UNODA - UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR DISARMAMENT AFFAIRS

February 06, 2013  UNODA - UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR DISARMAMENT AFFAIRS

Small Arms
Insurgents, armed gang members, pirates, terrorists - they can all multiply their force through the use of unlawfully acquired firepower. The illicit circulation of small
arms, light weapons and their ammunition destabilizes communities, and impacts security and development in all regions of the world.

A worldwide scourge
The illicit trade in small arms, light weapons and ammunition wreaks havoc everywhere. Mobs terrorizing a neighbourhood. Rebels attacking civilians or peacekeepers.
Drug lords randomly killing law enforcers or anyone else interfering with their illegal businesses. Bandits hijacking humanitarian aid convoys. In all continents,
uncontrolled small arms form a persisting problem. READ FOR YOURSELF HERE

COMMON SENSE IMPLEMENTED:  First, where does the United Nations (UN) get the right to interfere with a Sovereign People (Americans) and our RIGHTS? By
their own words "ILLICIT TRADE" they are saying there is NO PROTECTION for the people, but yet they want to take the weapons that LAW ABIDING PEOPLE
would have for protection of self and their family.  Carefully read the above two paragraphs which are directly from UNODA, link above.  Now really think about this
for a moment and answer this question:  Do you really think a ban on small arms will keep you safe from "ILLICIT GUN TRADE"?  Do you think this illicit trade will
stop?  Now think about "Fast and Furious", the US CORPORATE GOVERNMENT GAVE WEAPONS TO THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTEL, really think about that for
a moment. Do you really want only the GOVERNMENT AND THE DRUG LORDS OR LAW BREAKERS TO HAVE GUNS?  
There is going to be another vote in March on the UN Small Arms Gun Ban.  Contrast this against  Switzerland that has the lowest crime rate in the world, is it because
their guns are banned?  No, it is just the opposite, every home has a rifle and/or a handgun, that is at least about 99% of them, contrast that with Chicago that has some
of the most stringent gun laws in the country and  crime is very high, and look at what Australia  has to say since their guns have been banned VIDEO

NO AMERICAN should be supporting this or any ban on weapons of any kind in our country, and if they do , they are NOT AMERICANS in the true sense of the
word, because it is not only our Bill of Rights, but it is also COMMON SENSE for our own protection. There are Americans that are US citizens only to conduct
commerce; then there are US citizens that are married to the system in ideology and perhaps even took an Oath to the UNITED NATIONS, and in their mind it
supersedes their Constitutional Oath to the people, such as politicians and provocateurs to do their bidding (Agent (Provocateur Law & Legal Definition ... Disrupt the
activities of radical political groups in the U.S)

We already have all the laws we need against criminals having guns, but yet they still have them, and they still will if they are banned.  Has anyone heard of the 'Black
Market'!  Look back at history, the first act that took place before complete tyranny of the people BY THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT was a banning of guns, the ability
to protect themselves. Contrary to what some people choose to believe this CAN happen in America and is.

If common sense doesn't speak to your heart, then let me share this information:  

"Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957), is a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled
that the Constitution supersedes international treaties ratified by the United States Senate."

With this ruling the DEFACTO UNITED STATES CORPORATE GOVERNMENT would once again be ignoring the LAW if they attempt to enact the UNITED
NATIONS Small Arms Treaty that is in conflict with our Constitutional BILL OF RIGHTS that BIND THE OVER-STEPPING REACH OF THE GOVERNMENT
against the American people.  Then follow the above case with the below information:
:

BLACK, J., Judgment of the Court - SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - 354 U.S. 1 - Reid v. Covert

Article VI, the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, declares:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof, and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the
Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; . . .

There is nothing in this language which intimates that treaties and laws enacted pursuant to them do not have to comply with the provisions of the Constitution.
Nor is there anything in the debates which accompanied the drafting and ratification of the Constitution which even suggests such a result. These debates, as
well as the history that surrounds the adoption of the treaty provision in Article VI, make it clear that the reason treaties were not limited to those made in
"pursuance" of the Constitution was so that agreements made by the United States under the Articles of Confederation, including the important peace treaties
which concluded the Revolutionary [p17] War, would remain in effect. [n31] It would be manifestly contrary to the objectives of those who created the
Constitution, as well as those who were responsible for the Bill of Rights -- let alone alien to our entire constitutional history and tradition -- to construe Article
VI as permitting the United States to exercise power under an international agreement without observing constitutional prohibitions. [n32] In effect, such
construction would permit amendment of that document in a manner not sanctioned by Article V. The prohibitions of the Constitution were designed to apply to
all branches of the National Government, and they cannot be nullified by the Executive or by the Executive and the Senate combined.

There is nothing new or unique about what we say here. This Court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over a treaty.
[n33] For example, in Geofroy v. Riggs, 133 U.S. 258, 267, it declared:

The treaty power, as expressed in the Constitution, is in terms unlimited except by those restraints which are found in that instrument against the action
of the government or of its departments, and those arising from the nature of the government itself and of that of the States. It would not be contended
that it extends so far as to authorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the [p18] government, or in that of one of the States,
or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter, without its consent.

This Court has also repeatedly taken the position that an Act of Congress, which must comply with the Constitution, is on a full parity with a treaty, and that,
when a statute which is subsequent in time is inconsistent with a treaty, the statute to the extent of conflict renders the treaty null. [n34] It would be completely
anomalous to say that a treaty need not comply with the Constitution when such an agreement can be overridden by a statute that must conform to that
instrument. Reference

So, how do we combat such blatant corruption of our BILL OF RIGHTS by those that are suppose to be protecting them?  Well, here is one way that people are taking
action.  This was sent to me today:

From: isaiah
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 6:24 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: this is going to my local boards, give me your input

The below should be done in every twp and county and state.

February 8 2013

TO Newberg Township and Cass County Board Commissioners,

A open request to adopt An ordnance prohibiting any Federal gun control Laws that are not in harmony with the Second Amendment to the Organic
Constitution of the United States.

“ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS OR LAWS REPUGNANT TO THE ABOVE DOCUMENT shall be rendered Null N Void and None Enforceable.”

NOTE: The term in the Second Amendment, “A Well Regulated Militia.” Well regulated has nothing whatsoever to do with any type of government
control!
The term means that you are “proficient in the use of your arms!”
The definitions at the time can be found on this web site (http://www.michiganfreedejurestate.us/news.html)  along with a lot of other good
information.
home page  http://www.michiganfreedejurestate.us
Some food for thought in some other Nations where it is a requirement to have a military type weapon and ammunition in every home and they are
required to attend regular training the crime is near non existent, Switzerland is one and they have the lowest crime rate in the world.

This is what it takes people, we are the solution, and its right where we are, and we must, with RESOLVE demand our RIGHTS be protected, and. what good is the
UN Small Arms Ban if each local township, city and/or state has laws making it null and void?  The same can be done for all the other atrocities that are being carried
out on the American people. We...the people, which is "of, by, and for the people" can get it done if we come together in our own communities to protect our own
RIGHTS.  It is lawful, and our DUTY to do so, reference "The Declaration of Independence:

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the
political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the
earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle
them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes
which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by
their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit
of Happiness.— That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving
their just powers from the consent of the governed,— That whenever any Form of Government
becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to
institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in
such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence,
indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and
transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to
suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they
are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same
Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty,
to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.— Such has
been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains
them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great
Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the
establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a
candid world." [ Read the Facts by scrolling down on the DOI Document]

My final note is, I pray every American will ponder the information presented and each individual will search their heart for TRUTH and stand on that truth, because
that is what separated America from the rest of the world, not the US Government, but the SOVEREIGN PEOPLE and the RIGHTS given to us by OUR CREATOR.  
This is why so many migrated to America, something that most all natural Americans do not understand, but soon will if this self-destructive course we're on is not
diverted.
A very wise person said, "The cork won't pop until pressure is applied at the bottom".  Are we going to lawfully and peaceably "pop the cork" and "release our freedom
out of the hands of those that are attempting to take them, instead of honoring their oaths to protect them? <><

If reference links don’t work, go to www.michiganfreedejurestate.us/news.html