soaringspirit
Two Maxims of Law
• A
piratis et latronibus capta dominium non mutant.
Things captured by pirates or robbers do not change their
ownership.
• A
piratis aut latronibus capti liberi permanent.
Those captured by pirates or robbers remain free.
Citizenship cannot be forced upon
anyone without their consent. Since the living souls in America are not
citizens of your foreign corporations and have no voice through the voting
franchise in the adoption of the 14th amendment of your private
corporate constitution, no consent has been given. Thus, there is no evidence
that citizenship was accepted or even wanted by all Americans in this country
to the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA corporations.
Non-citizens of your foreign corporations are not subject to your domestic laws
known as statutes, codes, procedures, etc., civil or criminal, of this country,
thus all non-citizens of the foreign corporations calling themselves “THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” and “STATE OF CALIFORNIA”, being in and of themselves
de-facto forms of assumed government services and all of its franchises,
subsidiaries, agents, including but not limited to: “STATE OF”, departments,
courts, etc., no power has been given them by the people for the people that
are born on the land and soil of this country known as AMERICA. i.e. no staff
of a corporation or subsidiaries’ has any power given to them by We the People
to create or enforce laws or any codes, statues procedures, etc., and have not been
given to them by the fully informed We the People, and We the People are not
subject to the domestic laws known as statutes, codes, etc., thereby we enjoy immunity from all
corporations fraudulently calling themselves a government and their agents, and
are afforded the same immunity as those of visiting foreign diplomats and their
families.
As American Nationals born on the
land and soil of America we are not 14th amendment citizen slaves of
the foreign for profit private corporations calling themselves “THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA” and “STATE OF CALIFORNIA”. Case in point all corporations
and franchises, courts etc. use all upper-case letters in their titles. i.e. All
assumed government office’s, courts, departments, agents, actors, principals and
departments of their franchises, use an all upper-case word, name and/or title which
are dead things, i.e. an all upper-case block work on a piece of paper, etc.,
such as a birth registration, a bond, a negotiable instrument, licenses,
fictitious names, and so on are a fraud and fraud vitiates all.
It is the locus of the offense
which determines jurisdiction, not the offense committed. People v. Godfrey
(Cir.1880), 17 Johns, 225, 223 (N.Y. 1819)
Definition: lo·cus (l½“k…s) n.,
1. A locality; a place.
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 8thed.,
pg. 2287 – “The omission of the Christian name by either plaintiff or defendant
in a legal process prevents the court from
acquiring jurisdiction, …”
Gregg’s Manual of English: “A
name spelled in all capital letters or a name initialed, is not a proper noun
denoting a specific person, but is a fictitious
name, or a name of a dead person,
or a nom de guerre.”
“Complaint must identify at least
one plaintiff by true name; otherwise no action has been commenced.”
Roe v New York (1970, SD NY) 49 FRD 279, 14 FR Serv 2d 437, 8 ALR Fed 670.
(The reasoning behind a true name
is that neither a State, nor the United States, can pick up a pencil or sneeze,
being nothing more than a “piece of
paper”. They cannot, therefore,
assume the liability of actions nor write a complaint. All activities
carried on by governmental agencies are carried out by its agents and actors.)
The Supreme Court case, Monroe
Cattle Co. v. Becker, 147 U.S. 47 (1893) says: Defendant was impleaded by the
name of A. W. Becker. Initials are no legal part of a name, the authorities
holding the full Christian name to be essential. Wilson v. Shannon, 6 Ark. 196;
Norris v. Graves, 4 Strob. 32; Seely v. Boon, 1 N. J. Law, 138; Chappell v.
Proctor, Harp. 49; Kinnersley v. Knott, 7 C. B. 980; Turner v. Fitt, 3 C. B.
701; Oakley v. Pegler, (Neb .) 46 N. W. Rep. 920; Knox v. Starks, 4 Minn. 20,
(Gil. 7 Kenyon v. Semon, (Minn.) 45 N. W. Rep. 10; Beggs v. Wellman, 82 Ala.
391, 2 South. Rep. 877; Nash v. Collier, 5 Dowl. & L. 341; Fewlass v.
Abbott, 28 Mich. 270.
The United States Government
Printing Office Style Manual clearly defines the rules of grammar for recording
of a proper noun in Chapter 3.2, Capitalization. “Proper nouns are capitalized [examples
given] Rome, Brussels, John Macadam, Macadam family, Italy, and
Anglo-Saxon.” It further defines, in
Chapter 11.7, that “Names of vessels
are quoted in matter printed in other than lower case roman…[examples given
are] LUSITANIA [or] Lusitania.”
Black’s Law Dictionary “Fictitious Name“: “A counterfeit,
alias, feigned, or pretended name taken by a person, differing in some
essential particular from his true name (consisting of Christian name and
patronymic), with the implication that it is meant to deceive or mislead.”
Oxford Dictionary:
“nom“: Used in expressions
denoting a pseudonym, a false or assumed name.
“Nom de guerre“: War name. A name
assumed by or assigned to a person engaged in some action or enterprise.
“Guerre“: War, and as a verb, to
wage war.
The U.S. Government Style Manual,
Chapter 3 requires only the names of corporate
and other fictional entities, or
those serving in corporate capacities to be in all capitalized letters. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-STYLEMANUAL-2008/content-detail.html
Fictitious names exist for a
purpose. Fictions are invented to give court’s
jurisdiction. Snider v. Newell 44 SE 354.
This nation was not set up as a
democracy and was never intended to become one. It was established as a
constitutional republic, a constitution is created to limit a governing body,
not to enslave the people of a country and the intent was clear that it would remain
a limited republic form of governance. All of the Republican form of governments
and the offices thereof are still enforceable, but are not being utilized due
to the deliberate intent to deceive by “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” and “THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA”, by not disclosing the truth of what the federal and state
corporations have done to this country and her people. “Fraud vitiates ALL”
When someone has something for
which they’ve worked and which they’ve earned, they have an inherent Right to
keep it and dispose of it as they may choose. When someone else comes along and
just takes it by any means what so ever, that is called theft! When someone
else comes along and obtains it by threats, fraud, intimidation, etc., that’s
called extortion. And when someone else claiming to be an agent of a
government, well the labels don’t change. Here we will add a few more labels
such as inland piracy, treason, terrorism, fraud, RICO, securities fraud, etc.
Government is a fiction, it is an
artificial mechanism or device created and employed by living souls to
facilitate social, commercial intercourse. Government, being a fictional
entity, has nothing of its own. That reality must be supplied by real people.
When government gives something to someone, it must first take that something
from someone else.
color of law https://law.academic.ru/629/color_of_law
The conduct of a police officer,
judge, or another person clothed with governmental authority that, although it
superficially appears to be within the individual's lawful power, is actually
in contravention of the law. For example, a police officer who makes a false
arrest while on duty, or while off duty but when they are wearing a uniform or
badge, is acting under color of law. In some circumstances, the phrase also
applies to the conduct of private individuals that is specifically authorized
or approved by a statute. Depriving a person of his or her federal civil rights
under color of law is, in and of itself, a federal crime and a ground for a
cause of action. Also called under color of law.
If the conduct violates a federal
civil right or criminal law, it is also called state action.
See also color of title.
Color of Law and Legal
Definition https://definitions.uslegal.com/c/color-of-law/
Color of law refers to an act
done under the appearance of legal authorization, when in fact, no such right
existed. It applies when a person is acting under real or apparent government
authority. The term is used in the federal Civil Rights Act, which gives
citizens the right to sue government officials and their agents who use their
authority to violate rights guaranteed by federal law.
The following is from the Civil Rights Act:
"Every person who, under
color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or
Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United
States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of
any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws,
shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or
other proper proceeding for redress."
Acting under color of [state] law
is misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only
because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of state law Thompson v.
Zirkle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77654 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 17, 2007)
McCain
minority staff director Henry Kerner to IRS official Lois Lerner and other IRS
officials: “the solution is to audit so many that it becomes financially
ruinous”
RIGHTS THAT
CANNOT BE TAKEN AWAY.
We are NOT U.S. CITIZENS
STATUTES ARE
NOT LAW – TO BE CONVICTED UNDER A STATUTE YOU MUST HAVE MY CONSENT.
We do NOT GIVE OUR CONSENT EVER. We are NOT U.S. CITIZENS, i.e. We are
living Souls and not a dead entity written in all upper-case letters on a piece
of paper or bond paper being claimed as a vessel owned by another living or
dead entity.
A “STATUTE” is NOT a law! Flournoy v. First National Bank of
Shreveport, 197 LA 1057. 3 So.2d 244, 248.
A “CODE” is NOT a law! In Re Self v. Rhay, Wn 2d 261, in point
of fact in law.
A concurrent or “joint resolution
of legislature is NOT “Law”. Koenig v.
Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N.E. 705, 707;
Ward v. State, 176 OKL. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash. 2d 43, 110, P.2d 162, 165).
STATUTE. Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition. The
written will of the legislature, solemnly expressed according to the forms
prescribed in the constitution; an act of the legislature.
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – The
common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the codes, rules,
regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law”. Self v.
Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261.
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – ALL codes, rules, and regulations are for
government authorities ONLY, not human/Creators in accordance with God’s Laws.
All codes, rules and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due
process…” Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d, 1344,
1348 (1985).
Supreme Court 1796- This decision has never been overturned:
United States Supreme Court Decision from 1796- [Cruden v. Neale, 2
N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.] "There, every man is independent of all laws,
except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed
by his fellowman without his consent."
“There are NO Judicial Courts in America and have not been since 1789.
“Judges” do NOT enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce
Statutes and Codes. FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464 Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co., 261
U.S. 428 1 Stat. 138-178”
“There have NOT been any “Judges” in America since 1789. There have
only been Administrators. FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464 Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co.,
261 U.S. 428 1 Stat. 138-178”
“The Supreme Court has warned, “Because of what appears to be Lawful
commands [Statutory Rules, Regulations and -codes–ordinances- and Restrictions]
on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be
law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance…
[deceptive practices, constructive fraud, barratry, legal plunder, conversion,
and malicious prosecution in inferior administrative State courts].” (United
States v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187, 76 S.Ct. 281, 100 L.Ed. 185 (1956);”
“The Common Law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land. The
codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law.” (Self v.
Rhay, 61 Wn 2d 261), They are the law of government for internal regulation,
not the law of man, in his separate but equal station and natural state, a
sovereign foreign with respect to government generally.
“A concurrent or ‘joint resolution’ of legislature is not “Law,”
(Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707; Ward v State, 176 Okl. 368,
56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162,
165).
All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only,
not human/Creators in accord with God’s Laws. “All codes, rules, and
regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process of Law..”(Rodriques v.
Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)); …lacking
due process of law, in that they are ‘void for ambiguity’ in their failure to
specify the statutes’ applicability to ‘natural persons,’ otherwise depriving
the same of fair notice, as their construction by definition of terms aptly
identifies the applicability of such statutes to “artificial or fictional
corporate entities or ‘persons’, creatures of statute, or those by contract
employed as agents or representatives, departmental subdivisions, offices,
officers, and property of the government, but not the ‘Natural Person’ or
American citizen Immune from such jurisdiction of legalism.”
“A “Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport,
197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),
A “Code’ or Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of
Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),”
“A “Code’ is not a Law,” (In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261), in point of
fact in Law).”
The added and revised California constitution use by THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA and its agents, are using codes to force extortion levies on all
Californians see this link:
As stated above all statutes, codes,
procedures etc., by any corporations are not the laws of the land and are not
enforceable upon the people of this nation. Only We the People have the power
to create and enforce law and We the People have not given over our rights or
power to foreign agents or entities.
There is no warrant in law for such a holding. Gould v. Gould, 245 U.S.
151, at p. 153, 38 S.Ct. 53, 62 L.Ed. 211. In 51 American Jurisprudence,
"Taxation", Sec. 316, "Strict or Liberal Construction",
supported by a great wealth of authority, it is said:
'Although it is sometimes broadly stated either that tax laws are to be
strictly construed or, on the other hand, that such enactments are to be
liberally construed, this apparent conflict of opinion can be reconciled if it
is borne in mind that the correct rule appears to be that where the intent of
meaning of tax statutes, or statutes levying taxes, is doubtful, they are,
unless a contrary legislative intention appears, to be construed most strongly
against the government and in favor of the taxpayer or citizen. Any doubts as
to their meaning are to be resolved against the taxing authority and in favor
of the taxpayer. * * *'
In the 1040 IRS instruction booklet of 1992/1993, page 3, Margaret
Richardson wrote a disclaimer stating income taxes are voluntary. We do not nor
ever have volunteered to give our wealth away.
