THIS IS THE TRUE FLAG OF THE REPUBLIC, THROW THAT OTHER EVIL RAG AWAY!!!





Monday, October 29, 2012

Structure of the Birth Certificate


FORT FAIRFIELD JOURNAL
Real.  Educational.  News.
Fort Fairfield Journal                                  Contact Us                            Bible Reference                       Our Library
Advanced Civics Research Library

Structure of the Birth Certificate
Did the State Pledge Your Body to a Bank?

Right:  Some birth and marriage certificates are now "warehouse receipts," printed on banknote paper, which may mark you and yours as 'chattel' property of the banks that our government borrows from every day.



By:  David Deschesne
Editor, Fort Fairfield Journal
Fort Fairfield Journal, May 11, 2005
A certificate is a "paper establishing an ownership claim." - Barron's Dictionary of Banking Terms.  Registration of births began in 1915, by the Bureau of Census, with all states adopting the practice by 1933.
Birth and marriage certificates are a form of securities called "warehouse receipts."  The items included on a warehouse receipt, as descried at §7-202 of the Uniform Commercial Code, the law which governs commercial paper and transactions, which parallel a birth or marriage certificate are:
-the location of the warehouse where the goods are stored...(residence)
-the date of issue of the receipt.....("Date issued")
-the consecutive number of the receipt...(found on back or front of the certificate, usually in red numbers)
-a description of the goods or of the packages containing them...(name, sex, date of birth, etc.)
-the signature of the warehouseman, which may be made by his authorized agent...(municipal clerk or state registrar's signature)
Birth/marriage certificates now appear to at least qualify as "warehouse receipts" under the Uniform Commercial Code.  Black's Law Dictionary, 7th ed. defines:
warehouse receipt. "...A warehouse receipt, which is considered a document of title, may be a negotiable instrument and is often used for financing with inventory as security."
Since the U.S. went bankrupt in 1933, all new money has to be borrowed into existence.  All states started issuing serial-numbered, certificated "warehouse receipts" for births and marriages in order to pledge us as collateral against those loans and municipal bonds taken out with the Federal Reserve's banks.  The "Full faith and Credit" of the American people is said to be that which back the nation's debt.  That simply means the American people's ability to labor and pay back that debt.  In order to catalog its laborers, the government needed an efficient, methodical system of tracking its property to that end.  Humans today are looked upon merely as resources - "human resources," that is.
Governmental assignment of a dollar value to the heads of citizens began on July 14, 1862 when President Lincoln offered 6 percent interest bearing-bonds to states who freed their slaves on a "per head" basis.  This practice of valuating humans (cattle?) continues today with our current system of debt-based currency reliant upon a steady stream of fresh new chattels to back it.
Additional Birth Certificate Research
Federal Children
 by Joyce Rosenwald
In 1921, the federal Sheppard-Towner Maternity Act created the birth "registration" or what we now know as the "birth certificate." It was known as the "Maternity Act" and was sold to the American people as a law that would reduce maternal and infant mortality, protect the health of mothers and infants, and for "other purposes." One of those other purposes provided for the establishment of a federal bureau designed to cooperate with state agencies in the overseeing of its operations and expenditures. What it really did was create a federal birth registry which exists today, creating "federal children." This government, under the doctrine of "Parens Patriae," now legislates for American children as if they are owned by the federal government. Through the public school enrollment process and continuing license requirements for most aspects of daily life, these children grow up to be adults indoctrinated into the process of asking for "permission" from Daddy government to do all those things necessary to carry out daily activities that exist in what is called a "free country."
Before 1921 the records of births and names of children were entered into family bibles, as were the records of marriages and deaths. These records were readily accepted by both the family and the law as "official" records. Since 1921 the American people have been registering the births and names of their children with the government of the state in which they are born, even though there is no federal law requiring it. The state tells you that registering your child's birth through the birth certificate serves as proof that he/she was born in the united States , thereby making him/her a United States Citizen. For the past several years a social security number has been mandated by the federal government to be issued at birth.
In 1933, bankruptcy was declared by President Roosevelt. The governors of the then 48 States pledged the "full faith and credit" of their states, including the citizenry, as collateral for loans of credit from the Federal Reserve system. To wit:"Full faith and credit" clause of Const. U.S. article 4. sec. 1, requires that foreign judgement be given such faith and credit as it had by law or usage of state of it's origin. That foreign statutes are to have force and effect to which they are entitled in home state. And that a judgement or record shall have the same faith, credit, conclusive effect, and obligatory force in other states as it has by law or usage in the state from whence taken.
Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed. cites omitted.
The state claims an interest in every child within it's jurisdiction. The state will, if it deems it necessary, nullify your parental rights and appoint a guardian (trustee) over your children. The subject of every birth certificate is a child. The child is a valuable asset, which if properly trained, can contribute valuable assets provided by its labor for many years. It is presumed by those who have researched this issue, that the child itself is the asset of the trust established by the birth certificate, and the social security number is the numbering or registration of the trust, allowing for the assets of the trust to be tracked. If this information is true, your child is now owned by the state. Each one of us, including our children, are considered assets of the bankrupt united states. We are now designated by this government as "HUMAN RESOURCES," with a new crop born every year."
