Wednesday, April 23, 2014

WAS HARRY REID CUTING A DEAL WITH CHINA TO GRAB LAND TO COVER NON COLLATERALIZED CDO'S? SECURITY EXCHANGE COMMISSION-CDO'S, HARRY REID, CHINA

WAS HARRY REID CUTING A DEAL WITH CHINA TO GRAB LAND TO COVER NON COLLATERALIZED CDO'S? SECURITY EXCHANGE COMMISSION-CDO'S, HARRY REID, CHINA
It is believed; NONE of this would never been exposed had the duly constituted, outstanding, primary creditor not challenged J.P. MORGANS COLLATERAL BASE.
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2013/10/425250.shtml

(NON COLLATERALIZED "CDO'S)
BOGUS GOLD DERIVATIVES/INSTRUMENTS
and
PENDING U.S. BANKING & FINANCIAL CRASH

By V.K. Durham
2/16/03

http://www.theantechamber.net/V_K_Durham/BogusGoldDeriv.html

To: Chuck Grassley ; William_Anderson@grassley.senate.gov ; Jack McCreery (SEC); Arnie Gammelsgarrd (Bank Fraud Division DK)

U.S. Senator Charles E. Grassley, Former Chairman, U.S. Senate Banking Committee, Present American Judiciary Washington, District of Columbia Federal Offices and Sioux City Iowa Federal Offices
REF: NO NATION. NO NATIONS PEOPLE, NO PERSON, NO INDIVIDUAL "SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FRAUDULENT ACTS COMMITTED BY OTHERS AGAINST THEIR PROPERTIES WITHOUT THEIR "AUTHORIZATION.

"Ref: NON PERFORMING BOGUS BONUS 3392-181 GOLD DERIVATIVES/INSTRUMENTS and

PENDING U.S. BANKING & FINANCIAL CRASH also known as "BANKRUPTCY" of the United States of America.

Ref: JOHN N. PERRY vs THE UNITED STATES DEBT. 294 U.S. 330.


 Was Harry Reid cutting a deal with China with the NEVADA Gold, Silver, Platinum, Iridium, Beridium etc deposits to cover non authorized COLLATERALIZED US DEBT OBLIGATIONS amounting to 1/2 of
$206, 858,581,465,280,000,000.00 due and payable in Gold, Gold Coin, Gold Bullion and/or Coin of the Realm?
Senator Grassley:

The United States of America and ALL DEBTOR NATIONS owe to this DURHAM (INTL. LTD) HOLDING TRUST (TIAS 12087); The amount calculated, notarized and of record with the U.S. Bureau of Public Debt, U.S. Dept. of the Treasury, U.S. Security Exchange Commission the amount calculated as due and payable in gold, gold coin, gold bullion and/or coin of the realm, calculated from May 1, 1875 to May 1, 1990,
$206, 858,581,465,280,000,000.00 including all compoundings and accruals since the first calculations.

For some unknown reason, instead of Debt Payment by the United States to this DURHAM (INTL. LTD;) HOLDING TRUST (TIAS 12087) persons in the capacity of financial management and Payment of Debt's of the United States found it more expedient to UNLAWFULLY and DECEPTIVELY use, by UNAUTHORIZED CONVERSION the COLLATERAL GOLD INTEREST accrued, owned by THE DURHAM (INTL. LTD;) HOLDING TRUST (TIAS 12087) for the purpose of A BANKING & FINANCIAL WAR which, this nation is presently confronted, as her debt to these "parties" illegally and unlawfully using the BOGUS GOLD DERIVATIVES-INSTRUMENTS known as the U.S. Federal Reserve Banking System put under the U.S. DEPT. OF THE TREASURY "UNCONSTITUTIONALLY" by President William J. Clinton in 1994 to conceal the 1991 BRADY BONDS FRAUDS(Click) and the BANKING FAILURES brought about by that particular incident which involved NICHOLAS BRADY and (Sir) ALAN GREENSPAN.

In conformance with 28 U.S.C. EVIDENCE RULES; Documents provided to your Federal Offices which is and was, Hard, Irrefutable, Undeniable Evidence of ORGANIZED CRIMINAL ACTIVITY by parties/persons currently in "Agreement with the Federal Reserve to split 50%-50% all monies taken down on BONUS 3392-181 who now sit in the Philippines awaiting "Instructions from the Fed. R./UST as to when to bring the gold home."
vox
Wednesday, April 23, 2014

The SEC's just been caught colluding with the banks it's supposed to regulate

Updated by Matthew Yglesias on April 11, 2014, 12:30 p.m. ET @mattyglesias matt@vox.com
Reuters finance blogger Felix Salmon had a post earlier this week headlined "Yes, the SEC was colluding with banks on CDO prosecutions." This ought to be huge news. The Securities and Exchange Commission is one of the main agencies that's supposed to be regulating Wall Street. But they've been essentially caught red handed working together with Goldman Sachs to make it look like Goldman was paying a huge fine when really they're paying a small one. Sadly, though, the story probably won't get much attention from the general public because the CDO prosecution issue is a little obscure and it hasn't really been in the news for years.
But people ought to understand this story. It's a very big deal not so much because the case was all that important, but because it speaks directly to the question of whether or not our government institutions have the will and ability to regulate the financial sector.

What's a CDO?

CDO stands for collateralized debt obligation.
To understand what that means, start with something simple like a mortgage or an auto loan. The good news for a lender is that he earns a profit — the interest rate — on the money leant out. The bad news is that the borrower may default.
So now imagine you had ten roughly similar loans. A person who owned-one tenth of each of those loans would earn the same interest rate as someone who owned a single loan, but the odds of all ten loans defaulting simultaneously are low. A package that consisted of one-tenth of ten separate loans would be a very simple form of collateralized debt obligation.
The same principle can be applied, however, to create very complicated securities. Investment banks did a lot of this during the pre-crisis years, and belief that these securities were very safe fueled a lot of lending activity. read more!  http://www.vox.com/2014/4/11/5602188/the-secs-just-been-caught-colluding-with-the-banks-its-supposed-to

Indicted Businessman Names Harry Reid as Alleged Recipient of Massive Bribe

Joint Session Of Congress Counts Electoral College Votes In 2012 Pres. Election

A Utah businessman is rocking both state and national politics after claiming Utah Attorney General John Swallow helped him broker a deal with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to make a federal investigation into his company quietly disappear, the Salt Lake Tribune reports.

Jeremy Johnson was allegedly told that the price would be $600,000, and claims to have made an initial payment of $250,000 when he was slapped with a federal lawsuit.  Now he says he wants his money back.

The Salt Lake Tribune points out that Johnson has no way of knowing whether the funds actually made it to Reid, even if he did make a massive payment to Reid’s alleged intermediary.

Senator Harry Reid’s office has declined to comment.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/12/indicted-businessman-names-harry-reid-as-alleged-recipient-of-massive-bribe/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=story&utm_campaign=ShareButtons

No comments: