.
INDICTMENT OF HRM Elizabeth II AND HER ROYAL FAMILY FOR A CHARGE OF TREASON and MY CLAIM TO UK THRONE
.
.
ROYAL DUTIES AS A CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH
.
CORONATION OATH, HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH II JUNE 2, 1953
.
CONTENTS June 2, 1953, Coronation Vows:
“REIGN” VS. “RULE” Defaults in ROYAL COVENANT OBLIGATIONS as if
nonexistent. Adding Efforts to Confuse the Public, a political strategy
for world dominance Looking Away, “NOT-SEE”ing E.U.-HEGEMONY as
Predation on Peoples.
.
* Pedophilia, Human-trafficking & Serial Wars, ALL in fact “just busness,” no one accountable for harm.
.
* Debt & Class Bankruptcies, Bank Usury and investment fraud are running rampant, uncorrected.
.
* Wars for profits & prophets occur for PC-population reduction en masse, genocide & omnicide at work.
.
* Radiological
Contamination. The Crown is a primary purveyor, processor &
marketing agency for reactive and depleted uranium used in fission
reactors and armaments in the world. LAWS of Marriage and Bloodline.
Tavistock Institute’s Goal to OVERRULE Morality & Civil Ethics.
UNESCO’s Common Core Sex Ed Curricula Parties of the First Part, in the
Royal Succession. Looking to a Future to Live In.
.
June 2, 1953, Queen’s Coronation Vows: “REIGN” VS. “RULE”
Transcript of the original Coronation video, herein is the dialogue
between the Queen and officials of the Church of England at Her
Majesty’s Coronation. . . . “dedicating herself before God, to the service of her subjects.” — “Madam, is Your Majesty willing to take the Oath?” [HRM states]: “I am willing.” — “Will
you solemnly promise and swear to govern the peoples of the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and northern Ireland–Canada, Australia, New
Zealand, . . . according to their respective laws and customs?” [HRM states]: “I solemnly promise so to do.” — “Will you to your power, cause Law and Justice in mercy to be executed in all your judgments?” [HRM states]: “I will.” — “Will
you, to the utmost of your power, maintain the Laws of God and the true
profession of the gospel? “Will you to the utmost of your power,
maintain in the United Kingdom, the Protestant Reformed religion
established by law? “Will you maintain and preserve invoilable, the
settlement of the Church of England–and the doctrine, worship,
discipline and government thereof, as by Law established in England? And
will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and of the
churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges
as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them?” [HRM states]: “All this I promise to do.” . . . “The things which I have herebefore promised, I will perform and keep, so help me God.”
.
TREASON : NOT PAYING ATTENTION TO CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
.
IS THIS CLEAR ENOUGH? In
a Constitutional Monarchy, it is Members of Parliament who Rule by Law
(legislation of Law and Statute Codes) while the Sovereign reigns. The
Monarch serves a function similar to checks-and-balances in the United
States Constitution. So Parliament is charged with crafting statutes,
once the foundational Laws for the country are in place. It is fitting
under such a Constitutional Monarchy for the King or Queen to operate by
powers listed below.
.
Executive Power of the Queen or King of Britain: The
power to choose and dismiss a prime minister. The power to dismiss
ministers and the government, dissolve parliament and call for new
elections. The power to enact laws and/or veto legislation passed by
Parliament. The power to issue proclamations with Parliament’s consent.
The power to “exercise Crown prerogatives,” including declaration of war
and emergency. The right to read confidential government documents and
intell reports, to advise and to warn. The power to elevate or exile
individuals; pardon convicted felons, grant and bestow titles and
honors, where she herself is immune from accusations of conflict of
interest. This is a debatable issue due to the fact the Royal Family
retinue reflect back on the Monarch’s character; and there have been
many unscrupulous, perfidious, deceitful Monarchs in our history to
date.
.
