WIKILEAKS JUST RELEASED FULL ISIS DONOR LIST WITH NAMES

BREAKING WIKILEAKS JUST RELEASED FULL ISIS DONOR LIST WITH NAMES

Julian Assange Can No Longer Remain Quiet

Martin Walsh

Oct 28, 2016

Breaking News

      Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton                                   are the founders of ISIS

We have proven that through emails and documents leaked from WikiLeaks, but liberal media outlets still refuse to cover it.

After all, they are still more focused on what Trump said eleven years ago than what Hillary has actually done.

Because of brave patriots like Julian Assange (and Edward Snowden), we have been given more evidence that Hillary Clinton is more connected to ISIS than we originally believed.

An email was leaked between Clinton and John Podesta indicating that: “Western intelligence, US intelligence and sources in the region” to accuse Qatar and Saudi Arabia of “providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL [or ISIS] and other radical Sunni groups in the region.”

Citing the need to “use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets,” said Hillary to Podesta while arguing the current developments in the Middle East were “important to the U.S. for reasons that often differ from country to country.”

Odd that Clinton argues Saudi Arabia and Qatar are helping fund ISIS when Hillary’s largest donations come from those two countries.

                                    Hillary Clinton is funded by nations that fund ISIS
                                                                   Coincidence?

In another correspondence from 2012, the Director of Foreign Policy at the Clinton Foundation, Amitabh Desai, set up a meeting with Bill Clinton for five minutes in exchange for a $1,000,000 “birthday check."

The email adds that the small but rich nation occupying the Qatar Peninsula would “welcome [the Clinton Foundation’s] suggestions for investments in Haiti — particularly on education and health.” Desai added that while Qatar had already “allocated most of their $20 million … [they were] happy to consider projects we suggest.”

Martin Walsh ‏@mrwalsh8

Bill Clinton gets $1M from Qatar for his birthday. FYI: It's legal and common practice in Qatar for husbands to beat and rape their wives.

We now see two more examples of the Clinton’s acting corrupt and being intertwined with nations that fund ISIS.

For those that do not see where the dots connect, let’s simplify how this all worked for Hillary.

Hillary, as Secretary of State, would sell terrorist nations large weapons deals only after they gave her a very generous donation to her “foundation.” These weapons, provided by Hillary and her State Department, then filtered down from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Libya, and so on to create, supply, and bolster terrorist groups.

That is exactly how ISIS was created. But instead of blowing them up with an air assault, Hillary and Obama decided to leave ISIS alone. Why? Because ISIS being in the Middle East allows the Obama/Clinton machine to make millions in personal profits from these nations in a repetitive cycle of selling weapons.

They are choosing personal gain over eliminating a terrorist group. Let that sink in. Why else have they not arrested Hillary for all of these crimes? The FBI would arrest you in a heartbeat if you went to Facebook right now to praise Allah and ISIS.

It also speaks volumes as to why they are trying so hard to silence Julian Assange.

The media remains silent on all of this. This would be plastered all over the news for months if a President Trump was exposed for this.

Ignorant politicians are not the problem. The problem is that ignorant people keep voting for them every election. This is the exact reason we desperately need change in this country, and it starts with Donald Trump.

People like Julian Assange have given up their lives to expose corruption in government and allowing Hillary Clinton to win this election makes all of his sacrifices meaningless.

He has offered us a chance to revolt against our tyrannical government. Chances likes this do not occur often and, if we do not seize the opportunity, we will suffer another four (?) years of suppression from our corrupt leaders.

Vote Trump, so that we can save America and he can pardon Julian Assange.

https://conservativedailypost.com/breaking-wikileaks-just-released-full-isis-donor-list-with-names/ 

https://conservativedailypost.com/breaking-wikileaks-just-released-full-isis-donor-list-with-names/?utm_source=Push&utm_campaign=28_October_1010&utm_medium=OneSignal

NAZI procedures continue against Native Indians in the Dakotas

5  Things  You  Need  to  Know  About  the  Blacked  Out  Dakota  Access  Pipeline  Protests

NAZI procedures continue in the Dakotas - expansion of prior illegal actions against the Bundys, Santilli, Finicum and the Hammonds 

 

 

October 28 2016
Nick Bernabe  

A small Standing Rock Sioux site in North Dakota called the Sacred Stone Camp has been propelled into the national news narrative following their stand against the Dakota Access Pipeline. Due in part to independent media coverage of the ongoing standoff, the Sacred Stone camp has grown into a formidable opposition against the $3.8 billion, 1,200-mile long pipeline.

Due to misinformation coming from law-enforcement, political favoritism toward the pipeline builders, and the media’s blatant reluctance to report on the pipeline, it’s hard to tell truth from fiction. Anti-Media, along with our partners in the independent media and our embedded journalist at the opposition encampment have been covering the unfolding standoff continuously. 

Here are five things you need to know.

1. Who is opposing the pipeline — and why
The Standing Rock Sioux tribe is leading the opposition to the Dakota Access Pipeline. They have been joined by the largest tribal coalition in over 100 years in their stand against the pipeline. The coalition is also comprised of activists, allies, and environmentalists, collectively known as “water protectors,” at the Sacred Stone Camp, an encampment close to the location where the pipeline is planned to cross the Missouri River in North Dakota. According to the Sacred Stone camp website, they are opposing the pipeline because “[t]he Dakota Access threatens everything from farming and drinking water to entire ecosystems, wildlife and food sources surrounding the Missouri.”

The Standing Rock Sioux also say the pipeline is violating treaty land, Sioux territory that was established many years ago by the federal government. “We will not allow Dakota Access to trespass on our treaty territory and destroy our medicines and our culture.”

The opposition to the pipeline spreads across several states and is not opposed solely by Native Americans. 

Farmers, ranchers, and landowners are also opposed to the pipeline. Many of them have had their land taken from them against their will and given to the pipeline via eminent domain.

2. The U.S. 'government' and the pipeline corporation (a group of investors looking to make a killing off the pipeline, seizing privately owned lands to do it) are continuing a long tradition of disrespecting Native Americans

The United States has a very bad reputation for treating Native Americans, the original inhabitants of this land, as less than human. In many instances in the past, the land where Native Americans lived was deemed to be of higher value than the Natives’ lives.

Such has been the case in North Dakota — not only now, but in the past as well. According to The Atlantic:

“The land beneath the pipeline was accorded to Sioux peoples by the Treaty of Fort Laramie in 1868. Eleven years later, the U.S. government incited and won the Great Sioux War, and ‘renegotiated’ a new treaty with the Sioux under threat of starvation. In that document, the tribe ceded much of the Laramie land, including the Black Hills of South Dakota, where many whites believed there to be gold.”

After the 'federal government' (cabal crime syndicate - not a government) relegated the Sioux people to the “Great Sioux Reservation” in 1851, the treaty was re-written and “renegotiated” by force whenever resources were discovered or when the 'U.S. government' wanted land. 
(The 'government' is not to own land except for true government military etc) Essentially, the Sioux people were victims of U.S.  sanctioned murder, and their land was stolen because gold was discovered on it.

Fast forward to 2016 and the Sioux people are once again making a stand on land that was once — and still is, according to the tribe — theirs. 

How is the 'government' reacting to this stand? By brutally arresting the Native American water protectors for trespassing. If that is not a miscarriage of justice, I don’t know what is.

Further, Energy Transfer Partners, the company pulling the strings behind the DAPL, has deep pockets, and its lobbyists have cozied up to federal, state, and local governments with jurisdiction over the pipeline route. This could explain why the company began its construction of the pipeline on Army Corps of Engineers land without even securing an easement, which is required by law. Dakota Access LLC, a subsidiary of Energy Transfer Partners, has also used the strong-arm of 'government' to force farmers and landowners to hand over their land to the pipeline against their will.

3. Violent acts are being carried out in North Dakota, but not by the water protectors

Violence is breaking out at the Dakota Access Protest site, but the protesters have nothing to do with it. 

Pipeline police, bolstered by the North Dakota National Guard and sheriffs imported from around the country, have turned the standoff into a war zone.  

Water protectors are regularly pepper sprayed, tear gassed, and violently arrested. Over the weekend, 127 people were detained in the biggest mass arrest to date.

Militarized police at the Dakota Access Pipeline site are decked out in riot gear, armed with military grade weapons, use armored cars or MRAPs with snipers on top of them, and have regularly used LRADs, a type of mass crowd dispersal weapon that uses a high pitched noise to hurt people’s ears —sometimes permanently.

Early reports of protesters being armed and violent have proven to be instances of misinformation spread by law enforcement apparently seeking to demonize the opposition. No credible reports of violence by the protesters have been confirmed or prosecuted. Nearly all arrests stem from trespassing charges or crimes of journalism.

When protesters initially began using civil disobedience to physically shut down the Dakota Access Pipeline site, they were confronted violently by security guards from British mercenary firm G4S. The mercs sicced dogs and used pepper spray on the protesters in an assault that went viral and helped catalyze even more support for the water protectors.

4. Independent media is under attack at the Dakota 

Access Pipeline — and the corporate media is ignoring it.
Independent media’s broadcasts over the Internet are basically the only reason people around the country and the world now know about the struggle at Standing Rock.  

Unfortunately, journalists are not immune to the police crackdowns in North Dakota. Dozens of journalists have now been arrested, and an arrest warrant was issued for high-profile journalist Amy Goodman. One independent media outlet, Unicorn Riot, saw four of their journalists arrested in one day in North Dakota. One filmmaker is facing up to 45 years in prison for filming acts of civil disobedience against the pipeline. Anti-Media’s journalist on the ground, Derrick Broze, was tased by law enforcement while covering the protests on Thursday as this article was being written.

Meanwhile, the national corporate media ignored the battle against the Dakota Access Pipeline as long as they could. For months, despite the DAPL emergence into the national narrative, ABC and NBC refused to air any coverage about it. 

A woman was arrested for protesting the pipeline on her own farm after Dakota Access LLC gained access to it against her will via eminent domain — yet there was still no corporate media coverage on the incident.

5. How you can help the opposition

Now that you see what water protectors are up against in North Dakota, here’s what you can do to help.

• Get yourself to the Sacred Stone Camp. The water protectors need reinforcements as people are regularly arrested. The bigger the stand, the more likely the pipeline’s construction will be halted. Here’s how to get there.
• Send supplies or donations. Water protectors need your help with supplies and funding. Go to this link to send supplies. Go to this link to donate to the cause.
• Support independent journalists that risk arrest to bring you the news from the front lines. Follow Sacred Stone Camp on Facebook. Share this article.
• For 10 more ways to get involved, click here.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/5-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-blacked-out-dakota-access-pipeline-protests_102016 

IF Americans don't BEGIN RIGHT NOW to stand up together to help each other, we will ALL GO DOWN TOGETHER. PLEASE - GET INVOLVED!  HELP OUR BROTHERS AND SISTERS!  DO WHATEVER YOU CAN - BUT DO SOMETHING!  The more we sit back and do nothing, the more the enemy within will gather momentum against all of us. 

 

Drugs for votes. Ballots for sale. Corrupt poll workers, a magistrate, and even a NUN. Read this list of convicted voting fraudsters and ask: are you SURE the presidential election's integrity is beyond doubt?

It is an election already surrounded by questions over its integrity thanks to Republican candidate Donald Trump's refusal to promise to accept its outcome.

Claims that the public cannot trust that all votes are accurate and legal have been pushed back by the White House and by the Clinton campaign, who see it as a way to delegitimize the victory they expect in November.

And one academic's claim that there just 31 'credible' incidents of voter impersonation in one billion cast ballots - a claim made in 2014 in the Washington Post - has been posted repeatedly on social media.

But a snapshot survey of convictions for voting fraud committed in the last five years by DailyMail.com suggests that complacency about the integrity of the ballot may be misguided.

We uncovered a series of convictions. Many of them are not for voter impersonation - literally turning up at the polling place and claiming to be someone else - that has been the focus of much of the pushback.

The findings also show that many cases are dealt with by plea bargain, with the offenders pleading guilty to a reduced number of charges.

And one intriguing aspect of our findings is about where the fraudulent votes may have been directed.

None of the convictions detailed which party the fraudulent vote had been or was intended to be cast, since to attempt to find out would violate the secrecy of the ballot box.

But supporters of both parties are found on the DailyMail.com list, suggesting neither Republicans nor Democrats have reason to be complacent that the electoral system which will be put to the test on November 8 is above question.

Here are the cases we found.

BUSINESS OWNER WHO VOTED OVER AND OVER

+15

+15

Multiple votes: Robert Monroe voted repeatedly in three elections, one of them the recall election of Wisconsin's Republican governor Scott Walker (right) whom he had supported

Milwaukee County, Wisconsin 2013. A lengthy investigation was launched into voting fraud - and six convictions followed

Robert Monroe, 52. Insurance firm owner. Shorewood, Wisconsin

Charge: 13 counts illegal voting

Conviction: Six counts of illegal voting

Sentence: Year in jail, five years probation

What happened: Cast five votes during recall election for Scott Walker in 2011, two in the 2012 presidential election and multiple times in other 2011 elections. Was said to be a supporter of Walker, the Republican governor of Wisconsin

Leonard K Brown, 56.

Charge: Six counts of illegal voting

Conviction: Five counts of illegal voting

Sentence: Nine months jail

What happened: Voted twice in 2012 presidential election, voted twice in five previous elections

Voting Chad: Gigowski got six months in jail

Chad Gigowski, 28.

