Wednesday, February 19, 2014

A Call To A Texas Radio Station

A Call To A Texas Radio Station

WELFARE ABUSE: 32 years old Austin, TX welfare recipient says working is stupid.



Date: Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:26 PM

This is a huge part of what is wrong with America!

Listen to this actual  call to a Texas radio station. It will make you sick.  But keep in mind, we elected the people who made this possible. 
PASS THIS TO THE WORLD...

Just click on the link below:

 http://safeshare.tv/w/csrqsTAmSx      Listen to this!







America's Fastest-Growing Drug Problem

America's Fastest-Growing Drug Problem

The American people want a miracle pill that they can just pop into their mouth to knock out disease (which will NEVER happen). The American people want this because a miracle pill would allow them to keep living lavishly and frivolously while eating their beloved degenerate, denatured and devalued Standard American Diet.

No pill will ever knock out (cure) any disease. A single pill didn't cause the pathology. It was the thought process (mindset), diet and lifestyle (or death style) of the person that caused the pathology. And yes, consuming various or multiple pills (drugs) plays a role in the development of pathology. Disease is multidimensional and not one-dimensional. Unfortunately for Western allopathic medicine, they treat disease in a one dimensional way.

Drugs become personalities in new marketing push
Big Pharma is starting to give a personality to its drugs in order to push revenues towards its annual sales target of $1.3 trillion by 2018.

Personality traits such as dependable, optimistic and elegant are being used to encourage people to want a specific drug.

Much of this new marketing spin is happening in the US where direct-to-consumer advertising is permitted. It’s hoped that consumers will then ask the doctor to prescribe the ‘dependable’ drug.

Fifteen well-known drugs, such as Viagra, Lipitor and Prozac, are being given ‘brand personalities,’ say researchers from the John Molson business school, a technique that has been used for years by Apple, Coca-Cola and other major manufacturers.

The personalities have two aspects: competence and innovation. So as well as being dependable, drugs are also being promoted as unique and original. This new marketing strategy is a necessary next step for Big Pharma as it moves towards global annual sales of $1.3 trillion by 2018 in the face of stiff competition from generics and tough regulation. (Source: Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2013; 30: 583)


Regarding the UCC

From: legal_reality
Subj: Regarding the UCC

18 February A.D. 2014

We have always had two levels of marketplaces: State (now STATE) and national.  The UCC guts the definition of "dollar" in the State-turned-STATE marketplaces.  The UCC is STATE "law."  It's the State-turned-STATE counterpart to the gutting of "dollar" in the U.S. Code, which language shenanigans gutted the definition of "dollar" for purposes of the national marketplace.

Where "dollar" (the "unit of account") is gutted, it's legally impossible to maintain a Common Law based system.  And, this is the long and the short of the reason/purpose of the UCC.  It's the State-law parallel to what was also necessary at the national level to usher in The Fourth Reich and its "funny money"-based "choice of law."


Some on the List are aware of a note from a source that "modified" a Legal Reality note sent out recently, which Legal Reality note exposed and challenged a Court-bashing position that looked to McCulloch v. Maryland.  The "modifications" to the Legal Reality note didn't really alter the original that much, although there was no indication of what was modified, so that the nth-level of forwarding later, the recipient really doesn't know what the original said or how it originally appeared or how to contact the original author to get a copy of the original. 

What that "modified" note did do was so promote the UCC as to leave the reader trying to hold two directly opposing positions as true simultaneously.  That's how the communist (Hegelian) dialectic operates to leave minds in a condition of logical mush and incompetence.

For these reasons, a new concept is added at the foot of these notes, starting with this one.  The alternative is to circulate .pdf files as attachments, and since those are "heavy" on memory usage, that option is being delayed as long as possible.

To address those UCC-oriented concepts, they miss the boat completely regarding our present reality, and therefore a moment is taken while the topic is in mind in order to address briefly that angle of our present legal situation.

