Carol Anne Bond vs. United States, No. 09–1227, 564 U. S. ____ (June 16, 2011)
Full document: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-1227.pdf
http://www.truthwinds.com/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/news.php?q=1311698183
------------------
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuPo335Wp5Q&feature=player_embedded
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We are SOVEREIGN AGAIN!!!!!! US SUPREME COURT RULING JUNE 16, 2011!!!
WE GOT OUR sovereignty BACK !!!!!!!!!!! US SUPREME COURT RULING JUNE 16, 2011!!!!!!!!!!!!
The US Supreme Court overturned a US Court appeals ruling and reinserted state Sovereignty & individual Sovereignty as well!!!
Carol Anne Bond vs. United States, No. 09–1227, 564 U. S. ____ (June 16, 2011)
Full document: http://www.supremecourt.gov/
http://www.truthwinds.com/
------------------
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
4 comments:
REALLY THEN WHY ARE THEY STILL ALOUD TO INVADE OUR PRIVACY? WHERE ARE OUR RIGHTS?
Good News! This was a 9-0 decision! The awakening is happening! I did a video about this today: 9th WAVE - GROUNDBREAKING US SUPREME COURT RULING. At this point, I plan to do more about it in tomorrow's video..... Written, July 26, 2011 http://www.truthwinds.com/siterun_data/government/judicial_and_courts/news.php?q=1311698183 /////
9th WAVE - GROUNDBREAKING US SUPREME COURT RULING.Chargement: 2 088 views // http://www.youtube.com/user/paradoxman316
Ajoutée par/ added by paradoxman316 le25 juil./july 2011 On June 16, 2011, the US Supreme Court overturned a US Court of Appeal ruling; and, believe it or not, reasserted not only State sovereignty but individual sovereignty as well. And we thought the government was going to hell in a hand basket! This unanimous decision, as I see it, is a major turning point, a visible shift in consciousness of the ruling elite. All things are possible. Watch for miraculous reversals in the remainder of this 9th wave.
FROM: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuPo335Wp5Q 14:45min ...
Thank you for the update ON SUPREME COURT RULING. My question is this. If law of the land defined in american jurisprudence vol 16 sec. 256 is the rule of law, then according to the supreme courts opinion we never lost our individual soverienty nor did the state loose its soverienty, am I correct on this matter. I am of the opinion that if the appeals court error dated back to the time of the inactment of its decision, then LAW OF THE LAND as defined in american jurisprudence vol 16 sec 256 states that if that decision by the appeals court was in error then we never lost our soverienty to begin with, that is to say it was never lost except by some delusion. thank you
True sovereignty of American people exists in a republican form of govt. outside the federal democracy. All U.S. citizens are governed under the 14th Ammendment and thus foreign to founding intent as to what 10th Ammendment people are. 14th Ammendment people cant reserve rights under the 10th Ammendment. States cant claim U.S. citizens as being state people. Thus nothing really changed except Supreme Court carved out a U.S.citizen right,U.S. citizens collectively couldn't do themselves. U.S. citizens still can't vote rights into existence and record them in public record the way States reserve their rights by legislative vote and recordation in State Register. Power of people still can't be broadened and expanded outside the body of govt. Thus there is no wall of seperation relative to occupying the people side of the 10th Ammendment until white males born in states seperate from U.S.citizen recognition to vote a 10th Ammendment reservation of right to make 10th Ammendment all inclusive. Today, only corporations,trusts,and other business should be persons under the 14th Ammendment. People become free Citizens,American Citizens the Founders were before U.S. citizen creation. White males need to re-Found the Republic first,relative to Doctrine of Recognition, international law, where foreign nations abroad limit sovereign recognition to white males by Founder's Rights of Conquest and all signatures being white male. 10th Ammendment evidences where people are supposed to be. Namely, seperate and outside. Fatal flaw of being U.S. citizen is that such class of citizen can't challenge or question national debt. If U.S. govt. succumbs to final stage of bankruptcy insolvency it takes all U.S. citizens down with it. All U.S. citizens are tethered to all debts and obligations of U.S. govt. In international law the Creditor governs the debtor. Meaning the private banks of the Federal Reserve and Rothschild central banks abroad have 1st standing lien power to occupy all American sovereignty. No U.S. citizen can challenge or question any part of that debt collection process.
Post a Comment