Charge: Three counts illegal voting

Conviction: One count illegal voting

Sentence: Six months in jail

What happened: Voted twice on the day in 2012 presidential election in two places

Andrew Shepherd, 32. Special voter registration worker

Charge: One count lying to election officials

Conviction: One count lying to election officials

Sentence: 30 days jail

What happened: Lied that he did not already have a felony record so he could be campaign worker. Registered six voters.

+15

Engineering result: Todd Murray voted twice

Todd Murray, 34. Engineer. West Allis, Wisconsin.

Charge: One count illegal voting

Conviction: One count illegal voting

Sentence: 90 days jail

What happened: Registered and voted on the day of 2012 election in New Berlin, then voted at his own polling place in New Berlin.

Brittany Rainey, 23.

Charge: One count illegal voting

Conviction: One count illegal voting

Sentence: 45 days jail

What happened: Voted despite existing felony record for child cruelty

VOTED EARLY, VOTED AGAIN IN HER PRECINCT

Ohio fraudster: Virginia McMillan

Greene County, Ohio. February 2013.

Virginia McMilllan, 56. Beavercreek, Ohio.

Charge: One count illegal voting

Conviction: One count illegal voting

Sentence: 20 days jail.

What happened: Cast an early ballot then voted in her precinct.

A POLL WORKER AND A NUN WHO USED OTHERS' VOTES

+15

+15

Round-up: Melowese Richardson (left) and Sister Marguerite Kloos (right) were both convicted of voting in other people's names. Kloos had to quit her job as dean at a Catholic university

Hamilton County, Ohio, 2013. 28 subpoenaed in 19 potential cases of voter fraud. Five prosecutions. Four convictions, two more arrest warrants issued.

Melowese Richardson, 58. Poll worker. Hamilton County, Ohio.

Charge: Eight counts of illegal voting

Conviction: Four counts of illegal voting

Sentence: Five years in prison. Freed after eight months.

What happened: Voted as herself, her granddaughter and her comatose sister in 2012. Her granddaughter voted again herself. Also voted for sister in 2008 and 2011. Said in her defense she would 'fight it for Mr Obama'.

Sister Marguerite Kloos, 55. Nun. Delhi Township, Ohio.

Dean of Division of Arts and Humanities at College of Mount Saint Joseph, a Catholic university in Cincinnati.

Charge: One count illegal voting

Conviction: One count illegal voting

Sentence: Probation

What happened: Voted in name of nun who had died a month before. Quit as Dean of Division of Arts and Humanities.

Russell Glassop, 76. Retired. Symmes Township, Ohio.

Charge: One count illegal voting

Conviction: One count illegal voting

Sentence: Probation

What happened: Used his dead wife's absentee ballot.

Margaret Allen, 64. Loveland. Ohio.

Charge: One count illegal voting

Conviction: One count illegal voting

Sentence: Probation

What happened: Used absentee ballot despite being Florida resident

VOTING ACROSS STATE LINES AGAIN AND AGAIN

Kansas, 2015/2016. Secretary of State Kris Kobach said up to 100 cases of double voting had been identified. Four prosecutions have been successfully brought so far.

Plea deal: Oil boss Randal Kilian pleaded to one count of illegal voting

Randal Kilian, 62. Oil company executive. Colorado.

Charge: Three counts illegal voting

Conviction: One count illegal voting

Sentence: $2,500 fine

What happened: Voted in Kansas and Colorado in 2012 election, caught by multi-state database

Ron Weems, 77. Retired. Wichita, Kansas.

Charge: Five counts related to voting fraud

Conviction: Two counts voting without being qualified, one count unlawful advance voting

Sentence: $5,500 fine

What happened: Voted in Wichita and Teller County, Colorado, in both 2012 and 2014 elections

Another plea: Steven Gaedtke was charged with three counts and accepted guilt on one

Steven Gaedtke. USAF Vietnam veteran. Yelville, Arkansas.

Charge: Three counts illegal voting

Conviction: One count illegal voting

Sentence: $500 fine

What happened: Got early voting paper in Kansas despite living in Arkansas - and used it.

Michael Hannum, 64. Omaha, Nebraska.

Charge: Four counts illegal voting

Conviction: Three counts illegal voting

Sentence: $5,500 fine

What happened: Voted in both Johnson County, Kansas, and Nebraska in 2012 election

ABSENTEE BALLOTS FILLED IN BY CAMPAIGNER

Felon: Samuel Jean filled in ballots

Samuel Jean, 43. Campaign worker. Homestead, Florida.