ROYAL DUTIES AS A HOSPITALITY-P.R. EXECUTIVE: As articulated in Annual Financial Reports
of Buckingham Palace, there is no correspondence or similarity between
“Her Majesty’s Powers” and the actual carrying out of functions she
routinely performs. The Queen serves as corporatist mascot of State and only includes ceremonial
aspects of leadership–no judgments or problem-solving or
decision-making is included, as recorded in the following activities in
the 2011 Annual Report: Undertaking constitutional duties, for example
the State Opening of Parliament, regular audiences with the Prime
Minister, meetings of the Privy Council, giving Royal Assent to
legislation and approving many appointments; Fulfilling constitutional
responsibilities in relation to the Scottish Parliament and, where
appropriate, the Welsh and Northern Ireland Assemblies; Carrying out
State and Royal Visits overseas and receiving State and Official
visitors to the United Kingdom; Receiving credentials from foreign Heads
of Mission; and presenting honours at Investitures. In addition, the
role of The Queen, supported by members of the Royal Family, extends
more widely than these formal duties and includes: Providing a focus for
national identity, unity and pride (for example on Remembrance Sunday
and at times of national celebration or tragedy); Providing a sense of
stability and continuity (for example by participating in traditional
ceremonies such as Trooping the Colour); Recognising success,
achievement and excellence (for example through visits, receptions and
awards); and Contributing through public service and the voluntary
sector to the life of the nation; In this area The Queen is particularly
supported by the work of other members of the Royal Family (e.g. The
Prince’s Trust and The Duke of Edinburgh’s Award Scheme). CITATION: 2011 Annual Financial Report of Buckingham Palace.
.
Conflicting Obligations Renders the Monarch a puppet by choice
.
II DEFAULT IN ROYAL “COVENANT” OBLIGATIONS as if nonexistent.
Today the Monarch serves as a consumer and not as “Mediator” in
conflicts of interest and disputes between Common and Statute Laws. She
presides in name only, distancing herself from making
checks-and-balances that moral leadership demands, that the word “REIGN”
implies. She doesn’t even speak up about or speak TO conditions of
slavery, war and want. But she’s the head of the Church, so that its
Bishops don’t speak up either; Bishops of the Church of England are also
silenced, especially with Tavistock across the street from the
Archbishop of Canterbury’s office. Whereas she vowed to protect and
support the Church of England, She sits quietly and allows Tavistock,
which her Grandfather King George V (along with Kaiser Wilhelm) helped
establish, to degrade, discount, demean and dishonor Britain’s COVENANT
epitomized by the Stone of Scone under St. Edward the Confessor’s
Chair; but also British culture and Law, in direct violation of her
Coronation Vows. Queen Elizabeth signed SIX Lisbon Treaties that gave
away her sovereign prerogatives–practically behind closed doors and
without the consent of the British peoples–to EU management by distant,
impersonal entities, unelected and unrepresentative of Britain. She has
reduced herself to the status of CEO of the United Kingdom Corporation.
.
Technically, there is nothing “Royal”
about Royals who join the EU, because the EU rules, but no Monarch has
the authority to combat conflicts of interest caused by EU legislation.
And so, the Royal Monarchs all sit together as peers who all still
pretend to be sovereigns having dominion even over themselves, while
they are all yet subject to EU top-down legislation. Britain’s Queen
serves as hostess and greeter, or she may send in a look-alike
[doppelganger] lady-in-waiting. Effectively, she is in the Hospitality
Business, she entertains for the State and she reads “My Government’s
Goals” without challenge or question. CITY OF LONDON; INNS OF COURT; THE
BAR.–She stands silent and servile before the Inns of Court that run
dual and twisted legalist systems combining common law and Maritime
statutes without regard to effects on working classes.
Her Majesty’s relationship to the
Vatican, despite cautions embedded in the 1689 Bill of Rights that imbue
a “separate but equal” status upon Her Majesty and the Pope, ignores
the reality of infiltrating practices of Jesuit and Occult chivalric
Orders into UK society; namely, Order of the Garter, of the Thistle, of
the Bath and of St. John the Divine; Knights of Malta, and the Committee
of 300, among others. Even if the present Pope is an honorable man, the
next one could be another problem-identity because Papism falls into
factions—Christian, Satanic and Luciferian. And everybody knows :
Religion is a problem requiring clarity, facilitation skills and wisdom
coming from Leadership for Peace to obtain.
.
Immigration.
