Monday, June 25, 2012

Obama Health Care Law News Update

Obama's Solicitor General, and recent appointment to the bench, has leaked to Obama the courts vote of last Friday was 5/4 to strike down Obama's health care law. Look to see the Democrats heavy hand in trying to get the decision changed before the June announcement. Obama May Be In Deep Trouble with Chief Justice John Roberts, US Supreme Court

           Anthony G. Martin - North St. Paul News

          
According to sources who watch the inner workings of the
federal government, a smack-down of Barack Obama by the US Supreme Court may be
inevitable.
Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have
hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues. Critics have complained
that much, if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into
Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government. Obama certainly did not
help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue
of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court
over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various
organizations to run political ads during the time of an election. The
tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice
Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's
not true,' when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling.

As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the
relationship
between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal
government. Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly
continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known
Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years.
          
Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his
number one
enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck,
Hannity and so on. And it is no accident that the one
swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated
recently that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.'          
Apparently, the Court has had enough. The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very
subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about
which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven. A ruling against
Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially cripple the
Administration.  Such a thing would be long overdue.
First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional
principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to
purchase something.

And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers
to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim. The
          
Constitution limits the FEDERAL government, not state
governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a
citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding
not to drive a vehicle. In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt
out.'

Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted
information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that
raise serio
us questions about his eligibility for the office of President.
The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information
involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut ,
while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii
          
And that is only the tip of the iceberg.

Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity,
conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many
Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court.
          
Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics,
nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this
Administration, not even during the Nixon years. Nixon and the Watergate conspirators
look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this
Administration.
In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on
the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona . That,
too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given
that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.
And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire
house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation
concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue
the New Black Panther Party. The group was caught on tape committing
felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away
from the polls.
A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging
Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks,
particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black
Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white
people and their babies. This one is a biggie that could send the entire
Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a
line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Please do not delete this until you pass it on.

No comments: