Does payment with Fed Reserve Note constitute waiver of rights? Lohan & U.S. slaves
FULL PAGE COMMENT
Disclaimer
Please do not construe anything in this article as legal advice. Always seek competent advice from your attorney. (Especially if you can find one who is not ZOG, Zionist Government Occupied)
I only received one criticism of my article on Lindsay Lohan's bank accounts seized. There is a lesson for U.S. slave-citizens to observe in her case, however, and that's why I called attention to her situation. If you turn away from some issues here because you don't wish to read about a 'party girl', then I think you miss something central to why US persons can never seem to make enough money to get a solid position in life.
I didn't write the article just to show sympathy for a 'party girl' as has been described to me, but to illustrate how citizens from all walks have had these destructive frequencies following them around like a bad smell. John Akwei, for instance, has had an ongoing huge lawsuit against the N.S.A. for the frequencies and mind control, brain-scanning program(s) applied to him. See:
Remote Measurement of Brain Signatures
http://remoteneuroimaging.blogspot.de/2011/01/john-akwei-v-nsa_15.html
and other sites concerning the Akwei case.
Also, I have been told that there are persons out on the highways for many years now who have been firing stun gun blasts into other drivers and/or their headlights, etc. One person wrote me how he swerved and one perp fired missing his car and shot out another driver's headlight. There may be the possibility that government agencies hire these perps(stalkers), yet when it hits the headlines the story reads that some star must have been drunked up or high, etc.. A lot of cars, pick-ups, and SUVs have been crashing into buildings lately. Why?
So there may be a great deal more to anyone's ordeals than you read about in the mainslime media.
Federal Reserve Notes
When you claim the 5th Amendment for your testimony in a court proceeding it is supposedly the right against self incrimination, but if you have already begun answering questions it may be considered testimony, in which case you may be compelled by the court to continue answering questions (testimony) without the option of stating the 5th Amendment or be held in contempt.
Does this same principle apply to paying with Federal Reserve Notes? What do I mean by this? The Federal Reserve Note is not legal money as defined by The Constitution. Only gold or silver coin are legal money, but currency representing gold or silver have been accepted as legal money in the past, as in 'silver certificates', etc.. Those old notes had "pay to the bearer on demand" clauses on them. Something like, "This note is legal tender for all debts public and private and is redeemable in lawful money at any Federal Reserve Bank", etc. was written on them, also. That promise has been removed on the new Federal Reserve Notes.
This means, basically, the Federal Reserve Note, aka, 'fraud note', is or has become a sort of debt note, not actual money, but a note representing the borrowing at interest from The Federal Reserve Corporation, a private corporation.
When you begin paying a debt with 'frauds', are you not stating your legal position? I realize we are all forced to use these 'frauds' if we are not rich enough to own gold and silver, but that is the position we are forced in to by BIG GUV.
If you begin paying a debt with 'frauds' you may be inadvertently making a statement of your legal status. There are many legal statuses.....slave, private citizen, public servant, soldier, criminal, etc., etc., etc..
Therefore if you begin paying an agency like the IRS (which is not a ratified, legal part of government) with 'frauds' are you going to be able to contest your case with them in the future?
It's been reported that another film star paid or gave payment of $ 100,000.oo on behalf of Lindsay Lohan's IRS bill. Did that star actually do her a favor in paying it? Did that star actually pay it or give it to Lohan's attorney's, accountants, etc..? Those facts may not be exactly available, generally, but one thing is for sure. If you begin waiving your rights it may be very difficult to stop waiving them in the future.
And if you have a history of paying taxes with checks on FDSLIC banks or with 'frauds', will you be able to challenge any future cases?
Get the picture here?
Why can't so many Americans ever get 'enough'? Why can't we get enough ahead to last us and get a secure 'sovereign citizen' status in America instead of remaining struggling slaves always raped and pillaged by ZIO-CON IRS, inflation, pain at the pump, predatory property taxes, and other such scams? We are a victimized people who hardly own anything as long as we must pay every year just to keep our land.
Infoeditor
|
7 comments:
Anything under the commercial system that is not contested you will always loose. Silence is acquiescence in commerce. If you do not make clear your jurisdiction as well as theirs in court, you may as well bend over, no matter how much you know. It is more than to know how to play on the court you have to know the rules and guidelines as well as the order of motion in the court. So many are so close yet they are repeating more than understanding.
As long as you preach technicalities your playing their game and we will never be free. Resistance,constitutional civil disobedience is the only way to get these treasonous corp. bastards out of our hair.
Agree and disagree.
When you know you are not in their jurisdiction, they will still abide by their rules of court; but do you?
That's the problem some gurus have had people chasing their tail about.
If I don't want to be here, and you drag me here to play a game and I don't want to play, do I get involved in your game, or everytime you call a name and expect ME to answer to it, I can say, I should not be here but you obviously need me here to complete your work. I have nothing to say and nothing to contribute and I don't belong to you. (In so many words.)
