Wyoming School Tells Students They Can Only Pray in Private — Here’s How Well That Went Over
Do students need permission to pray? The principal of a Wyoming school thought so, until she was confronted with the First Amendment.
Back in October, a group of Glendo High School students gathered to pray out loud for their meal during lunch. Afterwards, Stanetta Twiford, the school’s principal, said “enough,” accusing students of forcing their religion on others.
Twiford apparently took issue with the public nature of the prayer and allegedly told the students that they would be allowed to pray in private, in the hallway or gymnasium, with permission.
The principal stood by the rule, even after the parent of three of the students confronted her and District Superintendent Dennis Fischer. Using information they claimed to have read from the American Civil Liberties Union, the two administrators asserted that the Constitution prohibits the prayer, as students witnessing it were a “captive audience.”
After hearing this, the parents of two other students took their complaints to the Alliance Defending Freedom, a legal group known for defending Christians in cases like this. The ADF responded with a letter to the district on Dec. 4, threatening to take legal action if the ban persisted.
“School cafeterias are not religion-free zones, and they certainly do not involve captive audiences,” the ADF letter stated. “Students in the cafeteria are not captive audiences because they can leave at any time or turn away from the quiet prayer in the corner. … Further, students in the cafeteria are no more a captive audience than students in the hallway or students on a playground.”
The ADF informed Twiford and Fischer that non-disruptive speech occurring during “non-instructional time” must be allowed and that the Supreme Court agrees on this point.
Back in October, a group of Glendo High School students gathered to pray out loud for their meal during lunch. Afterwards, Stanetta Twiford, the school’s principal, said “enough,” accusing students of forcing their religion on others.
Twiford apparently took issue with the public nature of the prayer and allegedly told the students that they would be allowed to pray in private, in the hallway or gymnasium, with permission.
The principal stood by the rule, even after the parent of three of the students confronted her and District Superintendent Dennis Fischer. Using information they claimed to have read from the American Civil Liberties Union, the two administrators asserted that the Constitution prohibits the prayer, as students witnessing it were a “captive audience.”
After hearing this, the parents of two other students took their complaints to the Alliance Defending Freedom, a legal group known for defending Christians in cases like this. The ADF responded with a letter to the district on Dec. 4, threatening to take legal action if the ban persisted.
“School cafeterias are not religion-free zones, and they certainly do not involve captive audiences,” the ADF letter stated. “Students in the cafeteria are not captive audiences because they can leave at any time or turn away from the quiet prayer in the corner. … Further, students in the cafeteria are no more a captive audience than students in the hallway or students on a playground.”
The ADF informed Twiford and Fischer that non-disruptive speech occurring during “non-instructional time” must be allowed and that the Supreme Court agrees on this point.
“So long as non-disruptive speech occurs during non-instructional time, schools must allow that speech. The Supreme Court has already confirmed this very point,” the ADF added.
The Supreme Court case Engel v. Vitale determined that the Constitution prohibits compulsory school or state-sponsored prayer. Private and student-led prayers, however, are allowed.
The school administrators have since changed their tone. In a letter to the ADF dated Dec. 17, Fischer noted that the district’s attorney agreed that the students’ prayer did not violate federal law and that he has advised Twiford “to let the students know that they can pray before meals in the manner they had in the incident in question. … I feel our staff and district have a better understanding of students’ rights regarding prayer and how to handle future incidents.”
Fischer also reported that students prayed in the cafeteria “at least once … and will continue to be allowed to do so.”
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/12/21/school-cafeterias-are-not-religion-free-zones-wyoming-school-reverses-prayer-ban/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Firewire%20-%20HORIZON%2012-21-15%20FINAL&utm_term=Firewire
The Supreme Court case Engel v. Vitale determined that the Constitution prohibits compulsory school or state-sponsored prayer. Private and student-led prayers, however, are allowed.
The school administrators have since changed their tone. In a letter to the ADF dated Dec. 17, Fischer noted that the district’s attorney agreed that the students’ prayer did not violate federal law and that he has advised Twiford “to let the students know that they can pray before meals in the manner they had in the incident in question. … I feel our staff and district have a better understanding of students’ rights regarding prayer and how to handle future incidents.”
Fischer also reported that students prayed in the cafeteria “at least once … and will continue to be allowed to do so.”
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/12/21/school-cafeterias-are-not-religion-free-zones-wyoming-school-reverses-prayer-ban/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Firewire%20-%20HORIZON%2012-21-15%20FINAL&utm_term=Firewire
4 comments:
" I feel our staff and district have a better understanding of students’ rights regarding prayer and how to handle future incidents.”" MY *SS!!!!! THEY KNEW EXACTLY WHAT THEY WERE DOING. IT IS CALLED STRIPPING OF RIGHTS AND INTIMIDATION. SHAME ON THIS SCHOOL AND ANY SCHOOL WHO DOES THIS AND THEN SHOVES ISLAM DOWN OUR CHILDREN'S THROATS. KEEP STANDING UP PARENTS. YOUR KIDS NEED YOU AND THEY DESERVE IT!!!
Did those same parents insist that Muslim students should also have a place to pray?
Those 'muslims' shouldn't be in this country in the first place according to the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act. Has little to nothing to do with the 'religion' - but everything to do with the REQUIREMENTS of a 'faithful muslim' to their 'religion' as easily understand in their Quran. None of their belief system and practices fits with this nation, nor with the European nations - not with our legal system, not with our treatments of women, children and babies, not with dress code, and not with their 'prayer' practices. They are like trying to plug a square plug in a round hold. Does not mean that some of these people are not 'good' or 'nice', but their belief system and practices is a no fit.
Historically proven, through their demonic belief system via the Quran, this group has destroyed nearly every civilization and nation they have either invaded or been allowed to enter. They are not wanted in Europe, nor in the united States. Let them pray in their homes and in their mosques. And, it is not my responsibility nor that of any other American to foot the bill for these people to 'migrate' to our nation. They are receiving FREE EVERYTHING off the backs of hard working Americans who, themselves, are suffering tremendously with job losses, wage reductions, etc. There is no way in HELL that WE would be welcomed and provided for in their muslim nations. It would be off with our heads. To continue with this 'immigration' is beyond foolish. It is begging for major trouble. Expect the beheadings and other problems to begin in this nation very very soon. Hopefully these demonic freeloaders will be on their way back to their muslim origin shortly.
NO!!! Like ANON: 8:34 said: "Those 'muslims' shouldn't be in this country in the first place according to the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act" PUBLIC LAW 414. America is a Christian Judaeo country. If others including Muslims sneak into this country or via the UNLAWFUL REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT PROGRAM WHICH IS GOING TO BE GONE WHEN TRUMP GETS IN. AND...TRUMP WILL GET IN then Muslims either pray in their Mosques or conform with AMERICAN VALUES. If the Muslims were not here prior to 1952, then they are not here legally. sorry. You can take that up with the democrats.
Post a Comment