Charge: Two felony counts of unlawfully marking ballot

Conviction: No contest to two felony counts of unlawfully marking ballot

Sentence: Probation, no conviction on official record

What happened: Filled in absentee ballots during 2013 mayoral election in Homestead

CONGRESSMAN'S TOP AIDE AND THE 1,800 BALLOTS

Fake the vote: Jeffrey Garcia (left) was chief of staff to Joe Garcia (right), the unrelated Democratic Congressman, when he was involved in a bid to have 1,800 absentee ballot requests made for voters who had not asked for them

Jeffrey Garcia, 41. Chief of staff to Congressman Joe Garcia. Miami-Dade County, Florida.

Charge: Election fraud Conviction: Election fraud

Sentence: 90 day jail, banned from political campaign work or volunteering

What happened: Directed campaign for Congressman Joe Garcia (D) to submit 1,800 absentee-ballot requests on behalf of unsuspecting voters.

131

A Crash Course in Skepticism--- and Hope - Judge Anna

By Anna Von Reitz

Take a good look at my face.  My hooded eyes.  My cupid's bow pout.  Where have you seen them before?  Only in all the great houses and the great portrait galleries of the world.  I am a Hapsburg.  The map of the Holy Roman Empire is written on my face. 

A hundred generations of European skullduggery runs in my veins.  I am the living heir of the Holy Roman Empire---- first, second, third, fourth, and however many iterations of it there are or may be, here I am, the end of the line. 

It all comes down to me and the Holy See knows it. 

Merovingian, Carolingian, Batavian, Hanoverian, Mecklenburger, Liechtensteiner, I am like the Grand Central Station of bloodlines, all intersecting. 

And as Voltaire correctly observed, the mess that I am heir to is not holy, not Roman, and not an empire. 

It's an unholy, worldwide, multi-national corporation that my Father lived and died to protect me from ever knowing anything about. 

Thanks to him, my Father, I grew up innocent as the flowers in May of any such heritage.  It was only after his death that the darkness began to ooze forward, like a pool of blood from a corpse hidden under the bed.

Just as you can look at my face and know more or less where I came from, you can look at other faces, too. 

Take out your newspaper clippings and look at photos of George Bush. Senior and George W. Bush and Jeb Bush and then look at their "cousins"-- Governors Bill and Scott Walker.

Look at Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski's face and family history and what do you find? 

It's all over, everywhere, hidden in plain sight---- and easy to read for anyone who has eyes to see and ears to hear. 

All these crazy stories you are hearing about ruling families and bloodlines are true, but that being true does not necessarily give rise to all the other crappola that is deduced or extrapolated from it or theorized about it.

Being a Hapsburg doesn't mean that I drink blood for breakfast.  It doesn't mean that I am super-wealthy.  It doesn't mean anything more or less than being a Johnson or an O'Brien or a Montagne. 

Individuals are born into families, and that's the way it is.

For perhaps a million or more years on this planet, an advanced civilization prospered.  It was a caste system similar to the caste system still found in India today.  Circa 32,000 years ago, this Aryan civilization was destroyed in what is known as The Great Plasma War. 

You live in its wreckage every day. 

These people being identified and called  "Reptilians" are descendants of the Warrior Caste of that ancient civilization  They were born and bred for war the same way that Dachshunds are bred for going down badger holes.  They can't help being what they are and they are not intrinsically evil, but they are not well-suited to functioning as political leaders.

They simply step into the gap for lack of anyone else to do it, and then get blamed for accepting the ugly job nobody else wants.

In the ancient Aryan Caste System, the rulers were the priests, and the priests were not priests as we think of them today.  They were scientists and they were known as the "All Seeing"----for their uncanny ability to see through and beyond appearances and to discern truth in spite of all efforts to lie and obfuscate.

How is it that I always know the truth, whether I want to or not? 

Blaming people for their genetic heritage--- whether it is expressed as a skin color or an inability to think beyond patterns of "either/or" or a deformed arm--- is like blaming a rock for being granite instead of sandstone.

You have to take each utterly unique creation one by one, just as God makes them, judging them according to their fruits and their words and their deeds. If you are sane yourself, you can't make assumptions about people and write them off because of such inheritances--- "Oh, he's a Rothschild, so he's bad!" is as illogical as, "She's got green eyes, so she's jealous!"

One of the best allies I have had in the long fight to free people and see to it that they have what they need to thrive and be happy is a Rothschild.

