Tuesday, September 29, 2015

Asteroid on course for pass of Earth TOMORROW Sep 30th


Asteroid that could wipe out LONDON on course for hair-raising pass of Earth TOMORROW

 

An asteroid big enough to destroy LONDON will make a nerve wrackingly close pass of the Earth TOMORROW


 The asteroid is large enough to destroy a city


Most asteroid passes classed as "near-Earth" by Nasa fly by at millions of miles away, but the space rock 2015 SZ2, due tomorrow, is estimated to be on an orbit of just 309,000 miles - only 1.3 times the distrance from Earth to the Moon (238,000 miles).

Significant asteroids pass Earth every week, and Nasa monitors them at up to 12 million miles away, so this is considered a cosmic close shave.

A rock of 50 metres could destroy all of London out to the M25 boundary, and a space rock of 100  metres long or more could devastate a continent, causing mass destruction and tsunamis.

But the US space agency insists it and all the others WILL pass by safely - for the next few hundred years at least.

The cosmic skim comes straight after wild predictions were made online that a huge space rock would strike Puerto Rico by the end of this month....something that doesn't appear to have  materialized.

Fears became so widespread a rock may be about to strike that Nasa took the unusual move of issuing a statement ruling this out.

The most unsettling pass was a monster 270-metre space rock called 2012 TT5 - one of six "near-earth" flybys between September 22 and TODAY when online doomsday prophets claimed the world could end.

A space rock of 50 metres could destroy London out to the M25 
A space rock of 50 metres could destroy London out to the M25
 



Nasa gave a running comet on Twitter as it safely passed us on Thursday.
 
Its Asteroid Watch Twitter account tweeted: "As was previously known & expected, asteroid 2012 TT5 safely passed Earth at (9:40 am BST) by 5 million miles."
 
This morning it added: "There are no current threats."
Doommongers had predicted the "end of days" due to a range of Bible codes, so-called prophecies, and alledged other predictions.
 
NASA gives each asteroid a "condition code" from zero to nine of how certain it is about its predicted orbital path.
 
A zero means there is "good certainty" about it, while nine means it is highly uncertain with numbers in between on a sliding scale.
 
The cruise-ship-sized rock 2012 TT5 scored six, meaning there was quite high uncertainty about its position, but Nasa appears to have been spot on in the end.
 

Paul Chodas, of Nasa's Near-Earth Object office at its Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, said: 
 
"There is no existing evidence that an asteroid or any other celestial object is on a trajectory that will impact Earth.  In fact, not a single one of the known objects has any credible chance of hitting our planet over the next century."
 
Nasa has also published a statement on its website reassuring the global public the scare stories are not true. Mr Chodas added: "There is no scientific basis, not one shred of evidence, that an asteroid or any other celestial object will impact Earth on those dates. "If there were any objects large enough to do that type of destruction in September, we would have seen something of it by now."
 
Nasa DOES track about 13,000 "near-Earth asteroids" but accepts this figure is only about 2% of those out there and it has no idea of the whereabouts to the remaining 98% of them. 
 
Of the 13,000, around 1,607 are classified as "potentially hazardous" meaning they are big enough and come within a few million miles of Earth - a distance considered a brush past in cosmic terms.





A series of  
A series of "Blood Moons" ending in September has led to doomsday prophecies



The claim appears to have its origins in a self-proclaimed prophet Rev Efraid Rodriguez, who says he wrote to Nasa warning of the strike after receiving a message from God.

He claims he saw a vision of it "entering the airspace of the town of Arecibo in Puerto Rico, striking the sea between the island of Mona and Mayagüez and triggering a magnitude 12 earthquake".

Many "end of world" prophecies have clearly been made before and passed without incident. 

Still, the latest online doomsday prophecies have been read by so many people that NASA was forced to issue a statement, reiterated this week, saying the chances of an impact around that time or within the next few hundred years were next to zero.

So which asteroids were due to pass close to us between September 22 and today, and what were the chances of them posing any danger?

There were SIX so-called "close approaches" of "near Earth" asteroids due to pass within a cosmic fraction of the planet within the doom mongers' seven-day predicted timescale - but they have now all passed safely.

Scientists predict it would take an impact from an asteroid of 1km (0.6miles) in length and upwards to actually kill off most life on the planet.
 
How big are these six?

Of the six, those due last Tuesday, Sunday, September 27 and today, are estimated as being up to 57, 39 and 31-metres-long respectively.

In June 1908 the Tunguska asteroid exploded in the atmosphere above Siberia and is the most recent major one in world history.

It saw a 50-metre lump of extraterrestrial rock rain down, flattening around 80 million trees, and sending a shock wave across Russia measuring five on the Richter scale.

We found the biggest rocks set to pass were Tuesday and last Thursday, September 24.

In fact, on Tuesday, two asteroids whistled past - one of which was up to 190 metres long - the length of eight train carriages - and another cruise ship-sized space rock of about 280 metres long.

Last Thursday, the whopping 270 metre cruise ship asteroid passed at 5 million miles.

 
There has never been so much interest in the risk to Earth from asteroids
There has never been so much interest in the risk to Earth from asteroids



How far away are they?

