Thursday, October 25, 2012

Health - 6 Hidden Reasons Why You're FAT (and Shouldn't Be)

6 Hidden Reasons Why You're FAT  (and Shouldn't Be) 
 

 
If I were a genie and gave you three wishes, what would you wish for?
I'd be willing to bet that some of the popular answers would include:
To be rich!
Good health.
A big house.
A head full of hair!
To get the man or woman of your dreams.
World peace.
To be famous.
Happiness.

And of course, the BIGGIE...
To take off the weight AND keep it off!
If you're one of the people who has gone through countless cycles where you dieted, Iost pounds and turned around and put them all back on (and then some), you're not alone.
And if you want to finally get off the roller coaster of going up and down in poundage, you must not only do what really works to take off weight, but you also must avoid....
The Six Diet Booby Traps
Below are common booby traps that will almost guarantee that your efforts to shed the blubber will fail.
And you will continue to be frustrated and want to take a sledgehammer to the scale.
Without further ado, here they are:
Booby trap #1: Falling for marketing deception
Food manufacturers are VERY slick in how they market their products. They know that people are trying to be more health-conscious, so they are masterfully sneaky as they try to convince you that their products are somehow "healthy" even though they ain't.
Know this: Many of these "healthy" foods are anything BUT.
Take beverages, for example. Beverage manufacturers realize that people are catching on to the fact that soda can pack the pounds on you.
So how do these companies keep the more health-conscious people fooled...er, I mean, happy too? "Healthy" sports drinks, of course!
But they fail to point out that sports drinks and vitamin waters are LOADED with sugar and calories--in other words, basically no different than blubber-creating soda.
"Low fat" is another deceptive joke.
Products that are low fat are usually packed with sugar to help overcome the disgusting taste and texture of the food that resulted when the fat was taken out.
And that sugar will add nicely to your muffin top.
 

Booby trap #2: All carbs are bad
Thanks to protein-heavy diet plans like the South Beach Diet and Atkins, many people have been led to believe that all carbs are evil and will widen your backside.
That's simply NOT true...
Carbohydrates are VITAL to your body's functioning. Carbs are broken down into glucose, which is your body's primary fuel. Glucose is the main source of energy for muscle function, your central nervous system and especially your brain.
Putting it bluntly, without carbs you DIE.
The important thing is to become carb-savvy and choose COMPLEX carbs (like those found in whole grains, vegetables and legumes) and stay away from fat-creating processed and refined carbs (like sweets, white breads, white sugar, etc.)
 

Booby trap #3: Starvation
I remember back in high school, my friends and I would skip breakfast AND lunch for days on end trying to become a magical size 3 or 5.
But eventually we'd get ravenously hungry and go chow down a pizza, burgers, french fries, ice cream or whatever we could get our hands on.
Not exactly a perfect diet plan.
Plus we also didn't realize that if you don't eat at regular intervals throughout the day, you can mess up your blood sugar and insulin levels. That can make your body STORE fat and lower your metabolism -- both of which lead to weight GAIN--not Ioss.
 

Booby trap #4: Mucha too mucha
Simply put, many people just don't realize how much they're eating.
Common ways to lose track include eating restaurant portions (studies show many restaurant meals are enough to nourish 2-3 people), eating while watching TV (so you're not paying attention to what you're shoveling in) or eating straight from a package (so you don't know how much you've inhaled until you see the empty bag).
That, coupled with the fact that many people eat WAY too fast (so they don't get the "full" signal until LONG after they've had too much food) leads to many a pair of jeans that you need to lie on the bed to zip.
 

Booby trap #5: Diet pill disaster
Most diet pills are designed to suppress your appetite while giving your body a source of some (synthetic) nutrients.
There are two glaring problems with this.
First off, any weight you drop when taking these pills will come rolling back on (and then some) once you stop the pills and start eating food again.
And second, your body knows the difference between synthetic nutrients and those found in real foods. The pills just don't cut it in terms of nutrition.
 

Booby trap #6: Couch potato-itis
I know this is THE thing you dread hearing the most, but I've got to be blunt.
If you have any hopes of wearing those skinny clothes in your closet (or for some of you, seeing your toes again), you MUST move your body.
Don't listen to those ads for BS products like pills or shakes that claim you don't need to exercise. They know that is what people want to hear. Remember, they want you to buy LOTS of their product and will say whatever it takes to make you do so, your health (and weight) be damned.
 

What DOES work for Iost pounds
Now that you know the six common diet booby traps, I'll tell you what you SHOULD do to once and for all take off the pounds AND keep them off!
It's a simple matter of 1, 2, 3:
1) Move your butt
Pick an activity you like or can at least tolerate and DO IT 3-4 times a week. Even brisk walking is fine and you can do that practically everywhere.
Studies show it helps to have an exercise buddy to keep you motivated. So grab a friend, your honey, the dog, a co-worker or whatever and get moving.
No excuses. No "But, but, but..."
Move it. Your "butt" will be SO glad you did.
 

2) Eat REAL foods
At least half and preferably 75-80% of what you eat should be real foods.
Real foods include fresh fruits, raw or lightly cooked vegetables, lean meats and poultry, fish, whole grains, dairy and essential fats...just not all in the same meal!
When you eat real foods like these in the right combinations, your body gets nourished the way it needs to be.
And when you're properly nourished, these wonderful things happen:
- You get full faster and end up eating LESS overall.
- The real foods you're eating are inherently lower in calories than the burgers, chips, candy or whatever other nutritionally dead foods you may have eaten in the past.
- Because you're properly nourished, you'll also STAY full and satisfied longer, so your chances of binging between meals have just been slashed.
All of this means: You the blubber falls off and stays off!
 

3) Make sure digestion is fast and efficient
This is by far the most important point of all.
If your foods are not being broken down like they should be, you're not getting the maximum nutrition from them. And that causes feelings of hunger which leads to overeating (and weight gain).
In addition, when your digestion is poor, that leads to waste buildup in your colon which can also bump up that scale number. It can also cause constipation, gas, bloating and eventually diverticulosis.
Attaining good digestion is easy--it's just is a matter of eating foods that digest well together, and giving your body a little assistance if needed.
Here's how:
1- Easily digested meals
It's essential to feed your body with real food and make sure your meals are easily digested and that you're getting nourished.
Now don't worry because this is easy and tastes great, too.
First off, the Great Taste No Pain health system will help you structure tasty, nutrient-loaded meals that are a breeze to digest.
The manual "How To End Stomach Pain Forever, Even If Your MD Says, 'No Way!'" shows you the few simple principles you'll need to know to make meals that digest easily and efficiently. This will keep acid wastes moving out and help maximize nutrient absorption, which in turn will help keep YOU feeling full and satisfied.
Goodbye constant feelings of hunger and overeating!
Not only will you enjoy scrumptious, nutrient-rich REAL foods (just wait until you try the mouth-watering dishes in the recipe book!), but you'll LOVE seeing those pounds disappear before your very eyes.
And if gluten is a concern for you, there's also Great Taste No Gluten. You'll learn the same food pairing principles as in Great Taste No Pain, plus you'll get a collection of outstanding gluten-free recipes and guides for staying gluten-free no matter where you are.
 

2- A little digestive "help":
Many people who have eaten a lot of hard-to-digest foods all their lives may be dangerously low in digestive enzymes...blowing through many of their limited lifetime supply of enzymes with every bite. That means incomplete digestion, lots of pain and an invitation for weight gain.
That's why it's critical that when you eat some foods you know aren't healthy or won't digest well...you get some digestive "help" during moments of weakness.
The help you need is right here -- Digestizol Max.
Digestizol Max helps your body break down whatever you've eaten--proteins, fats, carbs, fiber--and conserves your precious enzyme supply.
This will help keep your digestion running smoothly, even if you're low in enzymes or you massively screw up with your food choices.
Remember, antacids don't help you digest foods. They halt digestion. But digestive enzymes promote digestion.
Read more about Digestizol Max and all the ways it can help you here:
  Try it and see how infrequently you'll need those nasty antacids.
 

