Turkey's new military pact with Qatar

Revealed: Secret details of Turkey's new military pact with Qatar

 

Nations for the 'end-day's war are lining up

 

 

June 8, 2017

Source: middle east eye

 

In December 2015, Turkey announced, to the surprise of many, that it planned to establish a military base in Qatar. Behind the scenes, the agreement was about forming a major strategic alliance.

After a 100-year hiatus, Turkey is militarily back in the Gulf and ramping up its presence overseas. In January, Ankara announced that it would also establish a military base in Somalia.

Specific details about the Qatar agreement, which Turkey described as an alliance in the face of "common enemies", remain scant, but Middle East Eye has acquired copies of the agreements, as well as further details, which include a secret pledge by Ankara to protect Qatar from external threats.

A long time coming?

Turkish-Qatari defence and military agreements go back nearly a decade. In 2007, Ankara and Doha signed a defence industry cooperation agreement, and in 2012, signed a military training agreement.

In March 2015, the Turkey-Qatar Military Cooperation Agreement was passed by the Turkish parliament, but the negotiations to create an overarching comprehensive agreement were still ongoing. 

Only in July 2015, according to France-based Intelligence Online, did the Qatari Emir, Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani, first tell the Saudi king about the true extent of the agreement. 

Under the agreement, about 3,000 Turkish troops, air and naval units, as well as special forces are to be based in Qatar for training and joint exercises. 

The two countries also promised greater bilateral cooperation between intelligence services.

Riyadh reportedly welcomed the deal to help counter Iran's growing regional influence as Turkey's military's presence will bring additional foreign muscle in the Gulf, joining the United States' Al Udeid air base in Qatar, the French naval base in Abu Dhabi, and the US and British naval bases in Bahrain, among others.

But the move was not unanimously accepted in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). When Abu Dhabi got wind of the agreement in the wake of the 35th GCC summit in December, it was not viewed positively, with the Emirates fearing stronger Turkish-Qatari ties could reverse the regional fortunes of the down-on-its-heels Muslim Brotherhood.

A comprehensive agreement

According to the news outlet Intelligence Online, the head of Turkey's National Intelligence Organisation (Milli Istihbarat Teskilati – MIT) made multiple trips to Doha in December to cement a secret pledge that Ankara would protect Qatar from external military threats. 

In return, Doha would help offset Ankara's strained relations with Moscow following Turkey's downing of a Russian jet. Qatar would shore up the Turkish economy due to the loss of Russian tourists – estimated at some $3bn - as well as provide gas export guarantees if Moscow turns off the taps.

While the economic assistance is a typical sweetener by Gulf states securing bilateral agreements, it is the defense pledge that is of greatest significance. Whether the pledge has been actually signed has not been reported outside of Intelligence Online. 

There is no mention of it in the comprehensive agreement that was signed in December, but talks are reportedly ongoing. “Turkey and Qatar are in the process of devising a possible 'Status of Forces Agreement'. 

In the deliberations that are said to be under way, the two sides would have discussed the incorporation of a casus foederis ["case for the alliance"] clause in the agreement,” said Dr Eyup Ersoy, an international relations expert at Turkey's Bilkent University.

“However, first, this clause, if agreed upon, could be confidential and may not be revealed to the public. Second, the substance of the clause, again if agreed upon, would be qualified. For example, it may read that Turkey will provide diplomatic and military assistance to the extent possible in case of armed aggression against Qatar. In other words, it may not be unequivocal and unconditional.”

As such, the agreement may not be overly different from unwritten pledges by the UK and the US to aid the Gulf states in the advent of an attack, last evidenced in the 1990 Gulf War. What is clear from the comprehensive agreement is that the Turkish base will be under Qatari control, with the possibility for Qatar to establish a base in Turkey.

While the agreement states that Turkey is to cover the Qatari base's expenses, there are no details about overall costs.  “Since the base is to be under Qatari military structure, it is simply a Qatari base put to the use of the Turkish military, so Doha will bear the financial costs of it,” said Ersoy. 

If this is the case, it will follow the precedent of Qatar reportedly covering the $1bn construction cost of the US's Al Udeid air base.

Strategic goals

That the two countries have become closer through the agreement has not come as a surprise. “Turkey has been pursuing a strategic relationship with Qatar for over a year. I don't think it was necessary to sign the deal as it was very obvious to anyone watching,” said Jonathan Schanzer, vice president for research at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

Ersoy, however, thinks the agreement was essential to provide a legal foundation and create political legitimacy to further Ankara's goals in the Gulf, even if the "Status of Forces Agreement" is not made public. “In my view, the ‘real’ motivation, from Turkey’s perspective, is to transform the regional alignment with Qatar into a tentative alliance. This military cooperation agreement is imperative for the sustainability of Turkey's strategic relations between Qatar, and by extension, between Turkey and the Gulf,” he said.

The two states had found a common cause in meddling in the so-called "Arab Spring", particularly in Egypt, where both support the Muslim Brotherhood as well as in Syria. Their backing of the Muslim Brotherhood had invoked the ire of other GCC states, especially the UAE and Saudi Arabia. But since the overthrow of Egyptian president Mohamed Morsi in 2013, and Riyadh last year reconciling itself with the party, Ankara is using Doha as an inroad to the rest of the Gulf.