WHERE IS YOUR MANDATORY FOREIGN AGENTS REGISTRATION ACT OF 1938?
https://www.justice.gov/nsd-fara
“THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA” is a franchise of the foreign corporation
calling its self: “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” both thereby being liable to
the international laws. You are all in violation of the International Covenants
on Civil and Political Rights:
Article 1
1. All peoples have the right of
self-determination, "By virtue of that right they freely determine their
political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural
development.
2. All peoples may, for their own
ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to
any obligations arising out of international economic co-operation, based upon
the principle of mutual benefit, and
international law. In no case may a
people be deprived of its own means of subsistence.
3. The States Parties to the
present Covenant, including those having responsibility for the administration
of Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories, shall promote the realization of
the right of self-determination, and shall respect that right, in conformity
with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.
Article 2
1. Each State Party to the
present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within
its territory and subject to its Jurisdiction the rights recognized in the
present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex,
language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin,
property, birth or other status.
2. Where not already provided for
by existing legislative or other measures, each State Party to the present
Covenant undertakes to take the necessary steps, in accordance with its
constitutional processes and with the provisions of the present Covenant, to
adopt such legislative or other measures as may be necessary to give effect to
the rights recognized in the present Covenant.
3. Each State Party to the
present Covenant undertakes:
(a) To ensure that any person
whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an
effective remedy, notwithstanding that
the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity;
Article 5
1. Nothing in the present
Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any
right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of
any of the rights and freedoms recognized herein or at their limitation to a
greater extent than is provided for in the present Covenant.
2. There shall be no restriction
upon or derogation from any of the fundamental human rights recognized or
existing in any State Party to the present Covenant pursuant to law,
conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext that the present Covenant
does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent.
Article 7
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his
free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.
Article 8
1. No one shall be held in slavery; slavery and the slave-trade in all
their forms shall be prohibited.
2. No one shall be held in servitude.
3. (a) No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour;
Article 9
1. Everyone has the right to
liberty and security of person. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or
detention. No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and
in accordance with such procedure as are established by law.
Article 17
1. No one shall be subjected to
arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or
correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation.
2. Everyone has the right to the
protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
Proclamation to the people of California. Year: 1849,
We, the people of California,
grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, in order to secure its blessings, do
establish this Constitution.
Article 1,
sec. 1. All men [living souls]
are by nature free and independent, and have certain inalienable rights, among
which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring,
possessing and protection of property: and pursuing and obtaining safety and
happiness.
Sec. 2. All political power is inherent in the people, government is
instituted for the protection, security
and benefit of the people: and they have the right to alter or reform the
same, whenever the public good may require it.
Sec. 9. Every citizen, [living
soul] may freely speak, write and publish his [their] sentiments on all
subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right; and no law shall be
passed to restrain of abridge the liberty of speech or of the press.
Sec. 15. No person shall be
imprisoned for debt, in any civil action on mesne or final process, unless in
cases of fraud: and no person shall
be imprisoned for a militia fine in time of peace.
Sec. 16. No bill of attainder, ex
post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be
passed.
What is a contract?
A contract is an agreement
between two or more persons (e.g., individuals, corporations, partnerships,
limited liability companies or government agencies) to do, or to refrain from
doing, a particular thing in exchange for something of equal value. No enforceable contract would come into existence if
obtained by force, fraud or
deception/non-disclosure. The consent or assent of a party to an agreement
must be genuine, clearly defined and
voluntary. This assent will not be genuine or voluntary in certain cases of
duress, mistake, deception or undue pressure. In these cases, any contract real
or assumed are null and void, i.e. fraud vitiates all.
Sec 17. Foreigners who are, or
who may hereafter become bona fide residents of this State, shall enjoy the
same rights in respect to the possession, enjoyment and inheritance of
property, as native-born citizens. [i.e. wages, income and all other forms of property, are the
real, personal and private property of living souls and are not subjected to
your claims of ownership under your criminal frauds against WE THE PEOPLE.
Re-read the two maxims of law]
Sec 18. Neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude, unless for the
punishment of crimes, shall ever be
tolerated in this State.
Sec 19. The right of the people
to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable
seizures and searches, shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue but on
probable cause, supported by oath or
affirmation, particularly describing the place to be searched, and the
persons and things to be seized.
THE BILL OF RIGHTS
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress
of grievances.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the
United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are
reserved to the States respectively, or
to the people.
These facts remove all
controversy from the matter at hand, thus meaning there is no longer any
recourse to a court of law since this NOTICE CEASE AND DESIST, is a PRIMA FACIE
CASE. This Notice to Cease and Desist addresses the crimes and violation of
OATHS of all subordinate public servants acting under your supervision and
includes specifically, all identified in This Notice to Cease and Desist by
their ignoring their moral and fiduciary duty. The following stare decisis
apply; Hafer v. Melo, 502 US 21 (1991): “US Supreme Court held that state
officials acting by ”color of law” may be held
personally liable for the injuries or torts they cause and that official or
sovereign immunity may not be asserted.”; Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 US 232 (1974),
94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974), “When a state officer acts under a state law in a
manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he comes into conflict with the
superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or
representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of
his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity
from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States.”; Warnock v
Pecos County, Texas, 116 F. 3d 776 – No.96-50869 Summary Calendar. July 3,
1997.
In the Western world and many
Eastern countries, each of us was born into the world with a bounty on our
heads. This is due to the fact that our federal government considers us as
enemies of the state. According to Judge Dale, author of The Great American
Adventure: The Secrets of America, if you live in the United States, the act
that makes you an enemy of the U.S. federal government is “The Trading with the
Enemy Act.” This act was amended by Franklin D. Roosevelt in March 1933.
Even though you are considered an
enemy of the corporate government, it actually has no jurisdiction over you as a living man or woman. However, if you
agree to be a citizen of your corporate government, then it has jurisdiction
over you. For example, to be a United States citizen means that you are an
“employee” of the United States which is a corporation. If you want evidence of
this, look at subsection 14 & 15 in Title 28 U.S. Code § 3002 and you
should see this phrase “”(14) “State”
means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth
of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or
possession of the United States.
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the
United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States””
In regards to the living man or woman
including identities, titles, real, personal and private property, flesh, body,
blood, fluids and dna, cannot be patented transferred or sold nor be collateral
for any sureties. Re-read the two maxims of law.
These criminal corporations are under new management, controlled by the
military and are being completely restructured, removing all the criminals that
have committed extreme atrocities against We The People. There are currently
over 63,000 sealed indictments, some of which have already begun tribunals. Out
of that 63,000 sealed indictments, over 10,000 nearing 11,000, are for
California alone. The second largest being held is in Texas.
As promised by the current administration, the swamp is being drained
and it is only a short mater of time, all the crimes and evil that has been
done for decades to the people of this country will be exposed and the
criminals brought to true justice.
The Conspiracy Project: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sDSv5WQ1m0&app=desktop
Vaccines are designed to kill us: https://i-uv.com/whistleblower-dr-judy-mikovits-11-minutes-that-blew-me-away/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+IUv+%28I+UV%29
Outlaw vaccines: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ir8k18GP_3Y&feature=youtu.be
Num exposes damage by nano tech and
more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boBdrbODm3s
STATE OF CALIFORNIA CAFR ACCOUNT: https://www.sco.ca.gov/Files-ARD/CAFR/cafr17web.pdf
Credit where Credit is Due
Let’s give credit where credit is
due. Hundreds of thousands of souls that live only by reality, truth, honor and
integrity, suffering great hardships to the extreme of losing their lives have
gone before us to ensure we have stored in posterity the truth of what has and
continues to occur in our world.
It has become my great honor through
my own great suffering and loss, to pass on a small portion of what they
brought forward for us to find.
It is my hope that all who find
my voice speaking out, will pick up the torch and assist in this fight to save
lives, our world and the next generations to follow our lead.
Facing the truth should not be a
hard thing and yet it is the only thing that stops so many of us from living a
life of honor and integrity. A shallow life lived is an empty life indeed.
May we all wake up and expose the
terrors and corruption that has and continues to destroy the beauty this life
should’ve been, in the hopes we can destroy the evil and bring into reality
that which this planet and all her inhabitants truly have to offer. Many blessings, may they flow eternally unbroken, Nikki G.