Don't be trapped any longer!
Look, if you want to once and for all shed the weight and keep it off, avoid the booby traps and do what really works.
When you exercise, eat real foods, have good digestion and absorb nutrients like Nature intended, your body works the way it's supposed to.
And that includes achieving and maintaining a normal weight easily and effortlessly!
If that sounds good to you, see for yourself how effective a healthy diet and efficient digestion can be.
Let the powerful team of Great Taste No Pain  or Great Taste No Gluten and Digestizol Max make today the first day of your new slimmer life.
To your health,
Sherry Brescia
PS: We're now on Facebook! Like us here:
- https://www.facebook.com/GreatTasteNoPain.HolisticBlendsInc

PPS: Michael's down 6 pounds and his friend Iost 35!
Hi Sherry,
I have been struggling with being overweight and weight Ioss seems to elude me no matter what methods I try.
A few weeks ago I was doing my daily walking/jogging on my normal route and bumped into an old friend. I could not avoid the fact that I barley recognized him as he had Iost approximately 35 pounds since I had last seen him!
He shared his story of suffering with acid reflux and how he finally found an eating plan (Great Taste No Pain) that helped curb his acid reflux and heartburn. One of the benefits of the "Great Taste No Pain" diet was weight Ioss.
I immediately got on-line decided to try your Great Taste No Pain plan. Since practicing the food mixing combinations 2 weeks ago I have Iost 6 pounds and no longer have a bloated belly.
Thanks to you I will continue the program and have no doubt that I will be healthier and happier in the years to come.
Regards,
Michael
*******************

Years of junk foods, meats, alcohol and soda drinking results in a decrease in your body's ability to produce digestive enzymes. This can result in daily painful gas, bloating, heartburn and constipation no matter how otherwise healthy your diet is! Digestizol Max can help turn that around for you fast. Its effective blend of 14 plant-derived enzymes and soothing herbs will help carry out the job of digestion and keep you feeling great! Learn more about Digestizol Max here.
====   
Got low energy? Brain fog? CRS disease? You just may be low in in just one vitamin. One out of four people are. Read more about this deficiency and how you can help turn that around FAST.
====  
Want the best probiotic on the market today? Then learn why Super Shield outshines all the rest here. 
==== 
A medical-grade fish oil like VitalMega-3 can help fight high cholesterol and triglycerides, as well as keep your joints feeling good, reducing chronic inflammation.
Learn more about VitalMega-3 and all the great things it can do for you here.
====  
Gluten has been linked to hundreds of health problems, including autoimmune diseases. If you are gluten sensitive or have an autoimmune disease, see what avoiding gluten can do for you.  Great Taste No Gluten will make gluten avoidance easy, while giving you 160 of the world's best gluten-free recipes to make you love every bite of your gluten-free life. Learn more about Great Taste No Gluten here.

Want case studies?  Here are a few THOUSAND health turnarounds for you to marvel at.

Haven't taken the Great Taste No Pain test drive?  Why not?  Get over to
- http://www.greattastenopain.com/freereports/ and feel the power of Great Taste No Pain.

Want to read past articles? Here they are.
* Forward this email to the people you care about the most!
(c) copyright 2012 Holistic Blends  
- http://www.greattastenopain.com/great.asp
- http://www.greattastenogluten.com/great.asp
- http://www.bluerockholistics.com

Orders: 1-315-295-1236
====================  
**The FDA has not evaluated all of these statements. The contents of this email are not to be considered medical advice and are for educational purposes only. If you are experiencing health challenges, always consult your doctor for medical advice and follow it even if it contradicts the contents of this email.**
=================================
Pain-Free Living is a permission-based newsletter. The only way to receive it is to request it here   

Picture says it all


  Picture says it all.

Pennsylvania Voter ID Law Ruling: Judge Halts Enforcement Of Law For Election


Pennsylvania Voter ID Law Ruling: Judge Halts Enforcement Of Law For Election

Posted on by Jean
Dan Froomkin
Source: huffingtonpost.com
Posted: 10/02/2012 10:03 am EDT
Updated: 10/02/2012 10:16 pm EDT