Furthermore, Turkey is being viewed as an additional line of defence against Iran following the normalising of relations with Tehran by the West. This is considered the prime motivation for the agreement. In December, the Turkish ambassador to Qatar had told Reuters that the agreement was to face "common enemies," considered a veiled allusion to Iran. 

“I don't know if the US would fight for Qatar, as the whole region is afraid that the US has sold them out to Iran. The [Turkish] soldiers in Somalia are there for formality, to show the flag, whereas in Qatar it's a real fighting force,” said Atilla Yesilada, an Istanbul-based analyst at Global Source Partners, Inc.  

Common enemies

Turkey's move into Qatar, and the GCC's general acceptance of the deal is considered a form of security diversification. David Roberts, a lecturer in the Defense Studies Department of King’s College London, thinks that the Gulf has interpreted US strategy incorrectly, that the pivot to Asia is not about abandoning the GCC but rather a pivot away from Europe.

“There is perhaps a slight loss of confidence, and the US are blue in the face about it. What can they possibly do? They have invested huge amounts in Al Udeid, which has a major role in the US defense review,” he said. Indeed, since 2009, Al Udeid has been the headquarters of the US Central Command (CentCom), covering 20 countries in the region.

The US is considered to have approved the strategic alliance, not wishing to ruffle the feathers of either country in the current regional environment. “I'd not expect to see anything from CentCom on this, given how important the Incirlik air base [in Turkey is for strikes against the Islamic State group] and the Al Udeid base is to the US,” said Schanzer.

The US is not, however, expected to be undermined when it comes to arms deals with Qatar or the GCC at large, with Turkey only accounting for 2.4 percent of overall sales to the GCC between 2010-14 (by comparison the US is 48.1 percent and Britain 18.6 percent), according to SIPRI figures.

“For Turkey it could be a golden opportunity to develop their military-industrial complex by cashing-in with Qatar. However, they've kind of missed the boat a bit as Qatar is cutting back on spending - the military not so much - but it's not the good old days,” added Roberts.

The training aspect of the agreement also does not appear to be of major strategic important to Qatar. “What is this alliance about? If it is about military training with counterparts, Qatar already has the Brits and the Americans doing training. How many trainers do you need? And they already have a smorgasbord of international equipment, although it is another NATO country [Turkey] joining them. Qatar is in desperate need of one unified security document,” said Roberts.

 

 

http://www.blacklistednews.com/Revealed%3A_Secret_details_of_Turkey%27s_new_military_pact_with_Qatar/59029/0/38/38/Y/M.html

 

 

The "UN", Swamp Draining, and Today's Situation Report

By Anna Von Reitz

The UN is not the United Nations, in the same way that the UNITED STATES is not the United States.

By the fall of 1943 the Vichy French government knew the jig was up.  Herr Hitler's plan to borrow all he could from the Jews of Europe and then murder his priority creditors wasn't working out so well.  So the Vichy began quietly moving their own ill-gotten gains to Switzerland and not a small number of the vermin paid off Swiss officials to become Swiss citizens.  Some of these characters and their friends even took over de facto ownership of certain Swiss banks where they deposited the wealth they pillaged from their neighbors and from the dead. 

Against this general backdrop two corporations were formed in France, one was called the UN Corporation, and the other was the IMF. Both the UN Corp and the IMF were spooled up by the same group of Rothschild-Rockefeller-Railroad Baron and Big Oil interests.  This version of "UN" was and is a privately held commercial corporation created some years before the actual United Nations charter was signed. 

This then allows the same kinds of deceptively similar names deceits and frauds that arise when we mistake the UNITED STATES for the United States; by that point in history, this misuse of similar names to promote constructive fraud schemes had become completely routine.  Rumor has it that Dag Hammarskjold, the second Secretary-General of the United Nations, decried this cozy deceit and was going to expose it for what it was, but was killed before he could do so.

Thus, when the news media today is talking about "UN Peacekeeping Forces" you never know-- except by context-- whether they  are talking about commercial mercenaries hired by the UN Corp to protect its business interests or if you are talking about combined actual military forces contributed by member governments of the United Nations.  Both are called "UN Peacekeeping Forces" though obviously the nature, intent, standards, motivations, and behavior of the two so-called "Peacekeeping Forces" are dramatically different and often at odds.

One final fact needs to be added to the mix before we can wrap up the explanation you want.  There are in this world approximately a hundred stunningly large Historic Trusts.  Many of these Historic Trusts stem from the days of the Spanish Conquistadors, when vast fortunes were made and for the most part, kept, in family trusts.  These so-called Spanish Trusts have moved with their owners all over the world, so that there are heirs of Spanish gold in China, the Philippines, Indonesia, the Middle East, Turkey, England, the United States and Canada that I know of.  Other Historic Trusts started out as Royal Grants of land or gold or as similar Public Grants.  The SwissIndo Trust is only one of these many huge Historic Trusts.

So, what you are referencing as "UN-SWISSINDO" is a Joint Venture between the privately owned Vichy French Commercial Corporation calling itself the "UN Corporation" and the SWISSINDO Corporation spun off the Historic Trust of the same name.  As such UN-SWISSINDO is a commercial mercenary organization wedded to a corporation funded by a Historic Trust, both of which are basically under the control of FRANCE and the Bank of France, that is, Jacob Rothschild, and his Vichy French turned Swiss friends, and the same group of bloodline families that sponsored the IMF.  The "UN-SWISSINDO Initiative" is also being supported behind the scenes by the British Crown Corporation.

