more patological lying by Obama:
Iran will get 20 billion, not 5-7 as reported before, while Iran continues
enriching Uranium and buildng ballistic missiles.
AWFUL!
Obama Administration Admits Iran Will Get $20 Billion from Sanctions Relief –
Not $7 Billion
Posted on | December 10, 2013
more tampering with my computers
and my web site. Temporarily I do not have access to document library and I am
unable to attach PDF files to posts. I reported this to my provider and another
tech support person and I hope it will be resolved soon
Posted on | December 10, 2013
Press release: Obama files yet
another request for more time to answer to the Appeal filed by Attorney Taitz
on behalf of several minor presidential candidates
Posted on | December 10, 2013
13-16359
James Grinols, et al v. Electoral College, et al “File a Motion”
|
Inbox
|
x
|
|
|
2:26
PM (0 minutes ago)
 |
|
||
|
||||
United
States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit
Notice of Docket Activity
The following transaction was entered on
12/10/2013 at 2:26:46 PM PST and filed on 12/10/2013|
Case
Name:
|
James
Grinols, et al v. Electoral College, et al
|
|
Case
Number:
|
|
|
Document(s):
|
Filed (ECF) Appellees Electoral College, Barack Obama, President of the Senate and U.S. Congress Motion to extend time to file Answering brief until 01/29/2014 at 11:59 pm. Date of service: 12/10/2013. [8896180] (EAO)
Notice will be electronically mailed to:
Mr. Edward Alan Olsen, Assistant U.S. Attorney
George Michael Waters
Doctor Orly Taitz, Counsel
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document Description: Appellees’ Motion for a 30 day Extension in Which to File Answering Brief
Original Filename: ninth circuit motion for extension of time (3).pdf
Electronic Document Stamp:
[STAMP acecfStamp_ID=1106763461 [Date=12/10/2013] [FileNumber=8896180-0] [
Motion to for Judge Lamberth to
recuse himself, which was submitted on 12.02.2013, was delivered to the USDC,
however the clerks do not docket it. Please, call the court and ask to expedite
docketing of the motion to recuse Judge Lamberth in Taitz v Donahoe and
Williams, dealing with the cover up by the USPS of Obama’s use of a fabricated
cancellation postal stamp on his fabricated Selective Service registration
Posted on | December 10, 2013
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ In her capacity as the President of
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603
E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com, orly.taitz@gmail.co
UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE §
Plaintiff, §
§
v. §
§
Patrick Donahoe, Postmaster General, §
David C. Williams, Inspector General §
for the United States Postal Service §
Respondent §
MOTION
TO RECUSE UNDER 28 USC 455
Plaintiff herein, Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
respectfully requests honorable Royce Lamberth to recuse himself as a presiding
judge in the case at hand and transfer the case to another judge.28 USC 455 and precedent of Marshall v Jarrico 446 U.S. 238, 242, 100 S. Ct. 161, 642 Ed 2d 182 (1980) will provide for such recusal.
The case at hand deals with the refusal by the Postmaster General and Inspector General for the USPS to provide records under FOIA 5 US 552 Freedom of Information act. The records that are requested relate to a flagrantly forged Selective Service registration of Barack Obama and a flagrantly forged USPS cancellation stamp affixed to it. Fabricated stamp is so laughable that it looks like it was concocted by a mentally challenged five year old or a forger who is legally blind. Sworn affidavit of a former Chief Investigator of the US Coast Guard confirms that the document is altered.
At issue is the fact that this court showed bias in prior relating cases and the plaintiff is fairly sure that this court will show the same bias in the case at hand.
In the prior case of Taitz v Astrue 11-cv-402 plaintiff provided the court with undeniable legal, competent evidence of Obama using a stolen Social Security number of a resident of Connecticut born in 1890.
In spite of the fact that the plaintiff provided the court with all the evidence that Obama and the Social Security Administration defrauded the court and the nation and improperly withheld the SS-5 application which it was obligated to release, this court chose to ignore all the evidence and to cover it all up. By doing so this court showed bias against the plaintiff and against every US citizen for this matter and in favor of Barack Obama who stole the franchise of the US President with stolen and fabricated IDs.