A great deal is talked about regarding the UCC (Uniform Commercial Code).  To hit the highlights, there's one and only one reason for the UCC -- to change the "choice of law" in the States from the Common Law to the maritime law necessary for The Fourth Reich and its STATEs.  There's a great deal more than that singular change found in the body of each STATE's rendition of the UCC, but changing that "choice of law" is by far the main purpose of anything about the UCC.  All else in/with the UCC has provided a wonderful cover story.

Under the Common Law, the "unit of account" is a "dollar," which is defined as a weight measured by grains of fine silver.

Under our present maritime system reality, the "unit of account" is completely undefined.

To unhinge this entire system from the Common Law, two marketplaces had to be corrupted, not just one: (1) the national marketplace, which is subject to the "Laws of the United States," and (2) the State marketplaces, which were subject to the "Laws of the (respective) States."

To usher in The Fourth Reich, it was not enough to dismantle the "choice of law" in the national marketplace, which was done by rendering "dollar" a very circular, thus undefined, concept, which we find in Title 31 ("dollar" means 100 cents; one cent is 1/100th of a "dollar"). There could not be a Fourth Reich (in North America, and in any other location in which "funny money" circulates freely) without also corrupting the State marketplaces.  In order to accomplish that secondary step, along came the UCC.

The UCC defines "money" but not any "unit of account," e.g., "dollar."  By including the "funny money" ("federal reserve notes") in the definition of "money," the States became STATEs, i.e., commercial entities in the "place" called "this state," which is geographically pictured as "United States" without any State boundary lines. 

(In "this state," each STATE is but a "county" within "this state.")

Thus, to picture the UCC as anything more than that is to miss the (entire) point of the UCC.  The concept of "dollar" was removed from the national marketplace via the shenanigans with Title 31, and from each State marketplace via the UCC.

In this way, both (all) marketplaces were functioning in the very same "choice of law," a choice of law that ushered in The Fourth Reich.

Since the legal mechanism isn't yet part of the general, common understanding in the marketplace (the understanding of which mechanism is simplified as "federal" means "federal" and which isn't really in mind shy of a rather lengthy study of the foundational principles on which this present commercial ("federal") system depends), it's still "foreign" to common discussions (about the UCC, in particular, and about the system, generally) as to why the UCC is 99.9% irrelevant.  While the UCC deals in the world of "contract law," it has very, very, very little to do with the world of "trust law," except that it has allowed the use of "funny money" instead of honest weights and measures for all commercial purposes.  Thus, a trust may be recognized in "this state" where the "choice of law" is that provided by the use of "funny money."

There are a great many minds enamored with the UCC, and there is a great deal of legit legal work relevant to the UCC that goes on every day. This author's litigation career right out of law school was very heavy in applying the UCC.  There's a place for it, to be sure.  However, as for the matters that vex us, there is no real value in the study of the UCC beyond coming to terms with the effectiveness in changing the "choice of law" by obliterating the notion of "unit of account" and substituting, instead, a definition of "money."

"Dollar" and "money" are related, but one is a "unit of account," and the other is what passes as a "medium of exchange."  Where there's no "unit of account," there is no Common Law system.  Period.

In fact, to understand the foundational "choice of law" concept is to learn that one of the matters over which one should strive to take full control is "choice of law," and one who intends to get loose from the voluntary bondage of "this state" will run like mad away from the notion of bringing in the UCC at every turn.  In other words, to use the UCC and to advocate the use of the UCC is to stick oneself to this present "funny money" system in such a way as to render oneself mummified in that form of flypaper.

The UCC accomplishes for the State-turned-STATE marketplaces what the shenanigans with Title 31 did to/with the national marketplace.  Those "statutes" completely gutted the definition of "dollar."  In no marketplace associated with "United States" is there a definition of the stated "unit of account."  In other words, in no marketplace associated with "United States" is "dollar" anywhere defined (competently).  Where there is no "unit of account," it's impossible to have a Common Law system, and that result is exactly what is at the heart of the UCC.  The UCC guts the definition of "dollar" in the States-turned-STATEs, which makes it possible, then, for "funny money" to circulate in those marketplaces, as well.  The thing, then, to understand about the UCC is this:  it's the UCC that turns a State into a STATE.

This is "all" that the UCC does.  There's quite a bit to the UCC, and for one's commercial activity in "this state," one does well to have a working knowledge of the UCC (relevant to the STATE in which one does business).  But, for the matters that vex us, the UCC is 99.9% irrelevant.  It is definitely and ubiquitously relevant in the gutting of the definition of "dollar" in the State-turned-STATE marketplaces. But, that's "all" that the UCC does. It allows everyone participating in the State-turned-STATE marketplaces to use "funny money" as the optional "choice of law" to the original honest weights and measures and Common Law system of commerce.


We have always had two levels of marketplaces: State (now STATE) and national.  The UCC guts the definition of "dollar" in the State marketplaces, which turns them into STATE marketplaces.  The UCC is STATE "law."  It's the State-turned-STATE counterpart to the gutting of "dollar" in the U.S. Code, which language shenanigans gutted the definition of "dollar" for purposes of the national marketplace.

The last thing that those trying to get loose from the "gotcha agreements" by which one finds oneself in a condition of "voluntary bondage" in "this state" wants to do is bring in the UCC.  To get lost in those rabbit trails is to be lost, generally.  The UCC is what "justifies" the use of "funny money" in the STATEs, and where the UCC is argued by the "target" (the "defendant" where the "plaintiff" is some version or other of "government"), it's difficult to avoid the judicial conclusion of "commercial nexus."  It's that very "commercial nexus" concept that those who are loose from "voluntary bondage" don't have.

At the end of the day, to get lost in the UCC is still to confess seeing this system as operating "by law" rather than "federally," as in "by agreement."  This is the most common problem among the "constitution-ists."  The "constitution-ists" still see a system that operated "by law," and, outside the penal code provisions, that's just not how this present "federal" system functions.  It's a wicked paradigm shift, to be sure, but the reality isn't altered by "coulda shoulda woulda." The "mistake of law" made by still thinking that there is a "constitution" is not a "mistake of law" that provides any defense.  We just have to know better, and it's not an enjoyable lesson; just a necessary one (for those who genuinely intend to understand, and then apply, the solutions we have, which solutions are not found in or of or about the UCC).

This present system depends upon our shishkabobbing ourselves, one person at a time, one "gotcha agreement" at a time, and those who get trapped in the UCC find themselves fully self-shishkabobbed and inside a maze out of which they have no path.

A far better concept to start with is this:  "federal" means "federal."

May The Lord cure sight for those who earnestly ask Him for such cure, and may those with that level of sight have the courage to apply what they learn from what they then see.

Harmon L. Taylor
Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas

Subscribe / unsubscribe :  legal_reality@earthlink.net

This is a fully copyrighted original work by Legal Reality under International Common Law copyright law.  No interest is asserted in "governmental" works cited, whether in or from "this state" or in or from any other commonwealth.  Permission is granted for electronic forwarding or copying, but only where what is forwarded or copied remains wholly in its original format (including font, font size, color, and content as formatted), warts and all.  No permission is granted for any modification in any way of this copyrighted original production.  This copyrighted original work, when forwarded or copied, must contain the whole of this International Common Law copyright statement.

The Matrix Is Real & Here – Here's The Biggest Threat To Human Freedom & Will Burn Down America: US Ignite

You need to see this - Colorado - HOA -The Truth About Why HB 14-1254 Was Gutted From a Legislator

This bill was introduced and written to protect homeowners in these groups!
Please read what is written below.  It is despicable that our lawmakers have apparently forgotten who they work for and who they are paid and empowered to protect.
  When the industry comes to steal, possibly take using any criminality they can think of, what these legislators and their families and friends own, I guess they will get it!
This appears to be everywhere and should have been stopped a very long time ago.  Too many innocent people and families are homeless due to no fault of their own, but the "influence," of a select few.

From: Colorado HOA Colorado <coloradohoaforum@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:23 PM
Subject: The Truth About Why HB 14-1254 Was Gutted From a Legislator
To: Colorado HOA Colorado <coloradohoaforum@gmail.com>

Finally, I got word directly and in writing from a legislator on how and why the Transfer Fee Bill was gutted by the CAI and how CAI misinformation was spread and digested as a solution. This exemplifies what most already suspected about our government process and why citizens don't get involved in their government.  It illustrates that principles and standing ground on what is right have no place in some folks standards of governance.  Here it is:

1.  The CAI told representatives that if the Bill included fee limits or restrictions on use of the fee they would kill the Bill and it better be changed.  So the CAI indicates it owns our representatives and they won't tolerate anyone going against their greedy principles.  Well it worked and it was that simple.  What happened to the thousands of emails and scores of telephone calls and personal visits by citizens on this issue? 
a
2.  Our legislative sponsors never considered sticking with the orginal intent of the Bill and letting it stand on its' own merits after being threatened by the CAI.  The sponsors had no faith in their fellow representatives to do the right thing and reform transfer fees and assumed all legislators can be bullied by the CAI. We'll never know if they were right.  Do any of these folks believe it is better to lose on principles and trying to do the right thing than to bend to money interests?

2.  Legislators were instructed to change the Bill so that oversight would involve property management companies  (PMCs) negotiating with HOA Boards to determine the proper amount and use of the transfer fee.  Let the bank robber be the bank guard or the fox look out for the well being of the chickens.  This outright discussion took place and seemed ok with our legislators.  It would be an insulting recommendation in the real world but in politics it made perfect sense.  These folks have no idea that HOAs are run by PMCs and that any fee proposed will be approved. 

3.  The CAI told legislators that a PMC will honestly brief Boards and home owners on the truth about why the fee is so high and required and be open to debate the amount.  This is not only a lie but ridiculous and insulting to think anyone would believe this but the CAI found a crowd at the Capitol who believes this crap (this is the proper word).  

4.  The CAI told legislators DORA will monitor unreasonable transfer fees and fine those abusing the fee.  A big lie.  DORA has no authority to do this and won't take on the issue.  This has nothing to do with licensing but legislators continue to drink the CAI tea and believe this. 

5.  The Bill of course will not address the illegal use of the fee by CAMs to supplement income and profits and allow for low bidding on contracts.  Why, the CAI told legislators this doesn't happen and would never happen so it was not addressed in the Bill. It was that simple.

So here you have it, the evolution and death of a well intended Transfer Fee Bill.  This whole Bill and CAI influence is toxic to our government process, filled with lies, and once again illustrates why our government is alienated from our citizens. Now take a deep breath but be assured if this piece of trash legislation passes this year we will be back next year to get reform. 







--
Stan Hrincevich                                                              
Colorado HOA Forum


You Subsidize Leftist Anarchy

from American Thinker...

February 19, 2014

You Subsidize Leftist Anarchy

You have been subsidizing the efforts of radical left-wing community organizers for years, and you probably didn't even know it.

Fifty years ago as Barack Hussein Obama inhaled the values of his communist parents, grandparents, and mentors, their comrades were drafting plans to destroy American civil society.

Armed with your parents' and grandparents' tax dollars, America-hating extremists Richard Cloward, Frances Fox Piven, and Saul Alinsky were hard at work in the 1960s laying the foundation to wreak havoc on America and its people in an effort to force revolutionary change.

Progressive agitators' quest to obliterate economic freedom was aided by the "War on Poverty," a metaphorical military undertaking against an ineradicable foe. Given its chance of success, it may as well have been the War on Rainbows.

This doomed adventure got underway while Americans were still woozy and shaken, in need of reassurance just seven weeks after an avowed communist named Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated President John F. Kennedy.


In his first State of the Union address on Jan. 8, 1964, President Lyndon Johnson ushered in a half-century of government-incentivized sloth, indolence, dependency, and social decay. He urged Congress to embark on a new belligerency against the condition of not having enough stuff, as arbitrarily determined by vote-grubbing politicians. "Let this session of Congress be known," Johnson proclaimed, "as the session which declared all-out war on human poverty and unemployment in these United States."

