Thursday, February 20, 2014

Battles Intensify in Fight for our Freedom!

Subject: Battles Intensify in Fight for our Freedom!


The deaths of Bankers is all over the internet. The Mainstream Media refuses to link all the deaths together IN ANY MEANINGFUL WAY...it scares them.
 
The battles for our Freedom are RAGING!
 
I have posted the latest Friday Road Trip for Private Road Members:
 
 
Topics this week include:
 
- Exposing the Banking Cabal
- Housing Collapse Begins Again
- Greenspan's Lost Thesis 
- Vatican Bank's Darkness Ending?
- Our World is Changing...You Must Change With It
- Come on Friends! The "Intrinsic Value" of Bitcoin Blows Away the intrinsic Value of Gold
 
*If you live in the SF Bay Area don't forget to come by Oakland Silver and Gold tonight to see Heidi Wastweet's Art Show, buy some physical silver and talk about ROOTA CONSPIRACIES with me!!
 
6-9pm
Address: 3929 Piedmont Ave, Oakland, CA 94611
 
May the Road you choose be the Right Road.
 
Bix Weir

OBAMA GAVE CHINA PERMISSION TO iNVADE THE UNITED STATES

The CFR (Council on Foreign Relations members of which have decided it is their right - no 'duty' - to determine your fate and mine and that of the entire planet) is located at 58 E. 68th Street in Manhattan 

OBAMA GAVE CHINA PERMISSION TO iNVADE THE UNITED STATES 

Chilling Fear: "Red Dawn" Coming Soon to America! OBAMA GAVE CHINA PERMISSION TO INVADE THE UNITED STATES FROM THE PACIFIC OCEAN WHEN THE DOLLAR DIES

U.S. economy on schedule to crash March 4, 2014

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/25/us-economy-on-schedule-to-crash-march-2014/?page=all

U.S. economy on schedule to crash March 4, 2014

America’s fall will take global economies with it


Those wild and crazy Mayans put down their marker that the end of the world would occur on Dec. 21, 2012 — about two months from now. There is, of course, some small chance that they might be right. On the other hand, there is a very large probability that the real end of the world will occur around March 4, 2014.

The doomsday clock will ring then because the U.S. economy may fully crash around that date which will, in turn, bring down all world economies and all hope of any recovery for the foreseeable future — certainly over the course of most of our lifetimes.

Interest rates will skyrocket, businesses will fail, unemployment will go to record levels, material and food shortages will be rampant, and there could be major social unrest.

Any wishful thinking that America is in a “recovery” and that “things are getting better” is an illusion.

The problem is not Medicare, which won’t quit on us for another six or seven years. Nor is it Social Security, which will not be fully bankrupt for another 15 years or so. The crisis is much more immediate and much more serious.

The central problem is that America is the bank of the world. What this means, simply, is that the dollar is the world’s currency (often termed the “reserve currency”).

Throughout the world nearly all traded goods, oil, major commodities, real estate, etc. are denominated in dollars. The world needs dollars, and the U.S. provides them and provides confidence that the dollar is the “safest” currency in the world. Countries get dollars by trading with us on attractive terms, which enables Americans to live very well. Countries support this system and cover their risk by investing in dollars through T-bill auctions and other mechanisms, which enables us to run budget deficits — up to a point.

The central issue is confidence in America, and the world is losing confidence quickly. At a certain point, soon, the United States will reach a level of deficit spending and debt at which the countries of the world will lose faith in America and begin to withdraw their investments. Many leading economists and bankers think another trillion dollars or so may do it.

A run on the banks will start suddenly, build quickly and snowball. At that point, we will need to finance our own deficit, and we will not be able to do so. We will raise bond rates to re-attract foreign investment, interest rates will go up, and businesses will fail. Unemployment will skyrocket.

The rest of the world will fully crash along with us. Europe will continue to decline, and the euro will not replace the dollar. Russia will see a collapse in oil prices as market demand softens, and Russia will collapse along with it.
China will find nowhere to export and also will collapse. The Russian and Chinese governments, which see all this coming and have been stockpiling gold to hedge against such a dollar collapse, will find that you cannot eat gold.

There will be uprisings — think of the streets in Spain and Greece today — everywhere. Technological advances that traditionally drive productivity increases and economic growth will not be able to keep up with this collapse.

When might this all happen? Paul Volker indicates we might face a mess like this in the next year and a half.

David Walker, former U.S. comptroller, i.e., the former chief accountant of the U.S. government, has suggested similar time frames for economic catastrophe. 

Most agree that the budget sequestration approach won’t work from either economic or political perspectives, and mindless across-the-board cuts in spending will only exacerbate a mess. The Federal Reserve’s third round of quantitative easing, in which they print money to buy their own bonds in order to goose economic and employment numbers, means they are floating their own debt, a good formula for sudden hyperinflation.

The next 'president' will have about six months to fix this problem before it is too late. He must be fully prepared, able and willing to work with Congress and move quickly and decisively.

During the 'election' (better pray there IS a REAL and HONEST one and NOT the continued  rigged 'elections' of the past 60 years, all fraudulent by the DC mob)the most important question to ask is, "Who understands all this and is prepared to prevent it?" Everything else is noise.

Grady Means is a businessman, former assistant to Vice President Nelson Rockefeller and former economist at the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.

Battle for Humanity Nearly Lost: Global Food Supply Deliberately Engineered to End Life, not Nourish It

To those who thought I was paranoid...THINK AGAIN....

THIS "IS"  WHAT HAS BEEN GOING ON.

The proof is walking all around you... 

EACH generation gets sicker with more and more diseases and ailments

GET REAL, PEOPLE, AND WAKE UP!!!

Battle for Humanity Nearly Lost: Global Food Supply Deliberately Engineered to End Life, not Nourish It



http://whatsupic.net/life-culture-mexico/1392922040.html

THIS IS WHY THERE HAS BEEN NO RV RELEASED FOR THE UNITED STATES - THIS SITUATION IS NOT BEING RELAYED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE - THEY WILL NOT BE PREPARED, WILL PANIC AND MARTIAL LAW AND ROUNDUPS BEGIN

THIS IS WHY THERE HAS BEEN NO RV RELEASED FOR THE UNITED STATES - THIS SITUATION IS NOT BEING RELAYED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE - THEY WILL NOT BE PREPARED, WILL PANIC AND MARTIAL LAW AND ROUNDUPS BEGIN

DHS Agent Reveals: U.S. To Collapse Within 6 Weeks! 

February 19, 2014 — (TRN) — An Agent from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security revealed to a local 21 year old that the United States will collapse into martial law within six (6) weeks.

Banks will be closed, credit / debit cards will not work.

Those without food or cash will starve to death or be killed when they try taking food from those who have it. 

This is the e-mail received from a Turner Radio Network Contributor

JPMorgan and Madoff Were Facilitating Nesting Dolls-Style Frauds Within Frauds (HOWARD HUGHES FINANCIAL "UMBRELLA" SAME THING! INVESTIGATED BY HOUSE OVERSIGHT!

This is what bankrupted AMB AMBRO the Bank of the Netherlands.  They used the "International Durham Overseas Ltd." sound alike for Durham (Intl. Ltd;) Holding Trust, Tias 12087..

================================================================================================================================

 

JPMorgan and Madoff Were Facilitating Nesting Dolls-Style Frauds Within Frauds

By Pam Martens: January 13, 2014


Last week JPMorgan Chase paid $2.6 billion in fines and restitution, signed a deferred prosecution agreement and walked away from their 22-year involvement with Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme. But according to court documents filed in 2011 by the Trustee of the Madoff victims’ fund, Irving Picard, this was not a simple case of poor risk management at JPMorgan. This was an operation structured like those Russian nesting dolls, with the Ponzi scheme as the outside doll with many more frauds layered inside the big one.
After reading the documents released by the Justice Department in connection with the settlement, the Los Angeles Times asked in a photo caption of a smirking Madoff outside of Federal Court: “Bernie Madoff: Was he part of the JPMorgan ring, or was JPMorgan part of his ring?”
The New York Times had a far more charitable stance, with Floyd Norris writing: “Did JPMorgan Chase deliberately cover up Bernard L. Madoff’s fraud? The documents released this week by federal prosecutors do not show it did, and I suspect it did not.”
Interestingly, the folks in sunny California, 2400 miles away from Wall Street, had an epiphanous moment in that photo caption while the Times assumed an all too common ostrich position when it comes to Wall Street.
According to the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC), the Justice Department prosecutors who settled the case against JPMorgan Chase used the investigative material from Picard to bring their charges and settle the case. Those court filings show layers upon layers of frauds within the Ponzi scheme.
For starters, JPMorgan Chase used unaudited financial statements and skipped the required steps of bank due diligence to make $145 million in loans to Madoff’s business, according to Picard. Lawyers for the Trustee write that from November 2005 through January 18, 2006, JPMorgan Chase loaned $145 million to Madoff’s business at a time when the bank was on “notice of fraudulent activity” in Madoff’s business account and when, in fact, Madoff’s business was insolvent. The reason for the JPMorgan Chase loans was because Madoff’s business account, referred to as the 703 account, was “reaching dangerously low levels of liquidity, and the Ponzi scheme was at risk of collapsing.” JPMorgan, in fact, “provided liquidity to continue the Ponzi scheme,” according to Picard.
Clearly, this is fraud number two on the part of someone – loan fraud.
Fraud number three occurred when JPMorgan Chase and its predecessor banks extended tens of millions of dollars in loans to Norman F. Levy and his family so they could invest with the insolvent Madoff. (Levy died in 2005 at age 93 without being charged with any crimes. Levy’s accountant, Paul J. Konigsberg, was indicted in September of last year and charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission in a civil action. Konigsberg has pleaded not guilty in both cases.)
According to Picard, Levy had $188 million in outstanding loans in 1996, which he used to funnel money into Madoff investments. Picard’s lawyers told the court that JPMorgan Chase (JPMC) “referred to these investments as ‘special deals.’ Indeed, these deals were special for all involved: (a) Levy enjoyed Madoff’s inflated return rates of up to 40% on the money he invested with Madoff; (b) Madoff enjoyed the benefits of large amounts of cash to perpetuate his fraud without being subject to JPMC’s due diligence processes; and (c) JPMC earned fees on the loan amounts and watched the ‘special deals’ from afar, escaping responsibility for any due diligence on Madoff’s operation.”
A critical piece of evidence against JPMorgan was that despite funneling loans to both Madoff and Levy, the bank “advised the rest of its Private Bank customers not to invest with Madoff,” according to Picard.
On paper, according to Picard, Levy was worth $1.5 billion in 1998. He was such an important customer to JPMorgan and its predecessor firms that he was given his own office at the bank – a situation that perhaps fueled the Los Angeles Times’ question of just who was a part of whose gang.
Levy was a commercial real estate broker and, according to an article by Mark Seal in the April 2009 issue of Vanity Fair, at one point Levy “had an ownership stake in 70 properties, including the Seagram Building and 21 shopping centers across America…” There is some basis for suspicion that inflated and fraudulent account statements provided by either JPMorgan Chase and/or Madoff may have been used to obtain real estate loans. If so, that would constitute yet another fraud.
According to Picard, Levy’s relationship with JPMorgan’s predecessor banks predated his relationship with Madoff by 31 years. Once Levy was a Madoff client, the relationship included classic, unchecked evidence of money laundering for years and years that should have resulted in legally-mandated Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) filed with the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). Even after another bank detected the activity in the late 90s and reported the transactions to FinCEN, JPMorgan Chase and its predecessor banks failed to file their own mandated SARs and not only allowed the activity to continue but allowed it to increase dramatically in dollar terms.
Having worked on Wall Street myself for 21 years, I can assure you that just one atypical transfer of a large sum of money between accounts will elicit a serious investigation by an honest  Wall Street firm’s compliance department. It will drill down until it gets proof that the transfer had a legitimate basis.
What was happening in Madoff’s account was so over the top that it is virtually impossible to reconcile it with a legitimate compliance department unless some higher up simply shut down the normal bank controls. Picard told the court that “during 2002, Madoff initiated outgoing transactions to Levy in the precise amount of $986,301 hundreds of times — 318 separate times, to be exact. These highly unusual transactions often occurred multiple times on a single day.”
Levy’s accountant, Konigsberg, is charged with routinely telling a Madoff employee to regenerate statements for the clients referred to him by Madoff, dictating the terms of what kind of profits and losses he wanted to see on the statements each year.
The SEC says in its complaint that Konigsberg “was compensated for his work in connection with these BMIS [Bernard Madoff Investment Securities] clients. He received fees directly for the accounting services that he provided to these clients, and additionally, BMIS and Bernard Madoff (Madoff) compensated Konigsberg with a monthly fee of $15,000 or $20,000 as a ‘retainer’ for providing accounting services to a wealthy and longtime Madoff client and his adult children.”  The SEC cites one example where “Konigsberg instructed Employee X that his client was to experience no more than $18 million in losses. In giving these instructions, Konigsberg understood that Employee X and BMIS would create unlawful, backdated trades to benefit his clients.”
And here we have, at least, frauds number four and five. Tax fraud and the fraudulent creation of broker-dealer records. And we’ve barely scratched the surface thus far.
Like we said, think Matryoshka, the Russian Nesting Dolls’ frauds within frauds.

Bookmark the permalink.

  • © 2014 Wall Street On Parade. Wall Street On Parade ® is registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  • WallStreetOnParade.com is a public interest web site operated by Russ and Pam Martens to help the investing public better understand systemic corruption on Wall Street. Ms. Martens is a former Wall Street veteran with a background in journalism. Mr. Martens' career spanned four decades in printing and publishing management.

The New Exchange Rate System By JC Collins

The New Exchange Rate System  By JC Collins

02/20/2014

 
Picture
The New Exchange Rate System 
February 19, 2014   JC Collins     

M1 Money Supply and Inflation 
By JC Collins


Purchasing Power Parity and Arbitrage are two terms that everyone should make themselves aware off as the world’s economy moves closer toward a centralized SDR trade system through the International Monetary Fund with accounts balanced by the Bank for International Settlements.

Purchasing Power Parity is the balance between exchange rates when there is also balance in the domestic purchasing power of the currencies.
...
Read More Link On Right

Arbitrage is taking advantage of the price imbalances between markets and profiting from the market differentials.

Arbitrage cannot exist alongside Purchasing Power Parity.

M1 money supply refers to physical currency as well as checking account deposits.

For your reference, M2 money is M1 money plus savings accounts and money market accounts.

And M3 money is M2 money plus large deposits and other long term large deposits, such as larger liquid assets as well as short term repurchase agreements.

Keep these terms in mind as we further define the structure and mechanisms of the emerging multilateral system.

As an extension to the SDR’s and the New Bretton Woods series, let us discuss a much talked about and confusing aspect of the system.  When the currencies of the world are released from their peg to the dollar and pegged to the SDR supra-sovereign currency which we have been reviewing, there will in fact be a new exchange rate structure.

What this structure will be has not yet been made available to the general population.  All the talk of specific exchange rates and timing of release of the rates are not founded in facts or accurate information.

And on the flip side of that there are those who are stating that a Global Currency Reset is a conspiracy theory.  To these people those that proclaim such a future “event” apparently do not understand the micro and macro of economic fundamentals or how exchange rates and money supply truly work.

Their argument appears very logical on the surface.  As a country increases its money supply through debt creation and currency printing, the value of that currency decreases.  More money in circulation means more devaluation of that currency, basic supply and demand principles.  So how can a currency revalue upward when there is so much of it in circulation?  Makes sense right?  Wrong.

If the key performance indicators (KPI) of any countries M1 money supply were that elementary, then we would live in a much simpler world.  We can make many examples of why this isn’t the case but none is more obvious than that of the U.S. dollar itself.

If more money in circulation meant a decrease in the value of that currency on the exchange rate market, then the dollar would be almost worthless today, much like the dong and other currencies.

 More U.S. debt (money creation) has been added in the last 6 years than the entire history of the U.S. itself, from George Washington to George W. Bush.  Yet the dollar’s exchange rate has maintained itself within a small range of fluctuation. 