NASA monitors massive asteroids that pass by several million miles from Earth and smaller ones at up to about 7m miles. 

It seems far, but put into context the moon is 238,800 miles from us and our closest planet is Venus at 25m miles away, so the "near Earth asteroids" pass closer to the moon than other planets, and their orbits vary.

The furthest pass of the largest three was last Tuesday when the 280-metre asteroid flew by at a relatively safe 14.7 million miles from us.

Asteroid 2012 TT% Impact Earth on Sept 24 2015?

 





How certain was Nasa about their approach path?

NASA gives each asteroid a "condition code" from zero to nine of how certain it is about the predicted orbital path it gives.

A zero means there is "good certainty" about it, while nine means it is highly uncertain, with numbers in between on a sliding scale.

Only one of the six scored a zero - fortunately the biggest 280 metres which passed by on Tuesday.

All the others scored from five or higher, meaning Nasa has a mid-way certainty on their orbital path or quite high uncertainty in two cases which scored six and seven respectively.

The most uncertain pass was a 57-metre rock on September 23, which had a condition code of seven - but its estimated 18.5m mile flyby and relative small size gave it much room for manoeuvre and it has now gone.

More concerning was the cruise-ship-sized rock, the closest and second largest object, which passed last Thursday, September 24, which scored six.
 
Nasa only knows of 2% of asteroids passing  
Nasa only knows of 2% of asteroids passing "close" to the Earth



NASA has two categories within the near-Earth objects, including those which potentially pose a risk.

Rocks are considered a "potentially hazardous asteroid" (PHA) if they are within 4.6m miles of Earth and at least 100 metres across.

NASA says a rock of such size hitting us is "big enough to cause regional devastation to human settlements unprecedented in human history in the case of a land impact, or a major tsunami in the case of an ocean impact."

They added: "Such impact events occur on average around once per 10,000 years."

So the "cruise ship" - known as asteroid 2012 TT5 - is almost three times the size of the smallest PHA, but its 5.1 million miles estimated pass puts it a cosmic cats whisper of 500,000 miles over the PAH zone.

With the level of uncertainty surrounding its orbit, it could theoretically have come within the PAH boundary.

There is also the NASA admission that it only knows the whereabouts of two per cent of the estimated 800,000 plus asteroids circling close to us so, hypothetically, an object we have no knowledge of could be on course right now.

In late 2013, Russia was unfortunate again when a 20-metre long meteor came from nowhere and unexpectedly exploded above Chelyabinsk in Russia, injuring 1,500 people and damaging around 7,000 buildings.


2012 TT5 is due to pass at 5.1million miles just outside the potentially hazardous zone, but Nasa admits to uncertainty over its pathCelestia•ScottSutherland
2012 TT5 is due to pass at 5.1million miles just outside the potentially hazardous zone, but Nasa ad


 


So should we have worried?   And does that mean modern-day Nostradamuses are wrong?

Nasa was right.  The doommongers were wrong, although a rock of 2012 TT5's size was certainly tracked to ensure it did not deviate from the projected orbit.

Nasa and many scientists still say we need not be worried.
 
It said in a statement: "NASA knows of no asteroid or comet currently on a collision course with Earth, so the probability of a major collision is quite small.
 
"In fact, as best as we can tell, no large object is likely to strike the Earth any time in the next several hundred years.

"NASA has also made asteroid detection a top priority, and are developing strategies for identifying asteroids that could pose a risk to our planet."

http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/592987/End-of-the-world-asteroid-Blood-Moon-September-apocalypse-armageddon-comet-meteor

A sign of Crown ownership of the U.S.? Jeb Bush wants to put Margaret Thatcher on the $10 bill

A sign of Crown ownership of the U.S.? Jeb Bush wants to put Margaret Thatcher on the $10 bill
Posted By: MrFusion [Send E-Mail]
Date: Tuesday, 29-Sep-2015 18:39:35
 

