HISTORICAL PROOF FOUND DEC. 1, 2012. JESUS CHRIST BORN DEC. 25. EVIDENCE FROM ROME AND

     "Genius Is 1% Inspiration And 99% Perspiration!" - Thomas Edison

     "Good Bible Scholarship Is 1% Inspiration And 99% Perspiration." - Erasmus of America

     Good Bible Scholarship is not by random chance, no magic wand approach to find important answers. Unless God intervenes and directly pops the answer to you, it is mainly tedious work, methodical work like the old German scholars used to have the reputation of hunting down every little detail until they cracked the secret they were after or learned how the field really worked. With tricks of the trade from military intelligence plus tons of dry, what people would call "dull" scholarship, I had on Dec. 1, 2012 finally confirmed when Jesus Christ was born as to month and day. This is reliable from historical records and the proof is posted below. I went through the equivalent of like 30 plus volumes of the oldest recognized writings of Christianity up to maybe 400 years after Christ, wrote down massive notes at the end of each book of collected Christian writings for subjects that connected to each other, and finally went back to a note to myself of years ago what might be the key clue to what month and day Jesus was born on. Suddenly the pieces came together into a unified pattern and there was the historical answer staring me in the face. Jesus Christ was actually born on December 25 and historical references show this to be correct. 

     If you want to know what tedious work and takes it seems forever to do, take like a 30 volume set of an encyclopedia, study every report in each volume, write down pertinent notes from each report, and later coordinate these notes to cover various individual subjects you are researching in depth and massive detail. In other words, this took me years to compile and coordinate the notes on early Apostolic Christianity I created by this system. Now I took the note as a guideline I had left myself years ago and back then did not see how to finish this guideline approach with my massive notes. Actually, I had far more than the equivalent of 30 massive volumes of collected early Christian writings. I also had piles of individual books from early Christianity I also researched through for what they really taught in first official Christianity for the first 400 years or so after Christ. I am probably the only Bible scholar in this age, maybe since America was founded in 1776, to use this massive of a method to research the first writings of Christianity in reference to what early Christianity taught the Bible said and taught us to do and believe as Christians in even modern America of 2012.

     One final point. Many years ago, I took a national history test given to top honor students out of American high schools and apparently was rated the top history student that year out of American high schools according to that test. I also won off of it a postgraduate college scholarship in political science while still in high school. I like to go to the prime documents involved with important issues of history and many times have later been confirmed through military intelligence, etc. to have used correctly scientific logic to find the secrets of history hidden in top secret military intelligence records, etc. I have a gift for uncovering the secrets of history!

      First a general comment on many of the early Christian writings for up to 400 A.D. or a little afterwards. A number of our Bible scholars then were better Bible scholars than what I generally see today in modern society. They had patience not being distracted by TV, movies, computers, etc. and devoted as much time as required to totally cover the Bible subject they were writing about. Today, we have quick fix McDonald Hamburgers, and quick, capsule form Bible scholarship which might sound good, but be full of holes once you go back to the original prime documents of Christianity when the same subject was massively covered by the very smart to very brilliant Christian Bible scholars back then. Let me  show you how smart were some of the Bible scholars of Christianity such as Lactantius (A.D. 260-330) in his writing of maybe around 315 A.D. "A Treatise On The Anger Of God." Mohammed of Islam taught as an infallible truth that the earth was flat and you dropped off the edge of the earth if you went too far. Some medieval Catholic scholars around the time of Columbus not having read the early Christian writings also thought the earth was flat. But here is Lactantius around 280-290 years after Christ in a study about the Anger Of God drops in the very smart scientific fact "the earth below as formed into a globe." So he has the earth hanging in space as a large ball the same as modern astronomy says about the earth. There were a number of writings back then about the Camp of the Saints and modern Bible scholars don't know what the Camp of the Saints means today when mentioned in the Bible!

     Okay, it may sound easy when I pull together facts showing that Jesus Christ was actually born December 25 and the only question being what year also. But even the year ends up different than the Pope just suggested in his new book speculating about when and where Jesus was born at. The Pope tries to agree with the conclusions of many Catholic and Protestant scholars and none of them being familiar enough with the early Christian writings frankly miss the mark of historical accuracy. Fortunately, this is not in the area of "infallible teachings" for any of them, but shows lack of knowledge of the early Christian writings for roughly 400 years after Christ. The early Catholic Church of Rome came up with the date of December 25 and later did not know why they came up with this date for the birth of Jesus Christ. In fact, later Catholic scholars suggested they invented this date so Christ could be celebrated in a feast honoring His birth on earth. Nice guess, but wrong answer why this date of December 25 was suddenly suggested by Rome! Showing the lapse of study of the first Christian writings is that

