Wednesday, February 15, 2017

Lawful and Legal: Why You Need to Know What They Mean

Knowing the difference between the words lawful and legal can one day free your mind and soul from the illusion of the Matrix. The word lawful is related to Natural Law (God’s Law). It is used to communicate things of substance. As for the word legal, it is related to laws created by man and is used to communicate things of form.
In simpler terms, something that is lawful is of substance so it is real. On other hand, something that is legal is of form so it appears to be real. In other words, the word legal deals with fictional things. A fictional thing is not real and therefore it is DEAD.
One of the ways they secretly tell you that you are playing a role of a dead character is the all caps name. Hence, the name in all caps on tombstones. You can find the all caps name on government documents, such as a state-issued ID. For more information about the all caps name, read my empowering article titled The Legal Name Game to Enslave Your Soul.
If you agree to participate in the legal system, you also agree to be a dead person, and therefore you have no natural rights.  – Pao Chang
Picture of the Definition of Lawful and Legal
What is legal is of “form”, what is lawful is of “substance” (Blacks Law 1st Edition).
That which is legal has been formed by man. A legal entity has been formed by man. That which is lawful is of substance/essence and is a creation of God. A lawful man is of substance/essence.
Natural Person: Any human being who as such is a legal entity ….. (Amon v. Moreschi, 296 N.Y. 395, 73 N.E.2d 716.” Max Radin, Radin’s Law Dictionary (1955), p. 216).
What is legal is of “form”… therefore a “legal entity” is an entity of form.
Since “any human being who as such is a legal entity“,  a human being is of form as well.
Human. Of the form and characteristics of man. (From Ballentine’s Legal Dictionary 3rd Edition).
Form. The antithesis of substance; the appearance or superficial aspect rather than the substance or the essence. (Ballentine’s Legal Dictionary 3rd Edition).
Natural Person = human being = legal entity
Legal entities are a conception of man; they are known in legalese as legal fictions.
The creation of a civil or legal person out of a thing, the investure of a chattel with toga civillis, may be an achievement of the imperial power, but it is beyond the compass of an American congress. Congress must first emancipate the slave, before it can endow him with the rights of a citizen under the constitution, or impose upon him the responsibilities of a legal person, or compel him to pay money, or part with liberty. United States v. Amy, 24 Fed.Cas.792, 794 #14,445 (1859).
The creation of a legal person also creates responsibilities and liabilities for this new legal person… responsibilities and liabilities due to a nation/country, which is also a legal entity.
Legal is defined as”the “undoing of God’s law” (1893 Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, Encyclopedia Britannica, a dictionary of arts, sciences and general literature / The R.S Peale 9th 1893).
James 4:12 There is one lawgiver, who can save and destroy: who art thou that judgest another.
Ecclesiastes 1:15 That which is crooked cannot be made straight: and that which is wanting cannot be numbered.
A fiction and a lie can never be a reality and a truth. That which is empty cannot be measured or counted.
This article was found on and republished on this website for educational purposes.

1 comment:

  1. Don't believe.

    Don't read, this is what some here call crazy.
    Of course they would know, they have an all seeing eye or something.

    Lawful = Substance = Reality = Fact ---- De Facto
    Legal = Form = Fiction = Jure/Jury ----- De Jure

    People spend a lot of time, getting the form together to legally create their De Jure Government, which is a competing fiction for what already exists.

    Two people can't hold the same office.

    But trust these people who you know nothing about.
    Trust those that don't know me, and call me crazy.
    Really, someone can sit in their room or office and cast judgment over words and decide the quality of the life of the one who expresses them.

    Would you want to be secluded in some survival situation with people who will call you names if they disagree with how you think or convey a thought?

    Would you want to be governed by people who want you to believe what they say, or you are considered crazy by them? What will they do to a 'crazy' people if they can't control the information the 'crazy' people convey.

    Isn't name calling a form of psychological censorship?
    This is a tactic used to keep someone from observing or learning something because if they are 'AFRAID' to know what a 'crazy' people knows, then they will avoid the information and remain with the same knowledge they started the day with.

    If you learn nothing new, you are the same as you were, there is no advancement without additional information.

    If someone else tells you where to get your information, they can control you by telling you to avoid, just like someone can control you by telling you something that is not fact.

    You make up your decisions, and the more you take over your power to decide for you, and to decide what you will observe or learn, the more you build and control your power.

    It won't happen if you give it to someone else to decide for you with their old paradigm of labeling things that they do not agree with and labeling people who communicate what they do not want to know.

    I'm in my power, and I'm building it daily because what I go through with these unknown people has strengthened me and awakened more than I knew was there.

    The warehouse of information, where our flashlight can only shine on so much at a time, well the beam of my light is getting wider and brighter and I am obtaining more because I don't have a lock on my mind and I don't let someone labeling someone they don't agree with, stop me from learning something now.