Friday, February 26, 2016

Build your immune system - Dr Mount


BUILD YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM
DR. WILLIAM MOUNT




WE STAND: AND OPEN LETTER TO THE FBI AGENTS THAT KILLED LAVOY FINICUM IN OREGON.....


 
 
We Stand: An Open Letter To The Three FBI Agents That Killed LaVoy Finicum In Oregon.....This One Needs To Go Viral...
 
Posted By: Watchman
Date: Friday, 26-Feb-2016 16:56:43

I’ve thought about you. All three of you, with your guns pointed at LaVoy Finicum. The video still haunts me.
I would have been the first one to give you the benefit of the doubt. I was raised around law enforcement. I know good men in law enforcement. But that changed for me, as it did thousands of Americans, with the events that unfurled in Oregon as I felt utterly stunned at what I viewed in that video.
I watched the grainy version of the video that the FBI administration released of LaVoy Finicums death, even though I knew that with our technology today, they have better, more clear footage and footage with audio from this event. But you will not release that, it is too incriminating for the FBI. They did this with purpose to deceive the public and that video would have revealed to the world your actions that day . This footage you did release, left people arguing about what they were seeing in the blurry video rather than to bring their attention to the way that three FBI agents ambushed and murdered an innocent, non-violent rancher with no criminal history. A man with a large family. A good man. A man who never threatened you.
The FBI had clearly set this up in advance with stops prepared and dozens of agents ready to end the protest because four weeks of a land rights issues protest was all the patience they could muster. The protesters had left the ranch many times before and on this day we’re headed for a meeting to inform ranchers of their rights. You knew that. You stopped the two cars and started shooting at LaVoy’s truck full of passengers- unprovoked. They never brandished a weapon against you.
Finicum told you he was driving to the Sheriffs office for protection from you. The only place he felt safe. You fired on his vehicle. You could have just followed him if you had ever intended to have a peaceful outcome. But that was never your intention. Finicum knew why the local law enforcement wasn’t invited to this event- why the local Sheriff was intentionally kept at bay- Finicum feared what you would do to him with no local oversight. The Sheriff of Grant County, just over the county line where you ambushed him, valued Constitutional rights and Finicum knew the Sheriff would never approve of an ambush on the highway and and execution of a protester.
A tax-paying citizen who loved America could not trust you and fled for his life because he knew you could murder him and get away with it. Let that sink in.
When Finicum got out of his vehicle with his hands up, within seconds you gathered around him and shot him in the back.
You shot him him in the back.
Who would carry out such a cowardly deed? Who would follow orders to shoot a rancher with his hands up and shoot him in the back seconds after getting out of his vehicle? The three of you would do this. What were you thinking? How do you reconcile this in your head and in your heart?
No talking? Not one attempt at a peaceful negotiation? At the refuge all he did was talk to you, never threatened you. His hands were UP. Did your conscience allow you to shoot him without anyreservation? After his lifeless body dropped into the snow, you cared so little for this fellow citizen that you walked around his body and didn’t check for a pulse for 15 minutes? Why? Because of your guilt or because you had such little regard for him or for human life in general? Both of those answers are equally terrifying to me.
Moments later you shot rounds of ammunition into Finicum’s truck with scared women inside screaming for help- trying to surrender. You threw gas cans inside the vehicle. Is this how you do it now? Are you sincerely okay with this? Look at what you have become. By a miracle they survived.
Before you hunted him down and silenced him like wild game, Finicum carried out two heroic acts. As he turned the blind corner on the highway, he almost ran into your barricade head on, as vehicles and men stood standing in the middle of the highway at your “stop”. He veered to the left on the snowbank to avoid hitting you. To preserve your lives. He then got out of the vehicle with his hands up to divert your attention from his truck with passengers inside, so you would stop firing upon them. To preserve their lives. This is the man you surrounded and killed within seconds. You killed a hero.
I wonder what has happened to my America where you could easily tell the good guys from the bad guys. Are you mercenaries now? Carrying out executions on demand? Have you realized yet that you did the bidding of a government that is seeking to violate the property rights and steal the land of your fellow citizens? Do you realize that you are a citizen and that these ranchers were standing up for YOUR rights, too? Or have you not realized this.
Most Americans won’t take the time to do the research to find out that you shot him in the back before he ever reached for his stomach – the area where you shot him. And your bosses instructed the media to tell everyone he reached for a gun to justify this cowardly act of murder on a fellow citizen. What a pathetic cover-up for your actions that day.
I’m asking all three of you who carried out the execution of Finicum, to RESIGN.
Resign, because I have to know that you will never be allowed to act with force again. I have to know that men like you would not be allowed to continue on as FBI agents. If you are rewarded for this dastardly act, I will lose all faith in our justice system.
We need men with a conscience and a soul in law enforcement.
We need good men who are there to protect the citizens rights. Your fellow men.
You took an oath to defend the Constitution. Did you understand this oath when you excitedly repeated its words to get your badge? It wasn’t a promise. It was an oath. An oath to protect and to serve- us. LaVoy was one of US.
Are you going to protect us or are you going to protect orders? Even if those orders compel you to disregard someone’s Constitutional rights in the most brazen and corrupt and evil way? Was this you “just doing your job”, so that you could end their protest?
Millions of people have died as a result of those ” just doing their job”. Under Hitler. Under Stalin. Is this who you have become? Shooting someone with their hands up because you were told to?
You can no longer hide behind the lie that you felt threatened enough to shoot him dead. With a dozen or more of you ready to attack him, the only one that felt threatened was Finicum, I assure you. You murdered an innocent man. The salt of the earth. A man who would have stood up for you and who would have respected you. A man who would have shaken your hand and talked to about his love for America. You killed him.
Let me ask you this. In all of your years in the FBI, how many ranchers have ever threatened you or have drawn weapons on you? I’m guessing the thugs you deal with everyday do not include ranchers and farmers.
How many ranchers over the years have left their working farms, to protest over the stealing of another ranchers land and imprisonment? I’m guessing probably none.
Here’s the difficult question. After decades of government abuse to rancher’s property rights, how many ranchers have YOU defended, or aided, or stood for- because you did take an oath to defend the Constitutional rights of those in your care. I am going to guess that you have never stood for any of these men against the abuse of the government. You have become pawns. You are protecting the governments special interests, not the people’s.
Resign, so I can sleep at night with some of my faith in America restored.
Resign, so I can tell my kids to respect the FBI.
Resign, because I need to know there are not monsters out there with guns and badges that will do anything they are told to do, like killing innocent Americans, because we could be next.
Resign.
WHOEVER WROTE THIS DID A DISSERVICE BY NOT POSTING THAT ALL OR MOST OF THESE MERCS WITH THE FBI AND BLM ARE ALL FRENCH MERCS...  IT IS TIME TO LIGHT THESE BASTARDS UP.... THEY ARE LAUGHING IN THE WRITERS FACE.... HANG-UM-HIGH!!