And I will stand in front of the World Court or anywhere else on Earth and say so, too. 

Another True Friend of decency and peace and compassion is descended from the Egyptian Pharoahs. 

Another is a Muslim who faithfully prays five times a day, facing Mecca, and he is faultlessly generous and wise and kind.

Another is a former member of the Russian Mafia, who "turned the corner", experienced miracles in his life, and came to God.

It's not where we all come from that counts---- it's where we are going, and on this journey you can make no pat assumptions about anyone or anything.  You have to look and see and think for yourselves.

You have to be skeptical, yes, very skeptical all the time.  You have to test and weigh things in the balance.  You have to look for the motivations behind what people say and do.  You have to do your own sifting and proving. 

But in the end, you also have to take chances and believe and make leaps of faith, because as necessary as healthy cynicism is, it serves only the limited function of winnowing out the bad from the good and the true from the false. It does nothing positive toward building a future. 

A man may have been a criminal ten years ago and be a saint today. 

If I am to speak to you as I would speak to my own son, I would say that we walk on a balance beam all our days, and that we must be resolute in the face of great evil and recognize it for what it is.  Yet at the same time, there is no need to fear and no need to falter.

In our heart of hearts we all know what is good.  We all know what is true. We all know what is valuable.

Focus on that.  Keep it mind.  Hold it close.  Let that be your compass in all the strange and even bizarre things that happen. Your logic may fail you.  Your senses may deceive you.  Your heart may mislead you.  But the Holy Spirit which is Truth lives in you and if you listen closely and with an open mind, the "still small Voice" will bring you safely home.

---------------------------------------

See this article and over 300 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

 

http://nesara.news/index.php/a-crash-course-in-skepticism

Late in the Evening Comes the Dawn -- The Bundys Exonerated - Judge Anna

By Anna Von Reitz

For months now members of the Living Law Firm have labored to bring forward vital information to the patriots imprisoned over the stand-off at the Malheur Wildlife Refuge near Burns, Oregon.  They have labored side by side with Bar Attorneys who risked their careers and honored their calling to seek justice for all. 

And last night, just before bedtime, I got a call. 

The Bundys, Shawna Cox, and all the others misidentified and falsely accused by the corporate scum have been exonerated and found "Not Guilty" on all charges.

This is a true victory and one that was won against a stacked deck. 

The trial was held in a Federal Court--- a court owned and operated by sister corporations of those corporations that brought the charges.

Imagine that you and Cousin Bobby Sue are squabbling over the ownership rights of a doughnut.  She has already eaten hers, so she grabbed yours.  You objected.  And her aunt from the other side of the family gets to decide who gets the doughnut.

Not exactly a level playing field.  Her Aunt knows her and doesn't know you from Adam.  And Bobby Sue is jumping up and down and pointing her finger at you and saying, "It's my doughnut!  It's mine! He tried to take it from me!"

You are standing there as Aunt Bertha comes down on you, knowing full well that you spent your allowance for the weekend buying the doughnut Bobby Sue already wolfed down, plus the doughnut she is trying to steal from you.

You did your part and more.  Without you, there wouldn't be a doughnut to fight over. You were the source of the property from the start, but Aunt Bertha doesn't know that.  She's standing there in her Size 11's, glaring at you, moving her tremendous bulk into position to seize the doughnut back, give it to Bobby Sue, and paddle your butt.

That's the position the Bundys and Shawna Cox and the others have been in from the start of this fiasco.  The truth of the matter was utterly obscured and they have had to fight uphill every step of the way against the prejudice of the Court and the Media and the zombie-like ignorance of millions of government slaves.

Throughout the trial the judge kept redacting evidence and disallowing evidence.  Sometimes it seemed like the Bundys weren't going to be allowed to present their side of the story at all.  The jury wasn't allowed to know their political status.  Historical facts were "disallowed".  It was gag order upon gag order.

The protesters had to stand trial as if they were "citizens" obligated to obey and serve the government, otherwise the government couldn't claim jurisdiction over them, so the government judge just "disallowed" the evidence showing otherwise.

And the jury?  Well, the jury pool was --- you guessed it --- all government "citizens"---- people who at least on paper admit to being employees or dependents of the government and who owe their "allegiance"---- as in serfs and kings, to the government. 

Now imagine the situation.

Aunt Bertha has you by the ear and is dragging you into the house where all Bobby Sue's other relatives are gathered.  They are going to be your jury.  And Aunt Bertha isn't even letting you tell your side of the story--- just bits and pieces of it that she deems credible.