Same old crap, different day.  The UN "Peacekeeping" Mercenaries are being paid by the SWISSINDO Historic Trust and together they promote the Nazified vision of the New World Order which is also largely supported by the Roman Catholic Church under the domination of the Jesuit Order founded by yet another Spanish Soldier and Heir of the Spanish Conquest, Ignatius Loyola, whose mad dream was create a worldwide Christian government by force of arms.

So when you read that the Canadians have taken over the Vatican Bank and are cleaning it up, interpret that as: British Crown affiliates working in tandem with the Roman Catholic Church, the Vichy French UN Corporation and Swissindo Trust, and Jacob Rothschild's Bank of France interests, are helping Mom do the laundry. Or, put another way, the foxes are cleaning the hen house and building new nesting boxes for the hens.

Isn't that heart-warming?   They are all gathered round to bankrupt "Mom" -- the Vatican -- and Cousin Beth (Puerto Rico), too, to save their assets unscathed in the coming economic blood bath, and they are using old Nazi plunder to pay their private army as muscle to open up the USB Swiss Bank and plunder it of the SwissIndo Trust assets and at the same time are keeping the other Historic Trust deposits held hostage in the banks they directly control so that other Historic Trusts can't compete or do anything with their assets unless they all fund a private mercenary army themselves and start World War III against the fake "UN" and its "Peacekeeping Forces".

La, la, la, how the world does spin.  Compare this seamy underbelly with the public image of New Age light, love, and power to the people coming to save them from oppression and I think you can see why I don't know whether to laugh or cry. 

Privately, I call this development "Neu Republique 2.0".   We started out with "Neu Republique 1.0" with the French Rothschild interests paying the ticket for General Dunford et alia and sponsoring the "New Republic" as Successor to Contract replacing the bankrupt UNITED STATES, INC.   We said, thanks, but no thanks; we accept a month by month quid pro quo to pay for services rendered, nothing more. So now they have turned around and upped the ante, brought more of the old bloodline families and industrial upstarts together to front "Neu Republique 2.0" --- with all the rotten European interests represented and using the SwissIndo Historic Trust to fund their rampages.

We say, "Thanks, but no thanks." to this development, too.  We don't want to cheat anyone.  We agree to pay for services rendered month to month, but no assumption of contract and only conditional acceptance of the New Republic 2.0.    

And where is Donald Trump?  He thumbed his nose at Rothschild's offer of the first New Republic sales pitch, but then, turned right around and fell for New Republic 2.0.   This is not unlike a man divorcing his wife, and then getting back into bed with her and her three ugly step-sisters, too.  Why would he do such a thing?  Maybe they sweetened the pot.  Maybe he doesn't know much world history.  Maybe his advisors suck wind.  What The Donald needs to do, if he wants to be free and if he wants America to be Great Again, is to talk to the other Historic Trusts and order the Department of Defense to open their accounts so that there is détente and a counter-balance and more funding sources to choose from.

I have heard the "five million dollars to everyone and a lifetime stipend" being promoted by UN-SWISSINDO, but don't believe for a moment that this offer is coming without awful strings attached.  I haven't seen any contracts-- also known as "applications" and "enrollment forms", etc.,--- so far, so I don't know the particulars of the deception, but I can guarantee you that some kind of gross deception and false counterclaim will be involved, of the sort that whoever signs on the dotted line loses everything including their soul.  Just like the Mothers of newborns have been coerced and their children have been "enrolled" as wards of the state without anyone providing full disclosure, you can bet that UN-SWISSINDO's offer and your receipt of it, will result in you and your property being owned by unsavory interests.

All the while, these shameless frauds will be singing "Yankee Doodle Dandy" and accusing everyone and everything else of doing what they are doing themselves, either because they really do suspect everyone else of thinking and doing the same things they do, or because they hope to keep scrutiny focused on anything and anyone other than on who they actually are and what they are actually doing.  They will continue to encourage, exploit, and promote the confusion of the "UN" corporation with the United Nations organization.  They will continue to misrepresent who and what they are.  They will continue to try to two-block efforts of the other Historic Trusts to bring their assets to bear on the world's problems.  They will continue to try to cast themselves as angels of light.

As Will Rogers said, "It's hard to cheat an honest man."  --- but even honest men need to keep grounded and focused and be suspicious that something shady is going on when somebody offers to hand out five million dollars and a lifetime living stipend for free--- especially when the persons making the offer have a bad history and have made deliberate efforts to obscure who and what they are.   

As for your last question --- how can the government still be operating if it is being liquidated -- the answer is simple.  They just booted up new corporations, gave them new deceptively similar names, and skated right on with an empty balance sheet and "YOUR NAME" and estate left holding the bag for it all.

Someone should ask Mr. Trump what he thinks he is doing and why he is allowing all this to go on, when he has all the other Historic Trusts supporting his efforts?  Why get into bed with Rothschild, Rockefeller and the whole Vichy Company again? 

This is even more senseless when you realize that we already have the assets to pay for our own expenses and the expenses of the federal government, too. It's high time for Mr. Trump to put DOD to good use and open up our accounts.  What excuse can there be, for not letting the American people have access to their own Historic Trust accounts?  Hmm?  Are all 390 million of us supposed to be "terrorists"?   Are Donald Trump's actual employers-- the people who ultimately pay his salary -- his "enemies"?  And by what logic is our money being "blocked" by the U.S. Treasury/IMF and the American people are instead being kept purposefully poor and desperate and fed offers from "UN-SWISSINDO"? 