     Okay, let us plunge into the early Christian writings and see what we find once we get serious about finding the month and day Jesus was born on. A background to place the birthday of Jesus Christ in follows. Tertullian around 200 A.D. refers to Jesus born in the 28th year after the death of Cleopatra of Egypt. She died in 30 B.C. That makes Jesus born in either 2 B.C. or else 1 B.C. or else 3 B.C. due to how the stick math of Roman numerals works in reference to rounding off of years, months, and days you start with. Also, Bible scholars thought the early Christian scholars were dumb hicks when they said Jesus was born in the 41st or else 42nd year of the beginning of the reign of Augustus Caesar. Augustus Caesar, proud of being the stepson of Julius Caesar, listed the beginning of his reign  from the reading in 44 B.C.of the Will of Julius Caesar right after the assassination of Caesar by Brutus, etc. They thought this dating of years should have started from when Augustus Caesar was officially declared Roman Emperor of the Roman Empire. They didn't understand how Roman authors around 1,800 years sometimes referred to historical events. 

     Almost all the Bible scholars today both Protestant and Catholic think that Jesus was born around 4 B.C. or earlier to such as 7 B.C. because they do not know or else do not understand correctly the early Christian writings of the first 4 centuries A.D. on dates about Jesus or those close to Him when alive. They read the history of the Jews by Josephus and noticed the reference that Herod died shortly before a lunar eclipse. They looked up astronomical references and thought this meant that Jesus had to be born in 4 B.C. or earlier. Grant Jeffrey did a better job on astronomical records and found that Herod could have died in 1 B.C. or even 1 A.D. and still allowed for Jesus to be born just before Herod the Great died. Even the Pope in the book he just released got fooled by the data used by other Bible scholars The and followed their lead into this mistaken position of Bible scholarship of what years Jesus had to be born in. Many Bible scholars seem to question whether Jesus was born in Bethlehem about 4 miles outside of Jerusalem and the Temple or else at Nazareth. Early Christian writers all said that Jesus was born in Bethlehem.They had access to the history that modern Bible scholars often do not have access to.

      The Teaching Of The Twelve Apostles is often dated as written between 120 A.D. and 160 A.D. For those claiming that Constantine the Great changed the Christian worship service from Saturday to Sunday, this well-known writing of early Christianity in Chapter XIV refers to the weekly worship service on the day of rest which they call the Christian assembly on the Lord's Day which is Sunday. not Saturday. Constitutions of the Holy Apostles which in its seventh book the Bible scholars generally agree is the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles in material Book 5, Section II, "Since we do not permit you so much as on the Lord's day, which are days of joy..." In other words, Sunday is the main worship service for the Christians apparently around 160 A.D. The First Apology Of Justin Martyr (110-165 A.D.), Chapter LX - Weekly Worship of the Christians, "But Sunday is the day on which we all hold our common assembly day of worship." And in Dialogue With Trypho, A Jew, Chapter X - Trypho says to Justin Martyr (around 160 A.D.) against the Christians, "...you observe no festivals or sabbaths,...resting your hopes on a man that was crucified, you yet expect to obtain some good thing from God, while you do not obey His commandments." And Justin said to Trypho: "...we do not observe sabbaths as you do?" Chapter XXIV: "...there is now another covenant, and another law (of Jesus Christ) has gone forth from Zion." And separately, 

     Tertullian (around 200 A.D.) Against Marcion - refers to Col. 2:16, 17 and says, "...The Apostle (Paul) here teaches clearly how it (the law) has been abolished, even by passing from shadow to substance that is, from figurative types to the reality, which is Christ." But the Apostle Paul here also says that Christians wanting it can still have Saturday for their main worship day as well as Sunday if their faith be shakened otherwise not understanding what has happened where the Christians are now under a new covenant under Jesus Christ. And Tertullian "Of The Abolishment Of The Old Law" states, "...that old law has ceased, and now the other, that the promised new law is now in operation." "...repress the old circumcision together with its own sabbath, and announce the new kingdom which is not corruptible." And In "Ad Nations" by Tertullian, Chapter 8, mentions twice that Christians pray on Sunday as their day of rest.

     Why hit so hard on the Sabbath question just before showing the historical Christian writings showing when Jesus Christ was actually born? The Bible scholars pushing the claim that Constantine the Great in the beginning of the 4th century A.D. changed the Christian worship service from Saturday to Sunday obviously have not read seriously the early Christian writings massively reporting the Christians practice the Lord's Day which is Sunday as the main worship service for the day of rest which the Sabbath was set up for originally with the Jews. There are massive explanations by the first Christian writers how Jesus replaced the Old Covenant with the New Covenant and massively quoted from the prophets of the Old Testament showing they prophesied this would happen. The teachings of these mainline Church Fathers of early Christianity are not taught in the churches today which creates confusion and disunity in Christianity where there is no legitimate reason for such issues to divide Christianity over. The Christians can still worship on Saturday if they want, but the Apostles and their first successors probably pushed that Sunday be used as the main worship day for the Christians instead of prior Saturday in order to show that the Christians were under a new covenant under Jesus Christ rather than the old covenant of the Old Testament. Many early Christian writers wrote in great depth how the new covenant under Jesus Christ totally replaced the old covenant of the Old Testament and quoted the early prophets of the Old Testament predicting this would happen. As Jesus once strongly stated, the nation of the earlier kingdom would be replaced by a new nation and people zealous of good works. However, by becoming Christians, Jews regained all the old rights they had under the Old Testament and acquired more rights with God now than Jews had under the Old Testament. 

      I totally agree with Bishop Irenaeus around 170 A.D. that the questions to later arise in Christianity were already answered by referring to the early Christian writings left to the original churches just after Christ and the Apostles which settled the religious questions of this first age of Apostolic Christianity on earth.

      Sorry to embarrass some Bible scholars of today, but if you had seriously studied the early mainline Christian writings left us by the Apostles and their first successors, you would not teach incorrect teachings and doctrines that split Christianity today over invented issues that are not valid. But I also noticed a policy in early Christianity not practiced in Christianity today. Early Church Fathers studied the writings of other very independent Christian thinkers and praised them when they were right on some points and showed their errors when wrong on some points. With everyone too proud to ever admit they made a mistake on one point does not make them necessarily stupid, but let their writings be weighed by public opinion by scholars or else ordinary people and see what remains and what does not remain following careful, sound scholastic evaluation by those with a gift for Bible scholarship. I think Grant Jeffrey was one of our best Christian scholars. Once in a while, I might have spotted one small error in something he wrote, but normally I admired him for all the brilliant, sound answers he provided to advance the cause of Christianity in America and the world. Bishop Fulton J. Sheen was Catholic and I used to listen to him thinking he came up with brilliant subjects that would bless both Catholic and Protestant audiences. Like early Christianity, I listen to all intelligent Christian scholars in America regardless of side they represent.

      I think the Protestants did a much better job of defending Genesis to believe in than the average Catholic scholar of today. Epicurus of Greece came up with the Theory of Evolution several hundred years before Christ and long before Charles Darwin who just revived an ancient Greek theory taught in the early Roman Empire among the elite educated. Epicurus was judged a heretic preaching mass deadly heresy and mass condemned by early Church Fathers. They were wise to condemn him while answering him very effectively back then with smart answers. Karl Marx wrote his doctrinal thesis on Epicurus who inspired him to found Communism to wipe out Christianity in the world with. And Karl Marx dedicated his book of revolution in the name of economics Das Kapital to Charles Darwin claiming it proved Communism was right. And Communism has slaughtered massively across the world since founded. And Adolf Hitler founded Nazism upon the Theory of Evolution to justify it while killing millions. And the secret Satanist society of the Illuminati controlling Obama and many others in Wash., D.C. plans to kill off the entire human race on earth except for maybe 500 million humans left on earth on down to even 20 million humans left on earth but all in the name of "The Theory of Evolution" founded by Epicurus and revived in society by Charles Darwin. 

I judge that the Theory of Evolution first started by Epicurus and then revived by Darwin is the mystery of iniquity (a doctrine of lies) prophesied in II Thessalonians that would bring the Antichrist to power in the Last Days. All these mass murders of humans on earth are again and again done in the name of the Theory of Evolution which is the doctrine of the spirit of Antichrist trying to deny the Bible. It is always played up by those who want to claim the Bible is Myth and not the Word of God starting with Genesis. 

      And as the Christians definitely do not know what first Apostolic Christianity taught in prophecy, etc., early Christianity in their writings stated very bluntly that the Antichrist cannot rise to power until the final authority of the Roman Empire is removed and then the Antichrist arises to power. They said the Apostle Paul orally taught this as the meaning of II Thessalonians 2 as it refers to Roman authority when it says that he (Roman authority) now hinders until he (Roman authority) be taken out of the way.The Apostle Paul had to leave this explanation of II Thessalonians 2 orally with the churches as the ancient Roman Government would have responded with wrath against the churches to destroy them if it knew that the churches were predicting the final end or collapse of the Roman Empire later on.

Those who teach the hinderer is the Holy Ghost, nice guess, but wrong! The Apostle Paul orally left the correct explanation with the churches when he wrote this prophecy for them. And those who say that the Antichrist would be a Roman Emperor, Apostle Paul says you are wrong. The Antichrist will arise from 10 former lands of the Roman Empire, but no legal claim to Roman authority of the Roman Empire.

     I have many early Christian writings explaining what is the Camp of the Saints predicted for our time in Revelation, but cut off from your roots in early Apostolic Christianity by not knowing what the first Christian writings taught, you do not know but the shadow what early Christianity taught as Apostolic Christianity. Early Christianity said bad Christians are rejected by Jesus who were not serious Christians and forced to flee for their lives from the Antichrist. Serious Christians called the "eagle" Christians and "wise virgin Christians," the Tribulation is not your problem. You are to be gathered to Paradise which is an early name for the Garden of Eden. When I come out with my soon book "Our Early Roots Of Apostolic Christianity" by Erasmus of America, I will show you with many surprises such as what they called the most wonderful wife a Christian man could have, and what is the most disastrous wife a man could ever be married to. How you get great rewards for all eternity from Jesus Christ. Or how to blow it and get no rewards for all eternity from Jesus Christ. How to lose your salvation from Christ including taking the number of the beast. The Bible prophecies showing only 10% of mankind may survive the world Tribulation. Different levels of rewards from Christ. I may only print or release this book of early Christianity once. A friend of mine finding out about this book said he was placing the order for this book "Our Early Roots Of Apostolic Christianity. He says he will pay me the price of $25.00 the next time he sees me. I will have many surprises from Apostolic Christianity for those wanting to be total Christians and going all the way. If you want a copy, order fast so I know how many copies to print up or else send in electronic form for email over the internet. According to the early Christian writings, the time is short and the early Christians sounded like they knew what is soon going to happen with us under Obama, etc. If a good volume of interest, we might end up with a Christian government over America soon afterwards,

      I think the Holy Ghost wanted me to have this information above before telling you when Jesus was born in month and day. By the way, early Christianity thought it likely that Jesus will return on the day of His birthday on earth!

     Tertullian, a prominent Church Father, around 200 A.D. wrote that the census records from the taxing still existed in the Imperial Tax Archives recording when Jesus was born in Bethlehem. Other early Church Fathers also mentioned that the census records from the Roman taxing still existed in the archives in Rome. St. John Chrysostom of Constantinople (c. 347-407 A.D.), one of the few most famous and brilliant Christian Patriarchs of Constantinople, suddenly sprung into action after a delegation representing the Eastern Church reported that the census records had been checked at Rome and the date given by the Church at Rome was accurate and Jesus was born on December 25. Year of birth of Jesus is not mentioned in historical accounts about this report, but Chrysostom saw his opening and pushed for establishment of the Feast of the Nativity in the Eastern Church on December 25 as the date the Church at Rome had practiced for some time earlier, but skeptical Constantinople did not follow until independently verified by the census records on Christ left in the Imperial Tax Archives in Rome. Son afterwards, by simple math Rome started the Festival of the Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary on March 25 which is subtracting 6 months from December 25 to get that result. This also matched with results from the 3rd century onward when the Church of the East celebrated the Feast of the Epiphany on January 6. This celebrated when Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist. Jesus by Jewish custom could not be recognized as a religious leader until 30 years old. A few days after Dec. 25 Jesus now goes to John the Baptist who declares recognition of Him as the prophesied Messiah when baptizing Him on January 6. And in late 4th century, the Eastern half of Christianity fixed the feast of the Nativity of John the Baptist on June 24 which matched the timing of when Mary visited her cousin Elizabeth who was now six months pregnant with John the Baptist and jumped in the womb when Mary came with the just conceived Jesus in her womb. 

     I had years ago seen a minor note in astronomy that the pharisees of Israel had for a short time coordinated their Jewish religious calendar (lunar) with the Roman calendar (solar) which they thought had been made more scientifically accurate from the reforms of Julius Caesar, etc. This means if accurate that Dec. 25 on the Roman calendar would have been the 9th month, 25th day on the Jewish religious calendar which is Hanukkah and one of the main religious Temple holidays back in the time of Christ. Many religious pilgrims going to the Temple at Jerusalem would stay at the inn in Bethlehem about 4 miles away from Jerusalem and Temple. Adding taxing time to Rome at the same time would draw a lot of Jew then to "kill two birds with one stone" by doing two required trips into one instead and cheaper to travel that way. The shepherds being merchants would have their flocks of sheep to sell lambs to the traveling pilgrims close by. And I having been in Jerusalem and Bethlehem about two weeks after Christmas one year, the weather was mild and not cold, not mildly cool, which means no problem for Mary to travel there at that time of year contrary to the theory of some Bible scholars. 

