By Anna Von Reitz
Let me explain why I -- a card-carrying Lutheran since 1963 -- don't jump on the bandwagon and decry the Roman Catholic Church.
He responded as any honest and good man would. He got out his mop and bucket and went to work.
Later,
Francis continued the work Benedict began, albeit, in his own fashion,
and with an obvious concern to protect the Church and its interests.
Given that the Pope is the head of the Roman Catholic Church, his
concern in that regard did not surprise me or seem inappropriate.
So,
although I could wish for faster responses or actions taken in a
different order, I can't criticize the Church for lack of response or
inappropriate response to the issues raised.
Francis, like Benedict, has picked up his mop and bucket and soldiered on.
My Shinola Sensor also takes note of other indicators--- for example:
What
other human institution has taken a stand against the wholesale murder
of babies, deceitfully disguised by the word "abortion" as if that
magically transformed murder into something else?
What
other institution blocks and guards the slippery moral slope that,
having once discounted human life on the basis of age, prevents the next
logical mis-step and permits the murder of the elderly and infirm?
Lest
we forget, Obummer's Secretary of Education suggested that we should be
able to "cull" children up until the arbitrary age of six, and get rid
of any that, in our obviously omnipotent opinion, don't measure up.
The
Roman Catholic Church is the firewall against that kind of thinking.
It is the ultimate bulwark against moral "relativism" and the one solid
defender that unborn babies have in this twisted world.
Now,
given that fact--- and fact it is--- do you smell something rotten in
Switzerland when the same Church is accused of child trafficking and
child molestation and even child sacrifice?
Nothing,
absolutely nothing, could be farther removed from actual Church
teaching and doctrine. It is in fact that exact opposite of what the
Church stands for.
To
me, it looks like a typical Satanic set up: pretend to be a Catholic
the same way Satanists pretend to be Jews or Muslims, do their ugly
criminal work while wearing a nun's habit or a priest's robes, and then
let the Church take the fall for their evil doing.
That
is, after all, the known modus operandi of the Satanists and always has
been: mirror everything. Steal the identity of your enemies. Commit
your crimes and shove the blame off onto them, while you put on another
costume and exit stage left.
While acting under the guise of being "US Citizens" the same Bad Actors have done the same kind of hatchet job on Americans.
So
I don't get all excited and jump up and down when someone makes claims
of genocide and ritual sacrifice. I sit back and take in the view and I
ask myself -- who is who?
What's
to keep a Satanist from pretending to be a saint? Why wouldn't a
criminal put on the face of a prosecutor? Haven't we been told that
Satan himself appears as an "angel of light"?
It
has been ten years and though there has been plenty of gossip and many
cases of reported sexual abuse by the clergy --- some of it actual and
some drummed up to get money --- and even some sworn eye-witness
testimony, there still isn't a shred of actual evidence of ritual
sacrifice on the record.
None. Not a single bone. Not a single bloody rag. Nothing.
And bear in mind, that Satanists spin lies like a spider spins webs.
Every
lie is a prayer to Satan in their worldview, so what is "eye-witness
testimony" from such witnesses worth? Sworn false testimony is just a
bigger lie --- more points if you don't get caught.
This
latest attempted arrest of Pope Francis, purportedly on his way to
officiate at a ritual child sacrifice, presents the important question
--- if these idiots knew that such a sacrifice was scheduled to happen,
why didn't they simply wait until the "Ninth Circle" convened, and catch
the whole lot of them in the act?
No, I'm sorry. My Shinola Sensor is beeping. Loudly.
Why is it that Kevin Annett and the ITCCS showed up at exactly the same time that Pope Benedict moved to correct the banks?
Why
is it that when you look at the actual, proven genocide and human
trafficking records, it all stacks up against the governments? And the
banks behind the governments?
Like the Nazis killing off their Priority Creditors, so they wouldn't have to pay them back?
Like the "U.S. Trustees" copyrighting the Given Names of children as property belonging to foreign investment corporations?
Like
the Bush and Obummer Administrations militarizing our police and
setting up FEMA Camps---planning to get rid of their Priority Creditors,
just like the Nazis. Again.
