Austin protested concealed campus carry with sex toys.

The left’s attempt to indoctrinate Americans into fearing firearms is just another indication of the “pussification” of the US, as highlighted recently by Hollywood actor Clint Eastwood.

Posted by Freewill at 10:49:00 PM 0 comments

Homeland Security To Save Us From 'Rigged Elections'?



Why We Should Eliminate the 'Department of Homeland Security'

Let's dismantle the Frankenstein monster and divide its responsibilities more effectively


| June 23, 2015


Homeland Security To Save Us From 'Rigged Elections'?  
Or to make sure the cabal's choice 'wins' the election?

The U.S.A. criminal Nazi crime syndicate's creation, Department of Homeland Security, the equivalent of the Nazi SS, makes no secret of its plans to STEAL THE UPCOMING ELECTION.  

The DHS is NOT a valid 'government' department, but a 'sister corporation' spun from the criminal U.S.A. corporation of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, A  CRIME SYNDICATE OPERATING OUT OF Washington, DC.  

America, what are you going to do to insure that the upcoming election is HONEST and that the candidate truly elected by the people is the one to occupy the office? 

DHS and Soros with the help of others are right now putting plans in place to STEAL the upcoming election.   You can safely bet that Hitlery Clinton will be announced - way before the votes have even been cast and counted -  as the 'winner' when all honest polls are showing that Trump is waaaaaaay out in front of Clinton, and that Clinton cannot possibly 'win'. She cannot even draw enough people to her appearances to even rent a room much less acquire enough votes to win.

DHS/UN Announce They Are 
Openly Stealing The Election 
Alex Jones


Alert! DHS To Take Control Of 2016 Election 
After "Foreign Hackers" Breach US Voting System


Homeland Security To Save Us 
From 'Rigged Elections'?
Ron Paul



Posted by Anonymous at 10:20:00 PM 2 comments

Why We Should Eliminate the Department of Homeland Security


Why  We  Should  Eliminate  the  Department  of  Homeland  Security

Let's  dismantle  the  Frankenstein  monster  and  divide  its  responsibilities  more effectively.



| June 23, 2015



After the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack, President George W. Bush rightly resisted Congress' urge to create a new federal department charged with the homeland security mission. Bush believed the federal government could protect America with a strong homeland security council managed by the White House, similar to the National Security Council. Following relentless pressure, he acquiesced and the federal government gave birth to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on March 1, 2003.

The new department largely consists of agencies and offices pulled from other existing cabinet departments. After twelve years of mediocre-to-poor operations and countless scandals, it is clear President Bush's initial instinct was right. The core functions overseen by DHS can be managed more effectively elsewhere, especially where territorial battles undermine operational efficacy.

It is time to eliminate DHS and put the various components where they are a better fit. Eliminating DHS would result in annual fiscal savings of more than $2.5 billion, with 4,000 fewer employees. Those reductions, however, only represent part of the rationale for eliminating DHS. The other reasons to do so are that DHS is riddled with performance inefficiencies and that its existence creates inefficiencies in other federal entities due to the need to coordinate across organizational boundaries. America can't afford more of the same as terrorist threats reemerge.

With a new President getting elected in a year-and-a-half, starting this discussion now hopefully will spur proponents and opponents to enter the fray, and help presidential candidates to think about how they might more efficiently and effectively protect America during their time in office.

I spent nearly two and a half years at DHS where I first oversaw the terrorism grant, training, and exercise programs for state and local governments under Secretary Tom Ridge. When Michael Chertoff took over, I became the Counselor to the Deputy Secretary on policy and operational issues. My time included the response to Hurricane Katrina. In the nine years since I left DHS, I likely have written more on DHS than just about anyone, including a book, Homeland Security and Federalism: Protecting America from Outside the Beltway.

It goes without saying that I observed up-close the dysfunction, turf battles, and inherent limitations in an entity that does so much. These problems are exacerbated due to the fact that, in many cases, the activities DHS engages in require enormous coordination with entities embedded in other federal departments.

For example, the Transportation Security Administration must continually coordinate with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) given the overlap among their responsibilities. By moving the non-air components to DOT and the air components to the FAA, decisions would be made more quickly and without the turf battles between department heads.

Similarly, with the creation of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Americas' Security Affairs, having the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) outside of the U.S. Department of Defense is nonsensical. Syncing the four military branches that focus on our external threats with the military branch that secures our domestic waterways will enable unified command and control capabilities and streamlined support systems.

Two entities within DHS that would align better elsewhere are U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) and its Ombudsman. USCIS's functions are closely associated with the U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Consular Affairs (BCA). A quick look at their respective mission statements shows how similar the two entities are. The mission of USCIS is:
USCIS will secure America's promise as a nation of immigrants by providing accurate and useful information to our customers, granting immigration and citizenship benefits, promoting an awareness and understanding of citizenship, and ensuring the integrity of our immigration system.
The mission of BCA is:
The mission of the Bureau of Consular Affairs (CA) is to protect the lives and interests of American citizens abroad and to strengthen the security of United States borders through the vigilant adjudication of visas and passports. CA contributes significantly to the USG goal of promoting international exchange and understanding. Our vision is to help American citizens engage the world. The Bureau issues the travel documents that allow Americans to travel the globe and lawful immigrants and visitors to travel to America and provides essential cycle of life services to American citizens overseas.
With such similar missions, what efficiencies and effectiveness measures are gained by having these entities in separate departments? BCA's more extensive mission easily could absorb USCIS's complementary functions.

A final example is the domestic federal law enforcement functions within U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Those two entities consistently must coordinate with numerous elements at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), including: the Federal Bureau of Investigation; the Drug Enforcement Administration; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives; and the U.S. Attorneys. By having those entities under a separate cabinet official, the opportunity for turf battles and arbitrage are heightened.

Equally problematic is the multi-headed hydra faced by state and local law enforcement. With a large portion of state and local terrorism funding residing at DHS and ICE's existence in the department, state and local law enforcement must contend with multiple intelligence entities (DHS' weak fusion centers, DOJ's Joint Terrorism Task Forces, and the FBI's Field Intelligence Groups), coordinating bodies, and funding offices. This fragmentation only ensures that key items will fall through the cracks between these departments, whose personnel spend far too much time fighting each other for primacy than they should. Our enemies couldn't ask for a more fertile environment within which to attack us.

During my time at DHS, I unfortunately spent too much time fending off fiefdom building efforts by Michael Brown and his staff at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) over the $3.5 billion terrorism grant programs that I ran and Brown wanted. During the transition from Secretary Ridge to Secretary Chertoff, Brown and I engaged in a running debate over whether preparedness functions should reside outside or inside of FEMA. I won the debate when Secretary Chertoff keep the terrorism preparedness functions outside of FEMA.

At the time, I focused on the importance of protecting terrorism preparedness operations from the constant operational natural disaster response and recovery tempo of FEMA. I made the case that terrorism preparedness operations tended to wither on the vine because FEMA needed to divert resources to ensure successful responses to natural disasters. With the ever-increasing natural disaster declarations coming out of FEMA since 1993, I had real concerns in our post-9/11 environment that terrorism would play second fiddle to the nationalization of natural disasters.

In the congressional actions after Hurricane Katrina, FEMA finally got the terrorism preparedness functions it had long sought. Though it's hard to admit, I have to concede that combining the preparedness, response, and recovery elements in FEMA hasn't resulted in terrorism preparedness getting weakened. That doesn't mean it has improved, either. Much of FEMA's recent success is due to the excellent leadership of FEMA Administrator Craig Fugate combined with the limited number of major natural disasters during the Obama Administration. The experience of the FEMA Administrator is clearly critical to its operational success.

In fact, given how often the FEMA Administrator interacts with the President, creating a layer of secretarial management between the two makes little sense. Having the FEMA Administrator report, instead, directly to the president is especially important because it simply reflects the reality of what happens anyway when a major natural disaster strike America. FEMA should once again become a stand-alone agency. That said, the terrorism-related grants, training, and exercise programs should revert back to DOJ, thereby strengthening the connection among domestic terrorism entities in federal, state, and local governments.

