|
BenghaziGate: Two
9/11's Bring Questions:
Has Uncle Sam Joined
The Jihad?
(Early Info Snips
October 2012)
One of
our favorite American patriots and founding fathers was an anti-Federalist
orator named Patrick Henry. On March 23, 1775, in the House of Burgesses,
at Saint John's Church in Richmond, Virginia, Mr. Henry delivered his most
famous fiery presentation, a speech which is known as his "Give Me
Liberty Or Give Me Death" speech. According to historian and
biographer William Wirt, Henry closed his speech thusly:
"Is
life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains
and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may
take; but as for me, give me Liberty or give me Death!"
In
1788 he delivered another speech which, though it should be, is not nearly
so well-known. An example of his adamant insistence on including a "Bill
of Rights" (the first ten Amendments), this lesser-known speech is
titled: Shall
Liberty or Empire Be Sought?
In
preparation for looking at BenghaziGate
and related concepts, let us reflect upon a couple of lines from this
speech in which Patrick Henry questioned the body of the Constitution as it
stood without the Bill of Rights, which he helped the Convention to finally
add -
When
the American spirit was in its youth, the language of America was
different; liberty, sir, was then the primary object... We drew the spirit
of liberty from our British ancestors; by that spirit we have triumphed
over every difficulty. But now, sir, the American spirit, assisted by the
ropes and chains of consolidation, is about to convert this country into a
powerful and mighty empire. If you make the citizens of this country agree
to become the subjects of one great consolidated empire of America, your
government will not have sufficient energy to keep them together. Such a
government is incompatible with the genius of republicanism. ...
-
So
Patrick Henry was for keeping power and authority distributed in the
several States, was against concentrating power in the new General
government, and fought against an overly-empowered Federal government - but
he was over-ridden and for more than twenty decades since we have moved
toward ever-more centralization of power and authority in the Federal
government.
Along
the way, we've begun to worship the office of President unduly as we've
watched the Executive usurp Congressional and Judicial powers to the point
that, by 1947, President Truman consented to and signed into law the
National Security Act of 1947 which created the CIA. Six short years
later our CIA took down the duly elected democratic government of Iran and CIA has
lingered long in the middle east ever since, doing what CIA does best -
keeping deep dark ugly secrets from the American people while rampaging
amok in the name of American and multi-national corporate 'interests' at
the expense of stability in oil-producing nations.
We
see that eventually that omniscient centralized government Patrick Henry
dreaded was allowed to develop. For over five decades it has wreaked havoc
around the world. Since 1947 it has honed a domestic policy which has
intimidated any dissent and has used the strong arm of the government to
chill the speech of Americans who do not agree with such mischief. It has
burgeoned into an oligarchic, fascistic, iron-fisted super-surveillance
military-police state mechanism called the U.S. Department of Homeland
Security.
And
now? Well, now the chickens are coming home to roost. The unholy serpent
shall devour its tail while deep dark secrets are transmuted in the sordid
bowels of deception and we are found wanting for asking if our dearly
beloved Commander in Chief, President Obama, has lied through his teeth
regarding the Federal government's smuggling of armaments to al Qaeda in
Libya and Syria.
The
question may have standing.
It
appears that our ambassador to Libya was working with the CIA. It appears
that the CIA was providing arms to al Qaeda and other Islamic Jihadist
groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood for the purpose of taking down
governments in the middle-east - with the President's knowledge.
If
this proves to be true, this thing is positively huge. Can it conceivably
cost a sitting President his office? Can it throw the 2012 Presidential
election? Can it awaken the cheer-leading sports-addicted and creature-comfort-crazed
American public? Dare the media toss it out onto the table?
We
are confronted by a bitter question. Watch the following brief videos and
judge for yourself whether the U.S. government, all bright and shiny in its
choreography and colluded chorus, dressed in its cloak of lies which have
been fabricated through six decades of 'national security secrecy', has
joined al Qaeda or not. Questions are coming "fast and furious",
this time on a truly global and totally world-shattering scale.
BENGHAZI-WAS
THIS A UNITED STATES GUNRUNNING OPERATION TO AL QAIDA JIHADIS?
Former
20 year CIA veteran,
Claire Lopez: "Jordan is targeted! Saudi Arabia is
targeted!"
(excerpt
from above link -- read whole article at link)
Questions:
- Could
the Obama Administration's Fast and Furious gunrunning operation
to the Mexican drug cartels be simply a dress rehearsal for a much
larger gunrunning operation to al Qaida-linked and
other Jihadist groups in Libya and, more ominously, Syria?
- Is the
Obama Administration running guns into other Jihadist hot spots?
- Does
the United States of America have troops in Jordan?
- Was
Ambassador Stevens our operational officer in a
gunrunning operation to al Qaida linked groups that had
"gone wrong?"
- Did
the Obama Administration set Stevens up and leave him (with former
Navy Seals, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods and computer expert, Sean
Smith) to die?
- Did
President, Secretary Clinton, General Petraeus and others have
fore-knowledge?
- Others?
- Who
else knows now?
- Does
Governor Romney know now?
These
and other questions and more were raised yesterday [October 24, 2012] in a
conversation between Glen Beck and former CIA agent Clair Lopez.
The
videos below are from the above link in this section.
-
|
|
|
Glenn Beck - Libya The Real Story
|
|
|
|
GBTV: Claire Lopez, Part 1
|
|
|
|
GBTV: Claire Lopez, Part 2
|
-
Question:
When did Syria become a threat to the USA?
Question:
Is "the enemy of my enemy" necessarily my friend, when the enemy
of my enemy is al Qaeda?
Question:
Should the American people be pleased when the ATF
furnishes high-powered guns and ammo to Mexican drug cartels and nobody
goes to jail?
Question:
Should the American people be pleased when taxpayer dollars are spent by
the DEA
to smuggle drugs into this country from Mexico in order to learn more about
the Mexican drug cartels, and nobody goes to jail?
Question:
How much outright crime by Eric Holder's Justice Department, which oversaw
the gun running, the money laundering, and the drug smuggling, should the
American people put up with, while Eric Holder does not go to jail?
Question:
How does the NSA spy on every American
citizen's emails and phone calls when the Fourth Amendment clearly states
"probable cause", and nobody goes to jail?
Question:
If the Federal government has been caught lying to the American people
about Pearl Harbor, Korea, Vietnam, the Gary Frances Powers U-2 shoot-down
over Russia, the Bay of Pigs fiasco, the assassination of John F. Kennedy,
the Watergate break-in, the October Surprise, the Iran-Contra scandal, the
BCCI scandal, the invasion of Iraq, and the longest ground war in our
history -- the hunt for al Qaeda in Afghanistan -- what on earth would
cause any thinking American to blindly believe that the Federal government
is not lying through its teeth right now about running arms to al Qaeda in
Libya and Syria?
Question:
If our Federal government has so concentrated the authority and power which
it has usurped from the several States which created it, is it not the
responsibility of the several States to rein-in that usurpation and bring
it back into compliance with its enumerated powers as listed in Article I,
Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution?
There
are, of course, other significant questions. Every American should have
lots of questions. A good question might be -- If a sitting U.S. President
imagines some reason to furnish military armaments to al Qaeda and/or
associated Jihadist terror organizations, should that President go to jail?
A
truism left to us by Thomas Jefferson will do nicely to end this initial
glance at how the power players on high perceive themselves -
"Experience
hath Shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted
with power have, in time and by slow operations, perverted it into
tyranny."
-
|
No comments:
Post a Comment