This is at BBC, so I don't think it's a hoax...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeb Bush wants Margaret Thatcher on $10 note
17 September 2015
US Republican presidential hopeful Jeb Bush has picked the UK's former Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, as his choice for the face of the $10 bill.
The former Florida governor made the surprise suggestion during a televised debate for the top Republicans vying for the presidential nomination.
All 11 candidates were asked who they would choose, now the US Treasury has announced plans to put a woman on the redesigned note.
Mr Bush's choice drew applause.
"I would go with Ronald Reagan's partner, Margaret Thatcher," he said, noting it was "probably illegal" and unlikely to happen because she is not American.
But he added: "A strong leader is what we need in the White House, and she certainly was a strong leader that restored the United Kingdom into greatness."
~~~~~ CONTINUE AT: ~~~~~
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-34276001
Image paste-up was actually made by Al Jazeera. 

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=28979 

Donald Trump on the traitorous NAFTA pact


TRUMP THREATENS TO 'BREAK' NAFTA TRADE PACT WITH MEXICO AND CANADA 

Trump calls NAFTA a disaster!

   



Donald Trump is calling the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) a "disaster" and vowing to renegotiate or break the deal if elected president.

"It's a disaster," Trump told CBS's Scott Pelley in an interview airing Sunday on "60 Minutes." 

"We will either renegotiate it or we will break it because you know every agreement has an end.

"Every agreement has to be fair. Every agreement has a defraud claim. We're being defrauded by all these countries," Trump continued.
Trump has blasted trade policies, accusing leaders of allowing China and Mexico to steal U.S. jobs and hurt American workers.

The GOP front-runner also opposed granting 'president' Obama fast-track trade powers.

In his CBS interview, Trump also vowed to tax corporations that move their production overseas.

"Let's say Ford moves to Mexico.  If they want to sell that car in the United States, then they pay a tax," he said.

"Here's what's going to happen: they aren't going to build their plant there, they'll build it in the United States."

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/255053-trump-vows-to-renegotiate-or-break-trade-pact-with-mexico-canada  


 

BREAKING: Obama Issues Chilling Threat to Christians Across America… Spread This Everywhere

BREAKING: Obama Issues Chilling Threat to Christians Across America… Spread This Everywhere

Once Pope Francis boarded a plane back to the Vatican, President Barack Obama wasted not time getting back to business as usual — attacking religious freedom.
On Sunday night, at a Democratic National Committee-sponsored event in New York City billed as an “LGBT gala,” Obama took to the podium and warned Christians across the country that their religious freedom means nothing in the face of gay rights.


Watch Video:

“We affirm that we cherish our religious freedom and are profoundly respectful of religious traditions,” the POTUS said. “But we also have to say clearly that our religious freedom doesn’t grant us the freedom to deny our fellow Americans their constitutional rights.”
Obama patronized Christians and Christian groups about their “genuine concerns,” but ultimately suggested that the issue was being pushed by Republicans who were simply using the concerns to acquire more votes.
“America has left the leaders of the Republican Party behind,” Obama said during his anti-Christianity speech. He’s made quite a few of those now.
Obama then launched a series of verbal assaults on several GOP presidential candidates, including Dr. Ben Carson, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee.
“I’m sure he loves the Constitution — except for Article III,” Obama said in a sarcastic tone, referring to Huckabee. “And maybe the Equal Protection Amendment. And 14th Amendment, generally.”
After thoroughly trashing Christians everywhere and essentially promising that their religious liberty would not be recognized under his rule, he called for the LGBT community to remain vigilant and assured them he would continue to fight for “progress.”
If this isn’t a clear warning sign for American Christians, we don’t know what is.
H/T Breitbart

http://conservativetribune.com/obama-issues-chilling-threat/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=ShareButton&utm_campaign=ESSB

HOW TO HAVE A COMMON LAW TRUST CHEAPLY AND FOR MANY LEGAL USES! FROM ERASMUS OF AMERICA - SEPT. 29, 2015

HOW TO HAVE A COMMON LAW TRUST CHEAPLY AND FOR MANY LEGAL USES! FROM ERASMUS OF AMERICA - SEPT. 29, 2015

Image result for common law trust
One businessman wanted a copy of the common law trust of one of the richest families in America and he stated that he had to pay $20,000 to receive a copy of their family common law trust. Even years ago it was common to pay an attorney with any knowledge how to set up common law trusts legal fees such as a low of $5,000 on up to $20,000 or more to set it up for anyone!  A common law trust besides being used to create a non-incorporated business entity or a legal substitute for a business partnership and other forms of business entities can also be used for such as to create legal entities to pass on family inheritances through without family wills, estate taxes, etc. and some used common law trusts to make their families become some of the richest families in the world through use of these family common law trusts. A common law trust could be used to give a church a legal charter by means other than incorporation, etc. It could be used to create charities with, cultural societies, and legal entities to carry out your wishes but separate from you and you not liable for what it does as a legal entity.
Some time back years ago I picked up the copyright licensing rights to one of these common law trusts prepared by one of the smarter lawyers in America in this field and I am sure that this was not cheap when he used the format I was supplied to create his basic common law trusts for his clients. There is also a listing of court decisions across America that he supplied on rulings upholding the legality and legal rights of common law trusts under law. He showed how to use common law trusts to achieve your legal purposes in life where they can be used. They have tried to tighten up how common law trusts can be used today in tax issues, but they used to be very effective many times to create tax-free legal entities in America for use under federal or state law. Under special angles or factors of law in special situations, I would assume they could still be used for tax-free angles if the involved financial angle is already technically tax-free under law when done properly such as properly handled currency exchanges, transfer of property, family money, stocks, etc. from one source to another, etc.