You may be a fellow citizen, but you are not my fellow American.
http://foxnews1450.com/2016/02/25/an-open-letter-to-the-three-fbi-agents-that-killed-lavoy-finicum-in-oregon/

BIDEN TO MEXICO: "Only the violent crazy outcasts of American society...


Feb 26 2016

BIDEN TO MEXICO: "Only the violent crazy outcasts of American society think there is an immigrant problem."

Biden was on Mexican television last night, and he made my gut churn. It was like a hypnotizing horror show, I could not turn it off. And during that show, I learned that:
Americans who think there is an immigration problem are extremely fringe people who have little to no education, WITHOUT EXCEPTION.
Trump is an irresponsible psychopath who is dangerous, likely to be a murderer, and probably escaped from Bellview to subsequently receive a new identity, from which he terrorizes much of the civilized world.
All Americans who should not be in prison love the immigrants and welcome them with open arms. Absolutely every American who is not both insane and illiterate wants 5 times as many illegal immigrants, and also wants to hand them everything, so they do not even need to work when they get to the U.S.
Biden kept repeating over and over again these exact lines: "The American people love Mexicans, except for an extremely dangerous radical fringe" "The American people love Mexicans and Mexico, exept for an extremely dangerous tiny minority" "The ONLY Americans who do not love Mexicans are dangerous and illiterate"
It went on and on and on, and I was absolutely blown away. Biden actually scared me last night, because he said these things in a way which implied that they would soon be enforced as law. And the magnitude of the lie - I do not even need to mention that. The attitude, where "if you do not like losing your job to an illegal, you are violent and illiterate" is exactly the type of attitude you get from enemy soldiers who are ripping your society apart for the final takedown, "If you disagree you are dangerous." 
Yes I'd say, only to an enemy that might be afraid of being shot for destroying the nation.
Biden clearly displayed the depths to which the communist/leftist faction of America has already sunk to. They actually have the audacity to marginalize main street America as dangerous, illiterate, and violent. And that is who the prison camps would obviously be for, RIGHT?

Dave Hodges: This is a can’t miss interview. Make it VIRAL - Americans NEED TO KNOW!


CSS Offical-New-Logo2  The Coming Trump Assassination and the Scalia Murder - Doug Hagmann Interviews Dave Hodges

Will a Second Military Coup Finally Unseat Obama?


CSS Offical-New-Logo2Will a Second Military Coup Finally Unseat Obama?







Dave Hodges
Feb 24 2016
 
In the world of an "Et tu Brute" coup against the established political leadership, there are two separate and distinct kinds of coup.

First, there is the coup of opportunity. The coup of opportunity occurs, as luck would have it, when circumstances present an opportunity for the military to force a change in leadership.

The second kind of coup involves a general discontent among military leadership along with allies within the 'government', and this kind of coup almost always has the backing of the majority of the citizenry.

A Coup of Opportunity


A distinct coup of opportunity took place during the establishment’s “stand down” position while Ambassador Stevens and his security fought for their lives at Benghazi. The attack on Benghazi took place at a time when Obama was changing military commanders faster than most people change their socks. Under Obama, nobody in the military could have felt secure in their positions. The military had come to see how they had been sold out by Obama and American military lives were at risk. For that matter, the entire country was at risk under Obama’s leadership.

As a prelude to the attack on Benghazi, Stevens had been trafficking in guns, drugs and children on behalf of the CIA for the express purpose of raising funds, Iran-Contra style, for Middle East Terrorist groups. These facts were leaking out and 2012, was an election year and the leak had to be plugged.

Stevens knew he was in danger as his requests for a stronger body guard contingent went ignored by his boss at the time, Hillary Clinton. I subsequently learned that Stevens reached out to the military command structure in the area and asked for help in the event he was attacked. The traditional American military was all too happy to help because Stevens could have brought down the Obama administration in a post-rescue scenario as he would have sung like a canary as to the kinds of criminal activities that the administration was engaged in.

The two military who were going to rescue Stevens and change the course of military history were AFRICOM’s commanding officer, General Carter Ham, and Carrier task force commander, Admiral Charles M. Gayouette.

The positions held by Hamm and Gayouette are so powerful and so sensitive, their replacements required approval from the Senate.  Both leaders were jointly attempting to rescue Ambassador Stevens and his bodyguards, despite being told to stand down by Defense Secretary, Leon Panetta. There is now proof that Obama was warned in advance of the coming attack in which Stevens begged for more protection and his impassioned plea was denied by Clinton.

As Stevens was begging for help after the attack had begun, General Hamm had activated a special forces team within minutes of learning that the embassy, which was really a CIA safe house, was under attack. When General Ham received his “stand down” orders from Obama, he made plans to go ahead with the rescue and was arrested within minutes of contravening he order by his second in command, General Rodriquez, of the CIA.

Admiral Gayouette, the commander of Carrier Strike Group Three, was preparing to provide intelligence and air cover for General Hamm’s rescue team in violation of his standing orders and he was promptly relieved of command for “allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment.                                         


General Ham had been in command of the initial 2011 US-NATO military intervention in Libya and we can, in part, read from US military insider accounts of this growing internal conflict between the White House and US Military leaders.  It is abundantly clear that had Obama been concerned for saving the lives of the four murdered Americans, American forces could have stopped the mortar fire that eventually killed Ambassador Stevens. However, Panetta and Obama blocked any rescue attempt. In legal parlance, Obama, Panetta and Clinton were, at minimum, accomplices to murder.

I was given this information in September of 2012 and told to publish these accounts. I hesitated for a couple of weeks because I did not feel that I had enough supporting information. I was repeatedly told to throw caution to the wind and publish this story. I was further told that I would be vindicated when the inevitable Congressional investigation would take place. This, indeed, ended up being the case.

As I look back on the Benghazi days, it is clear that even though the coup failed to produce its final and desired result, a message had been sent to and among key military leaders that there was a military contingent that was not going to capitulate to the illegal alien occupying 1600 Pennsylvania Boulevard.

The Benghazi affair was a failed coup of opportunity.

 A Planned Military Coup 
 


A planned coup, as opposed to a coup of opportunity, requires elaborate and secret planning.  The element of surprise is essential in this type of coup.

The 1960’s movie, The Seven Days in May, starring Burt Lancaster and Kirk Douglas captured many of these elements.  The one essential element that was missing from the aforementioned movie was that every successful coup of this type requires the eventual support of the people. The coup of opportunity at Benghazi required no such public approval. The scandal, as revealed by Stevens, would have produced the desired political change.

In the aftermath of Benghazi, and out of ignorance, I asked my insider source if there was going to be a coup any time soon, as I lamented how close the country came to ridding itself of its biggest threat. I was told in unequivocal terms that the dumbed down status of the Americans prevented any such planned coup from transpiring and that another coup of opportunity would have to present itself before there could be another attempt.

Another Coup of Opportunity


From both the circumstantial evidence and recent events, there may very well be another coup of opportunity.