A Pennsylvania judge on Tuesday postponed the enforcement of the state’s new strict voter ID requirement until after the November presidential election.
In a much-anticipated ruling, Commonwealth Court Judge Robert E. Simpson Jr. ordered that voters without government-issued photo ID should be allowed to cast regular ballots.
“That’s a huge win,” said Witold J. Walczak, an attorney with the ACLU of Pennsylvania, “because last week the judge was suggesting that he was going to have every [voter without ID] vote provisionally.”
At the same time, the judge specifically ruled to allow the state to continue its education and advertising campaign, which currently tells voters that IDs are required.
Walczak said that if the state doesn’t change that message, “we may be back in court.”
“You can’t be telling people you need ID if you’re not actually requiring ID,” he said. “That advertising has to be modified to reflect reality.”
“Confusion is not a good thing on election day,” he said. “Confusion is going to mean some voters stay home. Confusion is going to mean that some poll workers get it wrong.”
Matthew Keeler, a spokesman for the Pennsylvania secretary of state, said the state is “pleased because the law itself hasn’t changed. What’s going on is there’s a soft rollout for the general election, just like the primary.”
Voters will still be asked for ID, he noted. If they don’t have it, they’ll be given information on how to get it.
Click Here to continue reading.
http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/
ter.
The court document and lawsuit, The American Tradition Institute Environmental Law Center v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator can be read here.
In the court documents, it notes, for instance, that one plaintiff, asthma-sufferer Landon Huffman, participated in human experiments several years ago that he was led to believe would “help people with asthma.”
Huffman, the documents note, “was not informed that the pollution EPA was forcing into his lungs could actually cause him to have an asthma attack. Nor was he ever given anything from EPA that would possibly relieve his asthma.”
One “obese woman with hypertension and pre-experiment evidence of cardiac irritability” was placed in a gas chamber and exposed to small particles “at levels far above what the EPA had published as safe.” She was later hospitalized.
Clearly these poor people were seen as expendable by this out-of-control government agency.
A medical ethicist named Dr. John Dale Dunn looked at the post-experiment results and was stunned by what he learned.
Said Dunn: “I am outraged and saddened to know that highly trained and expert physicians would be involved in scandalously unethical and immoral professional research, subjecting humans to toxic or lethal levels of small particles.”
Two other plaintiffs, Steven J. Milloy and Dr. David Schnare, had relatives in Nazi concentration camps. Milloy’s uncle, Zoran Galkanovic, who was incarcerated at the Mauthausen concentration camp, “was forced to … identify those individuals at the concentration camp too ill to work, knowing they would subsequently be executed.”
Located in Austria, the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp was known for unspeakable horrors that included all sorts of gruesome and deadly medical experiments.
Camp physician Hermann Richter “surgically removed significant organs – e.g., stomach, liver, or kidneys – from living prisoners solely in order to determine how long a prisoner could survive without the organ in question.”
It is because of what happened to his family member that Milloy has “(a)ccepted as a family responsibility the fight against any government who subjects its citizens to inhumane treatment.”
Dr. Schnare, meanwhile, worked for the EPA for 33 years and was shocked to learn of the illegal human experimentation by the EPA. He told the American Tradition Institute, based in Burke, Va., that he is a plaintiff because he “abhors current governmental experimentation on humans for the purposes of determining the effect of poisons.”
One new study, called CAPTAIN, is currently ongoing at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, believe it or not. CAPTAIN, according to court documents, “imposes a risk of immediate death from an acute exposure” to dangerous particulates.
The plaintiffs are seeking an end to CAPTAIN and other sinister experiments taking place in the Tarheel State and elsewhere, via the federal courts.
Meanwhile, the EPA scientists, it was revealed, conducted some potentially lethal experiments in Durham, North Carolina. “order(ing) human subjects be placed into a gas chamber and exposed to a lethal gas.” In this case, diesel exhaust.
Three days ago, U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), a ranking member on the Committee on Environment and Public Works, wrote a letter to that committee’s chairwoman, U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), addressing this shocking lawsuit.
Writes Inhofe, in his letter dated September 28th: “As I understand from the complaint, the EPA exposed dozens of human subjects, many of whom were health-impaired (e.g. asthma, metabolic syndrome, elderly) to concentrated high levels of substances like fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and diesel exhaust, which EPA has previously and officially determined can kill people and cause cancer.”
Inhofe continues: “It also appears that the EPA researchers failed to inform the institutional review board and the study subjects of its official  views concerning the lethality and toxicity of PM2.5 and diesel exhaust.”
Inhofe also tells Boxer that he would like the committee, which is responsible for EPA oversight, to “conduct hearings on this matter in the upcoming ‘lame-duck’ session.”
Inhofe also says that the EPA “may be held criminally liable for its conduct.”
We hope to have more on this story in the coming weeks.


Waiver Will be Required for Unvaccinated Students in California


Waiver Will be Required for Unvaccinated Students in California

By Jonathan Chontos
theintelhub.com

October 2, 2012
Governor Jerry Brown of California announced today that he had signed into law a measure which would require parents of children who don’t get vaccinated to obtain a waiver from a medical doctor, prior to enrolling their child in school.
Going into effect on January 1, 2014, the law changes certain key language associated with parents opting out of vaccinating their children, making it impossible for them to enroll their children in school without the newly required waiver.
This is in direct contrast to Governor Brown’s statement after signing the bill, in which he said it did not take away the ability to opt out, but gave parents the ability to better weigh the risks against the benefits of doing so.
The bill, which had gained support and opposition among various groups, seemed to be front and center as a result of a whooping cough epidemic in the United States which had not been seen for decades.
Ironically, Brown went on to say that these signature requirements do not apply to those who oppose vaccinations on a religious basis.
“I am signing AB 2109 and am directing the Department of Public Health to oversee this policy so parents are not overly burdened by its implementation.
Additionally, I will direct the department to allow for a separate religious exemption on the form. In this way, people whose religious beliefs preclude vaccinations will not be required to seek a health care practitioner’s signature.”
While the government of California has been rejoicing over this blatant trampling of parental rights, others, such as former “Saturday Night Live” star Rob Schneider, had a different opinion, stating it not only decreases the amount of control parents have over their child’s health and safety, but also raises costs for the family in general.
You can read the full text of the bill and original legislative proposal here.
cour� Y r � K P� ing illegal life-and-health-threatening scientific experiments on human subjects,” according to a JunkScience.com report from September 24th.
And Oklahoma’s senior senator, Tulsa’s Jim Inhofe, is demanding further answers from the EPA, in the meantime. Hearings are likely in coming weeks.
Suing the EPA and EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson is The American Tradition Institute Environmental Law Center.
This is in response to illegal human experiments involving the 2009 KINGCON study and the 2010 OMEGACON study and exposure to lethal levels of particulate matter.
The court document and lawsuit, The American Tradition Institute Environmental Law Center v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator can be read here.
In the court documents, it notes, for instance, that one plaintiff, asthma-sufferer Landon Huffman, participated in human experiments several years ago that he was led to believe would “help people with asthma.”
Huffman, the documents note, “was not informed that the pollution EPA was forcing into his lungs could actually cause him to have an asthma attack. Nor was he ever given anything from EPA that would possibly relieve his asthma.”
One “obese woman with hypertension and pre-experiment evidence of cardiac irritability” was placed in a gas chamber and exposed to small particles “at levels far above what the EPA had published as safe.” She was later hospitalized.
Clearly these poor people were seen as expendable by this out-of-control government agency.
A medical ethicist named Dr. John Dale Dunn looked at the post-experiment results and was stunned by what he learned.
Said Dunn: “I am outraged and saddened to know that highly trained and expert physicians would be involved in scandalously unethical and immoral professional research, subjecting humans to toxic or lethal levels of small particles.”
Two other plaintiffs, Steven J. Milloy and Dr. David Schnare, had relatives in Nazi concentration camps. Milloy’s uncle, Zoran Galkanovic, who was incarcerated at the Mauthausen concentration camp, “was forced to … identify those individuals at the concentration camp too ill to work, knowing they would subsequently be executed.”
Located in Austria, the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp was known for unspeakable horrors that included all sorts of gruesome and deadly medical experiments.
Camp physician Hermann Richter “surgically removed significant organs – e.g., stomach, liver, or kidneys – from living prisoners solely in order to determine how long a prisoner could survive without the organ in question.”
It is because of what happened to his family member that Milloy has “(a)ccepted as a family responsibility the fight against any government who subjects its citizens to inhumane treatment.”
Dr. Schnare, meanwhile, worked for the EPA for 33 years and was shocked to learn of the illegal human experimentation by the EPA. He told the American Tradition Institute, based in Burke, Va., that he is a plaintiff because he “abhors current governmental experimentation on humans for the purposes of determining the effect of poisons.”
One new study, called CAPTAIN, is currently ongoing at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, believe it or not. CAPTAIN, according to court documents, “imposes a risk of immediate death from an acute exposure” to dangerous particulates.
The plaintiffs are seeking an end to CAPTAIN and other sinister experiments taking place in the Tarheel State and elsewhere, via the federal courts.
Meanwhile, the EPA scientists, it was revealed, conducted some potentially lethal experiments in Durham, North Carolina. “order(ing) human subjects be placed into a gas chamber and exposed to a lethal gas.” In this case, diesel exhaust.
Three days ago, U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), a ranking member on the Committee on Environment and Public Works, wrote a letter to that committee’s chairwoman, U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), addressing this shocking lawsuit.
Writes Inhofe, in his letter dated September 28th: “As I understand from the complaint, the EPA exposed dozens of human subjects, many of whom were health-impaired (e.g. asthma, metabolic syndrome, elderly) to concentrated high levels of substances like fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and diesel exhaust, which EPA has previously and officially determined can kill people and cause cancer.”
Inhofe continues: “It also appears that the EPA researchers failed to inform the institutional review board and the study subjects of its official  views concerning the lethality and toxicity of PM2.5 and diesel exhaust.”
Inhofe also tells Boxer that he would like the committee, which is responsible for EPA oversight, to “conduct hearings on this matter in the upcoming ‘lame-duck’ session.”
Inhofe also says that the EPA “may be held criminally liable for its conduct.”
We hope to have more on this story in the coming weeks.


EPA’s Monstrous “Illegal Human Experiments”


Inhofe Seeks Hearings Addressing the EPA’s Monstrous “Illegal Human Experiments”

By Andrew W. GriffinRed Dirt Report, editor
theintelhub.com
October 2, 2012
OKLAHOMA CITY – Just days after Red Dirt Report featured a story out of St. Louis, Mo. addressing the shocking revelation that the U.S. Army was conducting secret experiments on citizens of that city without their knowledge in the 1950’s -by spraying toxic substances on them – we learn that potentially deadly human experimentation is taking place this very day – and sanctioned by the U.S. government, no less!
While those Cold War-era tests – some believed to include radiological substances, primarily on lower-income, inner-city folks – took place more than 50 years ago in St. Louis, Corpus Christi, Texas and elsewhere, we learn that the Environmental Protection Agency is currently being sued in federal court for “conducting illegal life-and-health-threatening scientific experiments on human subjects,” according to a JunkScience.com report from September 24th.
And Oklahoma’s senior senator, Tulsa’s Jim Inhofe, is demanding further answers from the EPA, in the meantime. Hearings are likely in coming weeks.
Suing the EPA and EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson is The American Tradition Institute Environmental Law Center.
This is in response to illegal human experiments involving the 2009 KINGCON study and the 2010 OMEGACON study and exposure to lethal levels of particulate matter.
The court document and lawsuit, The American Tradition Institute Environmental Law Center v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator can be read here.
In the court documents, it notes, for instance, that one plaintiff, asthma-sufferer Landon Huffman, participated in human experiments several years ago that he was led to believe would “help people with asthma.”
Huffman, the documents note, “was not informed that the pollution EPA was forcing into his lungs could actually cause him to have an asthma attack. Nor was he ever given anything from EPA that would possibly relieve his asthma.”
One “obese woman with hypertension and pre-experiment evidence of cardiac irritability” was placed in a gas chamber and exposed to small particles “at levels far above what the EPA had published as safe.” She was later hospitalized.
Clearly these poor people were seen as expendable by this out-of-control government agency.
A medical ethicist named Dr. John Dale Dunn looked at the post-experiment results and was stunned by what he learned.
Said Dunn: “I am outraged and saddened to know that highly trained and expert physicians would be involved in scandalously unethical and immoral professional research, subjecting humans to toxic or lethal levels of small particles.”
Two other plaintiffs, Steven J. Milloy and Dr. David Schnare, had relatives in Nazi concentration camps. Milloy’s uncle, Zoran Galkanovic, who was incarcerated at the Mauthausen concentration camp, “was forced to … identify those individuals at the concentration camp too ill to work, knowing they would subsequently be executed.”
Located in Austria, the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp was known for unspeakable horrors that included all sorts of gruesome and deadly medical experiments.
Camp physician Hermann Richter “surgically removed significant organs – e.g., stomach, liver, or kidneys – from living prisoners solely in order to determine how long a prisoner could survive without the organ in question.”
It is because of what happened to his family member that Milloy has “(a)ccepted as a family responsibility the fight against any government who subjects its citizens to inhumane treatment.”
Dr. Schnare, meanwhile, worked for the EPA for 33 years and was shocked to learn of the illegal human experimentation by the EPA. He told the American Tradition Institute, based in Burke, Va., that he is a plaintiff because he “abhors current governmental experimentation on humans for the purposes of determining the effect of poisons.”
One new study, called CAPTAIN, is currently ongoing at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, believe it or not. CAPTAIN, according to court documents, “imposes a risk of immediate death from an acute exposure” to dangerous particulates.
The plaintiffs are seeking an end to CAPTAIN and other sinister experiments taking place in the Tarheel State and elsewhere, via the federal courts.
Meanwhile, the EPA scientists, it was revealed, conducted some potentially lethal experiments in Durham, North Carolina. “order(ing) human subjects be placed into a gas chamber and exposed to a lethal gas.” In this case, diesel exhaust.
Three days ago, U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), a ranking member on the Committee on Environment and Public Works, wrote a letter to that committee’s chairwoman, U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), addressing this shocking lawsuit.
Writes Inhofe, in his letter dated September 28th: “As I understand from the complaint, the EPA exposed dozens of human subjects, many of whom were health-impaired (e.g. asthma, metabolic syndrome, elderly) to concentrated high levels of substances like fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and diesel exhaust, which EPA has previously and officially determined can kill people and cause cancer.”
Inhofe continues: “It also appears that the EPA researchers failed to inform the institutional review board and the study subjects of its official  views concerning the lethality and toxicity of PM2.5 and diesel exhaust.”
Inhofe also tells Boxer that he would like the committee, which is responsible for EPA oversight, to “conduct hearings on this matter in the upcoming ‘lame-duck’ session.”
Inhofe also says that the EPA “may be held criminally liable for its conduct.”
We hope to have more on this story in the coming weeks.


How British News Media Looks At Us


Please be aware that these are from England's media!


From England . . . . . Interesting that the British easily see what our News Media seems blind to






Cartoons are getting tough in Europe BUT NOT IN THE USA !!! Funny that foreign newspapers will print what our media will not.












































Iceland’s Economy now growing faster than the U.S. and EU after arresting corrupt bankers


Iceland’s Economy now growing faster than the U.S. and EU after arresting corrupt bankers

156 Comments
Iceland’s Economy now growing faster than the U.S. and EU after arresting corrupt bankers
So Iceland decided not to follow the rest of the world by bailing out the bankers. Instead, they chose to arrest them. Now their economy is recovering faster than the EU and the United States. Hmmmm.
Remember when the United States government told the American people that immediate action was required to save the banks, and save our nation from complete collapse? An action in the form of Billions of dollars of National Debt? Yeah, we remember that! Now Trillions of dollars in National debt later, we are in the same position we were in 4 years ago, just more debt. As a matter of fact Federal Reserve Chairmen Ben Bernanke has called for yet another stimulus that will add more debt onto the mountain we already have.
At the start of the world wide 2008 economic collapse, Iceland was in worse shape than almost any other country in the world. Now they are one of the fastest growing economies in the world.
Imagine what America would be like today if we bailed out the victims of poor banking practices, while punishing the bankers who were responsible?
After watching this video tell us what you think? Was Iceland off their rocker for sending the bankers to jail, or on to something that America should have done as well?
Published by the 
Iceland’s Economy now growing faster than the U.S. and EU after arresting corrupt bankers.

A Graphical Look at the Obama Presidency


If You Voted For Obama In 2008 To Prove You Were Not A Racist: You’ll Have To Vote For Someone Else In 2012 To Prove You’re Not An Idiot!


Here is a graphical look at the Obama (Barry Soetoro) Presidency.
“If you voted for Obama in 2008 to prove you are not a racist, you will have to vote for someone else in 2012 to prove you are not an idiot.”


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So, are you going to be a smart voter in November or prove to everyone you are an idiot by voting for Barry Soetoro (alias Barack Obama)?
Do a Google search on his REAL name: Barry Soetoro. Then ask yourself, “How did this fraud, this liar, this despicable man ever get into the White House?”

Current Opinions Of News
  


The America in which we live...

This sort of renders one speechless.
The America in which we live...


Confusing isn't it................

3rd Party Debate by Drake

3rd Party Debate

by Drake

Go here to download the entire 3rd party presidential debate.
rt.com
There's a blackout by the mainstream media and the US political elite on coverage of third parties, ...
Drake | October 24, 2012 at 2:49 pm | Categories: News | URL: http://wp.me/p2tRr3-uh