– Her Majesty and the entire Royal family distance themselves from
effects of Treaties she has signed that abrogate and annul sovereign
human rights and economic parity of British citizenry in favor of an EU
invasion of foreign minorities that literally threaten to take over the
UK, namely, the same Quranic imams and scholars that historically by
dogma and doctrine have always sought to conquer Western society. And
again, due to confusion over the trafficking of “persons” between UN,
EU, Quranic, Talmudic limits [against women, children and dissidents]
and [faith and thinking] boundaries–which Her Majesty left in place and
never speaks to–her children are found to be in just one scandal after
another for vicarious profits. Mainstream media endlessly discuss and
gossip about prurient escapades. The fact is, Prince Andrew is single,
he can “date” whoever he wants post-puberty, and “hell hath no fury like
a woman scorned;” so even when no crime has technically been committed,
there is staged uproar in the media.
.
Added Effort to Confuse: the Political Strategy of Dominance INTRODUCING DYSINFO AND MISINFO IN THE KINGDOM OF DAVID-ISRAEL-BRITAIN
.
Lie Number One is
that the United Kingdom has only been in existence since 1603, that it
has no basis in religion at all, nor does the Anglican Communion have
coherent history, back to Scotland, back to Irish Kings before the Roman
invasion. This is not true, but the history is hidden.
.
Lie Number Two is
that Roman-Maritime-Laws of the Sea and Laws of the Admiralty including
the UCCode are just as legal and reasonable in utility for humane
relations In Trust situations as they are for people in relations where
there is no Trust at work in relationship. This is false. Common Laws
are for people who know each other.
.
Lie Number Three is
that it’s reasonable to set the two sets of Law against each other in
the Bar Associations, without ever having articulated them as discrete
sets or pay any attention to the Chaos that is created in relationships
by Maritime Law.
Lie Number Four is
that citizens of a nation can be treated as cattle who are not privvy
to two distinct sets of Law and their contents as to who has dominion or
sovereign status.
Lie Number Five is
that Law ought to be so voluminous and complicated a nation best not
try to teach its stipulations to citizens directly; but rather require a
profession of legal experts who profiteer on legal predicaments they
can create by virtue of their special knowledge. This is outrageous upon
the working people.
.
Lie Number Six is
the “Bar Association” [Inns of Court] definition of a “person” engaging
one of the “experts” is “imbecile,” even though barristers and lawyers
themselves cannot command all sets of legalisms. The costs of Maritime
Courts are too burdensome to bear.
.
Lie Number Seven is
that a nation can live by Liberty and Dominion, that sets a profession
of Barristers, Lawyers and Legislators against its own peoples.
.
Lie Number Eight is
that a “reigning” Monarch has no responsibility to notice any of this
treachery, who presumes no responsibility for serving as
check-and-balance to restore the boundaries between Law of the Land [Trust and in occupancy] versus Law of the Sea.
IN FACTS—
Common Law Justice was established among the bloodlines of Israel Kings
by Moses over Mount Horeb after the Exodus from Egyptian slavery, and
the Kingdom’s operations guaranteed that the outcomes of Law would be
win/win or pay/win in disputes and conflicts for and among the peoples
themselves; Elitism was not permitted and the King had to abide by the
same Laws as everyone else. Common Law, one version of Laws of the Land,
have always had the purpose of protecting and restoring balance and
justice of citizens and travelers who reside and live and work on the
land in relationship in a nation and culture of people, in mutuality. (Eg, the Irish Brehon
system is another legal system In Trust.) Common Law is based on truth
telling among people who already know each other. But what about the
Covenant for the Kingdom in Britain? How did this Royal Family come
about it? Did they keep it, lose it, or throw it away? “Covenant” is not
even mentioned in the entire Buckingham Palace web-site. What is the
truth about the Lia Fail, the Stone of Destiny, the Coronation Stone? It
is here: [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLtqd_ERtCU ].
.
Written history going back 2600+ years
has been with us all along. In the Jewish Diaspora, the tribal line of
Judah set up residence in Ireland. Britain’s Monarchy goes back to Tara
Ireland beginning in 583BC, to settlements where Tribes of Dan and Judah
saw the arrival of the Prophet Jeremiah after Jerusalem’s sacking, with
King Zephaniah’s two daughters, Teah Tephi and Sophia, among Celts and
Gaels. Holy-Law-abiding culture according to Holy Law and Brehon Law
continued until St. Patrick converted Ireland to Christianity, and the
Royal bloodline moved to Iona Scotland, where and when King Fergus moved
the Monarchy and its Lia Fail, about 500AD. And then, when Edward I
conquered Scotland he moved the Lia Fail from Scotland to London in
1296AD. I mean, if the Crown is Monarchy over the entire British Isles,
then this is its true history–not the current version which places the
beginning of the Monarchy in 1603AD.
.
[See Hardinge, Leslie, The Celtic Church in Britain, New York, Teach Services Inc., 2005; Davidy, Yair, THE TRIBES, the Israelite Origins of Western Peoples, 2009(?), Hebron, Israel: Russell-Davis Publishers; Hisslop, Bishop Alexander, The Two Babylons, Proof that Roman Catholic Beliefs Came from Pagan Babylonian Religion, Ontario, CA: Chick Publications; Windsor-Cragg, E. Emily, Come Let Us Make Man In Our Image, Charleston, SC: Amazon.com Publishers, 2014; Windsor-Cragg, Emily E., Restoring the Kingdom of God to Sovereignty, San Bernardino CA: Amazon.com, Aug 2014.]
.
Six hundred years after the Kingdom of David came to Britain, Jesus Christ established the more Subtle Ethics of the Irish Brehon system of Law–in Judea–when he edited His Father’s Holy Mosaic Law to include personal applications and intentions–much as the Irish Brehon
System of Law was a personal legal ‘relationships’ system characterized
by mutual trust and reliability. Moreover, with the Sacrifice of that
innocent dissident Yeshua ben Joseph in 33CE,
the point was made that executing the innocent has no reason and no
purpose in creating Good and Just outcomes for people. So Jesus in His
Teachings omitted capital punishment, just as in Irish Brehon Law there was no capital punishment provision where human relations are in civil conflict. See Appendix 2, The Beatitudes and Teachings of Yeshua ben Joseph, no
cruelty at all. Jesus had taught, “Give therefore what is Caesar’s to
Caesar; but what is God’s to God,” THE OPERATING PRINCIPLE of the
Christ–NOT subjection as a vassal-chattel to a ROMAN-STYLED Corporate
STATE by impersonal rules, policies, procedures and mechanistic
practices as in Maritime Law, which is impersonal and in which there is
no mutual expectation of trust. B-U-T– How did impersonal Maritime Law (favoring Elites) overtake Common Laws OF THE LAND in the British Isles? Here
is a Legalist thumbnail history: HOW Maritime Law WON OVER Common Law
in Britain In the 16th and 17th century a handful of simultaneous
elements changed Law from the customary application of Common Laws of
the Land for the peoples of the Land, to Laws of the Sea, of Commerce,
of corporate statutes. In the 16th century the Spanish Armada dominated
the globe with conquest, and tt the time, Spain was the protector of
Rome and Vatican, Spain and Italy serving as single military-political
unit. One of the Popes in a Papal Bull (I believe it was “Innocent”)
declared the Vatican owned every soul on earth. Nobody countered that
claim (by Annunaki Law). Henry VIII adopted the Protestant Faith to get
free of that statement, and he formed the church of England to be able
to say, “No, they don’t own us.” Then with the founding of MI5-intell by
John Dee with collaboration of the Jesus Society of Jesuits, King James
II-VI ordered the British Navy to conquer Spain at sea in battle with
the Spanish Armada and destroy Spain’s dominance, which he accomplished.
Since that occurred at sea under Laws of the Sea, High Maritime Laws
obtained, and thereafter, Maritime Laws become dominant over England as
well, but Spain lost all claims and rights that they had won, under Laws
of the Sea. England could now say, “We’ve now taken away the ownership
of humanity from the Vatican, and we are now ruling the world because we
are in command of the Vatican by monetary dictates and commerce Law.”
