Obama Regime Beheading Horror Stuns Russia

August 25, 2014

Obama Regime Beheading Horror Stuns Russia

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

A wide ranging Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that Russian diplomats at the United Nations (UN) this past week were “stunned” after the Obama regime refused to intervene with Saudi Arabia to stop the horrifying beheadings of 19 people during the past fortnight, while at the same time using the “fake” beheading of an American reporter to justify a new Middle Eastern war.

According to this report, during one of last weeks UN Security Council meetings, of which the Federation and the US are permanent members of, Russian diplomats attempted to put on the “agenda for immediate consideration” a number of resolutions which included: 1.) An immediate ceasefire in the Israeli-Gaza conflict; 2.) An immediate order to Ukraine to turn over all evidence and materials related to the Malaysian Airline disaster; 3.) An immediate ceasefire in the Ukrainian conflict for humanitarian reasons; and 4.) An immediate resolution calling on Saudi Arabia to immediately halt its barbaric beheading of nominally innocent peoples.

Most astoundingly, this report continues, the Obama regime blocked all of these proposed resolutions by forbidding any of them to be discussed in either open or closed sessions leading to a sharp rebuke from the MoFA which, in part, stated:

“If the US opposes an absolutely non-confrontational, reconciliatory text, there can be no doubts that Washington intends to have the armed confrontation in Ukraine [and other regions] continued. It could be seen only as an attempt to ‘undermine’ humanitarian mission(s).

Cynical disregard for the fate of civilians and 'couldn't care less' attitude toward the international humanitarian law when it comes to geopolitical interests, becomes the core of the policy of the United States and its European satellites…

More and more questions are being raised about the ability of the current US administration to participate in the development of realistic and pragmatic approaches to international problems, to adequately assess the situation in the various regions of the world.”

Cited as an example of the Obama regimes “cynical disregard for the fate of civilians and ‘couldn't care less' attitude toward the international humanitarian law when it comes to geopolitical interests”, this report details, was the fate of 19 human beings beheaded by Saudi Arabia since 4 August, eight of whom were executed for nonviolent offenses, seven for drug smuggling and one for sorcery, none of whom the US (or its EU allies) would defend.

Important to note, this report continues, is that the Obama regimes failure to stop the beheadings of these 19 human beings this past fortnight follows their actions this past June when they allowed the beheading executions of 175 homosexual men and women in Saudi Arabia, an action which, likewise, stunned the MoFA.

Most outrageous about the Obama regime in regards to these beheadings however, MoFA experts in this report note, was at the exact same time Saudi Arabia was carrying them out, the US and its EU allies were decrying the “alleged” beheading of an American freelance journalist and photojournalist named James Foley by Islamic State (IS) [commonly referred to by Western media sources as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS)] forces in Syria.

Although this report doesn’t provide any evidence relating to the true cause of Foley’s death, it does note that many independent analysts in the US have concluded that his beheading video was “faked”, and as one such analysis points out:

1.) The knife his captor uses could no more sever a head than my little finger could punch a hole in the Hoover Dam. It is far too small….and far too small to have produced the cleanly-guillotined appearance of head and body at the end of the film.

2.) The universally advertised ‘gruesome gore’ has been hugely overdone by the media. There is no blood at all in the movie action…and that’s precisely when the director cuts. But I don’t believe the knifeman cuts anything.

3.) We see (very briefly) knifeman sawing away at Mr Foley’s neck – but zero blood. That is medically impossible: when you sever the left and right common carotid arteries, the spray of huge volumes of blood is quite incredible. That’s probably why we cut to a still of head and body at the end.

4.) If James Foley has been beheaded (and the closing still shot looks real enough to me) then he certainly was not killed at the spot and with that implement. Again, there simply isn’t enough blood.

Not just independent US analysts have come to that conclusion either, and as we can further read, in part, as reported by the Infowars News Service:

“Confirming Infowars’ analysis on Thursday, British forensic experts have concluded that the ISIS beheading video involving James Foley was in all likelihood staged using “camera trickery and slick post-production techniques.”

An international forensic science company which does work for police forces across Britain found that, “James Foley’s execution may have been staged, with the actual murder taking place off-camera,” reports the Telegraph.

The experts noted that despite Foley’s executioner appearing to draw a knife across the neck area at least six times, no blood is seen. The video itself does not show the actual beheading, merely a still image which purports to show Foley’s decapitated head resting on his body.”

As to why the Obama regime would ignore Saudi Arabia’s brutal beheadings of 19 human beings, while at the same time using Foley’s “alleged” beheading as a justification for war, MoFA experts in this report grimly note, can be explained by simply looking at two maps: 1.) The proposed Saudi-Qatar natural gas pipeline through Iraq and Syria to be built by British Petroleum (BP) [photo 3^rd left]; and 2.) The area controlled by IS forces in Iraq and Syria [photo bottom left], which “amazingly” are nearly identical.

In fact, according to former French foreign minister Roland Dumas, Britain had planned covert action in Syria as early as 2009 to secure the path for this pipeline: “I was in England two years before the violence in Syria on other business”, he told French television: “I met with top British officials, who confessed to me that they were preparing something in Syria. This was in Britain not in America. Britain was preparing gunmen to invade Syria.”

This MoFA report further notes that the strategy currently at play was candidly described in a 2008 US Army-funded RAND report opposed by Obama, but supported by Britain titled: Unfolding the Future of the Long War which noted that “the economies of the industrialized states will continue to rely heavily on oil, thus making it a strategically important resource.” As most oil will be produced in the Middle East, the US has “motive for maintaining stability in and good relations with Middle Eastern states”:

“The geographic area of proven oil reserves coincides with the power base of much of the Salafi-jihadist network. This creates a linkage between oil supplies and the long war that is not easily broken or simply characterized... For the foreseeable future, world oil production growth and total output will be dominated by Persian Gulf resources... The region will therefore remain a strategic priority, and this priority will interact strongly with that of prosecuting the long war.”

In this context, the report identified several potential trajectories for regional policy focused on protecting access to Gulf oil supplies, among which the following are most salient:

“Divide and Rule focuses on exploiting fault lines between the various Salafi-jihadist groups to turn them against each other and dissipate their energy on internal conflicts. This strategy relies heavily on covert action, information operations (IO), unconventional warfare, and support to indigenous security forces... the United States and its local allies could use the nationalist jihadists to launch proxy IO campaigns to discredit the transnational jihadists in the eyes of the local populace... US leaders could also choose to capitalize on the 'Sustained Shia-Sunni Conflict' trajectory by taking the side of the conservative Sunni regimes against Shiite empowerment movements in the Muslim world.... possibly supporting authoritative Sunni governments against a continuingly hostile Iran.”

Most perplexing to MoFA analysts contributing to this report is if Obama is even in control of his own government, or if the US is simply being used by the British to further their Middle Eastern aims utilizing America power through its military forces and intelligence agencies whose interests appear to align closer to the UK than their own President.

Though not conclusive, this report does grimly note that IS forces currently operating in Iraq and Syria are being funded by the US, Saudi Arabia and Israel and that the American agenda towards another Middle Eastern war is increasingly being “masterminded” by the US media…one of whose major outlets, NBC News, has been taken over by UK intelligence operative John Toker, who currently is the Director of Communications for Security and Intelligence for the British government, and whose British journalist wife, Deborah Turness, is now President of NBC News.

And to the British governments true feelings towards Obama, this MoFA report concludes, was seen this past weekend when the British Embassy in Washington D.C. held a “White House Barbeque” to celebrate the 24 August 1814 burning of the White House and Capitol during the War of 1812 by British forces…one of the worst attacks against America and its citizens in its entire history.

August 25, 2014 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

[Ed. Note: Western governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagrees with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth. Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ against us has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit and which is addressed in the report “Who Is Sorcha Faal?”.]