What if Clinton's indicted?
2/29/16 12:01 AM
Hillary Clinton faces a range of high and unexpected hurdles to the Democratic nomination which, a year ago, was seen as hers virtually by monarchical right.
She has failed to get beyond the robust challenge from Sen. Bernie Sanders, a septuagenarian socialist whose political career has until now been more a curiosity than a powerful force.
Despite her efforts, Clinton has also failed to drum up enthusiasm for the idea of the historic election of America's first female president.
And she can't seem to shake the perception that, as a former first lady, former senator, former secretary of state and current establishment favorite, she is part of an elite against whom the base of both parties are rebelling this election cycle.
But perhaps the biggest challenge to her candidacy is yet to come. As the Federal Bureau of Investigation drills down on Clinton's handling of classified information on an insecure email network, the Democratic front-runner faces the possibility that she and her top aides could be indicted for compromising national security.
Even if the odds are against her being charged, it's a possibility that has become less easily dismissed than it was last spring, when it was confined to hopeful whispers in Republican circles. Back then, even as news emerged that Clinton had handled sensitive government secrets, most people still thought she would cruise to the presidential nomination this summer.
But few people other than Clinton's own campaign hands now argue that the former secretary of state's legal situation is entirely secure. Two Obama administration agencies, the Justice Department and the State Department, are pursuing related lines of inquiry about her private email usage. Setting aside the handful of Republican-led congressional probes into her emails, experts say Clinton can no longer credibly make the case that concern about her handling of classified information falls strictly along party lines.
Which leads to certain questions. If accusations against Clinton lead to an indictment, what would follow?
Could she continue to run for the White House?
What would happen to her delegates?
Would the Democrats allow themselves to be represented in the general election by Sanders?
Or would Vice President Joe Biden or some other champion step in to take her place?
While the FBI has been especially tight-lipped about the scope and focus of its investigation into Clinton's emails, the bureau recently acknowledged the probe has a "law enforcement" component, apparently repudiating Clinton's long-standing argument that it is nothing more than a routine "security review."
Michael Mukasey, former attorney general under President George W. Bush, said there's no such thing as an FBI "security review."
"That designation is unknown to anybody," Mukasey told the Washington Examiner. "The FBI doesn't conduct security reviews. They conduct investigations. They investigate possible crimes."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/what-if-hillary-clintons-indicted/article/2584119
Hillary Clinton faces a range of high and unexpected hurdles to the Democratic nomination which, a year ago, was seen as hers virtually by monarchical right.
She has failed to get beyond the robust challenge from Sen. Bernie Sanders, a septuagenarian socialist whose political career has until now been more a curiosity than a powerful force.
Despite her efforts, Clinton has also failed to drum up enthusiasm for the idea of the historic election of America's first female president.
And she can't seem to shake the perception that, as a former first lady, former senator, former secretary of state and current establishment favorite, she is part of an elite against whom the base of both parties are rebelling this election cycle.
But perhaps the biggest challenge to her candidacy is yet to come. As the Federal Bureau of Investigation drills down on Clinton's handling of classified information on an insecure email network, the Democratic front-runner faces the possibility that she and her top aides could be indicted for compromising national security.
But few people other than Clinton's own campaign hands now argue that the former secretary of state's legal situation is entirely secure. Two Obama administration agencies, the Justice Department and the State Department, are pursuing related lines of inquiry about her private email usage. Setting aside the handful of Republican-led congressional probes into her emails, experts say Clinton can no longer credibly make the case that concern about her handling of classified information falls strictly along party lines.
Which leads to certain questions. If accusations against Clinton lead to an indictment, what would follow?
Could she continue to run for the White House?
What would happen to her delegates?
Would the Democrats allow themselves to be represented in the general election by Sanders?
Or would Vice President Joe Biden or some other champion step in to take her place?
While the FBI has been especially tight-lipped about the scope and focus of its investigation into Clinton's emails, the bureau recently acknowledged the probe has a "law enforcement" component, apparently repudiating Clinton's long-standing argument that it is nothing more than a routine "security review."
Michael Mukasey, former attorney general under President George W. Bush, said there's no such thing as an FBI "security review."
"That designation is unknown to anybody," Mukasey told the Washington Examiner. "The FBI doesn't conduct security reviews. They conduct investigations. They investigate possible crimes."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/what-if-hillary-clintons-indicted/article/2584119
4 comments:
The BS dog and pony show continues. Comey said that he was going to resign if Killery was not indicted and arrested by the first of this month. Take a look around and see where Killery and Comey are. Keep in mind that this could also be their clone or one of them.
The Justice Department and the State Department, are pursuing related lines of inquiry about her private email usage? Good one. The monkey guarding the banana plantation is pursuing lines of inquiry on who is eating all the bananas
the bitch will never be brought to trial, she has so much dirt on the rest of the elected scumbags in dc that she will threaten them all individually if she goes down, my synopsis is that she will loose to sanders, by a small majority, he will loose to cruz by voter fraud, hitlery will be "retired" and obozo will make sure she and him can never be held responsible for anything while in any position of government,
as for trump, they are already tampering with the machines in Texas, it doesnt matter who gets the vote as long as its not trump, watch for stolen votes being spread evenly by a small percentage amongst other candidates, so as not to harm cruz controlled or rubberneck rubio, this is a dog and pony show, they will never let trump take control, he is any politicians worst nightmare, because he tells the truth, and the public love him for it!
How can the people really vote their choice when a delegation is appointed after the election to chose who gets in. This is disgusting.
The people haven't even known that they were not really 'voting', much less for their 'choice'. The 'voting' in this nation for the higher level positions in this criminal cabal make believe 'government' has been rigged since at least the 50's and 60's, especiallly in Texas. Everyone in Texas knew full well about Lyndon Johnson, the Hunts and others and NO ONE wanted them in ANY office. Same has been true for many of those to follow in most ALL the states. Unless and until the people wake up and make KNOWN their dissatisfaction with this criminal mob running the nation and all of us and DO SOMETHING TO PUT A PERMANENT STOP TO THEIR GRAFT, all will continue as it has been for nearly 100 years.
Post a Comment