Queen Victoria continued in the tradition of exercising sovereign rights
of her nation, but forever-after, under a pretext that Common Laws were
still sovereign over the Land, which was no longer the case. Today like
the US, the United Kingdom is not a common-laws-of-the-land Covenant
Nation; it’s a “Dinseyworld” of British Commerce and Statute Codes, and
Her Majesty is merely its CEO. She threw out her Crown when she signed
SIX Lisbon Treaties. These facts need to be known. Queen Elizabeth II is
not a reigning Monarch. She is a corporate mascot of the United Kingdom
Corporation. [Personal communication from historian Brian Zadonne.]
.
IV MONARCHY vs. EUROPEAN UNION HEGEMONY
Tyranny of Predatory Leadership arising out of Confusion between
Maritime Statutes and Common Laws British Monarchs have been silently
presiding with assent to the presence of FOUR stupendous black-hole
quagmires, never speaking to their causes, effects, outcomes or reasons.
.
FOUR CASES OF MALFEASANCE & OBFUSCATION OF THE MONARCH PEDOPHILIA AND “PERSON”-TRAFFICKING—“Just
bidness” in Maritime Law, Quranic & Talmudic Dogma, Doctrine and
Rules–especially in UN-UNESCO Education Policy. See Appendix 3. Elite
control over politics and legislation is guaranteed by the blackmail of
MPs for “procuring” porn and witnessing or
participating in child-abuse and slavery; but in Maritime Law there are
no penalties for subjective harm arising from “procuring a person as a
service,” except cash money, because Maritime Law is based on
indifferent and impersonal social norms, i.e, UN guidelines. And so,
scandals arise and fall, but prosecutions for child-trafficking, snuff
porn, slavery and murder for body parts are few and far between. At the
same time, prosecutions for truly victim-free crimes (like “smoking
weed,” selling raw milk, growing a garden in a “wrong” place or
installing rain-catch barrels) create harmless felons for
prison-industries that profit judges and stockholders of prisons and
social services. “Revenue-enhancement” is now the primary goal of
agencies charged with peace and public safety right under the nose of
the Queen, who maintains her schedule of visits to the poor but never
addresses their problems or terrors. Royal Visits always comprise
shallow chit-chat, as a matter of policy. DEBT AND CLASS BANKRUPTCIES arise
out of Bank Usury, fiat-debt financing and bank fraud, ponzi schemes
and collections scams characteristic of the fiat-debt banking combine
whose runaway inflation has impoverished every worker in the world. SERIAL WARS FOR PROFITS & PROPHETS occur
because defense contractors and paid mercenary terrorists are free from
Legal Accountability under Maritime Law and covert paramilitary
operations. RADIOLOGICAL CONTAMINATION BY DEPLETED URANIUM. — Depleted uranium trade–THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THIS
by a Royal Monarch who Boo-hoos about ecological balance. Such a level
of hypocrisy overlooking four elephants in the room, belies any claim of
leadership skill.
.
V CONCLUSIONS
Britain is now a vassal region of a top-down dictatorial hegemony that
operates from Laws of the Sea in Belgium. It’s primarily a
banker-dominated cabal in control by covert intel (Mossad-led) and
Masonic blackmail, assassination and psych-ops worldwide. This means,
Common Laws against Harm, Deceit, Fraud, Waste and Abuse are inoperative
because “Business As Usual” takes precedent over Justice, and violence
is profitable. Therefore, the teachings of Quran and Talmud with respect
to abuse of women and children, sexual slavery, sex and snuff porn,
female genital mutiltion and all the terrors of Islam; plus a caste
system of “Insiders” versus “Outsiders” as promulgated in the Talmud;
plus wholesale slaughter of innocents staged by “terrorist mercenaries”
is permitted by Radicals under the “Equality of Religion” statute of the
UN and EU Charters, all of which ARE “LEGAL” TO THE EXTENT THESE
PRACTICES CANNOT AND WILL NOT BE PROSECUTED by Courts of the Land.
Indeed, terrorism is staged to keep all people intimidated and in
subjection. Fie on this! Never mind, corporate hegemony is killing the
planet with chemicals, contracted diseases and contaminated vaccines,
and blaming the working people all the while. Totalitarianism and
terrorism have come to Britain, and there is no reason for these to ever
cease, because blackmail, assassinations and trafficking against
dissenters can keep a Legalized Crime Syndicate in place for generations
until and unless populations are energized or Elites get lazy and let
go of their power by leaving the world stage. This Queen Elizabeth II
and her branch of the Line of David let it happen, and they have been in
silent collusion the whole time, whereas my father said no, not this.