As for the U.S. Secret Service, its main mission is:
to ensure the security of our President, our Vice President, their families, the White House, the Vice President's Residence, national and visiting world leaders, former Presidents, and events of national significance. The Secret Service also protects the integrity of our currency and investigates crimes against our national financial system committed by criminals around the world and in cyberspace.
Given that very specific mission, the Director should report directly to the person his agency is charged with protecting. Perhaps the scandals and failures of the last few years are due to the agency's lost standing incumbent with being placed in the bowels of a department. It is hard to think that reporting directly to the president will not up the accountability level.

Beyond the fiscal savings of eliminating inefficient and, at times, ineffective layers of management, operations should improve. Things certainly couldn't get worse. As DHS Inspector General and U.S. Government Accountability Office reports over the last twelve years unequivocally demonstrate, DHS has not been a model of success. To boot, surveys of personnel consistently show that DHS employees have the lowest morale in the 'federal government'.

As the saying goes, when you find yourself in a hole, it is wise to stop digging. Good intentions led to creating a new cabinet department with 180,000 employees and a nearly $38 billion budget that has ballooned to 240,000 employees and a $61 billion budget. Those increases represent a 33 percent jump in employees and a 61 percent budgetary explosion in just 12 years. More people and money did not result in better outcomes.

My proposed reorganization may not be correct on all counts, but it would be better than the status quo. Spending another decade allowing a department to grow even larger while it continues to get weak results will only ensure it becomes yet another permanent, and ineffective, federal bureaucracy. We can and should do better. 

President Bush instinctively had it right. It's now time we fix what politics got wrong.

http://reason.com/archives/2015/06/23/president-bush-was-right-before-he-was-w

It is past time to rid ourselves of the Nazi facist regime and return our nation and government to its original Republic and common law.

 

 
Posted by Anonymous at 10:14:00 PM 0 comments

David Oates, provides reverse speech of 3 Hillary Clinton campaign appearances


Reverse speech analyst, David Oates, provides reverse speech of 3 Hillary Clinton campaign appearances


Reverse Speech Analysis of Hillary Clinton
at the DNC July 2016


 
Reverse Speech Analysis of Hillary Clinton
in San Diego June 2 2016  


 
Reverse Speech of Sanders
Endorsing Clinton
July 12 2016



Posted by Anonymous at 9:22:00 PM 0 comments

Agenda 21, The Plan To Kill You - David Icke

 
The United Nations Depopulation Plan
Agenda 21, The Plan To Kill You 
David Icke




Posted by Anonymous at 9:14:00 PM 0 comments

David Icke : ISIS - Made in America






ISIS,  MADE  IN  AMERICA   The  David  Icke  Videocast

Friday, September 2, 2016 10:20
 
  
 
 
ISIS - Made in America
 
 
 
Posted by Anonymous at 9:02:00 PM 0 comments

Mainstream Media Admits It May “Never Recover” from 2016 Election

Link: http://theantimedia.org/mainstream-media-admits-never-recover-2016-election/

Carey Wedler

(ANTIMEDIA) In a revealing statement that flew largely under the radar earlier this month, the mainstream media admitted it would never recover from its irresponsible and negligent coverage of the 2016 presidential election. A recent column published in the New York Post referred to the media’s reporting as “the complete collapse of American journalism as we know it.”

In his article for the Post, Fox News contributor Michael Goodwin discussed the media’s pro-Clinton bias – one recognized by supporters of virtually every other presidential candidate, from Bernie Sanders to Jill Stein to Gary Johnson and, of course, Donald Trump. Even Americans who don’t necessarily have a horse in the 2016 race notice the slant.

“By torching its remaining credibility in service of Clinton,” Goodwin wrote, “the mainstream media’s reputations will likely never recover, nor will the standards. No future producer, editor, reporter or anchor can be expected to meet a test of fairness when that standard has been trashed in such willful and blatant fashion.”

Indeed, he is correct in this regard. The Clinton machine has effectively infiltrated corporate media. Last year, the Intercept reported MSNBC failed to disclose that multiple pundits who spoke favorably about Clinton were actually employees of a consulting firm hired by her campaign.

More recently, embarrassing DNC leaks released in July revealed DNC officials attempted to craft narratives painting Sanders in a negative light to undermine his campaign. They also organized a secret fundraiser with the Washington Post and were careful to keep it under the radar. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the now-disgraced former chairman of the DNC, along with one of her colleagues, personally contacted MSNBC to complain when one of its anchors criticized Clinton and suggested she drop out. Per a “deal” with the DNC, one POLITICO writer sent an article critical of Clinton to the DNC for suggestions before he sent it to his editor.

Though Goodwin has previously implied he does not support the Republican nominee, he still argues “Any reporter who agrees with Clinton about Trump has no business covering either candidate.”

There is no question the mainstream media has sided with the political establishment in its decision to craft narratives that paint Clinton as a competent leader who is the only option in the face of a catastrophic Trump presidency. Indeed, in spite of Clinton’s lack of popularity among the general population, the media continues to suggest she is the only thing standing between America and its descent into fascism.
 
While the degree of negative press Trump has received is undeniably staggering, Goodwin failed to recognize — at least in this article — that like Clinton, Trump is wildly unpopular and dangerous. Though mainstream media is undoubtedly fervent in their coverage of Trump’s absurdity, it is arguably irresponsible not to point out the gaping problems with his xenophobic, violent, non-factual rhetoric.
But therein lies the problem: rarely does the mainstream media devote as much time to questioning Hillary Clinton, her rhetoric, and her policies. As the Hill noted earlier this month:

“Some would argue that Trump deserves it because of controversial rhetoric or falsehoods around X, Y, Z… [But] when looking at honesty/trustworthy numbers, it’s Clinton who — in the eyes of the public — has more issues in that department.”

As Politifact documented, Clinton has lied on multiple occasions, and the media’s lack of outrage and refusal to focus on her dishonesty lends credence to Goodwin’s assertions.

Goodwin’s rhetoric is openly right-wing, though he voted for Obama in 2008 and in 2012 claimed to be a Democrat. He appears regularly on Fox News and has previously asserted President Obama is not doing enough to combat Islamic extremism. And though he is correct in pointing out the pro-Clinton bias, his employment at the New York Post and ongoing appearances on Fox — two icons of mainstream media — obliterate any chance of his media criticisms being taken seriously.

The New York Post has been owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. since 1976. In that time, the Post has developed a reputation forsensationalism and inaccurate reporting. While they deserve mild credit for covering controversial issues like police brutality and the secrecy and corruption surrounding the infamous 28-pages of the 9/11 commission report, a long line of ethical controversies mars their credibility — so much so that even a Fox News anchor has questioned the paper’s legitimacy.

Little needs to be said about Fox News’ out of touch, delusional take on the world, though it is worth noting that according to an analysis by Politifact, 58 percent of Fox News’ content is mostly false, false, or “pants on fire.”
The reputations of the New York Post and Fox News precede Goodwin’s argument, no matter how true it may be that the media is in Hillary Clinton’s pocket. What his assertion should have contended is that American journalism was a lost cause long before the 2016 election — something Americans have increasingly and rightfully begun to recognize.

From the corporate media’s flagrantly irresponsible coverage of the Iraq War during the Bush years to the media’s ongoing blackouts of relevant news in favor of more superficial, inconsequential stories, Goodwin’s assertion that 2016 is the year American journalism died is as factual as the content churned out by Fox News.

2016 has merely been its funeral procession.
Posted by Freewill at 8:15:00 PM 2 comments

"I thought you should know"

Posted by Freewill at 7:22:00 PM 1 comments

FBI Just Made a Massive Move Against Hillary Clinton


hillary fbiSURPRISE!  BREAKING  NEWS!  FBI  JUST  MADE  A  MASSIVE  MOVE  AGAINST  HILLARY  CLINTON!






 
 
Kosar
Featured Contributor
The Political Insider
 
In recent weeks, the State Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) have been pushing against each other over FOIA requests for details of Hillary Clinton’s criminal investigation.

While the FBI, for political reasons, ultimately decided not to prosecute, they did have an extensive investigation into the corruption at the Clinton Foundation and Secretary of State’s office, where Hillary Clinton sold access to foreign donors.

The State Department wants records to be delayed until after the election. But now, the FBI will officially release their full report to the Justice Department, including investigative materials and additional notes no one has seen before.

This is bad news for Hillary!
The release is in response to numerous FOIA requests including from CNN.
Also to be released is Hillary Clinton’s 302, the FBI agent notes from Clinton’s voluntary interview at FBI headquarters. The report is about 30 pages, and the 302 is about a dozen pages according to the officials.[…]
Last month, FBI Director James Comey recommended against charges for Clinton for her use of a private email server while she was secretary of state, but he did describe her behavior as “extremely careless” with classified material.
Via CNN
While the liberal media is on Hillary Clinton’s side, she won’t be able to hide from these new details surrounding her pay-to-play corruption at the State Department. Many sources inside the intelligence community are furious that no charges were filed, because Hillary Clinton’s crimes are actually worse than has been reported. Now, we will find out the truth.

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/hillary-fbi-just-made-massive-move-against-clinton/?utm_source=SailThru%26utm_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=TPI%20Newsletter%2009-02-16%20Friday%20Best%20of%20Week&utm_term=New%20Friday%20Active%20Users


Posted by Anonymous at 11:39:00 AM 7 comments

2nd amendment

2nd amendment
Posted by Freewill at 12:54:00 AM 6 comments

Hermine looms as first hurricane to make landfall in Florida in 11 years

Hermine is bearing down on Florida and will deliver heavy rain, gusty winds, flooding and the risk of tornadoes into Friday.
The storm became a Category 1 hurricane shortly before 3 p.m. EDT Thursday.
The last hurricane to make landfall in Florida was Wilma in 2005.
This is a closeup live loop of Hermine. (NOAA/Satellite)
The center of Hermine has made the anticipated northeastward turn and is located about 20 miles southeast of Apalachicola, Florida, and 95 miles west of Cedar Key, Florida.
"We expect Hermine make landfall north of Tampa, in the Big Bend of Florida during late Thursday night into early Friday morning," according to AccuWeather Hurricane Expert Dan Kottlowski.

In advance of the storm, Florida Gov. Rick Scott declared a State of Emergency to help 51 counties prepare. A mandatory evacuation notice has been issued for Franklin County, located along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico on the Florida Panhandle.
Several Florida schools have announced closings on Thursday or Friday due to the storm. Florida State University's main campus in Tallahassee, Florida, will be closed from noon Thursday into Friday, officials announced Thursday morning. University of South Florida in Tampa will also be closed on Friday.
Some airlines are waving flight change fees in the path of the storm.
The storm will unload a general 4-8 inches of rain with locally 12-18 inches possible. This rainfall is enough to cause urban and low-lying area flooding.
Near and just south of the center of Hermine, onshore winds will push Gulf of Mexico water landward and are likely to cause coastal flooding. Major cities that can be affected by coastal flooding include Tampa and St. Petersburg, Florida, even if the storm makes landfall 100 miles or more to the north.
In addition to the risk of flooding, locally severe thunderstorms will have the potential to bring damaging wind gusts. Near and shortly after the storm makes landfall, there will be a significant risk of waterspouts and tornadoes being spawned in central and northern Florida.

Florida cities that will be at risk for tornadoes include Tampa, Orlando, Ocala, The Villages, Melbourne, Gainesville, Jacksonville, Daytona Beach and Tallahassee.
The risk of isolated tornadoes will extend northeastward into parts of Georgia and the Carolinas into Friday.
People in the central and northern part of the Florida Peninsula and the eastern part of the Florida Panhandle should be prepared for tropical storm to minimal hurricane conditions with power outages, flooded roads and airline disruptions.
Sea and surf conditions will be dangerous along the Florida west coast into Friday and along the upper east coast Thursday night into Saturday.
RELATED:
Hermine may ruin East Coast Labor Day weekend plans
2016 US Open: Will Hermine disrupt play this weekend?
REPORTS: Hurricane Hermine bears down on Florida
After traversing the Florida Peninsula on Thursday night, the storm will continue northeastward across part of Georgia on Friday. In this position, rough surf, gusty winds and heavy rains will lash coastal areas.

The storm is likely to bring a period of torrential rainfall and raise the risk of flash and urban flooding over portions of Georgia and the Carolinas, despite prior dryness issues. The risk of power outages will continue on a sporadic level. Coastal flooding is also likely.
Significant impact from Hermine will not be limited to the southeastern U.S.
Beyond the Carolinas on Saturday, Hermine may ruin coastal Northeast Labor Day weekend plans.
Posted by Freewill at 12:49:00 AM 0 comments
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)