From Anna Von Reitz
Yesterday I had another hard knock. A reader writing from Wyoming, upset because the State of Wyoming Supreme Court had denied the sovereignty of a man claiming to be a "private citizen".
What else was the State of Wyoming Supreme Court supposed to do?
Claiming
to be a "private citizen" is the same exact kind of oxymoron as
claiming to be a "sovereign citizen". You cannot be acting in a
private capacity and claiming to be a citizen at the same time.
You are either in the Army or out of the Army. There is no in-between.
So-- ask yourself this all-important question: Am I a citizen?
That is:
(1) Am I federal employee or dependent? If so, I am a citizen.
(2) Am I an African- American? If so, I am a citizen, but have Equal Civil Rights.
(3) Am I listed in Title 42 -- a political asylum seeker, recent immigrant, or welfare seeker? If so, I am a citizen.
(4)
Am I consciously, willingly operating "as" a federal corporate
franchisee in international commerce? If so, I am a citizen.
(5) Was I born in Guam or Puerto Rico or some other legitimate and recognized territory of the United States?
For
90% of Americans, the honest answer to these questions is --- hell, no,
I am not a "citizen" and never have been, except for a brief stint in
the US military.
So why are you all wandering
around nodding your heads like zombies and agreeing that you are "US
Citizens" or "citizens of the United States"?
It's because you have been indoctrinated to answer yes without thinking, without even questioning what a "citizen" is.
Look up the legal definition. A citizen owes an obligation of service to the government.
Do you have any obligation to serve the government? Or does the government have an obligation to serve you?
So, it's simple. If you aren't a "citizen" stop saying that you are. Say, I am "a non-citizen national" instead.
Another way to think of this is--- "citizen" equals "public capacity", while "non-citizen national" equals "private capacity".
You
are in the Army or out of the Army, part of and working for the
government, or not, voluntarily accepting public "benefits" or not.
If
that unfortunate gentleman in Wyoming had known these simple facts, and
had characterized himself properly as a "non-citizen national and
native of Wyoming" (or whatever other state he was born in) the results
of his trial might have turned out very differently, but until we know
for sure who we are, and in what capacity we are acting, we can't blame
anyone else for not knowing who we are and what we are doing---that is,
in what capacity we are acting.
The courts, in
order to have jurisdiction, are always going to presume that you are a
citizen and that you are consciously acting as a citizen at all times.
It's
up to you to tell them otherwise, and it is also up to you to document
your choices and political status on the public record BEFORE you get
hauled into their courts. Otherwise they are free to presume that you
are a "citizen" and subject to the whims of the government, which has no
obligation to serve "citizens".
Citizens have no constitutional rights or guarantees.
Citizens are obligated to know and observe and obey all 80,000,000 statutory laws and Public Policies.
Citizens
can't own land in the actual states and are merely "residents" --
temporarily passing through while they are stationed here to provide
"essential government services".
Citizens are obligated to pay federal and federated state income and property taxes.
Citizens are responsible for paying the entire public debt and can't question it.
Are
you beginning to get the drift here? ---Beginning to understand why
you have been indoctrinated since grade school to identify yourself as a
"citizen" and never told that you had any other option?
If
you are finding this information helpful, please consider making a
donation to the cause. Our guys in the field are slogging it out inch
by inch, page by page, filing by filing. They need your help to keep
going. I need your help to keep going. Please, if you have any "extra"
you can spare to spread this knowledge and the lawful claims that go
with it--- share. The Crunch is upon us.
Send PayPal donations to: avannavon@gmail.com
Send checks and money orders to: Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o Post Office Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska, 99652.
And thank you for listening and sharing-- for the sake of your own selves and your families and your country.
----------------------------
See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
2 comments:
Far out that the person tried.
Does that now create presidence for the state to throw out new alike cases based upon this conclusion...after all merit was made to the Supreme Court.
Its case study now...
I just ask... I'm wanting to try this myself so I can show others it can be done. But likely I would have had the same result as the person from Wyoming.
Now, if I go to Wyoming to try...am I going to get denied a Supreme Court hearing based upon this result.
Does this set us back, or can he appeal in such a manner as to explain in another term.
Generally speaking, that is, cases like this are just written and decided without verbal argument so on appeal in written text wouldn't the person be able to better explain.
THIS IS WHERE I AM A DUMBASS AND I ADMIT IT JUDGE... Just Saying
Thank you Ma'am for your service to country you deserve the attention.
not entirely true but generally true; if you look at State Citizen it has been defined as separate and different from a U.S. citizen or citizen of the United States most importantly pre-civil war.
Constitutional State Citizen; Constitution for the United States of America, the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty-seven and of the Declaration of Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth, Article 4 Section 2a; “The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.”
but unltimately i agree with what judge anna says above. also keep in mind it depends on what that person entered into evidence, his basis and if he really knows who he is which he probably does not. there is no Public status of "private citizen" i would imagine you would say as far as status a Michigan Citizen, private, state national if anything which no need for the private as it is assumed that. seems like confusion of Public v private to me.
if you really want to get technical again as i posted in the Bill of Rights section, the 14th amendment can be construed to be void based on the 9th and 10th amendments respectively, as it is obviously void if it violates and infringes upon your inherent, god-given Rights, but your actions speak louder than words and if your actions all say differently i.e, contracts employed that prove you are, well, what can you say? your minimum contacts state such to the contrary so start rescinding, revoking and disaffirming all signatures as anyone can change their mind, afterall, it is your Right too, correct?
Post a Comment