Todays
call will be an hour earlier. Iraq has completed all required. We wait. D.C
will explain. http://InstantTeleseminar.com/?eventID=59492568 …
#wearethepeople
Tuesday, September 2, 2014
Condor last night
Condor:
Tuesday Iraq will make announcements and 800# will be
released. Tony is having a conference call with valuable updates on Tuesday.
Not sure what time announcement or call will take place but Sept 2nd shaping up
to be a big day. Approaching 7 am in Iraq.
Simon Black: "The Morning After: What Happens When a Government Destroys It's Currency?"
Simon
Black: "The Morning After: What Happens When a Government Destroys It's
Currency?"
09/01/2014
The morning after: What happens when
a government destroys its currency
Sovereign Man September 1, 2014 Dallas, Texas
Imagine this scene:
"Everyone in the country was in shock. People’s net worth had devalued more than 53% overnight.”
“The value in savings accounts dropped in half and neither merchants nor consumers knew how to react because they had never been through something like it before...”
This is how an American business executive described living through Mexico’s devaluation of the peso exactly 38 years ago on September 1, 1976.
Looking back, it was so obvious.
....
Sovereign Man September 1, 2014 Dallas, Texas
Imagine this scene:
"Everyone in the country was in shock. People’s net worth had devalued more than 53% overnight.”
“The value in savings accounts dropped in half and neither merchants nor consumers knew how to react because they had never been through something like it before...”
This is how an American business executive described living through Mexico’s devaluation of the peso exactly 38 years ago on September 1, 1976.
Looking back, it was so obvious.
....
Mexico had a
mounting debt, destructive policies, and a woefully unsustainable fixed
exchange rate with the US dollar. All the writing was on the wall.
But most people ignored the warning signs and kept their money in pesos.
Mexican President Luis Echevarria even went out on the radio to reassure people that the currency was safe.
Finally, under intense fiscal pressure, the government reached its breaking point. And on August 31, 1976, they made the decision to devalue the peso.
People woke up the next morning on September 1st to a 50%+ decline.
Coincidentally today is also the 75th anniversary of the Nazi invasion of Poland, the event that ultimately dragged the world into war.
Germany had already invaded Austria and Czechoslovakia in the months before.
By May 1939 Hitler had stated very plainly, “the decision remains to attack Poland at the first opportunity.”
Even a week before the invasion, Hitler told his military commanders, “I have prepared . . . my 'Death's Head' formations with orders to kill without pity or mercy all men, women, and children of Polish descent or language.”
Germany had 60 divisions massed on the Polish border ready to invade.
Yet people in Poland were told to keep calm, remain in place, and have confidence in their leaders.
Finally, on August 30, the Polish government ordered a partial mobilization to meet the German threat.
Needless to say, it was too little, too late. Germany invaded only hours later.
This is a familiar story that repeats across history. Despite obvious warning signs, people almost universally allow themselves to ignore reality.
It’s human nature to want to believe that everything is going to be OK. And when our political leaders whisper soothing words of hope and optimism, we take the bait.
But most people ignored the warning signs and kept their money in pesos.
Mexican President Luis Echevarria even went out on the radio to reassure people that the currency was safe.
Finally, under intense fiscal pressure, the government reached its breaking point. And on August 31, 1976, they made the decision to devalue the peso.
People woke up the next morning on September 1st to a 50%+ decline.
Coincidentally today is also the 75th anniversary of the Nazi invasion of Poland, the event that ultimately dragged the world into war.
Germany had already invaded Austria and Czechoslovakia in the months before.
By May 1939 Hitler had stated very plainly, “the decision remains to attack Poland at the first opportunity.”
Even a week before the invasion, Hitler told his military commanders, “I have prepared . . . my 'Death's Head' formations with orders to kill without pity or mercy all men, women, and children of Polish descent or language.”
Germany had 60 divisions massed on the Polish border ready to invade.
Yet people in Poland were told to keep calm, remain in place, and have confidence in their leaders.
Finally, on August 30, the Polish government ordered a partial mobilization to meet the German threat.
Needless to say, it was too little, too late. Germany invaded only hours later.
This is a familiar story that repeats across history. Despite obvious warning signs, people almost universally allow themselves to ignore reality.
It’s human nature to want to believe that everything is going to be OK. And when our political leaders whisper soothing words of hope and optimism, we take the bait.
Looking back, it was plain as day
that Mexico was going to devalue the peso. Everything about the economy and
currency was totally unsustainable. Deep down people knew it.
Similarly, it was plain as day that Hitler was going to decimate Poland. And people knew it.
Yet millions allowed their confidence to be misplaced in leaders who assured them that everything was OK.
Are we so different today?
The raw numbers tell us that most banks in Europe are insolvent. Bank in the US are dangerously illiquid.
Most western governments are bankrupt. Pension and social security funds are insolvent.
Financial markets are at precarious valuations. And the dollar is beginning to unravel as the dominant reserve currency.
These are data-driven assertions. And my guess is, deep down, your instincts are also telling you that something is seriously wrong with the system.
Yet we’re all told to keep calm by our leaders. There’s nothing to see here, nothing to worry about.
Looking back, it’s all going to seem so obvious. If a major, global currency crisis hits within the next 12-months, people will think, “duh, how did I not see that coming?”
Similarly, it was plain as day that Hitler was going to decimate Poland. And people knew it.
Yet millions allowed their confidence to be misplaced in leaders who assured them that everything was OK.
Are we so different today?
The raw numbers tell us that most banks in Europe are insolvent. Bank in the US are dangerously illiquid.
Most western governments are bankrupt. Pension and social security funds are insolvent.
Financial markets are at precarious valuations. And the dollar is beginning to unravel as the dominant reserve currency.
These are data-driven assertions. And my guess is, deep down, your instincts are also telling you that something is seriously wrong with the system.
Yet we’re all told to keep calm by our leaders. There’s nothing to see here, nothing to worry about.
Looking back, it’s all going to seem so obvious. If a major, global currency crisis hits within the next 12-months, people will think, “duh, how did I not see that coming?”
Unfortunately by then it will be too
late.
It takes only a little foresight and planning to insulate yourself from an event that can have disastrous consequences.
If you knew the Mexican peso was at an unsustainable level, why would anyone continue to hold pesos?
Similarly, if all the objective data suggests that the dollar is in store for an epic decline… and that the entire world is on a path to shift away from the dollar, why in the world would any rational person base his entire life savings in dollars?
It takes little effort to actually do something about it. Hold stronger currencies overseas. Own real assets. Move your retirement account abroad where your bankrupt government can’t steal it.
These are common sense steps, just like putting on a seatbelt when you get into a car.
The time to act is now. Why play Russian roulette when the odds are clearly in favor of the house?
Don’t try to time it. Nobody has a crystal ball. It’s irrelevant whether the trend unfolds over weeks, months, or years. It’s pretty clear where this is all headed.
It takes only a little foresight and planning to insulate yourself from an event that can have disastrous consequences.
If you knew the Mexican peso was at an unsustainable level, why would anyone continue to hold pesos?
Similarly, if all the objective data suggests that the dollar is in store for an epic decline… and that the entire world is on a path to shift away from the dollar, why in the world would any rational person base his entire life savings in dollars?
It takes little effort to actually do something about it. Hold stronger currencies overseas. Own real assets. Move your retirement account abroad where your bankrupt government can’t steal it.
