Obama resignation or arrest, Douglas Vogt McInnish V Chapman Paige V Vermont US Supreme Court cases, Arpaio Zullo investigation results, Obama not natural born citizen?, Treasonous activities by Obama et al

Posted on March 28, 2014 | 51 Comments

Obama resignation or arrest, Douglas Vogt McInnish V Chapman Paige V Vermont US Supreme Court cases, Arpaio Zullo investigation results, Obama not natural born citizen?, Treasonous activities by Obama et al
“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense, to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells
“Moore said he’s seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” and a lot of evidence that suggests he is not.”…Judge Roy Moore interview by WND
“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the
constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no
rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be
inspected by him?”… Marbury versus Madison
It does indeed look like the chickens are coming home to roost.
High profile individuals such as Barrister Michael Shrimpton believe that Obama should resign.
Will Obama resign before he is arrested ?
There is too much evidence that Obama was not born in the US and zero evidence that proves he was.
Up to and beyond early 2008 there is numerous compelling circumstantial evidence that Obama was born in Kenya.
The stakes have gotten much higher.
It is no longer just a matter of Obama being removed from office.
Apparently treason and treasonous activities have been engaged in by the Obama camp.
From MMD Newswire March 28, 2014.
“Compelling Evidence of the Forgery of Obama’s Birth Certificate Lodged with the United States Supreme Court, Case No.: 13-1158″
“Douglas Vogt has lodged with the United States Supreme Court his compelling forensic evidence that the Birth Certificate of Barack Hussein Obama, II is indisputably a forgery.
That forensic evidence is contained in Vogt’s 95 page Public and 75 page Sealed Affidavits. Barack Hussein Obama, II – at his White House Press Conference on April 27, 2011 – released his Birth Certificate to prove that he was Constitutionally-eligible to be President. The lodging of the Affidavits accompanied Vogt’s filing of a Petition for Certiorari with the Supreme Court which has been assigned Case No: 13-1158. That Petition seeks review of the refusal of the Federal District Court to refer Vogt’s Affidavits to a federal Grand Jury as required by Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 6(a).
Rule 6(a) states: “When the public interest so requires, the court must order that one or more grand juries be summoned.” Vogt’s Petition argues that there can be no higher “public interest” than the issue of whether Barack Hussein Obama, II, has foisted a forged Birth Certificate upon the Citizens of the United States. Accordingly, the Petition argues, the lower federal court has breached its Congressionally-imposed duty to “summon” a Grand Jury to hear Vogt’s well-founded, forensic proof of the forgery of Obama’s Birth Certificate.”
Read more:
http://mmdnewswire.com/forgery-of-obama-birth-certificate-130521.html
From the US Supreme Court.

No. 13-1158

Title:

Douglas Vogt, Petitioner

United States District Court for the Western District of Washington

Docketed:

March 24, 2014

Lower Ct:

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Nos.:	(13-74137)
Decision Date:	January 14, 2014

~~~Date~~~	~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mar 24 2014	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 23, 2014)
Mar 24 2014	Motion to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari and for leave to file an affidavit under seal filed by petitioner.
Mar 26 2014	Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 18, 2014.

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~	~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~	~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Douglas Vogt	12819 S.E. 38th Street	(425) 643-1131
	Suite 115
	Bellevue, WA 98006
Party name: Douglas Vogt

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/13-1158.htm
We expect McInnish V Chapman to be sent to the SCOTUS.
The opinions from the Alabama Supreme Court are significant for 2 important reasons.
Chief Justice Roy Moore in his extensive dissenting opinion made the strong case that the secretary of state, once confronted by a potential deficiency in a presidential candidate’s qualifications, has a duty to investigate.
Justice Parker, also dissenting, stated that there are reasons to suspect Obama’s eligibility.
“McInnish attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates of President Obama that have been made
public.”
H. Brooke Paige has a case before the SCOTUS challenging Obama’s eligibility as a natural born citizen because Obama’s father was Kenyan and therefore British.
And of course we are awaiting the news conference from Mike Zullo regarding the Arpaio Zullo investigation into Obama’s records.
Something’s gotta give