No doubt it has a lot to do with the fact that the IMF has been functioning as the U.S. Treasury for many years now and both the "IMF" and the "UN" were spun off by the same bad actors.  Their object is to feed upon us under the guise of serving us. Donald Trump is following a long string of "US Presidents" by sitting on his hands and doing nothing about it.

Someone should ask Mr. Putin--- who has been around the barn longer and accordingly knows more than Mr. Trump --- why he hasn't tired of this game and put an end to these banker "wars" when his own country has been hurt by them, and everyone can see that just a handful of evil old men have caused and are continuing to cause the unnecessary suffering of millions?   The whole world is like it is constipated and can't manage to dump the load.

Same thing for the Chinese government.  You want to deal in gold and silver?  Why aren't you expediting that process for us via an honest means, instead of standing by and letting these same old parasites have their way?  Certainly, the Chinese know that the Americans have always traded in silver?  Surely, they know that our national trust does not belong to the Territorial or Municipal United States?  We have opened an International Trade Bank allowing free trade between the United States of America and the rest of the world.  Why aren't the Chinese beating a path to our door, complaining about the US Trade Deficit, swapping U.S. Treasury Bonds for asset-backed bonds---- and demanding that we have full access to our Historic Trusts?

Again, it's still just the same old group of the same old nasty men playing the same old nasty games.  Nothing new. 

They have been caught red-handed in bankruptcy and probate fraud, trying to steal your assets, so now they are going to keep you poor---keep you from accessing your own Historic Trusts, your lawful inheritance--- and offer you fairytales and "money of account" instead, and then claim that they gave you "equitable consideration" for everything you are and all that you naturally own, when in fact five million and a lifetime stipend is nothing compared to what they are trying to take from you.  

So, now, I will a few question back to you---- how long before people wake up?   How much longer before the American people stand up and get moving instead of waiting for someone or something else to come save them?  How long before they speak with one voice and say "Enough!"  to all this international piracy and coercion on our shores?  How long before we all put enough pressure on the members of Congress to crack them open like so many Brazil Nuts and force them to do what is right by the American people they are supposed to be serving in Good Faith?  How long before our own trust accounts get opened up?  How long before we come by the millions to throw the so-called "UN" and everything and everyone associated with it back into the sea where it belongs?  

How long before somebody, somewhere, wises up enough to recognize the alligators even when they wear cute costumes and whisper sweet nothings? 

The whole purpose in draining the swamp is getting rid of the snakes and crocodiles.  The "UN" in any guise is a snake operation and the DOD is not doing its job to protect our ESTATES and the Treasury is balking from what it needs to do--- which is to stop babbling about "terrorists" like a confused old ninny and unblock our Historic Trust accounts so that we can pay our own bills -- at home and worldwide -- with no help from the "UN" nor "SWISSINDO" nor the "IMF" nor the Neu Republique in any form whatsoever. 

The Marshal Plan is done and over.  No more excuses for picking our pockets or keeping the American people in a state of perpetual "war" and charging us "Victory Taxes" 72 years after the war ended and continuing to hold title to our land as any "Victory" program, either.  Time for the Europeans to get to off our soil, off our backs, thank us for rebuilding their entire universe, and get smart enough to drain their own swamp.

And that is what I have to say about the "UN" and "UN-SWISSINDO" and the current situation.  The only message that Pope Francis and Donald Trump and the "DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE" need to hear and hear it loud and clear is--- get off the pot and open up our Historic Trust Accounts.  I have nine of them and together they make "SWISSINDO" look like a small hill of beans.  It's past time to get beyond this, stop the fraud, and move on. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 600 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

 

10 Tips for Surviving a Terrorist Vehicle Attack

Posted on June 5, 2017 by Greg Ellifritz in Articles

 

• Written by: Greg Ellifritz

 
In the event you missed it, there was an ISIS terrorist vehicle ramming attack in London last Saturday night.
 
This attack followed another ISIS vehicle attack on a second bridge in London, as well as previous Islamic vehicle terror attacks in France, Canada, Israel, and Germany.  The United States has not been immune from such attacks either.  In fact, one of the first Islamic terrorist vehicle attacks occurred in North Carolina in 2006.  Another occurred last year on the campus of the Ohio State University.
 
Why all the vehicle attacks?  The ISIS propaganda publication Rumiyah has specifically called for Muslim terrorists to use vehicles and knives as weapons against the Western world.

 

“The latest issue of Rumiyah, a new magazine from the terror group aimed at English-language speakers, included an article titled “Just Terror Tactics” that outlined ideal vehicles to use in terror attacks as well as ideal targets.

“Though being an essential part of modern life, very few actually comprehend the deadly and destructive capability of the motor vehicle and its capacity of reaping large numbers of casualties if used in a premeditated manner,” the article said.

The article also cited the attack in Nice, France, in July, in which a supposed ISIS supporter killed 86 people by plowing into a crowd with a truck on Bastille Day.

“Vehicles are like knives, as they are extremely easy to acquire,” the article said.”

 

ISIS magazine advocating vehicle attacks.