You are being tried as a stranger in a strange land.  You are being judged by foreigners who have a natural conflict of interest and bias against you, because "one of theirs" stands to gain if you are found guilty and dispossessed of your property. 

Against all odds against it, that unlikely jury found the Bundys and the others not guilty on all charges.  Somehow, somewhere, the truth rang out and they heard it despite every attempt to squelch it.

God bless the jurors.

Even if they weren't actually "peers" of the Bundys and the others, even if they were "pledged" as infants to be stoodges owned and operated by the government and its franchise corporations, like the BLM and FBI, they still delivered the only right, true, and honest verdict possible.

It was a long, hard, dangerous proceeding, but in the end, the jury prevailed. Justice was done. And it only took six hours of deliberation.

For the Bundys there is one more challenge to be faced, because there were also charges brought in Nevada.  There, again. they will face the same situation, the same false presumptions, the same trial as strangers in a foreign jurisdiction, being judged by people who have a natural conflict of interest. 

But within that conflict of interest lies the germinating seed of truth--- and the realization that in truth, we are all Americans.  We all have a dog in this fight.

---------------------------------------

See this article and over 300 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

 

http://nesara.news/index.php/late-in-the-evening-comes

A Plague of Hopelessly Inept Demands and Declarations --- Reply for Ron - Judge Anna

by Anna Von Reitz

This is for my friend, Ron, and for his friends and their friends of friends who have been running around the past few weeks passing out all sorts of "Orders" and "Demands" and "Charges" in the name of "We, the People, of the United States of America".......

There are all sorts of groups out there now doing similar things and making similar mistakes and wasting their time, so as heartfelt and passionate and outraged as it all is, I had to review one of these publications and say------

"Yes, but it is all totally useless and meaningless and if you take the time to listen I can tell you why."  [-----Again.] 

Americans are defined as "the free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States". 

Catch that? 

NOT the "free, sovereign and independent people of the United States of America". 

That is because there is no country called the United States of America.  And no National Trust established under that name. 

It's the "United States Declaration of Independence" --- not the "United States of America Declaration of Independence".

Where you start seeing the words "united States of America" is in the original Constitution, called "The Constitution for the united States of America"------ but note, there is a small "u" on the word "united".  It is used as an adjective describing "States of America"---- the actual name of the entity contracting for services from the federal government.

And what was the "States of America"? 

It was a group of states (originally nine out of thirteen) who chose to create an association of "states" outside the already existing perpetual union created by The Articles of Confederation (1781). 

Remember that in legalese, the word "of" means "without" in the sense of "within and without" or "outside of" or "belonging to" in the sense of a possession or attachment.

So "States of America" means "States Without America" or "States Outside of America" or "States Belonging to America"---- but they are not the same as the United States. 

There are the States and there are the "States of States".   There is the within and the without.  There is the land jurisdiction of the geographically defined state referred to as the "Texas State" and there is the "State of Texas" which is a corporation in the business of providing governmental services.

So what are the "united" States of America?  They are businesses providing government services to the people living inside the boundaries of the land mass called "Texas" or "Rhode Island" or "Tennessee" that united in delegating some of their "powers" --that is, services they are responsible for providing--- to a new subcontractor, an entity known as the "federal government". 

Originally, there were only nine out of thirteen, but the advantages  and cost efficiency of banding together to provide for self-defense and with regard to other tasks, eventually won out.

By 1868, these original "State of State" businesses had incorporated under the auspices of the State of Delaware, the only State in the Union to have a Chancery Court and to allow insurance and registration of commercial corporations ----and they formed a new organization---an international commercial corporation calling itself the "United States of America".

The United States of America formed by the "States of_________" was a private, mostly foreign-owned, multi-national corporation operating franchises under names styled as "State of Florida" and "State of Oklahoma" et alia and all these member franchises are in the business of providing government services.

So when you say, "We, the People, of the United States of America"----- what are you talking about?  The only "people" involved in operating the "United States of America" are government employees, and by definition, government employees exist to serve the government----not to be served by it. 

We are treated to the unlikely and ultimately farce-like spectacle of people identifying themselves as government employees---- and at the same time trying to boss the government around.

Do employees boss their employer around?  Since when? 

Can you think of anything more pathetic?  Laughable?  Sad?

The authors of these high-sounding "demands" are most likely angry, half-awake, "stubbed my toe and ran out of coffee" American State Nationals blundering around with all their assumptions about reality intact and not a clue in this world what is actually going on. They don't realize yet that they are "people of the United States" and not "People of the United States of America"---- and they probably haven't even noticed that there is a difference.

