Wednesday, October 31, 2018

IMF "Take Over" of Federal Reserve


By Anna Von Reitz

Urgent Message to Americans Age 80 and Over


By Anna Von Reitz


Urgent Message to Americans Age 80 and Over

We need your help.
False claims are being made to the effect that we consented to being British subjects, that we willingly consigned all our assets and land and homes as chattel backing the debts of the British Crown Corporation and voluntarily adopted a Commonwealth as our form of government, that we gave up our constitutional guarantees, and that we agreed to be considered "citizens" of the British Territorial United States, purportedly in equitable exchange for welfare benefits that we financed and paid for ourselves. 

In fact, we were never told about any of these false claims. 

This Hogwash being promoted by the guilty parties needs to be rebutted and rebuked by the eye-witnesses who were alive at the time and who have first-hand knowledge of the facts and events. 

We have abundant evidence that on March 6, 1933, at a private meeting of the  Conference of Governors, the British Territorial Governors  "pledged" the assets of "their states and the citizenry thereof" to pay off the debts of the "United States of America" Incorporated, a religious non-profit corporation fronted by the Roman Catholic Church as a Delaware Corporation in 1925 and bankrupted in 1933.

Of course, their "States of States" had nothing whatsoever to do with our States and their "citizenry" had nothing to do with our State Citizens.  

Nonetheless, as a result of this "pledge" of foreign assets, Americans were deliberately mistaken-on-purpose as British Subjects, and kidnapped into the foreign jurisdiction of the British Territorial United States, there to be plundered and conscripted and divested of their rights, property assets, and other guarantees in Gross Breach of Trust.

We have abundant evidence that Franklin Delano Roosevelt lied through his teeth to the American People and never disclosed the meaning, intent, or result of his New Deal---- which was treason wrapped in a blanket, a self-serving and odious plot to further undermine our national sovereignty and rob us blind for the sake of foreign interests. 

And now they want to claim that we all knew what was going on and willingly, voluntarily consented to all this abuse and damned lies and false claims and foreign Inquisitors occupying our courtrooms to collect debts we never owed. 

There can be no words competent to describe the infamy of the British Territorial United States or the criminality of the Holy See for allowing any of these practices against The United States of America and the innocent American People. 

According to their deeds, Rome, Westminster, and London should all be turned to sheets of glass, with Hong Kong and Washington, DC and Ontario, Canada, to follow. 

We stood by these wretched bastards through two World Wars, and this is the thanks we get for it.   They have attempted to genocide us on paper and leave us holding the bag for all their debts, all their war-mongering, all their sins. 

So now is the time for pay back and an end to all this self-serving drivel that we "consented" to any of this abuse and theft.  

We are calling upon those Americans who are 80 years of age and above to come forward and given testimony based on their living recollection of the events taking place in the 1930's and 40's.  We are calling upon their sons and daughters to help them do the paperwork and get their testimony witnessed by a Public Notary and recorded at the local land recording offices.  We are asking that you all send a certified copy to: The Living Law Firm, 1336 Staubbach Circle, Anchorage, Alaska 99508.  

In doing this, you will also create a Public Record in defense of your own property and establish evidence to protect your whole family from these vermin and their lies. 

We realize that this may be a bit difficult to organize, so we have created and attached a basic template that can be used all over the country.  For those who have more specific information to bring forward and who feel competent to do so, please add and adjust.  For convenience sake, we colored the specific information you need to change in the template red. 

Please discuss the situation with your Elders and those who understand the situation, please encourage them to come forward and testify in behalf of all Americans. And get it on the record, so we can shove it down their throats. 

