Saturday, March 9, 2013

The federal government has no clothes


This information, if accepted, could cause serious shifts in power.
I plan on authoring a version more easily understood by those who have never learned legal terms. In the meantime, I really want to get this info out and let it grow on its own.
The bottom line... The US Congress is strictly limited in power unless you live on federal land. On federal land, Congress may pass any law they want WITHOUT LIMITATIONS.
If you live on federal land (Washington, DC) you must obey any law passed by Congress.
There are no limits on what Congress can tell DC citizens to do, except possibly, the bill of rights. If you do not live on, and weren't born on federal land, most federal laws do not apply to you.
All "unconstitutional" laws written by the US Congress apply to "US Citizens". The 14th amendment defines exactly who is a US citizen. Guess what? The commonly accepted meme for this definition is exactly backwards. Most people are NOT US Citizens.

The proof follows:

Please spread this info far and wide (anonymously). Even Supreme court decisions can be overturned with this info if it has enough popular support. Think "the emperor has no clothes.


I'll start with my conclusion: According to the 14th amendment most people are not citizens of the United States (federal government).
Examine the 14th amendment.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdictionthereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

The words "born or naturalized" and "subject to the jurisdiction" are linked with the word  "and". In legal language, both must be true for any text that follows (are citizens of the United States).
I was born in Mississippi on land not owned by the federal government.The land was not "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" of the federal government, so the 14th amendment does not make me a US Citizen.

Why? I did not meet the "jurisdiction" requirement imposed by the word "and".
Your situation is probably the same.  People who are not United States Citizens are:
Those born or naturalized outside federally owned land.
The 14th amendment positively identifies those who must be United States Citizens but makes no statement about who is not a US Citizen.To be a US citizen, you must be born on federally owned land to be under the jurisdiction of Congress. If you are not under the jurisdiction of Congress when born or naturalized, you are not a citizen of the United States by virtue of the 14th amendment.
Here's my legal argument based on the Constitution itself.
Point 1: 
The term "and subject to the jurisdiction  thereof" absolutely proves the term "United States" refers to a government, not geography. Only a government can have jurisdiction. A "land mass" cannot have jurisdiction, since a land mass cannot write laws. Only governments write law.
Point 2:
The jurisdiction of the federal government, termed the "United States" is defined inArticle 1, Section 8, clause 17 of the Constitution.(No other place in the Constitution gives the federal government geographic jurisdiction. All other jurisdiction is limited to "granted powers" in clauses 1-16). 
Here's clause 17 from Article 1, Section 8. It is the only geographically defined jurisdiction in the Constitution...
"To exercise exclusive Legislation (jurisdiction) in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;"
If you weren't  born in Washington, D.C., federally managed territories (Puerto Rico, Guam, Samoa) or federally owned land (purchased from the States), the 14th amendment does not say  you are a United States Citizen.  
We can call ourselves "citizens of the United States of America", but that term doesn't imply jurisdiction. It's just a description of the Republic we were born into.
Again... a "land mass" does not write laws, so there is no "jurisdiction" implied by "United States of America". A land mass is not a government, and can pass no laws.




This gives us a clear rule to apply:
Laws written for "US Citizens" or "Citizens of the United States" do not apply to those born on land outside the geographical jurisdiction of the government called the "United States" (which is really the US Congress, since only they can write law). 
The geographic jurisdiction of the United States is Washington D.C. and  federally owned land, per the US Constitution. 
Any law written for US Citizens only applies to 14th amendment US Citizens, since this is the only place such citizenship is defined. The only exceptions to this are laws written to carry out Constitutionally granted powers like coining money and building postal roads. See Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution for a complete list. 


Even these laws are not enforceable if the law is overreaching to carry out a Constitutional duty. See the definition of necessary and proper.
This also solves the "Anchor baby" immigration problem.  If you aren't born on federal land, you are NOT a US Citizen.Illegal immigrant children could be a citizen of the State they were born in, but ONLY if both Congress sets that immigration rule, and the state is willing to grant citizenship as well.


Rebuttals  to popular claims against my arguments:
Aren't the several states in United States 'territory'?
Yes, but the 14th amendment is based on jurisdiction, not territory.
Isn't everyone under federal jurisdiction for Constitutionally granted powers of Congress?
If the 14th amendment omitted "in the United States", then only vague jurisdiction would apply. "in the United States" specifically refers to geography.  Since you must meet both the geographic and jurisdictional requirements of the 14th amendment, a simple test of jurisdiction doesn't make you a US Citizen.
Can Congress write laws to make you a citizen of the United States?
No law written by Congress can make you a US Citizen because any such law would be changing the jurisdiction defined in Article 1, Section 8, clause 17 of the Constitution. Congress can't change the Constitution by passing a law.  Redefining the Constitution requires an Amendment.


8 comments:

Anonymous said...

TITLE 26 > Subtitle C > CHAPTER 21 > Subchapter C > § 3121
Prev | Next

§ 3121. Definitions
(e) State, United States, and citizen
For purposes of this chapter—
(1) State
The term “State” includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.
(2) United States
The term “United States” when used in a geographical sense includes the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.
An individual who is a citizen of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (but not otherwise a citizen of the United States) shall be considered, for purposes of this section, as a citizen of the United States.

Anonymous said...

Yes, this is true. However through deception and fraud we have all claimed to be US citizens on many gov documents, such as voter registration, passports, birth certificates, driver's licenses, etc. thus accepting jurisdiction under the US Federal Corporation.

learnfromhistory said...

Actually when they created the Constitution of 1871 first of all it was not lawfully ratified as the south voted by gunpoint (source 1967 congressional archives) AND The constitution they wrote themselves only gave them jurisdiction in 10 square miles D.C. ONLY. The state governments are guilty of allowing an invasion and occupation of our states by the feds. State municipalities i.e. local governments have been hoarding taxpayer funds (source CAFR funds). Do the math of those funds and every year there is a huge surplus. After the year 2011 for example if you add the total after all bills were paid in all states there was a surplus of 51 trillion dollars and this information is quite public. States are not broke they want us to think they are. So the state leaderships are just as guilty as the feds.

Anonymous said...

My daughter was able to obtain a US passport where on the application she stated that she was NOT a 14th amendment citizen and received her passport.
However about 6months to a year later, my wife and I did the same thing and the secretary of state refused to issue to passports and I lost my $ applying. Still have no passports because they force you into their jurisdiction. Any ideas anyone?

Anonymous said...

IT WAS ONLY BECAUSE THE TRUTH WAS NOT TOLD THAT THIS HAPPENED.... THERE IS NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS SAYING WE HAVE ONLY A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIME TO THROW THE AHOS OUT... SO EVICT THEM .....JUST LIKE THEIR GANGSTER BANKERS ARE DOING TO US.... THERE ARE IN THE QUDARILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN THE CAFR FUNDS IF YOU ADD ALL THE STATES TOGETHER. THEY HAVE MONIES THAT THEY HAVE BEEN USING ON PRIVATE PLACEMENT PROGRAMS TO CREATE A SUPER AMOUNT OF WEALTH.... OUR GOVERNMENT NEEDS AS MY MECHANIC SAID A COMPLETE OVERHAUL....

Anonymous said...

The government may not have clothes but it still has teeth. Time to pull the teeth out of a rabid dog.

Anonymous said...

HEY ! A CROWD OF HOPEFULLY SEVERAL MILLION ARE GOING TO D.C. ON APRIL 20TH AND CALL OUT ALL THE RATS AND TELL THEM THEY ARE UNDER ARREST ! IF THEY DON'T SUBMIT AND COME OUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE GOING IN AFTER THEM AND ARREST THEM IN CONGRESS, SENATE, WHITE HOUSE, FEDERAL RESERVE ! THEY ARE HOPING TO HAVE MILITARY AND POLICE BACKUP.... GO HERE TO SEE....http://globalmutiny.blogspot.com/

Anonymous said...

I really love this post and these comments ... sooooo very grateful from depths of my
Soul that this truth is being told …

Though it will take some dividing and separation starting from the core of this great American Nation to set matters right … yet “IF” Americans do not become legally organized and get a foot hold for development … American’s freedom from the US will be as it was when the wandering slaves in history were first freed from ownership of their bondage holders …

Because through years of trickery deceptions and manipulation …. the United States as is, had gain control over most all American jobs, American benefits, American land and the American Mother Earth’s resources … and did so as to make Americans dependant on their US money system … and systematically genocide the people over a period of time …

Nevertheless … these separation procedures must be done in decency and in order from the core .. and aimed at taking back what belongs to the American people …. so the American people whom are Loved by the Mother Earth and the CREATOR … can stand dependant from the United States corporation which have been set-up on America soil … and be strong once again …

And that goal is now plausible because the truth is coming out and eyes are opening …. I am American …. and I Love America … and I Love the many diversities of goodly people whom have come to be Americans by many different means … to Lovingly and peaceably reside on American soil …