There's more to it than that, and I'm not going to teach it here because I learned it by seeking and since all men are created equal, we learn things when we are ready to learn them. Some will get mad and say, how can I learn it if you don't teach me? I'll say there are many teachers and when you are ready, and you know they are extensions of you, (that's why you should not 'kill' yourself, so what's the reason for owning a gun, huh?), they each will teach you something that will expand your knowledge. When you connect the dots, it still doesn't matter until you apply it. If you apply it without faith, that is, you apply it thinking you can't or you let the system tell you who you are (which by then you'll know they are extensions of you so why argue with Self), then you'll be able to move about in Love.
But too many believe in the paradigm of duality and so it's not worth teaching them something that will break My Karma and cause Me to have to deal with the energies for the damage they can cause for knowing something intellectually before they were ready spiritually to apply it without harming another.
Gauging the posters that hate Obama and read this blog is clue that you do not teach them something they aren't ready to spiritually learn when they are still living in hate, thinking another One no matter color, sex, religion, country, or whatever things 'man in his limited mind' can figure out to make someone not Us; is worth killing or defaming, or hating, or any number of things people can do to keep 'separation alive'.
I ain't teaching it.
But when they are ready to learn, and are spiritually ready, all that divisive stuff will just fall away because they'll see a whole new world. The enemy that helps them, the other religion that serves them, the other political party making decisions that benefit them.
You can't make a blindfolded man see.
When he chooses to take off the blindfold and witness his world without obstruction, he'll know. He'll know.
FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES are Private Script from a private corporation. I'll paste below a portion of a more lengthy article from some years back:
"Federal Reserve Notes are not dollars." U.S. Treasury, General Counsel, Munk. And,
"Both notes and checks are acknowledgments of indebtedness and promise of payment." Hegeman v. Moon, 131 N.Y. 462, 30 N.E. 487. Smith v. Treuhart et al, 223 N.Y.S. 481. And,
A fact noted above must be reiterated here, first, that “law” and “money” (gold and silver) are “interlocked and directly connected”, and, after finding that Federal Reserve Notes are “worthless securities” (words from the IRS), can be “stolen”, as in “robbery”, and being worthless, are a “Fiction Of Law”. For that reason, I must bring into focus one Biblical Declaration, quoted below:
KJV – II Thes. 2:7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
WORLD ENGLISH VERSION – II Thes. 2:7 For the mystery of lawlessness does already work. Only there is one who restrains now, until he is taken out of the way.
The “MYSTERY” spoken of is that we have no money, therefore we have no law. “Lawlessness” means “moneyless”. We have been without money and law since 1933; these 70 (+) years have ye been in Babylon!
"Any false representation of material facts made with knowledge of falsity and with intent that it shall be acted on by another in entering into contract, and which is so acted upon, constitutes "fraud," and entitles party deceived to avoid contracts or recover damages.” Barnsdall Refining Corp. v. Birnamwood Oil Co., 92 F.2d 817.
As the United States Treasury was abolished in 1921 by the Act of 1920, 66th Congress Session II Ch. 214 amending section 3595, this Movant cannot only turn to the newly created Department of Treasury, a private corporation, dealing only in commercial paper, which is not redeemable for lawful money, minted coin of gold and silver.
Notes NOT Redeemable
"Subject to an obligation of redemption; embodying, or conditioned upon, a promise or obligation of redemption; controvertible to coin, as, a redeemable currency." U.S. v. North Carolina, 136 U.S. 211, 34 L.Ed. 336. And, [Note: the word “controvertible means: To raise arguments against; voice opposition to.]
I am aware that it is a violation of law to demand and/or collect any tender except lawful money which is defined by supreme law.
"...to comply is impossible, made so by the failure of the state in its constitutional duty, U.S. Const. 1:10: 1, the remedy resting in the hands of the state." Rio Grande v. Darke, 167 P. 241. Or,
Will this "court" do as has been done before, as in: Maggio v. Zeitz, 333 U.S. 56 (1948), in affirming the Court said: "Although we know that Maggio cannot comply with the order, we must keep a straight face and pretend that he can, and must thus affirm orders which first direct Maggio to do an impossibility, and then punish him for refusal to perform it."
This kind of "justice" is a total disgrace. So, we have no "justice", no "money", no "judges", no "juries", and no "hope" without a "Thomas Jefferson" 20 year revolution.
I really dont see what you are disagreeing with in regards to my post. I just left a few things out which you seemed to have covered quite well to be honest ^_^
In dealing with the courts it is best not to get caught in controversy of any kind, they deal in that sort of thing. Key is to do their jobs for them (file oaths on all parties, only bring facts etc) but it is all paperwork. Get it into the file, speak the truth and ONLY ask questions in the court room. Oh and lastly, be sure to check the calendar the night before so they wont try and slip you in a sooner hearing without you knowing giving them the whole FTA thing.
Cheers!
There is no such thing as a sovereign citizen. Its an oxymoron. If you are a citizen you are a subject to a higher authority. If you consent to being a citizen, a subject to a higher authority, then you have nothing to complain about. Accept your medicine you consented to and bend over, spread your checks wide and take your pounding you agreed to accept.
You don't need no stinking revolution. You only need wake up and stop volunteering to participate in a foreign corporation you are not even a party to. Simple as that. Problem solved!
Post a Comment