A point of law to consider. The U.S. Supreme Court stated years ago that it was not illegal to avoid taxes but only to evade taxes. Maybe your common law trust can be legally used to avoid taxes or certain taxes, but not used to evade taxes if required by law. How you operate in life determines how much taxes, if any, you owe in life! The smart protect their assets from personal liabilities, avoid as much taxes as legally they can, and pass on their estate to their heir or heirs without inheritance taxes and without their heir or heirs having to go through a costly and lengthy in time probate court. In other words, common law trusts have been for the wealthy who are smart with how to live well legally under law and not intended for the ordinary citizens of America who are ignorant of their legal rights such as setting up common law trusts for their own selves, families, etc. Common Law Trusts go back to the American Revolution as legal and were used by such as Founding Fathers of America in 1776.
For example, it is reported that Samuel Adams, one of the leaders of the American Revolution, set up a common law trust for a business that was still operating as a business in America over 200 years later! Among other things, it is a legal structure that can be used to raise capital for a business venture by means other than partnership or corporate stock.
The Continental Congress under President John Hancock fighting the American Revolution called upon and encouraged the American people to raise the money to start founding industries in America and stated that the states could not license nor stop raising money for new industries to be founded through such as using common law trusts which was probably the main way the first industries were financed and founded in America.
When the American Revolution was over, America had national industries started which did not exist when the American Revolution began. America started as an agricultural nation and was born as an industrial nation by the time the American Revolution was over! John Hancock, President of the Continental Congress, starting around the time of the beginning of the American Revolution, began the drive in Massachusetts to found textile industries, etc. in America when the the American Revolution was starting to erupt. The history books do not teach on this now, but I found this in the original histories still left us printed at the time of the American Revolution. They judged founding industries in America would create much employment in America and this was the practice of Christianity to help out the poor in America wherever they might be. They stated starting industries in America was the practice of Christianity to make the people prosperous through this instead of poor.
Common Law Trusts are among the legal rights retained by the American people as referred to in the U.S. Bill of Rights which neither federal nor state government could ever legally take away from the American people later on in America. And under federal civil rights laws, even judges state or federal can be potentially punished with lawsuit or imprisonment for trying to use their courts to take away from the American people their U.S. Bill of Rights! As the U.S. Supreme Court ruled, when state or federal personnel and officials try to violate the legal rights of the American people in the U.S. Bill of Rights, they then lose their legal right to immunity from lawsuit and prosecution for what they did criminally under color or pretense of law. At the bottom of this report are listings from search engines showing that common law trusts are used in business across America.
I will briefly offer as a free bonus offer with the Omni Law Loan Program my package of legal material which I previously sold for $495.00. This shows you how to set up a common law trust for yourself and how it is run by you once set up. It has the sample common law trust which you substitute your name, etc. for the sample name, etc. in order to set up your own common law trust for yourself if you want to. This is the format that the attorney supplied who wrote up this sample common law trust for you to use. It has all sorts of court rulings on common law trusts covering basically all the states of America listed in material the attorney supplied as supporting legal documents for a Common Law Trust so you can understand how this type law works for you.
And I supplied some historical material on the Common Law Trust as I was a history major at the university and when in high school apparently rated by national testing as the top history student out of American high schools that year. I won a postgraduate college scholarship in political science off of that testing and while still in high school. I have a 10 page Common Law Trust sample for you to have. You put your name, etc. in the form where an invented name is used to show you what to put in the form as information for your Common Law Trust. You can make a copy or two of the pages and blank out the invented names, etc. and put in your own name, etc. in the form. You have legal notes supplied by the attorney on court rulings on the Common Law Trust. I help by showing the history behind The Common Law Trust as used in America for over 200 years now in American law. The material is written so you should be able to understand it fine yet technically important for you to read.
Years ago when I once previously offered this to the people, I had this collection of Common Law Trust material offered for $175.00 plus state tax if they ordered it within 10 days. After that, this Common Law Trust package of material would cost $495.00 for it. At this time through Oct. 10, 2015, I will send to you this Omni Law Legal Package for free if you put $100.00 or more in my Omni Law Loan Program shown on my national website. Whether I will offer this after Oct. 10, 2015 I have not committed to yet. If I continue it as an offer, you may even have to pay out $500 to get it then one way or another after Oct. 10., 2015. It is all copyrighted and I allow you to use it for your private use and run extra copies for your own use and your family, but not to be reprinted nor shown to others. This is valuable legal property and I retain legal rights to it. You may for yourself use the information in the legal package any way you see fit including copying any or all of the other reports with the format sample of the Common Law Trust in court filings, legal records for your own Common Law Trust, etc. You may use it for whatever legal purposes you need for yourself. If you want, you may use your own attorney to officially write this Common Law Trust up for you, but as most lawyers are not too familiar with Common Law Trusts, he may learn some new law by reading what is in the legal package!