The reason that the dollar has maintained this exchange rate over the years tells us that there are other KPI’s which need to be factored into the equation when measuring a countries exchange rate and inflation level, outside of direct manipulation of course.

Some of these indirect KPI’s are imports and exports.   And there is no direct relationship between M1 money supply increases and inflation.
Picture
Since 1944 the U.S. dollar has been the reserve currency which means that international trade imbalances have been settled in dollars. 


This forced other countries of the world to hold dollars which allowed the U.S. to export the majority of its inflation.



As the U.S. printed more money, expanding its M1 money supply, the inflation which should have settled domestically was in fact exported to the very same markets that were forced to hold a reserve of U.S. dollars in order to balance their trade accounts.

As we reviewed in “Why the Vietnamese Dong Will Reset”, the State Bank of Vietnam was indirectly forced into devaluing their currency in order to attract trade and also be a dumping ground for U.S. inflation as the Vietnamese people used the dollar instead of the dong in their everyday lives.

As the new centralized system of SDR allocation emerges between now and 2018 we will see less U.S. dollars in the foreign reserves of other countries.  As an example, in the last 5 years Vietnam has decreased their dollar holdings by almost 50% and at the same time have increased their gold holdings dramatically.  Interestingly enough, their SDR holdings also increased by a factor of more than 400%.

The question of what Vietnam will do with the trillions of dong that are now in circulation is a legitimate question.  When the exchange rate of the dong adjusts to reflect the economic reality within the country, these trillions of dong cannot be in circulation, as it would create an M1 money supply that is disproportionate to the actual economic weights used for the SDR composition.

Therein lays the solution to the problem.

Keeping with our pattern theme of transitions from micro to macro states, we start with the process of the dollar, the world’s reserve currency, being printed and exported to the central banks of the world to facilitate trade.  The inflation and exchange rate decreases that would be logically associated with this increase in the M1 money supply is hidden or sunk into the markets of the emerging economies.

As the world shifts towards the SDR system we will see a similar process unfold.  In essence, Vietnam will export their inflation (current M1 money supply) into the SDR bond system just like the United States has been exporting its inflation into emerging markets and countries like Vietnam through trade imbalances.

 What we will see is Vietnam slowly begin to buy back the dong in circulation and re-capitalize it through the SDR bonds.

Once a predetermined level has been achieved the rest of the dong M1 money supply will remain in circulation and be pegged to the multilateral SDR and not the U.S. dollar.  In fact we are beginning to see this process unfold already in the numbers we presented above.  This slow trickle will eventually become a stampede out of dollars and into SDR’s.  It will be the same for every country.

The U.S. debt will also be rolled into SDR’s and factor into the overall economic weight of that country’s SDR composition.  This is where the substitution account we referenced in Part 6 of the SDR series becomes invaluable. 

This substitution account will act as a transition market for dollars to SDR’s to ensure that current holders of U.S. debt do not see that asset value decrease dramatically as the system shifts.  China will utilize this substitution account just as much as the United States Treasury and Federal Reserve.

China will not be dumping dollars.  They will transition the dollar debt which they hold into SDR’s through this substitution account.  The one aspect that is holding the process up right now in the American Congress (2010 Code of Reforms) is how this dollar to SDR transition will factor into China’s overall SDR composition for the renminbi.

This is one of the hardest aspects of this new system to understand, which is why it is still being negotiated.  It would do us well to spend more time in the future exploring the different angles involved in the Great Consolidation aspect of the Global Currency Reset.  One cannot exist without the other.  It has been intentionally designed this way.

Most don’t know this, but the Syrian pound is already pegged to the SDR, and has been for about 5 years.  One can only speculate if this has something to do with the civil war in the country.

What some analysts don’t factor into their equations is how much the economic system of the world will change, and is changing, as we move towards the multilateral monetary system with all the currencies of the world pegged to the SDR.

 For those who doubt the reality of this new system, the volume of information that has been available and is coming available would seem to prove its existence.