In 1923, a suit was brought against federal officials charged with the administration of the maternity act, who were citizens of another state, to enjoin them from enforcing it, wherein the plaintiff averred that the act was unconstitutional, and that it's purpose was to induce the States to yield sovereign rights reserved by them through the federal Constitution's 10th amendment and not granted to the federal government, and that the burden of the appropriations falls unequally upon the several States, held, that, as the statute does not require the plaintiff to do or yield anything, and as no burden is imposed by it other than that of taxation, which falls, not on the State but on her inhabitants, who are within the federal as well as the state taxing power, the complaint resolves down to the naked contention that Congress has usurped reserved powers of the States by the mere enactment of the statute, though nothing has been, or is to be, done under it without their consent (Commonwealth of Massachusetts vs. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.; Frothingham v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury et.al..) Mr. Alexander Lincoln, Assistant Attorney General, argued for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts . To wit:
I. The act is unconstitutional. It purports to vest in agencies of the Federal Government powers which are almost wholly undefined, in matters relating to maternity and infancy, and to authorize appropriations of federal funds for the purposes of the act.
Many examples may be given and were stated in the debates on the bill in Congress of regulations which may be imposed under the act. THE FORCED REGISTRATION OF PREGNANCY, GOVERNMENTAL PRENATAL EXAMINATION OF EXPECTANT MOTHERS, RESTRICTIONS ON THE RIGHT OF A WOMAN TO SECURE THE SERVICES OF A MIDWIFE OR PHYSICIAN OF HER OWN SELECTION, are measures to which the people of those States which accept its provisions may be subjected. There is nothing which prohibits the payment of subsidies out of federal appropriations. INSURANCE OF MOTHERS MAY BE MADE COMPULSORY. THE TEACHING OF BIRTH CONTROL AND PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF PERSONS ABOUT TO MARRY MAY BE REQUIRED.
By section 4 of the act, the Children's Bureau is given all necessary powers to cooperate with the state agencies in the administration of the act. Hence it is given the power to assist in the enforcement of the plans submitted to it, and for that purpose by its agents to go into the several States and to do those acts for which the plans submitted may provide. As to what those plans shall provide, the final arbiters are the Bureau and the Board. THE FACT THAT IT WAS CONSIDERED NECESSARY IN EXPLICIT TERMS TO PRESERVE FROM INVASION BY FEDERAL OFFICIALS THE RIGHT OF THE PARENT TO THE CUSTODY AND CARE OF HIS CHILD AND THE SANCTITY OF HIS HOME SHOWS HOW FAR REACHING ARE THE POWERS WHICH WERE INTENDED TO BE GRANTED BY THE ACT.
(1) The act is invalid because it assumes powers not granted to Congress and usurps the local police power. McCulloch v. Maryland , 4 Wheat. 316, 405; United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 549-551.
In more recent cases, however, the Court has shown that there are limits to the power of Congress to pass legislation purporting to be based on one of the powers expressly granted to Congress which in fact usurps the reserved powers of the States, and that laws showing on their face detailed regulation of a matter wholly within the police power of the States will be held to be unconstitutional although they purport to be passed in the exercise of some constitutional power. Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S. 251; Child Labor Tax Case, 259 U.S. 20; Hill v. Wallace, 259 U.S. 44.
The act is not made valid by the circumstance that federal powers are to be exercised only with respect to those States which accept the act, for Congress cannot assume, and state legislatures cannot yield, the powers reserved to the States by the Constitution. Message of President Monroe, May 4, 1822 ; 4 Elliot's Debates, p. 525; Pollard's Lessee v. Hagan, 3 How. 212; Escanaba Co. v. Chicago , 107 U.S. 678; Coyle v. Oklahoma , 221 U.S. 559; Cincinnati v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co., 223 U.S. 390.
(2) The act is invalid because it imposes on each State an illegal option either to yield a part of its powers reserved by the Tenth Amendment or to give up its share of appropriations under the act. A statute attempting, by imposing conditions upon a general privilege, to exact a waiver of a constitutional right, is null and void. Harrison v. St. Louis & San Francisco R.R. Co., 232 U.S. 318; Terral v. Burke Construction Co., 257 U.S. 529.
(3) The act is invalid because it sets up a system of government by cooperation between the Federal Government and certain of the States, not provided by the Constitution. Congress cannot make laws for the States, and it cannot delegate to the States the power to make laws for the United States . In re Rahrer, 140 U.S. 545; Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Stewart, 253 U.S. 149; Opinion of the Justices, 239 Mass. 606.
The Maternity Act was eventually repealed, but parts of it have been found in other legislative acts. What this act attempted to do was set up government by appointment, run by bureaucrats with re-delegated authority to tax, which is in itself unconstitutional. What was once declared as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of this nation in the past should be upheld in a court challenge today. The constitution hasn't changed. What has changed is the way this government views human life. Today we are defined as human resources, believed to be owned by government. The government now wants us, as individuals, to be tagged and tracked. Government mandated or legislated National I.D. is unconstitutional anyway you look at it. Federal jurisdiction to legislate for the several states does not exist and could never survive a court challenge as shown above. Writing letters to elected public servants won't save us when we all know their agenda does not include serving those who placed them in power. Perhaps the 10th amendment of the federal constitution guaranteeing states rights will, if challenged, when making it known that we as individuals of the several states will not be treated as chattel of the U.S. government. If the federal government believes they own us, and as such have the right to demand national I.D. cards, and health I.D. cards, which will in truth tag us as we tag our animals, then let them bring forth the documents to prove their authority to legislate for it. If our G-D given rights to liberty and freedom, which were the foundation upon which this nation was created do not exist, and liberty and freedom is only an illusion under which the American people suffer, then let the governments of this nation come forward and tell the people. But...if we are indeed free, then we should not have to plead or beg before our elected public servants to be treated as such. If, in truth we are not free, then perhaps it's time to let the final chapter of the Great American Revolution be written..........