 
Clearly, terrorist vehicle attacks are on the rise.  What can we do to prevent being killed in such an attack?  Here are a few useful tips to keep you alive.
 
1) Face traffic when walking along the street.  These attacks really aren’t preventable.  Your best bet is to see the attack coming as quickly as possible and take evasive action.  If you are walking along a sidewalk with your back facing traffic, you can be run down very quickly from behind without any warning.  It’s better to face oncoming traffic.  That way, if a car hops the curb and starts barreling along the sidewalk towards you, there may be enough time to dodge it or get inside a building before you get hit.

 
2) If you have a choice, walk along streets that have vehicle blockades or cars parked at the curb.  Some urban areas have vehicle blockades to prevent cars from driving onto the sidewalks.  Where possible, walk on sidewalks that utilize those protective features.  If they aren’t available, use the next best thing…parked cars.  A street lined with parked vehicles will make it difficult for a terrorist to get up on the sidewalk with his car.  Take a look at the road below.  One side of the street would be much safer to walk on than the other.
 

Parked cars on the right hand side of the road form a natural barricade against terrorist vehicles

 
3) Watch for danger signs.  Be alert for speeding vehicles, sounds of collisions, revving engines, or sudden unusual vehicle movements.  If you see or hear something that is outside of the norm for your environment, don’t just blow it off.  Look around and actively figure out if you are in danger.  During attacks like these, a second or two of forewarning can be the difference between life and death.
 
4) Don’t rush to help the injured.  In each of the historical worldwide vehicle attacks, injured people were stacked on the sidewalk like cord wood.  Immediately after the attack, you may feel compelled to rush in and help those who have been hurt.  Take a moment and assess the scene before wading into the chaos.  Is the crashed vehicle a danger?  Are there people in the area shooting or cutting people with knives?  Is it possible that there is more than one attacker?  I’d want to know the answer to all of those questions before I become completely distracted from my environment while providing aid to the victims.

 
Look at this news article.  Victims in Saturday’s vehicle attack initially thought the suspects were running up to help the injured.  In reality, they were closing the distance and “finishing off” the people they had already hit with the car.  The attackers were stabbing, kicking, and striking the defenseless victims, not giving first aid.  The folks you think are coming to help may be the perpetrators instead.  Don’t fly into their spider web.
 
Remember, you won’t be able to help anyone if you become a casualty as well.
 
5) Move indoors immediately, but don’t stay there.  A sturdy structure offers a decent refuge from a vehicle driven by a terrorist intent on killing people.  Get inside quickly.  Stay away from large glass windows/doors and exterior walls.  Once you get inside, you are relatively safe against a vehicular weapon. The problem is created, however, when waiting with a large group of people indoors exposes you to risks from terrorist attacks that are conducted in the more traditional manner of shooting, bombing, and stabbing.  You don’t want to be huddled up into a tight group without an escape route.
 
In each of previous Islamic terrorist vehicle attacks the suspect(s) stayed outside in the area near the crash site looking for more victims to shoot or stab.  Saturday’s attack was different.  The three attackers fled the crash scene and began stabbing and slashing victims who had sought shelter inside bars, restaurants, and retail stores nearby.  Being inside a building might offer protection against a vehicle, but it won’t help you when the killers enter your hiding spot and begin cutting or shooting.
 
The safest course of action you can take in a terrorist vehicle attack is to get inside, off the street and sidewalks.  This safe haven you chose may soon become the next battleground.  Don’t hang out there.  Seek shelter immediately to buy yourself some time.  As soon as it is possible, flee the area from the building’s rear exit.

Victims hiding inside a bar after Saturday’s attack in London. The attackers broke through the exterior bar windows and stabbed more patrons inside.

 
6) Stay away from the attack vehicle and be alert for secondary attacks.  Here’s my prediction for the next evolution of this type of attack. Terrorists will place a bomb in the car they used to run people over. Explosives set to go off 10 minutes after the vehicle attack. It’s the perfect secondary device. The bomb will kill all the first responders and anyone giving aid to the victims.

 
After the attack, distance yourself from the suspect’s crashed car.  It’s too easy to hide additional attackers or a large bomb inside.
 
7) Don’t draw your firearm while you are attempting to figure out what’s happening.  Those of you who regularly carry firearms may decide that the best course of action is to shoot the attack vehicle driver or his terrorist accomplices.  That’s great.  I commend you for any assistance you are willing to provide.
 
Just recognize that it’s going to take you a few seconds to figure out what’s happening.  Keep your gun in your holster while you are evaluating the situation and making your hasty battle plan.
 
The cops will be coming quickly.  There may be other CCW carriers on the scene.  You standing around a bunch of dead bodies with a gun in your hand is a look you probably want to avoid.  Keep your weapon hidden until you need to use it.
 
8) Don’t loiter on unprotected sidewalks.
 

Use parked vehicles for cover whenever you have to stop while walking.

If you are walking on a busy street and need to stop in order to tie your shoes, write a text, or speak with a friend, stop at a spot on the sidewalk that offers you some protection from a car hopping the curb.  Look at the picture above.  The gaps between the parked cars are the likely routes the terrorists will use to get onto the sidewalk.  Don’t stand there.  You are much safer if you keep a parked car between you and the traffic lane like this group did.

 
Don’t loiter in any spaces that the terrorists can use as drive lanes.
 