Notice to All Wannabe Interlopers:

Gingrich: Caravan is an attack on US sovereignty


Fox News

Troops at the boader plus President Trump ignites birthright citizenship battle


Fox News

Tuesday, October 30, 2018

Dad's grief leads to quest to count deaths caused by illegal immigrant drivers


Arnie Rosner
On Oct 30, 2018, at 2:37 PM, robert bowen <wbowen333@hotmail.com> wrote:

Dad's grief leads to quest to count deaths caused by illegal immigrant drivers

Mother of officer killed by illegal on immigration debate

Mary Ann Mendoza wrote letter to GOP candidates urging support for victims of illegal aliens
In the five years since an unlicensed illegal immigrant ran down his son, Don Rosenberg has turned his anger and grief into a mission to answer a seemingly simple question: How many people are killed each year by drivers who don’t belong in the U.S., much less behind a wheel?
Drew Rosenberg, a 25-year-old student at Golden Gate University, was riding his motorcycle in San Francisco when Roberto Galo struck him on Nov. 16, 2010. In his frenzied effort to flee the scene, Galo ran over his victim twice. The elder Rosenberg got the news no parent should hear from San Francisco General Hospital that night, but what he would learn over the next few years only compounded his bitterness.
As many as 7,500 Americans -- 20 per day -- are killed annually by unlicensed drivers, and Rosenberg calculates that more than half are the victims of illegal immigrants. Now, by testifying before lawmakers, speaking to parents who have been through the same ordeal and posting his research on his nonprofit’s website, unlicensedtodrive.org, Rosenberg is shedding light on a frightening number not readily available from government sources.
“Our archives are filled with stories of drunk-driving illegals killing U.S. citizens.”
— William Gheen, Americans for Legal Immigration
“I was stunned at what I found,” said Rosenberg, who at 63 is semi-retired from the entertainment and publishing industry. “Not only were unlicensed drivers killing people in numbers only exceeded by drunk drivers, but many times they were barely being punished and many times faced no charges at all.”
Galo, a Honduran, who entered the country illegally but earned temporary protective status, had been cited five months earlier for driving without a license or insurance and heading the wrong way on a one-way street in San Francisco. His car was impounded for a day, he paid a fine for the moving violation and the other charges were dropped.
Drew Rosenberg, (l.), was killed by a man his father Don, (r.), believes should not have been in the country.
Drew Rosenberg, (l.), was killed by a man his father Don, (r.), believes should not have been in the country. (Courtesy: Don Rosenberg)
After he was convicted of manslaughter, Galo served six weeks in jail and was released. He was deported in 2013 after a years-long legal battle.
Because state and federal highway safety officials do not classify deaths by the perpetrator’s immigration stats, tabulating the deadly toll of unlicensed, illegal immigrant drivers has been a painstaking effort.  Rosenberg has pored through spreadsheets and studies, piecing together numbers that show his son’s death was neither necessary nor unique. Still, his estimate is just that, and it varies from the guesses of other groups.
Brandon Mendoza, (l.), was killed by an unlicensed illegal immigrant, prompting his mother, Mary Ann Mendoza, (r.), to become an activist.
Brandon Mendoza, (l.), was killed by an unlicensed illegal immigrant, prompting his mother, Mary Ann Mendoza, (r.), to become an activist. (Courtesy: Mary Ann Mendoza)
“I’ve learned over time that many jurisdictions do not cite license status or immigration status when reporting these statistics, so if anything, the numbers are understated,” he said. “For example, San Francisco doesn’t report either criteria, so Drew’s death defaults to having been killed by a licensed driver who was a citizen.”
Such imprecise government bookkeeping masks a frightening and, critics say, preventable danger. The AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, which obtains state-by-state data from the federal government Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) database – found that 20 percent of fatal crashes involved an unlicensed driver. From 2010-2014, there was an average of 32,887 road deaths per year, which would mean 6,577 were caused by unlicensed drivers. Those drivers include citizens with suspended or revoked licenses, and those who never had licenses. But if half are illegal immigrants, it would be in line with Rosenberg’s estimates.
“Our archives are filled with stories of drunk-driving illegals killing U.S. citizens,” William Gheen, of the Americans for Legal Immigration Political Action Committee, told FoxNews.com. “It is our official estimate that more than 3,000 U.S citizens lose their lives each year due to the insufficient enforcement of our existing border and immigration law.”
Brandon Mendoza was a 32-year-old, Mesa, Ariz., policeman in 2014 when an unlicensed, illegal immigrant driver drove drunk the wrong way on a freeway and killed him. Raul Silva-Corona had been convicted of criminal conspiracy in Colorado 20 years earlier, but never deported.
Mendoza’s mother believes the government could make the roads safer by at least deporting illegal immigrants who have been convicted of crimes.
“I don't believe it's reality to be able to get all of the illegals out of the country, but I do believe we need to get the criminal element out of here and secure the border so that they cannot continue to keep coming back,” Mary Ann Mendoza said.
Like Rosenberg, Mendoza has turned her grief into activism, starting a memorial foundation to continue her fallen son’s legacy and urging policymakers to take the issue more seriously.

The Great Silver Mystery…REVEALED!


IUV
Let me start off by saying that what I am going to postulate should not in any way be considered fact…because I am not in possession of proof. I am merely postulating on where all the mystery silver comes from to be sold on the physical silver market.
Since the early 2000’s almost every serious silver analyst has been pounding the table that there is no above ground silver available and it is the “buy of a lifetime”. But at the same time, silver prices never seem to live up to their expectation. Of course, anyone with an ounce of common sense can see that the COMEX and LME silver markets are rigged by a powerful cabal of bankers (and others) that seem to be above the law (or more likely, in collusion with the law), but at the end of the day physical silver must be delivered for industrial applications and investors taking possession. So where does it all come from? ….I think I may have stumbled upon the answer!
After a grueling day of watching another COMEX silver rigging operation in late December, I turned on the History Channel for some mindless entertainment. The program that was running was called “Lost Worlds – Secret Cities of the A-Bomb” (you can buy it here http://store.aetv.com/html/product/index.jhtml?id=76496). It was an investigative piece on the Manhattan Project focusing on the Top Secret city that was built in Oakridge, TN and a facility called Y-12. The program was interesting to me, but one part specifically made me jump up out of my seat and run to my computer to find out what it was all about...continue article here

HR 6976 : Gold Reserve Act of 1934

IUV


Gold Reserve Act of 1934.. see act here

Statement regarding Kerry Cassidy – Kevin Moore and Mark Richards


IUV

Individuals Join Together to ‘Walk Away’ From Democratic Party: “We walked away alone, but now we march together.”

IUV


WASHINGTON—The mainstream media ignored it completely. President Donald Trump wrote about it on Twitter. And on a rainy weekend, the members of the Walk Away movement made a statement about recovering themselves and loving America.
The five-month-old Walk Away campaign—the joining of individuals who used Facebook to express their desire to leave the Democratic Party—became so much more than a hashtag, with a three-day festival marked by high spirits, fiery speeches, and a pretty good turnout, despite the cold rain.
On Twitter, progressive pedants posted photos from unflattering angles, seeking to prove that the crowd was smaller than the 5,500 claimed by organizers. Nevertheless, it was a triumph for the new, hybrid grassroots movement that, in some ways, has picked up where the Tea Party left off.
The motley movement that has confounded and enraged the left proved itself, first of all, to be human (not bots—digital creations used to manipulate social media—as some on the left had claimed), and humorous and determined, to boot.
On Oct. 27, with a short, 15-minute march in the rain from John Marshall Park to Freedom Plaza, Walk Away strode into the American populist, free-speech renaissance that’s exploding nationwide in the era of Trump. People descended from all across the country to attend the various events. One couple even came all the way from New Zealand... continue article here

2018 10 28 Connecting Consciousness – Simon Parkes


Connecting Consciousness – Simon Parkes

How Vermont’s Catholic Church hid decades of child abuse


IUV

BURLINGTON — Before Vermont Catholic Bishop Christopher Coyne invited questions at a recent press conference pledging cooperation with a current local and state investigation of past church-related misconduct, he turned to reporters with his own inquiry.
“Want me to mike up?” he asked. “Any problem with the sound?”
Longtime observers of the statewide Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington couldn’t believe what they were hearing. They remember the church’s muzzling response regarding the late priest Michael Madden, who was charged with sexual improprieties during a 20-year career at five parishes and the local St. Joseph’s Orphanage — the latter the subject of a recent BuzzFeed story that sparked the new probe.
In the 1980s, a county state’s attorney tried to subpoena then-Bishop John Marshall, who served from 1972 to 1992, to testify in court. The diocese, citing the Bible and the U.S. Constitution, argued its leader was immune from such calls.
“In order for the church, its priests and bishops … to enjoy the constitutional right to freely exercise their ecclesiastical or religious functions,” one of its lawyers argued, “it is essential that they have independence from state authority.”
A judge went on to rule the diocese had to provide internal information. But the church didn’t comply with that demand either, prompting the state to drop multiple sexual assault charges against Madden in return for a no-contest plea on a single count of lewd and lascivious conduct.
Bishop John Marshall
Bishop John Marshall served from 1972 to 1992. Provided photo
The priest, spared prison with a deferred sentence, opted out of a state Corrections Department sex offender treatment program for a church-run alternative. There he told a therapist he had molested dozens of teenage boys — only to go on to violate his probation six times and, only because of that, serve two years in jail.
Vermont’s Catholic Church is making headlines this fall by agreeing to work with law enforcement, releasing past child abuse victims from nondisclosure agreements and forming a lay committee to review clergy misconduct files and publicly release the names of abusers — news in part because the state’s largest religious denomination has a decades-long history of defying court orders and outside review... continue article here

Yes, He Can and No, He Can't

 
By Anna Von Reitz

There is a big flap this morning because President Trump is trying to end the "Anchor Baby" provisions that immigrants and the INS have been abusing, by ending birthright citizenship claims related to "U.S. Citizenship". 

Many people have reacted in alarm and thought that this means that he has power to end their birthright claims of nationality and State Citizenship.  

The real answer is: yes, he can, and no, he can't. 

As President of a corporation, already empowered by over 350 "emergency powers" granted to his Office by the British Territorial United States Congress back in the 1930's and continued by their Successors, Donald J. Trump can do darn near anything in the wide world he wants to do with respect to the day to day operations of that corporation, its subsidiaries, its subcontractors, its employees, its policies, and its statutory "laws".  

It was, after all, their policy to allow "Anchor Babies" to provide their families with instant access to our country in the first place, and many would argue an irresponsible policy, too. It is Mr. Trump's job as President to alter corporate policies as necessary to deal with emergencies.  The "National Emergency" status as already been declared.  He is already in position to move.  God bless him.  Being born on American soil makes the baby an American, but doesn't (necessarily) make him a "U.S. Citizen".

I have been trying to get exactly this point across for many months.  

That said, as President of a foreign corporation, Donald J. Trump has no ability or authorization to tamper with any aspect of American nationality or American State Citizenship.  As above, it is entirely possible for a baby born on the soil of California to be a Californian, but there is nothing that makes his Mother or Father a Californian, too.  They have already been born on the soil of Honduras or Mexico or wherever else, which establishes their nationality and citizenship obligations, if any.  

This idea that they could busload hundreds of women in late pregnancy to the border, offload them like cattle, and then simply wait for them to give birth on American soil and thereby get a free pass for everyone in the family all the way back to the grandparents to become "U.S. citizens" was always crackpot and a means to end run around the Public Law.  

It is also a cruelly deceptive means to entrap these people who are seeking freedom in the corporate enslavement racket instead. 

Mexicans and Hondurans are not worth as much as slaves in the international slave market, but when they cross our border they magically gain in value astronomically, simply by having the label "U.S. citizen" attached to them.  This sets up a situation where both the corporations serving "as" governments can profit by their migration.  

All the U.S. Government has to do is provide a cut of the resulting profit to the Honduran or Mexican or other "government" corporation, and they will be happy to send an unending supply of new "U.S. citizens" to our borders.  This is profitable for both corporations, because the value of an average "U.S. citizen" is far and away above any welfare costs or benefits the people ever receive, and the "U.S." Inc. can borrow against the value of its "citizenry" in the world slave market, thus providing extra income for the vermin in DC.  

