Why The Articles of Confederation Matter -- Today

 
By Anna Von Reitz

When I was in school the whole subject of The Articles of Confederation was glossed over.  I was told that The Articles of Confederation were used very early on in our history and then "replaced" by the Constitution. 

I would be willing to bet that 99% of the people reading this were given the same pat answer about The Articles of Confederation--- not because our teachers meant to lie to us, but because they were never taught the truth about this subject themselves. 

Still, even back then, reading both documents, I had a hard time seeing how The Articles of Confederation could be replaced by the Constitution?  That was Sixth Grade. 

We passed over the subject again in Eleventh Grade.  By then I had even more pesky questions in my mind.  

The Articles of Confederation proposed to create a "perpetual Union" so, logic dictates that for that Union to end, some official action would have to be taken by the States to end it.  Where, I asked, is that official action?  

There's no record of anything like that happening at the Constitutional Convention.  Nor is there anything like that in evidence anywhere at any time afterward.  

Like the missing Declaration of War and missing Peace Treaty ending the Civil War, it's what's not there --- that should be --- that exposes the lie we've been told. 

The Articles of Confederation were broken by Secession of the Southern States from the Confederation, but never by formal agreement.  

Under Law, you cannot force parties to remain in association once they have determined otherwise; pieces of paper have only so much ability to guarantee the future decisions of living men and so it was that the decision of the Southern States to withdraw from the original Confederation and form their own --- The Confederate States of America -- was what ended The Articles of Confederation as a viable instrument.  

They were not replaced by any Constitution. Self-evidently they were not replaced by the Founders at the Constitutional Convention, and were still in full effect in 1860 when The Great Schism occurred. 

Since then, I've been told, Keith Livingway went to a Navy auction and bought a copy of the original Articles of Confederation, which he claims gives him the power to resurrect the original Confederation of States. 

While it is an important artifact at this point and while it is worth wondering why the Navy had it in its possession and what possessed the Admirals to offer it for sale at an auction--- the legal eagles in charge of the British Territorial United States got one thing straight: once the original Confederation was broken, it would have to be "Reconstructed". 

That would require action by all the States to establish new Federal level States of States and then their agreement to create a new Confederation of States to operate the Federal level Government as intended by our Forefathers. 

Instead what happened is that the British Monarch operated in Gross Breach of Trust and the then-Pope sat by like a spider and did nothing to prevent Queen Victoria from creating Territorial level "States of States" and under conditions of semantic deceit, substituting her own proxy franchises for the Federal States of State that we are owed. 

Most people couldn't tell the substantial difference between "The State of Georgia" and the "State of Georgia" and the general populace of this country was certainly never told.  

The sudden appearance of entities called, for example, the "Georgia State" was never explained, either, but these are the vestiges of the Federal States of States--- so-called "land trusts" to hold the assets of the former Federal States of States in trust. 

But that is another deceit.  These are "land trusts" in the same sense that the Federal Constitution is called "the Law of the Land" --- that is, these are descriptions from the British Territorial perspective.  They are at sea and when they come to work here, they are obligated to obey what? The Law of the Land.   In the same way these "land trusts" are trusts that they have held "for" the land jurisdiction States, and don't actually hold any interest in the land owned by the States at all. 

Our States kept all right, title and interest in both the soil and the land, plus all non-delegated powers in the international jurisdiction of the sea, and they limited the interests of the delegated global air jurisdiction to the ten miles square of Washington, DC.  

Our States were never involved in the so-called "American Civil War" and our Federation was never directly affected by the dissolution of the Confederation.  

So we have been lied to in our schools for generations in order to cover up the British Breach of Trust and contract and usurpation against our lawful government.  

The Brits were also at the bottom of the dog pile giving rise to the Civil War conflict.  The Queen and the Parliament had invested heavily in Egyptian Cotton ventures, seeking a cheaper and closer alternative to American Cotton for their mills.  They felt the need to curtail American Cotton production to increase prices and stabilize the market for their own Egyptian Cotton.  And as they have done so often in other places in the world, they started a "mercenary conflict" on our shores. 

Abraham Lincoln was a Bar Association Member in Illinois, strictly prohibited from holding any public office in our Federal Government since 1819.  He couldn't hold the actual Office of President of The United States of America, but he could hold the Territorial Office of The President of the United States of America.  See the difference?  "The" versus "the" United States of America 

It would take a sharp and well-educated man with an appreciation for the deceitfulness of law and government to discern any difference at all between "The President of The United States of America" and "The President of the United States of America" ---- and Lincoln made full use of the deceit to embroil this country in a terrible and totally illegal commercial mercenary war, not that different from what went on in Vietnam a generation ago. 

It is now time that everyone concerned, including the Roman Curia, woke up and smelled the java.  

This great country was grossly abused and defrauded by international Trustees that owed us Good Faith Service and "perpetual amity", deliberately deceived by members of the Bar Associations engaged to act as Privateers by those same Trustees, and then misdirected and used as a source of mercenaries and materials to fight endless wars for profit. 

That is what actually happened here. 

And both the American People and the rest of the world have a vital stake and interest in seeing that this venal "set up" comes to an end in America and is not perpetuated again in any other part of the world via the abuse of any other people or foreign government. 

We, the living people and all the nations of the world, must recognize the sources of all the misery and deceit and the destruction that the corrupted Church officials and British Monarchs have wrought for the past two centuries. We must all join together with one accord to put the British Con Artists under our heels and drive Ba'al out of the Church, so that we can again enjoy our peace and prosperity worldwide. 

This is not just an American "problem".  It is a problem for the entire world and it has been for thousands of years.  The resurgence of this profane "religion" in the 1860's has already led to two World Wars.  Enough is enough.   

Solving this Mess on a worldwide basis requires outlawing and disbanding the Bar Associations and re-educating lawyers to obey and execute the actual Public Law.  They are acting as racketeers and most of them don't even realize that they are doing anything wrong. 

It also requires an adjustment of perceptions.  

The Roman Catholic Church's corruption is a principle cause of the problem, not a solution; apart from its sincere repentance, reform, and proven correction it cannot be relied upon to act as a Trustee for America or any other nation.

The British Throne has likewise been overthrown and those functioning as "Kings" and "Queens" have knowingly deceived the people of Britain by going through the Coronation process and then secretively abdicating the Throne and occupying the Chair of the Estates on the land and the office of "Britannic Majesty" on the sea.  

This overthrow and misrepresentation of the Christian nations of Britain, Ireland, Scotland and Wales by Satanists who pretend to be Christian Monarchs simply for the purpose of gaining access to power is yet another example of how the Satanists mirror everything in their efforts to confuse the issues and identities to their advantage. 

Are you dealing with the Pope or the Pontiff?  With Her Royal Majesty or Her Britannic (Satanic) Majesty?  With The President of The United States of America or The President of the United States of America?  

It is well past time for the Evil in High Places to be kicked in the rump, recognized for where and what it is, vanquished once and for all--- and not allowed to get started again anywhere on Earth.