The Economic Opportunity Act (EOA) of 1964 became the centerpiece of the new war. It expanded the nation's social safety hammock, turning government resources into war materiel to be used against the American system of constitutionally limited government. Many of the EOA-created programs still exist today, including VISTA (Volunteers In Service To America), now known as AmeriCorps VISTA, Job Corps, and Head Start.

Many more excuses for handouts were created afterward -- so many, in fact, that it is difficult for poor people to pass through the minefield of government assistance unscathed. The federal government now administers 80 different means-tested, largely stigma-free welfare programs. Government blew $916 billion on these programs in 2012 alone, and about 100 million Americans accepted aid from at least one of the programs. Federal and state welfare spending, adjusted for inflation, is now 16 times greater than when this war was declared, according to Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation.

Neo-Marxist ideologue that he is, President Obama is determined to double down on leftist failure, widening the so-called war by calling for the biggest welfare spending increases in American history -- amounting to more than $10 trillion over a decade, according to Rector.

Calls for more welfare spending come after the country has saturation-bombed poor people with welfare over the past 50 years, to the tune of $20.7 trillion in 2011 dollars, far exceeding what the U.S. has spent on every actual, non-figurative war it has fought.

Yet "victory" is nowhere in sight. In 2012, 15 percent of Americans lived below the poverty line, roughly the same percentage as in the mid 1960s. Currently, around 50 million Americans live below the poverty line, which the government defines as a four-member family earning $23,550 annually. And 47 million Americans receive food stamp benefits, 13 million more than when President Obama was first sworn in.

But most Americans are blissfully unaware of the most sinister, subversive component of the Economic Opportunity Act. The War on Poverty gave taxpayers' money to "community" groups in order to encourage them to agitate against the status quo. In a sense, America declared war on itself, and funded leftist groups to do the fighting.

The public underwriting of revolutionary activism came out of the "maximum feasible participation" doctrine, under which more people were encouraged to receive government benefits such as welfare. Its adherents argued that the best way to fight poverty was to expand government subsidies to segments of the population.

Government-funded pressure groups would also involve the poor in taxpayer-funded organizing aimed at changing society by pushing it leftward. The idea had "revolutionary implications" because "it involved a redistribution of power," according to academic Lillian B. Rubin. "The idea of 'maximum feasible participation' has captured the imagination of the urban poor, with the force of an idea whose time has come; it will not die," Rubin wrote in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science in September 1969.

Awash in billions of dollars government money, America-hating small-c communists such as Alinsky, Piven, and Cloward went about building the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)'s parent organization, the National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO), along with a vast armada of tax-supported thug groups to destroy the American society they loathed.

The War on Poverty also gave taxpayers' money to so-called community groups like ACORN and Alinsky's Industrial Areas Foundation in order to encourage them to agitate against the status quo. Cloward and Piven declared triumphantly in their 1977 book Poor People's Movements that the larger spending programs that were ushered in during the War on Poverty spurred activism and created a new leadership structure in the inner cities. Some of the federal money went directly to local groups as political patronage.

"[G]hetto groups were encouraged by federal policymakers to use these funds to create organizations and to press their own interests, especially in the arena of municipal services and politics," they wrote. This, in turn, stimulated demand for more government spending as taxpayer dollars became a kind of ever-increasing subsidy for pro-big government activism. Tax-eating groups got tax dollars to press for higher taxes.

The federal government still hands out huge grants to left-wing groups to subsidize their efforts to take away our economic freedoms, yet today, amazingly enough, federal funding of leftist groups is barely even controversial.

Groups that are on the fringes of the left get big bucks from Uncle Sam.

For example, a quick search at USAspending.gov reveals that mountains of federal dollars have been obligated to the Latino community organizing outfit National Council of La Raza ($30 million).

Over the years, ACORN received more than $79 million in federal funding, as I reported in my book ACORN/Obama exposé, Subversion Inc.: How Obama's ACORN Red Shirts and Still Terrorizing and Ripping Off American Taxpayers. And innumerable lesser-known, small, local leftist groups have sunk their fangs into the public fisc.

Leftist groups routinely feed at the trough of HUD, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development -- which really ought to be named the U.S. Department of Homewrecking and Utopian Development for its social engineering schemes. HUD's fiscal 2014 budget is $32.8 billion. One of HUD's many fraud-prone programs is the $3-billion-a-year CDBG (Community Development Block Grants) program, a scheme from which Alinskyite groups and rent-seeking politicians are particularly adept at extracting funds.

And then there are the federal grants for the almost 50,000 ObamaCare "navigators," who the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says are supposed to "serve as an in-person resource for Americans who want additional assistance in shopping for and enrolling in plans" on the ObamaCare exchanges.

These grants aren't about educating the public. They are examples of graft, pure and simple. Left-wing activists have scooped up more than $67 million in grants nationwide to hire the navigators, a payoff to radical pressure groups that helped win Barack Obama the presidency.

The radicals figured out a long time ago how to have their cake and eat it, too. They advance their objectives, destroy civil society, and send you the bill.

Matthew Vadum (website) is an investigative journalist in Washington, D.C., and author of the ACORN/Obama exposé Subversion Inc. Follow him on Twitter.

Video: Former Clinton Aide Drops BOMBSHELL On Hillary, Bill

Video: Former Clinton Aide Drops BOMBSHELL On Hillary, Bill

February 18, 2014 by NewsEditor Comments (0)

Kathleen Willey, the former volunteer aide to Bill Clinton who says she was sexually harassed by the president in the 1990s, is now sounding the alarm about the potential danger of Hillary Clinton becoming president.


Medicare Part G

Subject: MEDICARE PART G]


 
If I sent this to you before, it means I've had a "Senior Moment".  It's still too good not to share............



Medicare Part G

st
You're a sick senior citizen and the government says there is no nursing
home care available for you. So what do you do?

Our plan gives anyone 65 years, or
older, a gun (G) and 4 bullets.
You are allowed to shoot four Politicians.

Of course, this means you'll be sent to prison, where you will receive three
meals a day, a roof over your head,
central heating and air conditioning and
all the health care you need.

Need new teeth? No problem. Need glasses? That's great. Need a new hip, knees, kidney, lungs or heart? They're all covered.

As an added bonus, your family can come and visit you at least as often as they do now.

And who will be paying for all of this?
The same government that just told you they can't afford for you to go into a
home.

And, you can get rid of 4 useless 
politicians while you're at it.

Plus, because you are a prisoner, you
don't have to pay any income taxes anymore.

Is this a great country or what?









BUY --- Made In The USA

Intel Tidbits

OPEN MARKET OPERATIONS instructions have been given...OMO initialized on the 16th…JUST WATCH IT DEVELOP...

VILLA-NOVA SAYS, Look at the way the banks are behaving now in Iraq!

Teams report: ALL STEPS ARE COMPLETED

KURDS ARE EXTREMELY HAPPY...HAPPIER THAN THEY EVER EVER BEEN...

(IQD WILL BE PEGGED TO U S D)

ALL WE ARE WAITING ON IS A FEW DEALS/CONTRACTS TO BE COMPLETED, FINALIZED, JUST CLERICAL (HCL)

WATCH CBI WATCH CBI WATCH CBI (not forex)

(pay noo attention to these reconstituted articles spewing bile)

WE ARE IN THE E N D STAGES

BUSY LIKE A BUNCH OF BUMBLE BEES! BUZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

LOOK FOR BLACKOUT OF INFORMATION...IT IS UPON US! (staring us right in the face)

MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR...MONETARY REFORM AT IT'S FINEST

G O I SIT DOWN BUCKLE UP AND SHUT UP

M EXIT STRATEGY IS IN PLACE!