It is being widely reported that U.S. General Joseph Dunford ordered the 'President' to steer clear of Scalia’s funeral following a conversation that Dunford had with Russian Colonel General Bondarev in which he was asked why Obama had attended a secret meeting with Scalia shortly before his death and had wondered out loud why Scalia did not have an autopsy. This information has been widely circulated and surprisingly, it is not getting the traction that it should be getting.

Scalia, as the leader of the conservative element of the Supreme Court, was Obama’s biggest obstacle with regard to Obama fulfilling his prime directive as 'President', namely to install a rigid cap and trade system which would permanently destroy the economic backbone of the country.

It has also been determined that Scalia had a secret meeting that has leaked out with Obama shortly before his death but after the Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, struck down Obama’s key Climate Change initiatives. I am not privy to what Obama told Scalia, but I think it is safe to say they were not booking tee times on the golf course.

The feud between Obama and Scalia led to the following statements made by Scalia about the possibility of Obama taking retribution against Scalia. In 2012, in a Fox news interview, Scalia publicly refuted the notion that Obama would retaliate against him for his rulings which ran in the face of the Obama administration.

Justice Scalia
What can Obama do to me?


Published on Feb 18, 2016
In July 2012, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was interviewed by Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday. After reviewing a clip of Obama saying he felt confident the Supreme Court would not overturn the Affordable Health Act legislation, Wallace asked, “Justice, what did you think of that?" Scalia was also asked if he felt pressured by the administration to vote a certain way on Obamacare after the president publicly called the court out during an April press conference.

This was a very telling interview and one can see how Scalia totally underestimated Obama’s potential for retribution. Add to these facts the information that Scalia was was found with a pillow case on his face is mind- boggling. This was a message killing. However, as I have been told, the message to all is that nobody is safe from the despot-in-chief and subsequently, some feel they have little to lose with regard to acting against this 'President'.

A Constitutional Crisis Could Force Obama Out Of White House


In the recent interview with Trunews, retired U.S. Air Force Lt. General Thomas McInerney and Retired U.S. Army General Paul Vallely talked seriously about the possibility of a “Constitutional crisis” that could occur at the hands of President Barack Obama. This was the proverbial “pillow case” over Obama’s face. It is not a physical threat, but it certainly is a political threat.

“According to the report General Dunford lashed out at Bondarev claiming “of course the bastard [Obama] murdered him“.

 Generals: Constitutional Crisis 
Could Force Military To Remove Obama

Conclusion

 

My source has told me that Obama will not take the fall for the assassination of Scalia, as he was too well insulated. However, as Commander-In-Chief, Obama has a fiduciary duty to protect the American people from foreign and domestic enemies. The failure to do could result in a potential reality if Obama refuses to protect the American people from the threat of ISIS and other known terror groups.

To date, Obama has refused to even acknowledge muslim extremism as a threat. And Obama has appointed several members to his administration who have active ties to the terrorist group known as the Muslim Brotherhood. This cannot be setting well with the military as we have troops fighting and dying in Afghanistan against these same types of people.

Don’t make the mistake of thinking that Obama does not have a contingency plan.  He does. The multitude of foreign troops on our soil is a presidential insurance policy. Further, UWEX 16, the ongoing civil war drill going on in Texas speaks to what Obama is expecting to come his way.

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2016/02/24/will-a-second-military-coup-finally-unseat-obama/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=will-a-second-military-coup-finally-unseat-obama

Why is the Government Building Mental Hospitals In Remote Locations?


Why is the Government Building Mental Hospitals In Remote Locations?



This is freaky........

Why is the government building massive amounts of mental hospitals in REMOTE locations?

What does this have to do with Jade Helm 16 (i.e. UWEX 16)? How do our abandoned veterans figure into this covert plot?

Will Donald Trump be assassinated now that he is clearly the front runner?

What are the odds? How will it be done?

Will a patsy be recruited to carry out the deed?

How is Trump like Robert Kennedy in 1968?

Is the 'government', as Jesse Ventura once asserted, carrying out super soldier experiments with human/animal hybirds?

This is beyond belief.

These are the topics of Dave Hodges’ interview with popular talk show host Josh Coy.

To listen, click here.


http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2016/02/22/why-is-the-government-building-mental-hospitals-in-remote-locations/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=why-is-the-government-building-mental-hospitals-in-remote-locations

Chernobyl On The Hudson - a disaster in the making


Chernobyl On The Hudson

Alex Jones
Feb 23, 2016
 
It has been nicknamed Chernobyl on the Hudson. Lying just 34 miles north of New York City’s Central Park, the Indian Point Energy Center has been leaking the radioactive material known as tritium into the groundwater. 