5 comments:

  1. To the one who is constantly pushing up Tim Turner: Tim Turner is in fact a liar and a fraud, a disinformation agent and a bad actor. All of the above suffice.

    Drake isn't much better, but in truth at least Drake is trying to get the truth to the public - even when he is fed wrong data.


    The truth is that yes, you are NOT the LEGAL FICTION posted on U.S. Birth Certificates which claims it is a living person.

    The PERSON on your Birth Certificate is deceased, and a fiction. This is something Tim Turner never teaches anyone nor would he.

    Secondly, you are under no obligation to contract with any entity - and the Birth Certificate is a Trust account - it is a corporate entity.

    The certificate itself is a corporation.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CphbPm8r9jY&feature=related

    Thirdly, you are under no obligation to pay any taxes at all if you never contract with the legal fiction to PAY TAXES. Which all that means, is you have to sign your name in all CAPS multiple times; and legally agree to be bound to the contract of the Birth Certificate which contains the trademarked ALL CAPITAL NAME.


    Fourthly, you should never send them anything nor bother them with some kind of piece of metal, your own currency, or anything at all in fact - something Tim Turner never taught. Turner states you need to send them your own instrument to pay taxes, own your own laws and your own "Republic."


    This is all garbage!!
    There is no laws, only codes and statutes. Never has been since the CORPORATE FICTION took over decades & decades ago.

    You do not need to go to them for ANYTHING....EVER. But by doing it and contracting with entities using an ALL CAPS NAME, you basically do tell them you desire friendly slavery.


    What you can in fact do, is learn to file binding separation from your "PERSON" account estate. This permanently makes you a manager of your Estate, and divorces you from its liabilities. This also makes it so you can dismiss the "LEGAL FICTION" system of law, and live as a Free Man eventually, once you cease paying things using debt notes.