But if you want to get beyond the stumbling around and angry stage you have to notice and you have to think.

If you want to act and be recognized as Americans and give orders to the government, you have to say, "We, the People, of the United States" ------the ones who signed The Declaration of Independence, the ones who fought the Revolution, the ones who own the land of the United States, the ones who are owed the United States Trust, the ones who are NOT bound by or parties to any "Constitution" and who owe no duty of "citizenship" at all to any government. 

Because "We, the People of the United States of America" are all government employees, elected officials, their dependents, etc., and they are all British Subjects, all bound and required to serve the government, and they can't order the government around because they work for the government and are dependent on the government and are considered "franchisees" of the government.

Now, isn't that a kick in the pants?   Maybe someone--- you--- should explain all this to these folks?  And while you are at it, tell them that even when and if you choose to reclaim your actual birthright political status as American State Nationals and even when and if you choose to act as one of the "free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States"----it is still true that you catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar and it is not fair, right, or honorable to be rude and accusatory and unkind toward people who are just as confused as you were before I clued you in. 

So if you feel any shred of thankfulness for the half hour I spent writing all this down for you and your friends, be as kind to the government employees as I have been to you.  Show them some decency and respect and realize that they really are just here to serve you---- once you stop shouting and unwittingly claiming to be one of them.

---------------------------------------

See this article and over 300 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

http://nesara.news/index.php/a-plague-of-hopelessly-inept

Postscript to "A Plague of Hopelessly Inept Demands and Declarations" - Judge Anna

By Anna Von Reitz

I said something that wasn't quite correct in the prior post -- "A Plague of Hopelessly Inept Demands and Declarations"--- because I didn't touch on things that happened after the time period we were discussing when the "United States of America" first reared its head.

I said that there was no country called "United States of America" and no National Trust established under that name, and at the time period we were talking about, that is true---- but circa 1900-1904, that changed.

The Insular States and District of Columbia joined together to form a country called "United States of America", sometimes referred to as "United States of America (Minor)" early last century.

The United States of America (Minor) is populated by United States Citizens who are all British Subjects operating as a democracy.  The Island of Puerto Rico has opted to be a Commonwealth within this union of "American states". 

The United States of America Minor has a land jurisdiction represented by the ten square miles of the District of Columbia and the land holdings of the Insular Island "states" that are part of this separate and foreign country.

It's "citizens" are allowed to roam freely around the fifty American states as "residents" here to provide essential government services.

To serve their "citizens" who are "residents" here they have set up their "State of State" franchises, which are all foreign states with respect to us. 

The "State of Florida" is a corporate franchise of the old United States of America. 

The "STATE OF FLORIDA" is a corporate franchise of the UNITED STATES, INC.,

And all of these so-called "inchoate" corporate franchise "states" are foreign with respect to you and your organic states of the Union.  Literally foreign.

So also are the people functioning as either "United States Citizens" or as "citizens of the United States" ----- all technically foreigners, all either presumed to be federal or "federated state" employees, or federal dependents--- and operating under foreign law and in foreign jurisdictions with respect to you and your actual, factual states of the Union.

So, yes, Virginia---and Ron--- there is now a country called the United States of America (Minor) and it has a seat of government in the District of Columbia which is defined as the "State of New Columbia" for the purposes of the "union" formed by the "American states" that are part of the United States of America (Minor). 

And I trust that the magnitude of the confusion and corruption caused by all this abuse of deceptively similar names is now becoming painfully apparent, along with the outrages and usurpations and disservice we American State Nationals have suffered because of it.

And this somewhat alters some of the presumptions that MIGHT be made with regard to the proliferation of Demands and Declarations that are pouring forth all of a sudden. 

From what I am reading I surmise that most, if not all, of these heartfelt diatribes are coming from disoriented American State Nationals operating under false assumptions of citizenship and being part of the "United States of America"----- but it could be possible that at least some of this is coming from people who truly understand that they are "United States Citizens" living in the inchoate states of the United States of America, Inc.----and who are fed up with it. 

But in either case, it still presents itself as people who have no standing to complain against their employers----just different groups doing the same thing.

---------------------------------------

See this article and over 300 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

 

http://nesara.news/index.php/postscript-to-quot-a-plague

George Soros - We thought you would like to know

George Soros - We thought you would like to know

George Soros has great wealth at a massive $23 billion net worth.  

This mansion is where Soro calls home and offers a tennis court, exquisite landscaping, a pool and a circular courtyard at the entry. 

As if this mansion wasn’t large enough, Soros recently added a 19-room addition that spreads over another 19 acres of the property.