April 23, 2014 by 2012thebigpicture

Neil Keenan Update: Keeping the Fox Out of the Hen House & the Rothschilds Go Into Hiding [video]

It sounds like there are many converging plans to shut down the New World Order. Now if we could just fastforward the clock a little… but we shall see what the pinnacle of the Cardinal Grand Cross alignment brings us today.  ~ BP

April 23, 2014
By The Keenan Team
Little is known what to expect from Neil Keenan. Just when you think you have him pegged, he turns it around, letting you know that you have no idea what he is actually thinking.
Once you let the fox in the hen house only bad things can happen. He brings to our attention the fact that Obama is flying to Asia only to upset the political structure and relationships between the Chinese and the Asiatic allied members of the U.S.   Obama is filling their heads with promises of support and finance (“we will never desert you”) when in fact the US has been deserting everyone that they have pledged to defend.
With the proposed NO FLY ZONE, Neil delivers the idea that in the near future Obama and his cronies will have to enter through the back door, Japan, which means flying over the Pacific Ocean rather than Europe. Their quest to poison Asia is still on the table, but it cannot be accomplished without encountering serious dangers that they never expected.  Who in this world ever expected Neil Keenan to propose a NO FLY ZONE to the Russians, Chinese, Dragon Family and many others in order to eliminate from our world the poisons, death and destruction that we are now suffering from?
In point of fact, a NO FLY ZONE makes perfect sense when we look at everything happening around us. If the fox does not get into the Asiatic and Russian hen houses, then we can safely predict that their efforts to create a New World Order will be in vain. This is precisely where Neil and his team will be working with sure and swift efficiency – the No-Fly documents are being finalized now.
This is a new time – a new world!  Let us take action to conquer these evils so that we can take back our world. And only by taking real action can we ever achieve this.
Featured in this post:

• The atrocities happening in Donetsk, Ukraine which are not being reported by any media.
• A question posed: where are the Rothschilds hiding? Putin has put the fear of the “lord” into the Rothschilds, and rightfully so seeing that even their devils cannot help them anymore.
• Neil announces that our team has now been joined by extremely powerful new allies from the West, all the more assurance that our efforts will be successful.

This update is let you know what is happening and give you a taste of what’s to come.
Source

Share this:

http://2012thebigpicture.wordpress.com/2014/04/23/neil-keenan-update-keeping-the-fox-out-of-the-hen-house-the-rothschilds-go-into-hiding-video/

WAS HARRY REID CUTING A DEAL WITH CHINA TO GRAB LAND TO COVER NON COLLATERALIZED CDO'S? SECURITY EXCHANGE COMMISSION-CDO'S, HARRY REID, CHINA

WAS HARRY REID CUTING A DEAL WITH CHINA TO GRAB LAND TO COVER NON COLLATERALIZED CDO'S? SECURITY EXCHANGE COMMISSION-CDO'S, HARRY REID, CHINA

It is believed; NONE of this would never been exposed had the duly constituted, outstanding, primary creditor not challenged J.P. MORGANS COLLATERAL BASE.
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2013/10/425250.shtml

(NON COLLATERALIZED "CDO'S)

BOGUS GOLD DERIVATIVES/INSTRUMENTS
and
PENDING U.S. BANKING & FINANCIAL CRASH
By V.K. Durham
2/16/03
http://www.theantechamber.net/V_K_Durham/BogusGoldDeriv.html

To: Chuck Grassley ; William_Anderson@grassley.senate.gov ; Jack McCreery (SEC); Arnie Gammelsgarrd (Bank Fraud Division DK)

U.S. Senator Charles E. Grassley, Former Chairman, U.S. Senate Banking Committee, Present American Judiciary Washington, District of Columbia Federal Offices and Sioux City Iowa Federal Offices
REF: NO NATION. NO NATIONS PEOPLE, NO PERSON, NO INDIVIDUAL "SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FRAUDULENT ACTS COMMITTED BY OTHERS AGAINST THEIR PROPERTIES WITHOUT THEIR "AUTHORIZATION.

"Ref: NON PERFORMING BOGUS BONUS 3392-181 GOLD DERIVATIVES/INSTRUMENTS and

PENDING U.S. BANKING & FINANCIAL CRASH also known as "BANKRUPTCY" of the United States of America.

Ref: JOHN N. PERRY vs THE UNITED STATES DEBT. 294 U.S. 330.

 Was Harry Reid cutting a deal with China with the NEVADA Gold, Silver, Platinum, Iridium, Beridium etc deposits to cover non authorized COLLATERALIZED US DEBT OBLIGATIONS amounting to 1/2 of

$206, 858,581,465,280,000,000.00 due and payable in Gold, Gold Coin, Gold Bullion and/or Coin of the Realm?

Senator Grassley:

The United States of America and ALL DEBTOR NATIONS owe to this DURHAM (INTL. LTD) HOLDING TRUST (TIAS 12087); The amount calculated, notarized and of record with the U.S. Bureau of Public Debt, U.S. Dept. of the Treasury, U.S. Security Exchange Commission the amount calculated as due and payable in gold, gold coin, gold bullion and/or coin of the realm, calculated from May 1, 1875 to May 1, 1990,
$206, 858,581,465,280,000,000.00 including all compoundings and accruals since the first calculations.

For some unknown reason, instead of Debt Payment by the United States to this DURHAM (INTL. LTD;) HOLDING TRUST (TIAS 12087) persons in the capacity of financial management and Payment of Debt's of the United States found it more expedient to UNLAWFULLY and DECEPTIVELY use, by UNAUTHORIZED CONVERSION the COLLATERAL GOLD INTEREST accrued, owned by THE DURHAM (INTL. LTD;) HOLDING TRUST (TIAS 12087) for the purpose of A BANKING & FINANCIAL WAR which, this nation is presently confronted, as her debt to these "parties" illegally and unlawfully using the BOGUS GOLD DERIVATIVES-INSTRUMENTS known as the U.S. Federal Reserve Banking System put under the U.S. DEPT. OF THE TREASURY "UNCONSTITUTIONALLY" by President William J. Clinton in 1994 to conceal the 1991 BRADY BONDS FRAUDS^(Click) and the BANKING FAILURES brought about by that particular incident which involved NICHOLAS BRADY and (Sir) ALAN GREENSPAN.

In conformance with 28 U.S.C. EVIDENCE RULES; Documents provided to your Federal Offices which is and was, Hard, Irrefutable, Undeniable Evidence of ORGANIZED CRIMINAL ACTIVITY by parties/persons currently in "Agreement with the Federal Reserve to split 50%-50% all monies taken down on BONUS 3392-181 who now sit in the Philippines awaiting "Instructions from the Fed. R./UST as to when to bring the gold home."

vox

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

The SEC's just been caught colluding with the banks it's supposed to regulate

Updated by Matthew Yglesias on April 11, 2014, 12:30 p.m. ET @mattyglesias matt@vox.com

Tweet Share

Don't miss stories. Follow Vox!

Reuters finance blogger Felix Salmon had a post earlier this week headlined "Yes, the SEC was colluding with banks on CDO prosecutions." This ought to be huge news. The Securities and Exchange Commission is one of the main agencies that's supposed to be regulating Wall Street. But they've been essentially caught red handed working together with Goldman Sachs to make it look like Goldman was paying a huge fine when really they're paying a small one. Sadly, though, the story probably won't get much attention from the general public because the CDO prosecution issue is a little obscure and it hasn't really been in the news for years.
But people ought to understand this story. It's a very big deal not so much because the case was all that important, but because it speaks directly to the question of whether or not our government institutions have the will and ability to regulate the financial sector.

What's a CDO?

CDO stands for collateralized debt obligation.
To understand what that means, start with something simple like a mortgage or an auto loan. The good news for a lender is that he earns a profit — the interest rate — on the money leant out. The bad news is that the borrower may default.
So now imagine you had ten roughly similar loans. A person who owned-one tenth of each of those loans would earn the same interest rate as someone who owned a single loan, but the odds of all ten loans defaulting simultaneously are low. A package that consisted of one-tenth of ten separate loans would be a very simple form of collateralized debt obligation.
The same principle can be applied, however, to create very complicated securities. Investment banks did a lot of this during the pre-crisis years, and belief that these securities were very safe fueled a lot of lending activity. read more!  http://www.vox.com/2014/4/11/5602188/the-secs-just-been-caught-colluding-with-the-banks-its-supposed-to

Indicted Businessman Names Harry Reid as Alleged Recipient of Massive Bribe

Posted on 17 April, 2014 by AmyElizabeth

A Utah businessman is rocking both state and national politics after claiming Utah Attorney General John Swallow helped him broker a deal with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to make a federal investigation into his company quietly disappear, the Salt Lake Tribune reports.

Jeremy Johnson was allegedly told that the price would be $600,000, and claims to have made an initial payment of $250,000 when he was slapped with a federal lawsuit.  Now he says he wants his money back.

The Salt Lake Tribune points out that Johnson has no way of knowing whether the funds actually made it to Reid, even if he did make a massive payment to Reid’s alleged intermediary.

Senator Harry Reid’s office has declined to comment.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/12/indicted-businessman-names-harry-reid-as-alleged-recipient-of-massive-bribe/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=story&utm_campaign=ShareButtons

Cobra Update

I have a new update on my blog. Please post it on your blogs and share it if you feel so guided:

http://2012portal.blogspot.com/2014/04/isis-portal-report-and-window-of.html

Victory of the Light,

Cobra

FACT CHECK #118

Posted on April 20, 2014 by whitehatauxiliaries • 171 Comments

How Will You Pay It Forward?

Greetings, and Happy Easter!
It’s time for a little diversion from the usual.

I know that the waiting game it not easy. For some, like those in prosperity programs, which were offered in the 1990′s and through 2002, it has been over a decade of mystery, with little in the way of proper information that is rooted in official fanfare.

The currency issues, such as the dinar and dong, and whatever other 18 currencies are slated to revalue, takes center stage by virtue of the number of those involved. No further explanation is required from us as to the sheer width and breadth of the emotional ranges that all of you have experienced with this particular piece of the equation. From a penny to $32, and every number in between, we have been subjected to so many opinions and theories that even Buckminster Fuller would have been staggered to understand it.

Then, there are the CMKX shareholders. Within their ranks are some of the most scorned. You hear some of the most devilish, blood-curdling blasphemy from that quarter of the ranks. If a lynch mob is ever formed by the disgruntled, a CMKX shareholder is sure to be the one to fashion the noose. But, given what was done to them, when all they did was invest funds in what they thought was a properly regulated share offering, they certainly have cause to be angry. The affair was so broad and scandalous that CMKX is on the lists for WGS settlement.  Good for them, and I hope it happens soon.

We call this blog “White Hat Auxiliary” because we are convinced beyond all doubt that the White Hats are holding the point, and we are there to back them up on the “civilian” level. They are involved, and, they are properly positioned to carry the matter to conclusion. All categories above: Prosperity Programs, Currency Revaluations, CMKX, are riding on the release of the World Global Settlements. The White Hats and some 1800 people the world over are  working hard to bring this to a finality. But, it does not end there. Fact Check #115 was key to all of you being properly set up and able to make a difference and not fall into the trap of reverting back into whatever non optimum financial condition you sought to alleviate by participating in the aforementioned programs and speculations. 

A while back, one of our members suggested that we start a thread so that all of you could describe how you intend to pay it forward once this matter is set loose. Our White Hat contact agreed that such would be a good idea. So, now you have a thread to describe such!

Now, please do not just write “I have projects”. Projects? That does not describe the matter in enough detail. Please be specific. 
An example would be: “I intend to fund a local college program to teach students how to increase the agricultural yield”. Then, describe why such is your passion, and why it is vital.

Or, as another example: ” I am going to lobby to remove all laws that restrict doctors from using so-called “alternative treatments” on patients who elect to use such methods to treat their diseases. I want medical doctors to be free to apply such methods in the USA, as they do in other nations, but under supervision of peer review, and without resistance from big pharma because of concern for loss of profit.”

And another example: “I am going to donate my newly acquired free time to volunteer as….”a teacher”….”a lawyer defending poor persons”…….”a pilot delivering food to disaster areas”……”a contractor  teaching less advantaged how to build homes, and fund their first effort.” Etc.

The choices are endless, and I could not possibly cover them all.

Let’s show the White Hats, and their many colleagues, working on our behalf, that we intend to make good use of this second chance to have the fruits of our nation returned to OUR control. Just how will we demonstrate the stewardship that will be bestowed on our shoulders? How will we nurture and protect our country and communities, and likewise set a good example?

So, let’s hear it! How will YOU pay it forward?

Our continuing thanks goes out to the White Hats and their colleagues and staff the world over.
Thank you for your continued support. Please stay tuned for further updates.
WHA
Share this

Taxpayers Subsidize Walmart and America's Richest Family to the Tune of $7.8 Billion Annually

5COMMENTS

04/22/2014

Kenneth Quinnell

A new report from Americans for Tax Fairness shows that taxpayers in the United States subsidize Walmart and the Walton family, who owns the majority of Walmart stock and is the richest family in the country, by at least $7.8 billion annually. The report, Walmart on Tax Day: How Taxpayers Subsidize America's Biggest Employer and Richest Family, was released in conjunction with tax day, when millions of Americans and small businesses do their civic duty and pay their fair share to support the economy and services critical to many Americans. At the same time, the report shows, taxpayers help pad Walmart and the Walton family's profits.

The report makes it very clear that not only do Walmart and the Waltons not need these subsidies, but that the company could more than afford to raise salaries and improve benefits for their workers, more than half of whom made less than $25,000 last year:

Walmart is the largest private employer in the United States, with 1.4 million employees. The company, which is number one on the Fortune 500 in 2013 and number two on the Global 500, had $16 billion in profits last year on revenues of $473 billion. The Walton family, who owns more than 50 percent of Walmart shares, reaps billions in annual dividends from the company. The six Walton heirs are the wealthiest family in America, with a net worth of $148.8 billion. Collectively, these six Waltons have more wealth than 49 million American families combined.

Sign up to receive AFL-CIO Now blog alerts>>

 

The tax breaks and taxpayer subsidies that Walmart gets, more than $7.8 billion every year, are enough to hire 105,000 new public school teachers, notes Americans for Tax Fairness. An estimated $6.2 billion of that money comes from food stamps, health care and other taxpayer-funded programs that Walmart employees are eligible for because their salaries are so low. Another $1 billion is derived from tax breaks and loopholes Walmart uses to avoid paying its full tax burden. The Walton family avoided paying an estimated $607 million because much of their compensation is derived from dividends, which are taxed at a lower rate than salaries. Other tax avoidance methods Walmart engages in comes from economic development subsidies from state and local governments.

Furthermore, the report estimates that the Walton family avoids paying another $3 billion in taxes by dodging estate taxes. Taxpayer funds further benefit the company from customers who don't work for the corporation but spend food stamp money there, with an estimate of $13.5 billion in sales last year.

Read the full report.

Those who feel that Walmart and the Walton family owe America can sign a petition sponsored by the Americans for Tax Fairness, Making Change at Walmart and the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW).

The SEC's just been caught colluding with the banks it's supposed to regulate

vox

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

The SEC's just been caught colluding with the banks it's supposed to regulate

Updated by Matthew Yglesias on April 11, 2014, 12:30 p.m. ET @mattyglesias matt@vox.com

Tweet Share

Don't miss stories. Follow Vox!

Reuters finance blogger Felix Salmon had a post earlier this week headlined "Yes, the SEC was colluding with banks on CDO prosecutions." This ought to be huge news. The Securities and Exchange Commission is one of the main agencies that's supposed to be regulating Wall Street. But they've been essentially caught red handed working together with Goldman Sachs to make it look like Goldman was paying a huge fine when really they're paying a small one. Sadly, though, the story probably won't get much attention from the general public because the CDO prosecution issue is a little obscure and it hasn't really been in the news for years.
But people ought to understand this story. It's a very big deal not so much because the case was all that important, but because it speaks directly to the question of whether or not our government institutions have the will and ability to regulate the financial sector.

What's a CDO?

CDO stands for collateralized debt obligation.
To understand what that means, start with something simple like a mortgage or an auto loan. The good news for a lender is that he earns a profit — the interest rate — on the money leant out. The bad news is that the borrower may default.
So now imagine you had ten roughly similar loans. A person who owned-one tenth of each of those loans would earn the same interest rate as someone who owned a single loan, but the odds of all ten loans defaulting simultaneously are low. A package that consisted of one-tenth of ten separate loans would be a very simple form of collateralized debt obligation.
The same principle can be applied, however, to create very complicated securities. Investment banks did a lot of this during the pre-crisis years, and belief that these securities were very safe fueled a lot of lending activity.

What did banks do wrong?

Two slightly different but fundamentally similar things.
One set of allegations involved banks creating and marketing CDOs that they believed to be risky, marketing them as safe, and then making side-bets that the CDO in question would go bust.
Another set of allegations involved banks marketing CDOs whose contents were actually selected by third parties — third parties who were making bets that the CDO would go bust.
In either case, the basic claim was of fraudulent marketing of the security. In general, people who sell products that fail are held in low regard. People who sell products that they know to be likely to fail are held in lower regard. People who sell products that they in fact intend to fail and who've arranged financial bets such that failure will result in higher profits are held in even lower regard.
Once the full extent of the financial crisis became clear, these sort of deals were widely criticized and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) which is supposed to prevent misconduct in financial markets began a series of investigations.
the SEC's conclusion was extremely fishy

What happened?

Investigations were launched against various banks. Each investigation focused on a particular CDO and the circumstances of its creation and marketing. All of the investigations were settled for sums of money that were quite large relative to the size of the CDO in question, though small relative to the size of the banks' CDO businesses.

What's wrong with that?

Well, nothing. It's more about what happened next. Or rather about what didn't happen next. Each bank settled a single case, and then there were no more cases. But superficially, each of the banks involved in the litigation had created several CDOs that looked similar in the relevant ways. It's of course perfectly plausible that further scrutiny revealed that not every superficially similar CDO was equally bad. But the SEC's conclusion that every bank had created one and only one prosecution-worthy CDO was extremely fishy. That would be one heck of a coincidence.

What do we know now?

What is now looking clearer and clearer is that the settlements were not as advertised. The banks paid money — in Goldman Sachs' case $550 million — not to settle one CDO suit, but to settle all the CDO suits. So rather than Goldman paying $550 million for wrongdoing around the Abacus CDO and then facing 10 more charges related to 10 other suspicious CDOs, it was paying a price of $55 million per CDO to settle all 11 cases. Except the SEC didn't want to look like it was letting the banks get away with a slap on the wrist, so it worked out an arrangement whereby both sides would publicly act as if only one case had been settled while agreeing under the table that all claims were now resolved.
The banks paid not to settle one CDO suit, but to settle all the CDO suits

How do we know?

We know this because of Freedom of Information Act requests filed by American Lawyer pursuant to their investigation of the Abacus investigation. In her article on the subject of the 2,000 pages of documents she received, Susan Beck focuses on a slightly different issue — the internal disagreements among SEC staff about whether to pursue the Abacus investigation further up the Goldman Sachs hierarchy rather than stopping with the relatively low-level Fab Toure. But as Felix Salmon observes, Beck's article (and the documents she obtained to write it) also confirm his longstanding suspicion of collusion between the SEC and the banks on the question of settlements.
Here's the nut, per Beck. Robert Khuzami is the top enforcement guy at the SEC. David Kotz is the SEC's inspector general, charged with oversight of the agency's performance:The SEC filed its case against Goldman and Tourre on April 16, 2010. Three days later Goldman reached out with a $500 million settlement offer, according to an email that Reisner sent Khuzami. Although that proposal was close to the final payment, it took another three months to announce a settlement. As Khuzami described to Kotz, Goldman wanted a global settlement that resolved not just the Abacus investigation but the SEC's probes into roughly a dozen other Goldman CDOs.
Khuzami didn't want to give Goldman that public victory. When the SEC and Goldman announced on July 16, 2010, that the investment bank would settle the Abac­us case for $550 million, the SEC said in a press release that the settlement "does not settle any other past, current or future SEC investigations against the firm."
Khuzami was determined that Goldman's payment only be linked to ABACUS. "This was not a $550 million settlement for 11 cases," Khuzami told Kotz. "We may tell Goldman that we are concluding our investigations in these other matters without recommending charges, but that doesn't mean we're settling them. And that was an important point for us, because we didn't want them out there saying, you know, they settled 12 CDO investigations for an average of $30 million each, and, you know, didn't [Goldman] get a great deal."
In other words, Khuzami agreed to a global settlement with Goldman, but then lied about what he'd agreed to. And he more or less got Goldman to go along with the lie as part of the agreement. There is still no smoking gun to prove that the exact same process played out in the settlements with the other banks, but the pattern of one-and-only-one prosecution followed by a settlement is the same everywhere. It's always been a suspicious pattern. And now in the one case we've been able to look into, we know there was collusion. It's deeply suspicious.

How important is this CDO thing? Did this cause the crisis?

The CDO prosecutions were not, on their own terms, particularly consequential. It's probably more accurate to say that the funny business being alleged was caused by the same things as caused the overall financial crisis — a climate of hubris about the ability of complicated securitization algorithms to eliminate risk — than to say that what happened here caused the crisis.

So is this story important?

It's hugely important. Much more important than the CDO cases as such ever were. The reason is that it exposes a post-crisis pattern of troubling coziness between a major financial market regulator and the major regulated entities. Among other things, to pull something like this off requires an exceptional level of trust between high-ranking SEC officials and high-ranking bank officials. The one case may not be particularly important, but enforcement of securities law in the aggregate is certainly important. The strong implication of this story is that there is — or at least was as of a couple of years ago — a culture of impunity on Wall Street, abetted by an SEC that is more interested in looking tough in press releases than in actually acting tough.

Robert Khuzami Win McNamee/Getty Images

Where is Robert Khuzami now?

Conveniently enough, he's working in Kirkland & Ellis' government and internal investigations practice group. In other words, if your company finds itself in hot water with a regulatory agency, Khuzami can help advice you on how to deal with it. He might, for example, be able to suggest that for regulators the appearance of a big settlement is sometimes more important than the reality so that the key to getting a favorable arrangement is to let the regulators post wins on the board that they can brag about in public. The viability of this kind of bargaining tactic isn't necessarily obvious to people who've never worked inside the agencies in question, so experience leading them can be very valuable in the private sector.

Card 5 of 10 Launch cards

What is the unemployment rate?

The unemployment rate is the number of number of people looking for a job divided by the total size of the labor force. This means that the unemployment rate often misses a lot of discouraged people who have stopped looking for work but would love a job if they could find one.
The flipside of the unemployment rate is the employment rate, the ratio of people with jobs to the total size of the labor force. It is rare to hear anything about the employment rate. Instead, a more commonly discussed statistic is the employment-population ratio-the ratio of people with jobs to all people, including children, retirees, homemakers and others who aren't in the labor force.

The unemployment rate rose sharply in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, and has been falling since 2010. Currently it stands at 6.7 percent which is still high by historical standards.

U.S. Gives Russia Free Military Equipment Used By Army, Marines

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2014/03/u-s-gives-russia-free-military-equipment-used-by-army-marines/

The secret operation was exposed this week by members of Congressthat discovered it in the process of reviewing the Fiscal Year 2014 budget and the proposed Fiscal Year 2015 budget request. It turns out that the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) has been providing the Russian Federation with the Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System (MILES), the federal legislators say. The U.S. military uses MILES for tactical force-on-force training because it has a system of lasers and dummy ammunition to simulate ground combat.

Obama Eligibility Charges PUT ON HOLD?

Sheriffs and Larry Klayman,

So NOW it is getting Political to Place the TRIAL of the Century ON Hold till After the November Elections just to get a MORE Approval Rating from Congress to Take actions AGAINST the People for their Conspiracy Theory?
Yet ANYONE committing FRAUD to be a Member of Congress, that Person would be PUT in JAIL IMMEDIATELY!
I would say as one of the American Public that ALL People that HOLD UP the ARREST of OBAMA on Presidential FRAUD is JUST AS GUILTY!!!
A De Jure Grand Jury is the Way to Go, NOT thru THE UNITED STATES, INC. Federal Court System!
The Eligibility and the 25 Treason Charges are separate, yet ARE Combined on one man, but they ARE STILL CRIMES!
As NO ONE has taken action in the last 5 years then it appears that Obama WILL STAY President UNDER MARTIAL LAW!!!
However, the CEO of ANY Corporation, including THE UNITED STATES, INC., can NOT give an Order to have ANYONE MURDERED!!!

Michael Shrimpton trial delayed until after 2014 elections, Shrimpton Obama born in Mombasa Kenya, CIA collected DNA from Obama and grandparent, Shrimpton to subpoena CIA and British intelligence records on Obama
https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2014/04/21/michael-shrimpton-trial-delayed-until-after-2014-elections-shrimpton-obama-born-in-mombasa-kenya-cia-collected-dna-from-obama-and-grandparent-shrimpton-to-subpoena-cia-and-british-intelligence-reco/

25 counts treason against Obama
http://dinartruthmatrix.net/25-counts-treason-against-obama/
Executive Branch : President Barack Hussien Obama Executive Orders
Obama took the Presidential Oath, swearing to “.. preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” but has: Article 1, Sect. 1

Don't Forget: The ACT of 1871 formed the corporation called THE UNITED STATES
http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/the-act-of-1871-formed-the-corporation-called-the-united-states

HOT HOT Central Bank calls his "JP Morgan" the U.S. to open a branch in Iraq

HOT HOT Central Bank calls his "JP Morgan" the U.S. to open a branch in Iraq

04/22/2014

Tomorrow's Press / BAGHDAD: The governor of the Iraqi Central Bank and the Agency Abdel Basset Turki, on Tuesday, that the bank had invited his counterpart, "JP Morgan" the U.S. to open a branch in the country, while noting that the opening of the banks will facilitate transfers of financial and opens credit banking reliable global by the citizens.He said Turkish for "tomorrow's Press," that "there are major banks opened offices in Baghdad and there are requests to open new branches inevitably to the Department of Central Bank of Iraq," noting that "Citigroup Bank of America is the first banking group to open an office in Baghdad."He added that "the central bank extended an invitation to JPMorgan the U.S. presence in Iraq by opening branches in Baghdad and the provinces," stressing that "the opening of such major banks branches in the country will facilitate transfers of financial and opens credits global banking reliable by the citizens." .The United States of American States, which has good relations with Iraq, which has a joint cooperation in the agricultural and commercial sectors.

Is the Obamacare Website Secretly Violating your Privacy Rights?

Is the Obamacare Website Secretly Violating your Privacy Rights?

by Onan Coca / 23 April 2014

There are plenty of reasons to not like Obamacare. There are plenty of reasons to be dubious of the federal government when it comes to obeying our laws. If you put the two of those things together, there is a lot of reason for us to be worried about what Obamacare will do to our privacy. Imagine a government clearinghouse that gives outside groups (insurance companies) unfettered access to all of our private information. It’s a terrifying thought.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=N54gSI4Aft0

“This is the part of the signup that is hidden," said Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX). "The applicant does not see this, but it is in the source code, and what that blue highlighted area that’s been circled in red says is: ‘You have no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding any communication or data transmitting or stored on this information system."

The confluence of the NSA scandal with the IRS scandal and Obamacare’s implementation should just be too much for us as a nation. Even Democrats have to be realizing that the government cannot be trusted with sensitive and private information.

The problem is really multi-faceted.

The first issue is that our government has proved to be corrupt. Certain segments of the bureaucracy can be bought and encouraged to commit crimes against certain segments of the population. Example? The IRS scandal. The IRS targeted conservative groups using their private information against them. The IRS went even further and had contacts at the FEC and the FBI provide other private information that could be used against conservative non-profits. The IRS malfeasance runs so deep that it has caught up even a respected ranking Democrat on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee – Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), who is now being investigated for having part in the IRS scandal and its cover-up.

The other scandals plaguing our government only add to this breach of trust. The DOJ scandals, the NSA scandal, the White House’s misuse of Census Data and other issues all contribute evidence to the idea that the government cannot and should not be trusted.

The second issue has to do with typical government incompetence. While the federal government should have access to the most advanced technology our world has to offer… the incompetence of the bureaucracy often gets in the way. The government has poured hundreds of millions of dollars and years of work into a web portal that even a fly-by-night company could have put up for a few thousand dollars in just a few days. And the cheaper, less time consuming website would have been better!

But because of government incompetence the website has been a disaster and millions of people have opened themselves up to fraud and theft by trusting it. Our privacy, our personal information, our credit ratings and bank accounts -- even our good name -- are all too important to just hand over to people who are too corrupt or too incompetent to be trusted. Obamacare is dangerous for many reasons… our privacy is just another great reason to end Obamacare.

Read more at http://eaglerising.com/5805/obamacare-website-secretly-violating-privacy-rights/#GyOLMoFi7Yjz0dx8.99