On February 6, 2016 New York Governor Andrew Cuomo finally alerted the public as to the potential catastrophe. Better late than never? Potential nuclear disasters occurring at the Indian Point Energy Center now managed by the Louisiana based Entergy Corporation have been ongoing since 1973.

Obviously, Indian Point could potentially be a repeat of the level 7 Fukushima Daiichi disaster if a nuclear meltdown occurs due to a hurricane or other natural event leading to equipment failures. However, a similar disaster would require the evacuation of 5.6 million people and render Manhattan a no go zone for decades.

In 2004, a study by the Union of Concerned Scientists estimated as many as 44,000 near-term deaths from acute radiation syndrome and as many as 518,000 long-term cancer deaths could occur in people within 50 miles of Indian Point in the event of a severe accident. Potential disaster models reveal the Indian Point plume could reach Chernobyl mass event levels nine times the radiation released at Fukushima.

Indian Point is just one of at least five damaged nuclear power plants in the United States. They are obviously targets for terrorists. Just one more reason why we need our borders closed to Obama’s unconstitutional Executive Order on Immigration.


Chernobyl On The Hudson

 

IRAQ NEW 50,000-DINAR NOTE (356) CONFIRMED



 
Just sharing with those who are interested.... 
 
Jan 01, 2016 11:16 AM Category: Middle East
According to an Arabic press release dated 11 November 2015 (English translation here), the Central Bank of Iraq introduced the following 50,000-dinar note.

Iraq_CBI_50000_dinars_2015.00.00_B356a_PNL_1_1270015_f

Iraq_CBI_50000_dinars_2015.00.00_B356a_PNL_1_1270015_r
B356 (PNL): 50,000 dinars (US$42)
Brown, green, yellow, and blue. Front: Assyrian jar as blue-to-green SPARK patch; water wheel on the Euphrates river; palm trees; flying birds; Gali Ali Beg waterfall in Kurdistan; Assyrian palm tree as registration device. Back: Assyrian palm tree; fishermen poling canoes through marshes with flying ducks, water buffalos, reed house; outline map of Iraq showing Euphrates and Tigris rivers; palm trees. varifeye thread with spiral minaret, Malwiya Tower, at the Great Mosque of Samarra. 4-mm wide purple-to-green RollingStar Cube windowed security thread with demetalized Arabic text (The Central Bank of Iraq). Watermark: Horse head and electrotype 50000. Printer: (G&D). 156 x 65 mm.
a. Ù¢Ù Ù¡Ù¥ - Ù¡Ù¤Ù£Ù¦ (2015/AH1436). Signature 18. Prefix Ù¡/Ù¨. Intro: 11.11.2015.