9) Be able to deal with charging attackers.  Few “gun people” train empty hand defenses against a person who is attacking with a bladed weapon.  Many delusionally think “I’ll just shoot him” is an adequate response.  While I have no problem with anyone shooting an armed terrorist, it may not be quite as easy as you think it is to pull off.  Shooting bullseye targets is one thing.  Shooting as you are being slashed or stabbed is a different skill set entirely.
 
It’s even more difficult to deal with an attacker who is running full speed at you with an upraised knife.  You have to move!  If you stand still and draw your gun, you’ll likely get stabbed.  The sprinting attacker can move much faster than you if you try to back up in order to keep your distance.  A person moving forward is faster than a person backing up.  If you try to back off to create the distance you need to draw your gun, you will also likely be cut.
 
There are techniques I teach to deal with charging attackers at close range.  What is generally most effective is for the victim to move FORWARD, towards the attacker at a 45-degree angle, preferably towards the side opposite the hand your attacker is using to hold the knife.  That hard, angled movement forces the attacker to slow down and change course.  That usually buys you enough time to get your gun in play.
 
Try this technique for yourself.  Use a replica pistol and a partner with a training knife.  Have the partner charge at you from distances between five and twenty feet away.  As your training partner attacks, try different movement patterns to facilitate your draw.  Try not to get cut as you are drawing your gun.  You’ll find that this forward angling technique works better than any other option you may try.
 
10) Know how to treat knife wounds, vehicle impacts, and blast injuries.  Having the knowledge to treat battlefield injuries is absolutely critical in today’s world.  Your Red Cross First Aid/CPR course is not adequate training to prepare you for the mass casualty battlefield trauma environment.  Seek out a quality “tactical first aid” class.  If you can’t get to training, at least read my article Field Medicine for Terrorist Attacks.

 
Carrying medical gear like a tourniquet and hemostatic gauze while in large crowds is a smart idea.  Get some medical training and carry a tourniquet with you any time when you are in a situation that may be ripe for a terrorist attack.
 
I hope none of you will ever have to use this information, but my rational brain says it’s only a matter of time when attacks like this become a daily occurrence.

This being said about Chick Filet

Food Review Website Suggests Patrons Avoid Chick-fil-A Due to 'Unpalatable Baggage' - this being said about the most popular fast food chain in the nation!            Chick Filet HAS to be doing SOMETHING RIGHT!!

Only one guess as to which group of societal misfits is putting out this garbage?!  

It's unlikely there are polls that show how many people make their fast-food dining decisions based on politics, but the restaurant review website Eater recommends  customers avoid the popular Chick-Fil-A chain because of its "unpalatable baggage" of Christian values, Twitchy reported Sunday.

The review explained Atlanta-based Chick-fil-A was aggressively expanding into new markets and had donated heavily to groups opposing same-sex marriage. 

It added the company's chief executive, Dan Cathy, had said, "We're inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say we know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage."

In its headline of the review, the website said, "The fast-food giant serves up some solid food but with a side of unpalatable baggage," and offered other options for establishments that had better quality products and also supported LGBT issues.

"It's the only top 10 quick-service restaurant that doesn't mention sexual orientation in its online equal opportunity statement, and that it holds a zero rating on LGBT benefits and worker protections from a prominent advocacy group. 

McDonald's scored 100. (When I asked Chick-fil-A about this, a rep responded with a general statement reaffirming its commitment to equal opportunity and said that it's up to local franchisees to determine benefits)" the review stated.

The reviewer also lamented Chick-fil-A on Twitter, adding, "Sometimes, on a good day, [the chicken sandwich] smells like chicken."

The review went on to explain its argument for why it was a politically-incorrect move to support the fast food establishment.

"Millions of dollars of the chain's past profits funded groups that opposed same-sex marriage during an era when millions of Americans were fighting for their civil rights; smaller donations went to a group that practiced conversion therapy, a practice that stems from the discredited belief that homosexuality is a mental illness," stated the review.

Aside from politics, Eater also criticized their product, describing Chick-Fil-A's "pretty average chicken sandwich," though admitting they had "a pretty good fast-food breakfast," and a "pretty great frozen coffee."

Eater's Facebook page describes itself as "the source for people who care about dining and drinking in the nation's most important food cities." 

While some readers agreed with the assessment, there was quite a bit of backlash from those who suggested the website stick to reviewing food.

The reviewer admitted the fast food chain "doesn't have much to worry about financially; it's currently America's favorite fast-food restaurant, according to one consumer satisfaction index," adding that "sales actually soared the year Cathy made his controversial remarks."

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/LGBT-food-review-Eater-Chick-fil-A/2017/06/11/id/795425/?ns_mail_uid=104370783&ns_mail_job=1736052_06122017&s=al&dkt_nbr=sqiltwtu

 

Chick Filet MUST BE DOING SOMETHING RIGHT!  The food is very good. The very items poorly reviewed in this article are actually the most popular at the restaurant.  The staff are very well trained, polite and go out of their way to please.  And the company supports Christian values, including supporting the military and others working to help people and to defend the nation. 

 

Please! Consider showing your appreciation by supporting Chick Filet for their public service to America and their observance of Christian values.  Our boycott against Target made its point, and the leadership has begun to turn around on some of its decisions.  Let's show these criticizers that practicing Christian values DOES make a positive difference to the public and that we - as customers - appreciate and will support it when businesses make a stand for them.  Thank you!