That is the dirty reason for all the dirty Democrats supporting mass immigration. 

It's also the reason for all the forced immigration of Muslims -- quite apart from the wars in the Middle East -- into Europe. 

A German "citizen" is worth a lot more than a Yemen "citizen" and the guilty governments are profiting themselves without regard for the people they are supposed to serve. 

I gave a citation yesterday regarding "U.S. citizenship" and got back a response that someone went online and couldn't find it.  

First, be aware that if you want to read law you have to go to a Law Library and read the hard copy, and if you want to know what really happened you have to go into the case files.  What appears online is often heavily redacted, simplified, and annotated in various ways. Second, it has been profitable to the knaves to hide key citations and they have done so, just as they have burned books and suppressed treaties throughout their history.  Third, that's far, far from the only citation giving you the same facts (and more) about the issue of "citizenship".  

Here's a few more to cut your teeth on, for all of you who aren't sure that there is a difference between being an American and being a "U.S. citizen": 

“We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own...” United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)

“...he was not a citizen of the United States, he was a citizen and voter of the State,...” “One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States”. McDonel v. The State, 90 Ind. 320 (1883)

“That there is a citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a state,...” Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)

"A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government ..." Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383

"On the other hand, there is a significant historical fact in all of this. Clearly, one of the purposes of the 13th and 14th Amendments and of the 1866 act and of section 1982 was to give the Negro citizenship. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. (1967), 379 F.2d 33, 43.

"The object of the 14th Amendment, as is well known, was to confer upon the colored race the right of citizenship. " United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649, 692.

“The governments of the United States and of each state of the several states are distinct from one another. The rights of a citizen under one may be quite different from those which he has under the other”. Colgate v. Harvey, 296 U.S. 404; 56 S.Ct. 252 (1935)

“There is a difference between privileges and immunities belonging to the citizens of the United States as such, and those belonging to the citizens of each state as such”. 
Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41 (1900) 

“The rights and privileges, and immunities which the fourteenth constitutional amendment and Rev. St. section 1979 [U.S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1262], for its enforcement, were designated to protect, are such as belonging to citizens of the United States as such, and not as citizens of a state”. Wadleigh v. Newhall 136 F. 941 (1905)

“...rights of national citizenship as distinct from the fundamental or natural rights inherent in state citizenship”. Madden v. Kentucky, 309 U.S. 83: 84 L.Ed. 590 (1940)
----And, always note, that the so-called "Revised Statutes" were never actually enrolled on the Federal Register, that is, never actually "Revised" except for internal corporate use, because those making the revisions never had the power or authority to make them apply generally.  


The Latest From ECETI & James Gilliland



The Latest From ECETI & James Gilliland
ECETI.ORG

Latest News - Oct 30th 2018

James Gilliland on Veritas Why Disclosure has Stalled - Link 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBFlnhDlOQ8

Alien Base Entrance On Mount Adams, at ECETI Ranch, Famous UFO Sighting News - Link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBNOTEtc5fU

Q Anon - Suspicious Package - In Pursuit of Truth Presents - 10.27.18 - Link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUtED73dgG0

Officials and Investigators: "Mostly Men ... Creating Problems W/ Robberies & Crimes" - Link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddXoeypThOw

Tom Fitton's Video Weekly Update - Florida Mail Bomber & EXCLUSIVE Report on Caravan Crisis - Link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQvQ72uJa6g

Day 16.2 Jamal Khashoggi’s Failed Coup - CIA Wanted KSA To Proxy In Yemen - Link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7GL7Sa0jSI&feature=youtu.be

Oh my...I can't believe I actually SAW it! - They are VERY real. - Link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kG15jrOjeA

Latest News - Oct 30th 2018

Up Coming Events


Transpersonal Release Session with James

Also other services are available.

FOR MORE CLICK HERE

Sky Watch Events


Come for a Sky Watch Weekend

FOR MORE CLICK HERE