Scalia’s Supreme Court seat

Surprise: Obama vetting GOP Gov. Brian Sandoval for Scalia’s Supreme Court seat


4:01 pm on February 24, 2016
Allahpundit
 
 
Gotta give credit where it’s due. Obama and his pal Harry know how to troll Republicans.
Brian Sandoval, the centrist Republican governor of Nevada, is being vetted by the White House for a possible nomination to the Supreme Court, according to two people familiar with the process.
Sandoval is increasingly viewed by some key Democrats as perhaps the only nominee President Obama could select who would be able to break a Republican blockade in the Senate…
Sandoval met Monday with Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid, a fellow Nevadan with whom he enjoys cordial relations.
A person familiar with the conversation said that while Sandoval told Reid he had not made a final decision on whether he would accept a Supreme Court nomination, he would allow the vetting process to move forward. Another person in Nevada familiar with the process confirmed that the process is underway.
Sandoval is pro-choice, expanded Medicaid, and oversaw Nevada’s construction of its own ObamaCare exchange (after the first attempt went sideways). He’s as “friendly” to Democrats as a modern Republican gets.Even so, I’m trying to imagine the reaction on the right if a Supreme Court vacancy opened up and a Republican president decided to bypass scores of conservative justices to nominate a center-left Democrat. And not just any center-left Democrat but someone who’s arguably underqualified: Sandoval spent a few years as attorney general of Nevada and then a handful more as a federal district judge, but most SCOTUS nominees have extensive appellate experience. Maybe Obama could sell this to the left on grounds that, with a Republican majority in the Senate vowing they’ll obstruct anyone he puts forward, a centrist Republican nominee is the best they can hope for. I doubt the right would go for that if the tables were turned, though; they’d want a Republican president to name a mainstream conservative and then fight tooth and nail to break the Senate’s will.
Maybe Obama could convince liberals that naming Sandoval would be worth it for the lulz. McConnell and Grassley would start to sweat as the White House proclaimed that the GOP is so intractable they’d actually block a member of their own party from the High Court out of personal pique towards Obama. Dean Heller, the Republican senator from Nevada, would likely cave immediately and call for McConnell to confirm Sandoval. The usual suspects, like Kirk, Collins, McCain, and Graham, would crumble too and join him. Soon you’d have open warfare within the GOP over whether to at least give Sandoval a Judiciary Committee hearing, and once the hearing was held there’d be pressure for a vote, and once that vote was held there’d be pressure for a floor vote. Like I say, Obama and Reid know how to troll. Kicking Sandoval onto the Supreme Court would also remove a major political stumbling block for Democrats in Nevada. Sandoval has been touted as an eventual Senate candidate; in the post-Trump GOP, with centrism newly respectable on the right again, it’s not nutty to think he’d have a half-serious eleventh-hour conversion on abortion down the road and run for president. Putting him on the Court, where he’ll be a reliable vote for Roe, would extract him from the political arena in his home state and beyond for the rest of his life. And Sandoval seems open to the opportunity:
“It would be a privilege,” Sandoval said Saturday. The Supreme Court “is the essence of justice in this country.”
Sandoval was unanimously confirmed by the Senate when he was nominated to a district court position by President George W. Bush in 2005, on Reid’s recommendation. He quit four years later to mount a challenge to Nevada’s incumbent governor, a race he won easily. But Sandoval has always said he wouldn’t mind returning to the bench at some point.
“I loved my job as a judge when I did it,” Sandoval said Saturday. “I, as I sit here, don’t know what I’m going to do next. But I do know I’m the governor of Nevada.”…
Asked which Supreme Court justices he admired, Sandoval pointed to Sandra Day O’Connor, who served in Arizona’s state legislature before becoming a federal judge and, eventually, the first woman to serve on the high court.
How does O’Connor II sound, conservatives? Look on the bright side: This time, at least you’ll know going in that Sandoval’s prepared to sell you out on abortion.
Now, let me blow your mind with a hypothesis: With Trump as the near-certain GOP nominee, the Senate Republican majority is better off making a deal with Obama to confirm someone this year than waiting for the results of the election. Think about it. If Hillary wins, she’ll want to impress liberals who held their noses and turned out for her so she’ll nominate someone who’s reliably left-wing. The GOP could block that nominee, as we’ll have enough seats for a filibuster next year even in a worst-case scenario, but Schumer could always nuke the filibuster — and even if he doesn’t, there’s no running out the clock on Hillary. You can Bork her first nominee, but resistance will wear down for the second. She’ll wait us out. If Trump wins, meanwhile, the Senate GOP will be a in bind. They can work on him behind the scenes to appoint a strong conservative to the Court, but Trump’s likely to drift towards the center, not towards the right, in the general election. If he beats Hillary, it’ll be with a centrist coalition. He may try to reward those voters and set the tone for his presidency with a centrist Court nominee capable of winning votes from both parties. What do Senate Republicans do then, with the new leader of the party fresh off his stunning presidential victory? Do they dare try to Bork his choice right out of the gate? Not a chance, I think, which means you’re trusting Donald Trump to make a strong conservative pick and spare them that dilemma. How lucky do you feel?
All of that being so, the Senate GOP may never have as much leverage over the next justice as it does right now. Republicans have a majority for the moment and they’re under far less pressure to confirm an Obama nominee than they’d be under with Hillary or Trump in the White House. If you believe the conventional wisdom about Trump as a weak nominee with poor favorables who’ll ruin Republicans down-ballot, they’re also far less likely to maintain that Senate majority next year than they’d be with Rubio at the top of the ticket. They can dictate some terms if they want to make a deal with O right now (although not on abortion, alas). With Hillary or Trump, they might not be able to dictate any. Why wait for next year, then, rather than make a deal right now?

http://hotair.com/archives/2016/02/24/surprise-obama-vetting-gop-gov-brian-sandoval-for-scalias-supreme-court-seat/
 

Bill of Rights Suspended


Bill of Rights Suspended in 
Georgetown County South Carolina 
4th Amendment GONE!


 

Georgetown County in violation of the SC State Constitution and the US Constitution has suspended the Fourth Amendment. Non-law enforcement Agents of the county claim the RIGHT (not privilege) to search you property and enter your home residence without permission and without warrants to look for bags of trash and rodents (among a plethora of other things to look for in order to find a violation of INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE)! They have also adopted thousands of pages of International Code as County ordinances without circulating it to the public and without using it for some time.
ACT NOW! SC citizens must check their local ordinances to see if their county has also adopted foreign legislation as law without their input or vote! This is PROPERTY MAINTENANCE NOT building and zoning. Regulations are given dictating how you must clean and order your home. Penalty for noncompliance is imprisonment and the crime is a misdemeanor but no Miranda or Bill of Rights is acknowledged or obeyed. DANGER, DANGER!!!

Here are the ordinances, codes, and web sites of Georgetown County to confirm this story.
Don't wait til they show up at your door, the first shot has been fired, act now. Demand obedience of the SC Constitution in YOUR county and in Georgetown County NOW!
Search by County Agents WITHOUT WARRANT or Due Process of Law: Article 15
http://www.georgetowncountysc.org/zon...

Georgetown County Ordinance Adopting the International Codes
http://library.municode.com/showDocum...

Downloads of the Code
http://www.claremorecity.com/Document...
http://publicecodes.citation.com/icod...

Original Zoning Ordinances with NO reference to International Codes as presented to County Citizens
http://www.georgetowncountysc.org/zon...


ALERT: ASTEROID FIRST WEEK OF MARCH TO HIT EARTH


ASTEROID # 2013 T68X
Should occur first week of MARCH 2016

        Published on Feb 25, 2016
      Euro Space Agency Updates Asteroid 2013


 



GOOD WORDS FROM STEVE JOBS


GOOD WORDS FROM STEVE JOBS 
 
Pretty awesome observation from Steve Jobs in his final days

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=784270991699738&set=a.150451191748391.30110.100003505330578&type=3

The last words of Steve Jobs -

I have come to the pinnacle of success in business.
  In the eyes of others, my life has been the symbol of success.  However, apart from work, I have little joy. Finally, my wealth is simply a fact to which I am accustomed.  At this time, lying on the hospital bed and remembering all my life, I realize that all the accolades and riches of which I was once so proud, have become insignificant with my imminent death.  In the dark, when I look at green lights, of the equipment for artificial respiration and feel the buzz of their mechanical sounds, I can feel the breath of my approaching death looming over me. 

Only now do I understand that once you accumulate enough money for the rest of your life, you have to pursue objectives that are not related to wealth.
  It should be something more important:  For example, stories of love, art, dreams of my childhood.  No, stop pursuing wealth, it can only make a person into a twisted being, just like me. 

God has made us one way, we can feel the love in the heart of each of us, and not illusions built by fame or money, like I made in my life, I cannot take them with me.
  I can only take with me the memories that were strengthened by love.  This is the true wealth that will follow you; will accompany you, he will give strength and light to go ahead. 

Love can travel thousands of miles and so life has no limits. Move to where you want to go.
  Strive to reach the goals you want to achieve. Everything is in your heart and in your hands. 

What is the world's most expensive bed?
  The hospital bed.  You, if you have money, you can hire someone to drive your car, but you cannot hire someone to take your illness that is killing you.  Material things lost can be found.  But one thing you can never find when you lose: life.  Whatever stage of life where we are right now, at the end we will have to face the day when the curtain falls. 

Please treasure your family love, love for your spouse, love for your friends. Treat everyone well and stay friendly with your neighbors.

BLM & Forest Service are at it again - more planned land grabs

House Republicans seek to open up national forests to mining and logging 


The defunct U.S.A. private corporation and sub-corporations, pretending to be our 'government,' continues to rape and pillage our national resources while using hired mercenaries posing as FBI, BLM, Natl Forest Service, and others along with traitorous 'judges,', 'sheriffs', et al to run our ranchers off and steal their lands and minerals. 

Weeks after an 'anti-government' militia’s takeover of an Oregon wildlife refuge, USA private defunct corporation 'legislators' are presenting bills to loosen 'federal' authority over public land so they can continue with their rape and pillage and STEALING of the land and mineral resources belonging to the people.

Congress is to consider two bills that would allow states to hand over vast tracts of 'federal land' for mining, logging or other commercial activities – just weeks after the arrest of an armed militia that took over a wildlife refuge in Oregon in protest at 'federal' oversight of public land.  

Just WHO or WHAT is receiving the PROFITS from STEALING the land and natural resources belonging to THE PEOPLE because surely it is NOT the people?  

WHO has the AUTHORITY to release those lands and minerals to for-profit corporations?  

The people have NOT BEEN ADVISED NOR had the opportunity to VOTE on what is to be done with the land and resources.  The 'federal oversight' needs to be clarified as to 

(1) the Wash DC and state 'governments' are NOT our TRUE government but private defunct corporate for-profit robber barons, and 

(2) the time has come for the people to run these basturds OUT OF OUR NATION once and for all, and to resurrect our TRUE GOVERNMENT, the REPUBLIC.  

The American people REFUSE to CONTINUE to be treated as the SLAVES of these corporate and phony 'government' thieves.  We DEMAND our nation be returned to us, and we DEMAND that these corporate thieves be arrested and hung or shot for theft and treason.  They are no better than horse thieves in the 1800s and banksters who already have been being arrested and/or shot to death in China for their thievery.

The legislation, which will be presented to the House committee on natural resources on Thursday Feb 25th, would loosen 'federal authority' over parts of the 600m acres (240m hectares), nearly one-third of the land mass of the US it 'administers'.

A bill put forward by Republican Don Young would allow any state to assume control of up to 2m acres of the national forest system to be “managed primarily for timber production” in order to address what Young claims is a decline in 'national logging rates'.

A further bill, written by Republican Raúl Labrador, would allow the corporation state governors to assign up to 4m acres of land as “forest demonstration areas”, which would allow logging free from any 'federal' water, air or endangered species restrictions.  (If you go in to a forest and chop down a tree for Christmas, you will be arrested, heavily fined and most likely incarcerated, but this bill allows any for-profit corporation to chop down trees (logging) for profit while stripping the nation of natural growth which contributes to cleaner air, more oxygen and a natural habitat for our animals. The cut down trees are then shipped to China for processing and returned for sale to the united states. Our land and our bank accounts are totally stripped while logging companies like Weyerhaeuser, Boise Cascade, Simpson  and Pacific Lumber)

These bastards are also receiving kickbacks from these logging and mining for-profit corporations, payola and bribery payment for assuring that the legislation to increase their profits is passed.  To hell with what happens to our nation and the people.

The bills, which will be heard by a Republican-dominated committee, come just two weeks after the dramatic end to the armed militia occupation of the Malheur national wildlife refuge in Oregon. The 41-day 'occupation', which resulted in the fatal shooting (OUTRIGHT PREMEDITATED MURDER) of the militia’s spokesman, LaVoy Finicum) before the arrest of the rest of the group was sparked by the group’s anger at 'federal' land use regulations.

The heavily armed militia, led by Ammon and Ryan Bundy, said the 'occupation' could last for “several years”, with some saying they were willing to die for the cause.

Republican 'presidential' (of a private defunct corporation pretending to be our government) contender Ted Cruz recently aligned himself with sentiments expressed by the group, releasing an advertisement in Nevada that criticized federal control of public land. “If you trust me with your vote, I will fight day and night to return full control of Nevada’s lands to its rightful owners,” Cruz said in the advertisement. The Texas senator came third in the Republican caucus in Nevada.

Environmentalists have decried the latest attempt to strip federal control from public land, warning that endangered species and vital ecosystem services, such as clean water, will be put at risk.

“The natural resources committee is pretty radicalized at this point,” said Bobby McEnaney, senior lands analyst at the Natural Resources Defense Council. “The fact that they would react to what’s happened in Oregon to advance an agenda to take land from the 'federal government' (this nation does not have a federal government - but instead a criminal mafia defrauding the entire planet) is seriously tone deaf.

“Most of this committee didn’t condemn the actions at Malheur, so this is not completely unexpected. The agenda here is being driven by oil, gas and timber industries. The Republicans are interested in a deregulation race to zero."

Donald Barry, senior vice-president for conservation programs at Defenders of Wildlife, said the authors of the bill were in a “time warp”.  “One would expect this kind of thing would happen in the 1900s, but not the 21st century,” he said.  “National forests are no longer viewed by the public as an ATM machine based on the exploitation of natural resources. They are places to hike, camp and to be protected in order to provide clean water supplies. The American people clearly realize this now.  The idea that states will manage this land well is just an illusion.  (IT IS BEING CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED THAT THE 'FEDERAL' CANNOT AND WILL NOT MANAGE THE LAND WELL) They don’t have the resources to do so, which means there will be a fire sale for mining and timber companies. The American public would lose access to these lands. Those days should be behind us.”  (In comes China and Russia, among others, to steal our nations land and resources while moving the people off their lands, and poisoning the soil, water and air in the process.)

The authors of the bills, along with the committee chairman, Rob Bishop, were all approached for comment.  (What?  NO comments in response to the queries?  How convenient - hide behind the veil so the public hasn't a clue the illegal actions they are taking against their constitutents.)

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/feb/24/house-republicans-open-national-forests-mining-logging-oregon-militia-malheur-wildlife-refuge 

AMERICA:  WE MUST STEP UP TO THE PLATE NOW AND GIVE IT OUR BEST SWING TO WIN THIS BATTLE OR WE WILL BE LITERALLY DISQUALIFIED AND DOOMED TO THE BIGGEST DEFEAT WE HAVE EVER SUFFERED.  IT IS UP TO US NOW - THESE TRAITORS ARE NOT AND WILL NOT STAND WITH US - THEY ARE STANDING ACROSS THE LINE AGAINST US.   CHOOSE YOUR SIDE.  GET IN ONE OF THE TWO LINEUPS AND FIGHT TO THE DEATH TO WIN.