These are common sense steps, just like putting on a seatbelt when you get into a car.
The time to act is now. Why play Russian roulette when the odds are clearly in favor of the house?
Don’t try to time it. Nobody has a crystal ball. It’s irrelevant whether the trend unfolds over weeks, months, or years. It’s pretty clear where this is all headed.
Mountain Goat
MR.A.H,I AGREE WITH YOU,BUT SOMETHING TELLS ME THE 11TH
OR 15TH,THEY WILL BE FINISHED ON THE 9TH,THEN THEY WILL NEED A FEW DAYS TO PUT
THIS IN THE GAZETTE,CBI WEBSITE,IMF,UST,OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER,FED.RESERVE,UN
OPERATIONAL RATE OF EXCHANGE AND ALL CENTRAL BANKS,THEN,I MEAN THEN,WE SHOULD
SEE THE RATES IN THE BANK,NO MORE EXCUSES.
YOU KNOW FOREX IS THE PLACE TO WATCH.
WHAT DINAR DEALER IS SELLING THE MOST
DINARS,DINARCORP,DINARBANKER,IBUYDINAR OR WWW.DINARINC.COM WHICH TAKES CREDIT CARDS
AND IS OPEN LATE.WHEN I SEE THE BUY RATES GO UP THIS WEEK,I WILL KNOW WE ARE
CLOSE.
> HI DINARIANS:
>
> I KNOW MANY OF YOU THINK THAT THE REVALUATION OF
CURRENCIES WILL NEVER
> OCCUR. I
GUESS SINCE WE HAVE ALL HEARD EVERY WEEK THAT IT IS GOING TO
> RV AND WE WILL BE AT THE BANKS TOMORROW, I CAN
UNDERSTAND WHY YOU
> WOULD THINK THAT WAY. I AM AS DISAPPOINTED AS ANYONE, BUT I ALWAYS
> KEEP POSITIVE KNOWING THAT IT HAS TO HAPPEN AND NOW
IT IS AT THE END
> FOR SURE.
THAT YOU CAN TAKE TO THE BANK.
THERE HAVE BEEN BANKS
> DURING THE PAST FEW DAYS TELLING PEOPLE TO COME BACK
TUESDAY,
> SEPTEMBER 2nd, BECAUSE THAT IS WHEN THEY WILL BE
ABLE TO DO THE
> CURRENCY EXCHANGES.
SO, WE WILL EITHER HEAR BY TOMORROW MORNING THAT
> IT IS TRUE OR WE WAIT JUST A COUPLE MORE DAYS AFTER
THAT. ONE WAY OR
> ANOTHER, DOES NOT MAKE MUCH DIFFERENCE. IT HAS BEEN WELL WORTH THE WAIT.
>
> WELL, MNT. GOAT POSTS JUST ABOUT EVERY DAY AND SEEMS
TO HAVE A HANDLE
> AS TO THE TIMELINES ON WHAT WE CAN EXPECT FOR THE
ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE
> GOI (GOVERNMENT OF IRAQ). SHE SEEMS TO THINK AS YOU READ BELOW THAT
SEPT. 4th.
> WILL BE THAT DAY AND THE RV ANNOUNCED JUST PRIOR TO
THAT OR JUST AFTER.
> SO, ALTHOUGH WE EXPECT TO BE AT THE BANKS TOMORROW
(TUESDAY) DOING OUR
> CURRENCY EXCHANGES, I GUESS IT COULD BE FRIDAY
BEFORE THAT HAPPENS.
> EITHER WAY, I DO BELIEVE BASED ON EVERYTHING WE HAVE
HEARD IN THE LAST
> SEVERAL DAYS, THIS WILL BE OUR LAST WEEK OF
WAITING. READ HER ENTIRE
> POST AS SHE PUTS IT VERY WELL WHERE WE STAND.
>
>
> *Mnt Goat Monday Morning Update (from Sunday)- “A
New Timeline”*
>
<http://www.dinarrecaps.com/our-blog/mnt-goat-monday-morning-update-a-
> new-timeline>
>
> 09/01/2014
>
> 1 Comment
>
<http://www.dinarrecaps.com/our-blog/mnt-goat-monday-morning-update-a-
> new-timeline#comments>
>
>
>
> *(Thank you George for sending this to Dinar Recaps
Monday morning.)*
>
>
> UU0430 - “A
New Timeline”
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I come to you today to give you a recent update on
the election
> process and how this relates towards the
international rollout of the IQD for Iraq.
>
> Note: If you have not read my previous news letter
from Wednesday
> 8/27, I encourage you to first read it (*LINK
> <http://www.dinarrecaps.com/our-blog/mnt-goat-wednesday-update-part-1-of-2-moving-forward-again>*).
> Today's news letter, as in all my news letters, is a
continuation of
> the ongoing saga of the IQD RV process.
>
> Today’s News
>
> We were expected last week to witness the
announcement of the new
> Iraqi cabinet headed by Haidar al-Abadi. Today is
Sunday 08/31 the
> last day of September and still no formal
announcement of the fully
> formed and seated government of Iraq. Why?
>
> As I have said in previous news letters it is a
struggle to get the
> government completed. I have tried over the last couple weeks to
show you
> the news as to what was delaying the announcement
and formation of
> their government. The recent news tells you they are
down to the final
> phases of assembling this government.
>
> I will now briefly give you a quick summary of last
weeks events then
> bring you to the current and proposed upcoming
events for this week.
>
> Last Week:
>
> They have alrady targeted three previous dates to
announce the fully
> formed government but as they got closer to the date
they realize it
> was not going to happen and so moved to a new date.
This has happened again and again.
>
> Abadi came out late last week stating that 9/4 is
his new target and
> probably could seat the government by that
timeframe. The million
> dollar question is - will he? According to the
constitution he
> technically has until 9/9.
>
> Some are saying that of Abadi does not seat the
government by the
> constitutional deadline that Maliki will simply take
over the process
> and complete it. He will then simply appoint himself
the new prime minister.
>
> Do you see just how ridiculous this news was. Once
again we see the
> seeds of pro-Maliki rearing its ugly head. Simply idiotic
and complete garbage !
> Please, please simply ignore this kind of news. It
makes absolutely no
> sense at all. I do not even know why people bring
this stuff over to
> the forums. Why What is the point? Do you also
believe deep down such
> nonsense could possibly be real?
>
> If they must go beyond the deadline, parliament will
simply vote on a
> referendum allowing them to do so with a new
timeline. It will be for
> a very good reason. However I will also add they are
moving at
> lightening speed and are very much aware of the
necessity to complete
> this new government and get it announced ASAP.
>
> So we saw in the Iraq news that about mid last week
Abadi put together
> a round table to bring in all the players from the
blocs. He
> especially wanted the National Alliance and the
State of Law coalition
> in the discussions. There are just a few minister
positions not yet
> filled and the vie president and deputy vice
president. The alliance
> of the Iraqi powers holds the National Alliance
responsibility for the
> collapse of the round table negotiations for
preventing granting the
> rights of the Sunni component.
>
> We saw how the State of Law boycotted any
discussions and refused to
> give their list of candidates to Abadi after the
bombing of the
> mosque. They required the government to bring the
perpetrators to
> justice. Abadi then held an investigation and four
were arrested. Then
> on Thursday the candidates were finally released to
Abadi. The
> deadlock was over and Abadi made the announcement he
could then
> probably seat the new government by 9/4.
>
> Current News
>
> My news today is direct from my sources in Iraq as
of Sunday 8/31. It
> is all good news and they are moving ahead.
>
> They pointed out that all political blocs are
now participating in
> the negotiations to form a government, disputed
broke out last week to
> nominate four ministers and they finally agree on
granting the
> National Alliance Shiite ministries of defense,
foreign affairs,
> finance, and the Union of Iraqi national forces
Sunni Interior Ministry.
>
> What is left is a single undecided ministry,
Ministry of Oil, in which
> may go to the Kurdistan Alliance. Negotiations are
still in progress
> as I write this news letter. This will probably be
resolved by early this week.
>
> It has not been definitely decided yet who the vice
president and
> deputy vice president are going to be. But this too
will be resolved
> shortly and does not seem to be a huge obstacle
since these positions
> are just more of a formality after the elections are
done.
>
> There are also two of the formerly selected
ministers that are being
> contested by a representative from Najaf and wants
them replaced. The
> minister of health and the minister of utilities.
The President of
> Parliament is giving them two more days to be
replaced and this should
> be done by Tuesday at the latest.
>
> Last week they swore in all ministers already chosen
and began to
> officially seat them. Does this make a complete
government ? No- this
> just means that about 12 of the ministers were
officially seated and
> their names listed in the gazette making it
official. As usual this
> was all hyped up and misunderstood. This was not the
announcement of
> the fully formed government we have been waiting
for. This week there will be yet others.
> They plan to swear in the last 5 ministers and
seated seat them and
> hopefully they can do all this by 9/4 or 9/9 (at the
latest), when
> they are targeting the “formal announcement”.
>
> Believe me when they announce the government it will
be all over the
> international news media channels such as CNN and
FOX news. Don’t you
> get sick and tired of the hype? Why is all this news
from Iraq so
> misinterpreted all the time by the same intel
groups?
>
> Decentralization of Gov’t (con’t)
> .
> Essentially the decentralization effort, as I have
explained in past
> news letters,
is giving more power to the provinces and a check on
> the Federal government.
>
> If you have been reading my news letters all along
you must remember
> the news I have been including about the desire and
necessity by the
> new government to support more autonomy by each of
the six main
> provinces. This is being modeled off of the
State/Federal system in
> American as it will be the Federation of Iraq.
>
> This week we heard the final count of ministries was
down to 17 from 31.
> They combined the duties of some and eliminated
others that were redundant.
> Remember also some ministers were on the payroll but
essentially had
> very little responsibilities. Others that were
redundant and had
> conflicting responsibilities with other ministries.
It was always
> questionable who was actually in charge. Maliki
liked to keep you
> guessing and chaos was the rule of law. This way he
could have control
> over everything yet have no responsibility for the
corruption that was
> ramped. At least this is how he planned it. A side
effect was nothing ever got done.
>
> This past week Dr Allawi was officially appointed to
head up the
> “Federation Council”, hurry, hurry, hurry ! I could
not think of a
> better person for this job. Congrats to Allawi! .
>
> This is the current line up for this coming week
(targeted events):
>
> The parliament Speaker, Saleem al-Jobouri, while
meeting the official
> in Babel Province stated that there are no obstacles
to hinder the
> formation of the next government within the
constitutional time limit.
>
> I personally do not think it will go until 9/9.
>
> This is how I am hearing they plan to roll out the
new government.
>
> September 3, the remaining ministers will be sworn
in.
> September 4, the official list of ministers will be
released to the
> media and the people. They will announce that the
government is “officially”
> completed. They will also announce the new
Federation Council and its
> head Dr Allawi. They will have a photo opp for the
press of the
> council of ministers along with the prime minister
Abadi, his
> deputies, the president , the vice president and
deputy vice president (the presidents council).
>
> The ministers will officially start their jobs
September 9 as Jubouri
> has stated the next official session of parliament
is planned to begin on 9/9.
> We all know there have been promised and concessions
made to all
> parties and political blocs. The trust factor is
very low that this
> new government will not do the same as the Maliki
government. There is
> a stack of bills needing to be passed and
implemented such as HCL and Article 140.
> Parliament will not waist any time.
> On September 9 a bucket of laws is supposed to be
brought before
> Parliament. Following these laws will be the budget
law. Many of these
> laws are to denounce and vote on the repeal of many
of the special
> “Maliki government” laws implemented over the
last 8 years. These
> laws mostly circumvented the constitution and are of
no use.
> Many of the new laws are needed and are laws to
support the effort of
> decentralization and to give more powers to the
provinces.
> Summary
> So today’s news is still good news and we target now
Thursday, Sept
> 4th for a possible announcement. Can they complete
the government by then?
>
> We have seen in the news today the reasons for the
hold up and the delays.
>
> It is not a mystery or a conspiracy of holding back
the formal
> announcement from the world as to why it has not yet
been made.
>
> In the mosque last Friday they announced the
ministers so far, telling
> the people there is progress. The ministers sworn in
so far were
> published in the gazette but not the full set of
ministers to make up
> a complete council of ministers. This has lead to
much confusion among
> news gathers since they do not understand Arabic and
often confuse
> what they are hearing and seeing. I do not know why
but they fail to
> get the big picture over and over again.
>
> THE GOVERNMENT IS SIMPLY NOT YET COMPLETED !
>
> Then when can we expect the RV?
> All I will say is what I have been saying all along
we wait for a
> formal
> (global) announcement to the public that the Iraq
government is now
> fully formed. Many of you asked me if a formal,
public announcement is
> necessary and the answer is a big fat YES
>
>
>
> I do whole heartedly believe that the RV rollout
will be completed
> just prior to or just after this announcement.
>
> I want to emphasize once again this final
announcement of the IQD
> going international will not happen until the USA
feels the Iraq
> government is stable, non-sectarian and is a
functional government.
> This is has been the plan all along. They may have
wavered a bit on
> how the plan was implemented but the overall plan
guidelines have not changed.
>
> Peace and Luv To Ya All,
> Mnt Goat
>
CONGRESSMAN: HILLARY BUSTED IN MONSTER ‘LIE’
CONGRESSMAN:
HILLARY BUSTED IN MONSTER ‘LIE’
Posted by oneway2day
Yesterday I cross posted the James Rosen article summarizing what Obama
was actually aware of pertaining to the Benghazigate Scandal. To summarize what
knowledge Obama had about the Islamic terrorist attack in Benghazi that killed
four Americans including Ambassador Chris Steven with one word – LIAR. Obama
lied AND the President told his Administration surrogates to lie (such as Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and Jay Carney).
Undoubtedly the Mainstream Media
will twist some propaganda to make lite of one these so-called Obama phony
scandals so below is another perspective based on an interview with Rep. Steve
King (R-IA) conducted by WND’s Garth Kant that focuses on the next Dem Party darling
in former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
JRH 1/16/14
Please Support NCCR
***************************
CONGRESSMAN: HILLARY BUSTED IN
MONSTER ‘LIE’
‘I heard her with my own ears’
By GARTH KANT
January 14, 2014
WorldNetDaily
WASHINGTON — President Obama has
problems with credibility, as the world well knows after he disingenuously
insisted, “If you like your health-care plan, you can keep your health-care
plan” about two dozen times in public.
Now, it turns out, the Democrat
most political observers believe will try to replace Obama as president
apparently also has problems telling the truth.
Former Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton lied to the American people about Benghazi, a congressman who recently
returned from a fact-finding trip to Libya told WND.
He said she also lied to Congress.
Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, was
unequivocal when WND asked him, “What makes you so certain that Hillary Clinton
lied?”
“Because,” King replied, “I heard
her with my own ears.”
And, what contradicted her?
“The facts.”
King also had a blistering
response to a famous question posed by Clinton.
During a Senate committee hearing
Jan. 23, 2013, when asked what caused the death of four Americans in Benghazi,
Clinton responded indignantly, “At this point, what difference does it make?”
WND asked King if he had an answer
for her.
“The reason it makes a difference,
Hillary Clinton, is because this administration lied to the American people.
Her voice was one of those voices that lied to the American people.”
WND VIDEO: Part 1 Kant
Interviewing Rep. King
The congressman related how
Clinton and other administration officials were dishonest when they briefed
Congress within a week of the terrorist attack at the U.S. Consulate in
Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012, in which U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens,
computer specialist Sean Smith and CIA security contractors Tyrone Woods and
Glen Doherty were killed.
King said he could not divulge what
was said during a classified briefing he attended, but, “I will just tell you
that the administration’s officials told the same lies to members of Congress
in a classified setting that they told the public five times on Sunday.”
He was referring to appearances on
five political talk shows by then-Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice
on Sept. 16, 2012, during which she claimed the attack was a spontaneous
protest inspired by anger over an obscure anti-Muslim video on the Internet.
“We know that’s false,” King told
WND. “On top of that, we know they knew it was false. They knew within three
hours that it was a calculated, strategized attack by an organized enemy on
that compound and that annex in Benghazi.”
Strong confirmation of King’s version of events has just
come to light, as newly declassified
documents show top defense officials
briefed Obama that a terrorist attack was underway in Benghazi not long after
it began.
During a classified, closed-door
hearing last year, Gen. Carter Ham, who was responsible for U.S. forces in
North Africa, testified that he very quickly got to the point and told
then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, that it was a terrorist attack and not a protest.
Panetta and Dempsey then met
immediately with Obama.
Last February, Panetta told the
Senate Armed Services Committee that he told Obama “there was an apparent
attack going on in Benghazi.”
Panetta said, “There was no
question in my mind that this was a terrorist attack.”
And yet, for the next few weeks,
as the 2012 presidential election reached the crucial home stretch, a number of
aides to both Clinton and Obama repeatedly insisted there was no evidence the
attack on Benghazi was planned, but it appeared to be protest that turned
violent.
That was contradicted by testimony
on May 8, 2013, by U.S. diplomat Gregory Hicks, who was in Libya at the time of
the Benghazi terrorist attack.
He, and two other key witnesses
agreed, there was no basis for Rice to claim the attack began as a protest of
an anti-Islamic film. And yet, Obama and Clinton repeatedly made that claim in
the hours and days after the incident.
Hicks pointedly said he was
“stunned” by Rice’s response to the Benghazi attack.
“My jaw dropped, and I was
embarrassed,” he said.
Hicks was asked if there was any
indication of a protest in Benghazi in response to the Internet video.
“The YouTube video was a non-event
in Libya,” he said.
“We know from the testimony,” King
told WND. “We know it wasn’t the movie. It is a fact that it wasn’t the movie.”
He also pointed out that people
who worked in the intelligence community as well as the State Department have
testified under oath that they knew the movie did not trigger the attack.
“And they (administration
officials) have not retracted them. They were dishonest,” King flatly stated.
The congressman made the blunt
assertions to WND in his first published remarks following a recent trip he
organized to hotspots in North Africa and the Middle East, with Reps. Louie
Gohmert, R-Texas, and Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.
WND VIDEO: Part 2 Kant
Interviewing Rep. King
The Iowan had more answers to
Clinton’s question, “What difference does it make?”
He said, of course, the loss of
Ambassador Stevens and the three other Americans “who stood there bravely to
defend that compound” was a “significant tragedy.”
But, he called the truth an even
bigger casualty.
“[T]he biggest tragedy of this is
this administration came forward within days and began to misinform the
American people on what took place in Benghazi.”
That’s because, King insisted,
“It’s a tragedy when the integrity of the presidency and the administration of
President Obama, or any president of the United States, can be sacrificed for a
political agenda.”
The congressman noted that former
Defense Secretary Robert Gates described in his new book how then-senator and
presidential candidate Clinton took a position against the surge in Iraq in the
presidential primary contests in 2008 for political reasons.
“If political decisions are made
on war policy in Iraq when you’re campaigning for office, and if political
conditions were part of the decision as to whether there would be a surge in
Afghanistan, that’s also part of Gate’s book, then those two things all but
confirm that the story that the administration promoted coming out of Benghazi
was a political story, designed to cover,” charged King.
And why did they need cover?
Because they were in the peak of the president’s re-election campaign, said the
congressman.
He said the administration “should
have told the American people the straight-up truth as soon as they knew it,”
but instead, “they continue to cover-up Benghazi and the only reason they’ve
been allowed to do it is a media that is, for a large part, complicit.”
Conceivably, that could derail
presidential ambitions Clinton might harbor.
Judge Andrew Napolitano says the
former secretary of state could be prosecuted if she did, in fact, lie.
“Lying to Congress carries the
same criminal liability and the same punishment as lying under oath to
Congress. I’m not suggesting that Mrs. Clinton lied, but I’m saying that a case
could be made out, either legally in a courtroom if a prosecutor wanted to, and
certainly politically in a public sphere should she decide to seek higher
office,” Napolitano said, the day after Hicks testified to Congress that the
video played absolutely no role in the Benghazi attack.
WMD VIDEO: Judge Andrew
Napolitano on Benghazi Lies
When WND asked King if those he
spoke with in Libya share his observations about the attack on Benghazi, he
said it depends on who you talk to.
He had nothing but praise for U.S.
Ambassador to Libya Deborah Jones, calling her “excellent” and “terrific.”
“She’s in a very dangerous place,
and she has a very difficult task. She’s upbeat, she’s knowledgeable,” and King
said all of their discussions encouraged him that “we’ve got a good State
Department operating in Libya.”
Follow Garth Kant on Twitter
@DCgarth
________________________________
© Copyright 1997-2014. All Rights Reserved. WND.com.
Share this:
Like this:
Like
Loading...
Leave a comment
Tags: Barack Obama, Benghazi 4, Benghazi Liars, Benghazigate, Carter Ham, Declassified, Garth Kant, Gregory Hicks, Hillary Clinton,
Leon Panetta, Steve King, Susan Rice
The
Benghazi Transcripts: Top Defense officials briefed Obama on ‘attack,’ not
video or protest
Posted by oneway2day
i
Rate
This
Unclassified documents of recent House investigations of
Benghazigate clearly paints a different picture than the Obama Administration
PR and also throws mud in the face of a NY Times investigation that vainly attempted to
validate the Obama Administration. Obama at the top and a handful of high placed officials on the
Military and government were fully aware that the Benghazi attack was an
orchestrated Islamic terrorist attack rather than a spontaneous riot due to a sophomoric anti-Mohammed/anti-Islam
film.
Fox News has an excellent summary
of the revelations in the documents exposing Obama, Hillary and the
Administration as a bunch of liars to the people of the United States of
America. After I cross post the Fox News Story the website Stand Up
America has PDF links to some of those documents which still has some
redaction involved.
JRH 1/15/14 (Hat Tip: Infidels
United)
Please Support NCCR
*********************************
The Benghazi Transcripts: Top
Defense officials briefed Obama on ‘attack,’ not video or protest
By James Rosen
January 14, 2014
Fox News
Minutes after the American
consulate in Benghazi came under assault on Sept. 11, 2012, the nation’s top civilian
and uniformed defense officials — headed for a previously scheduled Oval Office
session with President Obama — were informed that the event was a “terrorist
attack,” declassified documents show. The new evidence raises the question of
why the top military men, one of whom was a member of the president’s Cabinet,
allowed him and other senior Obama administration officials to press a false
narrative of the Benghazi attacks for two weeks afterward.
Gen. Carter Ham, who at the time
was head of AFRICOM, the Defense Department combatant command with jurisdiction
over Libya, told the House in classified testimony last year that it was him
who broke the news about the unfolding situation in Benghazi to then-Defense
Secretary Leon Panetta and Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff. The tense briefing — in which it was already known that U.S.
Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens had been targeted and had gone missing
— occurred just before the two senior officials departed the Pentagon for their
session with the commander in chief.
According to declassified testimony
obtained by Fox News, Ham — who was working out of his Pentagon office on the
afternoon of Sept. 11 — said he learned about the assault on the consulate
compound within 15 minutes of its commencement, at 9:42 p.m. Libya time,
through a call he received from the AFRICOM Command Center.
“My first call was to General
Dempsey, General Dempsey’s office, to say, ‘Hey, I am headed down the hall. I
need to see him right away,'” Ham told lawmakers on the House Armed Services
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation on June 26 of last year. “I told
him what I knew. We immediately walked upstairs to meet with Secretary
Panetta.”
Ham’s account of that fateful day
was included in some 450 pages of testimony given by senior Pentagon officials
in classified, closed-door hearings conducted last year by the Armed Services
subcommittee. The testimony, given under “Top Secret” clearance and only
declassified this month, presents a rare glimpse into how information during a
crisis travels at the top echelons of America’s national security apparatus,
all the way up to the president.
Also among those whose secret
testimony was declassified was Dempsey, the first person Ham briefed about
Benghazi. Ham told lawmakers he considered it a fortuitous “happenstance” that
he was able to rope Dempsey and Panetta into one meeting, so that, as Ham put
it, “they had the basic information as they headed across for the meeting at
the White House.” Ham also told lawmakers he met with Panetta and Dempsey when
they returned from their 30-minute session with President Obama on Sept. 11.
Armed Services Chairman Howard
“Buck” McKeon, R-Calif., sitting in on the subcommittee’s hearing with Ham last
June, reserved for himself an especially sensitive line of questioning: namely,
whether senior Obama administration officials, in the very earliest stages of
their knowledge of Benghazi, had any reason to believe that the assault grew
spontaneously out of a demonstration over an anti-Islam video produced in
America.
Numerous aides to the president
and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton repeatedly told the public in the
weeks following the murder of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans that
night — as Obama’s hotly contested bid for re-election was entering its final
stretch — that there was no evidence the killings were the result of a
premeditated terrorist attack, but rather were the result of a protest gone
awry. Subsequent disclosures exposed the falsity of that narrative, and the
Obama administration ultimately acknowledged that its early statements on
Benghazi were untrue.
“In your discussions with General
Dempsey and Secretary Panetta,” McKeon asked, “was there any mention of a
demonstration or was all discussion about an attack?” Ham initially testified
that there was some “peripheral” discussion of this subject, but added “at that
initial meeting, we knew that a U.S. facility had been attacked and was under
attack, and we knew at that point that we had two individuals, Ambassador
Stevens and Mr. [Sean] Smith, unaccounted for.”
Rep. Brad Wenstrup, R-Ohio, a
first-term lawmaker with experience as an Iraq war veteran and Army reserve
officer, pressed Ham further on the point, prodding the 29-year Army veteran to
admit that “the nature of the conversation” he had with Panetta and Dempsey was
that “this was a terrorist attack.”
The transcript reads as follows:
WENSTRUP:
“As a military person, I am concerned that someone in the military would be
advising that this was a demonstration. I would hope that our military
leadership would be advising that this was a terrorist attack.”
HAM:
“Again, sir, I think, you know, there was some preliminary discussion about,
you know, maybe there was a demonstration. But I think at the command, I
personally and I think the command very quickly got to the point that this was
not a demonstration, this was a terrorist attack.”
WENSTRUP:
“And you would have advised as such if asked. Would that be correct?”
HAM:
“Well, and with General Dempsey and Secretary Panetta, that is the nature of
the conversation we had, yes, sir.”
Panetta told the Senate Armed
Services Committee in February of last year that it was him who informed the
president that “there was an apparent attack going on in Benghazi.” “Secretary
Panetta, do you believe that unequivocally at that time we knew that this was a
terrorist attack?” asked Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla. “There was no question in my
mind that this was a terrorist attack,” Panetta replied.
Senior State Department officials
who were in direct, real-time contact with the Americans under assault in
Benghazi have also made clear they, too, knew immediately — from surveillance
video and eyewitness accounts — that the incident was a terrorist attack. After
providing the first substantive “tick-tock” of the events in Benghazi, during a
background briefing conducted on the evening of Oct. 9, 2012, a reporter asked
two top aides to then-Secretary Clinton: “What in all of these events that
you’ve described led officials to believe for the first several days that this
was prompted by protests against the video?
”
“That is a question that you would
have to ask others,” replied one of the senior officials. “That was not our
conclusion.”
Ham’s declassified testimony
further underscores that Obama’s earliest briefing on Benghazi was solely to
the effect that the incident was a terrorist attack, and raises once again the
question of how the narrative about the offensive video, and a demonstration
that never occurred, took root within the White House as the explanation for
Benghazi.
The day after the attacks, which
marked the first killing of an American ambassador in the line of duty since
1979, Obama strode to the Rose Garden to comment on the loss, taking pains in
his statement to say: “We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs
of others.” As late as Sept. 24, during an appearance on the talk show “The
View,” when asked directly by co-host Joy Behar if Benghazi had been “an act of
terrorism,” the president hedged, saying: “Well, we’re still doing an
investigation.”
The declassified transcripts show
that beyond Ham, Panetta and Dempsey, other key officers and channels
throughout the Pentagon and its combatant commands were similarly quick to
label the incident a terrorist attack. In a classified session on July 31 of
last year, Westrup raised the question with Marine Corps Col. George Bristol,
commander of AFRICOM’s Joint Special Operations Task Force for the Trans Sahara
region.
Bristol, who was traveling in
Dakar, Senegal when the attack occurred, said he received a call from the Joint
Operations Center alerting him to “a considerable event unfolding in Libya.”
Bristol’s next call was to Lt. Col. S.E. Gibson, an Army commander stationed in
Tripoli. Gibson informed Bristol that Stevens was missing, and that “there was
a fight going on” at the consulate compound.
WESTRUP:
“So no one from the military was ever advising, that you are aware of, that
this was a demonstration gone out of control, it was always considered an
attack -“
BRISTOL:
“Yes, sir.”
WENSTRUP:
“– on the United States?”
BRISTOL:
“Yes, sir. … We referred to it as the attack.”
Staffers on the Armed Services
subcommittee conducted nine classified sessions on the Benghazi attacks, and
are close to issuing what they call an “interim” report on the affair. Fox News
reported in October their preliminary conclusion that U.S. forces on the night
of the Benghazi attacks were postured in such a way as to make military rescue
or intervention impossible — a finding that buttresses the claims of Dempsey
and other senior Pentagon officials.
While their investigation
continues, staffers say they still want to question Panetta directly. But the
former defense secretary, now retired, has resisted such calls for additional
testimony.
“He is in the president’s
Cabinet,” said Rep. Martha Roby R-Ala., chair of the panel that collected the
testimony, of Panetta. “The American people deserve the truth. They deserve to
know what’s going on, and I honestly think that that’s why you have seen —
beyond the tragedy that there was a loss of four Americans’ lives — is that the
American people feel misled.”
“Leon Panetta should have spoken
up,” agreed Kim R. Holmes, a former assistant secretary of state under
President George W. Bush and now a distinguished fellow at the Heritage
Foundation. “The people at the Pentagon and frankly, the people at the CIA
stood back while all of this was unfolding and allowed this narrative to go on
longer than they should have.”
Neither Panetta’s office nor the
White House responded to Fox News’ requests for comment.
James Rosen joined Fox News
Channel (FNC) in 1999. He currently serves as the chief Washington
correspondent and hosts the online show “The Foxhole.”
_______________________________
Top Secret Transcripts Revealed
on Benghazi
Posted by SUAadmin
January 13, 2014
Stand Up America
Editor’s
Note – We have been hearing that much is due to be released on
Benghazi that to date has been hidden, lied about, or just plain stonewalled.
Below is the official release from the Armed Services Committee, through its Chairmen, Buck McKeon (R-CA 25).
It is clearly time for all the
facts to come out and for those who have broken the law, or tried to obstruct
the committee’s investigation to be held fully accountable.
These recently de-classified
documents relating to Benghazi, with some redaction, demonstrates an enduring
power struggle between the Dept. of Defense and the State Department when it
came to protection of U.S. sovereign territory in foreign countries. Due
to the tacit and a non-agreed to agenda of the State Department, Hillary
Clinton apparently prevailed at will.
Mrs. Clinton mobilized friends for
the creation of an Accountability Review Board that performed a shallow and
political investigation into the attack on the two U.S. compounds in Benghazi
resulting in the death of 4 Americans, but what is most revealing is that the
final decision to send military aid to Benghazi rested with Barack Obama.
In the end, Hillary Clinton kept
her global reputation and Barack Obama never made a rescue call, telling us
that politics were more important than saving the lives of the four and
endangering up to as many as 40 others in Benghazi. They were left in abject
peril for political reasons. Sadly, the lies of Benghazi are now proven.
Declassified Transcripts of
Benghazi Briefings Released
Armed Services Committee
Examined Actions Of Military Chain Of Command Before, During, and After Attack
WASHINGTON— The House Armed
Services Committee today released a series of recently declassified transcripts
of briefings on the September 11th 2012 attack on Americans in Benghazi, Libya.
The briefings were conducted by the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations then chaired by Rep. Martha Roby (R-AL), though they were open
to all members of the Committee and attended by Members off the Committee.
The briefings, which took place
over the course of several months, were part of the Committee’s examination of
the actions of the military chain of command before, during, and after the attack.
A report summarizing the conclusion of the HASC Oversight & Investigations
majority Members draw from these briefings is expected to be released later
this week.
Read the transcripts linked
below:
o Transcript #1 – 1_Briefing transcript
(redacted), “DOD’s preparation for the terrorist attacks in Benghazi,” (Part I,
Session I, DOD), May 21, 2013.pdf (3.7
MBs)
o Transcript #2 – 2_Briefing transcript
(redacted), “DOD’s preparation for the terrorist attacks in Benghazi,” (Part I,
Session II DOD), May 21, 2013.pdf
(642.4 KBs)
o Transcript #3 – 3_Briefing transcript
(redacted), “DOD’s preparation for the terrorist attacks in Benghazi,” (Part
II, AFRICOM), June 26, 2013.pdf (9.2
MBs)
o Transcript #4 – 4_Briefing transcript
(redacted), “DOD’s preparation for the terrorist attacks in Benghazi,” (Part
III, Colonel Bristol), July 31, 2013.pdf
(10.8 MBs)
o Transcript #5 – 5_Hearing transcript,
“DOD’s posture for September 11, 2013,” (Part IV, Force Posture), September 19,
2013.pdf (691.9 KBs)
o Transcript #6 – 6_Briefing transcript
(redacted), “DOD’s force posture in anticipation of September 11, 2012,” (Part
V, General Dempsey), October 10, 2013.pdf (2.3 MBs)
_________________________________
The Benghazi Transcripts:
Top Defense officials briefed Obama on ‘attack,’ not video or protest
©2014 FOX News Network, LLC.
All rights reserved.
______________________________
Top Secret Transcripts
Revealed on Benghazi
Copyright © 2010 – 2014 Stand Up America US. All rights
reserved.
About SUA
The Standard Bearer for
the Conservancy of the Constitution
Who We Are:
The Stand Up America US
Project (SUA) was founded in 2005
by MG Paul E. Vallely, US Army (Ret), as a multi-media organization that
involves publishing, radio, television, speaking engagements, web site, writing
articles for publication as well as books. This site is meant as a resource for
education, based upon the values and principles set forth by our founding fathers.
It is our goal to inform, clarify, and speak truth to power. We are a network
of patriotic Americans from all walks of life including former members of the
military, former federal, state, and local employees of government, analysts,
writers, world leaders, and our group extends across the globe.
SUA is also an intelligence
gathering and analyzing group that is and has briefed our government leadership
on all manners of international interest, terrorism, and anything that affects
the life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness of our citizenry and way of life.
SUA has briefed the FBI, Congress, law enforcement, and many other agencies.
All our work is based on the following conservative values, and principals:
o The
United States of America’s CONSTITUTION – The intent of our Founding Fathers;
o American
Exceptionalism, and the grand experiment of representative republicanism;
o Upholding
all our 1st Amendment Rights;
o Upholding
all our 2nd Amendment Rights;
o Upholding
all our 10th Amendment Rights;
o The
Rule-of-Law, not of man or men, nor cult of personality;
o Strong
National Defense and Secure Borders;
o National
and State Sovereignty;
o Capitalism
and Western economic values;
o A
safe and secure Israel;
o Supporting
Our Uniformed Services and Veterans;
o Individual
Liberties and Personal Responsibility;
o Fiscally-Responsible,
Limited Government;
o Reclaiming
our Republic and returning to the original intent of the Constitution, and
more!
Mission Statement
Stand Up
America US was created to be an educational forum based upon the values and
principles that our founding fathers intended for the creation of the greatest
form of government ever conceived and implemented. Based upon the convictions
set forth in the Declaration of Independence, the creation of the Constitution,
and the rights endowed by our creator, basing our future on such things as the
Federalist Papers, The Law Of Nations, and the … READ THE REST
Share this:
http://oneway2day.wordpress.com/tag/carter-ham/Guess who was missing at funeral of highest ranking officer killed in combat
Subject: Guess who was missing at funeral of highest ranking officer
killed in combat
Our president has no respect for our Armed Forces or anything that
most Americans hold dear.
Respect.
U.S. Army Major General Harold Greene was buried today at
Arlington National Cemetery with full military honors, including a
caisson, two escort platoons, casket team, firing party,
colors team, and a caparisoned horse. The U.S. Army band,
“Pershing’s Own,” played softly as the funeral procession made its way down the
long hill past the rows of simple white gravestones to bring General Greene to
his final resting place.
The graveside service began with a few words, followed by a 13-gun
salute. The major general’s widow, Dr. Susan Myers, was seated in the front
row. To her right was their son 1st Lt. Matthew Greene, his daughter Amelia
Greene, followed by Major General Greene’s father, also Harold Greene.
After three rifle volleys and the playing of “Taps,” the American
flag, once placed on the major general’s casket, was carefully folded as the band
played “America the Beautiful.” U.S. Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno
presented the flag to his widow, and additional flags to his children and
father.
General Greene, 55, became the highest-ranking fatality in the war
in Afghanistan after an Afghan
military police officer opened fire on Aug. 5th, 2014.
Some People were missing: NO President; NO Vice President;
NO Secretary of State; NO Secretary of Defense. It WAS confirmed, however,
that President Obama was playing golf at the time of the funeral.
One thought on “Carter Ham – New Interim President”
One
thought on “Carter Ham – New Interim President”
It
was good that Obama Fired many Military High Ranking Officers as that opened
the door for a top ranking General to take control as having an election to
take down a Treasonous President would be considered a Coup.
And you can NOT have a present Military General that is on duty to reveal the upcoming Coup.
If Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court Failed to take actions against Obama, and many of them are BAR members, then you need to get a Military General that will take down the Present Corrupt Government!
The Interim President can only stay in office for 6 months until there is an Election for the People to vote, and that is why there were 8 presidents before Washington and no one mentions them.
And you can NOT have a present Military General that is on duty to reveal the upcoming Coup.
If Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court Failed to take actions against Obama, and many of them are BAR members, then you need to get a Military General that will take down the Present Corrupt Government!
The Interim President can only stay in office for 6 months until there is an Election for the People to vote, and that is why there were 8 presidents before Washington and no one mentions them.
KTFA CC Notes by BulldogFord65 Monday Night 9-1-14
KTFA
CC Notes by BulldogFord65 Monday Night 9-1-14
09/01/2014
BulldogFord65 » HELLO FAMILY: THANKS TO THE HOLIDAY, I WAS
ABLE TO BE ON THE CALL TONIGHT AND TAKE NOTES.
I CANNOT PROMISE TO CONTINUE DUE TO MY WORK, BUT I WILL TAKE NOTES WHENEVER POSSIBLE.
IQD update
• Please do not call Frank with questions about what other websites are saying
• in 2010, Maliki did not win the election, but he was appointed PM; in 2014 Maliki did win the election, but he was not appointed PM – the USA is in control
• when O pulled out our troops to keep his campaign promises, M took advantage and destroyed the nation; now our troops are back, and now ISIS is a threat; Frank would not speak about what was going on in deference to the safety of our troops; in the past 2 weeks, we now see that Syria is joining the fight against ISIS and American prisoners were released by Syrian rebels, etc…. again, the USA is in control
....
I CANNOT PROMISE TO CONTINUE DUE TO MY WORK, BUT I WILL TAKE NOTES WHENEVER POSSIBLE.
IQD update
• Please do not call Frank with questions about what other websites are saying
• in 2010, Maliki did not win the election, but he was appointed PM; in 2014 Maliki did win the election, but he was not appointed PM – the USA is in control
• when O pulled out our troops to keep his campaign promises, M took advantage and destroyed the nation; now our troops are back, and now ISIS is a threat; Frank would not speak about what was going on in deference to the safety of our troops; in the past 2 weeks, we now see that Syria is joining the fight against ISIS and American prisoners were released by Syrian rebels, etc…. again, the USA is in control
....
• in the past 2 years, intel has been
gathered against M, and at last he has given up and announced he is stepping
down
• although we have troops in Iraq, it’s been kept quiet, and our troops have eradicated ISIS and DASH, they are controlled; all will be kept quiet until the new GOI is announced likely next week, in Frank’s opinion; USA will not do any more until the government is announced
• in Frank’s opinion, the GOI has already been formed and functioning, the news articles state it’s still being formed, however based on their actions, the GOI is already formed and functioning
• the new GOI was looking for help, and the USA and coalition pounded ISIS; they retreated to Iran, and Iran would not give them safety, so they retreated to Syria; Assad, Arab League and even Hamas have helped in their own way; insurgents are being routed and giving up; the EU (even France), Australians, etc are all joining in the coalition to combat the situation as the MR moves forward and cannot be stopped
• Iraqi banks are open in foreign countries – that is powerful
• In Frank’s opinion, USA is in control, however surrounding with the coalition and Iraqi forces so they get the credit, will not appear as controlled by USA – can’t go in to a sovereign nation and fight; this must be seen as an Arab victory, so surrounding with not only the good guys, but some bad guys have joined the fight also, credit will go to coalition with Arab forces
• To understand ISIS better, research “levant”; when did all the bad guys turn good, and why are they trying to help? Could it be they know there is a MR coming? The whole world has helped this time to speed up things
• 60% of the coalition is from the ME! This is a new attitude, a new mind-set; what Iraq is doing is formidable, they have formed an all-inclusive GOI, perhaps not perfectly balanced, but all are represented and equal; it is the antithesis of what Sadam and M did and were; the other ME nations are willing to help as they see what is going on, and what Iraq is doing with the new GOI
• How is Africa looking these days? Does it look secure? In Frank’s opinion, following the pattern in the ME, it will put us in Africa in 10 years; study military history
• In 2011 Frank asked Kim Clement about the timeline for the RV, and he replied with during the summer months, there will be nothing (2011), nothing (2012), nothing(2013) and then suddenly(2014)
• Iraqia TV announced that a new govt is formed with a new attitude, new cooperation
• What is happening now is about securing the MR and GOI
• Frank read several article titles: CBI calls for ministers to work the new system of payments; the opening of the trade bank of Iraq in the southeast part of Iraq; announcement of 100,000 housing units being funded; gov’t calls for funding for projects for next 5 years; Iranian counsel emphasized the cooperation of ME nations to uproot insurgents; Hakim assured supreme islamic counsel and national alliance that conflict is over; census used for article 140, etc; how can laws be passed if a GOI is not seated and functioning in private???
• The lava flow is revenue stream now; Iraq is witnessing a state of stability and revenue stream is being created by oil sales right before our eyes
• Paris club debt: 80% has been forgiven, and we will likely see that 20% has been paid; Paris club bank shut down for 24 years has been opened again
• Former CBI governor Shaleh demands that what happened with the Rafadin bank opening in London needs to happen in other countries so Iraq can catch up with global developments which includes all access to foreign trading
• Go to Saturday’s post 211 by Backdoc, look at his opinion of timing with the GOI formation announcement
• Frank then switched gears to the Vietnamese Dong, and showed a newspaper article, Vietnam seeking US counter to China
• Recall about a month ago, China and Russia signed the largest oil deal in history; China and Russia approached BRICS to separate themselves from the USD and IMF; this created a revenue stream for the VND; the same thing that is happening with the IQD is happening with the VND
Nova came on the call at this point
Nova said the importance of what we’re seeing in Iraq, think of analogy of our home budget – either need to have revenue stream (income) or savings, or you can’t have a budget; Iraq could not have a budget because they have had neither revenue or savings; just having an internationally tradable currency does not automatically cause it to have a high value; if there’s no revenue, the currency may be international, but not have any value; what China and Russia have done is to include the VND in the biggest oil deal in history, if the VND is used for settlement currency outside of the USD, then it creates a use, a demand – which increases value; with the IQD, a demand for the currency is being created, and with the demand, the value is being created; Iraq can then decide if they want to sell bonds
• In Nova’s opinion, politics always follows money; politics is worthless without money; in Nova’s opinion, history has shown that money happens first, then politics
• Frank asked all to look at who is being appointed to central banks and what they are doing; Iraq’s new PM is pro-currency reform
Eagle1 joined the call at this point
• In Eagle1’s opinion, GCR is more than just a function of revalued currencies, if nations are on the brink of bankruptcy and national debt cannot be paid, currency change is not necessarily a good thing; so, 4 years ago, a plan was put in place to redeem gold bonds, some dating back 150 years, and these bonds are being repatriated, in Eagle1’s opinion; in E1’s opinion our national debt will be paid off by this
• Frank asked E1 his thoughts on the VND? E1’s opinion is that the VND value will increase significantly, likely more than any have supposed, in his opinion
• Frank asked Eagle1 to end the call with prayer, and Andy lifted the prayer with the shofar horn blast
• Frank left with this parting comment: in his opinion, the new GOI will be announced on Sept 9 or 10; the IR could be simultaneous, or soon after – but as always, Frank does not know the date or rate; remember also that Oct 1 is the beginning of the new year; take it all to God in prayer
• although we have troops in Iraq, it’s been kept quiet, and our troops have eradicated ISIS and DASH, they are controlled; all will be kept quiet until the new GOI is announced likely next week, in Frank’s opinion; USA will not do any more until the government is announced
• in Frank’s opinion, the GOI has already been formed and functioning, the news articles state it’s still being formed, however based on their actions, the GOI is already formed and functioning
• the new GOI was looking for help, and the USA and coalition pounded ISIS; they retreated to Iran, and Iran would not give them safety, so they retreated to Syria; Assad, Arab League and even Hamas have helped in their own way; insurgents are being routed and giving up; the EU (even France), Australians, etc are all joining in the coalition to combat the situation as the MR moves forward and cannot be stopped
• Iraqi banks are open in foreign countries – that is powerful
• In Frank’s opinion, USA is in control, however surrounding with the coalition and Iraqi forces so they get the credit, will not appear as controlled by USA – can’t go in to a sovereign nation and fight; this must be seen as an Arab victory, so surrounding with not only the good guys, but some bad guys have joined the fight also, credit will go to coalition with Arab forces
• To understand ISIS better, research “levant”; when did all the bad guys turn good, and why are they trying to help? Could it be they know there is a MR coming? The whole world has helped this time to speed up things
• 60% of the coalition is from the ME! This is a new attitude, a new mind-set; what Iraq is doing is formidable, they have formed an all-inclusive GOI, perhaps not perfectly balanced, but all are represented and equal; it is the antithesis of what Sadam and M did and were; the other ME nations are willing to help as they see what is going on, and what Iraq is doing with the new GOI
• How is Africa looking these days? Does it look secure? In Frank’s opinion, following the pattern in the ME, it will put us in Africa in 10 years; study military history
• In 2011 Frank asked Kim Clement about the timeline for the RV, and he replied with during the summer months, there will be nothing (2011), nothing (2012), nothing(2013) and then suddenly(2014)
• Iraqia TV announced that a new govt is formed with a new attitude, new cooperation
• What is happening now is about securing the MR and GOI
• Frank read several article titles: CBI calls for ministers to work the new system of payments; the opening of the trade bank of Iraq in the southeast part of Iraq; announcement of 100,000 housing units being funded; gov’t calls for funding for projects for next 5 years; Iranian counsel emphasized the cooperation of ME nations to uproot insurgents; Hakim assured supreme islamic counsel and national alliance that conflict is over; census used for article 140, etc; how can laws be passed if a GOI is not seated and functioning in private???
• The lava flow is revenue stream now; Iraq is witnessing a state of stability and revenue stream is being created by oil sales right before our eyes
• Paris club debt: 80% has been forgiven, and we will likely see that 20% has been paid; Paris club bank shut down for 24 years has been opened again
• Former CBI governor Shaleh demands that what happened with the Rafadin bank opening in London needs to happen in other countries so Iraq can catch up with global developments which includes all access to foreign trading
• Go to Saturday’s post 211 by Backdoc, look at his opinion of timing with the GOI formation announcement
• Frank then switched gears to the Vietnamese Dong, and showed a newspaper article, Vietnam seeking US counter to China
• Recall about a month ago, China and Russia signed the largest oil deal in history; China and Russia approached BRICS to separate themselves from the USD and IMF; this created a revenue stream for the VND; the same thing that is happening with the IQD is happening with the VND
Nova came on the call at this point
Nova said the importance of what we’re seeing in Iraq, think of analogy of our home budget – either need to have revenue stream (income) or savings, or you can’t have a budget; Iraq could not have a budget because they have had neither revenue or savings; just having an internationally tradable currency does not automatically cause it to have a high value; if there’s no revenue, the currency may be international, but not have any value; what China and Russia have done is to include the VND in the biggest oil deal in history, if the VND is used for settlement currency outside of the USD, then it creates a use, a demand – which increases value; with the IQD, a demand for the currency is being created, and with the demand, the value is being created; Iraq can then decide if they want to sell bonds
• In Nova’s opinion, politics always follows money; politics is worthless without money; in Nova’s opinion, history has shown that money happens first, then politics
• Frank asked all to look at who is being appointed to central banks and what they are doing; Iraq’s new PM is pro-currency reform
Eagle1 joined the call at this point
• In Eagle1’s opinion, GCR is more than just a function of revalued currencies, if nations are on the brink of bankruptcy and national debt cannot be paid, currency change is not necessarily a good thing; so, 4 years ago, a plan was put in place to redeem gold bonds, some dating back 150 years, and these bonds are being repatriated, in Eagle1’s opinion; in E1’s opinion our national debt will be paid off by this
• Frank asked E1 his thoughts on the VND? E1’s opinion is that the VND value will increase significantly, likely more than any have supposed, in his opinion
• Frank asked Eagle1 to end the call with prayer, and Andy lifted the prayer with the shofar horn blast
• Frank left with this parting comment: in his opinion, the new GOI will be announced on Sept 9 or 10; the IR could be simultaneous, or soon after – but as always, Frank does not know the date or rate; remember also that Oct 1 is the beginning of the new year; take it all to God in prayer
|
KTFA Monday Night Conference Call with Frank26, Nova and
Eagle1.
Approx.150 Minutes long. The first part is Business Promo Night and the second part is Iraq/Dinar Intel.
PLAYBACK # : 760.569.7699 PIN: 156996#
https://www.freeconferencecallhd.com/playback.html?n=OTQCw/jTvsj
Approx.150 Minutes long. The first part is Business Promo Night and the second part is Iraq/Dinar Intel.
PLAYBACK # : 760.569.7699 PIN: 156996#
https://www.freeconferencecallhd.com/playback.html?n=OTQCw/jTvsj
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)