It is clear that this court will continue showing the same bias in the case at hand and will cover up all evidence of Obama defrauding the nation and of the top governmental officials committing treason and being criminally complicit in the cover up and as such the plaintiff respectfully asks this court to recuse itself and transfer the case to another judge.
Moreover, in this case the defense did not furnish an answer or responsive pleadings for four months, while the defense was served by certified mail and admitted receiving the complaint and summons at DOJ by certified mail. The clerk in charge of all of the receipts of complaints received by certified mail has signed the receipt and Plaintiff provided his signed receipt and similar receipts for other cases, which were signed by the same clerk, Eddy Hase. In his sworn declaration Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel VanHorn admitted to being contacted by this court in regards to lack of an answer to complaint. Such contact by the court represents an impermissible ex-parte communication by the court with the party and it by itself requires Judge Lamberth to recuse himself from the case and transfer the case to another judge, who did not engage in impermissible ex-parte communications with the defense in order to assist the defense and in order not to issue a default judgment for the plaintiff that this court was obligated to issue.
Further, Plaintiff demanded an administrative hearing with the clerk of the DOJ Eddy Hase in order to ascertain whether someone at DOJ told this clerk to “misplace” or destroy the complaint, which was received in July of 2013. The court ignored all evidence of the complaint disappearing at the DOJ, as well as all the evidence in prior cases. This comes on the heels of James Rosen case, where this court allowed spying on FOX reporter James Rosen and even his parents based on a perjured affidavit and kept this subpoena improperly sealed for over a year. Thus, there is a pattern of this court being biased in favor of Obama and his regime, in spite of any and all crimes committed by Obama and his regime against American citizens, and this court shows bias against dissidents and whistleblowers, who blew the whistle on Obama and his regime.
Further on, such transfer of the case is in the best interest of the public at large and the time is of the essence. U.S. citizens deserve better than a thief, who is usurping the U.S. Presidency with a stolen Social Security number and fabricated IDs. National Security and the interests of the U.S. military require release of the records in question and require an end to the cover up. As such, recusal by this court is justified, essential and in the public interest.
Respectfully,
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE §13-cv-1020
Plaintiff, v §
Patrick Donahoe, David Williams § Honorable Royce Lamberth
Respondent
Certificate of service
I, Lila Dubert, am not a party to the above captioned case, I am over 18 years old and I attest that I served the defendant with attached pleadings by mailing them via first class mail on 12.02.2013 the pleadings attached herein by first class mail to the address of the attorney for the defendant:
US Attorneys’ office
555 Fourth str. NW
Washington DC 20530
Lila Dubert
will
the judge order a priest to perform a wedding ceremony for a gay couple?
Posted on | December 10, 2013 | 6
Comments
a judge in Colorado ordered a baker to
serve gay couples and produce wedding cakes for them, even though it is against
the religious believes of the baker and even though gay marriages are banned in
Colorado.What if tomorrow a priest will refuse to perform a gay ceremony? Will a priest be forced to do so by a judge or will he face penalties and jail for refusing to follow the order of the judge?
What if a Muslim family asks a baker to make a cake for a man and four women getting married, because according to muslim religion a man can marry 4 wives?
Are there situations like these in California and other states? If there are, please, contact me at 949-683-5411 or orly.taitz@hushmail.com
Judge Orders Wedding Cake Baker To Serve Gay Couples…
this needs to be heard by juries of our piers and not by judges who are often politically motivated and do not really represent the people of this nation. we have a judicial tyranny which propes the regime. It is time for the public to regain its’ voice
Steve
Stockman is challenging John cornyn for US Senate. so far they both were full
of empty talk and hot air. Demand action from them, demand they submit to the
judiciary committee actual proposed articles of impeachment based on Obama’s
use of bogus IDs and other acts of fraud. If they don’t put their money where
their mouth is, they are equally worthless
Posted on | December 10, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment