Monday, December 9, 2013

Growing concerns over the growing power of the presidency

Video
|
Sun, 8 Dec 2013
THIS VERY INTERESTING HEARING ON THE HILL THIS WEEK ..... SOMETHING DURING THIS HEARING , WHICH IS WHY THE REGULATORY ..... AND THERE'S NO CHECK ON THEM. >> SHANNON ..... AS JON MENTIONED, OBAMA CARE. THOSE LAWS WERE PROBABLY 10 % PRESCRIPTED BY CONGRESS
hearing obama found at 3:38
“…THE LAW IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, I'M NOT GOING TO SIGN IT AND SIGNING OBAMA CARE ONLY TO DISCOVER THAT THERE ARE PROBLEMS WITH IT AND THEN YOU DECIDE WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL ACTION THAT YOU'RE GOING TO UNILATERALLY NOT ENFORCE PROVISIONS. SO THERE'S A DIFFERENCE AND YOU CAN'T GO TO COURT BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE STANDING. >> WE WERE DISCUSSING THIS VERY INTERESTING HEARING ON THE HILL THIS WEEK. A NUMBER OF THE ELECTED MEMBERS SAID BECAUSE OF CURRENT LEGAL PRECEDENT THEY DON'T HAVE STANDING. THEY DON'T HAVE A WAY AS A PLAINTIFF TO GO TO COURT AND SAY THEY WANT TO SUE THE EXECUTIVE COURT OVER THESE ISSUES. SENATOR BAYH, YOU TALKED ABOUT SOMETHING DURING THIS HEARING WHICH IS WHY THE REGULATORY BRANCHS AND JONATHAN TURLEY, SAID IT'S ALSO LIKE THE RISE OF THE FOURTH BRANCH THAT THE FOUNDERS NEVER INTENDED BUT THE FEDERAL AGENCY HAVE SO MUCH POWER TO CARRY OUT IN TANDEM WITH THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH THINGS THAT THE PRESIDENT WOULD LIKE TO GET DONE AND THERE'S NO CHECK ON THEM. >> SHANNON, THAT'S EXACTLY RIGHT. ANY PRESIDENT THAT IS GOING TO USE THAT REGULATORY POWER TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT THEY CAN OTHERWISE THEIR ELECTION HAS NOT MEANT ANYTHING. SO LET'S TAKE THE DODD/FRANK BILL, REGULATING THE FINANCIAL SERVICES OR, AS JON MENTIONED, OBAMA CARE. THOSE LAWS WERE PROBABLY 10 PRESCRIPTED BY CONGRESS, YOU WILL DO THIS AND YOU WON'T DO THAT AND THAT, BY DEFINITION, IS CONGRESS HANDING OVER THE REGULATORYHEARING ON LAW IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, I'M NOT GOING TO SIGN IT AND SIGNING OBAMA CARE ONLY TO DISCOVER THAT THERE ARE PROBLEMS WITH IT AND THEN YOU DECIDE WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL ACTION THAT YOU'RE GOING TO UNILATERALLY NOT ENFORCE PROVISIONS. SO THERE'S A DIFFERENCE AND YOU CAN'T GO TO COURT BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE STANDING. >> WE WERE DISCUSSING THIS VERY INTERESTING HEARING ON THE HILL THIS WEEK. A NUMBER OF THE ELECTED MEMBERS SAID BECAUSE OF CURRENT LEGAL PRECEDENT THEY DON'T HAVE STANDING. THEY DON'T HAVE A WAY AS A PLAINTIFF TO GO TO COURT AND SAY THEY WANT TO SUE THE EXECUTIVE COURT OVER THESE ISSUES. SENATOR BAYH, YOU TALKED ABOUT SOMETHING DURING THIS HEARING WHICH IS WHY THE REGULATORY BRANCHS AND JONATHAN TURLEY, SAID IT'S ALSO LIKE THE RISE OF THE FOURTH BRANCH THAT THE FOUNDERS NEVER INTENDED BUT THE FEDERAL AGENCY HAVE SO MUCH POWER TO CARRY OUT IN TANDEM WITH THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH THINGS THAT THE PRESIDENT WOULD LIKE TO GET DONE AND THERE'S NO CHECK ON THEM. >> SHANNON, THAT'S EXACTLY RIGHT. ANY PRESIDENT THAT IS GOING TO USE THAT REGULATORY POWER TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT THEY CAN OTHERWISE THEIR ELECTION HAS NOT MEANT ANYTHING. SO LET'S TAKE THE DODD/FRANK BILL, REGULATING THE FINANCIAL SERVICES OR, AS JON MENTIONED, OBAMA CARE. THOSE LAWS WERE PROBABLY 10 PRESCRIPTED BY CONGRESS, YOU WILL DO THIS AND YOU WON'T DO THAT AND THAT, BY DEFINITION, IS CONGRESS HANDING OVER THE REGULATORY …”

No comments: