Waiver Will be Required for Unvaccinated Students in California

By Jonathan Chontos
theintelhub.com
October 2, 2012

Governor Jerry Brown of California announced today that he had signed into law a measure which would require parents of children who don’t get vaccinated to obtain a waiver from a medical doctor, prior to enrolling their child in school.
Going into effect on January 1, 2014, the law changes certain key language associated with parents opting out of vaccinating their children, making it impossible for them to enroll their children in school without the newly required waiver.
This is in direct contrast to Governor Brown’s statement after signing the bill, in which he said it did not take away the ability to opt out, but gave parents the ability to better weigh the risks against the benefits of doing so.
The bill, which had gained support and opposition among various groups, seemed to be front and center as a result of a whooping cough epidemic in the United States which had not been seen for decades.
Ironically, Brown went on to say that these signature requirements do not apply to those who oppose vaccinations on a religious basis.
“I am signing AB 2109 and am directing the Department of Public Health to oversee this policy so parents are not overly burdened by its implementation.
Additionally, I will direct the department to allow for a separate religious exemption on the form. In this way, people whose religious beliefs preclude vaccinations will not be required to seek a health care practitioner’s signature.”
While the government of California has been rejoicing over this blatant trampling of parental rights, others, such as former “Saturday Night Live” star Rob Schneider, had a different opinion, stating it not only decreases the amount of control parents have over their child’s health and safety, but also raises costs for the family in general.

You can read the full text of the bill and original legislative proposal here.

cour� Y r � K P� ing illegal life-and-health-threatening scientific experiments on human subjects,” according to a JunkScience.com report from September 24^th.

And Oklahoma’s senior senator, Tulsa’s Jim Inhofe, is demanding further answers from the EPA, in the meantime. Hearings are likely in coming weeks.

Suing the EPA and EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson is The American Tradition Institute Environmental Law Center.
This is in response to illegal human experiments involving the 2009 KINGCON study and the 2010 OMEGACON study and exposure to lethal levels of particulate matter.

The court document and lawsuit, The American Tradition Institute Environmental Law Center v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator can be read here.

In the court documents, it notes, for instance, that one plaintiff, asthma-sufferer Landon Huffman, participated in human experiments several years ago that he was led to believe would “help people with asthma.”
Huffman, the documents note, “was not informed that the pollution EPA was forcing into his lungs could actually cause him to have an asthma attack. Nor was he ever given anything from EPA that would possibly relieve his asthma.”
One “obese woman with hypertension and pre-experiment evidence of cardiac irritability” was placed in a gas chamber and exposed to small particles “at levels far above what the EPA had published as safe.” She was later hospitalized.
Clearly these poor people were seen as expendable by this out-of-control government agency.
A medical ethicist named Dr. John Dale Dunn looked at the post-experiment results and was stunned by what he learned.
Said Dunn: “I am outraged and saddened to know that highly trained and expert physicians would be involved in scandalously unethical and immoral professional research, subjecting humans to toxic or lethal levels of small particles.”
Two other plaintiffs, Steven J. Milloy and Dr. David Schnare, had relatives in Nazi concentration camps. Milloy’s uncle, Zoran Galkanovic, who was incarcerated at the Mauthausen concentration camp, “was forced to … identify those individuals at the concentration camp too ill to work, knowing they would subsequently be executed.”

Located in Austria, the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp was known for unspeakable horrors that included all sorts of gruesome and deadly medical experiments.

Camp physician Hermann Richter “surgically removed significant organs – e.g., stomach, liver, or kidneys – from living prisoners solely in order to determine how long a prisoner could survive without the organ in question.”
It is because of what happened to his family member that Milloy has “(a)ccepted as a family responsibility the fight against any government who subjects its citizens to inhumane treatment.”
Dr. Schnare, meanwhile, worked for the EPA for 33 years and was shocked to learn of the illegal human experimentation by the EPA. He told the American Tradition Institute, based in Burke, Va., that he is a plaintiff because he “abhors current governmental experimentation on humans for the purposes of determining the effect of poisons.”
One new study, called CAPTAIN, is currently ongoing at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, believe it or not. CAPTAIN, according to court documents, “imposes a risk of immediate death from an acute exposure” to dangerous particulates.
The plaintiffs are seeking an end to CAPTAIN and other sinister experiments taking place in the Tarheel State and elsewhere, via the federal courts.
Meanwhile, the EPA scientists, it was revealed, conducted some potentially lethal experiments in Durham, North Carolina. “order(ing) human subjects be placed into a gas chamber and exposed to a lethal gas.” In this case, diesel exhaust.
Three days ago, U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), a ranking member on the Committee on Environment and Public Works, wrote a letter to that committee’s chairwoman, U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), addressing this shocking lawsuit.

Writes Inhofe, in his letter dated September 28^th: “As I understand from the complaint, the EPA exposed dozens of human subjects, many of whom were health-impaired (e.g. asthma, metabolic syndrome, elderly) to concentrated high levels of substances like fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and diesel exhaust, which EPA has previously and officially determined can kill people and cause cancer.”

Inhofe continues: “It also appears that the EPA researchers failed to inform the institutional review board and the study subjects of its official  views concerning the lethality and toxicity of PM2.5 and diesel exhaust.”
Inhofe also tells Boxer that he would like the committee, which is responsible for EPA oversight, to “conduct hearings on this matter in the upcoming ‘lame-duck’ session.”
Inhofe also says that the EPA “may be held criminally liable for its conduct.”
We hope to have more on this story in the coming weeks.