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/01/chick-fil-appreciation-day-brings-out-supporters-more-protestors.html 

http://www.businessinsider.com/why-chick-fil-a-is-so-successful-2016-5

 

 

It’s His LAST Mistake! - Welcome to Texas!

MUSLIM  'IMMIGRANT'  PICKS  FIGHT  WITH  TEXAS  MAN  - IT'S  HIS  LAST  MISTAKE! 

By RRJ

In many other parts of the country inundated with liberal political correctness, 'entitled' Muslim 'immigrants' are finding it rather easy to impose their will and religion on America.

But time and again, they are learning the hard way that you don’t mess with Texas.

When a large road-raging Muslim man got out of his car to assault a Texas man near Houston, it was the last mistake he’d ever make.

The two men reportedly exchanged words before the Muslim, Ziad Abu Naim, got out of his Porsche and tried to punch Robert Craig Klimek through the window of his BMW.  (Wonder how Naim came up with the money to purchase that Porsche??)

Realizing the danger he was in, Klimek pulled out a gun and shot Naim in the face.

Unsurprisingly, the terrorist-linked Council on American–Islamic Relations (CAIR) is calling it a “hate crime” after claiming Klimek told Naim “go back to Islam” before shooting him. ('linked' is not strong enough -  financial  SUPPORTERS OF TERRORISM more adequately describes CAIR - a bunch of self-righteous idiots attempting to impose - FORCE - their way of life on Americans.)

The only problem with that is - even if Klimek said those words -  that in itself isn’t a crime.  But punching a man through his car window is. And, if that’s the way it went down, then Klimek’s plea of self defense is valid. 
https://conservativepost.com/muslim-immigrant-picks-fight-with-texas-man-its-his-last-mistake/

********************************

CAIR -  INSTRUCT YOUR  'PARENTS' TO TEACH THEIR KIDS AMERICAN WAYS AND MANNERS AND TO RESPECT AND ABIDE BY THEM.  WHILE YOU ARE HERE YOU ARE STRONGLY ADVISED TO BE CIVIL AT ALL TIMES IN ALL SITUATIONS OR BE PREPARED FOR REPRISAL FROM AMERICANS.  IN TEXAS WE DON'T PUT UP WITH YOUR BULLSH*T AND YOU HAVE A PERFECT EXAMPLE HERE OF WHAT WE ARE REFERRING TO.  YOU AND YOUR KIND WILL NOT TAKE OVER TEXAS!

More Evil, Turmoil and Troble in the Making.

Chuck Schumer Dines With Alex Soros, Son Of George Soros

 

MORE EVIL, TURMOIL AND TROUBLE IN THE MAKING?

WHY HAVEN'T SCHUMER AND SOROS BEEN ARRESTED FOR TRIAL?

News Commentary

By Wayne | Featured Contributor | June 12, 2017 10:17AM

 

Sen. Chuck Schumer has been trying to ruin President Trump’s presidency since Inauguration Day. The New York senator has been lying about Trump’s record and agenda while standing in the way of progress for the American people.

This weekend Sen. Chucky sat down with Alex Soros, son of billionaire George Soros, for what looks like tea and crumpets. To see both of them sitting together should be a red flag to conservatives, warning them that Schumer may be getting his marching orders from Soros Sr.

This damning picture was posted to Instagram. It almost reminds me of a U.S. Congressman sitting with Lucky Luciano or Al Capone.


Is it just me or does this Schumer guy look extremely evil in this photo? I am surprised these two weren’t invited to Mitt Romney’s weekend retreat. 

Source: Daily Caller

Don’t let the white wine, craft cocktails, and obliterated stare fool you: Schumer has previously called for bans of powdered alcohol and college Freshman blackout sensation ‘Four Loko.’
Meanwhile, according to campaign finance records, Alex gave more than $4.5 million to Democratic campaign committees and political action committees in 2016, of which the Senate Majority PAC, the political action committee of former Senator Harry Reid, was the largest benefactor with checks totaling $3.5 million.
Of the $4.5 million, $127,800 went to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and another $133,400 to the Democratic National Committee Services Corp. Maximum campaign contributions of $5,400 were doled out by Alex to various Democratic politicians, including failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, former Senator Russ Feingold, Rep. Keith Ellison, and apparent alcohol lightweight Chuck Schumer.

Well, well, now we see where Schumer’s loyalty lies. I mean, it’s apparent his agenda is not what’s in the best interest of our country or the people he supposedly represents!

Here is the Instagram post from Alex Soros:

Look at how Alex Soros wrote this Instagram post. He says Schumer helped “preserve” the assault. I think he means “prevent.” Otherwise, Soros thinks Schumer is keeping the assault on our values alive, which is probably true, but I doubt he’d say it openly!

Also, Soros mentions “our nations values and democracy.” I think it makes more sense written as “our nation, values, and democracy.” It looks like someone had too much wine at dinner!

But it’s funny how Soros says Schumer is continuing the assault on our nation, our values, and our democracy. That is what globalists do: They destroy nations, values, and democracy.

That tells you all you need to know about why Democrats should never be elected. Yes, they’re really going to “preserve the assault on our nations values and democracy,” which means they’re going to continue to “assault” our Constitution and rule of law.

Thank you, Chuck and Alex, for your truthful admission about your real intentions for the American voter. Now it’s up to all Americans to heed this and fight back with fury!

What do you think these two were talking about and should Republicans be worried? Share you voices below in the comment section and add this article to your Facebook/Twitter timeline. 

http://thepoliticalinsider.com/schumer-alex-soros/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=TPI-Newsletter-06-12-17-Morning&utm_campaign=tpi_morning_061217_newsletter&utm_content=3f2f95a5bf27ea23a6473c7b9fa19141&source=CI

Feinstein calling for investigation of Loretta Lynch

Top Democrat Diane Feinstein Calls For Investigation Into Loretta Lynch

THE KETTLE CALLING THE POT BLACK  --

 

BOTH SHOULD BE ARRESTED, INCARCERATED, AND THE KEY THROWN AWAY

 

News Commentary

By Rusty | Featured Contributor | June 12, 2017 8:53AM

After hearing former FBI Director James Comey’s testimony last week, a top Senate Democrat is calling for an investigation into Loretta Lynch’s influence on the Hillary Clinton email scandal.

Dianne Feinstein, the lead Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, announced her concerns and the need for a congressional inquiry into the matter.

During his testimony, Comey confessed that Barack Obama’s attorney general had urged him to publicly refer to the scandal as a “matter” and not an “investigation,” something he claimed was ‘confusing and concerning.’

“At one point, the attorney general had directed me not to call it an investigation but instead to call it a matter, which confused me and concerned me,” Comey said.
Now, Feinstein wants to know if Lynch’s pressuring of the FBI Director, along with her famed meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac of a Phoenix airport, amounts to obstruction of justice.

Via the New York Post:

The top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee called Sunday for a congressional investigation into former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s handling of the Hillary Clinton email probe.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said she’s concerned by former FBI Director James Comey’s testimony Thursday that Lynch asked him to downplay his “investigation” into the Democratic presidential nominee as merely a “matter.”
Comey said the political request called into the question the credibility of Lynch’s Department of Justice and made him “queasy.”
“I would have a queasy feeling too,” Feinstein admitted Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “I think we need to know more about that. And there’s only one way to know about it and that’s to have the Judiciary Committee take a look at that.”

Michael Mukasey, Attorney General serving under President George W. Bush, blasted Lynch for allowing the DOJ to become “an arm of the Clinton campaign.”
“What makes it egregious,” Mukasey explained, “is the fact — and I think it’s obvious that it is a fact — that the attorney general of the United States was adjusting the way the department talked about its business so as to coincide with the way the Clinton campaign talked about that business.”

“In other words, it made the Department of Justice essentially an arm of the Clinton campaign,” he added. 

“That is a betrayal of the department and of its independence to illustrate that clearly that the attorney general was essentially in the tank for Secretary Clinton.”

Feinstein added that a new probe would be the only way to answer whether or not Lynch provided improper political cover for Clinton.

She also urged her own party to put partisan politics aside and investigate the matter.

“Right now, this is [about] the total integrity of the president of the United States,” Feinstein said. “This is a very big deal. It should be all hands on deck. And everybody should welcome a second committee getting involved, particularly on the technical legal aspects of obstruction of justice.”

Can you imagine if, after everything liberals were hoping for from Comey’s testimony, that it ends up being Loretta Lynch who is charged with obstruction of justice?
Does Congress need to investigate Lynch? Share your thoughts below!

http://thepoliticalinsider.com/diane-feinstein-loretta-lynch-investigation/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=TPI-Newsletter-06-12-17-Morning&utm_campaign=tpi_morning_061217_newsletter&utm_content=3f2f95a5bf27ea23a6473c7b9fa19141&source=CI

Sam Walton, Hillary Clinton, Walmart and the U.S. Government

Sam Walton was NOT the 'good guy' family man that 'they' want you to believe

Clinton's had a close tie with Walton

Hillary was on the Board -  WHY?

Walmart struck a 'deal' with the U.S. Government

Walmart is in the back pocket of the U.S. Gov

cooperating on a variety of issues

Walmart claimed to have financial problems, yet after firing Walmart employees,

Hired 130,000 employees, a small army, to carry out 'plans' 

Various 'terrorist' attacks across the nation were planned to get the American people to cry out for protection and security - biometrics and RFID chipping, cameras to watch you, martial law, roundups, gun confiscation, internet and phone monitoring, creation of ISIS,
building a WALL to keep you in instead of keeping the 'terrorists' OUT - the cry for SECURITY - radical Islamic ties

Part 3 video particularly of interest

Walmart Does NOT Want You To See This Viral video
People targeted!

Walmart Does NOT Want You To See This Viral video

People targeted! (part 2)

Reference:  http://www.vault.com/company-profiles/aerospace-and-defense/aai-corporation/company-overview.aspx

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AAI_Corporation

http://www.textronsystems.com/what-we-do/unmanned-systems

Walmart Does NOT Want You To See This Viral video

People targeted! (part 3)

Published on Jun 10, 2017

I created this video with the YouTube Video Editor (http://www.youtube.com/editor)

G4S -  http://www.vanityfair.com/news/business/2014/04/g4s-global-security-company

http://www.g4s.us/

http://www.g4s.com/en/Investors/News-and-Presentations/Regulatory-Announcements/2017/03/08/2016-Full-Year-Results

http://www.g4s.com/en/Who-we-are/Where-we-Operate 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/04/01/g4s-signs-multimillion-pound-deal-to-handle-walmarts-cash/

There's a plot in this country