Our website is www.fastboomamericaneconomy.com Our email is fastboomamericaneconomy.com@gmail.com You can put in $100.00 or more in our Omni Law Loan Program and as a note say "For Common Law Info." Or if you can't place an order through our website, our mailing address is NIFI, P.O. Box 1465, Seneca, SC 29679. Make checks, etc. out to NIFI and tell us what the payment is for. The proposed Omni Law is to give the American people the legal right of referendum over the federal government which has gone way out of control and poorly if at all continues to obey the terms of the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Bill of Rights. Once you have the legal right of referendum over Wash., D.C., then we can see that the laws and policies of Wash., D.C. now again obey the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Bill of Rights instead of invalid laws passed or decreed as "acts of pretended legislation" as Thomas Jefferson wrote of invalid British law passed off as valid in summing up the bad government that Great Britain had imposed over the Thirteen Colonies which they found impossible to live under any longer. Full name of the Omni Law is shown on our website to be "The Omnibus Civil Rights Act For America." Once passed, free enterprise skyrockets in America, taxes get reasonable again, and we return to serious freedom and legal rights in America which Wash., D.C. has nearly forgotten what real freedom is supposed to be in America.
Show this report to others! Pass it around! And returning to the roots of the founding of America in 1776, Thomas Jefferson said that "The Bible is the cornerstone of all liberty (in America)." And as both Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin suggested as the motto for the American Revolution should be: "Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!" And Benjamin Franklin so beautifully summed up what the American Revolution was all about, "Where liberty dwells,
Yours for God and Country, Erasmus Of America (Pen name for that American who likes too much the freedom America was founded upon in 1776 to let Obama and other despisers of the founding principles of America in 1776 take away from us freedoms and a great nation to live in for us and our descendants we want to carry on the America that we love and want for the future!)
Business Trust. An unincorporated business organization created by a legal document, a declaration of trust, and used in place of a corporation or partnership for the transaction of various kinds of business with limited liability.

Massachusetts business trust - Wikipedia, the free ...

Wikipedia
A Massachusetts Business Trust (MBT) is a legal trust set up for the purposes of business, but not necessarily one that is operated in the Commonwealth of...

Trust (business) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia
A trust or corporate trust is an American English term for a large business with significant market power. It is often used in a historical sense to refer to monopolies or near-monopolies in the United States during the Second Industrial Revolution in the 19th century and early 20th century.
History -See also -References -Bibliography

What is business trust? definition and meaning

www.businessdictionary.com/definition/business-trust.html
Definition of business trust: Commercial organization managed by appointed trustees (who hold the title to the business' property) for the benefit of one or more...

YABT

Site for young entrepreneurs, purpose of the Trust is to develop business skills in young people in the Americas.

Business Trust Law & Legal Definition

definitions.uslegal.com Legal Definitions Home B
Business trust is a form of business organization which is similar to a corporation, in which investors receive transferable certificates of beneficial interest.

What is a Business Trust? (with pictures) - wiseGEEK

www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-business-trust.htm
A business trust is a legal organization set up to control and manage assets and property. To be considered a business trust, a...

Why Every Business Owner Needs a Trust - LegalZoom

LegalZoom
A living trust can protect your business in the even of your death.

Business Trust - Business | Laws.com

business.laws.com/special-business-forms/business-trust
A business trust is set up when the assets and property of a business corporation are entrusted to an appointed trustee. The trustees will manage the operation...

Business Trust

www.btrust.org.za/
This website provides a summary of the work of the Business Trust along with access to the reports, publications, case studies and research produced by the..

Group Submits Signatures to Repeal California Vaccine Law

Group Submits Signatures to Repeal California Vaccine Law

Gov. Jerry Brown signed SB277 into law earlier this year amid fierce opposition

Group Submits Signatures to Repeal California Vaccine Law
by Juliet Williams | NBC | September 29, 2015

Supporters of an effort to repeal California’s new law requiring mandatory vaccines for schoolchildren faced a Monday deadline to turn in enough signatures to qualify a ballot initiative asking voters to repeal the law.
Watch Video:

The group had until the end of the day to submit the needed 366,000 signatures to county clerks to ask California voters to repeal SB277, which struck the state’s personal belief exemption for immunizations, a move that requires nearly all public schoolchildren to be vaccinated.
Gov. Jerry Brown signed SB277 into law earlier this year amid fierce opposition from some parents’ rights groups who argue the state should not force their children to be vaccinated, saying the science is clear that vaccines “dramatically protect children against a number of infectious and dangerous diseases.”
Election clerks in Los Angeles and Contra Costa counties reported receiving signature petitions Monday, but officials might not know until next week whether supporters have enough signatures to make it to the ballot. County clerks have eight business days to count and report how many signatures they received, which would likely be followed by a more detailed review.
Read more

http://www.infowars.com/group-submits-signatures-to-repeal-california-vaccine-law/

Obama Gave Over 1,500 Terrorists Asylum in US, Documents Reveal

Obama Gave Over 1,500 Terrorists Asylum in US, Documents Reveal

Law waived to allow foreigners who engaged in terrorism "while under duress" into country

Obama Gave Over 1,500 Terrorists Asylum in US, Documents Reveal
by Mikael Thalen | Infowars.com | September 29, 2015

Documents obtained by Judicial Watch reveal that the Obama administration gave as many as 1,519 terrorists asylum in the United States in 2014.
According to the government watchdog, “the administration let 1,519 ‘inadmissible’ foreigners embroiled in terrorism into the U.S. last year because the crimes were committed ‘while under duress.'”
“Before the Obama administration tweaked a federal law last year, these foreign nationals would have been banned from the country for supporting terrorist causes,” Judicial Watch writes. “But under the changes the Secretary of Homeland Security has ‘discretionary authority’ to waive certain grounds of inadmissibility relating to terrorism.”
Data obtained from the DHS and the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service reveals that more than 50 percent of those rewarded residency, most of which whom were linked to the refugee crisis, provided material support to terrorist organizations.
“The others received military-type training from a terrorist organization, voluntarily provided medical care to members of a terrorist group and solicited funds or individuals for membership in a terrorist organization,” Judicial Watch continues. “After a case-by-case review, Obama’s DHS Secretary, Jeh Johnson, determined that the recently admitted terrorists only participated in these activities ‘while under duress.'”
The policy of admitting known terrorists began last year after the Obama administration altered legislation, the Immigration and Nationality Act, designed to keep anyone who may have provided material support to terrorists from stepping on US soil.
“In other words, the federal law rightfully had a zero tolerance for any kind of involvement with terrorist elements,” adds Judicial Watch. “But a joint effort by DHS and the State Department created an ‘Exercise of Authority’ that allows ‘an alien who provided limited material support’ to a terrorist organization to stay in the U.S. if the powers that be in our government believe they pose no threat.”
Judicial Watch also links the revelation to the Obama administration’s secret terrorist “hands off” list, uncovered in DHS emails last year by a U.S. senator, which show the administration had allowed a suspected Muslim Brotherhood member to openly travel within the US.
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mt.examiner
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MikaelThalen 
Email: Mikael@infowars.com (PGP Key)
OTR: Mikaelthalen@dukgo.com

http://www.infowars.com/obama-gave-over-1500-terrorists-asylum-in-us-documents-reveal/
 

Public Service Commission staff suggests surcharge for American Water

Public Service Commission staff suggests surcharge for American Water

By Andrew Brown, Business Reporter
Monday, September 28, 2015

As public hearings get set to begin for West Virginia American Water’s pending rate increase, various groups have asked the state Public Service Commission for smaller increases and alternative funding options.
Last Friday, the PSC staff, the PSC’s Consumer Advocate Division, Advocates for a Safe Water System and several local government agencies filed testimony in response to the company’s request for a 28 percent rate increase that would increase the average residential customers bill by more than $11 per month, or $139 per year.
Throughout the testimony, each group discussed American Water’s replacement of water mains and several offered up alternative rate calculations for the company, which has come under pressure following the chemical contamination of people’s drinking water in January 2014.
In response to the company’s request for $35.4 million more in revenue annually, the Consumer Advocate Division suggested that the Public Service Commission approve an increase of no more than $1.8 million annually.
In comparison, the PSC staff recommended an increase of $12.1 million — 9.68 percent — and suggested that the commissioners approve a new rate mechanism that would allow American Water to pay for water main replacements through a separate surcharge assessed to customers.
In advocating for that surcharge, Terry Eads testified that the current rate structure may not encourage the company’s shareholders to invest the adequate amount of money into the water system, which documents show is aging quicker than the company can replace lines.
According to PSC documents, American Water’s system continues to lose around 26.9 percent of the water it treats before it gets to customers, nearly two times the 15 percent standard that the PSC set. Documents have also shown that it would take nearly 384 years to replace all of the mains in its water system.
And in response to questioning, American Water officials have said the requested $35.4 million rate request was “not expected to significantly reduce” that life cycle.
Laura Jordan, spokeswoman for West Virginia American Water, said that the company would submit follow-up testimony by Oct. 15.
In his testimony, Eads suggested the need for pipeline replacement was the reason the PSC staff was recommending American Water be allowed to assess a surcharge that will be put towards upgrading the company’s system.
“While public opinion of this rate proceeding indicates customer’s concerns with increasing rates, it also indicates concern with increasing incidents of water leaks and main breaks,” Eads testified. “These service-related issues impact the quality and reliability of water service which is critically important to customers.”
If approved by the commission, the proposed surcharge would allow American Water to submit a comprehensive plan that outlines several years of main replacements and trues up the amount of money received by customers every year.
According to Eads, the plan was based on other surcharges that have been approved by the PSC and the West Virginia Legislature recently for things like natural gas pipeline replacements and tree trimming along electric power lines.
While the CAD and Advocates for a Safe Water System are still reviewing the staff’s proposal and will have time to respond, officials with those two groups have suggested that a surcharge could be something worthy of consideration.
“It’s clear to everyone that the water company has very serious infrastructure issues and we need to find a way to address them,” said Jackie Roberts, the CAD director.
In other PSC cases dealing with surcharges assessed by electric and gas utilities, Roberts and the CAD have come down in opposition to those separate rate cases. Roberts said she and the CAD staff would be reviewing the surcharge proposal and would submit a response in the next two weeks.