Not more war, because he had spent four years on the ground in World War
I. No, not more financial manipulations; he was pro-labor. And I’m here
to say to you, Elites are just letting it happen unless this Throne is
turned over to a bloodline legal heir who serves the people, to correct
these matters, with an education, training, God’s Grace and Strong Arm
[whatever that means] of Almighty Sovereign YHVH, who with the Patriarch
Jacob, forged this Covenant so long ago. Vastly rich people didn’t just
let this happen; they also presided over the gagging of the media; the
concealment of damage their own corporations cause by marketing and
distributing contaminated medical pharmaceuticals, depleted uranium
products, insecticides and genetically modified sterile seeds; and oil
rig accidents uncorrected that BP Oil Co weaseled out of repairing).
Today Elites are planet-killers, loose cannons ecologically, who call on
the rest of us in this world to tighten our belts and take the blame.
But what’s happening to us, the English-speaking peoples of the world,
hides behind a curtain of secrecy, here: [ http://www.holyconservancy.org/protocol.pdf
] get your complete “Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” Illuminist
Playbook for Globalist New World Order hegemony, 46 pages, two-up, print
landscape orientation. And Her Majesty either doesn’t know anything
about it or she’s in on it! I figure, we only have weeks or months at
best to stop the bankster-war parties and their psychopathic hierarchy
from starting another world war to comply with Albert Pike’s
confabulated prophecies of THREE WORLD WARS. Leaders who consent to this
degradation of civil society must be taken aside and given a broom and a
hovel, in exchange for their heinous acts. [ WORLD WAR 3. THE FINAL
SOCIAL CATACLYSM. [ See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IIpv_PAYwY and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Pike
] Non-linear warfare is waged against us all by confusing what we can
know. This is a deplorable way to keep Peoples away from knowing
anything true or not true. [ http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/nonlinear-warfare-a-new-system-of-political-control-2014/
] Journalists in the West are forbidden to tell what are true outcomes
and not true (hoaxed events). But Elites either don’t care or they are
sanctioning this perfidious behavior. [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp-Wh77wt1o
] I believe Her Majesty ought to be explaining to us, >why< she
has not called attention to the Illuminati plans to control, dominate
and >clear< this planet of its peoples.
.
VI LAWS OF MARRIAGE & BLOODLINE [I made a copy of the Mosaic Law, which every King’s offspring in the Kingdom of David is required to make, and it is here: http://www.holyconservancy.org/2728.htm.] English Bill of Rights, 1689,
An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling
the Succession of the Crown. Re-established the monarchy as a result of
the Glorious Revolution. Avalon Project. [ http://billofrightsinstitute.org/resources/educator-resources/americapedia/americapedia-documents/english-bill-of-rights/ ] Act of Settlement, June 12, 1701,
Great Britain Act of Parliament that, since 1701, has regulated the
succession to the throne of Great Britain.
[ http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/536314/Act-of-Settlement ] Royal Marriage Act of 1772, The Regency Collection | Georgian Marriages. [ http://www.legislation.gov.uk/apgb/Geo3/12/11/contents ] His Majesty’s Declaration of Abdication Act, 1936,
recognised and ratified the abdication of King Edward VIII and passed
succession to his brother Prince Albert, Duke of York (who subsequently
became King George VI). The act also excluded any possible future
descendants of Edward from the line of succession. [ http://www.heraldica.org/faqs/abdicate.html ] On one hand, Royals claim to follow the Christian practices of Marriage and legitimate family, but on the other hand, Christian Ethics are now substantially missing from UK State policies and party politics. SEE below.
.