    They don't want you to know any of this, but it does not matter. It is what the truth is. It is something that no galactics, Tim Turner or anyone else is ever going to tell you - because basically it is how to escape.

    Learn it, study it, ENFORCE it.
    YOU have the power, not the completely fictitious corporation. Tim Turner deceives, and will never say this.

    But because so many enjoy being slaves, they will throw up smoke screens and continue to agree to be the Pharoah's livestock by simply voluntarily contracting with it.

    If you truly understand what a contract is, then you simply recognize you have UNKNOWINGLY contracted with a fiction since birth. Your ALL CAPS NAME is that fiction. When you get your ducks in a row on that one, then & only then, can you permanently exit this FEMA camp fraud & once and for all be left alone to contract with only people you like.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I will only comment on one fact; fourth sentence down Anonymous stated "it" is a DEAD entity. That is correct, but needs clarity. Under the law and treaties DEATH and DEBT mean exactly the same thing. Many early treaties you'll discover that certain ambassadors were assigned their position to deal with the "death" of the United States.

      That is my only comment for now; time is short.

      Doug Duff

      Delete
    2. It is a DEBTOR bottom line - by signing yourself/contracting with any of these you agree to be the DEBTOR.


      You are using their money, their game, their rules - which means they have the right to do anything they want to you.


      When you are not using their money, rules or game - you are NOT a debtor and in turn they have no rights on you. They can't even contact you.


      That is how insane it truly is, the ALL CAPS NAME is a fiction and a DEBTOR. They want all its assets. They want absolutely nothing from you since you're collateral.

      If you're divorced from the Matrix, they even pretend you don't exist anymore. You show up anywhere in their system, they observe you like an unknown "glitch" while you continue to contract with other parties as natural person. So it really comes down to are you a slave or freeman, do you use debt or legal tender, anything in between is false.

      Delete
  2. Also, the Maternity Act, Federal Reserve Act, Act and countless other Acts are just parts of the MATRIX.


    You do not have to be part of any of these if you don't want to be. All you do is divorce yourself from the ALL CAPS NAME, these companies are pretending is you.

    But if you love shopping at Macys, greed, going to Disney World or pretty much any of those such things....then you are pretty much forced to be an ENTITLED corporate legal fiction.

    Which is fine, good slavery is for you while it's not for the other people.


    The only way to continue having these privileges and remain outside the Matrix....is by divorcing yourself from your Estate.

    Then as an Authorized Agent, choosing to temporarily contract with that corporation - without giving them any authority. If you are temporarily going to these places, buying their services and so on, on your terms; you are not giving them any authority.

    If you tell them "Do you understand?" they are forced to honor the request...Because that means they stand under you.

    However you shouldn't have any desire for things like Disney World if you are a free man, this is what many millions of people are going to realize. Being free means truly being free, not chasing after the possessions of society.

    Owning something you bought with silver is better than going to an amusement park. It will never be taken away, because it retains value.

    Versus ordering something from a department store or other enterprise, since it is only something you rent or borrow. Meaning they can take all that away, the second they decided to destroy your legal fiction & card.

    So it really is worthless.
    Be smart...Look up how to be a "Free man" if that is your path.

    Any other road leads to sorrow.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Today I learn about birth certificates in the United Kingdom.A birth certificate is a vital way of recording the birth of a new baby. It also helps countries and local councils keep a close check on the population growth. There are two forms to which the term birth certificate can refer to. The first is known as the original document, the second is a certified copy which represents the original record of birth.
    The birth certificate gives the individual an official identity from the moment it is born. Since 1827 the registering of births and also deaths and marriages has been common practice in the United Kingdom. Initially there were no fines for not registering the arrival of a new baby boy or girl, that however, changed before long because keeping an eye on the changes in population numbers, gave a better indication of the spending required in the coming years ahead, in terms of education, transport, and any the availability of manpower, should the need arise. Possibly due to Britain's acquisition of countries it called its commonwealth, the racial mix of the British population was very varied. Every birth certificate from the United Kingdom, will include details about the birth, such as the name and gender of the child, the name(s) of the parents, even sometimes the race of the baby is required. Crucially details like date of birth and location of birth add up to make up the identity of the person.

    ReplyDelete