Cathy Kunkel, a member of the Advocates for a Safe Water System’s steering committee, said she saw the surcharge as fitting with her groups effort to bring recognition to the way American Water invests money in its system.
“It could be a good thing in recognizing the company is falling behind in main replacement,” Kunkel said, adding that a surcharge specifically for main replacement could help prioritize spending on infrastructure replacement. “It’s certainly worth considering.”
In its testimony, the Advocates for a Safe Water System requested that the PSC perform a management audit that focuses on investigating the company’s priorities in capital investment projects.
While the citizen group, which was established after the Freedom Industries spill in 2014, has pushed for a public takeover of the water system, Kunkel said they are also pushing for greater commission oversight of how American Water decides where to invest. She said several parties in the ongoing rate case have raised that exact issue.
“It is going to be an important part of what the commission is going to have to figure out,” she said.
Reach Andrew Brown at andrew.brown@wvgazette.com, 304-348-4814, or follow @Andy_Ed_Brown on Twitter.

http://www.wvgazettemail.com/article/20150928/GZ01/150929478/1419

Capitalising On Human Suffering

Capitalising On Human Suffering

Martin Shkreli
Martin Shkreli, the CEO of a large pharmaceutical company that recently acquired the rights to a drug used by HIV and cancer patients, has brought the shocking callousness of unchecked capitalism into the spotlight.
Last month, Turing Pharmaceuticals bought the rights to manufacture and sell Daraprim in the United States. Daraprim is used to treat toxoplasmosis, a parasitic and life-threatening disease that affects people with compromised immune systems.
Despite being classified as an essential medicine which should be affordable to the general population by the World Health Organisation (1), Turning Pharmaceuticals has raised the price of Daraprim extortionately, from $13 per 75mg pill to a massive $750 per pill. Each 75mg pill costs only $1 to produce. It is a single source pharmaceutical product (2), which means Turing Pharmaceuticals is the only company in America that has the legal right to produce and sell this potentially life-saving drug. Patients can’t take their business elsewhere.
Let’s really put that into perspective. For each Daraprim pill sold, Turing Pharmaceuticals will make a $749 profit. Around 2,000(3) Americans use the drug every year, with the average treatment course lasting around three weeks, at a dosage of 75mg per day (4). That means Turing Pharmaceuticals stand to make a profit of $27,258,000 from Daraprim sales every year, while the average American earns just $27,000 a year, barely enough to cover the cost of a three-week course of treatment.
Though most Americans who require treatment for Toxoplasmosis will be covered by their health insurance, some won’t, and insurance companies (too motivated by profit), will be forced to raise insurance premiums and/or make their policies stricter so as to avoid paying out huge sums to people in genuine need.
While most people are shocked and disgusted by Martin Shkreli’s brutal, cold, and calculated effort to make obscene profits off the backs of other people’s misfortune, the business of capitalising from human suffering extends far beyond this story.

Weapons
Another example of big business profiteering from human suffering has been brought to public attention recently through a campaign by Amnesty International. Until their recent advertising campaign, few people were aware that every two years a huge defence and security equipment exhibition called the Defence Security and Equipment International (5) is held in London Docklands. Essentially, this is a trade show where arms dealers can display the latest technology in weaponry to military representatives, some from countries renowned for human rights abuses such as Saudi Arabia. Amnesty International, who have attended the fair a number of times, have reported that illegal torture equipment and weapons such as cluster bombs, leg irons, and electric shock batons have been advertised at the event (6). The trade show, which hosted 1,500 exhibitions in 2013, is owned by Clarion Events (7), a company that organises numerous such trade shows, and reportedly turns over £200 million (8) every year. While arms companies profit from torture and (often illegal) wars, Clarion Events profits from introducing the arms dealers to totalitarian regimes at fairs like DSEI.

War
Profiteering from war might start with arms dealers, but that is by no means where it ends. One hundred and thirty-eight billion dollars (9) of US taxpayers’ money was spent on securing contracts with private companies during the 2003 Iraq war, for services such as security, feeding troops, and replacing infrastructure that had been destroyed during the US-led coalition invasion.
Private mercenaries played a huge role in the war in Iraq, with companies such as the infamous Blackwater reaping large monetary rewards for providing armed “security personnel”. In August 2008 alone, there were 7,121 armed “private security contractors” deployed in Iraq. (10)
The American company Halliburton was the biggest contract winner, securing $39.5 billion (11) from the US government in exchange for their services during the invasion and subsequent occupation. This included a $7 billion (12) deal for rebuilding Iraq’s oil infrastructure, a contract that would have given Iraq’s economy a huge boost had it been awarded to an Iraqi company or the state, as opposed to a multi-billion dollar US corporation.
What is perhaps most disturbing about these contracts, is that many of them were what is known as “cost-plus” (13). When a company is awarded a cost-plus contract, as well as having all their expenses covered, they are guaranteed to be paid a certain amount on top, in order to ensure that they make a substantial profit. Such contracts provide little incentive for these private companies to minimise costs. In fact, the opposite is true; they provide an incentive for contractors to spend more than necessary, as every extra dollar spent means extra profit.
It seems war is a profitable business. Foreign corporations literally made billions of dollars from the deaths of 224,000 people (14), 165,000 of those being Iraqi civilians.

Incarceration
War is not the only atrocity private companies are profiting from. Private prisons are proving to be another lucrative business.
The US has 5% of the world’s population, but more than 20% of the world’s prisoners (15). It has more prisoners than China, Russia, and Iran. Despite decreasing crime rates, the prison population has grown by 721% since the 1980’s, with over 500 per 100,000 people being incarcerated in 2010 (16). The adoption of draconian “tough-on-crime” laws by the US government in the 1980s (17), such as mandatory minimum sentencing for minor drug-related offences, has been a large contributing factor to the dramatic increase in incarceration rates, with the majority of inmates serving long sentences for non-violent offences.
The private prison industry has been reaping huge rewards from the mass incarceration of US citizens that began in the 1980s, when the complete management of entire prisons began to be handed over to private corporations. Corrections Corporations of America, the biggest private corrections company in the US, was the first private company to be awarded a contract that covered the complete operation of an American jail in 1984. Now CCA manages more than 65 prisons across 19 states, and in 2015, the company’s revenue was more than $1.7 billion (18).
The privatisation of prisons isn’t limited to the United States. In 1992, under John Major’s Conservative government, Wolds Prison was opened as the first privately managed prison in the UK. Under the government’s Private Finance Initiative, 25-year contracts were awarded to private companies for the construction and management of new prisons. Of 150 prisons in the UK, 14 are managed by three private companies, G4S, Sodexo, and Serco (19), and it is estimated that these companies make a 7% return on their investment (20). Privatisation doesn’t seem to lead to efficiency either; in 2013, the Ministry of Justice (21) awarded only one private prison their highest performance rating, while two were awarded the lowest rating and another two the second lowest rating.
These private prison corporations are profiting from people’s suffering. Many people in prison are addicts serving sentences for drug-related crimes, and a large number of those incarcerated in the US have mental health problems and a history of being abused. In 2012, there were an estimated 356,268 people (22) with severe mental health problems locked up in US jails.
Often such problems are only exasperated by a punitive justice system that makes criminals out of vulnerable people. Following release and supposed rehabilitation, ex-convicts struggle to find employment because of their criminal records. In the US, ex –convicts lose their right to vote and are not entitled to state benefits, housing, food stamps, or student loans. This is a recipe for re-offending. Imprisonment not only removes vulnerable people from society, it makes their reintegration following incarceration very challenging.
The rise in the business of profiting from human suffering is a reprehensible result of a society moving away from state ownership to an increasingly privatised money making machine that is the globalised economy. The hands of private businesses are reaching into the darkest corners of our world, grabbing at every possible opportunity to make a profit. But making money from disease, war, and crime is not only immoral; basic economics shows that a growing market is a profitable one. For every sick person, every war, and every crime, there is money to be made, so there is a strong motive for businesses with interests in these “industries” to want the rates of these horrors to proliferate. We will never eradicate disease, achieve world peace, or eliminate crime while corporations are making billions from humanity’s biggest crises.

What can we do?
In a world where corporations are king, we as individuals can feel powerless, believing there is nothing we can do to prevent these opportunists from capitalising on other people’s pain. But small actions can have a big influence. Public outrage and media backlash forced Martin Shkreli to backtrack on his original price hike, though he has not yet confirmed to what extent he will lower the price of Daraprim. As for preventing big business from continuing to profit from war and incarceration, the first step is raising public awareness. The facts I outlined in this article are enough to make anyone angry and indignant, but they rarely make front-page headlines. The next step is to put pressure on our governments and on corporations to stop the modern-day business of war and incarceration. To raise awareness and to make a change, we cannot work alone. Like-minded people must come together, organise, and collectivise in order to find a solution. Change starts with the people, not a person.

Links

(1)http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/essentialmedicines/en/
(2)http://www.pharmacytimes.com/contributor/monica-v-golik-mahoney-pharmd-bcps-aq-id/2015/07/new-pyrimethamine-dispensing-program-what-pharmacists-should-know
(3)http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-09-21/clinton-s-tweet-on-high-drug-prices-sends-biotech-stocks-down
(4)http://www.drugs.com/dosage/daraprim.html
(5)http://www.dsei.co.uk/
(6)https://www.amnesty.org.uk/actions/torture-equipment-traded-doorstep-london-dsei-arms-fair
(7)http://www.clarionevents.com/
(8)http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/business/Companies/article1461636.ece
(9)http://www.ibtimes.com/winner-most-iraq-war-contracts-kbr-395-billion-decade-1135905
(10)http://www.acq.osd.mil/log/PS/archvd_CENTCOM_reports.html
(11) (12) http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/about_hal/oilinfra.html
(13) http://www.salon.com/2006/09/28/btm_81/
(14) https://www.iraqbodycount.org/
(15) https://www.aclu.org/prison-crisis
(16&17)http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/related_material/2014_US_Nation_Behind_Bars_0.pdf
(18)http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1070985/000119312515061839/d853180d10k.htm
(19)https://www.justice.gov.uk/about/hmps/contracted-out
(20)http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/nov/08/prison-privatisation-g4s-wolds
(21)https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/225226/prison-annual-per-ratings-12-13.pdf
(22)http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/4/8/mental-illness-prison.html

Holly Walter is an English teacher and aspiring writer with a passion for travel and international politics. Following completion of a Bachelor’s degree in Psychology and a Master’s degree in Evolution and Human Behaviour, Holly moved from the UK to Japan, where she lived for a year before moving again to the Costa Blanca, Spain. Living abroad forced her to be more open-minded and to take a different perspective when looking at the world; her ambition is to encourage others to do the same through her writing. Holly’s website is hollywalter.weebly.com, where you will also find her blog. You can also follow her on Twitter (hollywalter0420).