      Justin Martyr (110-165 A.D.) had been among those Christian scholars who stated the register of the taxing under Rome show where and when Jesus born. - Refer to The First Apology of Justin, Chapter 34. He said the records were still available in Rome when Justin Martyr was alive.

     Constitutions Of The Holy Apostles written maybe early as 160 A.D. if Book 7 dates the other books used in this collection of early Christian writings being in the same basic time frame of writing, Book 5, Section 3, On Feast Days And Fast Days, "Brethren, observe the festival days, and first of all the birthday (of Jesus) which you are to celebrate on the twenty-fifth of the ninth month (12th month, Dec. 25 on Roman calendar); after which the Epiphany (baptism of Jesus) be to you the most honoured, in which the Lord made to you a display of His own Godhead, and let it take place as the sixth of the tenth month (January 6, Roman calendar);...the fast of Lent is to be observed...before the fast of the Passover, beginning from the second day of the week, and ending as the day of the preparation." This was written apparently by a Jew become Christian convert is why the Jewish religious calendar (lunar) is used for reference instead of the Roman calendar (solar).

     I have fascinating early Apostolic explanations what happens to the "wise virgin Christians" and "the foolish virgin Christians" just before and during the Tribulation, but that will be covered in my book hopefully ready in about 6 to 10 weeks from now. I may only make one printing or release of it so if you want to see many of the key issues that early Apostolic Christianity believed should be shown to all Christians then,  order your reserve copy now so it is planned to be printed for you or else your name on the electronic release of this book once ready electronically as a book to be copied and printed off the internet.  Once ready, "Our Early Roots Of Apostolic Christianity" as a free copy will be sent to John MacHaffie of Nesara News. If he wants to, he can then tell you pro or con what he thinks of it. I cannot predict what all I will show as I just follow the massive notes I have in the early Christian books and see what message comes out from these many early Christian books I have. I try not to compromise on any issue. But it is sad that I could not release my 25 Economic Principles From The Bible to boom the economies of nations. If I had seen strong Christians ready to stand up for Jesus in America, I would have released it in this book. But maybe this book will put conviction and strong moral backbones back into the majority of Christians in America. Then maybe I can release what is about the only thing I have to hold back on key economic principles of Apostolic Christianity.  

      For financial support for the drive to win America back to God or order a reserve copy of the book while orders will be taken, send any money to NIFI at NIFI, P.O. Box 1465, Seneca, SC 29679. Obama wants to be the Antichrist of mankind. This book can turn the tide against him. About February or March, he has very evil plans to finish off America forever. I have secret sources reporting to me from Wash., D.C. and know things I cannot say publicly at this time. If you want, send your email name and address to fastboomamericaneconomy@gmail.com and say "Add To List" for future reports coming from us. Copy and send this report all over America. Early Christianity thought if we knew when to celebrate the Feast of the Nativity on what we now call Christmas in our modern age, we will likely see the return of Jesus to earth on the date of His birthday on earth. So suggested Lactantius around 310 A.D. and he was considered the "Cicero" of Christianity then in speeches and writings for Christianity. He also was the tutor to Crispus who was the son of Constantine the Great, the Roman Emperor who legalized Christianity and sponsored the Nicene Council where they, not him, wrote the Nicene Creed stating the basic teachings of Apostolic Christianity according to the Church Fathers of Christianity then.

     Yours for God and Country, Erasmus of America (pen name for the one Christian leader in America seriously standing for the return of total Apostolic Christianity to the churches which have but a shadow understanding of what Apostolic Christianity was for the first four centuries of Christianity. Time for the churches to stop compromises and land back into total Apostolic Christianity for our churches today. We need to take back the thinking and spirit of the Apostles of Jesus Christ which we call the serious historical Apostolic Christianity of first Christianity as recorded in the first Church Father writings of Christianity. Time for the Bride Church to get prepared for the soon return of Jesus Christ to this earth coming for His "wise virgin Christians" looking for Him. The Roman Catholic Church and Greek Orthodox Church validly trace to the Apostles, but time to get the mentality and spirit of first Christianity back into them. And if Protestants want to reform back to first Apostolic Christianity, we are the way to do it with honor before Christ.)