The
actual motive for all the killing and kidnapping and identity theft is
money, not religion. Unless, of course, like the Satanists, your
religion is idolatry and money is your idol.
Let's give everyone some clues here:
It
wasn't the Roman Catholic Church running the US Patent and Trademark
Office as a criminal enterprise. It was Serco, formerly RCA, a British
conglomerate, and behind Serco, it was N.M. Rothschild. These are the
entities actually responsible for perpetuating and enforcing the
institutionalized fraud, racketeering, and identity theft that has
engulfed the entire world.
And it surely
wasn't the Roman Catholic Church setting up a giant owl statue -- an
idol known since pre-Canaanite times as "Molloch, the Devourer" at the
Bohemian Grove in California. Molloch was originally an iron furnace,
which the Babylonians and later, Carthaginians, would heat up red hot,
and then throw their living first-born infants into its gaping mouth.
This
is what the bankers and politicians were playing at and memorializing
in California with their "Cremation of Care" ceremonials. Like abortion,
making sacrifices to "Molloch" was another way of getting rid of the
unwanted babies resulting from their orgies and perverse, hedonistic
life-styles.
And this is also what was going on in the Valley of Hinom, which caused it to be a place of horror.
The
doctrines and trappings of this ancient and profane religion in the
modern era are on display at the Bohemian Grove and in the words and
intentions of Agenda 21 and the Genocide Treaty. It's also self-evident
in the practice of declaring everyone to be "dead" and subject to the
statutory law.
Remember that I told you that religion is the source of law?
So
it will not seem so strange to you, when I tell you that Satanism is
the source of codes, regulations, and statutes--- all those things that
deceptively appear to be "law" --- but aren't. This is a deception of
the Father of All Lies, carried out by his servants, the members of the
Temple Bar.
And what is the "Bar"? The Bar is
also called the "Veil". It is the demarcation between the jurisdiction
of the land and the sea, and also between life and death.
Remember
the scene from "The Pirates of the Caribbean" where Captain Barbossa
says something like, "Oh, so, Missy, you don't believe in ghosts or
ghost stories?" And a flash of lightening shows that he and his crew are
all walking skeletons. "Well, you'd best be believing, because you are
in one!"
According to the Bar Attorneys
responsible for these heinous acts and fraud against the living
people---including the act of kidnapping and trafficking us into the
jurisdiction of the dead in the first place --- we are all ghosts.
Lucifer
has come to murder and enslave and destroy, and to do it under color of
law, under a pretense of benefiting and enlightening the people he is
preying upon.
Be forewarned and keep your Shinola Sensors handy. Things are about to get very interesting.
2 comments:
Hmmm. . . It is interesting that this article, and the one immediately proceeding it were posted by the same fella, but they are in direct opposition to one another.
Could this be a "We report, you decide!" kind of thing?
What people need to realize is that it is possible for both stories to have some truth in them. It is a matter of jurisdiction. What hat was that man they call the Pope wearing in each instance. One hat is as a revered spiritual leader and the other is that of a secular leader high in finance and other secular world affairs. While the previous Pope did grab his mop and go to work, issued that document, the "Quo Warranto", Motu Proprio (because he can) that was supposed to rip from the grasp of the Cabal the power which they have to be supposedly immune from prosecution. But, so far, as with everything else, nothing has actually changed in that regard. Sure we hear stories of those in high places getting "arrested" or "removed from their position" or "removed off-planet" and etc. But, the interesting thing about all of that is that the ones who actually matter and are causing the ruckuss are still here, causing the ruckuss!
So, we will see which of these two stories about the Pope turns out to be the most truthful when he is either cuff'd-n-stuff'd, or comes out on top of this mess and does his job (under the spiritual hat) and frames his actions of the other hat (the secular leader one) under the guidance of the spiritual leader hat.
JMHO - YMMV
DS
I just feel , something is just not right with this judge anna , article , she seems to massively contradicting herself , and flipping from past articles where the fraud and evil points directly at the vatican , has she been compromised , something smells funny , foul ,wrong here .
Post a Comment