I received this
message yesterday. If
this proves to be true, it is impeachable
grounds. It helps explain why Petreaus was forced out a few days before
the Benghazi hearings. It explains a lot of behavior by Obama and his
administration - the pulled security, the stand down orders, and blaming that
stupid video. The fireworks are coming. It will be the first of
many disasters ahead. Please share with your email list.
According to sources in the State Department and the CIA, and intercepted communications from the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama "staged" the attack in Benghazi in order to create a monumental "October Surprise" that would guarantee him re-election. Yes, you read that right, and no, I'm not making this up. Obama, we now know, is and has been working with the Muslim Brotherhood secretly to engineer the release of the "Blind Sheik," Omar Abdel Rahman, the mastermind behind the 1993 World Trade Center attack. In Obama's October Surprise, he intentionally set up the consulate to have no security so that Chris Stevens could be kidnapped, and held for ransom by Al-Qaeda (and the Muslim Brotherhood). Then, several days before the election, the plan was to trade Chris Stevens for the Blind Sheik, making himself look like a hero, and all but guaranteeing re-election. This was one of the top reasons why Obama was so insistent on the Muslim Brotherhood getting $1.2 Billion in U.S. Aid. They were to have a primary role in getting Obama re-elected. That is why, even though they knew days before the attack that it was going to occur, no effort was made to bolster security. It was intended to be non-existent. The Libyan security forces were intended to quietly slip into the night when the attack began. And they did, just as planned. That is why, even though 2 C-130U gunships, which were built SPECIFICALLY for this kind of attack, and which could have saved the lives of our people there and were a mere 45 minutes away, were never scrambled at any time during the attack. There was to be no resistance whatsoever. That is why there were not one, but TWO armed drones flying over the consulate during the conflagration... our CIA operatives on the ground were painting targets because they knew air cover was available. That is why, even though requesting support and backup three times, their requests were NOT ignored, but were intentionally, specifically DENIED three times, and they were told to "stand down," which basically means to "surrender." That was part of Obama's plan. They were not to fight back. That would potentially undermine the kidnapping effort and cause unnecessary "complications." That is why, even though the CIA operatives and ex-Navy Seals were on the ground, providing real-time reports, and even though they were "lighting up" the source of the mortars attacking the compound with lasers, no gunships or support ever came. They weren't supposed to resist. That wasn't "part of the plan." It also wasn't part of the plan for one of the CIA operatives to intentionally defy Obama's orders, and who rescued the body of Sean Smith and then stood up again orders, and engaged the enemy who was attacking American soil. It was supposed to be "clean." Quick. Efficient. Kidnap the Ambassador and get out. Then Save The Day in the "nick of time." They didn't factor in a tiny group of highly trained ex-Navy Seals/CIA operatives... American Patriots and heroes. Even though they eventually lost their lives in the firefight, they managed to employ the full measure of their skills, and took out over 80 attackers in the process... which enraged the attackers, who were led to believe that they would encounter no resistance. THAT is why Ambassador Stevens was raped, murdered, and dragged through the streets. In their warped minds, they believed that they had been betrayed by the U.S. yet again. They believed that Obama was their friend. They believed that they were going to get their beloved Blind Sheik back. And yet, here were 80 of their own... dead by American hands. Obama was asked directly in an interview if he denied their request for assistance, he refused to answer, and instead droned on with a canned response promising to "bring those responsible to justice." Former CIA and State Dept. personnel are coming out now with damning evidence that indicts President Obama, and reveals the truth about what is going on. Hillary Clinton, who is now openly laying the blame at the feet of the President, after falling on her sword in a premature show of loyalty for the Administration. The "Video" defense was carefully crafted WEEKS in advance, to explain the attack. If this doesn't outrage you, you are not a Patriot. If you are not moved enough to contact your congressman about this, you are not worthy of your citizenship.
According to sources in the State Department and the CIA, and intercepted communications from the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama "staged" the attack in Benghazi in order to create a monumental "October Surprise" that would guarantee him re-election. Yes, you read that right, and no, I'm not making this up. Obama, we now know, is and has been working with the Muslim Brotherhood secretly to engineer the release of the "Blind Sheik," Omar Abdel Rahman, the mastermind behind the 1993 World Trade Center attack. In Obama's October Surprise, he intentionally set up the consulate to have no security so that Chris Stevens could be kidnapped, and held for ransom by Al-Qaeda (and the Muslim Brotherhood). Then, several days before the election, the plan was to trade Chris Stevens for the Blind Sheik, making himself look like a hero, and all but guaranteeing re-election. This was one of the top reasons why Obama was so insistent on the Muslim Brotherhood getting $1.2 Billion in U.S. Aid. They were to have a primary role in getting Obama re-elected. That is why, even though they knew days before the attack that it was going to occur, no effort was made to bolster security. It was intended to be non-existent. The Libyan security forces were intended to quietly slip into the night when the attack began. And they did, just as planned. That is why, even though 2 C-130U gunships, which were built SPECIFICALLY for this kind of attack, and which could have saved the lives of our people there and were a mere 45 minutes away, were never scrambled at any time during the attack. There was to be no resistance whatsoever. That is why there were not one, but TWO armed drones flying over the consulate during the conflagration... our CIA operatives on the ground were painting targets because they knew air cover was available. That is why, even though requesting support and backup three times, their requests were NOT ignored, but were intentionally, specifically DENIED three times, and they were told to "stand down," which basically means to "surrender." That was part of Obama's plan. They were not to fight back. That would potentially undermine the kidnapping effort and cause unnecessary "complications." That is why, even though the CIA operatives and ex-Navy Seals were on the ground, providing real-time reports, and even though they were "lighting up" the source of the mortars attacking the compound with lasers, no gunships or support ever came. They weren't supposed to resist. That wasn't "part of the plan." It also wasn't part of the plan for one of the CIA operatives to intentionally defy Obama's orders, and who rescued the body of Sean Smith and then stood up again orders, and engaged the enemy who was attacking American soil. It was supposed to be "clean." Quick. Efficient. Kidnap the Ambassador and get out. Then Save The Day in the "nick of time." They didn't factor in a tiny group of highly trained ex-Navy Seals/CIA operatives... American Patriots and heroes. Even though they eventually lost their lives in the firefight, they managed to employ the full measure of their skills, and took out over 80 attackers in the process... which enraged the attackers, who were led to believe that they would encounter no resistance. THAT is why Ambassador Stevens was raped, murdered, and dragged through the streets. In their warped minds, they believed that they had been betrayed by the U.S. yet again. They believed that Obama was their friend. They believed that they were going to get their beloved Blind Sheik back. And yet, here were 80 of their own... dead by American hands. Obama was asked directly in an interview if he denied their request for assistance, he refused to answer, and instead droned on with a canned response promising to "bring those responsible to justice." Former CIA and State Dept. personnel are coming out now with damning evidence that indicts President Obama, and reveals the truth about what is going on. Hillary Clinton, who is now openly laying the blame at the feet of the President, after falling on her sword in a premature show of loyalty for the Administration. The "Video" defense was carefully crafted WEEKS in advance, to explain the attack. If this doesn't outrage you, you are not a Patriot. If you are not moved enough to contact your congressman about this, you are not worthy of your citizenship.
15 comments:
Why would obama communicate with a Muslim Brotherhood knowing the communication was not secure and could be intercepted and plan an attack on his own people. As Commander in Chief, he can just create a sex scandal like what is going on with Petraeus and what happened with his secret service detail with prostitutes and wasn't there with with a Frenchman who left his cell phone and then called back to have it delivered to him and they found him.
No need to set up a botched kill when a sex scandall will make anyone lose credibility.
He can stop whatever he wanted to stop with the NDAA order.
Doesn't make sense, and also the 'if this is true then' stuff is getting old. I see right through it.
I don't believe this story either....I think it came from Glen Beck and this is just his speculation.....IMO the truth is YET to be revealed and when it comes we may all be in for a HUGE surprise!!
WHEN will Americans understand that we do NOT have a 'vote' in this nation. WHEN will Americans understand that we can not impeach the president of a private corporation operating as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA? Remember Clinton? And Bush? They were 'impeached' - or so America thought - and WHAT HAPPENED AS A RESULT? NOTHING folks - ABSOLUTELY NOTHING - EXCEPT THAT THESE TRAITORS CONTINUED ON WITH THEIR 'BUSINESS' AS USUAL.
We cannot impeach the president of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION any more than we can impeach the president of Coca Cola or Pepsi - or Microsoft. BO is NOT OUR REAL PRESIDENT - JUST POSING AND OPERATING AS THOUGH HE IS ALONG WITH THE TRAITORS WORKING WITH HIM. The only way to rid this nation of their abominations is to arrest, convict and carry out the sentence for being traitors. WHY is this not being done? This should have been done months ago.
Also....the FIRST 911 had NOTHING to do with this Shiek....we still don't have the TRUTH on the FIRST 9/11 let alone the second one!
Contact my Congressional Representative? I have ... on many occasions. Both of them are Democrats and stand by Obama. What other suggestions do you have for me?
... and even there are impeachable grounds, who is going to implement that? We don't need whistle blowers at this time, we need doers -that's the big problem we have now.
The Project Camelot Kerry Cassidy interview with ex-CIA Susan Lindauer discussed that the FBI has gone vicious against the CIA, trying to take over its foreign operations and budget, and that the Obama administration/banking/oil/FED corporations want to declare martial law and enslave the people -- while the MILITARY is engaged in a coup to STOP them because THEY know what is planned against the people.
Petraeus was moved to the CIA in an effort to DISCREDIT the military and, even though the FBI and Obama KNEW about his emails months ago, THIS is yet ANOTHER attempt to discredit the military and make the people NOT have faith in them.
Dr. Steven Pieczenik, in a youtube interview with Alex Jones on Nov 13 basically said the same thing -- that investigations and prosecutions should be taken in this order of crimes committed:
1) FBI - Mueller was involved in 9/11 and Benghazi
2) CIA
3) military generals - 300 to 400 should be fired
4) all those in the Obama administration involved in Benghazi, to include Hillary
In MY opinion, the military should have taken action WAY before now, as the PEOPLE have been asking them to.
Excuse me, but BHO has members of the Muslim Brotherhood visit him at the White House on a regular basis. All visits are logged. What is new? His Sec. of State's top assistant, Uma Abedin, has parents who have ties with the Muslim Brotherhood, as does Uma. He himself is a Muslim...Why are you so perplexed with his inability or supposed problem communicating with members of the Muslim Brotherhood? In fact, could it have been Uma who removed the word "terrorist" from Susan Rice's memo? Or one of several other Muslims who serve in administrative positions in DHS and elsewhere and would like us to think that perhaps it was either George Bush's fault or the Israeli Mossad's? Lol! Just wondering...
And while I'm at it...IMPEACHMENT?? Another LOL! I would think TREASON would be a more appropriate charge than impeachment. Let's see...fraudulent soc. sec. card, forged birth certificateS (plural), Indonesian citizenship recorded and acknowledged on a school record, several books written by BHO himself claiming a British national was his father, (You can't have a Brit for a father and be a natural born citizen) a passport that mysteriously disappeared from the State Dept. and the young man who was to testify (Lt. Quarles Harris)is murdered the night before he was to appear in court... Do you get the picture?
Hey! I have been outraged for years about the crap he gets away with. No one does anything except make noise. Excuse me, write my congressman? My senator voted for the NDAA and the purchase of 30,000 drones to shoot Americans; whose side do you think he's on anway? I am not surprised Obama would tell the Americans to stand down, as he has already said that when push came to shove, he would side with Islam!
Should have been done years ago.....MALITIAS I SAY GO AFTER THE AHOS.... ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.........SINCE THEY DID NOT SURRENDER... HANG THEM.
Contact my Congressional Representative? CHANCES HE OR SHE IS PART OF THE PROBLEM.... WE JUST NEED TO ROLL UP ARE SLEEVES AND CLEAN HOUSE.... MOST OF THE BASTARDS NEED TO BE .....H U N G !!!!! FORGET THIS WE ARE NIOE GUYS BS..IT IS GETTING US .... N O W H E R E.... OUR FOREFATHERS WOULD HAVE HUNG THEM A LONG TIME AGO. WHEN I WAS IN THE 5TH GRADE I WAS A NICE WELL MANNERED LITTLE GUY. THEN A COUPLE OF 6TH GRADE BULLIES STARTED PICKING ON KIDS IN MY SCHOOL AND NO ONE LIFTED A FINGER TO STOP THEM. THEN THEY DECIDED TO PICK ON ME ONE NIGHT. BAD MOVE ON THEIR BEHALF. I AM 1/2 IRISH AND COULD BE ORNERY AS HELL..... AND MY DAD TAUGHT ME TO FIGHT... AFTER I GOT DONE KICKING THEIR STARRY ASSES WE NEVER HAD ANOTHER PROBLEM. BY THE WAY TELL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES TO TELL OBAMA THAT WE WILL BE INTRODUCING HIM TO BIG BUBBA SOON....
I agree with you on that!
OMG finally, someone that gets it. Yay!! These people are modern day PIRATES. They are not even a de facto they are more of a shadow of a government. That is all they are. They work fear and intimidation. They inched their way in, but now that they are there, they are going to be very difficult to get out. They operate under shadow of darkness. If all we do is expose them for what they are and all that they do, we are one step ahead. We owe them as much as we owe any other corporation. NOTHING!!! Some people are starting to wake up to that fact.
What needs to happen is that we need to start looking at them as what they are a CORPORATION. If an executive of Walmart or McDonalds did something like this, what would be charges could be they be charged with. The only way you are going to get any action MAYBE from the CONgress is to show them proof and put them on notice that having known and having been complicit, they will be accomplices.
All this rage-inducing "we need justice" stuff is just a distraction from the real issue, which is that government is completely unredeemable for it is completely under the control of people who are completely evil. It acts without concern for law. It does what it pleases. You can say "impeach so-and-so!" all you want, but even if you impeached everybody it wouldn't change the root of the problem; as such, calls for impeachment or "unelecting" certain officials are a waste of life.
Post a Comment