VII TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE
was established and funded by King George the Fifth with Kaiser
Wilhelm. QUOTE: The ideology of American foundations was created by the
Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London. In 1921, the Duke of
Bedford, Marquess of Tavistock, the 11th Duke, gave a building to the
Institute to study the effect of shellshock on British soldiers who
survived World War I. Its purpose was to establish the “breaking point”
of men under stress, under the direction of the British Army Bureau of
Psychological Warfare, commanded by Sir John Rawlings-Reese. Tavistock
Institute is headquartered in London. Its prophet, Sigmond Freud,
settled in Maresfield Gardens when he moved to England. He was given a
mansion by Princess Bonaparte. Tavistock’s pioneer work in behavioral
science along Freudian lines of “controlling” humans established it as
the world center of foundation ideology. Its network now extends from
the University of Sussex to the U.S. through the Stanford Research
Institute, Esalen, MIT, Hudson Institute, Heritage Foundation, Center of
Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown, where State Dept.
personal are trained, US Air Force Intelligence, and the Rand and Mitre
corporations. The personnel of the corporations are required to undergo
indoctrination at one or more of these Tavistock controlled
institutions. A network of secret groups, the Mont Pelerin Society,
Trilateral Commission, Ditchley Foundation, and the Club of Rome is
conduit for instructions to the Tavistock network.
Tavistock Institute developed the mass
brain-washing techniques which were first used experimentally on
American prisoners of war in Korea. Its experiments in crowd control
methods have been widely used on the American public, a surreptitious
but nevertheless outrageous assault on human freedom by modifying
individual behavior through topical psychology. A German refugee, Kurt
Lewin, became director of Tavistock in 1932. He came to the U.S. in 1933
as a “refugee”, the first of many infiltrators, and set up the Harvard
Psychology Clinic, which originated the propaganda campaign to turn the
American public against Germany and involve us in World War II. In 1938,
Roosevelt executed a secret agreement with Churchill which in effect
ceded U.S. sovereignty to England, because it agreed to let Special
Operations Executive control U.S. policies. To implement this agreement,
Roosevelt sent General Donovan to London for indoctrination before
setting up OSS (now the CIA) under the aegis of SOE-SIS. The entire OSS
program, as well as the CIA always worked on guidelines set up by the
Tavistock Institute. Tavistock Institute originated the mass civilian
bombing raids carried out by Roosevelt and Churchill purely as a
clinical experiment in mass terror, keeping records of the results as
they watched the “guinea pigs” reacting under “controlled laboratory
conditions”. All Tavistock and American foundation techniques have a
single goal—to break down the psychological strength of the individual
and render him helpless to oppose the dictators of the World Order. Any
technique which helps to break down the family unit, and family
inculcated principles of religion, honor, patriotism and sexual
behavior, is used by the Tavistock scientists as weapons of crowd
control. The methods of Freudian psychotherapy induce permanent mental
illness in those who undergo this treatment by destabilizing their
character. The victim is then advised to “establish new rituals of
personal interaction”, that is, to indulge in brief sexual encounters
which actually set the participants adrift with no stable personal
relationships in their lives, destroying their ability to establish or
maintain a family. UNQUOTE The very idea that Her Majesty hasn’t been
aware of the deleterious effects of Tavistock propaganda upon the moral
and ethical foundation of Britain is simply beyond cognition. She can’t
be that stupefied; neither can she be that blind to the reality that
Tavistock’s mandate is to undo “Christian” Ethics en toto; but here
Elizabeth II is, Head of the Church of England!
.
VIII UNESCO’S COMMON CORE SEX CURRICULA “Never mind, morality.” QUOTE TEACHINGS: The
Common Core curriculum encourages parents to be supportive and
open-minded to gender identity and sexual orientation, and discourages
them from enforcing traditional gender identities: “Confusion about
these issues and fear of homosexuality (homophobia) has caused many
parents and other adults to limit how girls and boys express
themselves.” One curriculum asks parents to refrain from teaching
children about morality, as there are no right and wrong values, while
another model curriculum asks parents to address contradictions in
“religious approaches and rights based approaches.” Perhaps the most
disturbing of the curricula asks parents to foster early sexual
development by encouraging children to “experience genital pleasure”
from birth until age 2 and by age 3, to encourage “sex play.” The report
also heavily promotes the encouragment of abortion and lists the
International Planned Parenthood Federation and other abortion advocacy
organizations as references. Her Majesty’s VOW, remember ? “Will you, to the utmost of your power, maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the gospel?” Or
did we all forget that the limits and boundaries on sexual behavior
have the outcome of protecting bloodline families, because Christianity
is “about” maintaining bloodline families from generation-to-generation
and from millennium-to-millennium . . . ? And so, in the effort to
protect family vows and covenants, we do abridge and edit our sexual
behavior voluntarily. But has Her Majesty demanded that Britain’s
Christians be allowed to opt out from the teachings of profligate sexual
behavior in the face of Common Core Curricula contradictions? Not a
word. Moreover, Common Core teachings justify pedophilia (and resultant
blackmail) coerce certain adults who buy in to fail and fall in their
reputations. Indeed! It is very easy to blackmail an Elite who has opted
in to profligate sexual practices. This is how totalitarianism gets
its foothold, its control over individuals. SEE [ http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/family/item/ 631-unesco-report-sex-guidelines-for-kids-from-birth ]
.
VIII PARTIES OF THE FIRST PART Picture is of Father and Grandson Edward at age 22
The Complainant is daughter of King
Edward VIII who became the Duke of Windsor when he fled and then was
exiled from his home country–who ruled for only ten months among his
enemies. Her books at Amazon cover Earth’s ET history, History of
Hierarchy and Law http://www.amazon.com/dp/1492359750, Restoring the Kingdom of God to Sovereignty, http://www.amazon.com/dp/1451529155/
, and other volumes of Community Development, Conspiracies and Crafts,
17 in all. Emily Elizabeth Windsor-Cragg, born in 1944 in Edward’s 50th
year, is educated and trained in Group Problem Solving, Conflict and
Dispute Analysis and IT. See her Profile at LinkedIN.com. Five grown
children, Heather Anne, Andrew, Dayna Jes ianette, Edward Scott and
Steven Walter (four with university degrees) command skilln IT,
Hospitality, Permaculture, Military Security and Logistics. No one in
our family has ever been charged with a crime. To date, only one was
divorced and remarried. Nine grandchildren are all healthy and somewhat
gifted.
What’s going on with the Windsor family RE: SUCCESSION
Edward violated the 1772 Marriage Act by
marrying a divorcee who was [secretly] a double Mi-5 agent in the employ
of King George V during WWI serving as intermediary between the King
and his German cousin Kaiser Wilhelm, as well as with the eldest son,
Adolph. As a result Parliament [knowing the secret] passed an Act that
removed Edward’s Royal privileges and all of any issue/children he may
have ever had. There’s reason to believe from “a King’s Story,” that if
Edward ever found out who and what Wallis was, it never seemed to show
up in his writings, and his efforts to regain the throne were pitiful
and few and consisted of some negotiations with Germans, who were in
charge anyway. Now. Charles has violated the exact same act, and his
present wife has Catholic connections, also forbidden by Law. So, it
appears to me that the Royals can do one of two things: by lawful
precedent, cut Charles and his kids off (William, Harry and George) as
happened before to Edward; OR, by rescinding the special Act against
Edward, place Charles back in the line of succession except for one
matter: rescinding that Act would restore me and my bloodline as members
(albeit illegitimate] of the family, the bloodline of which I live in
God’s sight by blood.
PROOF OF FAMILY LINE OF DESCENT. Not
having access to samples of my parents’ blood, I have not yet undergone
the sort of DNA test that establish parenthood. But of course, I will
do so when enabled to do so.
PORPHYRIA,
disease of the Bloodline. People ask me how I know I’m Edward Duke of
Windsor’s daughter. I have the congenital blood condition called
Porphyria, the symptoms of which are noted in suffered by Elizabeth the
First’s reign; which sidelined King George the Third; also notable
carriers both George V and his wife, May Teck, both of whom were direct
descendants of Geo III, were my grandparents on my father’s side. I have
it, my son Andrew and his daughter Jessica have a variant of it. No way
that disease arises out of the blue; it’s by genetics alone. I’m in the
bloodline, sidelined, scapegoated and disinherited through no fault of
my own. And She, Her Majesty, has lost her moorings … insofar as
Justice with Mercy, to the Covenant with God. … No I do not sacrifice
babies … to keep going. No need to harm anyone. .
.
— Emily Windsor-Cragg –