The new system will create Purchasing Power Parity and at the same time eliminate Arbitrage.  Arbitrage is one of the economic weapons that the small rent seeking elite use to transfer wealth from the larger disorganized masses.  The M1 money supply will most likely also be redesigned to more accurately measure the weights of the new SDR system.     – JC Collins

http://philosophyofmetrics.com/2014/02/19/the-new-exchange-rate-system/


POSTERS COMMENT... SOON THIS TO WILL BE GONE AS THE GANGSTER BANKERS HAVE BEEN BEHIND THIS MESS TOO... MR. COLLINS IS APART OF THE OLD BANKING SYSTEM... ALL OF THE NEW STUFF STILL HAS  ROTHSCHILD BEHIND IT, AND WILL NOT BE HONEST UNTIL ROTHSCHILD AND ALL THE OTHER CROOKS ARE G O N E!! 

History Lesson on Your Social Security Card

And I hear college educated people make comments about how the people in Washington
are able to manage things "so much better" than we can!  Huh?? With the post office in the
red, social security in the red, ALL of Washington in the red, how can that be???
Wake up, America!


                      
History Lesson on Your Social Security Card

Dick Kantenberger
Gifted Education Writer
Examiner.com
History Lesson on Your Social Security Card
Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (and some older ones) didn't know this.
It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it. Be sure and show it to your family
and friends. They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter
whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts.

Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and
Card were not to be used for identification purposes.
 Since nearly everyone in the
United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the
message, NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION was removed.










An old Social Security card with the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message.
Our Social Security

Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social
Security (FICA) Program. He promised:

1) That participation in the Program would be
completely voluntary,


No longer Voluntary


2) That the participants would only have to pay
1% of the first $1,400 of their annual
incomes into the Program
,


Now 7.65%

On the first $
117,000.

3) That the money the participants elected to put
into the Program would be deductible from
their income for tax purposes each year,


No longer tax deductible


4) That the money the participants put in went to the
Independent 'Trust Fund'
rather than into the
General Operating Fund, and therefore, would
only be used to fund the Social Security
Retirement Program, and no other
Government program, and,
 

Under Johnson the money was moved to
 
The General Fund and spent.


5) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never
be taxed as income.

Under Clinton & Gore
 
up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed.


Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are
now receiving a Social Security check every month --
and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of
the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put
away -- you may be interested in the following:

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the
Independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the
General Fund so that Congress could spend it?

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and theDemocratically
controlled House and Senate.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax
deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?

A: The Democratic Party.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social
Security annuities?


A: The Democratic Party with Al Gore casting the
'tie-breaking' deciding vote
as President of the
Senate, while he was Vice President of the U.S.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

Q: Which Political Party decided to start
giving annuity payments to immigrants? 

(AND MY FAVORITE):

A: That's right!


Jimmy Carter
 and the Democratic Party.
Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65,
began to receive Social Security payments! The
Democratic Party gave these payments to them,
even though they never paid a dime into it!

------------ -- ------------ --------- ----- ------------ --------- ---------

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA),
The Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans
want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!
 
If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of
awareness will be planted and maybe changes will
evolve.
 

But it's worth a try.  How many people can YOU send this to?

Actions speak louder than bumper stickers.



Today's Bank Story

My bank story... well, my Mom's from 2-20-14
Bank story form my Mother ~noon PST:

A friend of my Mom's who my Mom got into our party went to her SoCal WF on totally non-RV related business this morning and happened to overhear a couple of bank employees openly discussing "all of the coming changes." They noticed her watching and listening to their conversation and, when they acknowledged her, she casually mentioned "You folks sure are selling a lot of dong!" They replied, "we sure are! Do you know about it?"

When she said she did the branch manager introduced himself and asked her if she also had dinar! She said yes, she did and he asked her how much she has. When she told him he replied "well, you're going to get a truly amazing return on that investment! And you do know that it's imminent right?"

Folks, I've gotta say, I'm actually allowing myself to get VERY excited now!

Father Guido Sarducci explains the meaning of life

Hi Guys,
I received this today from a friend and figured you could all use a good laugh
I saw this over a year ago but still laughed so much when I saw it again
Have fun!

Father Guido Sarducci explains the meaning of life.


http://www.youtube.com/embed/0AKvRvL5r3A?rel=0